Articles | Volume 16, issue 4
Clim. Past, 16, 1493–1508, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1493-2020
Clim. Past, 16, 1493–1508, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1493-2020
Research article
11 Aug 2020
Research article | 11 Aug 2020

An empirical evaluation of bias correction methods for palaeoclimate simulations

Robert Beyer et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 3,221 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,259 905 57 3,221 56 61
  • HTML: 2,259
  • PDF: 905
  • XML: 57
  • Total: 3,221
  • BibTeX: 56
  • EndNote: 61
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Feb 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Feb 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,716 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,658 with geography defined and 58 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 08 Aug 2022
Download
Short summary
Even the most sophisticated global climate models are known to have significant biases in the way they simulate the climate system. Correcting model biases is therefore essential for creating realistic reconstructions of past climate that can be used, for example, to study long-term ecological dynamics. Here, we evaluated three widely used bias correction methods by means of a global dataset of empirical temperature and precipitation records from the last 125 000 years.