Articles | Volume 15, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1223-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1223-2019
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
02 Jul 2019
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 02 Jul 2019

Mid-Holocene climate change over China: model–data discrepancy

Yating Lin, Gilles Ramstein, Haibin Wu, Raj Rani, Pascale Braconnot, Masa Kageyama, Qin Li, Yunli Luo, Ran Zhang, and Zhengtang Guo

Viewed

Total article views: 6,592 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
4,983 1,526 83 6,592 455 76 89
  • HTML: 4,983
  • PDF: 1,526
  • XML: 83
  • Total: 6,592
  • Supplement: 455
  • BibTeX: 76
  • EndNote: 89
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Nov 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 6,592 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,755 with geography defined and 837 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 18 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
The mid-Holocene has been an excellent target for comparing models and data. This work shows that, over China, all the ocean–atmosphere general circulation models involved in PMIP3 show a very large discrepancy with pollen data reconstruction when comparing annual and seasonal temperature. It demonstrates that to reconcile models and data and to capture the signature of seasonal thermal response, it is necessary to integrate non-linear processes, particularly those related to vegetation changes.