Articles | Volume 21, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-1699-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.On the implementation of external forcings in a regional climate model – a sensitivity study around the Samalas volcanic eruption in the Eastern Mediterranean/Middle East
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 02 Oct 2025)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 25 Mar 2025)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1026', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Apr 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Eva Hartmann, 04 Jun 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1026', Anonymous Referee #2, 23 May 2025
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Eva Hartmann, 04 Jun 2025
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (05 Jun 2025) by Hugues Goosse

AR by Eva Hartmann on behalf of the Authors (16 Jun 2025)
Author's response
EF by Katja Gänger (17 Jun 2025)
Manuscript
EF by Katja Gänger (17 Jun 2025)
Author's tracked changes
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (17 Jun 2025) by Hugues Goosse
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (04 Jul 2025)

ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (25 Jul 2025) by Hugues Goosse

AR by Eva Hartmann on behalf of the Authors (28 Jul 2025)
Author's response
Manuscript
Summary
The authors investigate the effect of including the correct external forcing in the regional climate model for past climate states. They found that orbital changes and volcanic forcing has some impact on the temperature in the region of the eastern Mediterranean and the Arabic Peninsula. The precipitation response is rather weak and not significant.
General
Overall, this is a well structured and well written manuscript, which investigates an interesting technical aspect of paleo climate modelling. The authors showed that the impact of not including the full forcing in the regional climate model (RCM) seems to be of second order relevance compared to the gain of higher resolution although in some variables it might be important to include the forcing in the RCM correctly. Such a clear statement is missing and can be included in the manuscript if the authors agree.
Thus, I think this is certainly of importance to the scientific community and I recommend publication after some minor revisions.
Major
Minor
Middle East is maybe problematic as it is a geopolitical concept. Please use a different phrasing for the region. At least some of my colleagues react on using this for a geographical region.
P1,l4: Please change to “Here,”
P1,l15: I think that the current study does not provide “a unique source of information for the comparison of paleoclimate simulations with proxy records” as only sensitivity simulations are presented for a short period in the past. The full 2500 year long simulation certainly will do this but for this study I suggest to remove the sentences “The study is part of the new 2500-year-long transient, fully forced RCM simulation over the Eastern Mediterranean / Middle East. This work introduces a unique source of information for the comparison of paleoclimate simulations with proxy records and reconstructions” .
P2,l44: For LGM there are also a couple of studies using even convection permitting resolutions:. It may be nice to mention this here.
Velasquez P., J. O. Kaplan, P. Ludwig, M. Messmer, and C. C. Raible, 2021: The role of land cover on the climate of glacial Europe. Climate of the Past, 17, 1161-1180.
Velasquez, P., Messmer, M., and Raible, C. C., 2022: The role of ice-sheet topography on the Alpine hydro-climate at glacial times, Climate of the Past, 18, 1579–1600.
Russo, E., Buzan, J., Lienert, S., Jouvet, G., Velasquez, P., Davis, B., Ludwig, P., Joos, F. and Raible, C. C., 2023: High resolution reconstruction of LGM climate over Europe and the Alpine region using WRF, Climate of the Past, 20, 449–465, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-449-2024.
P3,l66: please change “Section 2 details the models, their configurations,”
P3,l68: “Section 3 focusses ” reads better.
P3,l71: “In Section 4, we present the main conclusions and outline potential directions for future research.” Reads better.
P3-4: Section 2.1 I would suggest to include part o the discussion presented in this section already in the introduction to make the motivate why the authors focus on this region and this period.
P5,l120: Please remove “is used” after (Tiedtke, 1988).
P5,l126 “In this study, only the”
Caption Fig 3: “Transient forcings ...”
Fig.5 For the mean and the STDD plots it would be better to use discrete colours rather than a continuous colour scale.
L191-195: This is a rather lengthy description for textbook knowledge so just write “The better representation of lower temperatures over orography is due to the lapse rate effect.”
Section 3.1.2/ Fig.6: It would be interesting to also include the ESM result so we can see how the RCM changes the ESM response to volcanic eruptions. Maybe this is interesting for all plots.
Fig 7: I would suggest using a non parametric test as the authors have really a small number of years, So Mann-Whitney-U test would be better here.
L315ff: I think the authors suggest that the decrease in precipitation in 1258 is due to volcanic forcing but given the variability of the time series I am not convinced that there is causality. For this statement the authors need to run an ensemble of simulations. So please rephrase.
Section 3.2.3 I guess it is always mm/month, please adapt this in the manuscript and the figures.
Table 3: It makes no sense to show Min, 5% and 10% as precipitation is not Gaussian distributed.
L389: I would not fully agree that the effect of volcanic forcing in the RCM is pronounced. With just one simulations the authors need to be a bit more careful.
L393-395: “Land-use changes and in particular the choice of external data set have a substantial impact on simulation outcomes. Although not detailed in this study, this was tested, emphasizing the significance of the land-use dataset”. This is fully new result and not presented in the main paper, so I recommend including this result or remove the sentence.
411: please change Methodology to Method