Journal cover Journal topic
Climate of the Past An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 3.536
IF3.536
IF 5-year value: 3.967
IF 5-year
3.967
CiteScore value: 6.6
CiteScore
6.6
SNIP value: 1.262
SNIP1.262
IPP value: 3.90
IPP3.90
SJR value: 2.185
SJR2.185
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 71
Scimago H
index
71
h5-index value: 40
h5-index40
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2020-132
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2020-132
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  07 Oct 2020

07 Oct 2020

Review status
This preprint is currently under review for the journal CP.

Comparison of Holocene temperature reconstructions based on GISP2 multiple-gas-isotope measurements

Michael Döring1,2 and Markus Christian Leuenberger1,2 Michael Döring and Markus Christian Leuenberger
  • 1Climate and Environmental Physics, University of Bern, Switzerland
  • 2Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (OCCR), Bern, Switzerland

Abstract. Nitrogen and argon stable-isotope data extracted from ancient air in ice cores provides the possibility to reconstruct Greenland past temperatures when inverting firn-densification and heat-diffusion models (firn-models) to fit the gas-isotope data (δ15N, δ40Ar, δ15Nexcess). This study uses the Döring and Leuenberger (2018) fitting-algorithm coupled on two state of the art firn-models to fit multiple Holocene gas-isotope data measured on the GISP2 ice core. We present for the first time the resulting temperature estimates when fitting δ15N, δ40Ar and δ15Nexcess as single targets with misfits generally in the low permeg level. Whereas the comparison between the reconstructions using δ15N and δ40Ar shows a high agreement, the use of δ15Nexcess for reconstructing temperature is problematic, due to higher statistical and systematic data uncertainty influencing especially multi-decadal to multi-centennial signals, and results in an unrealistic temperature estimate that differs significantly from the two other reconstructions. We find evidence for systematic too high δ40Ar data in the early- and late-Holocene potentially caused by post coring gas-loss or an insufficient correction of this mechanism. Next, we compare the performance of the Goujon et al. (2003) firn-model and the Schwander et al. (1997) firn-model for Holocene temperature reconstructions. Besides small differences of the reconstructed temperature anomalies – potentially caused by slightly different implementation of firn physics and parameters in the two models – the reconstructed temperature anomalies are highly comparable. We were able to quantify the contribution of the firn-model difference to the uncertainty budget of our reconstruction. Furthermore, the fractions of uncertainty on the reconstructed temperatures, arising from the non-perfect reproducibility of the fitting algorithm and from the remaining final misfits (low permeg level), were quantified. Together with the published measurement uncertainty of the gas-isotope data and the analysis of the impact of accumulation-rate uncertainty on the reconstruction, we were able to calculate the mean uncertainty (2σ) for the nitrogen and the argon based temperature estimates with 2σT = 0.80 ... 0.88 K for T(δ15N), and 2σT = 0.87 ... 1.81 K for T(δ40Ar), respectively. Finally, we compare our reconstructed temperatures to two recent reconstructions based on the same gas-isotope data as used here, but following different reconstruction strategies: first the study of Buizert et al. (2018), which uses a combination of δ18Oice-calibration and δ15N-fitting, and second the study of Kobashi et al. (2017), where δ15Nexcess was fitted in order to conduct the temperature reconstruction. We find generally higher agreement between our T(δ15N) estimate and the Buizert et al. (2018) temperature – in terms of variability and correlation in three investigated periodic-time bands (multi-decadal, multi-centennial and multi-millennial) – as if our T(δ15N) reconstruction is compared to the Kobashi et al. (2017) temperature. However, all three reconstruction strategies lead to distinct temperature realizations.

Michael Döring and Markus Christian Leuenberger

Interactive discussion

Status: open (until 02 Dec 2020)
Status: open (until 02 Dec 2020)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Michael Döring and Markus Christian Leuenberger

Michael Döring and Markus Christian Leuenberger

Viewed

Total article views: 258 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
201 52 5 258 11 2 1
  • HTML: 201
  • PDF: 52
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 258
  • Supplement: 11
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Oct 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 151 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 150 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved

No saved metrics found.

Discussed

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 24 Oct 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We analyze Holocene temperatures reconstructed from gas-stable-isotope species measured on ancient air extracted from a Greenland ice core. Also, we compare two state of the art firn-models which are needed for the inversion of the gas-isotope data to paleo-temperature and provide detailed uncertainty estimations for the reconstructed temperature estimates. Finally, we compare our reconstructed temperatures to two recent reconstructions based on the same gas-isotope data as used here.
We analyze Holocene temperatures reconstructed from gas-stable-isotope species measured on...
Citation