the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The SP19 chronology for the South Pole Ice Core – Part 1: volcanic matching and annual layer counting
Dominic A. Winski
Tyler J. Fudge
David G. Ferris
Erich C. Osterberg
John M. Fegyveresi
Jihong Cole-Dai
Zayta Thundercloud
Thomas S. Cox
Karl J. Kreutz
Nikolas Ortman
Christo Buizert
Jenna Epifanio
Edward J. Brook
Ross Beaudette
Jeffrey Severinghaus
Todd Sowers
Eric J. Steig
Emma C. Kahle
Tyler R. Jones
Valerie Morris
Murat Aydin
Melinda R. Nicewonger
Kimberly A. Casey
Richard B. Alley
Edwin D. Waddington
Nels A. Iverson
Nelia W. Dunbar
Ryan C. Bay
Joseph M. Souney
Michael Sigl
Joseph R. McConnell
The South Pole Ice Core (SPICEcore) was drilled in 2014–2016 to provide a detailed multi-proxy archive of paleoclimate conditions in East Antarctica during the Holocene and late Pleistocene. Interpretation of these records requires an accurate depth–age relationship. Here, we present the SPICEcore (SP19) timescale for the age of the ice of SPICEcore. SP19 is synchronized to the WD2014 chronology from the West Antarctic Ice Sheet Divide (WAIS Divide) ice core using stratigraphic matching of 251 volcanic events. These events indicate an age of 54 302±519 BP (years before 1950) at the bottom of SPICEcore. Annual layers identified in sodium and magnesium ions to 11 341 BP were used to interpolate between stratigraphic volcanic tie points, yielding an annually resolved chronology through the Holocene. Estimated timescale uncertainty during the Holocene is less than 18 years relative to WD2014, with the exception of the interval between 1800 to 3100 BP when uncertainty estimates reach ±25 years due to widely spaced volcanic tie points. Prior to the Holocene, uncertainties remain within 124 years relative to WD2014. Results show an average Holocene accumulation rate of 7.4 cm yr−1 (water equivalent). The time variability of accumulation rate is consistent with expectations for steady-state ice flow through the modern spatial pattern of accumulation rate. Time variations in nitrate concentration, nitrate seasonal amplitude and δ15N of N2 in turn are as expected for the accumulation rate variations. The highly variable yet well-constrained Holocene accumulation history at the site can help improve scientific understanding of deposition-sensitive climate proxies such as δ15N of N2 and photolyzed chemical compounds.