<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">CP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Climate of the Past</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">CP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Clim. Past</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1814-9332</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/cp-21-1043-2025</article-id><title-group><article-title>Closing the Plio-Pleistocene <sup>13</sup>C  cycle in the 405 kyr periodicity by isotopic signatures of geological sources</article-title><alt-title>Closing the Plio-Pleistocene <sup>13</sup>C cycle in the 405 kyr periodicity</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Köhler</surname><given-names>Peter</given-names></name>
          <email>peter.koehler@awi.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0904-8484</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, P.O. Box 12 01 61, 27515 Bremerhaven, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Peter Köhler (peter.koehler@awi.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>13</day><month>June</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>1043</fpage><lpage>1060</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>September</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>8</day><month>October</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>February</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day><month>February</month><year>2025</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 Peter Köhler</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1043/2025/cp-21-1043-2025.html">This article is available from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1043/2025/cp-21-1043-2025.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1043/2025/cp-21-1043-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1043/2025/cp-21-1043-2025.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e97">The <sup>13</sup>C cycle of the Plio-Pleistocene, as recorded in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of benthic foraminifera, has power in periodicities related to the long eccentricity cycle of 405 kyr that is missing in corresponding climate records (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O). Using a global carbon cycle model, I show in an inverse approach that   the long eccentricity in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C might have been caused by variations in the isotopic signature of geological sources, namely of the  weathered carbonate rock (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or of volcanically released CO<sub>2</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This closure of the <sup>13</sup>C cycle in these periodicities also explains the offset in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> seen between the Penultimate Glacial Maximum (PGM) and the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). The necessary isotopic signatures in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which align my simulations with reconstructions of the <sup>13</sup>C cycle on orbital timescales, have the most power in the obliquity band (41 kyr), suggesting that land ice dynamics are the ultimate cause for these suggested variations. Since the Asian monsoon as reconstructed from speleothems also has an obliquity-related component and since precipitation (or runoff) is one main driver for local weathering rates, it is possible that these proposed changes in weathering are indeed, at least partly, connected to the monsoon as previously suggested. Alternatively, the suggested impact of land ice or sea level on volcanic activity might also be influential for the <sup>13</sup>C cycle. This indirect influence of ice sheets on the long eccentricity cycle in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C implies that these processes might not have been responsible for the 405 kyr periodicity found in times of the pre-Pliocene parts of the Cenozoic that have been largely ice-free in the Northern Hemisphere.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e284">The long eccentricity cycle with a periodicity of 405 kyr is missing in most climate signals for the last 5 Myr, e.g. in the benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.1"/>, but is imprinted on the global carbon cycle, since significant power in it is contained in benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.2"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. For earlier parts of the Cenozoic, the 405 kyr cycle is not only found in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C but also in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.3"/>. This  difference between climate and carbon cycle makes the interpretation of the Plio-Pleistocene <sup>13</sup>C cycle, and related interpretations with respect to processes responsible for changes in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, challenging.</p>
      <p id="d2e361">Some interpretations of the impact of long eccentricity on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C  have been put forward. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.4"/> used a carbon cycle box model to analyse how oceanic processes, e.g. small changes in nutrient availability or in the ratio of organic matter to CaCO<sub>3</sub> in the export production, might have  caused these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C changes. They already point out  that changes in only the <sup>13</sup>C cycle but not in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, and therefore global climate, are difficult to explain. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.5"/> used a slightly different box model and proposed that eccentricity impacts on the weathering intensity and nutrient supply ultimately changed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C  in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 kyr periodicity during the Miocene. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.6"/> used a conceptual model and suggested that riverine organic carbon inputs into the ocean caused by sea-level-related erosion at river mouths  might be responsible for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 kyr variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of the last 4 Ma. In a data review, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.7"/> also proposed that the origin of this low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C frequency is related to riverine input but suggested that the underlying process is the monsoon intensity.</p>
      <p id="d2e474">While the long-term changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the ocean have long been known <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.8"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, the record of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> from ice cores is still relatively new and, at 155 kyr, rather short <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.9"/>. New ice core data across Termination IV (around 340 kyr BP) offer another <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 kyr long snapshot of changes in  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.10"/>. When  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> data across Termination II were first measured <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.11"/>, an apparent offset between the Penultimate Glacial Maximum and the Last Glacial Maximum (PGM and LGM, respectively) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> prevented a straightforward interpretation of the data. Among other possibilities, the authors speculated that geological processes, namely changes in the isotopic ratio of carbonate weathering or in the contributions from volcanic input fluxes, might explain this offset in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub>. However, it had not yet been discussed in the ice core community <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.12"/> if the PGM-to-LGM offset in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> and the long eccentricity cycle in benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C were related to each other.</p>
      <p id="d2e639">Here, I use the well-established global carbon cycle box model BICYCLE-SE <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.13"/> to test in detail if these  geological processes proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.14"/> might indeed be responsible for the PGM-to-LGM offset in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> and eventually also for the changes in the <sup>13</sup>C cycle related to the long eccentricity. For that effort, I first reanalyse previously published simulations which were performed with an updated <sup>13</sup>C cycle over the time window covered by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.15"/>. In that study, atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> was already prescribed by the ice core data in some simulations and not internally calculated in the model. This approach indirectly introduced some long-term variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C to the whole <sup>13</sup>C cycle, while the boundary conditions changing the main carbon cycle and CO<sub>2</sub> were not modified. I first analyse if and how these changes in <sup>13</sup>C necessary for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> to agree with ice core reconstructions might have been caused by the two geological processes of interest. I then add further scenarios to my assessment, in which one variable of the <sup>13</sup>C cycle in the model is not prescribed by data but only weakly nudged to a  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C time series. This nudging approach reduces the amount of necessary adjustments considerably and is first applied to atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> and then expanded to deep-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in order to be able to cover simulations longer than 155 kyr. Building on earlier work, I then extend my investigation to simulations covering the ice core time window of the last 800 kyr <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.16"/> and finally the last 5 Myr covering most of the Plio-Pleistocene <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.17"/>. Such an approach of nudging the model to data is an inverse investigation, which offers new insights not directly (or only with a time-consuming effort) available from classical forward modelling. While in the latter well-defined hypotheses are tested by changing the boundary conditions or processes beforehand in simulated scenarios, the inverse approach offers solutions one might not have been looking for (e.g. unexpected frequencies in the variables of investigation). As a side effect, my nudging approach might also increase  the simulated glacial–interglacial (G-IG) amplitudes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the earlier parts of the Plio-Pleistocene and bring them in better agreement with reconstructions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.18"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Data</title>
      <p id="d2e877">To perform this analysis, the following data (reconstruction) are needed: Plio-Pleistocene deep-ocean time series of benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, all available atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> from ice cores and Late Pleistocene surface-ocean (planktic) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and estimates on the variability in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signature from carbonate rock weathering and volcanic CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing. These data are described in detail in this subsection.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e956">Deep Pacific Plio-Pleistocene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C data based on either ODP846  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx57" id="paren.19"/> or a stack from six cores <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.20"/>. The temporal resolution is 1 kyr in the stack and partly up to 2 kyr in ODP846, and these values are interpolated to an equidistant 1 kyr for further analysis. <bold>(a)</bold> G-IG amplitudes of records shown in panel <bold>(b)</bold>. Here, the difference between a glacial minimum and the subsequent interglacial maximum is calculated following the MIS boundary definition of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.21"/>, with points being positioned at mid-transitions. <bold>(b)</bold> Time series. The 400 kyr running means and a five-point running mean of ODP846 are added to improve comparison to the stack. The vertical line at 3 Myr BP marks the start point of the records for the analysis shown in panel <bold>(c)</bold>. <bold>(c)</bold> Normalised data density distribution of the last 3 Myr of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C time series shown in panel <bold>(b)</bold>. <bold>(d)</bold> Wavelet of the 5 Myr long five-point running mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C from ODP846. <bold>(e)</bold> Wavelet of the 3 Myr long deep Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C stack.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1043/2025/cp-21-1043-2025-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>2.1.1</label><title>Plio-Pleistocene deep-ocean time series</title>
      <p id="d2e1051">Due to the large volume of the Pacific Ocean, whole-ocean changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C are approximated to a first order with benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C data from the deep Pacific. Under this premise, a deep Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C stack consisting of six sediment cores <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.22"/> illustrates the variability in oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C over the last 3 Myr (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b), which is in its long-term variability, but with higher short-term scatter and a lower long-term mean by 0.1 ‰, nicely matched by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C from ODP846 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.23"/>, which is also one of the cores contributing to the stack. This core, ODP846 (3307 m water depth, 91° W close to the Equator), extends further back in time and is used here as published in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.24"/> in order to cover a 5 Myr long time window  (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1125">Climate change. <bold>(a)</bold> Glacial–interglacial amplitudes of records shown in panel <bold>(b)</bold>. Here, the difference between a glacial minimum and the subsequent interglacial maximum is calculated following the MIS boundary definition of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.25"/>. Points are positions at the mid-transitions. <bold>(b)</bold> Benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O from ODP846 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx57" id="paren.26"/> and  Prob-stack <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.27"/>. Wavelets of detrended benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O from <bold>(c)</bold> Prob-stack and <bold>(d)</bold> ODP846 and <bold>(e)</bold> of simulated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> (scenario SEi++V6).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1043/2025/cp-21-1043-2025-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e1194">The stacking of cores always introduces a smoothing effect. Therefore, the width of the data distribution of both time series converges (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) if a five-point running mean is applied to the ODP846 data (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c), which in its raw data is more widely distributed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰). Both deep Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C time series contain significant power in periods longer than 100 kyr in their wavelets (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>d, e), not only around 405 kyr (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 kyr in the last 1 Myr), but also in between the eccentricity bands (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 kyr periodicities). While the latter variability is not known from orbital forcing, it has already been detected in terrestrial sediments of the early Paleocene and might be a sub-harmonic of the 405 kyr periodicity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.28"/>. Alternatively, this power might be related to the 173 kyr periodicity, an amplitude modulation  of the 41 kyr of obliquity, which is also found in the Miocene–Pliocene of the Asian monsoon <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.29"/> and in total organic carbon during the Mesozoic and Cenozoic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.30"/>. Power in periodicity between 100 and 405 kyr during the last 5 Myr is also contained in previous wavelet analysis of so-called benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C mega-splices, but it has never been discussed in more detail <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.31"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1276">Spectral analyses of various climate variables find few of these slow changes during the Plio-Pleistocene. Prob-stack <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.32"/>, the successor to the LR04 benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O stack <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.33"/> based on 180 instead of 57 records, contains little power in 405 kyr periodicity during the last 2.5 Myr but some power earlier on (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b, c), similarly to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O in ODP846, the deep Pacific core containing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C used here <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx57" id="paren.34"/> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b, d). This long eccentricity cycle is also missing in the last 2.5 Myr and is only weakly contained earlier in  time series of my simulated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>e). For the interpretation of the rather unusual frequencies around 200 kyr in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and the absence of the long eccentricity in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, one should keep in mind that the response of a nonlinear system might exhibit frequencies not present in the original driven forcing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.35"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1367">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C from carbonate rock from Earth's history. <bold>(a)</bold> Precambrian values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C calcite and dolomite rock as compiled in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.36"/>. <bold>(b)</bold> Phanerozoic values as compiled in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.37"/>. <bold>(c)</bold> Normalised density plot of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C data (broken line: Precambrian; solid line: Phanerozoic). The standard (std) parameter value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ used in the BICYCLE-SE model is also marked.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1043/2025/cp-21-1043-2025-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e1445">Furthermore, during the Mid-Pleistocene Transition (MPT) around 1 Ma, climate  changed from a dominantly 41 kyr periodicity during the Pliocene and Early Pleistocene to a 100 kyr periodicity on average in the Late Pleistocene <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.38"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Since there is hardly any change in incoming solar radiation with power in the 100 kyr band <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.39"/>, this MPT is still not completely understood, but it has so far been hypothesised to have been caused by non-linear processes in the carbon cycle–climate system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.40"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. An accompanying feature of the MPT is the rise in G-IG amplitudes, as, for example, seen in benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.41"/> or in global temperature compilations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.42"/>. Benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C  also includes this transition in power from 41 kyr to 100 kyr frequency across the MPT <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.43"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. However, G-IG amplitudes in benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C only gradually increase over the Plio-Pleistocene. In both the deep Pacific core ODP846 or the deep Pacific stack in the 41 kyr world, the size of these amplitudes is on average 68 %–76 % of their mean amplitude found in the 100 kyr world of the last 1 Myr (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a). This is markedly different from benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, whose G-IG amplitudes in the 41 kyr world have been on average only 35 %–39 % of their size during the last 1 Myr (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a).</p>
      <p id="d2e1522">These two aspects, long eccentricity cycle and G-IG amplitudes, in which  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C differs from climate variables during the  Plio-Pleistocene, suggest that the carbon cycle and the climate system are partly decoupled on orbital timescales.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>2.1.2</label><title>Late Pleistocene surface-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub></title>
      <p id="d2e1576">The continuous 155 kyr long time series  of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.44"/> has been shown to be highly correlated, especially on orbital timescales, to two monospecific stacks of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C from planktic foraminifera from latitudes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, also called wider tropics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.45"/>. This latter study could not identify any impact of the so-called carbonate ion effect proposed from laboratory experiments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.46"/>, which is why the planktic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C stacks can be regarded as reliable recorders of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in dissolved inorganic carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the surface ocean of the wider tropics. Underlying data were compiled from sediments cores at latitudes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, roughly in agreement with the non-polar (sometimes called equatorial) surface-ocean boxes in the model. To my knowledge, there exists no robust longer time series of planktic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Due to the shortness of these time series, a spectral analysis with focus on the long eccentricity cycle is not possible. However, these data might be helpful in a comparison with simulation results. Recently, another <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 kyr long part of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> across Termination IV was published <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.47"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>2.1.3</label><title>The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signature of the geological source of carbonate weathering</title>
      <p id="d2e1744">Present-day mountains were built during the Phanerozoic (the last 540 Myr),  but there are also various areas with Precambrian shields (older than 540 Myr), e.g. in North America <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.48"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. It is thus worth considering how <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in carbonate rocks (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) changed over these time spans. The records of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in carbonates during the  Phanerozoic  (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b) have varied for most of the last 440 Myr between 0 ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with short-term excursions up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.49"/>. The earliest part of the  Phanerozoic (440–540 Myr) covering the Cambrian and the Ordovician generally contained lower values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 0 ‰), with peaks up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.50"/>. A compilation of raw whole-rock <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C isotope data for limestone and dolomite for  the Precambrian  (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a) contains a huge scatter from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a few excursions up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 ‰ <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.51"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1915">Calculated density distributions  of these time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c)  are  nearly normally distributed for the Phanerozoic, with the mode being slightly lower (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) than the chosen standard parameter values of  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the BICYCLE-SE model (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1"/>). Here, data are interpolated to 10-year equidistant values before analysis. Data from the Precambrian have much larger gaps than for the Phanerozoic, which is why interpolation is not applied. The distribution of the Precambrian <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, combining both calcite and dolomite, is wider than for the Phanerozoic, with a small mean value (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS4">
  <label>2.1.4</label><title>The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signature of volcanic CO<sub>2</sub></title>
      <p id="d2e2042">In BICYCLE-SE, a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of volcanic CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is assumed, agreeing   with a typical endmember value from mantle material <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.52"/>. However,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data are only available from modern observations, and their variability in the past is unknown. Mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB) volcanism  contributes about 15 % to the  global volcanic CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing rate in the present day <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.53"/> and contains a range of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰  to  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.54"/>. The collected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from more than 70 arc volcanoes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.55"/> are on average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range in arc volcanoes would narrow significantly to an uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ if weighted by CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes. However, such a weighting is not well constrained, and CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes of different arc  systems might have varied in the past. Newer data on arc volcanism from Baja California <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.56"/>, not yet included in the review of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.57"/>,  show volcanic CO<sub>2</sub> being more depleted in <sup>13</sup>C, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being as low as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰. Similarly to MORB, the arc volcanism is also responsible for about 15 % of the annual volcanic CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.58"/>. Furthermore, new data on a 2021 volcanic eruption in Iceland  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.59"/> found a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰. This is within the range of Icelandic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.60"/> but on the upper end of the Gaussian distribution given by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ by which the Icelandic compilation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.61"/> is condensed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.62"/>. Indications for  temporal variations  in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in individual volcanoes also exist. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.63"/> detected a positive trend in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Etna, rising from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ within 3–4 decades of the recent past. Altogether, the collected data suggest large heterogeneity of the mantle source, making a temporal fast-changing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (as suggested here) plausible. However, although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data from arc volcanism and MORB are reasonably well covered, the related CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes add up to only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the global volcanic outgassing. Thus, a complete picture of the variety of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> including other sources, such as hotspot volcanoes, tectonic degassing, and volcanic lakes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.64"/>, is still missing.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Model</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>The carbon cycle box model BICYCLE-SE</title>
      <p id="d2e2564">The carbon cycle box model BICYCLE-SE is fully described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.65"/>, and its <sup>13</sup>C cycle has recently been updated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.66"/>. This model version has recently been used to show that simulated changes in the radiocarbon age of the ocean between the LGM and preindustrial times  agree reasonably well with reconstructions, although, on millennial timescales (ignored here), abrupt changes in  ocean circulation related to the bipolar seesaw need to be considered to meet deep-ocean <sup>14</sup>C data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.67"/>. Briefly, the BICYCLE core of the model consists of 10 ocean boxes, 7 boxes for terrestrial carbon pools, and 1 box for the atmosphere. Carbon and the carbon isotopes (and alkalinity, O<sub>2</sub>, and PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ocean) are  calculated state variables of the model with explicitly considered carbonate chemistry in the ocean that distributes DIC as function of temperature, salinity, and pressure into its three chemical species (CO<sub>2</sub>, HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In its update to a solid Earth (SE) version, the model now contains a process-based sediment module that calculates, depending on carbonate chemistry, either the accumulation or the dissolution of CaCO<sub>3</sub> in the deep ocean and the shallow water loss of CaCO<sub>3</sub> due to coral reef growth, simplistically calculated as a function of chemistry and sea level change. A  fixed fraction of 0.6 % of <sup>13</sup>C-depleted organic matter of the export production of organic carbon that reaches the deep-ocean boxes is permanently buried in the sediment (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gC yr<sup>−1</sup>  in preindustrial times). Thus, organic carbon plays no active role in the sediment module, since its implementation would ask for much more complexity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.68"/>, potentially unavailable in  box models. The main goal of the sediment module is to mimic the carbonate compensation feedback <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.69"/>, which, according to a model–data comparison of deep-ocean CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.70"/>, is sufficiently obtained <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.71"/>. The simulated export of CaCO<sub>3</sub> and organic carbon to the sediment is higher during glacial times than during interglacials by about 50 %, roughly in agreement with  reconstructions  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.72"/>. Furthermore, carbonate and silicate weathering fluxes (on average 12 Tmol yr<sup>−1</sup> each) introduce, either constantly or as a function of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, a flux of bicarbonate (changing  the total amount of both carbon and alkalinity) into the surface ocean. Volcanic CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing on land as  a time-delayed function of changing land ice volume, or from island and hotspot volcanoes as a time-delayed function of sea level change (both delayed by 4 kyr; see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="altparen.73"/>), are other external carbon sources to the model (about 5–15 Tmol yr<sup>−1</sup>). More details are found in the earlier papers describing the model.</p>
      <p id="d2e2796">Isotopic fractionation occurs mainly during gas exchange and biological production on land and in the ocean. The sizes of the corresponding fractionations  in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> notation (in ‰) are summarised in Fig. S1 in the Supplement. Furthermore, the isotopic signatures of the external inputs of carbon in the simulated system  –  of the  weathered carbonate rock (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and of the volcanic CO<sub>2</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) – are necessary parameters of the model, which so far have been constantly prescribed  by the mentioned values.</p>
      <p id="d2e2865">Climate change (ocean circulation, temperature, sea level and sea ice, aeolian iron input) influencing the marine carbon pumps and land carbon storage is prescribed externally from reconstructions. Here, I use different setups, either covering the 800 kyr long time window with ice core data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.74"/> or the last 5 Myr with most of the Plio-Pleistocene <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.75"/>. Forcing details were described in the relevant studies but are summarised in the Supplement (Figs. S2–S3).</p>
      <p id="d2e2878">In the model geometry, all of the Indo-Pacific Ocean below 1 km depth is combined in one box called the deep Indo-Pacific. All the relevant deep-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C data to which I compare my simulation results  come from the deep Pacific. I always refer to either of these two elements when talking about the deep (Indo-)Pacific.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Reducing the model–data offset in the <sup>13</sup>C cycle</title>
      <p id="d2e2910">Various applications have shown that the model seems to be able to simulate G-IG changes in the carbon cycle in reasonable agreement with various palaeo-data (atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, deep-ocean CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, surface-ocean pH, deep-ocean <sup>14</sup>C) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.76"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, while the long-term changes  in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C as found in the reconstructions are so far  not contained in a satisfactory manner in the model output <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.77"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Instead of searching for solutions which satisfy equally well the data constraints given by the carbon cycle itself and its stable carbon isotope, I follow a different, inverse approach. I take the main carbon cycle, including simulated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> as given, and analyse how changes in the isotopic signatures of the external input of carbon in the simulated system need to vary to align the simulated <sup>13</sup>C cycle, especially on orbital timescales, with data. In doing so, I come to one possible realisation of how the carbon cycle might have changed in the past, which agrees reasonably well with  reconstructions of atmospheric carbon records (CO<sub>2</sub>  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub>) and marine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, but I cannot exclude that other solutions might exist. Note that the long-term effect of changes in the weathering flux strength, not its isotopic signature, on the <sup>13</sup>C cycle has recently been investigated with step changes in the Bern3D model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.78"/>, finding that equilibrium in the  <sup>13</sup>C cycle is only reached after a few hundred thousand years, while that of CO<sub>2</sub> (and of climate) is reached  1 order of magnitude faster.</p>
      <p id="d2e3057">For that effort, I apply additional constraints to the model. I overwrite (or prescribe) one internally calculated variable of the <sup>13</sup>C cycle with reconstructions. This would in principle violate mass conservation of <sup>13</sup>C but not if all necessary changes can be explained by variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the isotopic signatures of the geological sources.  In a post-processing analysis, I determine their necessary values from model-internal information as described in the following. Initial results already informed me that, when prescribing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub>, the necessary anomalies in isotopic signatures of the external carbon sources need to be a lot larger than the reconstructed ranges. In an alternative approach, I therefore only weakly nudge the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C variable to its reconstruction. This approach can be used to check on necessary changes in either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to align simulations with reconstructions. Both constraints (prescribing or nudging) are applied to either atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> or deep Indo-Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Since my solution is obtained from model–data differences (and not as a hypothesis to be tested that has been put into the model in a transient forward simulation), it can be called an inverse approach. Such inverse approaches typically do not lead to unique solutions but offer new insights that are otherwise not (or hardly) available.</p>
      <p id="d2e3206">In detail, this approach works as follows: for each year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the data would require a change <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in units of ‰ yr<sup>−1</sup>) in one variable of the model (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">model</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), e.g.
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M229" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">data</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">model</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e3321">The difference between this data–model offset <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the internally calculated change in this variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">model</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">internal</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, weighted by the nudging strength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is  the applied correction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cor</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M234" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cor</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">model</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">internal</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            which is added to the differential equation
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M235" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">model</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">final</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">model</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">internal</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cor</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e3560">If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, these equations simplify to
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M237" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">model</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">final</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            and the approach describes the prescription of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C with data. In other words, prescription is the most extreme case of nudging.</p>
      <p id="d2e3633">In the post-processing, it is calculated how <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cor</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be caused by changes in the isotopic signature of the external sources to the simulated carbon cycle. Thus, the following hypothetical isotopic signatures for the external fluxes are calculated:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M240" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cor</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">std</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            and
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M241" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cor</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">std</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e3819">Summary of applied simulation scenarios. The column “control” marks the control runs with “yes” or names the related controls.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="12cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Name<sup>*</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Length</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Control</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4" align="left">Description</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SEi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">800 kyr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Yes</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4" align="left">Control run SE from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.81"/> with updated <sup>13</sup>C cycle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.82"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">210 kyr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SEi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4" align="left">Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> is prescribed from data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.83"/>.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">210 kyr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SEi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4" align="left">Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> is nudged to data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.84"/>.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">800 kyr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SEi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4" align="left">Deep Indo-Pacific Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C is prescribed from the six-core stack of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.85"/>.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">800 kyr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SEi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4" align="left">Deep Indo-Pacific Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C is nudged to the six-core stack of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.86"/>.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SEi++V6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 Myr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Yes</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4" align="left">Run SE++V6 from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.87"/> with strong weathering and 6 % decline in volcanic outgassing 4–1 Myr  with updated <sup>13</sup>C cycle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.88"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D1-L</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3 Myr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SEi++V6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4" align="left">Deep Indo-Pacific Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C is prescribed from the six-core stack of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.89"/>.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D2-L</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3 Myr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SEi++V6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4" align="left">Deep Indo-Pacific Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C is nudged to the six-core stack of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.90"/>.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D2-P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 Myr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SEi++V6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4" align="left">Deep Indo-Pacific Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C is nudged to the five-point running mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C from ODP846 as presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.91"/>.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e3822"><sup>*</sup> Naming convention: in non-control scenarios, the first letter indicates what kind of data are used (C: atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub>; D: deep Indo-Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C), and the number indicates the form of data usage (1: prescribing; 2: nudging). Names with extended endings indicate 3–5 Myr long runs based on different data sets (-L: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="altparen.79"/>; -P: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="altparen.80"/>).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e4204">Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the amount of carbon  (in units gC) at time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmosphere, when nudging to atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub>, or in the deep Indo-Pacific Ocean box, when nudging to deep Indo-Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, with  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the annual fluxes (in units of gC yr<sup>−1</sup>) in carbonate weathering and volcanic outgassing, respectively. The factor 0.5 in the denominator in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) acknowledges that only half of the carbon in carbonate weathering has its source in weathered rock <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.92"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. In my 800 kyr long simulations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is constant at 12 Tmol yr<sup>−1</sup> (0.144 PgC yr<sup>−1</sup>), while it varies as a function of CO<sub>2</sub> between 10–15 Tmol yr<sup>−1</sup>  (0.12–0.18 PgC yr<sup>−1</sup>) during the multi-million-year-long runs. The volcanic CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing flux (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 5–16 Tmol yr<sup>−1</sup> or 0.06–0.192 PgC yr<sup>−1</sup>) is a 4 kyr time-delayed function of  sea level change <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.93"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4448">I determined the  strength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when nudging to deep Indo-Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C by comparing the resulting width of the distribution in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the reconstructions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c). A comparable strength of the nudging is inversely related to the amount of carbon in the relevant box. Due to there being 30 times more carbon in the deep Indo-Pacific box than in the atmosphere, it was inferred that  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For reasons of simplicity and due to a lack of data, the same nudging strength is used when calculating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4554">In my setup, all CO<sub>2</sub> from volcanic outgassing is directly released into the atmosphere. It has been shown <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.94"/> that submarine and subaerial injections of volcanic CO<sub>2</sub> lead to similar changes in the carbon cycle  on multi-millennial timescales, making a distinction of volcanism in the two subgroups irrelevant here. Important for long-term CO<sub>2</sub> is the amount of carbon added to the atmosphere–ocean–biosphere system, not the location of the injection. This is also the reason why I investigate (a) how changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which, as part of weathering (or of bicarbonate injection), enters the system in the surface ocean, might have an influence on atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> and (b) how both weathering and volcanism might change deep-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Furthermore, these insights also suggest that, for cases of very strong nudging, as found in the  prescribing scenarios, results can probably not be explained by isotopic signature changes in the external carbon fluxes.</p>
      <p id="d2e4635">As a final check for my hypothesis that the long-term changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C might be caused by the isotopic signature of the external sources to the carbon cycle, I compared  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C from nudging scenarios with simulations in which either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as derived from Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>)–(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>), is externally prescribed (Fig. S4). Differences between both setups are generally less than 0.02 ‰ in various variables of the <sup>13</sup>C cycle for the last 800 kyr, supporting my post-processing approach to reliably calculate the necessary isotopic signatures of these two fluxes in order to reduce the model–data offset in the <sup>13</sup>C cycle.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e4737">Closure of the <sup>13</sup>C cycle on 405 kyr periodicity. From top to bottom: atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in DIC of surface water of the wider tropics or in the deep Indo-Pacific; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cor</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for different scenarios, including reconstructions of CO<sub>2</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.95"/>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the surface ocean  of the wider tropics (anomalies to the LGM in the monospecific stack of <italic>G. ruber</italic> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rub</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="altparen.96"/>) or in the deep Pacific from the six-core stack <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.97"/> or ODP846 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.98"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cor</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated from <bold>(a)</bold> atmospheric  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> or from <bold>(b, c)</bold> deep Indo-Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C. In panel <bold>(c)</bold>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>G-IG</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is included for CO<sub>2</sub> (first row, right <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis) and (third row) Indo-Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (gold open circles for the 3 Myr long deep Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C stack). No <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in DIC of the wider tropical surface ocean is plotted in panel <bold>(c)</bold>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>G-IG</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the difference between a glacial minimum and the subsequent interglacial maximum is calculated following the MIS boundary definition of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.99"/>, with points being positioned at mid-transitions. The results in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cor</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the prescribed scenarios (C1, D1, D1-L) cover a wider range and are excluded here but are shown in Fig. S6.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1043/2025/cp-21-1043-2025-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>2.2.3</label><title>Scenarios</title>
      <p id="d2e5113">My standard run  (SEi) is based on the 800 kyr long scenario SE in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.100"/>, with updates, mainly in the <sup>13</sup>C cycle,  as  described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.101"/>. Prescribing and nudging to atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.102"/> are performed in scenarios C1 and C2, respectively. Here, simulations are started at 210 kyr BP in the interglacial around MIS 7a-c, and the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> before 155 kyr is assumed to stay constant. The whole 800 kyr long runs are alternatively prescribed with (D1) and nudged to (D2) the deep Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C stack. For an even longer perspective, I rely on the 5 Myr long runs published in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.103"/>. Here, I choose a scenario based on run SE++V6, in which weathering is strongly coupled to atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and volcanic outgassing decreases by 6 % between 4 and 1 Myr BP, leading to a gradual decline in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>. Tests have shown that the findings I describe further below are also robust for other scenarios included in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.104"/>, with different weathering strength and volcanic history leading to alternative atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> time series. Even when forced with the new 4.5 Myr long compilation of changes in surface temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.105"/>, which contains some power in periodicities slower than 100 kyr, my conclusions stay the same. I distinguish between a control run (SEi++V6), 3 Myr long runs in which deep Indo-Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C is either prescribed with (D1-L) or nudged to (D2-L)  the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C stack from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.106"/>, and a 5 Myr long run (D2-P) nudged to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in ODP846 as presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.107"/>. An overview of all scenarios is compiled in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e5267">Wavelets of either the deep Indo-Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <bold>(a–d)</bold> or my solution for <bold>(e, f)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and <bold>(g, h)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for different scenarios (left: SEi or D2; right: SEi++V6 or D2-P). Results are restricted to the last 4.5 Myr to avoid long spinup effects, and only  data in panel <bold>(b)</bold> were detrended before spectral analysis. </p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1043/2025/cp-21-1043-2025-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Analysis tools</title>
      <p id="d2e5345">I use R <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.108"/> for calculating wavelets with WaveletComp <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.109"/> and the package seewave, version 2.2.3, for further frequency analysis including coherence. In all wavelet figures, the white lines mark the 0.1 significant level and the yellow lines mark the ridges of the power distribution. Detrending of data was performed   with MATLAB <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.110"/>.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e5359">Distribution of the carbon isotopic signature of <bold>(a, b)</bold> carbonate rock (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)  and of  <bold>(c, d)</bold> volcanic CO<sub>2</sub>  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from Earth's history in data and simulations. More details on the rock data  are found in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>. Simulations up to 800 kyr long <bold>(a, c)</bold> versus multi-million-year-long simulations <bold>(b, d)</bold>. The  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data in panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> are from modern observations. The distribution of  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data, not weighted by CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes, from the review of arc volcanoes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.111"/> is shown here under the assumption of a normal distribution with  mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰. Additionally, the range of  data from  newer studies on arc volcanism in Baja California <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.112"/> and the exemplary ranges from non-arc volcanism  of mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB)  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.113"/> and Iceland <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.114"/> are given. Vertical broken lines mark the standard (std) parameter values used in the model. </p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1043/2025/cp-21-1043-2025-f06.png"/>

        </fig>


</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d2e5522">Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> as simulated in my scenarios is shown as a control  (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, first row)  against data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.115"/>. This is chosen here as an indicator of the dynamics of the  carbon cycle, in depth discussions of which are covered in previous papers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.116"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5542">The control simulations (without prescription or nudging to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C) contain typical multi-millennial variations of the order of 0.5 ‰ in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, second row) and 0.3 ‰ in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the wider tropical surface ocean (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, third row)  and G-IG variations of   0.5 ‰ in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the deep Indo-Pacific (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, fourth row) during the Late Pleistocene. As shown before <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.117"/>, atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the wider tropical surface ocean are highly correlated on orbital timescales of 41 kyr  periodicities. In scenarios C1 (prescribed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub>) and C2 (nudged to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub>), there is also a loose correlation between atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub>  and deep Indo-Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C on these timescales (Fig. S5), with a coherence that rose from below 0.2 in scenario SEi to 0.6 (C1) or 0.4 (C2). A tighter correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the deep ocean and the atmosphere is  not expected, since the marine carbon pumps introduce vertical gradients in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.118"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, with opposite effects on  atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> (or surface-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and deep-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C on G-IG timescales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.119"/>. Therefore, there has to be a certain anti-correlation between atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub>/surface-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C on the one hand and  deep Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C on the other hand. In other words, prescribing or nudging to atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub>  or  deep Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C always increases the agreement of the simulations to the reconstructions in the other variable, but a perfect fit in the other endmember of the  <sup>13</sup>C cycle is not expected. In scenarios C2 and D2, the long-term evolution from PGM to LGM in both atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> and wider surface-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C   is covered in the simulations, but the local maxima in the data around 80 kyr BP are not contained, suggesting that internal processes in the atmosphere–ocean–biosphere subsystem rather than these solid Earth fluxes are responsible for these anomalies, which occur on shorter timescales. Millennial-scale changes in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> between 70 and 60 kyr BP have already been successfully explained by such internal processes, namely rapid changes in terrestrial carbon pools and/or Southern Ocean air–sea gas exchange  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.120"/>, which  were probably also active around 80 kyr BP.</p>
      <p id="d2e5938">The introduction of the long-term periodicities into my simulated <sup>13</sup>C cycle can be seen in the spectral analysis. Wavelets  show, apart from the time window 4–3 Myr BP, no power in periodicities beyond 100 kyr in the deep Indo-Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the  control simulations SEi and SEi++V6 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, b), but simulations contain power comparable to the data around 400 kyr and also in 200 kyr periodicities when nudged to the reconstructions (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c, d and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c, d). I therefore conclude that, on these slow timescales, my nudged simulations  are in reasonable agreement with the data.</p>
      <p id="d2e5967">The time series of   <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> necessary to close the <sup>13</sup>C cycle in the long eccentricity timescale are found in the two lowermost rows of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> for the nudged scenarios (C2, D2, D2-L, D2-P), while those of the prescribed scenarios (C1, D1, D1-L) are due to the larger data scatter plotted with different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes in Fig. S6, which otherwise repeats  Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. The resulting density distributions of both  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  together with the data constraints, are compiled in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>. When prescribing one <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C record from data (scenarios C1, D1, D1-L), it is clearly seen that the necessary distributions of the parameter values are with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) much wider than what reconstructions are suggesting (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ for  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ for  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from present-day arc volcanoes). This finding indicates that a prescription of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, during which the model would follow the reconstruction not only on orbital timescales but also during shorter multi-millennia anomalies, cannot be explained by the isotopic signature of either carbonate rock or volcanic outgassing. In other words, the scenarios C1, D1, and D1-L are unrealistic with respect to an explanation of the 405 kyr periodicity in the <sup>13</sup>C cycle  and can be discarded here.</p>
      <p id="d2e6223">In the nudged simulations  (scenarios C2, D2, D2-L, D2-P), the resulting  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vary on orbital (and sometimes faster) timescales over the whole parameter range provided by the reconstructions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). While these dynamics challenge our understanding of which processes might have been responsible for them  (see Discussion), the resulting statistics (density distributions) are not unreasonable (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). In detail, the nudged 800 kyr long simulations overlap well with the Phanerozoic reconstructions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in carbonate rock (D2: 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.0 ‰), while, in longer simulations, I find even tighter distributions but with lower mean values (D2-L:   0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6 ‰; D2-P:  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.0 ‰) more in agreement with  the Precambrian <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C rock data (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a, b). Similarly, the mean in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is lower in nudged multi-million-year simulations than in those covering only 800 kyr (D2: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0 ‰; D2-L: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7 ‰; D2-P: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0 ‰), and the distributions are, at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, sufficiently narrow and overlap with data of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in volcanic CO<sub>2</sub>  (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c, d). Remember that the nudging strength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined from the width of the distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in scenario D2 to be comparable to the data but that its mean value was never used as a tuning target: it freely evolved from the simulations and the post-processing analysis. The shift towards lower mean values in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for longer simulations is dominantly caused by  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in ODP846 (used for nudging in scenario D2-P) being on average lower than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the deep Pacific stack (used for nudging in scenarios D2 and D2-L).</p>
      <p id="d2e6497">When nudging to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> (scenario C2), I obtain a rather skewed  distribution of  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) which is  wider than the reconstruction from carbonate rock (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a). The width of the solution does not improve if I revise the nudging strength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  within reasonable bounds. Thus, it seems that the shortness of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> time series, which covers not even half of one long eccentricity cycle, is responsible for this unsatisfactory result. The distribution for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) in scenario C2 has a slightly larger mean value, but its width is similar to what I obtain in scenario D2 from longer runs and nudging to deep Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰). However, the shape of the distribution for C2 is, without a clear maximum, very different from a bell-shaped Gaussian curve of a normal distribution (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c). As this analysis initially starts from  understanding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub>, the available data do not yet cover a sufficiently  long period for a complete understanding of the 405 kyr cycle in them, although the recently published new data around 340 kyr BP <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.121"/> fully support my findings so far, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> ranges between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.8</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, much lower than in scenario SEi but in agreement with my scenario D2 (Fig. 4b).</p>
      <p id="d2e6714">As a side effect, my nudging approach also increases the G-IG amplitudes in the simulated <sup>13</sup>C cycle before the MPT. In the data   and in the prescribed scenario D1-L, the G-IG amplitudes in deep Indo-Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C were only reduced to 75 % of their post-MPT size prior to the MPT, while, in the control run SEi++V6, they were reduced to  24 %  (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c). My nudging approach increases these pre-MPT G-IG amplitudes to 41 % (D2-L) and 32 % (D2-P) of their amplitudes during the last 1 Myr, thus partially explaining this feature of the 41 kyr world (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c).</p>
      <p id="d2e6743">Altogether, I conclude that the carbon isotopic signature of either carbonate rocks or volcanic CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing might be the process which closes the  <sup>13</sup>C cycle on  periodicities slower than 100 kyr in the Plio-Pleistocene. Furthermore, the PGM-to-LGM offset in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub>  and the long eccentricity in benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C are potentially caused by the same processes and are therefore related to each other.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e6803">A frequency analysis of the derived solutions for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>e–h) finds that only little power is contained in periodicities beyond 100 kyr. Results for both variables are dominated by power in the obliquity band and some contributions to the 100 kyr band. Between 2–3 Myr BP, some enhanced power in  the  200 kyr periods is contained in  both solutions obtained from scenario D2-P. Modifications in either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  or  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, both with little  power around 405 kyr, lead nevertheless to a persisting occurrence of the long eccentricity in the resulting  <sup>13</sup>C cycle. A transition of power to other frequencies was suggested to be caused by the long residence time of carbon in the ocean during earlier quasi-ice-free periods of the Cenozoic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx81" id="paren.122"/>. However, the power transition was probably happening for other reasons, since the main carbon cycle and CO<sub>2</sub> contain no power in 405 kyr periodicity (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>g–i), which was not the case in these other studies. Looking closer at the spectra of the resulting simulated deep Indo-Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and the inversely obtained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (or  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the same scenario, I  find that the relative power in obliquity (41 kyr) and long eccentricity (405 kyr) is actually similar in both variables (Fig. S7). This similarity, not necessarily obtained from the related wavelets (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>d, f),  supports the connection between both variables and highlights that obliquity is indeed the most important in both time series, while 405 kyr is only weakly contained. Thus, it is not surprising that little 405 kyr power in deep Indo-Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C is derived from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (or  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with  similarly little relative power in the same frequency band.</p>
      <p id="d2e7001">To better understand how variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  or  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with orbital frequencies impact on deep-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, I performed some tests. Using time series of the orbital parameters eccentricity, climate precession, and obliquity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.123"/>, artificial changes in  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  or  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were generated with patterns (mean, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) similar to the reconstructions and then applied to some forward simulations modifying the control run SEi. The results (Fig. S8) show that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a larger effect than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on deep Indo-Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, probably because the related carbon influx (CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing) is about twice as large as that of carbonate rock during weathering. Furthermore, the resulting deep-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C anomalies with respect to SEi are lagging the forcing by about a quarter of the forcing periodicities. This is happening for all orbital forcings and frequencies indicating the time delay by which the deep-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C  reacts to changes in the geological isotopic signatures. In other words, the  change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  or  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained in the nudging approach, which is suggested to be responsible for the slow variations  (405 kyr periodicity)  in deep-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, is delayed accordingly. Although this lag might not be important for  the spectra of  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  or  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> it might need consideration if the hypothesis here is tested in future studies in forward simulations (see below). Furthermore, this lag suggests that the proposed solutions in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  or  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> might lead to some extent to overshooting/undershooting in the target variable, which would influence the amplitudes but not the frequencies. However, since the obtained distributions in both variables are already in agreement with the reconstructions, smaller ranges would only increase their match to the data.</p>
      <p id="d2e7273">The chosen setup restricted my analysis to the inversely obtained changes in the isotopic signatures of the geological sources. Therefore, the  changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are not correlated to the underlying carbon fluxes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), although volcanism was partly a function of the obliquity-dominated changes in  sea level/land ice volume and the strength of the carbonate weathering  in multi-million-year-long runs was related to CO<sub>2</sub>, which is also dominated by obliquity (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>e). Such relationships between fluxes and isotopic signatures, if found, might give further support to this hypothesis, since such connections might be expected from  a process-based perspective. However, previous model results have shown that changing the strength of fluxes without compensating effects very likely changes not only the <sup>13</sup>C cycle but also the underlying main carbon cycle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.124"/>. Thus, such results are not easily obtained but might be searched for in future studies.</p>
      <p id="d2e7351">Obliquity has an influence on incoming solar radiation in the high latitudes and  is therefore thought to  be the  main control for  land ice dynamics in the Northern Hemisphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.125"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Thus, obliquity, together with some influence of precession <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.126"/> and internal feedbacks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.127"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, determines the G-IG cyclicity of the Plio-Pleistocene. Therefore, the dominance of obliquity in my solutions for either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  or  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests that land ice might also play an important role in my closure of the <sup>13</sup>C cycle for slow timescales of the Plio-Pleistocene.</p>
      <p id="d2e7414">Previously, the Pleistocene 400–500 kyr periodicity in marine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C was suggested  to have been caused by continental weathering and monsoon activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx74" id="paren.128"/>, and climate simulations  also highlight the role of the 405 kyr periodicity in tropical precipitation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.129"/>. The Asian monsoon during the last 650 kyr as deduced from detrended <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O in speleothems has significant power in obliquity but in antiphase to  summer insolation at 65° N, which suggests that the ultimate cause for the 41 kyr related changes are situated in the Northern Hemisphere ice sheets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.130"/>. Furthermore, present-day reconstructions of the  continental weathering rates indicate that highly active regions dominate the global signal, with 10 % of the area contributing about 50 % of the global weathering fluxes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.131"/>. This study and others <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.132"/> also identified runoff, which is highly related to precipitation, as one of the dominant controls of local weathering fluxes. Obliquity-controlled monsoon systems therefore have a leverage on weathering, potentially activating contributions from different regions on Earth, with variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  accordingly. I therefore suggest that obliquity-driven changes might also easily control the weathering strength of different areas, finally ending in changes in  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> without the need for large variations in the global weathering flux itself. This influence of obliquity  might operate via monsoon, but a variable contribution of available weatherable rock around dynamic ice sheets in North America and Eurasia or from continental shelves during sea level low stands also seems possible <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.133"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d2e7494">Dominant power in the obliquity band is also contained in the reconstructed activity of the circum-Pacific chain of arc volcanism, sometimes referred to as the “Ring of Fire”, during the last 1 Myr <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.134"/>. In a revised analysis, this power in 41 kyr is reduced and is only second behind 100 kyr <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.135"/>. This spectral analysis supports  hypotheses that changes in land ice load or sea level might influence subaerial or submarine volcanism, respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.136"/>. Note that, in the model, the component of volcanic CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing  that is influenced by either land ice or sea level changes is lagging them by 4 kyr <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.137"/>. In light of known temporal changes in the isotopic signature of individual volcanoes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.138"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> and of the large heterogeneity of the mantle material  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.139"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, the obliquity-related changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as inversely deduced here from the analysis, are therefore also  conceivable.</p>
      <p id="d2e7547">Possible ways of testing the proposed hypothesis of the obliquity-dominated influence on the isotopic signature of the geological sources might be the following. The most direct support might be derived from a forward modelling approach in which the isotopic signature of the geological sources and the strength of the related fluxes are correlated to each other. This would, however, need a data-mining effort, in which fluxes and isotopic signature are spatially connected for the present day. This approach might not generate long time series as done here, but it tries to establish if fast changes in global mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  or  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hypo</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as suggested here, are feasible from  a more process-based understanding. However, unknown mantle heterogeneity and unknown temporal evolution of both local fluxes and local isotopic signatures might make this a rather challenging task. Frequency analysis of various weathering proxies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx72" id="paren.140"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> obtained from sediment cores in different ocean basins might give indications if obliquity played a dominant role on the regional scale, although this would only give indirect evidence on flux strength and not on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Monitoring programmes on present-day volcanoes might give a broader foundation if temporal changes in  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as observed for  the Etna, are  an exception or the rule <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.141"/>. Finally, the connection of the PGM and LGM offset in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub>, and how this is  related to the 405 kyr periodicity, might be verified with new ice core data of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> further back in time.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e7676">My analysis, based on an inverse approach which nudged simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C time series to reconstructions,  suggests that variations in the isotopic signatures of the geological sources (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of weathered carbonate rock or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of volcanic outgassed CO<sub>2</sub>) might, without any further changes in the carbon cycle, be sufficient to explain the signals  in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C related to the long eccentricity cycle during  most of the Plio-Pleistocene. Furthermore, my suggested solution connects this periodicity around 405 kyr in deep-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C with  the PGM-to-LGM offset in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub>, implying that both are caused by the same underlying processes. My analysis highlights the influence of obliquity on these changes in the <sup>13</sup>C cycle, which I interpret as Northern Hemisphere ice sheets being the ultimate cause for the necessary variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rock</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  or  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Studies show that both weathering and volcanic activity might, directly or indirectly, be influenced by land ice dynamics, giving independent support for my hypothesis. Taking the link to obliquity for granted, it is furthermore unlikely that the same mechanisms might have been responsible for the 405 kyr periodicity in marine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C found in earlier  climates of the Cenozoic, since there has not been  any substantial Northern Hemisphere ice sheet <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.142"/>. During these times, not only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, but also <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and potentially atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, contained cyclicity related to the long eccentricity, which is missing here for the Plio-Pleistocene; this requires other solutions to the problem. However, both my possible answers, either via carbonate weathering or via volcanism, seem similarly likely. So far, I have not yet found a criterion which makes one more likely than the other, and a mixture of both is probably the most realistic solution to the closure of the <sup>13</sup>C cycle on these slow timescales suggested here. However, as outlined in the Discussion, further investigations and proposed tests might favour one above the other. The dominance of obliquity in my solutions readily explains an improvement in simulated G-IG amplitudes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the 41 kyr world of the Plio-Pleistocene, but their reconstructed  sizes are not fully obtained. Thus, while  the influence of the isotopic signature of the geological sources might be  important for the  decoupling of climate from the carbon cycle, there is room for other (not yet detected) processes for a complete understanding of the Plio-Pleistocene <sup>13</sup>C cycle.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e7885">Data (simulation results) are available on PANGAEA: <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.972859" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.972859</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.143"/>.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e7894">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-1043-2025-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-1043-2025-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e7903">The author has declared that there are no competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e7909">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e7915">I thank Richard Zeebe for pointing out the work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.144"/> on the 200 kyr cycle to me, Peter U. Clark for some comments on earlier versions of the draft, and Florian Krauss and Jochen Schmitt for some insights on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> derived from ice cores. This publication contributed to Beyond EPICA, a project of the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Oldest Ice Core). This is Beyond EPICA publication number 44.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e7943">The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the Alfred-Wegener-Institut  Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e7949">This paper was edited by Antje Voelker and reviewed by Thomas Bauska and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Ahn et al.(2017)Ahn, Khider, Lisiecki, and Lawrence</label><mixed-citation>Ahn, S., Khider, D., Lisiecki, L. E., and Lawrence, C. E.: A probabilistic Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O using a profile hidden Markov model, Dynamics and Statistics of the Climate System, 2, dzx002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/climsys/dzx002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/climsys/dzx002</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Bachan et al.(2017)Bachan, Lau, Saltzman, Thomas, Kump, and Payne</label><mixed-citation>Bachan, A., Lau, K. V., Saltzman, M. R., Thomas, E., Kump, L. R., and Payne, J. L.: A model for the decrease in amplitude of carbon isotope excursions across the Phanerozoic, Am. J. Sci., 317, 641–676, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2475/06.2017.01" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2475/06.2017.01</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Barker et al.(2025)Barker, Lisiecki, Knorr, Nuber, and Tzedakis</label><mixed-citation>Barker, S., Lisiecki, L. E., Knorr, G., Nuber, S., and Tzedakis, P. C.: Distinct roles for precession, obliquity and eccentricity in Pleistocene 100 kyr glacial cycles, Science,  387, eadp3491, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adp3491" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.adp3491</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Barry et al.(2014)Barry, Hilton, Füri, Halldórsson, and Grönvold</label><mixed-citation>Barry, P., Hilton, D., Füri, E., Halldórsson, S., and Grönvold, K.: Carbon isotope and abundance systematics of Icelandic geothermal gases, fluids and subglacial basalts with implications for mantle plume-related CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 134, 74–99, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.02.038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2014.02.038</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Barry et al.(2020)Barry, Negrete-Aranda, Spelz, Seltzer, Bekaert, Virrueta, and Kulongoski</label><mixed-citation>Barry, P. H., Negrete-Aranda, R., Spelz, R. M., Seltzer, A. M., Bekaert, D. V., Virrueta, C., and Kulongoski, J. T.: Volatile sources, sinks and pathways: A helium carbon isotope study of Baja California fluids and gases, Chem. Geol., 550, 119722, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119722" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119722</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Batista Cruz et al.(2019)Batista Cruz, Rizzo, Grassa, Bernard Romero, González Fernández, Kretzschmar, and Gómez-Arias</label><mixed-citation>Batista Cruz, R. Y., Rizzo, A. L., Grassa, F., Bernard Romero, R., González Fernández, A., Kretzschmar, T. G., and Gómez-Arias, E.: Mantle Degassing Through Continental Crust Triggered by Active Faults: The Case of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 20, 1912–1936, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC007987" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GC007987</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Bereiter et al.(2015)Bereiter, Eggleston, Schmitt, Nehrbass-Ahles, Stocker, Fischer, Kipfstuhl, and Chappellaz</label><mixed-citation>Bereiter, B., Eggleston, S., Schmitt, J., Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Stocker, T. F., Fischer, H., Kipfstuhl, S., and Chappellaz, J.: Revision of the EPICA Dome C CO<sub>2</sub> record from 800 to 600 kyr before present, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 542–549, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061957" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL061957</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Berends et al.(2021)Berends, Köhler, Lourens, and van de Wal</label><mixed-citation>Berends, C. J., Köhler, P., Lourens, L. J., and van de Wal, R. S. W.: On the Cause of the Mid-Pleistocene Transition, Rev. Geophys., 59, e2020RG000727, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000727" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020RG000727</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Börker et al.(2020)Börker, Hartmann, Amann, Romero-Mujalli, Moosdorf, and Jenkins</label><mixed-citation>Börker, J., Hartmann, J., Amann, T., Romero-Mujalli, G., Moosdorf, N., and Jenkins, C.: Chemical weathering of loess during the Last Glacial Maximum, Mid-Holocene and today, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 21, e2020GC008922, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC008922" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GC008922</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Broecker and Peng(1987)</label><mixed-citation>Broecker, W. S. and Peng, T.-H.: The role of CaCO<sub>3</sub> compensation in the glacial to interglacial atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> change, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 1, 15–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GB001i001p00015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GB001i001p00015</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Burton et al.(2013)Burton, Sawyer, and Granieri</label><mixed-citation>Burton, M. R., Sawyer, G. M., and Granieri, D.: Deep Carbon Emissions from Volcanoes, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 75, 323–354, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2013.75.11" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2138/rmg.2013.75.11</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Cartapanis et al.(2016)Cartapanis, Bianchi, Jaccard, and Galbraith</label><mixed-citation>Cartapanis, O., Bianchi, D., Jaccard, S. L., and Galbraith, E. D.: Global pulses of organic carbon burial in deep-sea sediments during glacial maxima, Nat. Commun., 7, 10796, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10796" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms10796</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Cartapanis et al.(2018)Cartapanis, Galbraith, Bianchi, and Jaccard</label><mixed-citation>Cartapanis, O., Galbraith, E. D., Bianchi, D., and Jaccard, S. L.: Carbon burial in deep-sea sediment and implications for oceanic inventories of carbon and alkalinity over the last glacial cycle, Clim. Past, 14, 1819–1850, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1819-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-14-1819-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Cheng et al.(2016)Cheng, Edwards, Sinha, Spötl, Yi, Chen, Kelly, Kathayat, Wang, Li, Kong, Wang, Ning, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., Sinha, A., Spötl, C., Yi, L., Chen, S., Kelly, M., Kathayat, G., Wang, X., Li, X., Kong, X., Wang, Y., Ning, Y., and Zhang, H.: The Asian monsoon over the past 640,000 years and ice age terminations, Nature, 534, 640–646, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18591" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature18591</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Chiodini et al.(2011)Chiodini, Caliro, Aiuppa, Avino, Granieri, Moretti, and Parello</label><mixed-citation>Chiodini, G., Caliro, S., Aiuppa, A., Avino, R., Granieri, D., Moretti, R., and Parello, F.: First <sup>13</sup>C/<sup>12</sup>C isotopic characterisation of volcanic plume CO<sub>2</sub>, B. Volcanol., 73, 531–542, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-010-0423-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00445-010-0423-2</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Clark et al.(2024)Clark, Shakun, Rosenthal, Köhler, and Bartlein</label><mixed-citation>Clark, P. U., Shakun, J. D., Rosenthal, Y., Köhler, P., and Bartlein, P. J.: Global and regional temperature change over the past 4.5 million years, Science, 383, 884–890, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi1908" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.adi1908</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>De Vleeschouwer et al.(2020)De Vleeschouwer, Drury, Vahlenkamp, Rochholz, Liebrand, and Pälike</label><mixed-citation>De Vleeschouwer, D., Drury, A. J., Vahlenkamp, M., Rochholz, F., Liebrand, D., and Pälike, H.: High-latitude biomes and rock weathering mediate climate–carbon cycle feedbacks on eccentricity timescales, Nat. Commun., 11, 5013, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18733-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-020-18733-w</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Deines(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Deines, P.: The carbon isotope geochemistry of mantle xenoliths, Earth-Sci. Rev., 58, 247–278, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00064-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00064-8</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Eggleston et al.(2016)Eggleston, Schmitt, Bereiter, Schneider, and Fischer</label><mixed-citation>Eggleston, S., Schmitt, J., Bereiter, B., Schneider, R., and Fischer, H.: Evolution of the stable carbon isotope composition of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> over the last glacial cycle, Paleoceanography, 31, 434–452, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015PA002874" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015PA002874</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Faccenna et al.(2021)Faccenna, Becker, Holt, and Brun</label><mixed-citation>Faccenna, C., Becker, T. W., Holt, A. F., and Brun, J. P.: Mountain building, mantle convection, and supercontinents: Holmes (1931) revisited, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 564, 116905, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.116905" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2021.116905</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Fischer and Aiuppa(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Fischer, T. P. and Aiuppa, A.: AGU Centennial Grand Challenge: Volcanoes and Deep Carbon Global CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions From Subaerial Volcanism – Recent Progress and Future Challenges, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 21, e2019GC008690, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008690" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GC008690</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Hartmann and Moosdorf(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Hartmann, J. and Moosdorf, N.: Chemical weathering rates of silicate-dominated lithological classes and associated liberation rates of phosphorus on the Japanese Archipelago – Implications for global scale analysis, Chem. Geol., 287, 125–157, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.12.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.12.004</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Hartmann et al.(2009)Hartmann, Jansen, Dürr, Kempe, and Köhler</label><mixed-citation>Hartmann, J., Jansen, N., Dürr, H. H., Kempe, S., and Köhler, P.: Global CO<sub>2</sub>-consumption by chemical weathering: What is the contribution of highly active weathering regions?, Global  Planet. Change, 69, 185–194, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.07.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.07.007</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Hasenclever et al.(2017)Hasenclever, Knorr, Rüpke, Köhler, Morgan, Garofalo, Barker, Lohmann, and Hall</label><mixed-citation>Hasenclever, J., Knorr, G., Rüpke, L., Köhler, P., Morgan, J., Garofalo, K., Barker, S., Lohmann, G., and Hall, I.: Sea level fall during glaciation stabilized atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> by enhanced volcanic degassing, Nat. Commun., 8, 15867, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15867" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms15867</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Hilgen et al.(2020)Hilgen, Zeeden, and Laskar</label><mixed-citation>Hilgen, F., Zeeden, C., and Laskar, J.: Paleoclimate records reveal elusive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kyr eccentricity cycle for the first time, Global  Planet. Change, 194, 103296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103296</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Huang et al.(2021)Huang, Gao, Ma, Jones, Zeeden, Ibarra, Wu, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Huang, H., Gao, Y., Ma, C., Jones, M. M., Zeeden, C., Ibarra, D. E., Wu, H., and Wang, C.: Organic carbon burial is paced by a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 173-ka obliquity cycle in the middle to high latitudes, Sci. Adv., 7, eabf9489, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf9489" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.abf9489</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Huybers(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Huybers, P.: Glacial variability over the last two million years: an extended depth-derived agemodel, continuous obliquity pacing, and the Pleistocene progression, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 26, 37–55, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.07.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.07.013</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Huybers(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Huybers, P.: Combined obliquity and precession pacing of late Pleistocene deglaciations, Nature, 480, 229–232, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10626" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature10626</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Huybers and Langmuir(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Huybers, P. and Langmuir, C.: Feedback between deglaciation and volcanism, and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Earth  Planet. Sc. Lett., 286, 479–491, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.07.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2009.07.014</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Huybers and Langmuir(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Huybers, P. and Langmuir, C. H.: Delayed CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from mid-ocean ridge volcanism as a possible cause of late-Pleistocene glacial cycles, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 457, 238–249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.09.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2016.09.021</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Jeltsch-Thömmes and Joos(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Jeltsch-Thömmes, A. and Joos, F.: Carbon Cycle Responses to Changes in Weathering and the Long-Term Fate of Stable Carbon Isotopes, Paleoceanogr. Paleocl., 38, e2022PA004577, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022PA004577" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022PA004577</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Köhler(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Köhler, P.: Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration based on boron isotopes versus simulations of the global carbon cycle during the Plio-Pleistocene, Paleoceanogr. Paleocl., 38, e2022PA004439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022PA004439" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022PA004439</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Köhler(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Köhler, P.: Carbon cycle model simulations using BICYCLE-SE over the last 5 millions years with focus on the 405 kyr periodicities in <sup>13</sup>C, PANGAEA [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.972859" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.972859</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Köhler and Bintanja(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Köhler, P. and Bintanja, R.: The carbon cycle during the Mid Pleistocene Transition: the Southern Ocean Decoupling Hypothesis, Clim. Past, 4, 311–332, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-4-311-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-4-311-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Köhler and Mulitza(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Köhler, P. and Mulitza, S.: No detectable influence of the carbonate ion effect on changes in stable carbon isotope ratios (δ13C) of shallow dwelling planktic foraminifera over the past 160 kyr, Clim. Past, 20, 991–1015, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-991-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-20-991-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Köhler and Munhoven(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Köhler, P. and Munhoven, G.: Late Pleistocene carbon cycle revisited by considering solid Earth processes, Paleoceanogr. Paleocl., 35, e2020PA004020, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020PA004020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020PA004020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Köhler and van de Wal(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Köhler, P. and van de Wal, R. S. W.: Interglacials of the Quaternary defined by northern hemispheric land ice distribution outside of Greenland, Nat. Commun., 11, 5124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18897-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-020-18897-5</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Köhler et al.(2010)Köhler, Fischer, and Schmitt</label><mixed-citation>Köhler, P., Fischer, H., and Schmitt, J.: Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> and its relation to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<sub>2</sub> and deep ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C during the late Pleistocene, Paleoceanography, 25, PA1213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008PA001703" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008PA001703</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Köhler et al.(2024)Köhler, Skinner, and Adolphi</label><mixed-citation>Köhler, P., Skinner, L. C., and Adolphi, F.: Radiocarbon cycle revisited by considering the bipolar seesaw and benthic <sup>14</sup>C data, Earth  Planet. Sc. Lett., 640, 118801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2024.118801" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2024.118801</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Krauss et al.(2025)Krauss, Baggenstos, Schmitt, Tuzon, A., Mächler, Silva, Grimmer, Capron, Stocker, Bauska, and Fischer</label><mixed-citation>Krauss, F., Baggenstos, D., Schmitt, J., Tuzon, B., A., M. J., Mächler, L., Silva, L., Grimmer, M., Capron, E., Stocker, T. F., Bauska, T. K., and Fischer, F.: Multiple sources of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> activated by AMOC recovery at the onset of interglacial MIS 9, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.,   122, e2423057122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2423057122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2423057122</ext-link>,  2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Kutterolf et al.(2013)Kutterolf, Jegen, Mitrovica, Kwasnitschka, Freundt, and Huybers</label><mixed-citation>Kutterolf, S., Jegen, M., Mitrovica, J. X., Kwasnitschka, T., Freundt, A., and Huybers, P. J.: A detection of Milankovitch frequencies in global volcanic activity, Geology, 41, 227–230, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G33419.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G33419.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Kutterolf et al.(2019)Kutterolf, Schindlbeck, Jegen, Freundt, and Straub</label><mixed-citation>Kutterolf, S., Schindlbeck, J., Jegen, M., Freundt, A., and Straub, S.: Milankovitch frequencies in tephra records at volcanic arcs: The relation of  kyr-scale cyclic variations in volcanism to global climate changes, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 204, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.11.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.11.004</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Laskar et al.(2004)Laskar, Robutel, Joutel, Gastineau, Correia, and Levrard</label><mixed-citation>Laskar, J., Robutel, P., Joutel, F., Gastineau, M., Correia, A. C. M., and Levrard, B.: A long term numerical solution for the insolation quantities of the Earth, Astron. Astrophys., 428, 261–285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041335" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/0004-6361:20041335</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Lisiecki(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Lisiecki, L. E.: Atlantic overturning responses to obliquity and precession over the last 3 Myr, Paleoceanography, 29, 71–86, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013PA002505" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013PA002505</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Lisiecki and Raymo(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Lisiecki, L. E. and Raymo, M. E.: A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O records, Paleoceanography, 20, PA1003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004PA001071</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Ma et al.(2011)Ma, Tian, Li, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Ma, W., Tian, J., Li, Q., and Wang, P.: Simulation of long eccentricity (400 kyr) cycle in ocean carbon reservoir during Miocene Climate Optimum: Weathering and nutrient response to orbital change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L10701, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047680" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL047680</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Mason et al.(2017)Mason, Edmonds, and Turchyn</label><mixed-citation>Mason, E., Edmonds, M., and Turchyn, A. V.: Remobilization of crustal carbon may dominate volcanic arc emissions, Science, 357, 290–294, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan5049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aan5049</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Menking et al.(2022)Menking, Shackleton, Bauska, Buffen, Brook, Barker, Severinghaus, Dyonisius, and Petrenko</label><mixed-citation>Menking, J. A., Shackleton, S. A., Bauska, T. K., Buffen, A. M., Brook, E. J., Barker, S., Severinghaus, J. P., Dyonisius, M. N., and Petrenko, V. V.: Multiple carbon cycle mechanisms associated with the glaciation of Marine Isotope Stage 4, Nat. Commun., 13, 5443, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33166-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-022-33166-3</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Mix et al.(1995a)Mix, Le, and Shackleton</label><mixed-citation>Mix, A. C., Le, J., and Shackleton, N. J.: Benthic foraminiferal stable isotope stratigraphy of Site 846: 0-1.8 Ma, in: Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results Vol 138, edited by: Pisias, N. G., Mayer, L., Janecek, T., Palmer-Julson, A., and van Andel, T.,  College Station, Texas, USA, 839–854, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.138.160.1995" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2973/odp.proc.sr.138.160.1995</ext-link>, 1995a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Mix et al.(1995b)Mix, Pisias, Rugh, Wilson, Morey, and Hagelberg</label><mixed-citation>Mix, A. C., Pisias, N. G., Rugh, W., Wilson, J., Morey, A., and Hagelberg, T. K.: Benthic foraminiferal stable isotope record from site 849 (0-5 Ma): local and global climate changes, in: Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results Vol 138, edited by: Pisias, N. G., Mayer, L., Janecek, T., Palmer-Julson, A., and van Andel, T.,  College Station, Texas, USA, 371–412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.138.120.1995" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2973/odp.proc.sr.138.120.1995</ext-link>, 1995b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Moosdorf et al.(2011)Moosdorf, Hartmann, Lauerwald, Hagedorn, and Kempe</label><mixed-citation>Moosdorf, N., Hartmann, J., Lauerwald, R., Hagedorn, B., and Kempe, S.: Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> consumption by chemical weathering in North America, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 7829–7854, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.10.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2011.10.007</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Moussallam et al.(2024)Moussallam, Rose-Koga, Fischer, Georgeais, Lee, Birnbaum, Pfeffer, Barnie, and Regis</label><mixed-citation>Moussallam, Y., Rose-Koga, E. F., Fischer, T. P., Georgeais, G., Lee, H. J., Birnbaum, J., Pfeffer, M. A., Barnie, T., and Regis, E.: Kinetic Isotopic Degassing of CO<sub>2</sub> During the 2021 Fagradalsfjall Eruption and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C Signature of the Icelandic Mantle, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 25, e2024GC011997, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GC011997" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024GC011997</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Munhoven(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Munhoven, G.: Model of Early Diagenesis in the Upper Sediment with Adaptable complexity – MEDUSA (v. 2): a time-dependent biogeochemical sediment module for Earth system models, process analysis and teaching, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3603–3631, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3603-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-14-3603-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Paillard(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Paillard, D.: The Plio-Pleistocene climatic evolution as a consequence of orbital forcing on the carbon cycle, Clim. Past, 13, 1259–1267, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1259-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-13-1259-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Pälike et al.(2006)Pälike, Norris, Herrle, Wilson, Coxall, Lear, Shackleton, k. Tripati, and Wade</label><mixed-citation>Pälike, H., Norris, R. D., Herrle, J. O., Wilson, P. A., Coxall, H. K., Lear, C. H., Shackleton, N. J., k. Tripati, A., and Wade, B. S.: The heartbeat of the Oligocene climate system, Science, 314, 1894–1898, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133822" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1133822</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Pisias and Moore-Jr.(1981)</label><mixed-citation>Pisias, N. G. and Moore-Jr., T. C.: The evolution of Pleistocene climate: a time series approach, Earth  Planet. Sc. Lett., 52, 450–458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(81)90197-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0012-821X(81)90197-7</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Poore et al.(2006)Poore, Samworth, White, Jones, and McCave</label><mixed-citation>Poore, H. R., Samworth, R., White, N. J., Jones, S. M., and McCave, I. N.: Neogene overflow of Northern Component Water at the Greenland-Scotland Ridge, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 7, Q06010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC001085" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GC001085</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Prokoph et al.(2008)Prokoph, Shields, and Veizer</label><mixed-citation>Prokoph, A., Shields, G., and Veizer, J.: Compilation and time-series analysis of a marine carbonate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S database through Earth history, Earth-Sci. Rev., 87, 113–133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.12.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.12.003</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>R Core Team(2023)</label><mixed-citation>R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, <uri>https://www.R-project.org</uri> (last access: 26 September 2025), 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Rial et al.(2004)Rial, Pielke, Beniston, Claussen, Canadell, Cox, Held, de Noblet-Ducoudré, Prinn, Reynolds, and Salas</label><mixed-citation>Rial, J., Pielke, R. A., Beniston, M., Claussen, M., Canadell, J., Cox, P., Held, H., de Noblet-Ducoudré, N., Prinn, R., Reynolds, J. F., and Salas, J.: Nonlinearities, Feedbacks and Critical Thresholds within the Earth's Climate System, Clim. Change, 65, 11–38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000037493.89489.3f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/B:CLIM.0000037493.89489.3f</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Rial(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Rial, J. A.: Pacemaking the Ice Ages by frequency modulation of Earth's orbital eccentricity, Science, 285, 564–568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5427.564" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.285.5427.564</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Roesch and Schmidbauer(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Roesch, A. and Schmidbauer, H.: WaveletComp: Computational Wavelet Analysis, r package version 1.1,  <uri>https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=WaveletComp</uri> (last access: 26 September 2025), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Russon et al.(2010)Russon, Paillard, and Elliot</label><mixed-citation>Russon, T., Paillard, D., and Elliot, M.: Potential origins of 400-500 kyr periodicities in the ocean carbon cycle: A box model approach, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB2013, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003586" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GB003586</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Sano and Williams(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Sano, Y. and Williams, S. N.: Fluxes of mantle and subducted carbon along convergent plate boundaries, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2749–2752, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL02260" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96GL02260</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Schmittner et al.(2013)Schmittner, Gruber, Mix, Key, Tagliabue, and Westberry</label><mixed-citation>Schmittner, A., Gruber, N., Mix, A. C., Key, R. M., Tagliabue, A., and Westberry, T. K.: Biology and air–sea gas exchange controls on the distribution of carbon isotope ratios (δ<sup>13</sup>C) in the ocean, Biogeosciences, 10, 5793–5816, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5793-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-5793-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Schneider et al.(2013)Schneider, Schmitt, Köhler, Joos, and Fischer</label><mixed-citation>Schneider, R., Schmitt, J., Köhler, P., Joos, F., and Fischer, H.: A reconstruction of atmospheric carbon dioxide and its stable carbon isotopic composition from the penultimate glacial maximum to the last glacial inception, Clim. Past, 9, 2507–2523, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Shackleton and Opdyke(1976)</label><mixed-citation>Shackleton, N. J. and Opdyke, N. D.: Oxygen-isotope amd paleomagnetic stratigraphy of Pacific core V28-239: Late Pliocene to latest Pleistocene, in: Investigation of Late Quaternary Paleoceanography, and Paleoclimatology, edited by: Cune, R. M. and Hays, J. D.,  145,  Geological Society of America Memoir,  449–464, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/MEM145-p449" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/MEM145-p449</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Shackleton et al.(1995)Shackleton, Hall, and Pate</label><mixed-citation>Shackleton, N. J., Hall, M. A., and Pate, D.: Pliocene stable isotope stratigraphy of site 846, in: Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results Vol 138, edited by: Pisias, N. G., Mayer, L., Janecek, T., Palmer-Julson, A., and van Andel, T., College Station, Texas, USA, 337–355, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.138.117.1995" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2973/odp.proc.sr.138.117.1995</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Spero et al.(1997)Spero, Bijma, Lea, and Bemis</label><mixed-citation>Spero, H. J., Bijma, J., Lea, D. W., and Bemis, B. E.: Effect of seawater carbonate concentration on foraminiferal carbon and oxygen isotopes, Nature, 390, 497–500, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/37333" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/37333</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>The MathWorks Inc.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>The MathWorks Inc.: MATLAB Version: 9.14.0.2206163 (R2023a), Natick, Massachusetts, United States, <uri>https://www.mathworks.com</uri> (last access: 26 September 2025), 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Vance et al.(2009)Vance, Teagle, and Foster</label><mixed-citation>Vance, D., Teagle, D. A. H., and Foster, G. L.: Variable Quaternary chemical weathering fluxes and imbalances in marine geochemical budgets, Nature, 458, 493–496, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature07828</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>von Blanckenburg et al.(2015)von Blanckenburg, Bouchez, Ibarra, and Maher</label><mixed-citation>von Blanckenburg, F., Bouchez, J., Ibarra, D. E., and Maher, K.: Stable runoff and weathering fluxes into the oceans over Quaternary climate cycles, Nat. Geosci., 8, 538–542, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2452" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2452</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Wang et al.(2010)Wang, Tian, and Lourens</label><mixed-citation>Wang, P., Tian, J., and Lourens, L. J.: Obscuring of long eccentricity cyclicity in Pleistocene oceanic carbon isotope records, Earth  Planet. Sc. Lett., 290, 319–330, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.12.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2009.12.028</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Wang et al.(2014)Wang, Li, Tian, Jian, Liu, Li, and Ma</label><mixed-citation>Wang, P., Li, Q., Tian, J., Jian, Z., Liu, C., Li, L., and Ma, W.: Long-term cycles in the carbon reservoir of the Quaternary ocean: a perspective from the South China Sea, Natl. Sci. Rev., 1, 119–143, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwt028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/nsr/nwt028</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Westerhold et al.(2020)Westerhold, Marwan, Drury, Liebrand, Agnini, Anagnostou, Barnet, Bohaty, De Vleeschouwer, Florindo, Frederichs, Hodell, Holbourn, Kroon, Lauretano, Littler, Lourens, Lyle, Pälike, Röhl, Tian, Wilkens, Wilson, and Zachos</label><mixed-citation>Westerhold, T., Marwan, N., Drury, A. J., Liebrand, D., Agnini, C., Anagnostou, E., Barnet, J. S. K., Bohaty, S. M., De Vleeschouwer, D., Florindo, F., Frederichs, T., Hodell, D. A., Holbourn, A. E., Kroon, D., Lauretano, V., Littler, K., Lourens, L. J., Lyle, M., Pälike, H., Röhl, U., Tian, J., Wilkens, R. H., Wilson, P. A., and Zachos, J. C.: An astronomically dated record of Earth's climate and its predictability over the last 66 million years, Science, 369, 1383–1387, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba6853" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aba6853</ext-link>, 2020. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Whitmeyer and Karlstrom(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Whitmeyer, S. J. and Karlstrom, K. E.: Tectonic model for the Proterozoic growth of North America, Geosphere, 3, 220–259, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/GES00055.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/GES00055.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Willeit et al.(2019)Willeit, Ganopolski, Calov, and Brovkin</label><mixed-citation>Willeit, M., Ganopolski, A., Calov, R., and Brovkin, V.: Mid-Pleistocene transition in glacial cycles explained by declining CO<sub>2</sub> and regolith removal, Sci. Adv., 5, eaav7337, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav7337" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aav7337</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Ye et al.(2025)Ye, Munhoven, Köhler, Butzin, Hauck, Gürses, and Völker</label><mixed-citation>Ye, Y., Munhoven, G., Köhler, P., Butzin, M., Hauck, J., Gürses, Ö., and Völker, C.: FESOM2.1-REcoM3-MEDUSA2: an ocean–sea ice–biogeochemistry model coupled to a sediment model, Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 977–1000, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-977-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-18-977-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Yu et al.(2013)Yu, Anderson, Jin, Rae, Opdyke, and Eggins</label><mixed-citation>Yu, J., Anderson, R. F., Jin, Z., Rae, J. W., Opdyke, B. N., and Eggins, S. M.: Responses of the deep ocean carbonate system to carbon reorganization during the Last Glacial-interglacial cycle, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 76, 39–52, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.06.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.06.020</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Yun et al.(2023)Yun, Timmermann, Lee, Willeit, Ganopolski, and Jadhav</label><mixed-citation>Yun, K.-S., Timmermann, A., Lee, S.-S., Willeit, M., Ganopolski, A., and Jadhav, J.: A transient coupled general circulation model (CGCM) simulation of the past 3 million years, Clim. Past, 19, 1951–1974, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1951-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-19-1951-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Zeebe et al.(2017)Zeebe, Westerhold, Littler, and Zachos</label><mixed-citation>Zeebe, R. E., Westerhold, T., Littler, K., and Zachos, J. C.: Orbital forcing of the Paleocene and Eocene carbon cycle, Paleoceanography, 32, 440–465, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA003054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016PA003054</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Zhang et al.(2022)Zhang, Li, Xu, Li, Sun, Yue, Pan, Xian, Wei, and Cao</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R., Li, X., Xu, Y., Li, J., Sun, L., Yue, L., Pan, F., Xian, F., Wei, X., and Cao, Y.: The 173 kyr Obliquity Cycle Pacing the Asian Monsoon in the Eastern Chinese Loess Plateau From Late Miocene to Pliocene, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL097008, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL097008</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Closing the Plio-Pleistocene <sup>13</sup>C  cycle in the 405&thinsp;kyr periodicity by isotopic signatures of geological sources</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Ahn et al.(2017)Ahn, Khider, Lisiecki, and Lawrence</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ahn, S., Khider, D., Lisiecki, L. E., and Lawrence, C. E.: A probabilistic
Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of benthic <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O using a profile hidden Markov
model, Dynamics and Statistics of the Climate System, 2, dzx002,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/climsys/dzx002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/climsys/dzx002</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Bachan et al.(2017)Bachan, Lau, Saltzman, Thomas, Kump, and
Payne</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bachan, A., Lau, K. V., Saltzman, M. R., Thomas, E., Kump, L. R., and Payne,
J. L.: A model for the decrease in amplitude of carbon isotope excursions
across the Phanerozoic, Am. J. Sci., 317, 641–676,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2475/06.2017.01" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2475/06.2017.01</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Barker et al.(2025)Barker, Lisiecki, Knorr, Nuber, and
Tzedakis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barker, S., Lisiecki, L. E., Knorr, G., Nuber, S., and Tzedakis, P. C.:
Distinct roles for precession, obliquity and eccentricity in Pleistocene 100&thinsp;kyr glacial cycles, Science,  387, eadp3491, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adp3491" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adp3491</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Barry et al.(2014)Barry, Hilton, Füri, Halldórsson, and
Grönvold</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barry, P., Hilton, D., Füri, E., Halldórsson, S., and Grönvold, K.:
Carbon isotope and abundance systematics of Icelandic geothermal gases,
fluids and subglacial basalts with implications for mantle plume-related
CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 134, 74–99,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.02.038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.02.038</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Barry et al.(2020)Barry, Negrete-Aranda, Spelz, Seltzer, Bekaert,
Virrueta, and Kulongoski</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barry, P. H., Negrete-Aranda, R., Spelz, R. M., Seltzer, A. M., Bekaert, D. V.,
Virrueta, C., and Kulongoski, J. T.: Volatile sources, sinks and pathways: A helium carbon isotope study of Baja California fluids and gases, Chem.
Geol., 550, 119722, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119722" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119722</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Batista Cruz et al.(2019)Batista Cruz, Rizzo, Grassa, Bernard Romero,
González Fernández, Kretzschmar, and
Gómez-Arias</label><mixed-citation>
      
Batista Cruz, R. Y., Rizzo, A. L., Grassa, F., Bernard Romero, R.,
González Fernández, A., Kretzschmar, T. G., and Gómez-Arias, E.:
Mantle Degassing Through Continental Crust Triggered by Active Faults: The
Case of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico, Geochem. Geophy.
Geosy., 20, 1912–1936, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC007987" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC007987</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bereiter et al.(2015)Bereiter, Eggleston, Schmitt, Nehrbass-Ahles,
Stocker, Fischer, Kipfstuhl, and Chappellaz</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bereiter, B., Eggleston, S., Schmitt, J., Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Stocker, T. F.,
Fischer, H., Kipfstuhl, S., and Chappellaz, J.: Revision of the EPICA Dome C
CO<sub>2</sub> record from 800 to 600&thinsp;kyr before present, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 42, 542–549, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061957" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061957</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Berends et al.(2021)Berends, Köhler, Lourens, and van de
Wal</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berends, C. J., Köhler, P., Lourens, L. J., and van de Wal, R. S. W.: On
the Cause of the Mid-Pleistocene Transition, Rev. Geophys., 59,
e2020RG000727, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000727" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000727</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Börker et al.(2020)Börker, Hartmann, Amann, Romero-Mujalli,
Moosdorf, and Jenkins</label><mixed-citation>
      
Börker, J., Hartmann, J., Amann, T., Romero-Mujalli, G., Moosdorf, N., and
Jenkins, C.: Chemical weathering of loess during the Last Glacial Maximum,
Mid-Holocene and today, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 21,
e2020GC008922, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC008922" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC008922</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Broecker and Peng(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Broecker, W. S. and Peng, T.-H.: The role of CaCO<sub>3</sub> compensation in the
glacial to interglacial atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> change, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 1, 15–29, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GB001i001p00015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GB001i001p00015</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Burton et al.(2013)Burton, Sawyer, and Granieri</label><mixed-citation>
      
Burton, M. R., Sawyer, G. M., and Granieri, D.: Deep Carbon Emissions from
Volcanoes, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 75, 323–354,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2013.75.11" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2013.75.11</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Cartapanis et al.(2016)Cartapanis, Bianchi, Jaccard, and
Galbraith</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cartapanis, O., Bianchi, D., Jaccard, S. L., and Galbraith, E. D.: Global
pulses of organic carbon burial in deep-sea sediments during glacial maxima,
Nat. Commun., 7, 10796, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10796" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10796</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Cartapanis et al.(2018)Cartapanis, Galbraith, Bianchi, and
Jaccard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cartapanis, O., Galbraith, E. D., Bianchi, D., and Jaccard, S. L.: Carbon burial in deep-sea sediment and implications for oceanic inventories of carbon and alkalinity over the last glacial cycle, Clim. Past, 14, 1819–1850, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1819-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1819-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Cheng et al.(2016)Cheng, Edwards, Sinha, Spötl, Yi, Chen, Kelly,
Kathayat, Wang, Li, Kong, Wang, Ning, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., Sinha, A., Spötl, C., Yi, L., Chen, S., Kelly,
M., Kathayat, G., Wang, X., Li, X., Kong, X., Wang, Y., Ning, Y., and Zhang,
H.: The Asian monsoon over the past 640,000 years and ice age terminations,
Nature, 534, 640–646, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18591" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18591</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Chiodini et al.(2011)Chiodini, Caliro, Aiuppa, Avino, Granieri,
Moretti, and Parello</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chiodini, G., Caliro, S., Aiuppa, A., Avino, R., Granieri, D., Moretti, R., and
Parello, F.: First <sup>13</sup>C/<sup>12</sup>C isotopic characterisation of volcanic
plume CO<sub>2</sub>, B. Volcanol., 73, 531–542,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-010-0423-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-010-0423-2</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Clark et al.(2024)Clark, Shakun, Rosenthal, Köhler, and
Bartlein</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clark, P. U., Shakun, J. D., Rosenthal, Y., Köhler, P., and Bartlein,
P. J.: Global and regional temperature change over the past 4.5 million
years, Science, 383, 884–890, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi1908" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi1908</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>De Vleeschouwer et al.(2020)De Vleeschouwer, Drury, Vahlenkamp,
Rochholz, Liebrand, and Pälike</label><mixed-citation>
      
De Vleeschouwer, D., Drury, A. J., Vahlenkamp, M., Rochholz, F., Liebrand, D.,
and Pälike, H.: High-latitude biomes and rock weathering mediate
climate–carbon cycle feedbacks on eccentricity timescales, Nat.
Commun., 11, 5013, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18733-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18733-w</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Deines(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Deines, P.: The carbon isotope geochemistry of mantle xenoliths, Earth-Sci.
Rev., 58, 247–278, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00064-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00064-8</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Eggleston et al.(2016)Eggleston, Schmitt, Bereiter, Schneider, and
Fischer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eggleston, S., Schmitt, J., Bereiter, B., Schneider, R., and Fischer, H.:
Evolution of the stable carbon isotope composition of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> over
the last glacial cycle, Paleoceanography, 31, 434–452,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015PA002874" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015PA002874</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Faccenna et al.(2021)Faccenna, Becker, Holt, and
Brun</label><mixed-citation>
      
Faccenna, C., Becker, T. W., Holt, A. F., and Brun, J. P.: Mountain building,
mantle convection, and supercontinents: Holmes (1931) revisited, Earth
Planet. Sc. Lett., 564, 116905, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.116905" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.116905</a>,
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Fischer and Aiuppa(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fischer, T. P. and Aiuppa, A.: AGU Centennial Grand Challenge: Volcanoes and
Deep Carbon Global CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions From Subaerial Volcanism – Recent
Progress and Future Challenges, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 21,
e2019GC008690, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008690" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008690</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Hartmann and Moosdorf(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hartmann, J. and Moosdorf, N.: Chemical weathering rates of silicate-dominated
lithological classes and associated liberation rates of phosphorus on the
Japanese Archipelago – Implications for global scale analysis, Chem.
Geol., 287, 125–157, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.12.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.12.004</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Hartmann et al.(2009)Hartmann, Jansen, Dürr, Kempe, and
Köhler</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hartmann, J., Jansen, N., Dürr, H. H., Kempe, S., and Köhler, P.:
Global CO<sub>2</sub>-consumption by chemical weathering: What is the contribution of
highly active weathering regions?, Global  Planet. Change, 69, 185–194,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.07.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.07.007</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Hasenclever et al.(2017)Hasenclever, Knorr, Rüpke, Köhler,
Morgan, Garofalo, Barker, Lohmann, and Hall</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hasenclever, J., Knorr, G., Rüpke, L., Köhler, P., Morgan, J.,
Garofalo, K., Barker, S., Lohmann, G., and Hall, I.: Sea level fall during
glaciation stabilized atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> by enhanced volcanic degassing,
Nat. Commun., 8, 15867, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15867" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15867</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Hilgen et al.(2020)Hilgen, Zeeden, and Laskar</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hilgen, F., Zeeden, C., and Laskar, J.: Paleoclimate records reveal elusive
 ∼ 200&thinsp;kyr eccentricity cycle for the first time, Global  Planet. Change,
194, 103296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103296" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103296</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Huang et al.(2021)Huang, Gao, Ma, Jones, Zeeden, Ibarra, Wu, and
Wang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, H., Gao, Y., Ma, C., Jones, M. M., Zeeden, C., Ibarra, D. E., Wu, H.,
and Wang, C.: Organic carbon burial is paced by a  ∼ &thinsp;173-ka obliquity
cycle in the middle to high latitudes, Sci. Adv., 7, eabf9489,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf9489" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf9489</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Huybers(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huybers, P.: Glacial variability over the last two million years: an extended
depth-derived agemodel, continuous obliquity pacing, and the Pleistocene
progression, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 26, 37–55,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.07.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.07.013</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Huybers(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huybers, P.: Combined obliquity and precession pacing of late Pleistocene
deglaciations, Nature, 480, 229–232, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10626" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10626</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Huybers and Langmuir(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huybers, P. and Langmuir, C.: Feedback between deglaciation and volcanism, and
atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Earth  Planet. Sc. Lett., 286, 479–491,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.07.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.07.014</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Huybers and Langmuir(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huybers, P. and Langmuir, C. H.: Delayed CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from mid-ocean ridge
volcanism as a possible cause of late-Pleistocene glacial cycles, Earth
Planet. Sc. Lett., 457, 238–249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.09.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.09.021</a>,
2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Jeltsch-Thömmes and Joos(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jeltsch-Thömmes, A. and Joos, F.: Carbon Cycle Responses to Changes in
Weathering and the Long-Term Fate of Stable Carbon Isotopes, Paleoceanogr. Paleocl., 38, e2022PA004577,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022PA004577" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022PA004577</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Köhler(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Köhler, P.: Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration based on boron isotopes versus
simulations of the global carbon cycle during the Plio-Pleistocene,
Paleoceanogr. Paleocl., 38, e2022PA004439,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022PA004439" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022PA004439</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Köhler(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Köhler, P.: Carbon cycle model simulations using BICYCLE-SE over the last
5 millions years with focus on the 405&thinsp;kyr periodicities in <sup>13</sup>C,
PANGAEA [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.972859" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.972859</a>,
2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Köhler and Bintanja(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Köhler, P. and Bintanja, R.: The carbon cycle during the Mid Pleistocene Transition: the Southern Ocean Decoupling Hypothesis, Clim. Past, 4, 311–332, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-4-311-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-4-311-2008</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Köhler and Mulitza(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Köhler, P. and Mulitza, S.: No detectable influence of the carbonate ion effect on changes in stable carbon isotope ratios (δ13C) of shallow dwelling planktic foraminifera over the past 160 kyr, Clim. Past, 20, 991–1015, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-991-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-991-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Köhler and Munhoven(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Köhler, P. and Munhoven, G.: Late Pleistocene carbon cycle revisited by
considering solid Earth processes, Paleoceanogr. Paleocl., 35,
e2020PA004020, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020PA004020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020PA004020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Köhler and van de Wal(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Köhler, P. and van de Wal, R. S. W.: Interglacials of the Quaternary
defined by northern hemispheric land ice distribution outside of Greenland,
Nat. Commun., 11, 5124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18897-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18897-5</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Köhler et al.(2010)Köhler, Fischer, and
Schmitt</label><mixed-citation>
      
Köhler, P., Fischer, H., and Schmitt, J.: Atmospheric <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>CO<sub>2</sub>
and its relation to <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> and deep ocean <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C during the late
Pleistocene, Paleoceanography, 25, PA1213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008PA001703" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008PA001703</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Köhler et al.(2024)Köhler, Skinner, and
Adolphi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Köhler, P., Skinner, L. C., and Adolphi, F.: Radiocarbon cycle revisited by
considering the bipolar seesaw and benthic <sup>14</sup>C data, Earth  Planet.
Sc. Lett., 640, 118801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2024.118801" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2024.118801</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Krauss et al.(2025)Krauss, Baggenstos, Schmitt, Tuzon, A.,
Mächler, Silva, Grimmer, Capron, Stocker, Bauska, and
Fischer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Krauss, F., Baggenstos, D., Schmitt, J., Tuzon, B., A., M. J., Mächler, L.,
Silva, L., Grimmer, M., Capron, E., Stocker, T. F., Bauska, T. K., and
Fischer, F.: Multiple sources of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> activated by AMOC
recovery at the onset of interglacial MIS 9, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci.,   122, e2423057122, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2423057122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2423057122</a>,  2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Kutterolf et al.(2013)Kutterolf, Jegen, Mitrovica, Kwasnitschka,
Freundt, and Huybers</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kutterolf, S., Jegen, M., Mitrovica, J. X., Kwasnitschka, T., Freundt, A., and
Huybers, P. J.: A detection of Milankovitch frequencies in global volcanic
activity, Geology, 41, 227–230, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G33419.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G33419.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Kutterolf et al.(2019)Kutterolf, Schindlbeck, Jegen, Freundt, and
Straub</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kutterolf, S., Schindlbeck, J., Jegen, M., Freundt, A., and Straub, S.:
Milankovitch frequencies in tephra records at volcanic arcs: The relation of
&thinsp;kyr-scale cyclic variations in volcanism to global climate changes,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 204, 1–16,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.11.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.11.004</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Laskar et al.(2004)Laskar, Robutel, Joutel, Gastineau, Correia, and
Levrard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laskar, J., Robutel, P., Joutel, F., Gastineau, M., Correia, A. C. M., and
Levrard, B.: A long term numerical solution for the insolation quantities of
the Earth, Astron. Astrophys., 428, 261–285,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041335" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041335</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Lisiecki(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lisiecki, L. E.: Atlantic overturning responses to obliquity and precession
over the last 3&thinsp;Myr, Paleoceanography, 29, 71–86,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013PA002505" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013PA002505</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Lisiecki and Raymo(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lisiecki, L. E. and Raymo, M. E.: A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally
distributed benthic <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O records, Paleoceanography, 20, PA1003,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001071</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Ma et al.(2011)Ma, Tian, Li, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ma, W., Tian, J., Li, Q., and Wang, P.: Simulation of long eccentricity
(400&thinsp;kyr) cycle in ocean carbon reservoir during Miocene Climate Optimum:
Weathering and nutrient response to orbital change, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 38, L10701, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047680" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047680</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Mason et al.(2017)Mason, Edmonds, and Turchyn</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mason, E., Edmonds, M., and Turchyn, A. V.: Remobilization of crustal carbon
may dominate volcanic arc emissions, Science, 357, 290–294,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan5049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan5049</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Menking et al.(2022)Menking, Shackleton, Bauska, Buffen, Brook,
Barker, Severinghaus, Dyonisius, and Petrenko</label><mixed-citation>
      
Menking, J. A., Shackleton, S. A., Bauska, T. K., Buffen, A. M., Brook, E. J.,
Barker, S., Severinghaus, J. P., Dyonisius, M. N., and Petrenko, V. V.:
Multiple carbon cycle mechanisms associated with the glaciation of Marine
Isotope Stage 4, Nat. Commun., 13, 5443,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33166-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33166-3</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Mix et al.(1995a)Mix, Le, and
Shackleton</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mix, A. C., Le, J., and Shackleton, N. J.: Benthic foraminiferal stable isotope
stratigraphy of Site 846: 0-1.8 Ma, in: Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling
Program, Scientific Results Vol 138, edited by: Pisias, N. G., Mayer, L.,
Janecek, T., Palmer-Julson, A., and van Andel, T.,  College
Station, Texas, USA, 839–854, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.138.160.1995" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.138.160.1995</a>,
1995a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Mix et al.(1995b)Mix, Pisias, Rugh, Wilson, Morey, and
Hagelberg</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mix, A. C., Pisias, N. G., Rugh, W., Wilson, J., Morey, A., and Hagelberg,
T. K.: Benthic foraminiferal stable isotope record from site 849 (0-5 Ma):
local and global climate changes, in: Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling
Program, Scientific Results Vol 138, edited by: Pisias, N. G., Mayer, L.,
Janecek, T., Palmer-Julson, A., and van Andel, T.,  College
Station, Texas, USA, 371–412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.138.120.1995" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.138.120.1995</a>,
1995b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Moosdorf et al.(2011)Moosdorf, Hartmann, Lauerwald, Hagedorn, and
Kempe</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moosdorf, N., Hartmann, J., Lauerwald, R., Hagedorn, B., and Kempe, S.:
Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> consumption by chemical weathering in North America,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 7829–7854,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.10.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.10.007</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Moussallam et al.(2024)Moussallam, Rose-Koga, Fischer, Georgeais,
Lee, Birnbaum, Pfeffer, Barnie, and Regis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moussallam, Y., Rose-Koga, E. F., Fischer, T. P., Georgeais, G., Lee, H. J.,
Birnbaum, J., Pfeffer, M. A., Barnie, T., and Regis, E.: Kinetic Isotopic
Degassing of CO<sub>2</sub> During the 2021 Fagradalsfjall Eruption and the
<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C Signature of the Icelandic Mantle, Geochem. Geophy.
Geosy., 25, e2024GC011997, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GC011997" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GC011997</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Munhoven(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Munhoven, G.: Model of Early Diagenesis in the Upper Sediment with Adaptable complexity – MEDUSA (v. 2): a time-dependent biogeochemical sediment module for Earth system models, process analysis and teaching, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3603–3631, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3603-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3603-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Paillard(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paillard, D.: The Plio-Pleistocene climatic evolution as a consequence of orbital forcing on the carbon cycle, Clim. Past, 13, 1259–1267, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1259-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1259-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Pälike et al.(2006)Pälike, Norris, Herrle, Wilson, Coxall,
Lear, Shackleton, k. Tripati, and Wade</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pälike, H., Norris, R. D., Herrle, J. O., Wilson, P. A., Coxall, H. K.,
Lear, C. H., Shackleton, N. J., k. Tripati, A., and Wade, B. S.: The
heartbeat of the Oligocene climate system, Science, 314, 1894–1898,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133822" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133822</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Pisias and Moore-Jr.(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pisias, N. G. and Moore-Jr., T. C.: The evolution of Pleistocene climate: a
time series approach, Earth  Planet. Sc. Lett., 52, 450–458,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(81)90197-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(81)90197-7</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Poore et al.(2006)Poore, Samworth, White, Jones, and
McCave</label><mixed-citation>
      
Poore, H. R., Samworth, R., White, N. J., Jones, S. M., and McCave, I. N.:
Neogene overflow of Northern Component Water at the Greenland-Scotland Ridge,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 7, Q06010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC001085" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC001085</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Prokoph et al.(2008)Prokoph, Shields, and Veizer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prokoph, A., Shields, G., and Veizer, J.: Compilation and time-series analysis
of a marine carbonate <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O, <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C, <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr and
<i>δ</i><sup>34</sup>S database through Earth history, Earth-Sci. Rev., 87, 113–133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.12.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.12.003</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>R Core Team(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria,
<a href="https://www.R-project.org" target="_blank"/> (last access: 26 September 2025), 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Rial et al.(2004)Rial, Pielke, Beniston, Claussen, Canadell, Cox,
Held, de Noblet-Ducoudré, Prinn, Reynolds, and Salas</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rial, J., Pielke, R. A., Beniston, M., Claussen, M., Canadell, J., Cox, P.,
Held, H., de Noblet-Ducoudré, N., Prinn, R., Reynolds, J. F., and Salas,
J.: Nonlinearities, Feedbacks and Critical Thresholds within the Earth's
Climate System, Clim. Change, 65, 11–38,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000037493.89489.3f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000037493.89489.3f</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Rial(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rial, J. A.: Pacemaking the Ice Ages by frequency modulation of Earth's orbital
eccentricity, Science, 285, 564–568, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5427.564" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5427.564</a>,
1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Roesch and Schmidbauer(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Roesch, A. and Schmidbauer, H.: WaveletComp: Computational Wavelet Analysis,
r package
version 1.1,  <a href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=WaveletComp" target="_blank"/> (last access: 26 September 2025), 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Russon et al.(2010)Russon, Paillard, and Elliot</label><mixed-citation>
      
Russon, T., Paillard, D., and Elliot, M.: Potential origins of 400-500&thinsp;kyr
periodicities in the ocean carbon cycle: A box model approach, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB2013, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003586" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003586</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Sano and Williams(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sano, Y. and Williams, S. N.: Fluxes of mantle and subducted carbon along
convergent plate boundaries, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2749–2752,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL02260" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL02260</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Schmittner et al.(2013)Schmittner, Gruber, Mix, Key, Tagliabue, and
Westberry</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schmittner, A., Gruber, N., Mix, A. C., Key, R. M., Tagliabue, A., and Westberry, T. K.: Biology and air–sea gas exchange controls on the distribution of carbon isotope ratios (δ<sup>13</sup>C) in the ocean, Biogeosciences, 10, 5793–5816, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5793-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5793-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Schneider et al.(2013)Schneider, Schmitt, Köhler, Joos, and
Fischer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schneider, R., Schmitt, J., Köhler, P., Joos, F., and Fischer, H.: A reconstruction of atmospheric carbon dioxide and its stable carbon isotopic composition from the penultimate glacial maximum to the last glacial inception, Clim. Past, 9, 2507–2523, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Shackleton and Opdyke(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shackleton, N. J. and Opdyke, N. D.: Oxygen-isotope amd paleomagnetic
stratigraphy of Pacific core V28-239: Late Pliocene to latest Pleistocene,
in: Investigation of Late Quaternary Paleoceanography, and Paleoclimatology,
edited by: Cune, R. M. and Hays, J. D.,  145,  Geological Society of
America Memoir,  449–464, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/MEM145-p449" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/MEM145-p449</a>, 1976.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Shackleton et al.(1995)Shackleton, Hall, and
Pate</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shackleton, N. J., Hall, M. A., and Pate, D.: Pliocene stable isotope
stratigraphy of site 846, in: Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program,
Scientific Results Vol 138, edited by: Pisias, N. G., Mayer, L., Janecek, T.,
Palmer-Julson, A., and van Andel, T., College Station, Texas,
USA, 337–355, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.138.117.1995" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.138.117.1995</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Spero et al.(1997)Spero, Bijma, Lea, and Bemis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spero, H. J., Bijma, J., Lea, D. W., and Bemis, B. E.: Effect of seawater
carbonate concentration on foraminiferal carbon and oxygen isotopes, Nature,
390, 497–500, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/37333" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/37333</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>The MathWorks Inc.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
The MathWorks Inc.: MATLAB Version: 9.14.0.2206163 (R2023a), Natick,
Massachusetts, United States, <a href="https://www.mathworks.com" target="_blank"/> (last access: 26 September 2025),
2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Vance et al.(2009)Vance, Teagle, and Foster</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vance, D., Teagle, D. A. H., and Foster, G. L.: Variable Quaternary chemical
weathering fluxes and imbalances in marine geochemical budgets, Nature, 458,
493–496, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07828</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>von Blanckenburg et al.(2015)von Blanckenburg, Bouchez, Ibarra, and
Maher</label><mixed-citation>
      
von Blanckenburg, F., Bouchez, J., Ibarra, D. E., and Maher, K.: Stable runoff
and weathering fluxes into the oceans over Quaternary climate cycles, Nat.
Geosci., 8, 538–542, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2452" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2452</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Wang et al.(2010)Wang, Tian, and Lourens</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, P., Tian, J., and Lourens, L. J.: Obscuring of long eccentricity
cyclicity in Pleistocene oceanic carbon isotope records, Earth  Planet.
Sc. Lett., 290, 319–330, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.12.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.12.028</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Wang et al.(2014)Wang, Li, Tian, Jian, Liu, Li, and Ma</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, P., Li, Q., Tian, J., Jian, Z., Liu, C., Li, L., and Ma, W.: Long-term
cycles in the carbon reservoir of the Quaternary ocean: a perspective from
the South China Sea, Natl. Sci. Rev., 1, 119–143,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwt028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwt028</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Westerhold et al.(2020)Westerhold, Marwan, Drury, Liebrand, Agnini,
Anagnostou, Barnet, Bohaty, De Vleeschouwer, Florindo, Frederichs, Hodell,
Holbourn, Kroon, Lauretano, Littler, Lourens, Lyle, Pälike, Röhl,
Tian, Wilkens, Wilson, and Zachos</label><mixed-citation>
      
Westerhold, T., Marwan, N., Drury, A. J., Liebrand, D., Agnini, C., Anagnostou,
E., Barnet, J. S. K., Bohaty, S. M., De Vleeschouwer, D., Florindo, F.,
Frederichs, T., Hodell, D. A., Holbourn, A. E., Kroon, D., Lauretano, V.,
Littler, K., Lourens, L. J., Lyle, M., Pälike, H., Röhl, U., Tian,
J., Wilkens, R. H., Wilson, P. A., and Zachos, J. C.: An astronomically dated
record of Earth's climate and its predictability over the
last 66 million years, Science, 369, 1383–1387,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba6853" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba6853</a>, 2020.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Whitmeyer and Karlstrom(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Whitmeyer, S. J. and Karlstrom, K. E.: Tectonic model for the Proterozoic
growth of North America, Geosphere, 3, 220–259, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/GES00055.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/GES00055.1</a>,
2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Willeit et al.(2019)Willeit, Ganopolski, Calov, and
Brovkin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Willeit, M., Ganopolski, A., Calov, R., and Brovkin, V.: Mid-Pleistocene
transition in glacial cycles explained by declining CO<sub>2</sub> and regolith
removal, Sci. Adv., 5, eaav7337, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav7337" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav7337</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Ye et al.(2025)Ye, Munhoven, Köhler, Butzin, Hauck, Gürses,
and Völker</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ye, Y., Munhoven, G., Köhler, P., Butzin, M., Hauck, J., Gürses, Ö., and Völker, C.: FESOM2.1-REcoM3-MEDUSA2: an ocean–sea ice–biogeochemistry model coupled to a sediment model, Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 977–1000, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-977-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-977-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Yu et al.(2013)Yu, Anderson, Jin, Rae, Opdyke, and
Eggins</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, J., Anderson, R. F., Jin, Z., Rae, J. W., Opdyke, B. N., and Eggins, S. M.:
Responses of the deep ocean carbonate system to carbon reorganization during
the Last Glacial-interglacial cycle, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 76, 39–52,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.06.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.06.020</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Yun et al.(2023)Yun, Timmermann, Lee, Willeit, Ganopolski, and
Jadhav</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yun, K.-S., Timmermann, A., Lee, S.-S., Willeit, M., Ganopolski, A., and Jadhav, J.: A transient coupled general circulation model (CGCM) simulation of the past 3 million years, Clim. Past, 19, 1951–1974, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1951-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1951-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Zeebe et al.(2017)Zeebe, Westerhold, Littler, and
Zachos</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zeebe, R. E., Westerhold, T., Littler, K., and Zachos, J. C.: Orbital forcing
of the Paleocene and Eocene carbon cycle, Paleoceanography, 32, 440–465,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA003054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA003054</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Zhang et al.(2022)Zhang, Li, Xu, Li, Sun, Yue, Pan, Xian, Wei, and
Cao</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, R., Li, X., Xu, Y., Li, J., Sun, L., Yue, L., Pan, F., Xian, F., Wei,
X., and Cao, Y.: The 173&thinsp;kyr Obliquity Cycle Pacing the Asian Monsoon in the
Eastern Chinese Loess Plateau From Late Miocene to Pliocene, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL097008, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097008</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
