Articles | Volume 13, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1851-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1851-2017
Review article
 | 
20 Dec 2017
Review article |  | 20 Dec 2017

Comparing proxy and model estimates of hydroclimate variability and change over the Common Era

PAGES Hydro2k Consortium

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by Editor) (03 Aug 2017) by Helen McGregor
AR by Jason Smerdon on behalf of the Authors (24 Aug 2017)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (11 Sep 2017) by Helen McGregor
AR by Jason Smerdon on behalf of the Authors (20 Sep 2017)  Manuscript 
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (14 Nov 2017) by Helen McGregor
AR by Jason Smerdon on behalf of the Authors (14 Nov 2017)  Author's response 
ED: Publish as is (27 Nov 2017) by Helen McGregor
AR by Jason Smerdon on behalf of the Authors (15 Dec 2017)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Water availability is fundamental to societies and ecosystems, but our understanding of variations in hydroclimate (including extreme events, flooding, and decadal periods of drought) is limited due to a paucity of modern instrumental observations. We review how proxy records of past climate and climate model simulations can be used in tandem to understand hydroclimate variability over the last 2000 years and how these tools can also inform risk assessments of future hydroclimatic extremes.