Dear authors,

Thank you very much for your response. I would like to ask you to revise your manuscript and address the comments of the reviewers. In those points where you do not wish to follow the comments, I would ask you to include a short explanation or comment that takes up the arguments of the reviewers where appropriate.

Many thanks to the reviewers for their useful comments!

I am looking forward to the revised version of your manuscript.

Yours sincerely,

Chantal

Dear authors,

Many thanks for the revised version of your very interesting paper. I also thank again the referees for their careful reports. Before publishing the paper, I would like to draw your attention to three small technical corrections:

line 181: relaible to reliable.

line 119: Add a dot after «Fig”.

Please check the use of hyphens and dashes in the text, in some cases you mix them up:
e.g. lines 60/61: 1621–1650, 1545–1576; lines 116, 191 and 270: 1950–2004, line 319: June–July–August

line 65: from 1750 to 1786

e.g. line 193: 1961-1990, line 146/147: October-March, April-September

Yours sincerely,