Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/cpd-10-4535-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/cpd-10-4535-2014
15 Dec 2014
 | 15 Dec 2014
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Technical Note: Are large error bars desirable? A note on quantitative model-proxy comparison

J. Liakka, J. T. Eronen, H. Tang, and F. T. Portmann

Abstract. The combined use of proxy records and climate modelling is invaluable for obtaining a better understanding of past climates. However, many methods of model-proxy comparison in the literature are fundamentally problematic because larger errors in the proxy tend to yield a "better" agreement with the model. Here we quantify model-proxy agreement as a function to proxy uncertainty using the overlapping coefficient OVL, which measures the similarity between two probability distributions. We found that the model-proxy agreement is poor (OVL < 50%) if the proxy uncertainty (σp) is greater than three times the model variability (σm), even if the model and proxy have similar mean estimates. Hence only proxies that fulfil the condition σp < 3σm should be used for detailed quantitative evaluation of the model performance.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

J. Liakka, J. T. Eronen, H. Tang, and F. T. Portmann

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
J. Liakka, J. T. Eronen, H. Tang, and F. T. Portmann
J. Liakka, J. T. Eronen, H. Tang, and F. T. Portmann

Viewed

Total article views: 1,715 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,039 359 317 1,715 64 95
  • HTML: 1,039
  • PDF: 359
  • XML: 317
  • Total: 1,715
  • BibTeX: 64
  • EndNote: 95
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Dec 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Dec 2014)

Saved

Latest update: 14 Apr 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.