Dear authors,
I have now gone through your responses to the two reviews and am encouraging you to implement changes in response to the reviewer´s criticism into a revised manuscript following your suggested strategies. I look forward to reading the new version of the manuscript.
Kind regards,
Irina

Dear authors,
both reviewers voiced quite a number of concerns that you have been working to address. I am returning the manuscript for reviews, since both reviewers were so kind as to agree to review it again.
Kind regards,
Irina

Dear authors,
although according to the reviewers, the manuscript has significantly improved since the first round of reviews, the modifications that you have applied have not satisfied any of the reviewers. It is characterized by numerous omissions of reviewers´ suggestions and as it has been put in the second round of reviews, sloppiness. This is not to offend you by any means - as scientists we should be ready for and open to criticism. In light of the new reviews we have received, I invite you to rework your manuscript accordingly. I am not going to send it for another round of reviews (review by editor), but I will make sure that every single suggestion that seems beneficial to the manuscript has been implemented before I pass it to publication.
Good luck! I look forward to reading the new version of your manuscript.
Kind regards,
Irina

Dear authors,
thank you for your serious approach to the reviewers´ comments and suggestions. I do agree with you that your original title is representative of the study, so there is no need to change it. Before we move to the publication stage, I would like you to carefully proofread the manuscript (e.g., the penultimate sentence in the abstract is grammatically incorrect) and reduce the number of acronyms, especially in the abstract.
Congratulations on the fine work and good luck with your future endeavors.
Kind regards,
Irina