the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Climate change drove Late Miocene to Pliocene rise and fall of C4 vegetation at the crossroads of Africa and Eurasia (Anatolia, Türkiye)
Abstract. Life on Earth has been capitalizing on the C3 photosynthetic pathway for 2.8 billion years. However, in the world’s grasslands that emerged since the Paleogene, C4 vegetation expanded dramatically between 8 and 3 Ma in response to climatic changes. Here we present the first comprehensive Late Miocene to Holocene δ13C soil carbonate record from the Eastern Mediterranean region (Anatolia) to reconstruct long-term geographic distributions of C3 and C4 plants, a region with patchy records compared to parts of Africa and Asia. Our results show a colonization of Anatolian floodplains by C4 biomass by 9.9 Ma, similar to regions in NW and E Africa, followed by a transition from this mixed C3-C4vegetation to C4 dominance between ca. 7.1 Ma and 4.9 Ma. The transition coincides with a similar shift from C3 to C4 vegetation in southern Asia and is generally attributed to the Late Miocene Cooling in response to decreasing atmospheric pCO2. However, the Anatolian paleoecosystem patterns are unique due to a rapid and permanent return to C3 dominance in the Early Pliocene, which is not observed elsewhere and occurs simultaneously with the disappearance of the open environment-adapted large mammal Pikermian chronofauna. We propose that this return to C3 vegetation was caused by paleoclimatic processes that regionally shifted precipitation from the warm to the cool season, resembling the modern Mediterranean climate. In conclusion, changes in rainfall seasonality under subhumid climate, rather than increased aridity, drove the demise of C4-dominated floodplains and the open-environment adapted Pikermian chronofauna at the Eurasian-African crossroads.
- Preprint
(3266 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(77 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 27 Mar 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on cp-2024-80', Funda Akgün, 04 Feb 2025
reply
Dear Editor,
I have read entitled “Climate change drove Late Miocene to Pliocene rise and fall of C4 vegetation at the crossroads of Africa and Eurasia (Anatolia, Türkiye)” detailed in all my good intentions for the study. This study was focused on using duraylı isotope data, mammal and palaeobotany/paleoclimate based on previous studies. It includes major corrections noted on the manuscript (given below). The main problem is that approaches have been made on the Anatolian and Aegean scale based on data from narrow areas with sedimentological characteristics, which are not specified in the results and abstract. The need for narrowing and simplification of these approaches has been tried to be pointed out in the manuscript. In conclusion, this manuscript is suitable for publication in your journal after the major corrections and edits indicated.
Major Corrections:
- Table S2 should be updated as Karacaören- early Pliocene, Bingol-Halifan-late Pliocene, Erzurum-Horosan-late Pliocene (Original Time Slice) as stated in the related manuscript. In the related references, the ages of the samples from these locations are given as listed. Comments and figures related to this correction should be revised.
- It is not clear how the concepts of Plateau and Coastal given in Table S2 are evaluated within the interpretations of the manuscript.
- The locations marked in the Figure 1 are all in Central Anatolia, Rhodes, Ermenek, Adana are in the Mediterranean and Pikermi, and Samos is in the Aegean and Mediterranean belt. Aegean is used for Western and GB Anatolia. For this reason, the term Anatolian-Aegean region should be replaced by another term to include all locations. Otherwise, it is understood that the data used in the manuscript belong to the Aegean region of Anatolia. Also, it is useful to evaluate it later in the manuscript.
- In the Miocene and Pliocene, as in the present day, different microclimatic conditions (such as topography, elevation, distance to the sea, etc.) were effective from region to region within Anatolia. For this reason, the interpretations made in the Aegean region throughout the manucript are confusing due to the inadequacy in the definition of Anatolia-Aegean region.
- The multilayered presence of Central Anatolian volcanic activity must have had a more localized impact on the vegetation in CAP region than the general climatic conditions. The notion that this influence was such that C4 vegetation dominated the whole of Anatolia should be used with caution.
Best regards
Funda AKGÜN
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
114 | 42 | 3 | 159 | 127 | 4 | 3 |
- HTML: 114
- PDF: 42
- XML: 3
- Total: 159
- Supplement: 127
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1