Articles | Volume 15, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1985-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1985-2019
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
28 Nov 2019
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 28 Nov 2019

Can we use sea surface temperature and productivity proxy records to reconstruct Ekman upwelling?

Anson Cheung, Baylor Fox-Kemper, and Timothy Herbert

Viewed

Total article views: 5,331 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
4,235 1,039 57 5,331 73 81
  • HTML: 4,235
  • PDF: 1,039
  • XML: 57
  • Total: 5,331
  • BibTeX: 73
  • EndNote: 81
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Jun 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,331 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,555 with geography defined and 776 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 19 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
We test two assumptions that are often made in paleoclimate studies by using observations and ask whether temperature and productivity proxy records in the Southern California Current can be used to reconstruct Ekman upwelling. By examining the covariation between alongshore wind stress, temperature, and productivity, we found that the dominant covarying pattern does not reflect Ekman upwelling. Other upwelling patterns found are timescale dependent. Multiple proxies can improve reconstruction.