Dear Authors,
Thank you for your replies to the comments from the 2 reviewers and myself. There is a lot of detail in both the reviewer comments and your replies, but it is clear that many of these comments will ensure that your arguments and interpretations of these important new data sets will be read correctly. Please submit a corrected version of the manuscript which takes the feedback and your replies into account.
Best wishes,
Erin McClymont

Thank you for your comprehensive response to the reviewers and editors comments. The text and figures have been clarified where concerns were raised, and the Supplementary Information provides additional detail where required. The manuscript will be publishable having addressed two technical corrections noted below.

Technical corrections:
- I would include the analytical precision of your foraminifera stable isotope measurements in Section 2.3 (since you do the same for the bulk carbonate)
- I could not find the stated caveat about the lack of additional records for comparison and the climate/IRD links (reply to Bailey, page 6). Should this be in the final paragraph of Section 4.5 or earlier when discussing the 41 kyr world?