Many thanks for your answers to the comments of the two reviewers. I would appreciate that you submit a revised version of the manuscript taking into account the different points raised by the reviewers as you indicate (also include a short discussion as proposed for the comments of reviewer 2 on short term CH4 variability).

Many thanks for your new manuscript.

Still, I think that it would be nice that you spend some time to read a last time the manuscript with some of the co-authors. I noticed some mistakes in the grammar / wording in some sentences (especially in the beginning of the manuscript and in the captions) and I suspect that there may be much more than what I can identify. Also, you have to revise the writing of some d15N, brackets are not often well used, etc...
Be careful for some definitions (it seems that D-O has not been defined and the grey rectangles on your figures show the transition between stadial and interstadial and not the whole D-O events).
Be more precise on what is done in equation (2) (what is exactly gm, which unit, sum on which elements)
In the figures, you often do not precise that you are referring to CH4 record - in general, the captions of the figure could be made much clearer.
When you send your manuscript back, can you include a version with tracked changes ?
Many thanks for your efforts,

Thanks for your work.

Can you still add two clarifications in the final text:
- Equation (2): on which (+ how many) elements do you sum up ?
- In the conclusion: "The absolute uncertainty of the gas chronology changes through time to a maximum (2 𝜎) of ± 540 years at 35 ka, and an uncertainty of ± 502 years at the bottom of the core. " -> Can you make it clearer that your uncertainty is always calculated as a 2 sigma uncertainty if this is indeed the case ?