<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">CP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Climate of the Past</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">CP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Clim. Past</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1814-9332</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/cp-22-1223-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>The Marine Isotopic Stage 7: a relic of the “41 ka world”? Perspectives from a global-scale sea-surface temperature synthesis</article-title><alt-title>The Marine Isotopic Stage 7: a relic of the “41 ka world”?</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Legrain</surname><given-names>Etienne</given-names></name>
          <email>etienne.legrain@vub.be</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7446-0718</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Stevenard</surname><given-names>Nathan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1838-9291</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Capron</surname><given-names>Emilie</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0784-1884</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Parrenin</surname><given-names>Frédéric</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9489-3991</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Vazquez Riveiros</surname><given-names>Natalia</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7513-153X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, Grenoble, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Water and Climate, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Laboratoire de Glaciologie, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Geo-Ocean, UMR 6538, CNRS/Université de Bretagne Occidentale/Ifremer, Plouzané, France</institution>
        </aff><author-comment content-type="econtrib"><p>These authors contributed equally to this work.</p></author-comment>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Etienne Legrain (etienne.legrain@vub.be)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>1223</fpage><lpage>1240</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>November</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>November</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>9</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Etienne Legrain et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1223/2026/cp-22-1223-2026.html">This article is available from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1223/2026/cp-22-1223-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1223/2026/cp-22-1223-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1223/2026/cp-22-1223-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e141">The Marine Isotope Stage 7 (MIS 7, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 245–190 ka) displays an unusual morphology compared to the other interglacials of the late Pleistocene. It comprises two major warm periods (MIS 7e and MIS 7c) each preceded by multi-millennial-scale warming intervals (Termination III (TIII) and TIIIa, respectively) and separated by a brief return to glacial conditions (MIS 7d). When considered as two distinct warm phases, MIS 7 has been compared to the 41 ka obliquity-driven climate cycles of the pre-mid-Pleistocene transition (MPT) world. However, a coherent spatio-temporal picture of MIS 7 surface temperature remains lacking to enable a comprehensive comparison with other interglacials. Here we compiled 132 high-resolution (better than 4 ka) sea surface temperature (SST) records derived from 85 marine sites over the time interval 260–190 ka. In order to provide a spatio-temporal comparison of these records, we (i) align them on a common temporal framework relying on the AICC2023 reference ice core chronology and (ii) recompute SSTs using a homogenized proxy-calibration, both steps applying Bayesian and Monte Carlo approaches to quantify the attached uncertainty. Finally, we produce global and regional stacks of SST anomalies relative to the pre-industrial covering TIII and the following MIS 7.</p>

      <p id="d2e151">Our results evidence that global mean surface temperature remains below pre-industrial (PI) values over both MIS 7e (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 °C) and MIS 7c (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 °C) periods. The warmest phase across MIS 7 occurs during the MIS 7c substage, although the global surface temperature difference compared to MIS 7e is within uncertainty of the reconstruction (around 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 °C warmer). MIS 7c is a period when atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations are 30 ppm lower than during MIS 7e. This result illustrates a transient decoupling between radiative forcing and the global surface temperature response during periods of CO<sub>2</sub> overshoot, after which global temperature re-equilibrate with CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations. In addition, TIII exhibits a greater warming amplitude than TIIIa, both globally and regionally. The spatial and temporal dynamics of the two terminations differ markedly. TIII follows a “classic” sequential deglaciation pattern, with an early warming initiated in the Southern Hemisphere, which then gradually propagates toward the Northern Hemisphere. In contrast, TIIIa displays near-synchronous warming across all latitudes, lacking the interhemispheric pattern typical of classical terminations. This suggests that TIIIa is not a standard glacial termination, but rather a distinct climatic transition likely caused by the most extreme obliquity values of the Pleistocene occurring over this period. We therefore propose that TIIIa is the result of a self-sustained climatic oscillation that temporarily re-synchronised to the 41 ka cycles because of an exceptional orbital context. As a result, MIS 7 represents a hybrid interglacial, embedded within the post-MPT 100 ka framework, yet shaped by obliquity-driven forcing such as during the early Pleistocene.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Agence Nationale de la Recherche</funding-source>
<award-id>ANR-19-MPGA-0001</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Belgian Federal Science Policy Office</funding-source>
<award-id>FROID</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek</funding-source>
<award-id>CAPSULE</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e226">Interglacial periods of the Pleistocene are characterized by a wide diversity of external orbital forcing, ice-sheet configurations, atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, and global-to-regional climate patterns (Lang and Wolff, 2011; Past Interglacials Working Group of PAGES, 2016; Tzedakis et al., 2009). This diversity offers a unique opportunity to investigate the mechanisms driving the establishment of warm climates under different boundary conditions. Global-scale syntheses of multi-archive-based surface temperature records rely on harmonized paleorecords from different regions across the Earth, which is essential to investigate the spatio-temporal evolution of climate changes. Such approach has been applied to the current interglacial (the Holocene), the last interglacial (Marine Isotope Stage 5e, MIS 5e), MIS 9, and MIS 11, as well as to their respective preceding Termination I (TI), TII, TIV and TV, relying on the abundance of highly resolved paleoclimate records spanning these intervals (Capron et al., 2014; Hoffman et al., 2017; Milker et al., 2013; Osman et al., 2021; Stevenard et al., 2025). Furthermore, they offer key comparative insights into present-day climate dynamics and establish benchmarks for climate model simulations to enable robust data–model comparisons (e.g. Capron et al., 2017; Gao et al., 2025; Hoffman et al., 2017). MIS 5, MIS 11 and MIS 9 stand out as warm interglacials of the last 800 ka and are representative of the late Pleistocene interglacials occurring after the Mid-Pleistocene Transition (MPT, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2–0.7 Ma; Berends et al., 2021a; Past Interglacials Working Group of PAGES, 2016). In contrast, MIS 7 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 245–190 ka) remains relatively understudied, in part due to its weaker climatic optimum compared to other late Pleistocene interglacials, making it less relevant than MIS 5 or MIS 11 to inform on the state of the Earth system components in a warmer-than pre-industrial (PI) context.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e245">Left: MIS 7 shown within the context of the past 2 million years. From top to bottom: <bold>(a)</bold> precession (black), eccentricity (grey) (Laskar et al., 2004), <bold>(b)</bold> obliquity (Laskar et al., 2004), <bold>(c)</bold> June insolation at 65° N (Laskar et al., 2004), and <bold>(d)</bold> the benthic LR04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O stack (Lisiecki and Raymo, 2005). The grey box highlights TIII and MIS7. The shaded area marks the interval of the Mid-Pleistocene Transition. Dashed horizontal lines indicate the maximum and minimum orbital values (precession evaluated over 800–0 ka; obliquity and June 65° N insolation over 2000–0 ka). All of these extrema occur during the MIS 7 interval. Colour coding: black shows the precession extrema over the last 800 ka, grey corresponds to obliquity extrema over the past 2 Ma, and yellow represents the minimum June 65° N insolation over the past 2 Ma. Right: Orbital and climatic datasets spanning 260–190 ka. From top to bottom: <bold>(e)</bold> eccentricity (dotted) and precession (solid) (Laskar et al., 2004), <bold>(f)</bold> obliquity (Laskar et al., 2004), <bold>(g)</bold> June insolation at 65° N (Laskar et al., 2004), <bold>(h)</bold> global ice-volume estimates expressed as sea-level equivalents from Berends et al. (2021b) (purple) and Spratt and Lisiecki (2016) (pink), <bold>(i)</bold> atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> record from the EPICA Dome C ice core (EDC) (Legrain et al., 2024), <bold>(j)</bold> Greenland synthetic temperature curve GLT_syn (Barker et al., 2011), <bold>(k)</bold> Atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> record from EDC (Legrain et al., 2024; Loulergue et al., 2008), and <bold>(l)</bold> EDC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D record (Jouzel et al., 2007). Ice core records are aligned onto the AICC2023 chronology (Bouchet et al., 2023). The colored shaded areas help to identify the different climatic periods discussed in this study, but do not correspond to a strict definition. We acknowledge that these boundaries are arbitrary, but they are only used here to clarify reference to the climatic intervals throughout the manuscript.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1223/2026/cp-22-1223-2026-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e328">The structure of MIS 7 is well documented in the Antarctic ice core archive, through both local temperature proxies (Landais et al., 2021; Watanabe et al., 2023) and global atmospheric greenhouse gas reconstructions (Legrain et al., 2024; Loulergue et al., 2008; Petit et al., 1999) (Fig. 1i, j). It is also recorded in a variety of marine and continental proxy records (e.g. Desprat et al., 2006; Martrat et al., 2007; Roucoux et al., 2008; Wendt et al., 2021). MIS 7 follows TIII and is composed of several sub-stages, starting with the warm stage MIS 7e, which is marked by an abrupt onset and coincides with an overshoot in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations (Legrain et al., 2024). This phase is followed by a return to glacial conditions during MIS 7d, characterized by low CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations characteristic of a full glacial period (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 ppm, Legrain et al., 2024). Subsequently, a major warming event occurs, referred to as TIIIa, around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 218 ka, leading into the warm stage MIS 7c. The amplitude of TIIIa in Antarctic surface temperature and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> records is smaller than that of the preceding TIII (Jouzel et al., 2007; Legrain et al., 2024). However, regional climate reconstructions based on pollen and biogenic silica suggest that the climatic response during TIIIa was comparable to, or even exceeded, that of TIII (Prokopenko et al., 2006; Roucoux et al., 2008). Due to its relatively modest CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations, MIS 7c has occasionally been excluded from interglacial lists under stricter CO<sub>2</sub>-based definitions (Tzedakis et al., 2009, 2012). However, under sea-level and benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O criteria, it is classified as a distinct interglacial (Past Interglacials Working Group of PAGES, 2016). This period concludes with a short and relatively poorly marked stage MIS 7b. Finally, the climate system enters a third warm interval, MIS 7a, before gradually transitioning into the full glacial conditions of MIS 6 around 190 ka. Depending on the resolution and geographical location of the records, MIS 7a and MIS 7c may not be distinguished. Consequently, we considered MIS 7c, MIS 7b and MIS 7a as a single interval referred to as MIS 7c in the discussion section.</p>
      <p id="d2e403">Global ice-volume variations during MIS 7 remain poorly constrained (Dutton et al., 2009; Lea et al., 2002; Siddall et al., 2003; Spratt and Lisiecki, 2016). Conceptual models driven solely by orbital forcing struggle to replicate the various data-derived ice volume reconstructions, capturing only part of the complexity of the climatic sequence (Imbrie et al., 2011; Legrain et al., 2023; Parrenin and Paillard, 2012). The relative influence of orbital vs. greenhouse gases forcings has also been investigated using more sophisticated physical models (Choudhury et al., 2020; Colleoni et al., 2014; Ganopolski and Brovkin, 2017).</p>
      <p id="d2e406">The complex structure of MIS 7, characterized by a double warm peak, differs from the other recent interglacials (Fig. 1). Because of its relatively cold temperature optimum and its two-peaks morphology, MIS 7 has been compared to the pre-MPT cycles, characterized by a 41 ka periodicity and a relatively low amplitude (Tzedakis et al., 2012; Watanabe et al., 2023). The occurrence of the two-peaks during MIS 7, among of the single-peak interglacials MIS 1, MIS 5, MIS 9 and MIS 11 remains unexplained, although it is suspected to be linked to the exceptional amplitude of orbital variations during this period (Tzedakis et al., 2012, 2017) (Fig. 1a, b, c). Given this pattern of climatic variability, MIS 7 provides an excellent framework for examining how the climate responds at both regional and global scales, as well as how these responses relate to orbital forcing and the carbon cycle. The variety of global and regional climate signals recorded during MIS 7, along with the need to identify their respective drivers, calls for an approach that accounts for the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of the warming, as performed in syntheses for the other interglacials (e.g. Capron et al., 2014; Hoffman et al., 2017; Stevenard et al., 2025). To date, only few syntheses have compiled sea surface temperature (SST) records spanning this period (e.g. Clark et al., 2024; Lang and Wolff, 2011; Shakun et al., 2015; Snyder, 2016). However, these syntheses rely on a limited number of paleoclimatic records and primarily target longer timescales (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 800 000 years). Hence, they are largely composed of low-resolution (albeit temporally extensive) records that are aligned to the LR04 benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O stack, which was dated through orbital tuning. By focusing on MIS 7 and Termination III, a larger number of higher-resolution records can be aligned within a more robust chronological framework, thereby enabling a more detailed characterization of the spatio-temporal variability in surface temperature during this interval.</p>
      <p id="d2e427">In this study, we provide the first SST compilation focused on the MIS 7 and TIII interval in which surface temperature records are aligned on a unified chronological framework. Relying on this synthesis, we (i) assess how the magnitude of warming varied spatially between TIII and TIIIa and between MIS 7e and 7c, (ii) describe the temporal evolution of sea-surface temperatures across major ocean basins, and (iii) place MIS 7 within the broader context of Pleistocene climate cycles.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Material and methods</title>
      <p id="d2e438">The methods used for the SST synthesis construction and the stacking over TIII and MIS 7 are identical to those employed in Stevenard et al. (2025), which focused on TIV and MIS 9. Below is a summary of the main steps, while a detailed description of the methodology and calibration modelling choices can be found in Stevenard et al. (2025).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Selection of paleoclimatic data sites</title>
      <p id="d2e448">We compiled 132 SST records from 85 marine cores spanning the 260–190 ka interval (Fig. 2). We apply a threshold resolution filter of 4 ka, leading to an average resolution of 1.7 ka for the whole dataset. 106 and 26 of the records represent annual and seasonal temperatures, respectively. Four different SST proxies are included in the synthesis: the alkenone unsaturation index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the Modern Analog Technique (MAT) relying on faunal microfossil assemblages, the ratio of magnesium to calcium (Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca) and the oxygen isotope (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>p</sub>) of planktic foraminifera (Fig. 2). Table S1 compiles all details of the selected records.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e497">Location and latitudinal distribution of SST records. Left: Distribution of the records per 5° latitude bins. Right: SST reconstructions based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (orange), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>p</sub> (blue), Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca (pink) and Modern Analog Technique (MAT) (brown).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1223/2026/cp-22-1223-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>SST calibrations</title>
      <p id="d2e558">Following the approach developed in Stevenard et al. (2025), we recalibrate the original SST records applying a Bayesian approach.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e563">Sensitivity tests on the stacking procedure. <bold>(a–e)</bold> Stacks built from selected SST records (15 records excluded, chosen version for this study); <bold>(f–j)</bold> stacks including all annual records. <bold>(k–o)</bold> Stacks excluding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>p</sub>-based SST records. <bold>(a, f, k)</bold> Global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GSST (light blue) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST (dark blue) stacks; <bold>(b, g, l)</bold> Hemispheric heat transfer (black line), computed as the Northern Hemisphere minus Southern Hemisphere temperature stacks. <bold>(c, h, m)</bold> hemispheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>SST stacks for the Northern Hemisphere (blue), Tropics (yellow), and Southern Hemisphere (red); <bold>(d, i, n)</bold> Atlantic and Indian Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>SST stacks for the North (blue), South (red) Atlantic and Indian Ocean (yellow); <bold>(e, j, o)</bold> Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>SST stacks for the North (blue), Equatorial (yellow), and South (red) Pacific.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1223/2026/cp-22-1223-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e653">To calibrate the 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> records, we applied a Bayesian calibration with a prior standard deviation of 5 °C using the BAYSPLINE Matlab package that produced a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> matrix of SST possibilities for each age <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Tierney and Tingley, 2018). The 22 Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca records are calibrated with a Bayesian calibration using the BAYMAG Matlab package (Tierney et al., 2019), applying a prior standard deviation of 6 °C (Osman et al., 2021). The seawater salinity and pH estimates are defined with a modified function from Gray and Evans (2019) and using the benthic stack LR04 (Lisiecki and Raymo, 2005) as reference for sea-level changes. This calibration produces a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca matrix of SST possibilities for each age <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> then randomly subsampled to produce a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> matrix. To calibrate the 55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>p</sub> records, we used the BAYFOX Matlab package, applying a Bayesian calibration with a prior standard deviation of 10 °C that produced a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>p</sub> matrix of SST possibilities for each age <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Malevich et al., 2019). The prior sea water d<sup>18</sup>O values were estimated from the Breitkreuz et al. (2018) database and the ice-volume correction use the benthic LR04 stack (Lisiecki and Raymo, 2005) as reference. We decided to include <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>p</sub>, although this proxy reflects both temperature and hydrographic changes, notably variations in seawater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O linked to salinity. While we correct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>p</sub> for seawater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, SST estimates derived from this proxy should still be interpreted with caution. We therefore also provide alternative global and regional stacks excluding these records from the synthesis (Fig. 3). To our knowledge, no Bayesian approach has been developed for MAT calibrations. We propagate the uncertainties of the 28 MAT records applying a Monte-Carlo analysis creating 1000 scenarios for each data point that follows a normal distribution based on the uncertainty <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> provided in the original publications. If this error (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) was not published in the original publications, we estimated it as the standard deviation of the SST record over the period 260–190 ka period. To be consistent with other approaches, the ensemble of MAT records is a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> matrix.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Anomaly from the pre-industrial period</title>
      <p id="d2e905">Following approaches developed in previous interglacial syntheses, the SST records are transferred into anomaly compared to the pre-industrial (PI) (e.g. Capron et al., 2014; Hoffman et al., 2017; Osman et al., 2021; Stevenard et al., 2025). As most of the records have no core-top data indicative of recent SST, PI-SST are derived from the HadISST database (Rayner et al., 2003) over the 1870–1899 interval (Capron et al., 2017; Stevenard et al., 2025). These PI-SST were forward modelled to estimate a proxy-value relative to the PI-SST, and then recalibrate using the Bayesian calibrations described above to propagate the proxy-based SST uncertainties for the PI period (Osman et al., 2021; Stevenard et al., 2025).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Chronologies</title>
      <p id="d2e917">In this study, we harmonize the chronologies of marine sediment records using a three-step approach based on alignment to ice core and speleothems records, and Bayesian modelling (Stevenard et al., 2025). All alignments are performed with the <italic>AnalySeries</italic> software (Paillard et al., 1996). We apply a strategy similar to previous syntheses by aligning high-latitude basin reference records to surface air temperature reconstructions from Antarctic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D of EPICA Dome C) and Greenland ice cores (Hoffman et al., 2017; Stevenard et al., 2025; Vázquez Riveiros et al., 2010). At Site U1429 (the reference for Northwest Pacific), we synchronized the planktic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O_notched record of G. ruber, which is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O signal with eccentricity- and obliquity-band components removed (Clemens et al., 2018) interpreted as a proxy for East Asian monsoon variability, with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>calcite</sub> stack from the Sanbao Cave (Cheng et al., 2016). The Sanbao <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>calcite</sub> series was already been placed on the AICC2023 timescale by linear interpolation between the tie points defined by Bouchet et al. (2023). For Greenland, where direct surface air temperature reconstructions are unavailable beyond 130 ka, we use the synthetic temperature curve GLT_syn (Barker et al., 2011). We do not use directly the CH<sub>4</sub> records as the terrestrial biosphere response to hydroclimatic changes in lower latitudes may affect the CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations and decoupled them from Northern Hemisphere sea surface temperature changes at high latitudes (Kleinen et al., 2023). Despite some millennial-scale discrepancies with CH<sub>4</sub> and Greenland isotope records, GLT_syn provides a practical reference for northern high-latitude temperature and has been widely used to align marine records with ice-core chronologies (e.g., Barker et al., 2015; Hodell et al., 2023). Then, every record in an oceanic basin is aligned to the reference record through benthic foraminifera <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O record. In case of absence or low-resolution of a benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O record, the SST is directly aligned on the ice core record for high-latitude sites (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40° N or S), or to the closest already-aligned record for low-latitude sites (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40° N or S). Then, the age and depth uncertainties associated with the alignment are merged into a single age uncertainty through a Bayesian approach (10<sup>5</sup> iterations) using the “<italic>Undatable</italic>” software (Lougheed and Obrochta, 2019) with a <italic>xfactor</italic> of 0.1 and no bootstrap. The absolute age uncertainty is estimated by calculating the quadratic sum of all uncertainties (i.e. alignment, basin reference, and ice-core). To build the final chronology of each marine sediment core, we run a final Bayesian age-depth model with the absolute uncertainty, 10<sup>5</sup> iterations, a <italic>xfactor</italic> of 0.1 and 15 % of bootstrap through each iteration (Stevenard et al., 2025). Finally, each original SST record corresponds to an ensemble of 1000 probable ages (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> matrix) directly or indirectly aligned to the AICC2023 ice-core chronology (Bouchet et al., 2023).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Global and regional stack reconstructions</title>
      <p id="d2e1105">To estimate global SST anomalies during MIS 7, we used the “<italic>sststack</italic>” Python package (Stevenard et al., 2025) built to facilitate the stacking of ensemble-based SST. It includes the Monte Carlo approach detailed in Stevenard et al. (2025). The ensemble of both age and SST is redrawn to ensure that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th age-SST pairs are different for each iteration. To reduce spatial bias, we apply a three-step averaging procedure within each Monte Carlo iteration and for each 500-year time bin: (1) we first average all SST ensemble values available at each site, regardless the proxy type; (2) we then average these site means within a randomly defined spatial grid (grid size randomly selected between 2 and 5°); and (3) we finally average the gridded values within randomly defined latitudinal bands (band width randomly selected between 2.5 and 10°). Global and regional SST stacks at hemispheric (North, Tropics, South) and ocean-basin scales (North Atlantic, North Pacific, Equatorial Pacific, South Atlantic, Indian Ocean and South Pacific) were calculated at each iteration. All stacks were defined as the weighted mean of all latitudinal band averages, with each band weighted according to its proportional surface area (i.e., cosine of latitude). The global mean surface air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST) is defined as the global SST anomaly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GSST) using a random factor (1.5–2.3) derived from climate model comparisons (Osman et al., 2021; Snyder, 2016; Stevenard et al., 2025). As no sites are located north or south of 60°, polar amplification is not directly represented in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GSST stacks, which therefore reflect extrapolar mean conditions, whereas it is only accounted for in the derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST reconstruction. This Monte Carlo process is repeated 10 000 times to ensure the propagation of all uncertainties.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Sensitivity tests of global and regional stacks</title>
      <p id="d2e1163">Based on the specific description of individual records (Sect. S1 in the Supplement, Figs. S1, S2 ,S3), we identified discrepancies among SST reconstructions from the same sites (i.e., using different proxies) and, in some cases, within the general trends of a given region. Most inconsistencies are associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>p</sub>- and, to a lesser extent, Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca-derived SSTs. This observation has also been made in the MIS 9 synthesis from .Stevenard et al. (2025) and likely reflects a lack of environmental constraints used for calibrations. To assess the influence of these records on the stacking procedure, we performed three sensitivity tests: (1) including all annual SST records (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 106); (2) excluding all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>p</sub>-based SST reconstructions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 56), which may yield lower temperature estimates or distinct variability patterns; and (3) retaining only records showing consistent amplitude and/or variability within the same region, resulting in the exclusion of 15 records (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 91), mostly derived from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>p</sub> and Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca proxies (Fig. 3). The selection in this third test was based on visual assessment, and the list of excluded record is given in the Supplement (Sect. S1.8).</p>
      <p id="d2e1284">Overall, the resulting stacks exhibit highly consistent variability across the different tests, independent of the method applied. At both global and hemispheric scales, the amplitude and timing of the main climatic features (e.g., glacial inception, glacial termination and interglacial optimum) remain virtually unchanged. As in the MIS 9 synthesis (Stevenard et al., 2025), the absence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>p</sub> shifted South Atlantic and Indian Ocean stacks towards warmer value (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 to 3 °C). The tests including all records (1) and the one only excluding 15 selected records (3) are very similar, with temperature slightly colder for the “all records” stacks (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3 °C in average for GMST and GSST stacks). The main regional difference occurs in the Equatorial and Northern Pacific with a more pronounced (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 °C) and better-defined MIS 7e in the “selected” record stacks. This result confirms the potential bias of proxies influenced by other parameters than sea surface temperature (e.g. water salinity) in region where water properties can change drastically due to regional climate (e.g. monsoon events).</p>
      <p id="d2e1328">Excluding all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>p</sub>-based SST records (2) nearly halves the number of available records and reduces the spatial coverage of the synthesis prior to stacking, particularly in the South Atlantic sector of the Southern Hemisphere. The “selected” stack (3) represents a compromise approach. Records were excluded only when they displayed trends markedly inconsistent with regional patterns, while most of the available data were retained. The similarity between the “all records” (1) and “selected” stacks indicates that the main large-scale features, structure, and timing of MIS 7 are robust to the choice of compilation. We therefore use the “selected” stack as our primary reference for description and interpretation, while making all three stacking approaches (“all”, “selected”, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>p</sub>-excluded) available to allow explicit assessment of the sensitivity of the results to proxy selection.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Basin scale</title>
      <p id="d2e1379">The regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>SST stacks (Fig. 4e) of the different oceanic basins show marked differences in the timing and magnitude of MIS 7 at regional scale: their structure can vary from a structure associated to three temperature peaks clearly identified as the warm substages MIS 7e, 7c and 7a (e.g. North Atlantic) to a signal with low-amplitude (e.g. Equatorial Pacific).</p>

      <fig id="F4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e1391">Global and regional records over MIS 7 and Termination III. From top to bottom: <bold>(a)</bold> Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations (red dots) measured in the EDC ice core (Legrain et al., 2024). <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST (dark blue) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GSST (light blue). <bold>(c)</bold> Hemispheric heat transfer (black line), computed as the Northern Hemisphere minus Southern Hemisphere temperature stacks. <bold>(d)</bold> Northern Hemisphere (blue), tropics (yellow) and southern Hemisphere (red) temperature stacks. <bold>(e)</bold> Basin temperature stacks: North Atlantic (blue), Indian Ocean (yellow), South Atlantic (red). <bold>(f)</bold> Basin temperature stacks: North Pacific (blue), Equatorial Pacific (yellow), South Pacific (red). All stacks records have been realized with the annual records of the synthesis, at the exception of 15 excluded records (see methods). Colored envelopes are 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> interval of the corresponding stacks.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1223/2026/cp-22-1223-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1449">During TIII and the following MIS 7e, all basins show a marked warming trend from preceding glacial conditions, though the amplitude and timing of the peak vary. The North Atlantic exhibits the strongest and most abrupt SST rise, reaching PI values, with a TIII amplitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 °C (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, here and after) (Figs. 4e and 5) and displays a sharp peak centered around 240 ka. In the South Atlantic and South Pacific, MIS 7e is also well-expressed, but the TIII occurs earlier than in the rest of the basins, around 254 ka, and is slightly lower in amplitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 °C) compared to North Atlantic. The Indian Ocean also registers a major warming (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 °C) but with a significant delay, with MIS 7e peak registered around 236 ka. In contrast, the Equatorial and North Pacific basins reveal a less intense warming (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 °C, respectively), with MIS 7e expressed as a colder broad plateau (Fig. 4f).</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e1548">Termination amplitude and warm phases intensity. Amplitude of the temperature change over TIII (dark red) and TIIIa (red) for the GSST stack and regional basin stacks. Difference of interstadials intensity (yellow). Errors bars correspond to 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1223/2026/cp-22-1223-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1564">The MIS 7d cold period is expressed as a distinct cooling in the North Atlantic and South Pacific, with SSTs dropping by 3 °C, marking the two most abrupt stadial onsets in the regional stacks. This cooling is also evident in the South Atlantic, North Pacific and Indian Ocean but occurs more gradually and with reduced amplitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 °C). In the Equatorial Pacific, MIS 7d appears as a subtle inflection of 1 °C (Fig. 4e, f).</p>
      <p id="d2e1574">The MIS7d is then interrupted by the TIIIa. In general, TIIIa is characterized by a less pronounced warming than TIII, except in the North Pacific, where the temperature rise during TIIIa exceeds that of TIII by 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 °C. During TIIIa, the North Atlantic and the North Pacific exhibits the stronger SST rise, starting at 222ka (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 °C respectively) and culminating at around 214 ka. In the four other basins, the warming is of lower amplitude (ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 °C in South Atlantic to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 °C in South Pacific) (Fig. 4f).</p>
      <p id="d2e1641">The following climate optimum corresponds to the MIS 7c. In the North Atlantic, MIS 7c is comparable in magnitude to MIS 7e (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>7e–c <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 °C), though more prolonged (Fig. 5). In the North Pacific (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 °C) and in the Equatorial pacific (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 °C), MIS 7c is the most prominent substage during MIS 7. In the South Atlantic, South Pacific, and Indian Ocean, MIS 7c peak is colder than MIS 7e (0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4, 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 and 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 °C respectively).</p>
      <p id="d2e1723">During MIS 7b, the oceanic basins registered varying degrees of cooling. The North Atlantic and North Pacific shows a clear and rapid SST decline with an identifiable minimum (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.4 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 °C, respectively), while South Pacific exhibit a smoother, more gradual decrease (Fig. 4e, f). The Indian Ocean shows only a weak inflection, and MIS 7b is almost absent in the South Atlantic (Fig. 4e). The Equatorial Pacific maintained an almost flat profile until 190 ka.</p>
      <p id="d2e1740">MIS 7a is the least consistently expressed of the three warm periods. The North Atlantic, North Pacific and South Pacific exhibit a small but coherent SST rebound following MIS 7b (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.4, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4 °C respectively) though its amplitude is much lower than during TIII and TIIIa. In the Indian Ocean, South Atlantic, and Equatorial Pacific, the signal is barely distinguishable (Fig. 4e).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Hemispheric scale</title>
      <p id="d2e1772">Here we present the results from the extra-tropical Northern Hemisphere stack (North of 23° N, referred to as Northern Hemisphere stack after), the extra-tropical Southern Hemisphere stack (South of 23° S, referred to as Southern Hemisphere stack after) and the Tropics stack (between 23° N and 23° S).</p>
      <p id="d2e1775">The amplitude of TIII is larger in the Southern Hemisphere (3.0 °C) than in the Northern Hemisphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.4 °C) and the Tropics (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.1 °C), and the only MIS 7 SST values exceeding PI are in the Southern Hemisphere during MIS 7e (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 °C) (Figs. 4e, 5).</p>
      <p id="d2e1806">The hemispheric and tropical SST stacks reveal a clear phasing pattern during Termination III and MIS 7e (Fig. 4d). Deglacial warming begins in the Southern Hemisphere around 254 ka and subsequently propagates to the tropical region (warming starting at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 251 ka), with the Northern Hemisphere starting to warm last (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 246 ka). The MIS 7e optimum is reached first in the Southern Hemisphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 244 ka), then in the Northern Hemisphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 240 ka) and finally in the Tropics (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 236 ka). In contrast, no such temporal offset is observed during Termination IIIa, as all regions appear to both initiate warming and reach the optimum synchronously (at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 222.5 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 214 ka respectively). This phasing difference between TIII and TIIIa is illustrated with the Interhemispheric heat transfer reconstruction, computed as the Northern Hemisphere stack – Southern Hemisphere stack (Fig. 4c). It appears clearly that only the period of TIII registered the large interhemispheric temperature difference (up to 3 °C) characteristic from Terminations, consequent to the delayed warming of Northern Hemisphere associated with a weak AMOC during TIII.</p>
      <p id="d2e1859">The MIS 7d cold period is very pronounced in both hemispheres, with SSTs dropping by 2 °C (SH) and 2.5 °C (NH), compared to the tropics, while average SSTs decrease by 0.9 °C. MIS 7c evidences similar temperature between Northern and Southern Hemisphere, with MIS 7c slightly warmer than MIS 7e in the Northern Hemisphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 °C) and Tropics region (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 °C), whereas MIS 7c is colder in the Southern Hemisphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 °C) (Fig. 4d).</p>
      <p id="d2e1906">Regarding the final stages of MIS 7, only the Northern Hemisphere exhibits a well-defined tripartite interglacial structure (MIS 7e, 7c, 7a), while MIS 7a remains indistinct in both the tropical and Southern Hemisphere stacks.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Global scale</title>
      <p id="d2e1917">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GSST and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST stacks are characterized by a clear two-peak morphology, with prominent interglacials during MIS 7e and MIS 7c. A third warm period, MIS 7a, is also present but expressed with less intensity (Fig. 4b).</p>
      <p id="d2e1934">TIII has an amplitude of 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 °C in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GSST stack and of 4.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 °C in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST stack, starting at 253.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 ka. Optimum temperatures during MIS 7e are reached at 240.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 ka and remain below PI values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 °C). MIS 7d is characterized by a temperature drop of 1.3 and 2.5 °C in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GSST and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST stacks. MIS 7c appears comparable to, or slightly warmer than MIS 7e (about 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 °C warmer), but remains significantly below pre-industrial levels, with peak anomalies compared to PI of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 °C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GSST) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 °C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST) during the climate optimum at 214.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 ka. Reversely, the amplitude of TIIIa, preceding MIS 7c, is reduced compared to TIII, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>T differences between the TIIIa and TIII of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 °C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GSST) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1 °C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST), respectively (Fig. 5). It illustrates a much warmer MIS 7d compared to MIS 8 (by 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 °C in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GSST, respectively). MIS 7a is characterized by a temporary warm rebound of less than 0.2 °C in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GSST stacks. At 199.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 ka, GMST and GSST stacks initiate a cooling leading to MIS 6.</p>
      <p id="d2e2187">The comparison of MIS 7e and MIS 7c with atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations (Fig. 4a) reveals contrasting signals between atmospheric radiative forcing and surface temperature response. In the GMST and GSST stacks, MIS 7c is of similar intensity or slightly warmer than MIS 7e (with 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 and 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 °C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GSST positive anomaly compared to MIS7e). In contrast, the atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> record shows a higher maximum concentration during MIS 7e (275 ppm) than during MIS 7c (245 ppm).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Limitations and contextualization of the synthesis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>4.1.1</label><title>Limitations of the study</title>
      <p id="d2e2260">This synthesis was constructed using the same approach and methodology as the MIS 9 surface temperature synthesis by Stevenard et al. (2025). As a result, all approach and methodology-related limitations are similar, and are summarized in the points below: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e2265">Significant discrepancies observed between records from the same site but reconstructed using different proxies represent a major limitation in the interpretation of our SST synthesis during MIS 7. These differences, sometimes substantial, affect both the temporal structure of the variations and the absolute temperature values. These observations can arise (i) from the proxy itself which can integrate other parameters than surface temperature variations (ii) not be representative of the same water depth or (iii) from the Bayesian methodology applied to reconstructed temperature from these proxies. While this limitation is important, it is partially mitigated by the use of intra-basin regional stacks, which help minimizing interpretations based on a single core while providing an analysis of regional trends.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e2269">The use of PI SST reference from the HadISST database (Rayner et al., 2003) can be questioned. Although well-constrained for the PI period, recent comparisons by Gao et al. (2025) show that model-data differences in the Southern high latitudes can reach <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 °C. This uncertainty may bias the absolute anomaly values reported here. However, all other interpretations than comparison with PI is not affected by this bias.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e2280">This study uses Bayesian methods and Monte Carlo processes to account for uncertainties and produce continuous SST reconstructions. However, uneven spatial coverage, particularly in the Pacific, Indian Ocean, Nordic Seas, and Western Atlantic, may distort latitudinal trends. While this limitation is inherent to all stacking procedures (e.g., Clark et al., 2024; Shakun et al., 2015; Tierney et al., 2020), the stacking process developed in this study aimed to minimize this limitation (Stevenard et al., 2025).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e2284">Differences in the timing of temperature changes across regions, especially during deglaciations and the interglacial peaks, lead to a smoothed global response. Thus, interpreting temperature changes across TIII and MIS 7 requires considering regional, hemispheric, and global GMST stacks together.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>4.1.2</label><title>Comparison with the synthesis from Clark et al. (2024)</title>
      <p id="d2e2295">This synthesis of surface temperatures is the first to focus specifically on TIII and MIS 7. While previous global syntheses have examined temperature variations for MIS 7 across much longer timescales, the added value of this study is twofold: (i) it focuses on high-resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4000 years) data specifically for the MIS 7 period, whereas others rely on averaged resolutions over million-year timescales; and (ii) it aligns this period (260–190 ka) with a chronology not primarily based on orbital targeting (the AICC2023 ice core chronology). This is unlike previous syntheses, which are aligned on the LR04 benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O stack dated by fitting an ice volume model to 21 June insolation curve at 65° N, making it highly dependent on orbital forcing and with large absolute uncertainty (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 ka).</p>
      <p id="d2e2323">To date, the most comprehensive and up-to-date global synthesis is the one recently published by Clark et al. (2024). Their “high-resolution” synthesis compiled 47 sea surface temperature records of resolution better than 20 ka encompassing the 260–190 ka interval. However, the average resolution of these records is 3.9 ka, close to our resolution threshold (4 ka) and more than double the mean resolution of this study (1.7 ka).</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e2328">Comparison of our global- and regional-scale temperature reconstructions with those from Clark et al. (2024). All panels: Surface temperature from this study (blue) vs results from Clark et al. (2024) synthesis (black). Black and blue envelopes are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> interval of the corresponding stacks. GMST: Global Mean Surface Temperature. GSST: Global Sea Surface Temperature. NH: Northern Hemisphere. SH: Southern Hemisphere. NA: North Atlantic. SA: South Atlantic. NP: North Pacific. SP: South Pacific. Comparison is not performed for Indian Ocean and Equatorial Pacific stacks as corresponding stacks have not been produced in Clark et al. (2024).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1223/2026/cp-22-1223-2026-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e2345">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GSST and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST derived from the two syntheses exhibit comparable amplitudes, with discrepancies remaining below 1 °C throughout the entire TIII and MIS 7 interval (Fig. 6). The offset between the two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST is 0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 °C in average, with the Clark et al. (2024) synthesis slightly warmer. Nevertheless, pronounced hemispheric differences are revealed with the comparison. During MIS 7e, Southern Hemisphere temperatures are lower in the Clark et al. (2024) synthesis by 1.1 °C and during MIS 7c, Northern Hemisphere is cooler in the Clark et al. (2024) synthesis by 0.7 °C. In terms of timing, the Southern Hemisphere maximum temperature also occurs 3000 years later in the Clark et al. (2024) synthesis compared to this study. Finally, in the tropics, MIS 7e optimum is recorded 3500 years earlier in Clark et al. (2024), and the two syntheses display an average temperature offset of 1 °C over the whole MIS 7 (Fig. 6). At the basin scale, North Atlantic temperatures are colder, whereas North Pacific temperatures are warmer in the synthesis of Clark et al. (2024). The structure of Southern Pacific temperature also diverges between the two reconstructions, with substage MIS 7a absent from Clark et al. (2024) synthesis (Fig. 6).</p>
      <p id="d2e2376">These findings indicate that the apparent agreement at the global scale primarily reflects compensating regional biases rather than genuine similarity in spatial-scale patterns. This highlights the critical need for high-resolution, temporally constrained syntheses to characterize and discuss the spatio-temporal evolution of surface temperature over a specific interglacial.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Decoupling of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST vs. atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations over MIS 7e</title>
      <p id="d2e2405">Past atmospheric reconstructions evidence that maximum atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations were significantly higher during MIS 7e than during MIS 7c, with estimated differences of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 ppm and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CH<sub>4</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 ppb (Legrain et al., 2024; Loulergue et al., 2008) (Fig. 1i, j). In parallel, Antarctic surface temperatures, reconstructed from water isotopes in ice cores, identify MIS 7e as the warmest phase of the MIS 7 sequence in the high southern latitudes (Fig. 1k). This regional temperature pattern aligns with our Southern Hemisphere SST stacks from the South Atlantic and South Pacific, which both register temperature maxima during MIS 7e. However, these greenhouse gas variations and Antarctic surface temperature reconstructions contrast with the global surface temperature signal. In our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST reconstruction, MIS 7c appears comparable to, or slightly warmer with global mean surface temperatures 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 °C warmer than during MIS 7e. This result is consistent with the SST synthesis of Clark et al. (2024), which also identifies MIS 7c as slightly warmer than MIS 7e while relying on fewer and less resolved records (Fig. 6). Furthermore, sea-level reconstructions suggest higher stands during MIS 7c than during MIS 7e (Berends et al., 2021b; Spratt and Lisiecki, 2016) (Fig. 1h), reinforcing the interpretation that MIS 7c was not only warmer globally but also associated with a reduced global ice volume. However, this higher peak may also reflect the fact that MIS 7c followed a higher glacial sea-level baseline than MIS 7e (Fig. 1h).</p>
      <p id="d2e2502">From a radiative forcing perspective, the greenhouse gas difference between MIS 7e (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 275 ppm CO<sub>2</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 700 ppb CH<sub>4</sub>) and MIS 7c (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 245 ppm CO<sub>2</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 600 ppb CH<sub>4</sub>) corresponds to an estimated radiative forcing of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 W m<sup>−2</sup>, which would produce a global temperature change of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 °C (Hansen et al., 2011; Past Interglacials Working Group of PAGES, 2016). Given that MIS 7e was cooler than MIS 7c by 0.4 °C despite higher GHG concentrations, this implies an anomalous offset of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2 °C between the two periods, suggesting a decoupling between radiative forcing and global temperature response over at least one of them. However, it is important to note that the high CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations observed during MIS 7e are confined to its very beginning (approximately 2 kyr), forming a brief overshoot. After this overshoot, CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations no longer exceed those recorded during MIS 7c (Legrain et al., 2024).</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e2624">Relationship between GMST and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> across the interglacials of the past 450 ka. <bold>(a)</bold> Global mean surface temperature (GMST; black line with 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> grey envelope) and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations (red dashed line) for MIS 1 (Bereiter et al., 2015; Osman et al., 2021), MIS 5e (Bereiter et al., 2015; Clark et al., 2024), MIS 7c and MIS 7e (this study; Legrain et al., 2024), MIS 9e (Nehrbass-Ahles et al., 2020; Stevenard et al., 2025), and MIS 11 (Clark et al., 2024; Nehrbass-Ahles et al., 2020). The timescale used for atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> records is the AICC2023 chronology (Bouchet et al., 2023). Shaded vertical bands indicate the time windows used to compute the window-averaged values shown in panel <bold>(b)</bold>. For MIS 1, MIS 5e, MIS 7c and MIS 11, light blue bands correspond to the 3 kyr time windows following CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations peak. For MIS 9e and MIS 7e, blue/yellow bands denote alternative 3 kyr windows including/excluding the CO<sub>2</sub> overshoot. <bold>(b)</bold> Dots and square represent window-averaged values derived from the intervals shown in panel <bold>(a)</bold>, with horizontal and vertical error bars indicating the standard deviation of GMST and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations within each window. The dashed line shows the best-fit linear regression, with blue shading indicating the 95 % confidence interval of the predicted mean response. Light blue squares and dots represent interglacials values included in the regression. Yellow squares correspond to values calculated including the CO<sub>2</sub> overshoot for MIS 7e and MIS 9e and are excluded from the regression.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1223/2026/cp-22-1223-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2718">High-resolution records of CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and GMST estimates are now available over MIS 1 (Bauska et al., 2021; Osman et al., 2021), MIS 5 (Hoffman et al., 2017; Landais et al., 2013), MIS 7 (Legrain et al., 2024; this study), MIS 9 and MIS 11 (Clark et al., 2024; Nehrbass-Ahles et al., 2020; Stevenard et al., 2025). When comparing the average maximum CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations period (3 kyr window following the maximum CO<sub>2</sub> value) with GMST over the same period, it reveals that for MIS 7c, the atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations are within the range of expected values considering the GMST over this period and the CO<sub>2</sub> – GMST relationship of the past interglacials (Fig. 7). However, both MIS 7e and MIS 9 evidence anomalously high CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations of 31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 and 41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 ppm (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively, compared to the expected CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations value based on their GMST (Fig. 7b). These two interglacials are characterized by the most pronounced overshoots of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration of the past 500 ka, which consist in an abrupt increase followed by a similarly abrupt decrease of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations at the end of a Termination (Bereiter et al., 2015; Legrain et al., 2024; Nehrbass-Ahles et al., 2020). Over MIS 7e, atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations increase and drop by 30 ppm in 2000 years, while during MIS 9 concentrations fluctuate by 35 ppm in 4000 years. In contrast, when considering a 3 kyr window immediately following the CO<sub>2</sub> overshoot, once CO<sub>2</sub> levels have stabilized at typical interglacial equilibrium values, MIS 7e and MIS 9e fall in line with the other interglacials. These results suggest that during the overshoot phase, the global climate does not fully equilibrate with CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations, leading to a transient radiative decoupling. However, once the overshoot has subsided and CO<sub>2</sub> follows a more stable interglacial trajectory, this decoupling disappears.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Drivers of the MIS 7 surface temperature variations</title>
      <p id="d2e2878">Understanding the global morphology of the whole MIS 7 sequence requires investigating the forcing mechanisms behind these climatic variations. The pacing of glacial-interglacial periods is directly related to the amplitude and timing of orbital forcing, which acts as an external modulator of interglacial strength and duration (Tzedakis et al., 2017; Yin and Berger, 2012). Statistical analyses performed by Barker et al. (2025) further highlight the deterministic nature of glacial cycles with respect to orbital phasing, particularly the importance of low obliquity values for driving the end of an interglacial. Previous simulations aimed at disentangling the roles of orbital and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> forcing during interglacials have focused exclusively on MIS 7e (Yin and Berger, 2012), MIS 7d (Choudhury et al., 2020) or on interglacials outside the MIS 7 sequence (e.g. Herold et al., 2012; Yin and Berger, 2015). To our knowledge, no simulations from Earth system Models of Intermediate Complexity investigating the distinct role of orbital vs. CO<sub>2</sub> forcing spanning the whole MIS 7 sequence and TIII are published. However, a transient simulation spanning TIIIa and MIS 7a performed with a coupled climate–ice sheet model shows a dominant role of orbital forcing over greenhouse gases in the return to cold glacial conditions during MIS 7d and in the occurrence of TIIIa (Choudhury et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d2e2899">A qualitative assessment of orbital forcing across MIS 7 shows that obliquity underwent the most extreme variations of the entire Pleistocene, reaching both its absolute minimum (232 ka) and maximum (212 ka) values (Fig. 1). The extremely low values of obliquity (down to 22.1°) occurring over and after MIS 7e likely trigger the return to glacial conditions during MIS 7d, due to its impact on insolation at high latitudes. Consequently, the lowest 65° N summer insolation value of the past 2 Ma is also reached during this MIS 7e–MIS 7d transition (Fig. 1). While MIS 7e occurred during a declining phase of obliquity, consistent with most late Quaternary interglacials, its phasing relative to the obliquity cycle shows a deviation from the canonical pattern. In most cases, peak warmth (or minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O) occurs within a quarter obliquity cycle following the obliquity maximum (Laskar et al., 2004; Past Interglacials Working Group of PAGES, 2016). The MIS 7e appears somewhat later within the declining phase, closer to the subsequent obliquity minimum, but remains broadly aligned with the general pacing of interglacials. In contrast, MIS 7c is distinctly unusual: it is the only interglacial of the past 800 ka that coincides with, or occurs slightly before to, an obliquity maximum, which itself represents the highest obliquity value of the past 2 million years (Laskar et al., 2004; Past Interglacials Working Group of PAGES, 2016). These exceptional orbital conditions during MIS 7c suggest a direct influence of insolation on the triggering of MIS 7c, occurring several tens of thousands of years earlier than the expected “100 ka” pacing of climate cycles during this period.</p>
      <p id="d2e2913">Conceptual modelling approaches and radiometric dating of glacial terminations identified both precession and obliquity as crucial to constrain the timing of glacial terminations over the past 800 ka (e.g. Bajo et al., 2020; Huybers and Wunsch, 2005; Parrenin and Paillard, 2012). However, statistical analyses suggest that precession can trigger glacial terminations by itself in the 100 ka world (Barker et al., 2025). Interestingly, during earlier periods of the 41 ka world (1600–1200 ka), three-dimensional ice-sheet modelling substantiates the indissociable role of both obliquity and precession as necessary conditions for initiating and pacing deglaciations (Watanabe et al., 2023). These modelling studies emphasize the pervasive role of obliquity forcing in pacing glacial–interglacial variability. In the context of MIS 7, the exceptional phasing and amplitude of obliquity variations likely played a key role in structuring the sequence of climatic phases, including the early onset of MIS 7c.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Comparison of MIS 7 with the other interglacials of the Quaternary</title>
      <p id="d2e2924">The interval from 1.6 to 1.2 million years ago is recognized as the most clearly defined 41 ka climate cycle period of the Pleistocene. During this time, obliquity paced glacial-interglacial cycles, and their phasing with respect to precession, appear crucial in shaping the intensity and duration of interglacials (Watanabe et al., 2023). These dynamics are particularly relevant when interpreting the nature of TIIIa, which precedes MIS 7c. In our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GSST stack, TIIIa shows an amplitude of 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 °C, significantly lower than TIII (2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 °C), which led into MIS 7e (Fig. 8). This amplitude is comparable to that of terminations from the 1.6–1.2 Ma interval (average of 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 °C; Clark et al., 2024; Fig. 8c), further supporting the idea that TIIIa behaves more like an early Pleistocene obliquity-paced termination. Further evidence suggests that MIS 7c may not have involved full-depth ocean warming, despite its strong global surface warming. At a South Pacific site, high-resolution record of Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca-based bottom water temperatures suggests that MIS 11c, 7e, 5e, 1, and 9e were significantly warmer in the deep ocean than MIS 7c (Elderfield et al., 2012). This implies that MIS 7c warming would mostly be restricted to the ocean surface, consistent with a different dynamic origin, possibly amplified by reduced sea ice, lower albedo, and high obliquity-driven feedbacks. However, a global synthesis indicates that deep-ocean temperatures were warmer during MIS 7c, comparable to those observed during the Holocene (Clark et al., 2024).</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e2964">MIS 7 in the context of the post- and pre-MPT interglacials. Data are from Clark et al. (2024), excepted for MIS 7 (bold colors, this study) and MIS 9 (bold colors, Stevenard et al., 2025). <bold>(a)</bold> Timing of the onset of the preceding glacial termination between Southern and Northern Hemispheres stacks (pink) and between Southern Hemisphere and Tropics stacks (light blue), for the pre-MPT period (1.6–1.2 Ma). A positive value indicates an early onset of glacial termination in the Southern Hemisphere compared to the other stack. No value corresponds to a synchronous glacial termination onset. <bold>(b)</bold> Same as panel <bold>(a)</bold> but for post-MPT interglacials. <bold>(c)</bold> Temperature amplitude of the termination (green) based on GSST reconstruction. <bold>(d)</bold> Same as panel <bold>(c)</bold> but for post-MPT interglacials. Errors bars correspond to 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1223/2026/cp-22-1223-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2999">Regarding termination mechanisms, previous studies have evidenced a key role of Agulhas Leakage over these periods (e.g. Caley et al., 2011; Nuber et al., 2023; Stevenard et al., 2025). During glacial terminations, a southward shift of the Southern Hemisphere westerlies enhances the Agulhas Leakage, increasing the inflow of warm, salty Indian Ocean waters into the South Atlantic. This would strengthen the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), promotes interhemispheric heat exchange, and triggers early Southern Hemisphere warming that may accelerate global deglaciation (Caley et al., 2011; Nuber et al., 2023). The role of Agulhas leakage appears minor during TIIIa, as the only SST record from the Agulhas corridor shows no significant warming during this interval, contrary to during TIII (core MD96-2077, Fig. S3). As MIS 7d is shorter in duration than other glacial periods, it is likely that the Indian Ocean is not isolated long enough (Nuber et al., 2023) to produce the necessary warming to accelerate the glacial termination. This mechanism could explain why the early South Atlantic warming during TIIIa is imperceptible compared to TIII.</p>
      <p id="d2e3003">Watanabe et al. (2023) conducted sensitivity experiments with artificially reduced obliquity amplitude (to 60 % of modern values). Under this reduced obliquity scenario, their model produced 100 ka cycles over the early Pleistocene interval (1.6–1.2 Ma). In contrast, using the real full-amplitude obliquity produced the 41 ka pacing. These experiments demonstrate that the amplitude of obliquity alone can regulate the frequency of glacial cycles. Applying this framework to MIS 7, the exceptionally high obliquity peak synchronous with MIS 7c (Laskar et al., 2004; Past Interglacials Working Group of PAGES, 2016) may have temporarily shifted the climate system away from 100 ka eccentricity pacing and back into a 41 ka rhythm. This interpretation resonates with the self-sustained oscillation climate hypothesis (Mitsui et al., 2023). Simulations performed with an Earth system model of intermediate complexity evidences the existence of self-sustained climate oscillation at glacial-interglacial timescales, and develop the idea that the synchronization of such oscillation to orbital parameters may have driven major climate transition such as the MPT (Mitsui et al., 2023). Our results suggest that MIS 7c represents a temporary re-synchronization of the self-sustained climate oscillation with the obliquity forcing as it was the case during the 41 ka world period, temporarily overriding the prevailing 100 ka periodicity of the late Pleistocene.</p>
      <p id="d2e3006">Before MIS 7, two other interglacials of the Late Pleistocene, MIS 15 and in a lesser extent MIS 13, also exhibited a double warm peak structure (Past Interglacials Working Group of PAGES, 2016). These sequences are considered as the onset of 100 ka cycle occurring after the Mid-Pleistocene Transition, as it was preceded by the first extreme glaciation (MIS 16) of the Late Pleistocene. However, a comprehensive synthesis of surface temperature data for MIS 15 and MIS 13 remains unavailable. Unlike MIS 7, MIS 15 and MIS 13 did not occur under exceptional orbital forcing (Fig. 7) and took place in between the Mid-Pleistocene Transition and the Mid-Brunhes Shift (Past Interglacials Working Group of PAGES, 2016). Over this period, climate cycles were still shifting from a 41 ka to a 100 ka periodicity, resulting in interglacials including both periods signatures, restricting a direct comparison with MIS 7.</p>
      <p id="d2e3009">Although MIS 7 appears to have been paced by mechanisms reminiscent of the 41 ka glacial cycles, the warming pattern of TIIIa questions this comparison. TIII, which precedes MIS 7e, exhibits the classic characteristics of a glacial termination: deglaciation begins in the Southern Hemisphere at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 254 ka, progresses to the Tropics by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 251 ka, and finally reaches the Northern Hemisphere at 246 ka (Fig. 4d). This hemispheric progression is characteristic of the bipolar seesaw mechanism, whereby Southern Hemisphere warming leads Northern Hemisphere deglaciation through oceanic heat redistribution (Stocker and Johnsen, 2003), and of the role of the Agulhas leakage (Caley et al., 2011; Nuber et al., 2023; Stevenard et al., 2025). Such phasing pattern has already been observed for the youngest terminations (e.g. TI: Shakun et al., 2012; TIV: Stevenard et al., 2025).</p>
      <p id="d2e3026">In the Clark et al. (2024) synthesis, all terminations of the past 500 ka registered an early warming in the Southern Hemisphere compared to the Northern Hemisphere (Fig. 8b). In contrast, our results for TIIIa, which leads into MIS 7c, are marked by a near-synchronous SST rise across all latitudes, with no detectable interhemispheric phasing at the onset of warming (Fig. 8b). This globally uniform warming signal differs from the youngest terminations and suggests the involvement of other underlying dynamics, such as the role of the Agulhas Leakage (Stevenard et al., 2025; Fig. 8b). However, the analysis of recently published hemispheric SST stacks spanning the entire Pleistocene (Clark et al., 2024) reveals that a warming sequence characterized by an early Southern Hemisphere warming also appears to be a dominant feature of the 41 ka world. Some exceptions may occur during MIS 53 and MIS 41 (Fig. 8a), but chronological uncertainties for this interval remain large, and the analyses rely on only a small number of records (Clark et al., 2024).</p>
      <p id="d2e3029">The deviation of TIIIa from classical Pleistocene glacial terminations suggest that MIS 7 was not a return to pre-MPT dynamics, but rather a manifestation of 100 ka climate cyclicity operating under extreme obliquity conditions. As such, MIS 7 represents a hybrid interglacial, embedded within the post-MPT 100 ka framework, yet shaped by obliquity-driven forcing typical of the early Pleistocene.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e3042">This study presents the first comprehensive global-scale synthesis of SST focusing on TIII and MIS 7 including 132 high-resolution SST records aligned on a common chronological framework (i.e. the AICC2023 ice core chronology). Based on local, regional and global analyses of surface temperature variations, our results show that: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3047">Regional temperature stacks evidence a pronounced regional variability during MIS 7: across ocean basins, the structure can range from a well-defined pattern with three distinct temperature peaks corresponding to warm substages MIS 7e, 7c, and 7a (e.g., North Atlantic), to a more subdued signal characterized by low-amplitude of variations (e.g., Equatorial Pacific).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3051">Hemispheric temperature stacks revealed a heterogeneity in magnitude of the different warm and cold stages of MIS 7. While the Southern Hemisphere indicates an optimum during MIS 7e, the Northern Hemisphere and the Tropical areas reach their temperature maxima during MIS 7c.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3055">At the global scale, MIS 7c appears comparable to, or slightly warmer than MIS 7e. Global mean surface temperatures during both MIS 7e and MIS 7c remain below PI values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GMST <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 °C, respectively).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3102">The global mean surface temperature over MIS 7e and MIS 9e.evidences a transient decoupling with atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations during periods of CO<sub>2</sub> overshoots.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3124">Our results reveal that, while TIII displays the classical structure of a glacial termination characterized by a hemispheric phasing consistent with the bipolar seesaw hypothesis, TIIIa is marked by a near-synchronous SST rise across all latitudes, suggesting a distinct underlying mechanism.</p></list-item></list> Based on these key results and comparative analyses, our study highlights the unique character of MIS 7, situated within the 100 ka world yet exhibiting features uncharacteristic of late Pleistocene interglacials. We propose that MIS 7 represents a brief and temporary re-synchronization of internal climate oscillations with the 41 ka obliquity cycle, driven by the unusually extreme obliquity values reached during this interval. Rather than being a strict analogue of the early Pleistocene 41 ka world, MIS 7 should be viewed as a hybrid interglacial, resulting from the occurrence of specific orbital context within the post-MPT world.</p>
      <p id="d2e3128">Beyond the characterization of MIS 7, this synthesis represents a unique accessible dataset that compiles SST records with up-to-date methods that have been aligned on a common chronology. This effort provides a benchmark to evaluate Earth System Model simulations that have been performed over this period. Data-model comparison would help disentangling the role of greenhouse gases variations, oceanic dynamics and orbital forcing in shaping the unique morphology of surface temperature changes over MIS 7.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e3135">All references of data used in this synthesis are listed in Table S1. The revised age models, SST and tie-points are published in a Zenodo repository available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18836495" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.18836495</ext-link> (Stevenard, 2026). The code used for the stacking procedure is available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17209465" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.17209465</ext-link> (Stevenard, 2025).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e3144">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-22-1223-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-22-1223-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e3153">EL, EC and NS designed the research. NS collected the datasets building on a preliminary effort undertaken by EL. NS computed age models, SST calibrations and developed the method to infer the global and regional temperature stacks. NVR provides the yet unpublished <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>p</sub> dataset for the MD07-3077 core. EL performed the comparison and correlation analysis. EL led the writing of the manuscript with subsequent inputs from EC, NS, FP and NVR.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e3179">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e3185">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e3191">This study is an outcome of the Make Our Planet Great Again HOTCLIM project; it received the financial support from the French National Research Agency under the “Programme d'Investissements d'Avenir” (ANR-19-MPGA-0001). E.L. is also funded by the FROID project that received the financial and logistical support from the Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO) and International Polar Fundation (IPF), and by the postdoctoral CAPSULE project funded by the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO). N.V.R. acknowledges the support of the AXA Research Fund. We thank all authors who kindly shared their SST datasets with us, via personal communication or by the way of international FAIR database.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e3196">This research has been supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant no. ANR-19-MPGA-0001), the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (FROID), and the Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (CAPSULE).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e3202">This paper was edited by Francesco Muschitiello and reviewed by Lorraine Lisiecki and two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Bajo, P., Drysdale, R. N., Woodhead, J. D., Hellstrom, J. C., Hodell, D., Ferretti, P., Voelker, A. H. L., Zanchetta, G., Rodrigues, T., Wolff, E., Tyler, J., Frisia, S., Spötl, C., and Fallick, A. E.: Persistent influence of obliquity on ice age terminations since the Middle Pleistocene transition, Science, 367, 1235–1239, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw1114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aaw1114</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Barker, S., Knorr, G., Edwards, R. L., Parrenin, F., Putnam, A. E., Skinner, L. C., Wolff, E., and Ziegler, M.: 800 000 Years of Abrupt Climate Variability, Science, 334, 347–351, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203580" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1203580</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Barker, S., Chen, J., Gong, X., Jonkers, L., Knorr, G., and Thornalley, D.: Icebergs not the trigger for North Atlantic cold events, Nature, 520, 333–336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14330" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature14330</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Barker, S., Lisiecki, L. E., Knorr, G., Nuber, S., and Tzedakis, P. C.: Distinct roles for precession, obliquity, and eccentricity in Pleistocene 100-kyr glacial cycles, Science, 387, eadp3491, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adp3491" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.adp3491</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bauska, T. K., Marcott, S. A., and Brook, E. J.: Abrupt changes in the global carbon cycle during the last glacial period, Nat. Geosci., 14, 91–96, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-00680-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-020-00680-2</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bereiter, B., Eggleston, S., Schmitt, J., Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Stocker, T. F., Fischer, H., Kipfstuhl, S., and Chappellaz, J.: Revision of the EPICA Dome C CO <sub>2</sub> record from 800 to 600 kyr before present: Analytical bias in the EDC CO2 record, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 542–549, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061957" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL061957</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Berends, C. J., Köhler, P., Lourens, L. J., and Van De Wal, R. S. W.: On the Cause of the Mid-Pleistocene Transition, Rev. Geophys., 59, e2020RG000727, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000727" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020RG000727</ext-link>, 2021a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Berends, C. J., de Boer, B., and van de Wal, R. S. W.: Reconstructing the evolution of ice sheets, sea level, and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> during the past 3.6 million years, Clim. Past, 17, 361–377, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-361-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-17-361-2021</ext-link>, 2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bouchet, M., Landais, A., Grisart, A., Parrenin, F., Prié, F., Jacob, R., Fourré, E., Capron, E., Raynaud, D., Lipenkov, V. Y., Loutre, M.-F., Extier, T., Svensson, A., Legrain, E., Martinerie, P., Leuenberger, M., Jiang, W., Ritterbusch, F., Lu, Z.-T., and Yang, G.-M.: The Antarctic Ice Core Chronology 2023 (AICC2023) chronological framework and associated timescale for the European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica (EPICA) Dome C ice core, Clim. Past, 19, 2257–2286, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-2257-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-19-2257-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Breitkreuz, C., Paul, A., Kurahashi-Nakamura, T., Losch, M., and Schulz, M.: A Dynamical Reconstruction of the Global Monthly Mean Oxygen Isotopic Composition of Seawater, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 7206–7219, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014300" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JC014300</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Caley, T., Kim, J.-H., Malaizé, B., Giraudeau, J., Laepple, T., Caillon, N., Charlier, K., Rebaubier, H., Rossignol, L., Castañeda, I. S., Schouten, S., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: High-latitude obliquity as a dominant forcing in the Agulhas current system, Clim. Past, 7, 1285–1296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-1285-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-7-1285-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Capron, E., Govin, A., Stone, E. J., Masson-Delmotte, V., Mulitza, S., Otto-Bliesner, B., Rasmussen, T. L., Sime, L. C., Waelbroeck, C., and Wolff, E. W.: Temporal and spatial structure of multi-millennial temperature changes at high latitudes during the Last Interglacial, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 103, 116–133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.08.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.08.018</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Capron, E., Govin, A., Feng, R., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., and Wolff, E. W.: Critical evaluation of climate syntheses to benchmark CMIP6/PMIP4 127 ka Last Interglacial simulations in the high-latitude regions, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 168, 137–150, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.04.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.04.019</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., Sinha, A., Spötl, C., Yi, L., Chen, S., Kelly, M., Kathayat, G., Wang, X., Li, X., Kong, X., Wang, Y., Ning, Y., and Zhang, H.: The Asian monsoon over the past 640,000 years and ice age terminations, Nature, 534, 640–646, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18591" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature18591</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Choudhury, D., Timmermann, A., Schloesser, F., Heinemann, M., and Pollard, D.: Simulating Marine Isotope Stage 7 with a coupled climate–ice sheet model, Clim. Past, 16, 2183–2201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2183-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-16-2183-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Clark, P. U., Shakun, J. D., Rosenthal, Y., Köhler, P., and Bartlein, P. J.: Global and regional temperature change over the past 4.5 million years, Science, 383, 884–890, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi1908" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.adi1908</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Clemens, S. C., Holbourn, A., Kubota, Y., Lee, K. E., Liu, Z., Chen, G., Nelson, A., and Fox-Kemper, B.: Precession-band variance missing from East Asian monsoon runoff, Nat. Commun., 9, 3364, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05814-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-05814-0</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Colleoni, F., Masina, S., Cherchi, A., and Iovino, D.: Impact of Orbital Parameters and Greenhouse Gas on the Climate of MIS 7 and MIS 5 Glacial Inceptions, J. Climate, 27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00754.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00754.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Desprat, S., Sánchez Goñi, M. F., Turon, J.-L., Duprat, J., Malaizé, B., and Peypouquet, J.-P.: Climatic variability of Marine Isotope Stage 7: direct land–sea–ice correlation from a multiproxy analysis of a north-western Iberian margin deep-sea core, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 25, 1010–1026, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.01.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.01.001</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Dutton, A., Bard, E., Antonioli, F., Esat, T. M., Lambeck, K., and McCulloch, M. T.: Phasing and amplitude of sea-level and climate change during the penultimate interglacial, Nat. Geosci., 2, 355–359, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo470" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo470</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Elderfield, H., Ferretti, P., Greaves, M., Crowhurst, S., McCave, I. N., Hodell, D., and Piotrowski, A. M.: Evolution of Ocean Temperature and Ice Volume Through the Mid-Pleistocene Climate Transition, Science, 337, 704–709, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1221294" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1221294</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Ganopolski, A. and Brovkin, V.: Simulation of climate, ice sheets and CO<sub>2</sub> evolution during the last four glacial cycles with an Earth system model of intermediate complexity, Clim. Past, 13, 1695–1716, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1695-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-13-1695-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Gao, Q., Capron, E., Sime, L. C., Rhodes, R. H., Sivankutty, R., Zhang, X., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., and Werner, M.: Assessment of the southern polar and subpolar warming in the PMIP4 last interglacial simulations using paleoclimate data syntheses, Clim. Past, 21, 419–440, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-419-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-21-419-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Gray, W. R. and Evans, D.: Nonthermal Influences on Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca in Planktonic Foraminifera: A Review of Culture Studies and Application to the Last Glacial Maximum, Paleoceanog. Paleoclimatol., 34, 306–315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018PA003517" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018PA003517</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., and von Schuckmann, K.: Earth's energy imbalance and implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 13421–13449, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13421-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-13421-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Herold, N., Yin, Q. Z., Karami, M. P., and Berger, A.: Modelling the climatic diversity of the warm interglacials, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 56, 126–141, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.08.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.08.020</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Hodell, D. A., Crowhurst, S. J., Lourens, L., Margari, V., Nicolson, J., Rolfe, J. E., Skinner, L. C., Thomas, N. C., Tzedakis, P. C., Mleneck-Vautravers, M. J., and Wolff, E. W.: A 1.5-million-year record of orbital and millennial climate variability in the North Atlantic, Clim. Past, 19, 607–636, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-607-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-19-607-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Hoffman, J. S., Clark, P. U., Parnell, A. C., and He, F.: Regional and global sea-surface temperatures during the last interglaciation, Science, 355, 276–279, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai8464" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aai8464</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Huybers, P. and Wunsch, C.: Obliquity pacing of the late Pleistocene glacial terminations, Nature, 434, 491–494, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03401" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature03401</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Imbrie, J. Z., Imbrie-Moore, A., and Lisiecki, L. E.: A phase-space model for Pleistocene ice volume, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 307, 94–102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.018</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Jouzel, J., Masson-Delmotte, V., Cattani, O., Dreyfus, G., Falourd, S., Hoffmann, G., Minster, B., Nouet, J., Barnola, J. M., Chappellaz, J., Fischer, H., Gallet, J. C., Johnsen, S., Leuenberger, M., Loulergue, L., Luethi, D., Oerter, H., Parrenin, F., Raisbeck, G., Raynaud, D., Schilt, A., Schwander, J., Selmo, E., Souchez, R., Spahni, R., Stauffer, B., Steffensen, J. P., Stenni, B., Stocker, T. F., Tison, J. L., Werner, M., and Wolff, E. W.: Orbital and Millennial Antarctic Climate Variability over the Past 800,000 Years, Science, 317, 793–796, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1141038</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Kleinen, T., Gromov, S., Steil, B., and Brovkin, V.: Atmospheric methane since the last glacial maximum was driven by wetland sources, Clim. Past, 19, 1081–1099, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1081-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-19-1081-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Landais, A., Dreyfus, G., Capron, E., Jouzel, J., Masson-Delmotte, V., Roche, D. M., Prié, F., Caillon, N., Chappellaz, J., Leuenberger, M., Lourantou, A., Parrenin, F., Raynaud, D., and Teste, G.: Two-phase change in CO2, Antarctic temperature and global climate during Termination II, Nat. Geosci., 6, 1062–1065, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1985" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1985</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Landais, A., Stenni, B., Masson-Delmotte, V., Jouzel, J., Cauquoin, A., Fourré, E., Minster, B., Selmo, E., Extier, T., Werner, M., Vimeux, F., Uemura, R., Crotti, I., and Grisart, A.: Interglacial Antarctic–Southern Ocean climate decoupling due to moisture source area shifts, Nat. Geosci., 14, 918–923, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00856-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-021-00856-4</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Lang, N. and Wolff, E. W.: Interglacial and glacial variability from the last 800 ka in marine, ice and terrestrial archives, Clim. Past, 7, 361–380, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-361-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-7-361-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Laskar, J., Robutel, P., Joutel, F., Gastineau, M., Correia, A. C. M., and Levrard, B.: A long-term numerical solution for the insolation quantities of the Earth, A&amp;A, 428, 261–285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041335" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/0004-6361:20041335</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Lea, D. W., Martin, P. A., Pak, D. K., and Spero, H. J.: Reconstructing a 350ky history of sea level using planktonic Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca and oxygen isotope records from a Cocos Ridge core, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 21, 283–293, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(01)00081-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0277-3791(01)00081-6</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Legrain, E., Parrenin, F., and Capron, E.: A gradual change is more likely to have caused the Mid-Pleistocene Transition than an abrupt event, Commun. Earth Environ., 4, 90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00754-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-023-00754-0</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Legrain, E., Capron, E., Menviel, L., Wohleber, A., Parrenin, F., Teste, G., Landais, A., Bouchet, M., Grilli, R., Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Silva, L., Fischer, H., and Stocker, T. F.: Centennial-scale variations in the carbon cycle enhanced by high obliquity, Nat. Geosci., 17, 1154–1161, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01556-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-024-01556-5</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Lisiecki, L. E. and Raymo, M. E.: A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O records, Paleoceanography, 20, 2004PA001071, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004PA001071</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Lougheed, B. C. and Obrochta, S. P.: A Rapid, Deterministic Age-Depth Modeling Routine for Geological Sequences With Inherent Depth Uncertainty, Paleoceanog. Paleoclimatol., 34, 122–133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018PA003457" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018PA003457</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Loulergue, L., Schilt, A., Spahni, R., Masson-Delmotte, V., Blunier, T., Lemieux, B., Barnola, J.-M., Raynaud, D., Stocker, T. F., and Chappellaz, J.: Orbital and millennial-scale features of atmospheric CH4 over the past 800,000 years, Nature, 453, 383–386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06950" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature06950</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Malevich, S. B., Vetter, L., and Tierney, J. E.: Global Core Top Calibration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O in Planktic Foraminifera to Sea Surface Temperature, Paleoceanog. Paleoclimatol., 34, 1292–1315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003576" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019PA003576</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Martrat, B., Grimalt, J. O., Shackleton, N. J., De Abreu, L., Hutterli, M. A., and Stocker, T. F.: Four Climate Cycles of Recurring Deep and Surface Water Destabilizations on the Iberian Margin, Science, 317, 502–507, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139994" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1139994</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Milker, Y., Rachmayani, R., Weinkauf, M. F. G., Prange, M., Raitzsch, M., Schulz, M., and Kučera, M.: Global and regional sea surface temperature trends during Marine Isotope Stage 11, Clim. Past, 9, 2231–2252, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2231-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-9-2231-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Mitsui, T., Willeit, M., and Boers, N.: Synchronization phenomena observed in glacial–interglacial cycles simulated in an Earth system model of intermediate complexity, Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 1277–1294, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1277-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esd-14-1277-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Shin, J., Schmitt, J., Bereiter, B., Joos, F., Schilt, A., Schmidely, L., Silva, L., Teste, G., Grilli, R., Chappellaz, J., Hodell, D., Fischer, H., and Stocker, T. F.: Abrupt CO<sub>2</sub> release to the atmosphere under glacial and early interglacial climate conditions, Science, 369, 1000–1005, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay8178" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aay8178</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Nuber, S., Rae, J. W. B., Zhang, X., Andersen, M. B., Dumont, M. D., Mithan, H. T., Sun, Y., De Boer, B., Hall, I. R., and Barker, S.: Indian Ocean salinity build-up primes deglacial ocean circulation recovery, Nature, 617, 306–311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05866-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-023-05866-3</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Osman, M. B., Tierney, J. E., Zhu, J., Tardif, R., Hakim, G. J., King, J., and Poulsen, C. J.: Globally resolved surface temperatures since the Last Glacial Maximum, Nature, 599, 239–244, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03984-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-021-03984-4</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Paillard, D., Labeyrie, L., and Yiou, P.: Macintosh Program performs time-series analysis, EoS Transactions, 77, 379–379, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96EO00259" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96EO00259</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Parrenin, F. and Paillard, D.: Terminations VI and VIII (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 530 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 720 kyr BP) tell us the importance of obliquity and precession in the triggering of deglaciations, Clim. Past, 8, 2031–2037, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-2031-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-8-2031-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Past Interglacials Working Group of PAGES: Interglacials of the last 800,000 years, Rev. Geophys., 54, 162–219, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000482" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015RG000482</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Petit, J. R., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Barkov, N. I., Delaygue, G., Delmotte, M., Kotlyakov, V. M., Legrand, M., Lipenkov, V. Y., Lorius, C., and Saltzman, E.: Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica, 399, 429–436, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/20859" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/20859</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Prokopenko, A. A., Hinnov, L. A., Williams, D. F., and Kuzmin, M. I.: Orbital forcing of continental climate during the Pleistocene: a complete astronomically tuned climatic record from Lake Baikal, SE Siberia, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 25, 3431–3457, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.10.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.10.002</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Rayner, N. A., Parker, D. E., Horton, E. B., Folland, C. K., Alexander, L. V., Rowell, D. P., Kent, E. C., and Kaplan, A.: Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 2002JD002670, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002670</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Roucoux, K. H., Tzedakis, P. C., Frogley, M. R., Lawson, I. T., and Preece, R. C.: Vegetation history of the marine isotope stage 7 interglacial complex at Ioannina, NW Greece, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 27, 1378–1395, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.04.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.04.002</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Shakun, J. D., Clark, P. U., He, F., Marcott, S. A., Mix, A. C., Liu, Z., Otto-Bliesner, B., Schmittner, A., and Bard, E.: Global warming preceded by increasing carbon dioxide concentrations during the last deglaciation, Nature, 484, 49–54, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10915" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature10915</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Shakun, J. D., Clark, P. U., He, F., Lifton, N. A., Liu, Z., and Otto-Bliesner, B. L.: Regional and global forcing of glacier retreat during the last deglaciation, Nat. Commun., 6, 8059, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms9059</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Siddall, M., Rohling, E. J., Almogi-Labin, A., Hemleben, Ch., Meischner, D., Schmelzer, I., and Smeed, D. A.: Sea-level fluctuations during the last glacial cycle, Nature, 423, 853–858, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01690" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature01690</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Snyder, C. W.: Evolution of global temperature over the past two million years, Nature, 538, 226–228, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19798" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature19798</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Spratt, R. M. and Lisiecki, L. E.: A Late Pleistocene sea level stack, Clim. Past, 12, 1079–1092, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-1079-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-12-1079-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Stevenard, N.: NathStevenard/sststack: Release v1.0.0 (v1.0.0), Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17209465" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.17209465</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Stevenard, N.: A harmonized SST compilation across MIS 8, Terminations III and IIIa, and MIS 7 (260–190 ka BP), Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18836495" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.18836495</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Stevenard, N., Capron, É., Legrain, É., and Coutelle, C.: Global and regional sea-surface temperature changes over the Marine Isotopic Stage 9e and Termination IV, Clim. Past, 21, 1895–1916, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-1895-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-21-1895-2025</ext-link>, 2025. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Stocker, T. F. and Johnsen, S. J.: A minimum thermodynamic model for the bipolar seesaw, Paleoceanography, 18, 2003PA000920, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003PA000920" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003PA000920</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Tierney, J. E. and Tingley, M. P.: BAYSPLINE: A New Calibration for the Alkenone Paleothermometer, Paleoceanog. Paleoclimatol., 33, 281–301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017PA003201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017PA003201</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Tierney, J. E., Malevich, S. B., Gray, W., Vetter, L., and Thirumalai, K.: Bayesian Calibration of the Mg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca Paleothermometer in Planktic Foraminifera, Paleoceanog. Paleoclimatol., 34, 2005–2030, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003744" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019PA003744</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation> Tierney, J. E., Zhu, J., King, J., Malevich, S. B., Hakim, G. J., and Poulsen, C. J.: Glacial cooling and climate sensitivity revisited, Nature, 584, 569–573, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Tzedakis, P. C., Raynaud, D., McManus, J. F., Berger, A., Brovkin, V., and Kiefer, T.: Interglacial diversity, Nat. Geosci., 2, 751–755, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo660" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo660</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Tzedakis, P. C., Wolff, E. W., Skinner, L. C., Brovkin, V., Hodell, D. A., McManus, J. F., and Raynaud, D.: Can we predict the duration of an interglacial?, Clim. Past, 8, 1473–1485, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-1473-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-8-1473-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Tzedakis, P. C., Crucifix, M., Mitsui, T., and Wolff, E. W.: A simple rule to determine which insolation cycles lead to interglacials, Nature, 542, 427–432, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21364" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature21364</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Vázquez Riveiros, N., Waelbroeck, C., Skinner, L., Roche, D. M., Duplessy, J.-C., and Michel, E.: Response of South Atlantic deep waters to deglacial warming during Terminations V and I, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 298, 323–333, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.08.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2010.08.003</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Watanabe, Y., Abe-Ouchi, A., Saito, F., Kino, K., O'ishi, R., Ito, T., Kawamura, K., and Chan, W.-L.: Astronomical forcing shaped the timing of early Pleistocene glacial cycles, Commun. Earth Environ., 4, 113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00765-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-023-00765-x</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Wendt, K. A., Li, X., Edwards, R. L., Cheng, H., and Spötl, C.: Precise timing of MIS 7 substages from the Austrian Alps, Clim. Past, 17, 1443–1454, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1443-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-17-1443-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Yin, Q. and Berger, A.: Interglacial analogues of the Holocene and its natural near future, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 120, 28–46, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.04.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.04.008</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Yin, Q. Z. and Berger, A.: Individual contribution of insolation and CO2 to the interglacial climates of the past 800,000 years, Clim. Dynam., 38, 709–724, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1013-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-011-1013-5</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The Marine Isotopic Stage 7: a relic of the “41&thinsp;ka world”? Perspectives from a global-scale sea-surface temperature synthesis</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bajo, P., Drysdale, R. N., Woodhead, J. D., Hellstrom, J. C., Hodell, D.,
Ferretti, P., Voelker, A. H. L., Zanchetta, G., Rodrigues, T., Wolff, E.,
Tyler, J., Frisia, S., Spötl, C., and Fallick, A. E.: Persistent
influence of obliquity on ice age terminations since the Middle Pleistocene
transition, Science, 367, 1235–1239, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw1114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw1114</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barker, S., Knorr, G., Edwards, R. L., Parrenin, F., Putnam, A. E., Skinner,
L. C., Wolff, E., and Ziegler, M.: 800&thinsp;000 Years of Abrupt Climate
Variability, Science, 334, 347–351, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203580" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203580</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barker, S., Chen, J., Gong, X., Jonkers, L., Knorr, G., and Thornalley, D.:
Icebergs not the trigger for North Atlantic cold events, Nature, 520,
333–336, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14330" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14330</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barker, S., Lisiecki, L. E., Knorr, G., Nuber, S., and Tzedakis, P. C.:
Distinct roles for precession, obliquity, and eccentricity in Pleistocene
100-kyr glacial cycles, Science, 387, eadp3491,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adp3491" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adp3491</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bauska, T. K., Marcott, S. A., and Brook, E. J.: Abrupt changes in the
global carbon cycle during the last glacial period, Nat. Geosci., 14,
91–96, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-00680-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-00680-2</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bereiter, B., Eggleston, S., Schmitt, J., Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Stocker, T.
F., Fischer, H., Kipfstuhl, S., and Chappellaz, J.: Revision of the EPICA
Dome C CO <sub>2</sub> record from 800 to 600&thinsp;kyr before present: Analytical bias
in the EDC CO2 record, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 542–549,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061957" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061957</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berends, C. J., Köhler, P., Lourens, L. J., and Van De Wal, R. S. W.: On
the Cause of the Mid-Pleistocene Transition, Rev. Geophys., 59,
e2020RG000727, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000727" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000727</a>, 2021a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berends, C. J., de Boer, B., and van de Wal, R. S. W.: Reconstructing the evolution of ice sheets, sea level, and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> during the past 3.6 million years, Clim. Past, 17, 361–377, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-361-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-361-2021</a>, 2021b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bouchet, M., Landais, A., Grisart, A., Parrenin, F., Prié, F., Jacob, R., Fourré, E., Capron, E., Raynaud, D., Lipenkov, V. Y., Loutre, M.-F., Extier, T., Svensson, A., Legrain, E., Martinerie, P., Leuenberger, M., Jiang, W., Ritterbusch, F., Lu, Z.-T., and Yang, G.-M.: The Antarctic Ice Core Chronology 2023 (AICC2023) chronological framework and associated timescale for the European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica (EPICA) Dome C ice core, Clim. Past, 19, 2257–2286, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-2257-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-2257-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Breitkreuz, C., Paul, A., Kurahashi-Nakamura, T., Losch, M., and Schulz, M.:
A Dynamical Reconstruction of the Global Monthly Mean Oxygen Isotopic
Composition of Seawater, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 7206–7219,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014300" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014300</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Caley, T., Kim, J.-H., Malaizé, B., Giraudeau, J., Laepple, T., Caillon, N., Charlier, K., Rebaubier, H., Rossignol, L., Castañeda, I. S., Schouten, S., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: High-latitude obliquity as a dominant forcing in the Agulhas current system, Clim. Past, 7, 1285–1296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-1285-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-1285-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Capron, E., Govin, A., Stone, E. J., Masson-Delmotte, V., Mulitza, S.,
Otto-Bliesner, B., Rasmussen, T. L., Sime, L. C., Waelbroeck, C., and Wolff,
E. W.: Temporal and spatial structure of multi-millennial temperature
changes at high latitudes during the Last Interglacial, Quaternary Sci.
Rev., 103, 116–133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.08.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.08.018</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Capron, E., Govin, A., Feng, R., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., and Wolff, E. W.:
Critical evaluation of climate syntheses to benchmark CMIP6/PMIP4 127&thinsp;ka
Last Interglacial simulations in the high-latitude regions, Quaternary
Sci. Rev., 168, 137–150, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.04.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.04.019</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., Sinha, A., Spötl, C., Yi, L., Chen, S., Kelly, M., Kathayat, G., Wang, X., Li, X., Kong, X., Wang, Y., Ning, Y., and Zhang, H.: The Asian monsoon over the past 640,000 years and ice age terminations, Nature, 534, 640–646, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18591" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18591</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Choudhury, D., Timmermann, A., Schloesser, F., Heinemann, M., and Pollard, D.: Simulating Marine Isotope Stage 7 with a coupled climate–ice sheet model, Clim. Past, 16, 2183–2201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2183-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2183-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clark, P. U., Shakun, J. D., Rosenthal, Y., Köhler, P., and Bartlein, P.
J.: Global and regional temperature change over the past 4.5 million years,
Science, 383, 884–890, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi1908" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi1908</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clemens, S. C., Holbourn, A., Kubota, Y., Lee, K. E., Liu, Z., Chen, G., Nelson, A., and Fox-Kemper, B.: Precession-band variance missing from East Asian monsoon runoff, Nat. Commun., 9, 3364, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05814-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05814-0</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Colleoni, F., Masina, S., Cherchi, A., and Iovino, D.: Impact of Orbital
Parameters and Greenhouse Gas on the Climate of MIS 7 and MIS 5 Glacial
Inceptions, J. Climate, 27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00754.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00754.1</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Desprat, S., Sánchez Goñi, M. F., Turon, J.-L., Duprat, J.,
Malaizé, B., and Peypouquet, J.-P.: Climatic variability of Marine
Isotope Stage 7: direct land–sea–ice correlation from a multiproxy
analysis of a north-western Iberian margin deep-sea core, Quaternary Sci.
Rev., 25, 1010–1026, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.01.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.01.001</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dutton, A., Bard, E., Antonioli, F., Esat, T. M., Lambeck, K., and
McCulloch, M. T.: Phasing and amplitude of sea-level and climate change
during the penultimate interglacial, Nat. Geosci., 2, 355–359,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo470" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo470</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Elderfield, H., Ferretti, P., Greaves, M., Crowhurst, S., McCave, I. N.,
Hodell, D., and Piotrowski, A. M.: Evolution of Ocean Temperature and Ice
Volume Through the Mid-Pleistocene Climate Transition, Science, 337,
704–709, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1221294" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1221294</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ganopolski, A. and Brovkin, V.: Simulation of climate, ice sheets and CO<sub>2</sub> evolution during the last four glacial cycles with an Earth system model of intermediate complexity, Clim. Past, 13, 1695–1716, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1695-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1695-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gao, Q., Capron, E., Sime, L. C., Rhodes, R. H., Sivankutty, R., Zhang, X., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., and Werner, M.: Assessment of the southern polar and subpolar warming in the PMIP4 last interglacial simulations using paleoclimate data syntheses, Clim. Past, 21, 419–440, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-419-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-419-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gray, W. R. and Evans, D.: Nonthermal Influences on Mg&thinsp;∕&thinsp;Ca in Planktonic
Foraminifera: A Review of Culture Studies and Application to the Last
Glacial Maximum, Paleoceanog. Paleoclimatol., 34, 306–315,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018PA003517" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018PA003517</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., and von Schuckmann, K.: Earth's energy imbalance and implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 13421–13449, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13421-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13421-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Herold, N., Yin, Q. Z., Karami, M. P., and Berger, A.: Modelling the
climatic diversity of the warm interglacials, Quaternary Sci. Rev.,
56, 126–141, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.08.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.08.020</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hodell, D. A., Crowhurst, S. J., Lourens, L., Margari, V., Nicolson, J., Rolfe, J. E., Skinner, L. C., Thomas, N. C., Tzedakis, P. C., Mleneck-Vautravers, M. J., and Wolff, E. W.: A 1.5-million-year record of orbital and millennial climate variability in the North Atlantic, Clim. Past, 19, 607–636, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-607-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-607-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoffman, J. S., Clark, P. U., Parnell, A. C., and He, F.: Regional and
global sea-surface temperatures during the last interglaciation, Science,
355, 276–279, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai8464" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai8464</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huybers, P. and Wunsch, C.: Obliquity pacing of the late Pleistocene glacial
terminations, Nature, 434, 491–494, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03401" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03401</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Imbrie, J. Z., Imbrie-Moore, A., and Lisiecki, L. E.: A phase-space model
for Pleistocene ice volume, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 307, 94–102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.018</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jouzel, J., Masson-Delmotte, V., Cattani, O., Dreyfus, G., Falourd, S.,
Hoffmann, G., Minster, B., Nouet, J., Barnola, J. M., Chappellaz, J.,
Fischer, H., Gallet, J. C., Johnsen, S., Leuenberger, M., Loulergue, L.,
Luethi, D., Oerter, H., Parrenin, F., Raisbeck, G., Raynaud, D., Schilt, A.,
Schwander, J., Selmo, E., Souchez, R., Spahni, R., Stauffer, B., Steffensen,
J. P., Stenni, B., Stocker, T. F., Tison, J. L., Werner, M., and Wolff, E.
W.: Orbital and Millennial Antarctic Climate Variability over the Past
800,000 Years, Science, 317, 793–796, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141038</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kleinen, T., Gromov, S., Steil, B., and Brovkin, V.: Atmospheric methane since the last glacial maximum was driven by wetland sources, Clim. Past, 19, 1081–1099, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1081-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1081-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Landais, A., Dreyfus, G., Capron, E., Jouzel, J., Masson-Delmotte, V.,
Roche, D. M., Prié, F., Caillon, N., Chappellaz, J., Leuenberger, M.,
Lourantou, A., Parrenin, F., Raynaud, D., and Teste, G.: Two-phase change in
CO2, Antarctic temperature and global climate during Termination II, Nat.
Geosci., 6, 1062–1065, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1985" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1985</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Landais, A., Stenni, B., Masson-Delmotte, V., Jouzel, J., Cauquoin, A.,
Fourré, E., Minster, B., Selmo, E., Extier, T., Werner, M., Vimeux, F.,
Uemura, R., Crotti, I., and Grisart, A.: Interglacial Antarctic–Southern
Ocean climate decoupling due to moisture source area shifts, Nat. Geosci.,
14, 918–923, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00856-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00856-4</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lang, N. and Wolff, E. W.: Interglacial and glacial variability from the last 800&thinsp;ka in marine, ice and terrestrial archives, Clim. Past, 7, 361–380, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-361-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-361-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laskar, J., Robutel, P., Joutel, F., Gastineau, M., Correia, A. C. M., and
Levrard, B.: A long-term numerical solution for the insolation quantities of
the Earth, A&amp;A, 428, 261–285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041335" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041335</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lea, D. W., Martin, P. A., Pak, D. K., and Spero, H. J.: Reconstructing a
350ky history of sea level using planktonic Mg&thinsp;∕&thinsp;Ca and oxygen isotope records from a Cocos Ridge core, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 21, 283–293,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(01)00081-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(01)00081-6</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Legrain, E., Parrenin, F., and Capron, E.: A gradual change is more likely
to have caused the Mid-Pleistocene Transition than an abrupt event, Commun.
Earth Environ., 4, 90, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00754-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00754-0</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Legrain, E., Capron, E., Menviel, L., Wohleber, A., Parrenin, F., Teste, G.,
Landais, A., Bouchet, M., Grilli, R., Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Silva, L.,
Fischer, H., and Stocker, T. F.: Centennial-scale variations in the carbon
cycle enhanced by high obliquity, Nat. Geosci., 17, 1154–1161,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01556-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01556-5</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lisiecki, L. E. and Raymo, M. E.: A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57
globally distributed benthic <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O records, Paleoceanography,
20, 2004PA001071, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001071</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lougheed, B. C. and Obrochta, S. P.: A Rapid, Deterministic Age-Depth
Modeling Routine for Geological Sequences With Inherent Depth Uncertainty,
Paleoceanog. Paleoclimatol., 34, 122–133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018PA003457" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018PA003457</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Loulergue, L., Schilt, A., Spahni, R., Masson-Delmotte, V., Blunier, T.,
Lemieux, B., Barnola, J.-M., Raynaud, D., Stocker, T. F., and Chappellaz,
J.: Orbital and millennial-scale features of atmospheric CH4 over the past
800,000 years, Nature, 453, 383–386, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06950" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06950</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Malevich, S. B., Vetter, L., and Tierney, J. E.: Global Core Top Calibration
of <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O in Planktic Foraminifera to Sea Surface Temperature,
Paleoceanog. Paleoclimatol., 34, 1292–1315,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003576" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003576</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Martrat, B., Grimalt, J. O., Shackleton, N. J., De Abreu, L., Hutterli, M.
A., and Stocker, T. F.: Four Climate Cycles of Recurring Deep and Surface
Water Destabilizations on the Iberian Margin, Science, 317, 502–507,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139994" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139994</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Milker, Y., Rachmayani, R., Weinkauf, M. F. G., Prange, M., Raitzsch, M., Schulz, M., and Kučera, M.: Global and regional sea surface temperature trends during Marine Isotope Stage 11, Clim. Past, 9, 2231–2252, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2231-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2231-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mitsui, T., Willeit, M., and Boers, N.: Synchronization phenomena observed in glacial–interglacial cycles simulated in an Earth system model of intermediate complexity, Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 1277–1294, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1277-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1277-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Shin, J., Schmitt, J., Bereiter, B., Joos, F., Schilt,
A., Schmidely, L., Silva, L., Teste, G., Grilli, R., Chappellaz, J., Hodell,
D., Fischer, H., and Stocker, T. F.: Abrupt CO<sub>2</sub> release to the
atmosphere under glacial and early interglacial climate conditions, Science,
369, 1000–1005, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay8178" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay8178</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nuber, S., Rae, J. W. B., Zhang, X., Andersen, M. B., Dumont, M. D., Mithan,
H. T., Sun, Y., De Boer, B., Hall, I. R., and Barker, S.: Indian Ocean
salinity build-up primes deglacial ocean circulation recovery, Nature, 617,
306–311, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05866-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05866-3</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Osman, M. B., Tierney, J. E., Zhu, J., Tardif, R., Hakim, G. J., King, J.,
and Poulsen, C. J.: Globally resolved surface temperatures since the Last
Glacial Maximum, Nature, 599, 239–244, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03984-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03984-4</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paillard, D., Labeyrie, L., and Yiou, P.: Macintosh Program performs
time-series analysis, EoS Transactions, 77, 379–379,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96EO00259" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96EO00259</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Parrenin, F. and Paillard, D.: Terminations VI and VIII ( ∼ &thinsp;530 and  ∼ &thinsp;720&thinsp;kyr&thinsp;BP) tell us the importance of obliquity and precession in the triggering of deglaciations, Clim. Past, 8, 2031–2037, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-2031-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-2031-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Past Interglacials Working Group of PAGES: Interglacials of the last 800,000
years, Rev. Geophys., 54, 162–219, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000482" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000482</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petit, J. R., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Barkov, N. I., Delaygue, G.,
Delmotte, M., Kotlyakov, V. M., Legrand, M., Lipenkov, V. Y., Lorius, C.,
and Saltzman, E.: Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years
from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica, 399, 429–436, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/20859" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/20859</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prokopenko, A. A., Hinnov, L. A., Williams, D. F., and Kuzmin, M. I.:
Orbital forcing of continental climate during the Pleistocene: a complete
astronomically tuned climatic record from Lake Baikal, SE Siberia,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 25, 3431–3457, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.10.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.10.002</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rayner, N. A., Parker, D. E., Horton, E. B., Folland, C. K., Alexander, L.
V., Rowell, D. P., Kent, E. C., and Kaplan, A.: Global analyses of sea
surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the
late nineteenth century, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 2002JD002670,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Roucoux, K. H., Tzedakis, P. C., Frogley, M. R., Lawson, I. T., and Preece,
R. C.: Vegetation history of the marine isotope stage 7 interglacial complex
at Ioannina, NW Greece, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 27, 1378–1395,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.04.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.04.002</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shakun, J. D., Clark, P. U., He, F., Marcott, S. A., Mix, A. C., Liu, Z.,
Otto-Bliesner, B., Schmittner, A., and Bard, E.: Global warming preceded by
increasing carbon dioxide concentrations during the last deglaciation,
Nature, 484, 49–54, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10915" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10915</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shakun, J. D., Clark, P. U., He, F., Lifton, N. A., Liu, Z., and
Otto-Bliesner, B. L.: Regional and global forcing of glacier retreat during
the last deglaciation, Nat. Commun., 6, 8059, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9059</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Siddall, M., Rohling, E. J., Almogi-Labin, A., Hemleben, Ch., Meischner, D.,
Schmelzer, I., and Smeed, D. A.: Sea-level fluctuations during the last
glacial cycle, Nature, 423, 853–858, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01690" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01690</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Snyder, C. W.: Evolution of global temperature over the past two million
years, Nature, 538, 226–228, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19798" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19798</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spratt, R. M. and Lisiecki, L. E.: A Late Pleistocene sea level stack, Clim. Past, 12, 1079–1092, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-1079-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-1079-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stevenard, N.: NathStevenard/sststack: Release v1.0.0 (v1.0.0), Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17209465" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17209465</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stevenard, N.: A harmonized SST compilation across MIS 8, Terminations III
and IIIa, and MIS 7 (260–190&thinsp;ka&thinsp;BP), Zenodo [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18836495" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18836495</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stevenard, N., Capron, É., Legrain, É., and Coutelle, C.: Global and regional sea-surface temperature changes over the Marine Isotopic Stage 9e and Termination IV, Clim. Past, 21, 1895–1916, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-1895-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-1895-2025</a>, 2025.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stocker, T. F. and Johnsen, S. J.: A minimum thermodynamic model for the
bipolar seesaw, Paleoceanography, 18, 2003PA000920, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003PA000920" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003PA000920</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tierney, J. E. and Tingley, M. P.: BAYSPLINE: A New Calibration for the
Alkenone Paleothermometer, Paleoceanog. Paleoclimatol., 33, 281–301,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017PA003201" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017PA003201</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tierney, J. E., Malevich, S. B., Gray, W., Vetter, L., and Thirumalai, K.:
Bayesian Calibration of the Mg&thinsp;∕&thinsp;Ca Paleothermometer in Planktic Foraminifera, Paleoceanog. Paleoclimatol., 34, 2005–2030,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003744" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003744</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tierney, J. E., Zhu, J., King, J., Malevich, S. B., Hakim, G. J., and
Poulsen, C. J.: Glacial cooling and climate sensitivity revisited, Nature,
584, 569–573, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tzedakis, P. C., Raynaud, D., McManus, J. F., Berger, A., Brovkin, V., and
Kiefer, T.: Interglacial diversity, Nat. Geosci., 2, 751–755,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo660" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo660</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tzedakis, P. C., Wolff, E. W., Skinner, L. C., Brovkin, V., Hodell, D. A., McManus, J. F., and Raynaud, D.: Can we predict the duration of an interglacial?, Clim. Past, 8, 1473–1485, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-1473-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-1473-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tzedakis, P. C., Crucifix, M., Mitsui, T., and Wolff, E. W.: A simple rule
to determine which insolation cycles lead to interglacials, Nature, 542,
427–432, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21364" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21364</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vázquez Riveiros, N., Waelbroeck, C., Skinner, L., Roche, D. M.,
Duplessy, J.-C., and Michel, E.: Response of South Atlantic deep waters to
deglacial warming during Terminations V and I, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 298, 323–333, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.08.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.08.003</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Watanabe, Y., Abe-Ouchi, A., Saito, F., Kino, K., O'ishi, R., Ito, T.,
Kawamura, K., and Chan, W.-L.: Astronomical forcing shaped the timing of
early Pleistocene glacial cycles, Commun. Earth Environ., 4, 113,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00765-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00765-x</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wendt, K. A., Li, X., Edwards, R. L., Cheng, H., and Spötl, C.: Precise timing of MIS 7 substages from the Austrian Alps, Clim. Past, 17, 1443–1454, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1443-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1443-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yin, Q. and Berger, A.: Interglacial analogues of the Holocene and its
natural near future, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 120, 28–46,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.04.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.04.008</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yin, Q. Z. and Berger, A.: Individual contribution of insolation and CO2 to
the interglacial climates of the past 800,000 years, Clim. Dynam., 38, 709–724, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1013-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1013-5</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
