<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">CP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Climate of the Past</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">CP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Clim. Past</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1814-9332</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/cp-19-681-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>Indian Ocean variability changes in the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project</article-title><alt-title>Indian Ocean variability in PMIP4</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Indian Ocean variability in PMIP4}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C. Brierley et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Brierley</surname><given-names>Chris</given-names></name>
          <email>c.brierley@ucl.ac.uk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9195-6731</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Thirumalai</surname><given-names>Kaustubh</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7875-4182</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Grindrod</surname><given-names>Edward</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Barnsley</surname><given-names>Jonathan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Dept. Geography, University College London, London, United Kingdom</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Dept. Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Chris Brierley (c.brierley@ucl.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>27</day><month>March</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>681</fpage><lpage>701</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>14</day><month>October</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>October</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17</day><month>January</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day><month>January</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 Chris Brierley et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/681/2023/cp-19-681-2023.html">This article is available from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/681/2023/cp-19-681-2023.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/681/2023/cp-19-681-2023.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/681/2023/cp-19-681-2023.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e114">The Indian Ocean exhibits multiple modes of interannual climate variability, whose future behaviour is uncertain. Recent analysis of glacial climates has uncovered an additional El Niño-like equatorial mode in the Indian Ocean, which could also emerge in future warm states. Here we explore changes in the tropical Indian Ocean simulated by the Paleoclimate Model Intercomparison Project (PMIP4). These simulations are performed by an ensemble of models contributing to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 and over four coordinated experiments: three past periods – the mid-Holocene (6000 years ago), the Last Glacial Maximum (21 000 years ago), the last interglacial (127 000 years ago) – and an idealized forcing scenario to examine the impact of greenhouse forcing. The two interglacial experiments are used to characterize the role of orbital variations in the seasonal cycle, whilst the other pair focus on responses to large changes in global temperature.</p>

      <p id="d1e117">The Indian Ocean Basin Mode (IOBM) is damped in both the mid-Holocene and last interglacial, with the amount related to the damping of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation in the Pacific. No coherent changes in the strength of the IOBM are seen with global temperature changes; neither are changes in the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) nor the Niño-like mode. Under orbital forcing, the IOD robustly weakens during the mid-Holocene experiment, with only minor reductions in amplitude during the last interglacial. Orbital changes do impact the SST pattern of the Indian Ocean Dipole, with the cold pole reaching up to the Equator and extending along it. Induced changes in the regional seasonality are hypothesized to be an important control on changes in the Indian Ocean variability.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Natural Environment Research Council</funding-source>
<award-id>NE/S009736/1</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Directorate for Geosciences</funding-source>
<award-id>1903482</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e129">The Indian Ocean (IO) is Earth's third largest ocean and unique amongst the tropical oceans as the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx92" id="paren.1"/> and Maritime Continent prevent equatorial easterly winds and eastern upwelling that characterize both the tropical Pacific and Atlantic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.2"/>. Observations show the thermocline is almost flat between African and Indonesia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.3"/> due to the weak mean equatorial winds regulated by the monsoon climate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="paren.4"/>. The Asian landmass inhibits meridional heat transport to the midlatitudes, prevents ventilation of the thermocline, and helps drive the Indian monsoon.</p>
      <p id="d1e144">The Indian Ocean harbours many modes of interannual variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx97" id="paren.5"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, two of which were assessed by the IPCC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.6"/>: the Indian Ocean Dipole <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx91" id="paren.7"><named-content content-type="pre">IOD;</named-content></xref> and the Indian Ocean Basin Mode <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.8"><named-content content-type="pre">IOBM;</named-content></xref>. These modes have global teleconnections but particularly pronounced effects around the densely populated IO rim, as demonstrated by the 2019 extreme IOD <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85 bib1.bibx87" id="paren.9"/>. Since 1950, the Indian Ocean basin has experienced rapid sea surface temperature (SST) warming, attributed to anthropogenic emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.10"/>. The changing mean state will substantially modify the processes controlling the modes of variability.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<?pagebreak page682?><sec id="Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <label>1.1</label><title>Indian Ocean Dipole</title>
      <p id="d1e180">The primary Indian Ocean mode is the IOD, discovered following a strong positive event in 1997 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx91" id="paren.11"/>. The magnitude of IOD events is commonly measured using the Dipole Mode Index (DMI; see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/> for definition). The majority of IOD events are triggered by the El Niño–Southern Oscillation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.12"><named-content content-type="pre">ENSO;</named-content></xref>. During an El Niño, the atmospheric convection in the Walker circulation shifts eastward, forcing anomalous subsidence over the Maritime Continent <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.13"/> and easterly wind anomalies along the equatorial IO <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.14"/>, triggering a positive IOD event. Alternatively, some IOD events are initiated without any Pacific influence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx89" id="paren.15"/>. Once SST anomalies form, regardless of their origin, several positive feedbacks sustain and enhance the IOD <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.16"/>. As the zonal SST gradient initially decreases, the seasonal easterly winds strengthen, shoaling the thermocline and resulting in cold upwelling, which reinforces the initial cold anomaly <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.17"/>. Anomalous Ekman pumping warms the western Indian Ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.18"/>. IOD events are characteristically phased-locked to begin developing around June, peak in boreal fall, and rapidly decay following the reversal of the trade winds in November <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.19"/>. The IOD has a periodicity of 3–5 years <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx61" id="paren.20"/> with positive events being more intense than negative events <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.21"/>. This skewness is mainly attributed to asymmetry in the thermocline–SST feedback, which overpowers increased damping from the SST–cloud–radiation feedback <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.22"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e225">Projected future changes in the Indian Ocean's mean state will have significant impacts on the IOD by modulating the efficiency of the feedbacks that control its evolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx88" id="paren.23"/>. Shoaling of the equatorial thermocline near Indonesia will strengthen the thermocline–SST feedback, encouraging stronger IOD events <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.24"/>. On the other hand, increased atmospheric static stability will weaken the atmospheric components of the Bjerknes feedback <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.25"/>. The changing feedbacks will modify the characteristics of the IOD, reducing skewness <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.26"/> and shifting events towards boreal summer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102" id="paren.27"/>. Although the frequency of positive IOD events has been rising, the consensus on the future frequency and strength of IOD is weak <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.28"/>. The overall frequency of IOD events is not projected to increase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.29"/>, yet proxies suggest past positive IOD-like mean states have experienced more frequent IODs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.30"/>. Some studies find no increase in IOD magnitude <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.31"/> under future warming scenarios, whilst others have <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.32"/>. The projected frequency of extreme positive IOD events increases substantially as the zonal SST gradient and winds weaken <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.33"/>. However, an opposite response may occur for moderate positive events as tropospheric warming limits Ekman pumping <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.34"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e266">Investigations of past interannual variations in the Indian Ocean have facilitated insights into the nature of coupling between altered mean states and climate variability in this basin. Proxy reconstructions reveal elevated IOD variability during periods when the zonal SST gradient was reduced relative to present-day conditions, accompanied by enhanced mean cooling in the eastern Indian Ocean (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="altparen.35"/> for a review). Such periods of intensified IOD activity alongside eastern cooling have been uncovered during the last millennium <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.36"/>, the mid-Holocene period <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.37"/>, and the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.38"/>. Various lines of proxy evidence reinforce the finding that the Indian Ocean is capable of harbouring larger interannual climate variations than observed today <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.39"/>. Coeval records from the Pacific point to mean-state-dependent feedbacks maintaining pan-tropical IOD and ENSO interactions over different palaeoclimate periods. For example, strong IOD activity recorded over the last millennium appears to be tightly linked to strengthened ENSO variability as well <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.40"/>. During the mid-Holocene and the LGM however, when global climate and forcing were drastically altered relative to the last millennium, reconstructions point to stronger interannual variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.41"/> and weakened ENSO-related variability in the Pacific <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.42"/>. Though the ENSO–IOD relationship may depend on the palaeoclimate mean state and boundary conditions therein, proxy records support a tight link between the zonal SST gradient and IOD intensity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.43"/>, with robust evidence for variations larger than those observed in the instrumental period.</p>
      <p id="d1e297">There have been several previous studies looking at the Indian Ocean Dipole using palaeoclimate simulations by a single model. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.44"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.45"/> use the FOAM model and find a slight weakening in IOD amplitude at the mid-Holocene and little change at the LGM. Meanwhile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.46"/> find a stronger IOD in the mid-Holocene in MIROC5. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.47"/> showed that changes in IOD amplitude do not scale global mean temperature changes across a multi-model ensemble including palaeoclimate simulations. Combined, though, the literature does suggest IOD changes with changes in the seasonal cycle; something supported by the emerging, independent research of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.48"/>, who look at the mechanisms behind this response.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <label>1.2</label><title>Indian Ocean Basin Mode</title>
      <p id="d1e324">The Indian Ocean Basin Mode (IOBM) is a basin-wide anomaly that is the leading mode of interannual Indian Ocean SST variability. IOBM events often follow IOD events,<?pagebreak page683?> developing in boreal winter and peaking in the following spring <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="paren.49"/>. This seasonality implies a connection with the ENSO mature phase in boreal winter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="paren.50"/>, although modelling suggests IOBM can occur without ENSO <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.51"/>. Nonetheless, ENSO is the dominant forcing mechanism for the IOBM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96" id="paren.52"/> as an El Niño induces anomalous Walker circulation over the equatorial Indo-Pacific <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.53"/>. This modulates surface winds, reducing evaporation and increasing downward short-wave radiation to warm the Indian Ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="paren.54"/>. Diffusion of tropospheric temperature anomalies from the eastern Pacific contributes significantly <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.55"/>. The IOBM–ENSO relationship displays interdecadal variation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.56"/> with strong ENSO elevating the relationship as the thermocline shoals in the south-west Indian Ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.57"/>. Most Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) 5 models capture the key features of the IOBM whilst overestimating its amplitude <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.58"/>, due to winter rainfall and thermocline biases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.59"/>. Initial investigations of the CMIP6 ensemble indicate underestimated SST variability results from inaccurate latent heat fluxes and wind-driven ocean processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.60"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e365">IOBM future projections must consider the response and uncertainty of ENSO simulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.61"/>. Under warming, the tropical Pacific moves towards an El Niño-like mean state <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="paren.62"/> and a consensus is developing that ENSO-induced precipitation variability will intensify, canonical El Niño will strengthen, and both El Niño Modoki and extreme ENSO events will increase in frequency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx76" id="paren.63"/>. These changes will exacerbate the future global impacts of ENSO <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.64"/> and should drive a stronger IOBM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="paren.65"/>. Indeed, many modelling studies suggest an enhanced IOBM and capacitor effect under global warming <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.66"/>. This has been found alongside ENSO activity that is reduced <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="paren.67"/> or unchanged <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.68"/>. The increased IOBM response results from strengthened air–sea interactions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="paren.69"/> and a greater tropospheric temperature response <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.70"/>. A recent study projects a weaker IOBM response in early summer suggesting a decreased capacitor effect, yet the IOBM feedback on ENSO transition is strengthened <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.71"/>. The IOBM is also projected to have an increasing influence over the East Asian summer climate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.72"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e406">Few studies have focused on reconstructing past IOBM variations. Complexities arise in assessing past IOBM behaviour due to the potentially confounding influence of the IOD, where warming in the east of the basin associated with negative IOD events could be conflated with anomalous IOBM warming <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.73"/>. Moreover, the lack of available interannually resolved records from the western Indian Ocean presents an additional challenge in isolating past IOBM intensity.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Models</title>
      <p id="d1e428">Climate models, with their basis in geophysical fluid dynamics, are our best source of information about the future changes in climate. The vehicle that coordinates and collates simulations of future climate is the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.74"/>. The aspect of CMIP that looks at simulations of past is the Paleoclimate Model Intercomparison Project (PMIP). Here, we combine simulations from both PMIP phase 4 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.75"><named-content content-type="pre">PMIP4; </named-content></xref> and phase 3 (PMIP3) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.76"/>. This acts to increase the ensemble size <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.77"/> and the two phases have shown to be statistically indistinguishable <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.78"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e448">Models must have completed one or more palaeoclimate simulations to be included here and to have provided monthly surface temperature and precipitation for at least 30 years for both this simulation and the preindustrial control (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>). The resulting 34 models are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, with a total of 34 426 simulated years analysed. Further information about the CMIP6 models is available in on the PMIP4 website (<uri>https://pmip4.lsce.ipsl.fr/doku.php/database:participants</uri>, last access: 7 July 2022), whilst details of the CMIP5 models can be found in Table 9.A.1 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.79"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e464">The ensembles analysed in this work. For each of the models, we provide the amount of simulation output analysed for each experiment (in years). Not all models performed all experiments. The “genre” shows whether a model produced future simulations as part of either CMIP5 or CMIP6 or only performed the palaeoclimate experiments (PMIP3 or PMIP4). Also shown is the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS, in  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) from either  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx95" id="text.80"/> or the article introducing the model.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Genre</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ECS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">piControl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">midHolocene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">lig127k</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">lgm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">abrupt4xCO2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ACCESS-ESM1-5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">900</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AWI-ESM-1-1-LR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BCC-CSM1-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CCSM4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1051</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">301</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">101</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">700</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">700</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">149</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CNRM-CM5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">850</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CNRM-CM6-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">301</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">COSMOS-ASO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PMIP3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">400</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">600</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CSIRO-Mk3-6-0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">149</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CSIRO-Mk3L-1-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PMIP3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EC-Earth3-LR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">201</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">201</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FGOALS-f3-L</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">561</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FGOALS-g2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">700</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">680</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FGOALS-g3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FGOALS-s2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">501</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GISS-E2-1-G</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">851</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GISS-E2-R</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HadGEM2-CC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">240</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HadGEM2-ES</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">336</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">101</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HadGEM3-GC31-LL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">INM-CM4-8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">531</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IPSL-CM5A-LR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IPSL-CM6A-LR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">550</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">550</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIROC-ES2L</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIROC-ESM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">630</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">149</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MPI-ESM-P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1156</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MPI-ESM1-2-LR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MRI-CGCM3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MRI-ESM2-0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">701</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NESM3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NorESM1-F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PMIP4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NorESM2-LM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">391</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UofT-CCSM-4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PMIP4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e1472">This research uses simulations run under five different experiments defined under either the CMIP or PMIP protocols. All models have performed a preindustrial control (henceforth piControl) which approximates to constant 1850 CE boundary conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.81"/>. This simulation acts as a baseline from which changes are computed under all the other experiments. The piControl simulations vary in length but are a minimum of 100 years long (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). The “abrupt4xCO2” experiment is another of the required deck of CMIP simulations and is an idealized forcing experiment where the carbon dioxide concentrations are instantaneously quadrupled and then the model is left to respond to them. These simulations are useful in estimating a model's climate sensitivity  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx95" id="paren.82"/>, and the resulting values are shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. Here we use the average of years 101–150 after the forcing change to provide an idea of climate changes in response to increasing greenhouse gases. This experiment and a segment of it are selected over other options as they are (a) unchanged between CMIP5 and CMIP6, (b) available for a large number of models, and (c) closer to equilibrium than the alternative “1pctCO2” experiment. Efforts are made to account for any transience in this segment through linear detrending (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e1487">The “midHolocene” experiment is the most simulated of all PMIP experiments, having both been part of PMIP since<?pagebreak page684?> the beginning and not requiring changes in the land–sea mask. The midHolocene experiment aims to replicate the conditions of 6000 years ago. The primary change in the simulation is alteration in the orbital configuration, although a small reduction in greenhouses gases is incorporated in the most recent simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.83"/>. We consider simulations from both PMIP3 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.84"/> and PMIP4 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.85"/> together, as their forcings and boundary conditions are statistically indistinguishable.</p>
      <p id="d1e1499">The “lig127k” experiment represents some of the warming conditions seen during the last interglacial, focused at 127 000 years ago <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.86"/>. The experiment is included in PMIP4 for the first time <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.87"/> and has been completed by 14 modelling groups <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.88"/>. It is predominantly an orbitally forced experiment, with accompanying changes in greenhouse gases: the approximate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m of sea level rise during the last interglacial are not incorporated into the boundary conditions. The magnitude of the orbital forcing is substantially larger than seen during the midHolocene, with the anomaly in NH summer insolation being twice as strong and occurring for longer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.89"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1524">The world was much colder at the time of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), by a similar order of magnitude to the warming seen in projections <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.90"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. As such, it has long been seen as an important test for climate models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.91"/> and has featured in PMIP since its inception. The “lgm” experimental protocol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.92"/> requires the imposition of large ice sheets, associated changes in the land–sea mask, and reductions in greenhouse gases. This can be a challenging experiment to deploy for a climate model, and therefore a smaller<?pagebreak page685?> number of modelling groups have completed it than either of the interglacial experiments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.93"/>. Only a handful of groups have posted output on the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) at the time of writing, so we additionally incorporate PMIP3 simulations to increase the ensemble size. Although the PMIP4 models show some differences in circulation and encompass a greater ensemble spread in temperatures, we note that <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.94"/> conclude that they “are not fundamentally different from the PMIP3-CMIP5 results”.</p>
      <p id="d1e1548">This research looks at coupled phenomena, and so self-consistency between all observed variables is an important factor. Therefore, we adopt a reanalysis product instead of multiple observational datasets. For this work, the 20th-Century Reanalysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.95"/> is used, although we do not expect our main conclusions in the model evaluation to be sensitive to this choice. Version 3 of the 20th-Century Reanalysis extends back to 1836 and uses HadISST <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.96"/> to provide its bottom boundary conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.97"/>. Initial analysis using the shorter second version did expose a sensitivity in the IOD rainfall teleconnection over India, presumably relating to the ENSO–IOD relationship in the earlier period. Evaluation of the models is performed through comparison of  the 20th-Century Reanalysis to the piControl simulations. It would be preferable to use the historical simulations instead of piControl. However, not all models have a historical simulation available, and previous work suggests the difference in biases are not substantial <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.98"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Analysis and definitions</title>
      <p id="d1e1571">The analysis undertaken in this research follows the workflow described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="text.99"/>. This involves the creation of a curated replica of the relevant simulation output available on the ESGF. Then calendar adjustments are made to re-aggregate the monthly output from a present-day calendar to those representing 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  of the orbit for the past climate experiments using the PaleoCalAdjust software <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.100"/>. A modified version of the Climate Variability Diagnostics Package <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.101"><named-content content-type="pre">CVDP;</named-content></xref> is run on an individual simulation to calculate multiple pertinent time series and spatial fields. Please see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="text.102"/> for further details and instructions on performing such analysis yourself.</p>
      <p id="d1e1597">All of the modes of climate variability explored in this research are defined through the use of area-averaged sea surface temperature anomalies (or more strictly “skin temperature”, which is used as an alternative in CVDP). All anomalies are computed with respect to a climatology calculated over the full simulation length and additionally have a linear trend removed in case the simulations are not equilibrated. The same process is undertaken in the abrupt4xCO2 experiment, except only years 101–150 are considered. ENSO is monitored using the Niño3.4 region (5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 120–170<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="altparen.103"/>). The Dipole Mode Index is used to define the IOD <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="paren.104"/>. It is the difference between the area average of 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 50–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and 0–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 90–110<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E. The Indian Ocean Basin Mode is defined using variations in the Tropical Indian Ocean time series (averaged over 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 40–110<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="altparen.105"/>). These modes adopt the definitions used by the IPCC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.106"/>, who demonstrate that they are equivalent to definitions based on empirical orthogonal functions.</p>
      <p id="d1e1713">The El Niño-like mode of variability proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.107"/> is best defined using wind fields <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.108"/>. However, those fields are not as universally available in the ESGF archive, especially for PMIP experiments. Instead, we analyse the area-averaged SST anomalies of the Eastern Equatorial Indian Ocean (EEIO) over the region 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 70–95<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.109"/>, the impact of which will be discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1755">We present spatial patterns associated with the Indian Ocean Dipole, which are computed via regression. Detrended monthly anomalies of surface temperature and precipitation are computed at every grid point across the globe. These anomalies are then regressed against the Dipole Mode Index (defined as described above). The resulting patterns are therefore expressed as the local change in temperature or precipitation seen under a positive IOD event when the Dipole Mode Index is 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.110"><named-content content-type="pre">the level of warming reached during the extreme event in 2019;</named-content></xref>. Both the IOD spatial patterns and the mean climate changes presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/> show the multi-model ensemble average. Each model's changes are computed on their own native grid and then interpolated onto a regular 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  grid before averaging across the ensemble. Stippling in figures is used to indicate where the ensemble is “not consistent” in its direction of change; this is computed as being less than two-thirds of the ensemble array on the sign of the change.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Comparison with observations</title>
      <p id="d1e1799">It is necessary to assess the appropriateness of the PMIP ensemble against observations prior to looking at the response in experiments. This is performed through the inspection of the patterns of surface climate variables over the region of interest (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). Here we use a single atmospheric reanalysis dataset <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.111"><named-content content-type="pre">20th-Century Reanalysis;</named-content><named-content content-type="post">Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/></named-content></xref> driven by the prescribed SSTs from the HadISST dataset <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.112"/>. The annual pattern of SST consists of a pool of warm water extending from Indonesia in the east to nearly all the way across the basin (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a). This extent is relatively well captured by the ensemble mean (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b), although it overestimates the amount of cooler water in the Arabian Sea and near Madagascar. The annual mean precipitation pattern reflects the seasonal march of the Intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ), with an intense oceanic band at 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and a more diffuse terrestrial pattern in<?pagebreak page686?> the Northern Hemisphere (NH) especially focused over orography (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c). The ensemble mean simulated pattern shares most of these features but is much smoother (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>d).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1835">Comparison between the observed climate and the PMIP ensemble. The left-hand side is taken from the 20th-Century Reanalysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.113"/>, with the ensemble mean of the preindustrial control simulations on the right. The rows present the annual mean sea surface temperatures <bold>(a, b)</bold>, annual mean precipitation <bold>(c, d)</bold>, IOD pattern computed by regressing the monthly SST anomalies against the DMI (<bold>e, f</bold>; Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>), and the rainfall anomalies associated with IOD variations <bold>(g, h)</bold>. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/681/2023/cp-19-681-2023-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1862">The Indian Ocean Dipole is characterized by a region of cooling off Java and Sumatra counterbalanced by a warming in the western half of the basin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="paren.114"><named-content content-type="post">Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>e</named-content></xref>. This pattern in SST is fundamentally replicated by the ensemble (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>f). The models show more cooling around the Indonesian Archipelago, as well as a less extensive patch of warm SSTs in the western half of the basin, especially south of the Equator. The rainfall pattern of the IOD is strongest over the interior of the IO, with the direction controlled by the underlying SST pattern (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>g). This aspect of the rainfall pattern is well simulated by the ensemble (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>h). Both models and observations capture a reduced rainfall over India.</p>
      <p id="d1e1879">The IOD is positively correlated with the Indian summer monsoon rainfall <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.115"/>, although the strength of that teleconnection seems to be changing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.116"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.117"/> find that CMIP5 models (roughly half the current ensemble) have too strong a summer rainfall teleconnection. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="text.118"/> show that the quality of the IOD simulation improved in CMIP6. However, this literature-based description of the IOD's teleconnection to rainfall over India is of a different sign to the response shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>g and h. This discrepancy results from the analysis approach used here combined with model mean state biases. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.119"/> demonstrate that the sign of the Indian summer monsoon IOD teleconnection is dependent on the analysis technique used (for compositing versus correlation). The IOD teleconnection shown here is computed by regressing detrended monthly anomalies (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>) for all seasons; this already acts to convolve IOD impacts on the summer and winter monsoons. More importantly, the regression approach we adopt can be overridden by an ENSO response which is correlated to the DMI time series <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.120"/>. Additionally, the models underestimate the annual rainfall over central India on average (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c, d) because they do not capture the full strength of the summer rainfall, which further acts to reduce the summer contribution to the teleconnection. A separate investigation of the role of the Indian Ocean Dipole on the Indian monsoon rainfall using an alternate analysis approach would be required to fully isolate and understand the present and past response. It is sufficient to note here that the models do replicate the large-scale pattern emerging from the observations, but there remains doubt about the IOD teleconnections over the Indian subcontinent. Therefore, this analysis does not draw conclusions about the impact of past interannual variability changes on the Indian monsoon.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Changes in mean climate</title>
      <?pagebreak page687?><p id="d1e1915">The tropical climate in the experiments analysed here primarily responds to one of two forcings: changes in the orbital configuration or in the concentrations of greenhouse gases. These different forcings result in two distinct climate responses, as demonstrated in the simulations. First we present and discuss the midHolocene and lig127k experiments together and then move onto a description of the lgm and abrupt4xCO2 experiments. We note this latter comparison is not perfect because the high-latitude ice sheets do impact the tropics through bathymetry changes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.121"/> and atmospheric teleconnections <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx83" id="paren.122"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1926">Ensemble mean change in surface temperatures. The columns show the annual mean <bold>(a, d, g, j)</bold>, DJF <bold>(b, e, h, k)</bold>, and JJA <bold>(c, f, i, l)</bold>. The rows show the ensemble mean difference from the piControl simulations for the midHolocene <bold>(a, b, c)</bold>, lig127k <bold>(d, e, f)</bold>, LGM <bold>(g, h, i)</bold>, and abrupt4xCO2 simulations <bold>(j, k, l)</bold>. The ensemble mean of the respective piControl simulations is overlaid as black contours (shown for every 2 mm d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> until 12 mm d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Stippling indicates where the ensemble is not consistent in the direction of change.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/681/2023/cp-19-681-2023-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1981">Precession leads to changes in the day of the year at which the Earth is closest to the Sun (the perihelion). At present, this occurs during NH winter, yet this was nearer the autumn equinox during the mid-Holocene and occurred near the summer solstice at 127 ka <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.123"/>. This results in a different distribution of the incoming solar radiation throughout the year. The eccentricity of the orbit was also larger during the last interglacial, exacerbating these changes in the lig127k experiment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.124"/>. Intuitively, more sunlight in summer and less in winter will lead to a stronger seasonal temperature range in the Northern Hemisphere, especially outside of the tropics. This is visible in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b, c for the midHolocene simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.125"/> in Asia north of the Himalayas and even more so in lig127k <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.126"><named-content content-type="pre">Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>e, f;</named-content></xref>. Over most of the region, the seasonal temperature changes “cancel” themselves out, leading to minimal changes in the annual mean (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a, d). This is especially true over the ocean, where its high effective heat capacity acts to damp seasonal variations.</p>
      <p id="d1e2006">There is an obvious exception to the simple narrative of precession-modulated temperature response outlined above, with summer cooling over land stretching from the Indian subcontinent over Arabia and into Ethiopia (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c, f). This can be thought of as being related to a poleward shift in the summer ITCZ driven by the stronger interhemispheric temperature gradients <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx94" id="paren.127"/>, mainly through dynamic processes rather than thermodynamic ones <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.128"/>. The impact of this process is greatest over West Africa and is underestimated in model simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.129"/>, and both experiments fall under separate instances of an African humid period <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="paren.130"/>. Summer rainfall increases over East Africa are clearly visible (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c, f), which extend into the Arabian peninsula. This increased rainfall comes with an increase in convection and cloud cover, leading to a reduction in incoming solar radiation at the surface as well as latent heat flux changes associated with the precipitation. The situation is different over India, however. There is no increase in total rainfall in the Indian summer monsoon <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.131"><named-content content-type="pre">Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>,</named-content></xref> but rather a redistribution of it, so that more falls in the foothills of the Himalayas instead of on the central Indo-Gangetic Plain. A similar style of dipole response occurs over the Western Ghats. The band of anomalous summer drying extends east from central India over South-East Asia to the Philippines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.132"/>. Meanwhile the Indonesian Archipelago is wetter in JJA and drier in DJF, as is northern Australia.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2038">Ensemble mean change in precipitation. The columns show the annual mean <bold>(a, d, g, j)</bold>, DJF <bold>(b, e, h, k)</bold>, and JJA <bold>(c, f, i, l)</bold>. The rows show the ensemble mean difference from the piControl simulations for the midHolocene <bold>(a, b, c)</bold>, lig127k <bold>(d, e, f)</bold>, LGM <bold>(g, h, i)</bold>, and abrupt4xCO2 simulations <bold>(j, k, l)</bold>. Stippling indicates where the ensemble is not consistent in the direction of change.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/681/2023/cp-19-681-2023-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2069">Over the Indian Ocean itself, there is an orbitally driven increase in DJF rainfall that is strongest near the African coast (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b, e). This accompanies, and could be driving, a slight cooling in DJF in the region (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b, e). In JJA, the orbital forcing results in a west–east dipole of rainfall changes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c, f), which is reminiscent of the IOD teleconnection (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>h). This is accompanied by some low-amplitude, annual mean SST changes that project onto the IOD (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>h), although these are only visible in the lig127k ensemble (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>d). The weaker orbital forcing in the midHolocene experiment means that the changes are swamped by the impact of the reduced greenhouse gases in the PMIP4 experiment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.133"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2088">The Last Glacial Maximum was a substantially colder period, with global mean cooling of around 5–7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.134"/>. The lower greenhouse gas concentrations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.135"/> played a dominant role in determining the tropical climate changes, although impacts on climate variability from the Laurentide ice sheet were felt across the globe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.136"/>. The tropical Indian Ocean itself cools by 2–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the PMIP ensemble (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>g), roughly in line with estimates from palaeodata assimilation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.137"/>. Conversely a quadrupling of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to an increase in temperatures by 4–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>j). Both responses show little seasonal variation and greater amplitudes of temperature change over the land (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). The two patterns mirror each other to first order, except for a stronger response over the Indonesian Archipelago associated with the exposure of the Sunda Shelf <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.138"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2150">The colder climate of the lgm experiment leads to drier conditions across the region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.139"><named-content content-type="pre">Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>g;</named-content></xref>, whilst future warming leads to increased rainfall across most of the basin (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>j). There is greater seasonal variation in the rainfall changes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>k, l) than the temperature response (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>k, l), reflecting the stronger seasonal cycle in rainfall. There is an interesting non-linearity in the JJA rainfall changes between the LGM and idealized warming to the south-east of Sumatra and Java (cf. Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>g and j) in that both high- and low-CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> experiments demonstrate a drying in the region. This non-linearity is centred on the eastern region of the Dipole Mode Index (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>) and therefore could be expected to influence the response of the Indian Ocean Dipole. This arises from the exposure of the Sunda Shelf <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.140"/>, which has already been shown to have an influence on the ensuing variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.141"/>. Even though the underlying drivers of climatic forcing for the lgm and abrupt4xco2 experiments differ, they trigger a similar mean zonal response in the tropical Indian Ocean that has been suggested to modulate interannual variability across the basin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.142"/>.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page688?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Changes in variability</title>
      <p id="d1e2197">Having established that the experiments lead to consistent changes in the mean Indian Ocean climate, we next explore whether they also alter its variability. We start by looking at the IOD, whose pattern is relatively well captured by the models (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>). The amplitude of the IOD can be characterized by the standard deviation of the monthly Dipole Mode Index (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>). The standard deviation of the (detrended) Dipole Mode Index in the HadISST dataset, used by the 20th-Century Reanalysis, is 0.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. There is a spread in the amplitude of the IOD in the piControl simulations that ranges from 0.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in INM-CM4-8 to 0.75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in CSIRO-Mk3-6-0, with an ensemble median that is close to the observed value (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a). The precise composition of models that have undertaken each experiment varies, leading to subtly different control ensembles. Those models that have performed an LGM experiment are generally ambiguous about its impact on the IOD amplitude: 7 of the 13 models show a slight decrease, with the other 6 showing an increase. MIROC-ESM shows the largest change (an increase of 63 %), although its successor model has a very small reduction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). The median value also remains the same (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a), leading us to conclude to that the last glacial conditions did not impact the magnitude of the Indian Ocean Dipole. A similar situation occurs for the lig127k experiment: equivocal simulated changes leading to minimal changes in the IOD amplitude distribution. Despite having a weaker orbital forcing, the midHolocene sees a reduction in the standard deviation of the DMI of roughly 10 %. The individual models within the ensemble still show some disagreement about the signal, with only 20 out of 29 models simulating a<?pagebreak page690?> reduction of some magnitude (CSIRO-Mk3-6-0 is an outlier, whose already high IOD amplitude increases by a further 35 %). There is a robust decrease in IOD amplitude in the abrupt4xCO2 experiments (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>; taken between years 101-150 with a linear trend removed), with 18 of the 24 simulations showing a reduction of some magnitude. This result was noted in PMIP3 by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.143"/> and fits with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.144"/>, who anticipate a reduction in amplitude should the mean state changes resemble a positive IOD, conditions that are found in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>l, although this will be explored in more in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>. The abrupt4xCO2 experiments are still not equilibrated, and there may be some impacts of slow feedbacks that have not yet fully emerged <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.145"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2273">Amplitude changes in modes of Indian Ocean variability. <bold>(a)</bold> The amplitude of the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) is measured by the standard deviation of the Dipole Mode Index (DMI; the difference in area-averaged SST anomalies between the western and south-eastern Indian Ocean). <bold>(b)</bold> The amplitude of the Indian Ocean Basin Mode (IOBM) is measured by the standard deviation of the tropical Indian Ocean Index. See Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/> for definitions of the areas over which the SST anomalies are computed. The values computed using the 20th-Century Reanalysis are shown as black dashed lines. The distributions are computed using a kernel density estimation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.146"/> from the simulation values shown, as are the quartiles shown by the short dashed and dotted lines. The horizontal location of the dots has no meaning and has been chosen to allow all simulations to be seen. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/681/2023/cp-19-681-2023-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2293">Our approach to define the IOD pattern through linear regression (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>) allows spatial changes to be considered separately from changes in amplitude. The orbital forcing experiments both see an expansion of the IOD cold pole eastwards along the Equator (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, c), which is stronger in the lig127k than the midHolocene. This spills out over the Equator into the Northern Hemisphere, especially into the Bay of Bengal. In the lig127k experiment, this acts to make Bay of Bengal SSTs cool during a positive IOD event in every model. This is a region where many models already have trouble replicating the warming signal seen in observations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>e, f), but even the five models that successfully capture this in the piControl simulations switch to cold SSTs in the lig127k  (not shown). This is accompanied by a constriction of the western SST pole of the IOD pattern back towards the East African coast (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c). This results in the boundary between the dipolar phases of the IOD occurring to the west of Sri Lanka, rather than to its east, in the majority of models. The shifts in the midHolocene experiments are not as strong but are of a similar nature (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, c).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2309">Ensemble mean change in SST and rainfall patterns of the Indian Ocean Dipole. Each row represents the ensemble mean difference from the piControl simulations and a different experiment, with the midHolocene changes in SST <bold>(a)</bold> and rainfall <bold>(b)</bold>, the lig127k changes in SST <bold>(c)</bold> and rainfall <bold>(d)</bold>, the LGM changes in SST <bold>(e)</bold> and rainfall <bold>(f)</bold>, and the abrupt4xCO2 changes in SST <bold>(g)</bold> and rainfall <bold>(h)</bold> patterns. The patterns within each simulation are first computed through regressing monthly anomalies onto the Dipole Mode Index; then each model's changes in those patterns are averaged across the ensemble (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>). Stippling indicates where the ensemble is not consistent in the direction of change (i.e. less than two-thirds agree on it). The overlaid contours show the ensemble mean pattern in the piControl simulations, with dashed contours indicating negative numbers. As the models contributing to each experiment change, so does the precise pattern of piControl patterns. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=230.467323pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/681/2023/cp-19-681-2023-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2345">The expansion of the SST cold pole along the Equator during the orbital simulations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, c) is accompanied by a reduction in rainfall that extends further westward during a positive IOD (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b, d). There is also a slight weakening of the strong drying response in the south-east Indian Ocean (east of Java) and an intensification of the wet conditions off the East African coast, which do not extend into the continent. Both the lig127k and midHolocene ensembles suggest that the IOD had a wetter response over central India (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b, d), although this could indicate a greater contribution from the IOD rather than ENSO throughout the simulation (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e2356">There is little change in the SST pattern of the IOD in the LGM experiment (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c), with the only substantial changes occurring within the Maritime Continent. This is likely associated with the sub-aerial exposure of the Sunda Shelf <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.147"/>, which is handled differently by the different models and with varied responses in the atmospheric circulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.148"/>. The rainfall teleconnection pattern associated with the IOD is severely damped in the LGM experiment. This likely occurs as a consequence of the Clausius–Clapeyron relationship; the regression is performed on absolute rather than relative rainfall, and there is a substantial reduction in climatological precipitation across the tropics (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>g).</p>
      <p id="d1e2369">The change in the IOD pattern of SST in the abrupt4xCO2 experiment (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>d) sees an equatorward shift in the cold pole, combined with a slight expansion westwards along the Equator. The ensemble does not show a consistent response of changes in the warm pole, although there is some consistency in the Arabian Sea with most models showing an expansion of the warm pole there. Interestingly, in the abrupt4xCO2 experiment anomalous rainfall variations<?pagebreak page691?> associated with positive IOD events (which generate drying over the east – see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>h) reduce across the Indian Ocean (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>h).</p>
      <p id="d1e2378">The Indian Ocean Basin Mode (IOBM) involves synchronous fluctuations across the whole basin. Its amplitude can be measured by looking at the standard deviation of the tropical Indian Ocean (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b). The PMIP4 ensemble shows large variations in the quality of their simulation in the piControl, ranging from roughly one-third to 1.5 times the amplitude seen in the 20th-Century Reanalysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.149"><named-content content-type="pre">0.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</named-content></xref>. In the LGM experiment, there is no change in the median IOBM amplitude, despite more than two-thirds of the ensemble suggesting an increase and COSMOS-ASO simulating a dramatic one. The midHolocene ensemble shows a slight reduction in IOBM amplitude, seen in 22 of the 28 members with a mean reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. A similar behaviour is seen in the lig127k ensemble, although the amplitude reduction is slightly stronger, with an ensemble mean reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b). There is a slight increase in IOBM amplitude under the abrupt4xCO2 experiment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.150"><named-content content-type="pre">as suggested by, e.g., </named-content></xref>, although the ensemble as a whole is equivocal, with only 12 of the 25 members agreeing in sign with this mean.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Relationship with the mean state</title>
      <p id="d1e2441">In this work, we have looked at both the response of the mean state of the Indian Ocean and its variability under a variety of experiments. We found changes in both of these properties and have discussed some spatial relationships between their ensemble mean responses. A natural extension of this is to ask if there exist underlying relationships that act across all the different experiments. The changes in the Indian Ocean Basin Mode (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b) were weak in every experiment, yet there were substantial basin-wide SST changes in the LGM and abrupt4xCO2 experiment (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). It should therefore come as little surprise that PMIP4–CMIP6 demonstrates no significant relationship between the changes in the mean tropical Indian Ocean Index and changes in its standard deviation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2452">Relationships between the amplitude changes in modes of Indian Ocean variability and the mean state. <bold>(a)</bold> The strength of the Indian Ocean Basin Mode does not respond to changes in the tropical Indian Ocean SST. <bold>(b)</bold> The strength of the Indian Ocean Dipole mode does not exhibit a simple linear relationship with annual mean changes in the zonal gradient. <bold>(c)</bold> Changes in IOD strength are connected with changes in seasonal cycle of the SST gradient, here represented as changes in the differences between the strongest and weakest monthly SST gradients. The black solid line indicates a statistically significant linear regression across the whole ensemble.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/681/2023/cp-19-681-2023-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page692?><p id="d1e2470">The literature suggests that changes in the mean state of the Indian Ocean can map onto the Dipole Mode Index <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.151"/>. This is further suggested to result in changes in the IOD <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.152"/> via changes in the equatorial thermocline <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101" id="paren.153"/>. The PMIP4–CMIP6 ensemble shows little consistency among changes in the mean gradient between the two poles of the Dipole Mode Index and the variability of the index (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b). Even separating out just individual experiments shows a muted relationship. Given the large ensemble size and that the majority of the experiments have reached quasi-equilibrium, there is little scope for the initial conditions of internal variability to influence the IOD changes under this experiment, highlighted as an important source of uncertainty in future projections by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.154"/>. It should be noted that the method adopted here not only combines positive and negative modes of the IOD but also moderate and strong positive events, which have been shown to respond differently under future warming <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.155"/>. However, orbital changes result in different seasonal temperature changes in the west and east Indian Ocean, most visibly in the lig127k experiment (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>e, f). This means that the annual cycle of the SST difference measured by the Dipole Mode Index varies under orbital forcing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.156"/> and also happens to occur in the other experiments. One way to explore this seasonality is to look the amplitude of the annual cycle (i.e. the difference between the maximum and minimum monthly SST gradients). Changes in the amplitude of the seasonal cycle are inversely proportional to the changes in the IOD strength (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c). Further independent research supports the importance of the changes in seasonal cycle in the midHolocene ensemble <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.157"/> and looks at the physical mechanisms behind their influence. Taken together these findings suggest there is potential to constrain the future projections of the IOD with <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>(palaeo-)<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> observations of the seasonal change in SST gradients.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Pacific influence via ENSO</title>
      <p id="d1e2513">There is a strong link between variability in the Pacific Ocean, predominantly the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), and that in the Indian Ocean. This impacts both the IOD <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.158"/> and the IOBM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="paren.159"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.160"/> have already explored changes in ENSO across the PMIP4–CMIP6 ensemble. They saw consistent reductions in ENSO amplitude in both the lig127k and midHolocene experiments but little consistency across the other two experiments presented here. Similar to the results shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a and b, there is no universal relationship between mean state changes in the equatorial Pacific and the amplitude of ENSO <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.161"/>. The amplitude of ENSO in the various experiments, as measured by the standard deviation of the smoothed monthly Niño3.4 SST anomalies, is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a. The damping of ENSO in the orbital simulations is most visible in the lig127k experiment. There are hints of an increase in the abrupt4xCO2 experiment; however, the ensemble is equivocal, with 11 out of 25 models showing a reduction in ENSO amplitude. Despite this lack of consistency in the simulated direction of change, the ensemble demonstrates a strong positive relationship between the changes in the  amplitude of ENSO and those of the IOBM (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b), which is statistically significant. This conforms nicely with our pre-existing knowledge of the role of ENSO as a driver for IOBM events <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="paren.162"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2540">Relationships between the amplitude changes in modes of Indian Ocean variability and the mean state. <bold>(a)</bold> The amplitude of Pacific ENSO is measured by the standard deviation of the Niño3.4 SST anomalies (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>). <bold>(b)</bold> Amplitude changes in the IOBM are strongly related to changes in ENSO amplitude. <bold>(c)</bold> Amplitude changes in the IOD show some signs of being related of changes in ENSO amplitude. <bold>(d)</bold> There is a weak indication suggesting that as ENSO amplitude becomes larger, its correlation with the IOD also strengthens. The red solid lines show a statistically significant linear relationship in the abrupt4xCO2 experiment. Yellow–green dashed lines show the linear regressions across the two orbital experiments that are not statistically significant.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/681/2023/cp-19-681-2023-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2563">The relationship between changes in ENSO and the IOD are more nuanced. ENSO is known to play a role in a proportion of IOD events <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.163"/>, although by no means all of them <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.164"/>. Therefore if ENSO is<?pagebreak page693?> damped one might reasonably expect that the IOD also becomes weaker. Alternatively one could envisage that ENSO's relative importance for the IOD becomes less, as has been posited before for palaeoclimate periods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.165"/>. We explore both possibilities through scatter plots between and the ENSO amplitude (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c) and the IOD amplitude (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>d). Statistically significant lines of best fit could be drawn in both cases for the ensemble as a whole, yet it is unclear if this a wise choice. There is a strong contribution from the abrupt4xco2 experiments between changes in the amplitude of ENSO and both the IOD amplitude and its correlation with ENSO (shown as solid red lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c, d). However, neither line passes through the origin, which would be required as these are scatter plots of anomalies from the piControl and thus call for invoking model biases or other uncertainties. Equally, the relationships are not supported across the pair of orbital experiments, both of which do show a linear regression of the same sign (yellow–green lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c, d) but neither of which are statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Ni\~{n}o-like mode}?><title>Niño-like mode</title>
      <p id="d1e2593"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.166"/> propose the existence of a third mode of interannual variability in the Indian Ocean, unobserved in the modern climate but which may have been active during the Last Glacial Maximum. Sediment cores in the eastern equatorial basin display evidence of interannual variability that cannot be explained by either the IOD or the IOBM alone. Instead, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.167"/> demonstrate that an equatorial mode, characteristically similar to ENSO, drove SST variability in much the same way as is currently observed in the equatorial Pacific. The disappearance and possible future re-emergence of this mode are related to changes in the mean state tropical climate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.168"/>. Few PMIP models are capable of capturing the changes in regional hydroclimate inferred from LGM proxies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.169"/>. However, those that can, also exhibit a weakening of the Indian Walker circulation induced by the exposure of the Sunda and Sahul shelves. Anomalous divergence and easterly wind anomalies over the<?pagebreak page694?> exposed shelves then increase coastal upwelling off Indonesia, shoaling the thermocline and steepening the equatorial SST gradient <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.170"/>. These conditions favour a mode of variability which, unlike the IOD, is characterized by a distinctively equatorial pattern with interannual warm and cool events of equivalent magnitude <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.171"/>. Similar to a Pacific El Niño, its warm phase is preceded by a Kelvin wave in the thermocline that propagates from west to east. The projected response of the IO to greenhouse warming bears similarities to the simulated LGM, including a shoaling of the thermocline and a steeper equatorial SST gradient <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101" id="paren.172"/>. It has therefore been proposed that this Indian Ocean “Niño-like mode” could re-emerge in certain emission scenarios <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.173"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2620">Here, we define the Niño-like mode index as the standard deviation of SST anomalies in the eastern equatorial Indian Ocean (EEIO; Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.174"/> demonstrate that SST anomalies are at best an approximation for the Niño-like mode, since the equatorial shift in the IOD in some climates can also contribute to SST anomalies in this region. Ideally, the mode would be identified by its atmospheric precursor: wind anomalies in the western basin. However, these fields are not universally available. The EEIO region overlaps in its bottom corner with that used to identify the southern-eastern pole of the IOD and is clearly contained in the basin-wide anomalies used to track the IOBM. Nonetheless, we note that the IOD influence over equatorial SSTs is small relative to the Niño-like mode in simulations by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.175"/>, and there is little relationship between the amplitude changes in IOD and EEIO (not shown). The amplitude of the Niño-like mode in each experiment is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a. The piControl ensemble exhibits a range of standard deviations between 0.18  and 0.53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, yet the ensemble median (0.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) is rather close to that of the reanalysis (0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2663">Response of Niño modes.  <bold>(a)</bold> The amplitude of the Indian Ocean Niño-like mode is measured by the standard deviation of the eastern equatorial Indian Ocean SST anomalies (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/> for definition). <bold>(b)</bold> The relationship between variability changes in the eastern equatorial Indian Ocean and the mean zonal gradient across the Indian Ocean, measured by the DMI. <bold>(c)</bold> The changes in the correlation coefficient between the two Niño modes, as a function of changes in the amplitude of Pacific ENSO. <bold>(d)</bold> The changes in the correlation   coefficient between the Indian Ocean Dipole and the Indian Ocean Niño-like mode, as a function of changes in the amplitude of the Indian Ocean Dipole. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/681/2023/cp-19-681-2023-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2687">The most robust response is observed in the lig127k ensemble, in which 13 of 14 models agree on an increase in amplitude during the last interglacial. Only MIROC-ES2L simulates a decrease in variability (of 46 %) with the remaining models averaging a 17 % increase. In contrast, the other experiments show little to no agreement between models, with the mean amplitude going largely unchanged from the piControl. Even the lgm experiment, which is the only past climatic period previously analysed for the existence of this mode, has little agreement: the amplitude increases in six models and decreases in six models (the substantial increase from COSMOS-ASO does shift the ensemble mean in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a though). Across PMIP, a roughly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship emerges between amplitude changes in variability within the EEIO region and across the whole basin (as measured by IOBM strength), which is statistically significant. This behaviour would be expected in the absence of the Niño-like mode. However, the relationship does not exist for the lig127k ensemble, where the consistent increase in EEIO standard deviation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a) occurs despite a decrease in variability across the whole basin (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b). It is also interesting that the dominant period of interannual variability of in the EEIO region reduces under orbital forcing (not shown; see the “Code and data availability” section). These two observations provide further evidence that a Niño-like mode can emerge under certain climate states.</p>
      <p id="d1e2708"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.176"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.177"/> both use CESM1.2 in their model analysis. However, its CMIP6 successor, CESM2, lacks an lgm experiment at the time of writing. Its predecessor, CCSM4, is included here and exhibits an 8 % decline in variability. However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.178"/> explicitly note that CCSM4 fails to simulate the eastern drying and western wetting reconstructed from proxies, as do most CMIP5 models. They argue that this is due to its inadequate atmospheric response to shelf exposure, a key mechanism in the onset of the Niño-like mode. Although this is the first analysis of the Niño-like mode in CMIP6, we acknowledge that this systematic bias may persist into our results. An updated review of PMIP4 with respect to glacial hydroclimate proxies, similar to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.179"/>, would be required to clarify this point. Nonetheless, the robust increase in variability in the lig127k experiment presents an opportunity for the Niño-like mode to be studied in past climates other than the LGM.</p>
      <p id="d1e2722">How the Niño-like mode interacts with other modes of variability is relatively unexplored. The proximity of the Niño-like mode's equatorial arm to the IOD region off of Sumatra and Java and the observation that both modes peak in boreal autumn lead to the reasonable assumption that the two might influence each another through either changes in mean state or variability. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.180"/> link the future re-emergence of the Niño mode with a shoaling of the thermocline and enhanced upwelling in the eastern basin, conditions which resemble a positive IOD. Furthermore, there is a realistic possibility that ENSO could influence the Niño-like mode as it does the IOBM (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b) and, to a lesser extent, the IOD (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b shows a statistically significant relationship between the mean equatorial SST gradient and the amplitude of the Niño-like mode in the lig127k experiment, which also passes through the origin. However, this relationship is not shared across the rest of the ensemble. Potentially this arises from the strong and consistent changes in the seasonality seen in the lig127k experiment, as this was shown to impact the IOD (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c).</p>
      <p id="d1e2736">We also investigate influences on the relationship between the Niño-like mode and the IOD through an analysis of their correlation. Although <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.181"/> demonstrated the independence of the Niño-like mode through its unique precursors, neither they nor <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.182"/> quantified its synchronicity with the IOD. Here, we find that 88 of 114 simulations across all experiments exhibit a negative correlation between the Dipole Mode Index and the EEIO index, with a mean of correlation coefficient of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The strong positive IOD event in 1997–1998 was associated with ENSO and produced SST anomalies in the EEIO <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.183"/>. However, there is no connection between changes in<?pagebreak page695?> the correlation of the IOD and Niño-like modes and changes in either ENSO (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>c) or the IOD amplitude (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>d). We also find that the correlation between the DMI and EEIO index becomes stronger (i.e. more negative) in all models during the lig127k experiment. Distinguishing between a “switching on” of the Niño-like mode in the lig127k experiment and the IOD pattern bleeding into equatorial regions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c, similar to the strong positive IOD in 1997–1998) is challenging. Further detailed investigation into the role of changes in seasonality and phase locking of both modes and their atmospheric precursor would be particularly useful.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2775">Using PMIP4 simulations, we have explored how changes in mean climatic Indian Ocean conditions affect its multiple modes of interannual variability across both globally warm and cool palaeoclimate. From this model ensemble, we focus on four palaeoclimate intervals that allow us to assess the response to orbital (“midHolocene”, “lig127k”) and greenhouse gas forcing (“lgm”, “abrupt4xCO2”). We find ensemble mean climatic differences between these experiments and ones forced under preindustrial conditions to be in line with expectations. Yet, across all simulations, there was no systematic relationship between indices of coupled climate variability and zonal SST gradients. Models reproduce observed patterns of IO variability but show different responses to the disparate forcing scenarios. No robust changes are seen in any interannual mode, including the IOD, IOBM, and a recently hypothesized interannual mode of equatorial variability (the Niño-like mode) for the greenhouse gas experiments (lgm and abrupt4xCO2). Under orbital forcing, the IOD robustly weakens in the midHolocene experiment but not in lig127k, which shows a small ensemble mean weakening. Both experiments suggest that the altered orbit results in an IOD with an extended cold pole along the Equator, linked to anomalous rainfall responses over the central Indian Ocean. Interestingly, orbital damping of ENSO also damps the IOBM, a result robust across both experiments. Characterized by SST anomalies in the eastern equatorial<?pagebreak page696?> Indian Ocean (EEIO), the Niño-like mode shows a robust increase in the lig127k experiment and is slightly increased under the lgm experiment.
Only the coupling of the changes in the strength of the Indian Ocean Basin Mode (IOBM) with changes in ENSO strength was consistent across experiments: neither the IOD nor Niño-like mode showed robust relationships in any experiments. We find that proposed relationships between changes in the mean zonal SST gradient and IOD strength are not universal, although we find suggestions of a more nuanced relationship including variations in the seasonal cycle. Further work is required to fully understand the role of seasonality shifts in IOD changes, and reconstructions of their past changes have the potential to constrain model projections of future changes in Indian Ocean variability.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2782">NOAA/CIRES/DOE 20th-Century Reanalysis (V3) data provided by the NOAA PSL, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their website at <uri>https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.20thC_ReanV3.html</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="paren.184"/>. Climate simulation output is freely available to download from the Earth System Grid Federation. Outputs from PMIP3 and PMIP4 have been curated and processed following the workflow outlined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="text.185"/> and are available from them.</p>

      <p id="d1e2794">The codes used create the figures, along with data actually plotted, are available at <uri>https://github.com/pmip4/IndianOceanVariability</uri> (last access: 21 February 2023; <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7636502" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7636502</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="altparen.186"/>). This includes a netcdf file for every simulation containing the mean climate states, the IOD pattern, and time series of every climate mode discussed. There are also ensemble mean fields computed on the regular grid used by the IPCC's Interactive Atlas. The repository also has a single spreadsheet (summary_data/tidy_numbers.csv) compiling key statistics for all the simulations, such as the amplitude and dominant period for each of the four modes investigated here.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2809">CB and KT jointly conceived and coordinated the research. CB wrote the code and most of the first draft of the paper. EG performed initial analysis and wrote Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S1"/>. JB was responsible for Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/> on the Indian Ocean Niño-like mode. KT edited the whole document.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2819">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e2825">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2831">This work would not be possible without the generosity of all the modelling groups that donated their simulation output and the Earth System Grid Federation for distributing all that output. This work was inspired by a Global Engagement award from University College London.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2836">This research has been supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (grant no. NE/S009736/1) and the Directorate for Geosciences (grant no. 1903482).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2842">This paper was edited by Qiuzhen Yin and reviewed by Mehdi Pasha Karami and two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Abram et~al.(2007)Abram, Gagan, Liu, Hantoro, McCulloch, and
Suwargadi}}?><label>Abram et al.(2007)Abram, Gagan, Liu, Hantoro, McCulloch, and
Suwargadi</label><?label Abram2007?><mixed-citation>Abram, N. J., Gagan, M. K., Liu, Z., Hantoro, W. S., McCulloch, M. T., and
Suwargadi, B. W.: Seasonal characteristics of the Indian Ocean Dipole during
the Holocene epoch, Nature, 445, 299–302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05477" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature05477</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Abram et~al.(2020{\natexlab{a}})Abram, Hargreaves, Wright,
Thirumalai, Ummenhofer, and England}}?><label>Abram et al.(2020a)Abram, Hargreaves, Wright,
Thirumalai, Ummenhofer, and England</label><?label abram2020palaeoclimate?><mixed-citation>Abram, N. J., Hargreaves, J. A., Wright, N. M., Thirumalai, K., Ummenhofer,
C. C., and England, M. H.: Palaeoclimate perspectives on the Indian Ocean
dipole, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 237, 106302,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106302" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106302</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Abram et~al.(2020{\natexlab{b}})Abram, Wright, Ellis, Dixon, Wurtzel,
England, Ummenhofer, Philibosian, Cahyarini, Yu, Shen, Cheng, Edwards, and
Heslop}}?><label>Abram et al.(2020b)Abram, Wright, Ellis, Dixon, Wurtzel,
England, Ummenhofer, Philibosian, Cahyarini, Yu, Shen, Cheng, Edwards, and
Heslop</label><?label Abram2020b?><mixed-citation>Abram, N. J., Wright, N. M., Ellis, B., Dixon, B. C., Wurtzel, J. B., England,
M. H., Ummenhofer, C. C., Philibosian, B., Cahyarini, S. Y., Yu, T.-L., Shen,
C.-C., Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., and Heslop, D.: Coupling of Indo-Pacific
climate variability over the last millennium, Nature, 579, 385–392,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2084-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-020-2084-4</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ashok et~al.(2001)Ashok, Guan, and Yamagata}}?><label>Ashok et al.(2001)Ashok, Guan, and Yamagata</label><?label ashok2001impact?><mixed-citation>Ashok, K., Guan, Z., and Yamagata, T.: Impact of the Indian Ocean dipole on the
relationship between the Indian monsoon rainfall and ENSO, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 28, 4499–4502, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013294" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GL013294</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ashok et~al.(2003)Ashok, Guan, and Yamagata}}?><label>Ashok et al.(2003)Ashok, Guan, and Yamagata</label><?label ashok2003look?><mixed-citation>Ashok, K., Guan, Z., and Yamagata, T.: A look at the relationship between the
ENSO and the Indian Ocean dipole, J. Meteorol. Soc.
Jpn. Ser. II, 81, 41–56, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.81.41" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2151/jmsj.81.41</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bartlein and Shafer(2019)}}?><label>Bartlein and Shafer(2019)</label><?label bartlein2019paleo?><mixed-citation>Bartlein, P. J. and Shafer, S. L.: Paleo calendar-effect adjustments in time-slice and transient climate-model simulations (PaleoCalAdjust v1.0): impact and strategies for data analysis, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3889–3913, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3889-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-3889-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Behera and Yamagata(2001)}}?><label>Behera and Yamagata(2001)</label><?label behera2001subtropical?><mixed-citation>Behera, S. K. and Yamagata, T.: Subtropical SST dipole events in the southern
Indian Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 327–330,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL011451" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000GL011451</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Behera et~al.(2006)Behera, Luo, Masson, Rao, Sakuma, and
Yamagata}}?><label>Behera et al.(2006)Behera, Luo, Masson, Rao, Sakuma, and
Yamagata</label><?label behera2006cgcm?><mixed-citation>Behera, S. K., Luo, J. J., Masson, S., Rao, S. A., Sakuma, H., and Yamagata,
T.: A CGCM study on the interaction between IOD and ENSO, J.
Climate, 19, 1688–1705, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3797.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI3797.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Berger and Loutre(1991)}}?><label>Berger and Loutre(1991)</label><?label berger1991insolation?><mixed-citation>Berger, A. and Loutre, M.-F.: Insolation values for the climate of the last 10
million years, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 10, 297–317,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-3791(91)90033-q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0277-3791(91)90033-q</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Braconnot et~al.(2007)Braconnot, Otto-Bliesner, Harrison, Joussaume,
Peterchmitt, Abe-Ouchi, Crucifix, Driesschaert, Fichefet, Hewitt
et~al.}}?><label>Braconnot et al.(2007)Braconnot, Otto-Bliesner, Harrison, Joussaume,
Peterchmitt, Abe-Ouchi, Crucifix, Driesschaert, Fichefet, Hewitt
et al.</label><?label braconnot2007results?><mixed-citation>Braconnot, P., Otto-Bliesner, B., Harrison, S., Joussaume, S., Peterchmitt, J.-Y., Abe-Ouchi, A., Crucifix, M., Driesschaert, E., Fichefet, Th., Hewitt, C. D., Kageyama, M., Kitoh, A., Laîné, A., Loutr<?pagebreak page697?>e, M.-F., Marti, O., Merkel, U., Ramstein, G., Valdes, P., Weber, S. L., Yu, Y., and Zhao, Y.: Results of PMIP2 coupled simulations of the Mid-Holocene and Last Glacial Maximum – Part 1: experiments and large-scale features, Clim. Past, 3, 261–277, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-3-261-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-3-261-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Braconnot et al.(2012)}?><label>Braconnot et al.(2012)</label><?label braconnot2012evaluation?><mixed-citation>
Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Kageyama, M., Bartlein, P. J., Masson-Delmotte, V., Abe-Ouchi, A., Otto-Bliesner, B., and Zhao, Y.: Evaluation of climate models using palaeoclimatic data, Nat. Clim. Change, 2, 417–424, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Brierley(2023)}?><label>Brierley(2023)</label><?label zenodo?><mixed-citation>Brierley, C.:  pmip4/IndianOceanVariability: v1.1 (v1.1), Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7636502" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7636502</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Brierley and Wainer(2018)}}?><label>Brierley and Wainer(2018)</label><?label brierley2018inter?><mixed-citation>Brierley, C. and Wainer, I.: Inter-annual variability in the tropical Atlantic from the Last Glacial Maximum into future climate projections simulated by CMIP5/PMIP3, Clim. Past, 14, 1377–1390, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1377-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-14-1377-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Brierley et~al.(2020)Brierley, Zhao, Harrison, Braconnot, Williams,
Thornalley, Shi, Peterschmitt, Ohgaito, Kaufman, Kageyama, Hargreaves, Erb,
Emile-Geay, D'Agostino, Chandan, Carr\'{e}, Bartlein, Zheng, Zhang, Zhang,
Yang, Volodin, Tomas, Routson, Peltier, Otto-Bliesner, Morozova, McKay,
Lohmann, Legrande, Guo, Cao, Brady, Annan, and
Abe-Ouchi}}?><label>Brierley et al.(2020)Brierley, Zhao, Harrison, Braconnot, Williams,
Thornalley, Shi, Peterschmitt, Ohgaito, Kaufman, Kageyama, Hargreaves, Erb,
Emile-Geay, D'Agostino, Chandan, Carré, Bartlein, Zheng, Zhang, Zhang,
Yang, Volodin, Tomas, Routson, Peltier, Otto-Bliesner, Morozova, McKay,
Lohmann, Legrande, Guo, Cao, Brady, Annan, and
Abe-Ouchi</label><?label brierley2020midHolocene?><mixed-citation>Brierley, C. M., Zhao, A., Harrison, S. P., Braconnot, P., Williams, C. J. R., Thornalley, D. J. R., Shi, X., Peterschmitt, J.-Y., Ohgaito, R., Kaufman, D. S., Kageyama, M., Hargreaves, J. C., Erb, M. P., Emile-Geay, J., D'Agostino, R., Chandan, D., Carré, M., Bartlein, P. J., Zheng, W., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Q., Yang, H., Volodin, E. M., Tomas, R. A., Routson, C., Peltier, W. R., Otto-Bliesner, B., Morozova, P. A., McKay, N. P., Lohmann, G., Legrande, A. N., Guo, C., Cao, J., Brady, E., Annan, J. D., and Abe-Ouchi, A.: Large-scale features and evaluation of the PMIP4-CMIP6 midHolocene simulations, Clim. Past, 16, 1847–1872, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1847-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-16-1847-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Brown et~al.(2009)Brown, Lynch, and Marshall}}?><label>Brown et al.(2009)Brown, Lynch, and Marshall</label><?label brown2009variability?><mixed-citation>Brown, J., Lynch, A. H., and Marshall, A. G.: Variability of the Indian Ocean
Dipole in coupled model paleoclimate simulations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 114, D11105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010346" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010346</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Brown et~al.(2020)Brown, Brierley, An, Guarino, Stevenson, Williams,
Zhang, Zhao, Abe-Ouchi, Braconnot, Brady, Chandan, D'Agostino, Guo, LeGrande,
Lohmann, Morozova, Ohgaito, O'ishi, Otto-Bliesner, Peltier, Shi, Sime,
Volodin, Zhang, and Zheng}}?><label>Brown et al.(2020)Brown, Brierley, An, Guarino, Stevenson, Williams,
Zhang, Zhao, Abe-Ouchi, Braconnot, Brady, Chandan, D'Agostino, Guo, LeGrande,
Lohmann, Morozova, Ohgaito, O'ishi, Otto-Bliesner, Peltier, Shi, Sime,
Volodin, Zhang, and Zheng</label><?label brown2020pmip_enso?><mixed-citation>Brown, J. R., Brierley, C. M., An, S.-I., Guarino, M.-V., Stevenson, S., Williams, C. J. R., Zhang, Q., Zhao, A., Abe-Ouchi, A., Braconnot, P., Brady, E. C., Chandan, D., D'Agostino, R., Guo, C., LeGrande, A. N., Lohmann, G., Morozova, P. A., Ohgaito, R., O'ishi, R., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Peltier, W. R., Shi, X., Sime, L., Volodin, E. M., Zhang, Z., and Zheng, W.: Comparison of past and future simulations of ENSO in CMIP5/PMIP3 and CMIP6/PMIP4 models, Clim. Past, 16, 1777–1805, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1777-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-16-1777-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cai et~al.(2013)Cai, Zheng, Weller, Collins, Cowan, Lengaigne, Yu,
and Yamagata}}?><label>Cai et al.(2013)Cai, Zheng, Weller, Collins, Cowan, Lengaigne, Yu,
and Yamagata</label><?label cai2013projected?><mixed-citation>Cai, W., Zheng, X.-T., Weller, E., Collins, M., Cowan, T., Lengaigne, M., Yu,
W., and Yamagata, T.: Projected response of the Indian Ocean Dipole to
greenhouse warming, Nat. Geosci., 6, 999–1007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2009</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cai et~al.(2014)Cai, Santoso, Wang, Weller, Wu, Ashok, Masumoto, and
Yamagata}}?><label>Cai et al.(2014)Cai, Santoso, Wang, Weller, Wu, Ashok, Masumoto, and
Yamagata</label><?label cai2014increased?><mixed-citation>Cai, W., Santoso, A., Wang, G., Weller, E., Wu, L., Ashok, K., Masumoto, Y.,
and Yamagata, T.: Increased frequency of extreme Indian Ocean Dipole events
due to greenhouse warming, Nature, 510, 254–258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13327" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13327</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cai et~al.(2021{\natexlab{a}})Cai, Santoso, Collins, Dewitte,
Karamperidou, Kug, Lengaigne, McPhaden, Stuecker, Taschetto
et~al.}}?><label>Cai et al.(2021a)Cai, Santoso, Collins, Dewitte,
Karamperidou, Kug, Lengaigne, McPhaden, Stuecker, Taschetto
et al.</label><?label cai2021changing?><mixed-citation>Cai, W., Santoso, A., Collins, M., Dewitte, B., Karamperidou, C., Kug, J.-S., Lengaigne, M., McPhaden, M. J.,  Stuecker, M. F., Taschetto, A. S., Timmermann, A., Wu, L., Yeh, S.-W., Wang, G., Ng, B., Jia, F., Yang, Y., Ying, J.,  Zheng, X.-T., Bayr, T., Brown, J. R., Capotondi, A., Cobb, K. M., Gan, B., Geng, T., Ham, Y.-G., Jin, F.-F., Jo, H.-S., Li, X.,  Lin, X., McGregor, S., Park, J.-H., Stein, K., Yang, K., Zhang, L., and Zhong, W.:
Changing El Niño–Southern Oscillation in a warming climate, Nature
Reviews Earth &amp; Environment, 2, 628–644, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00199-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43017-021-00199-z</ext-link>,
2021a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cai et~al.(2021{\natexlab{b}})Cai, Yang, Wu, Huang, Santoso, Ng,
Wang, and Yamagata}}?><label>Cai et al.(2021b)Cai, Yang, Wu, Huang, Santoso, Ng,
Wang, and Yamagata</label><?label cai2021opposite?><mixed-citation>Cai, W., Yang, K., Wu, L., Huang, G., Santoso, A., Ng, B., Wang, G., and
Yamagata, T.: Opposite response of strong and moderate positive Indian Ocean
Dipole to global warming, Nat. Clim. Change, 11, 27–32,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00943-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41558-020-00943-1</ext-link>, 2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cassou et~al.(2021)Cassou, Cherchi, Kosaka, Corti, Engelbrecht, Lee,
Maycock, McGregor, Morgenstern, H.C., Rivera, Trewin, and
Phillips}}?><label>Cassou et al.(2021)Cassou, Cherchi, Kosaka, Corti, Engelbrecht, Lee,
Maycock, McGregor, Morgenstern, H.C., Rivera, Trewin, and
Phillips</label><?label IPCC_2021_WGI_AnnexIV?><mixed-citation>Cassou, C., Cherchi, A., Kosaka, Y., Corti, S., Engelbrecht, F., Lee, J.-Y.,
Maycock, A., McGregor, S., Morgenstern, O., Nnamchi, H. C., Rivera, J., Trewin, B.,
and Phillips, A.: Modes of Variability, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical
Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by:
Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger,
S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K.,
Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O.,
Yu, R., and Zhou, B., book section Annex IV, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,
<uri>https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_AnnexIV.pdf</uri> (last access: 13 February 2023),
2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cherchi et~al.(2021)Cherchi, Terray, Ratna, Sankar, Sooraj, and
Behera}}?><label>Cherchi et al.(2021)Cherchi, Terray, Ratna, Sankar, Sooraj, and
Behera</label><?label cherchi2021indian?><mixed-citation>Cherchi, A., Terray, P., Ratna, S. B., Sankar, S., Sooraj, K., and Behera, S.:
Indian ocean dipole influence on Indian summer monsoon and ENSO: a
review, Indian Summer Monsoon Variability, El-Nino Teleconnections and Beyond, 157–182,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-822402-1.00011-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/b978-0-12-822402-1.00011-9</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Collins et~al.(2010)Collins, An, Cai, Ganachaud, Guilyardi, Jin,
Jochum, Lengaigne, Power, Timmermann et~al.}}?><label>Collins et al.(2010)Collins, An, Cai, Ganachaud, Guilyardi, Jin,
Jochum, Lengaigne, Power, Timmermann et al.</label><?label collins2010impact?><mixed-citation>Collins, M., An, S. I., Cai, W. J., Ganachaud, A., Guilyardi, E., Jin, F. F., Jochum, M., Lengaigne, M., Power, S., Timmermann, A., Vecchi, G., and Wittenberg, A.: The impact of
global warming on the tropical Pacific Ocean and El Niño, Nat.
Geosci., 3, 391–397, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo868</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Collins et~al.(2013)Collins, Knutti, Arblaster, Dufresne, Fichefet,
Friedlingstein, Gao, Gutowski, Johns, Krinner, Shongwe, Tebaldi, Weaver, and
Wehner}}?><label>Collins et al.(2013)Collins, Knutti, Arblaster, Dufresne, Fichefet,
Friedlingstein, Gao, Gutowski, Johns, Krinner, Shongwe, Tebaldi, Weaver, and
Wehner</label><?label collins2013long?><mixed-citation>Collins, M., Knutti, R., Arblaster, J., Dufresne, J.-L., Fichefet, T.,
Friedlingstein, P., Gao, X., Gutowski, W. J., Johns, T., Krinner, G.,
Shongwe, M., Tebaldi, C., Weaver, A., and Wehner, M.: Long-term climate
change: projections, commitments and irreversibility, in: Climate Change
2013-The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by:
Stocker, T., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S., Boschung, J.,
Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P.,  Cambridge
University Press, 1029–1136, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.024</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Compo et~al.(2011)Compo, Whitaker, Sardeshmukh, Matsui, Allan, Yin,
Gleason, Vose, Rutledge, Bessemoulin, Brönnimann, Brunet, Crouthamel, Grant,
Groisman, Jones, Kruk, Kruger, Marshall, Maugeri, Mok, Nordli, Ross, Trigo,
Wang, Woodruff, and Worley}}?><label>Compo et al.(2011)Compo, Whitaker, Sardeshmukh, Matsui, Allan, Yin,
Gleason, Vose, Rutledge, Bessemoulin, Brönnimann, Brunet, Crouthamel, Grant,
Groisman, Jones, Kruk, Kruger, Marshall, Maugeri, Mok, Nordli, Ross, Trigo,
Wang, Woodruff, and Worley</label><?label compo2011?><mixed-citation>Compo, G. P., Whitaker, J. S., Sardeshmukh, P. D., Matsui, N., Allan, R. J.,
Yin, X., Gleason, B. E., Vose, R. S., Rutledge, G., Bessemoulin, P.,
Brönnimann, S., Brunet, M., Crouthamel, R. I., Grant, A. N., Groisman,
P. Y., Jones, P. D., Kruk, M. C., Kruger, A. C., Marshall, G. J., Maugeri,
M., Mok, H. Y., Nordli, Ø., Ross, T. F., Trigo, R. M., Wang, X. L.,
Woodruff, S. D., and Worley, S. J.: The twentieth century reanalysis project,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 1–28,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.776" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.776</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cowan et~al.(2015)Cowan, Cai, Ng, and England}}?><label>Cowan et al.(2015)Cowan, Cai, Ng, and England</label><?label cowan2015response?><mixed-citation>Cowan, T., Cai, W., Ng, B., and England, M.: The response of the Indian Ocean
dipole asymmetry to anthropogenic aerosols and greenhouse gases, J.
Climate, 28, 2564–2583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00661.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00661.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{D'Agostino et al.(2019)}?><label>D'Agostino et al.(2019)</label><?label dagostino2019northern?><mixed-citation>D'Agostino, R., Bader, J., Bordoni, S., Ferreira, D., and Jungclaus, J.: Northern Hemisphere Monsoon Response to Mid-Holocene Orbital Forcing and Greenhouse Gas-Induced Global Warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 1591–1601, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081589" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL081589</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Di~Nezio et~al.(2016)Di~Nezio, Timmermann, Tierney, Jin,
Otto-Bliesner, Rosenbloom, Mapes, Neale, Ivanovic, and
Montenegro}}?><label>Di Nezio et al.(2016)Di Nezio, Timmermann, Tierney, Jin,
Otto-Bliesner, Rosenbloom, Mapes, Neale, Ivanovic, and
Montenegro</label><?label dinezio2016climate?><mixed-citation>Di Nezio, P. N., Timmermann, A., Tierney, J. E., Jin, F.-F., Otto-Bliesner, B.,
Rosenbloom, N., Mapes, B., Neale, R., Ivanovic, R. F., and Montenegro, A.:
The climate response of the Indo-Pacific warm pool to glacial sea level,
Paleoceanography, 31, 866–894, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015PA002890" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015PA002890</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page698?><ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{DiNezio and Tierney(2013)}}?><label>DiNezio and Tierney(2013)</label><?label dinezio2013effect?><mixed-citation>DiNezio, P. N. and Tierney, J. E.: The effect of sea level on glacial
Indo-Pacific climate, Nat. Geosci., 6, 485–491, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1823" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1823</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{DiNezio et~al.(2018)DiNezio, Tierney, Otto-Bliesner, Timmermann,
Bhattacharya, Rosenbloom, and Brady}}?><label>DiNezio et al.(2018)DiNezio, Tierney, Otto-Bliesner, Timmermann,
Bhattacharya, Rosenbloom, and Brady</label><?label DiNezio2018?><mixed-citation>DiNezio, P. N., Tierney, J. E., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Timmermann, A.,
Bhattacharya, T., Rosenbloom, N., and Brady, E.: Glacial changes in tropical
climate amplified by the Indian Ocean, Science Advances, 4, eaat9658,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat9658" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aat9658</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{DiNezio et~al.(2020)DiNezio, Puy, Thirumalai, Jin, and
Tierney}}?><label>DiNezio et al.(2020)DiNezio, Puy, Thirumalai, Jin, and
Tierney</label><?label dinezio2020emergence?><mixed-citation>DiNezio, P. N., Puy, M., Thirumalai, K., Jin, F.-F., and Tierney, J. E.:
Emergence of an equatorial mode of climate variability in the Indian Ocean,
Science Advances, 6, eaay7684, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay7684" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aay7684</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Eyring et~al.(2016a)}}?><label>Eyring et al.(2016a)</label><?label eyring2016overview?><mixed-citation>Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Eyring et~al.(2016b)}}?><label>Eyring et al.(2016b)</label><?label eyring2016esmvaltool?><mixed-citation>Eyring, V., Righi, M., Lauer, A., Evaldsson, M., Wenzel, S., Jones, C., Anav, A., Andrews, O., Cionni, I., Davin, E. L., Deser, C., Ehbrecht, C., Friedlingstein, P., Gleckler, P., Gottschaldt, K.-D., Hagemann, S., Juckes, M., Kindermann, S., Krasting, J., Kunert, D., Levine, R., Loew, A., Mäkelä, J., Martin, G., Mason, E., Phillips, A. S., Read, S., Rio, C., Roehrig, R., Senftleben, D., Sterl, A., van Ulft, L. H., Walton, J., Wang, S., and Williams, K. D.: ESMValTool (v1.0) – a community diagnostic and performance metrics tool for routine evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1747–1802, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1747-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-1747-2016</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Eyring et~al.(2021)Eyring, Gillett, Achuta~Rao, Barimalala,
Barreiro~Parrillo, Bellouin, Cassou, Durack, Kosaka, McGregor, Min,
Morgenstern, and Sun}}?><label>Eyring et al.(2021)Eyring, Gillett, Achuta Rao, Barimalala,
Barreiro Parrillo, Bellouin, Cassou, Durack, Kosaka, McGregor, Min,
Morgenstern, and Sun</label><?label IPCC_2021_WGI_Ch_3?><mixed-citation>Eyring, V., Gillett, N. P., Achuta Rao, K. M., Barimalala, R.,
Barreiro Parrillo, M., Bellouin, N., Cassou, C., Durack, P. J., Kosaka, Y.,
McGregor, S., Min, S., Morgenstern, O., and Sun, Y.: Human Influence on the
Climate System, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis.
Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V.,
Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen,
Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E.,
Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and
Zhou, B., chap. 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United
<uri>https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Chapter_03.pdf</uri> (last access: 13 February 2023),
2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Flato et~al.(2013)Flato, Marotzke, Abiodun, Braconnot, Chou, Collins,
Cox, Driouech, Emori, Eyring, Forest, Gleckler, Guilyardi, Jakob, Kattsov,
Reason, Rummukainen, AchutaRao, Anav, Andrews, Baehr, Bindoff, Bodas-Salcedo,
Catto, Chambers, Chang, Dai, Deser, Doblas-Reyes, Durack, Eby, de~Elia,
Fichefet, Forster, Frame, Fyfe, Gbobaniyi, Gillett, González-Rouco, Goodess,
Griffies, Hall, Harrison, Hense, Hunke, Ilyina, Ivanova, Johnson, Kageyama,
Kharin, Klein, Knight, Knutti, Landerer, Lee, Li, Mahowald, Mears, Meehl,
Morice, Msadek, Myhre, Neelin, Painter, Pavlova, Perlwitz, Peterschmitt,
Räisänen, Rauser, Reid, Rodwell, Santer, Scaife, Schulz, Scinocca, Sexton,
Shindell, Shiogama, Sillmann, Simmons, Sperber, Stephenson, Stevens, Stott,
Sutton, Thorne, van Oldenborgh, Vecchi, Webb, Williams, Woollings, Xie, and
Zhang}}?><label>Flato et al.(2013)Flato, Marotzke, Abiodun, Braconnot, Chou, Collins,
Cox, Driouech, Emori, Eyring, Forest, Gleckler, Guilyardi, Jakob, Kattsov,
Reason, Rummukainen, AchutaRao, Anav, Andrews, Baehr, Bindoff, Bodas-Salcedo,
Catto, Chambers, Chang, Dai, Deser, Doblas-Reyes, Durack, Eby, de Elia,
Fichefet, Forster, Frame, Fyfe, Gbobaniyi, Gillett, González-Rouco, Goodess,
Griffies, Hall, Harrison, Hense, Hunke, Ilyina, Ivanova, Johnson, Kageyama,
Kharin, Klein, Knight, Knutti, Landerer, Lee, Li, Mahowald, Mears, Meehl,
Morice, Msadek, Myhre, Neelin, Painter, Pavlova, Perlwitz, Peterschmitt,
Räisänen, Rauser, Reid, Rodwell, Santer, Scaife, Schulz, Scinocca, Sexton,
Shindell, Shiogama, Sillmann, Simmons, Sperber, Stephenson, Stevens, Stott,
Sutton, Thorne, van Oldenborgh, Vecchi, Webb, Williams, Woollings, Xie, and
Zhang</label><?label flato2013evaluation?><mixed-citation>Flato, G., Marotzke, J., Abiodun, B., Braconnot, P., Chou, S. C., Collins, W.,
Cox, P., Driouech, F., Emori, S., Eyring, V., Forest, C., Gleckler, P.,
Guilyardi, E., Jakob, C., Kattsov, V., Reason, C., Rummukainen, M.,
AchutaRao, K., Anav, A., Andrews, T., Baehr, J., Bindoff, N. L.,
Bodas-Salcedo, A., Catto, J., Chambers, D., Chang, P., Dai, A., Deser, C.,
Doblas-Reyes, F., Durack, P. J., Eby, M., de Elia, R., Fichefet, T., Forster,
P., Frame, D., Fyfe, J., Gbobaniyi, E., Gillett, N., González-Rouco, J. F.,
Goodess, C., Griffies, S., Hall, A., Harrison, S., Hense, A., Hunke, E.,
Ilyina, T., Ivanova, D., Johnson, G., Kageyama, M., Kharin, V., Klein, S. A.,
Knight, J., Knutti, R., Landerer, F., Lee, T., Li, H., Mahowald, N., Mears,
C., Meehl, G., Morice, C., Msadek, R., Myhre, G., Neelin, J. D., Painter, J.,
Pavlova, T., Perlwitz, J., Peterschmitt, J.-Y., Räisänen, J., Rauser, F.,
Reid, J., Rodwell, M., Santer, B., Scaife, A. A., Schulz, J., Scinocca, J.,
Sexton, D., Shindell, D., Shiogama, H., Sillmann, J., Simmons, A., Sperber,
K., Stephenson, D., Stevens, B., Stott, P., Sutton, R., Thorne, P. W., van
Oldenborgh, G. J., Vecchi, G., Webb, M., Williams, K., Woollings, T., Xie,
S.-P., and Zhang, J.: Evaluation of climate models, in: Climate change 2013:
the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by:
Stocker, T., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S., Boschung, J.,
Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P.,   741–866, Cambridge
University Press, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.020</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ford et~al.(2015)Ford, Ravelo, and Polissar}}?><label>Ford et al.(2015)Ford, Ravelo, and Polissar</label><?label Ford2015?><mixed-citation>Ford, H. L., Ravelo, A. C., and Polissar, P. J.: Reduced El
Niño–Southern Oscillation during the Last Glacial Maximum, Science,
347, 255–258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258437" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1258437</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Gregory et al.(2004)}?><label>Gregory et al.(2004)</label><?label gregory2004new?><mixed-citation>Gregory, J. M., Ingram, W. J., Palmer, M. A., Jones, G. S., Stott, P. A., Thorpe, R. B., Lowe, J. A., Johns, T. C., and Williams, K. D.: A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L03205,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl018747" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003gl018747</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gulev et~al.(2021)Gulev, Thorne, Ahn, Dentener, Domingues, Gerland,
Gong, Kaufman, Nnamchi, Quaas, Rivera, Sathyendranath, Smith, Trewin, von
Shuckmann, and Vose}}?><label>Gulev et al.(2021)Gulev, Thorne, Ahn, Dentener, Domingues, Gerland,
Gong, Kaufman, Nnamchi, Quaas, Rivera, Sathyendranath, Smith, Trewin, von
Shuckmann, and Vose</label><?label IPCC_2021_WGI_Ch_2?><mixed-citation>Gulev, S. K., Thorne, P. W., Ahn, J., Dentener, F. J., Domingues, C. M.,
Gerland, S., Gong, D., Kaufman, D. S., Nnamchi, H. C., Quaas, J., Rivera,
J. A., Sathyendranath, S., Smith, S. L., Trewin, B., von Shuckmann, K., and
Vose, R. S.: Changing State of the Climate System, in: Climate Change 2021:
The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by:
Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger,
S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K.,
Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O.,
Yu, R., and Zhou, B., chap. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,
<uri>https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Chapter_02.pdf</uri> (last access: 13 February 2023),
2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Guo et~al.(2018)Guo, Liu, Yang, and Fan}}?><label>Guo et al.(2018)Guo, Liu, Yang, and Fan</label><?label guo2018three?><mixed-citation>Guo, F., Liu, Q., Yang, J., and Fan, L.: Three types of Indian Ocean basin
modes, Clim. Dynam., 51, 4357–4370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3676-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-017-3676-z</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Halder et~al.(2021)Halder, Parekh, Chowdary, Gnanaseelan, and
Kulkarni}}?><label>Halder et al.(2021)Halder, Parekh, Chowdary, Gnanaseelan, and
Kulkarni</label><?label halder2021assessment?><mixed-citation>Halder, S., Parekh, A., Chowdary, J. S., Gnanaseelan, C., and Kulkarni, A.:
Assessment of CMIP6 models' skill for tropical Indian Ocean sea surface
temperature variability, Int. J. Climatol., 41,
2568–2588, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6975" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.6975</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Heede et~al.(2021)Heede, Fedorov, and Burls}}?><label>Heede et al.(2021)Heede, Fedorov, and Burls</label><?label heede2021stronger?><mixed-citation>Heede, U. K., Fedorov, A. V., and Burls, N. J.: A stronger versus weaker
Walker: understanding model differences in fast and slow tropical Pacific
responses to global warming, Clim. Dynam., 57, 2505–2522,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05818-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-021-05818-5</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hrudya et~al.(2021)Hrudya, Varikoden, and Vishnu}}?><label>Hrudya et al.(2021)Hrudya, Varikoden, and Vishnu</label><?label hrudya2021review?><mixed-citation>Hrudya, P., Varikoden, H., and Vishnu, R.: A review on the Indian summer
monsoon rainfall, variability and its association with ENSO and IOD,
Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 133, 1–14,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-020-00734-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00703-020-00734-5</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hu et~al.(2014)Hu, Huang, Zheng, Xie, Qu, Du, and
Liu}}?><label>Hu et al.(2014)Hu, Huang, Zheng, Xie, Qu, Du, and
Liu</label><?label hu2014interdecadal?><mixed-citation>Hu, K., Huang, G., Zheng, X.-T., Xie, S.-P., Qu, X., Du, Y., and Liu, L.:
Interdecadal variations in ENSO influences on northwest Pacific–East
Asian early summertime climate simulated in CMIP5 models, J.
Climate, 27, 5982–5998, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00268.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00268.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Huang et~al.(2016)Huang, Hu, Qu, Tao, Yao, Zhao, and
Jiang}}?><label>Huang et al.(2016)Huang, Hu, Qu, Tao, Yao, Zhao, and
Jiang</label><?label huang2016review?><mixed-citation>Huang, G., Hu, K., Qu, X., Tao, W., Yao, S., Zhao, G., and Jiang, W.: A review
about Indian Ocean basin mode and its impacts on East Asian summer
climate, Chin. J. Atmos. Sci, 40, 121–130,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1505.15143" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1505.15143</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page699?><ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Huang et~al.(2022)Huang, Zhang, Liu, and Stuecker}}?><label>Huang et al.(2022)Huang, Zhang, Liu, and Stuecker</label><?label huang2022?><mixed-citation>Huang, Z., Zhang, W., Liu, C., and Stuecker, M. F.: Extreme Indian Ocean dipole
events associated with El Niño and Madden–Julian oscillation, Clim.
Dynam.,  59,   1953–1968,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06190-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-022-06190-8</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hui and Zheng(2018)}}?><label>Hui and Zheng(2018)</label><?label hui2018uncertainty?><mixed-citation>Hui, C. and Zheng, X.-T.: Uncertainty in Indian Ocean Dipole response to global
warming: the role of internal variability, Clim. Dynam., 51, 3597–3611,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4098-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-018-4098-2</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Iwakiri and Watanabe(2019)}}?><label>Iwakiri and Watanabe(2019)</label><?label iwakiri2019strengthening?><mixed-citation>Iwakiri, T. and Watanabe, M.: Strengthening of the Indian Ocean Dipole with
increasing seasonal cycle in the mid-Holocene, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
46, 8320–8328, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083088" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL083088</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jones et~al.(2018)Jones, Roberts, Steig, Cuffey, Markle, and
White}}?><label>Jones et al.(2018)Jones, Roberts, Steig, Cuffey, Markle, and
White</label><?label jones2018southern?><mixed-citation>Jones, T. R., Roberts, W. H., Steig, E. J., Cuffey, K., Markle, B., and White,
J.: Southern Hemisphere climate variability forced by Northern Hemisphere
ice-sheet topography, Nature, 554, 351–355, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24669" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature24669</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kageyama et~al.(2017)Kageyama, Albani, Braconnot, Harrison, Hopcroft,
Ivanovic, Lambert, Marti, Peltier, Peterschmitt et~al.}}?><label>Kageyama et al.(2017)Kageyama, Albani, Braconnot, Harrison, Hopcroft,
Ivanovic, Lambert, Marti, Peltier, Peterschmitt et al.</label><?label kageyama2017lgm?><mixed-citation>Kageyama, M., Albani, S., Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Hopcroft, P. O., Ivanovic, R. F., Lambert, F., Marti, O., Peltier, W. R., Peterschmitt, J.-Y., Roche, D. M., Tarasov, L., Zhang, X., Brady, E. C., Haywood, A. M., LeGrande, A. N., Lunt, D. J., Mahowald, N. M., Mikolajewicz, U., Nisancioglu, K. H., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Renssen, H., Tomas, R. A., Zhang, Q., Abe-Ouchi, A., Bartlein, P. J., Cao, J., Li, Q., Lohmann, G., Ohgaito, R., Shi, X., Volodin, E., Yoshida, K., Zhang, X., and Zheng, W.: The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 4: Scientific objectives and experimental design of the PMIP4-CMIP6 Last Glacial Maximum experiments and PMIP4 sensitivity experiments, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4035–4055, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4035-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-4035-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kageyama et~al.(2018)Kageyama, Braconnot, Harrison, Haywood,
Jungclaus, Otto-Bliesner, Abe-Ouchi, Albani, Bartlein, and
Brierley}}?><label>Kageyama et al.(2018)Kageyama, Braconnot, Harrison, Haywood,
Jungclaus, Otto-Bliesner, Abe-Ouchi, Albani, Bartlein, and
Brierley</label><?label kageyama2018pmip4?><mixed-citation>Kageyama, M., Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Haywood, A. M., Jungclaus, J. H., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Peterschmitt, J.-Y., Abe-Ouchi, A., Albani, S., Bartlein, P. J., Brierley, C., Crucifix, M., Dolan, A., Fernandez-Donado, L., Fischer, H., Hopcroft, P. O., Ivanovic, R. F., Lambert, F., Lunt, D. J., Mahowald, N. M., Peltier, W. R., Phipps, S. J., Roche, D. M., Schmidt, G. A., Tarasov, L., Valdes, P. J., Zhang, Q., and Zhou, T.: The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 1: Overview and over-arching analysis plan, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1033–1057, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1033-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-1033-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kageyama et~al.(2021)Kageyama, Harrison, Kapsch, Lofverstrom, Lora,
Mikolajewicz, Sherriff-Tadano, Vadsaria, Abe-Ouchi, Bouttes
et~al.}}?><label>Kageyama et al.(2021)Kageyama, Harrison, Kapsch, Lofverstrom, Lora,
Mikolajewicz, Sherriff-Tadano, Vadsaria, Abe-Ouchi, Bouttes
et al.</label><?label kageyama2021pmip4?><mixed-citation>Kageyama, M., Harrison, S. P., Kapsch, M.-L., Lofverstrom, M., Lora, J. M., Mikolajewicz, U., Sherriff-Tadano, S., Vadsaria, T., Abe-Ouchi, A., Bouttes, N., Chandan, D., Gregoire, L. J., Ivanovic, R. F., Izumi, K., LeGrande, A. N., Lhardy, F., Lohmann, G., Morozova, P. A., Ohgaito, R., Paul, A., Peltier, W. R., Poulsen, C. J., Quiquet, A., Roche, D. M., Shi, X., Tierney, J. E., Valdes, P. J., Volodin, E., and Zhu, J.: The PMIP4 Last Glacial Maximum experiments: preliminary results and comparison with the PMIP3 simulations, Clim. Past, 17, 1065–1089, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1065-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-17-1065-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kajtar et~al.(2017)Kajtar, Santoso, England, and
Cai}}?><label>Kajtar et al.(2017)Kajtar, Santoso, England, and
Cai</label><?label kajtar2017tropical?><mixed-citation>Kajtar, J. B., Santoso, A., England, M. H., and Cai, W.: Tropical climate
variability: interactions across the Pacific, Indian, and Atlantic Oceans,
Clim. Dynam., 48, 2173–2190, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3199-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-016-3199-z</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Leduc et~al.(2009)Leduc, Vidal, Cartapanis, and Bard}}?><label>Leduc et al.(2009)Leduc, Vidal, Cartapanis, and Bard</label><?label Leduc2009a?><mixed-citation>Leduc, G., Vidal, L., Cartapanis, O., and Bard, E.: Modes of eastern equatorial
Pacific thermocline variability: Implications for ENSO dynamics over the
last glacial period, Paleoceanography, 24, PA3202,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008PA001701" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008PA001701</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lee et~al.(2015)Lee, Chiang, and Chang}}?><label>Lee et al.(2015)Lee, Chiang, and Chang</label><?label lee2015tropical?><mixed-citation>Lee, S.-Y., Chiang, J. C., and Chang, P.: Tropical Pacific response to
continental ice sheet topography, Clim. Dynam., 44, 2429–2446,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2162-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-014-2162-0</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Li et~al.(2017)Li, Lin, and Cai}}?><label>Li et al.(2017)Li, Lin, and Cai</label><?label li2017realism?><mixed-citation>Li, Z., Lin, X., and Cai, W.: Realism of modelled Indian summer monsoon
correlation with the tropical Indo-Pacific affects projected monsoon
changes, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 1–7, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05225-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-05225-z</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liu et~al.(2014)Liu, Xie, Zheng, Li, Du, Huang, and
Yu}}?><label>Liu et al.(2014)Liu, Xie, Zheng, Li, Du, Huang, and
Yu</label><?label liu2014indian?><mixed-citation>Liu, L., Xie, S.-P., Zheng, X.-T., Li, T., Du, Y., Huang, G., and Yu, W.-D.:
Indian Ocean variability in the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble: the zonal
dipole mode, Clim. Dynam., 43, 1715–1730,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-2000-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-013-2000-9</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liu et~al.(2023)Liu, Yuan, jia Luo, Ma, Zhou, and
Yamagata}}?><label>Liu et al.(2023)Liu, Yuan, jia Luo, Ma, Zhou, and
Yamagata</label><?label Liu2023mhIOD?><mixed-citation>Liu, S., Yuan, C., jia Luo, J., Ma, X., Zhou, X., and Yamagata, T.: Weakening
of the Indian Ocean Dipole in the mid-Holocene due to the mean oceanic
climatology change, arXiv [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.31223/X5VS9H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.31223/X5VS9H</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liu et~al.(2007)Liu, Liu, Clemens, Prell, and
Kutzbach}}?><label>Liu et al.(2007)Liu, Liu, Clemens, Prell, and
Kutzbach</label><?label liu2007coupled?><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Liu, Z., Clemens, S., Prell, W., and Kutzbach, J.: A coupled model
study of glacial Asian monsoon variability and Indian ocean dipole,
J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 85, 1–10,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.85.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2151/jmsj.85.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lu et~al.(2016)Lu, Liu, and Zhu}}?><label>Lu et al.(2016)Lu, Liu, and Zhu</label><?label lu2016abrupt?><mixed-citation>Lu, Z., Liu, Z., and Zhu, J.: Abrupt intensification of ENSO forced by
deglacial ice-sheet retreat in CCSM3, Clim. Dynam., 46, 1877–1891,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2681-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-015-2681-3</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Marathe et~al.(2021)Marathe, Terray, and
Karumuri}}?><label>Marathe et al.(2021)Marathe, Terray, and
Karumuri</label><?label marathe2021tropical?><mixed-citation>Marathe, S., Terray, P., and Karumuri, A.: Tropical Indian Ocean and ENSO
relationships in a changed climate, Clim. Dynam., 56, 3255–3276,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05641-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-021-05641-y</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{McKenna et~al.(2020)McKenna, Santoso, Gupta, Taschetto, and
Cai}}?><label>McKenna et al.(2020)McKenna, Santoso, Gupta, Taschetto, and
Cai</label><?label mckenna2020indian?><mixed-citation>McKenna, S., Santoso, A., Gupta, A. S., Taschetto, A. S., and Cai, W.: Indian
Ocean Dipole in CMIP5 and CMIP6: characteristics, biases, and links to
ENSO, Sci. Rep.-UK, 10, 1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68268-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-020-68268-9</ext-link>,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ng et~al.(2014)Ng, Cai, and Walsh}}?><label>Ng et al.(2014)Ng, Cai, and Walsh</label><?label ng2014role?><mixed-citation>Ng, B., Cai, W., and Walsh, K.: The role of the SST-thermocline relationship in
Indian Ocean Dipole skewness and its response to global warming, Sci.
Rep.-UK, 4, 1–6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep06034</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ogata et~al.(2013)Ogata, Xie, Lan, and Zheng}}?><label>Ogata et al.(2013)Ogata, Xie, Lan, and Zheng</label><?label ogata2013importance?><mixed-citation>Ogata, T., Xie, S.-P., Lan, J., and Zheng, X.: Importance of ocean dynamics for
the skewness of the Indian Ocean dipole mode, J. Climate, 26,
2145–2159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-11-00615.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jcli-d-11-00615.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Otto-Bliesner et~al.(2017)Otto-Bliesner, Braconnot, Harrison, Lunt,
Abe-Ouchi, Albani, Bartlein, Capron, Carlson, Dutton et~al.}}?><label>Otto-Bliesner et al.(2017)Otto-Bliesner, Braconnot, Harrison, Lunt,
Abe-Ouchi, Albani, Bartlein, Capron, Carlson, Dutton et al.</label><?label otto2017pmip4?><mixed-citation>Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Lunt, D. J., Abe-Ouchi, A., Albani, S., Bartlein, P. J., Capron, E., Carlson, A. E., Dutton, A., Fischer, H., Goelzer, H., Govin, A., Haywood, A., Joos, F., LeGrande, A. N., Lipscomb, W. H., Lohmann, G., Mahowald, N., Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Pausata, F. S. R., Peterschmitt, J.-Y., Phipps, S. J., Renssen, H., and Zhang, Q.: The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 2: Two interglacials, scientific objective and experimental design for Holocene and Last Interglacial simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3979–4003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3979-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-3979-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Otto-Bliesner et~al.(2021)Otto-Bliesner, Brady, Zhao, Brierley,
Axford, Capron, Govin, Hoffman, Isaacs, Kageyama, Scussolini, Tzedakis,
Williams, Wolff, Abe-Ouchi, Braconnot, Ramos~Buarque, Cao, de~Vernal,
Guarino, Guo, LeGrande, Lohmann, Meissner, Menviel, Nisancioglu, O'ishi,
Salas Y~Melia, Shi, Sicard, Sime, Tomas, Volodin, Yeung, Zhang, Zhang, and
Zheng}}?><label>Otto-Bliesner et al.(2021)Otto-Bliesner, Brady, Zhao, Brierley,
Axford, Capron, Govin, Hoffman, Isaacs, Kageyama, Scussolini, Tzedakis,
Williams, Wolff, Abe-Ouchi, Braconnot, Ramos Buarque, Cao, de Vernal,
Guarino, Guo, LeGrande, Lohmann, Meissner, Menviel, Nisancioglu, O'ishi,
Salas Y Melia, Shi, Sicard, Sime, Tomas, Volodin, Yeung, Zhang, Zhang, and
Zheng</label><?label otto2021lig127k?><mixed-citation>Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Brady, E. C., Zhao, A., Brierley, C. M., Axford, Y., Capron, E., Govin, A., Hoffman, J. S., Isaacs, E., Kageyama, M., Scussolini, P., Tzedakis, P. C., Williams, C. J. R., Wolff, E., Abe-Ouchi, A., Braconnot, P., Ramos Buarque, S., Cao, J., de Vernal, A., Guarino, M. V., Guo, C., LeGrande, A. N., Lohmann, G., Meissner, K. J., Menviel, L., Morozova, P. A., Nisancioglu, K. H., O'ishi, R., Salas y Mélia, D., Shi, X., Sicard, M., Sime, L., Stepanek, C., Tomas, R., Volodin, E., Yeung, N. K. H., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Z., and Zheng, W.: Large-scale features of Last Interglacial climate: results from evaluating the lig127k simulations for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6)–Paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project (PMIP4), Clim. Past, 17, 63–94, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-63-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-17-63-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page700?><ref id="bib1.bibx66"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Perez-Sanz et~al.(2014)Perez-Sanz, Li, Gonz{\'{a}}lez-Samp{\'{e}}riz, and
Harrison}}?><label>Perez-Sanz et al.(2014)Perez-Sanz, Li, González-Sampériz, and
Harrison</label><?label perez2014evaluation?><mixed-citation>Perez-Sanz, A., Li, G., González-Sampériz, P., and Harrison, S. P.: Evaluation of modern and mid-Holocene seasonal precipitation of the Mediterranean and northern Africa in the CMIP5 simulations, Clim. Past, 10, 551–568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-551-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-10-551-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Phillips et~al.(2014)Phillips, Deser, and
Fasullo}}?><label>Phillips et al.(2014)Phillips, Deser, and
Fasullo</label><?label phillips2014evaluating?><mixed-citation>Phillips, A. S., Deser, C., and Fasullo, J.: Evaluating modes of variability in
climate models, Eos T. Am. Geophys. Un., 95, 453–455,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EO490002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014EO490002</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Power and Delage(2018)}}?><label>Power and Delage(2018)</label><?label power2018nino?><mixed-citation>Power, S. B. and Delage, F. P.: El Niño–Southern Oscillation and
associated climatic conditions around the world during the latter half of the
twenty-first century, J. Climate, 31, 6189–6207,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0138.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0138.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Qu and Huang(2012)}}?><label>Qu and Huang(2012)</label><?label qu2012impacts?><mixed-citation>Qu, X. and Huang, G.: Impacts of tropical Indian Ocean SST on the meridional
displacement of East Asian jet in boreal summer, Int. J.
Climatol., 32, 2073–2080, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2378" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.2378</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rayner et~al.(2003)Rayner, Parker, Horton, Folland, Alexander,
Rowell, Kent, and Kaplan}}?><label>Rayner et al.(2003)Rayner, Parker, Horton, Folland, Alexander,
Rowell, Kent, and Kaplan</label><?label rayner2003hadisst?><mixed-citation>Rayner, N., Parker, D. E., Horton, E., Folland, C. K., Alexander, L. V.,
Rowell, D., Kent, E. C., and Kaplan, A.: Global analyses of sea surface
temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late
nineteenth century, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4407,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002670</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rehfeld et~al.(2020)Rehfeld, H\'{e}bert, Lora, Lofverstrom, and
Brierley}}?><label>Rehfeld et al.(2020)Rehfeld, Hébert, Lora, Lofverstrom, and
Brierley</label><?label rehfeld2020variability?><mixed-citation>Rehfeld, K., Hébert, R., Lora, J. M., Lofverstrom, M., and Brierley, C. M.: Variability of surface climate in simulations of past and future, Earth Syst. Dynam., 11, 447–468, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-447-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esd-11-447-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Saji et~al.(1999)Saji, Goswami, Vinayachandran, and
Yamagata}}?><label>Saji et al.(1999)Saji, Goswami, Vinayachandran, and
Yamagata</label><?label saji1999dipole?><mixed-citation>Saji, N., Goswami, B. N., Vinayachandran, P., and Yamagata, T.: A dipole mode
in the tropical Indian Ocean, Nature, 401, 360–363, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/43854" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/43854</ext-link>,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schott et~al.(2009)Schott, Xie, and McCreary~Jr}}?><label>Schott et al.(2009)Schott, Xie, and McCreary Jr</label><?label schott2009indian?><mixed-citation>Schott, F. A., Xie, S.-P., and McCreary Jr, J. P.: Indian Ocean circulation and
climate variability, Rev. Geophys., 47, RG1002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000245" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007RG000245</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Slivinski et~al.(2019)Slivinski, Compo, Whitaker, Sardeshmukh, Giese,
McColl, Allan, Yin, Vose, Titchner et~al.}}?><label>Slivinski et al.(2019)Slivinski, Compo, Whitaker, Sardeshmukh, Giese,
McColl, Allan, Yin, Vose, Titchner et al.</label><?label slivinski2019towards?><mixed-citation>Slivinski, L. C., Gilbert P. Compo, G. P., Whitaker, J. S., Sardeshmukh, P. D., Giese, B., S., McColl, C., Allan, R., Yin, X., Vose, R., Titchner, H., Kennedy, J., Spencer, L. J., Ashcroft, L., Brönnimann, S., Brunet, M., Camuffo, D., Cornes, R., Cram, T. A., Crouthamel, R., Domínguez-Castro, F., Freeman, J. E., Gergis, J.,  Hawkins, E., Philip D. Jones, P. D., Jourdain, S., Kaplan, A., Kubota, H., Le Blancq, F., Lee, T.-C., Lorrey, A., Luterbacher, J., Maugeri, M., Mock, C. J., Moore, G. W. K., Przybylak, R., Pudmenzky, C., Reason, C., Slonosky, V. C., Smith, C. A., Tinz, B., Trewin, B., Valente, M. A., Wang, X. L., Wilkinson, C., Wood, K., and Wyszyński, P.:
Towards a more reliable historical reanalysis: Improvements for version 3 of
the Twentieth Century Reanalysis system, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 145, 2876–2908, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3598" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3598</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Slivinski et al.(2023)}?><label>Slivinski et al.(2023)</label><?label Slivinski?><mixed-citation>Slivinski, L., Compo, G., Whitaker, J., and Sardeshmukh, P.: NOAA-CIRES Twentieth Century Reanalysis (V3), Physical Sciences Laboratory,   <uri>https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.20thC_ReanV3.html</uri>, last access: 13 February 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Stevenson et~al.(2021)Stevenson, Wittenberg, Fasullo, Coats, and
Otto-Bliesner}}?><label>Stevenson et al.(2021)Stevenson, Wittenberg, Fasullo, Coats, and
Otto-Bliesner</label><?label stevenson2021understanding?><mixed-citation>Stevenson, S., Wittenberg, A. T., Fasullo, J., Coats, S., and Otto-Bliesner,
B.: Understanding diverse model projections of future extreme El Niño,
J. Climate, 34, 449–464, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-19-0969.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jcli-d-19-0969.1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Stuecker et~al.(2017)Stuecker, Timmermann, Jin, Chikamoto, Zhang,
Wittenberg, Widiasih, and Zhao}}?><label>Stuecker et al.(2017)Stuecker, Timmermann, Jin, Chikamoto, Zhang,
Wittenberg, Widiasih, and Zhao</label><?label stuecker2017revisiting?><mixed-citation>Stuecker, M. F., Timmermann, A., Jin, F.-F., Chikamoto, Y., Zhang, W.,
Wittenberg, A. T., Widiasih, E., and Zhao, S.: Revisiting ENSO/Indian Ocean
dipole phase relationships, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2481–2492,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072308" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL072308</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tao et~al.(2015)Tao, Huang, Hu, Qu, Wen, and
Gong}}?><label>Tao et al.(2015)Tao, Huang, Hu, Qu, Wen, and
Gong</label><?label tao2015interdecadal?><mixed-citation>Tao, W., Huang, G., Hu, K., Qu, X., Wen, G., and Gong, H.: Interdecadal
modulation of ENSO teleconnections to the Indian Ocean Basin Mode and their
relationship under global warming in CMIP5 models, Int. J.
Climatol., 35, 391–407, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3987" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.3987</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tao et~al.(2016)Tao, Huang, Hu, Gong, Wen, and Liu}}?><label>Tao et al.(2016)Tao, Huang, Hu, Gong, Wen, and Liu</label><?label tao2016study?><mixed-citation>Tao, W., Huang, G., Hu, K., Gong, H., Wen, G., and Liu, L.: A study of biases
in simulation of the Indian Ocean basin mode and its capacitor effect in
CMIP3/CMIP5 models, Clim. Dynam., 46, 205–226,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2579-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-015-2579-0</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Thirumalai et~al.(2019)Thirumalai, DiNezio, Tierney, Puy, and
Mohtadi}}?><label>Thirumalai et al.(2019)Thirumalai, DiNezio, Tierney, Puy, and
Mohtadi</label><?label thirumalai2019nino?><mixed-citation>Thirumalai, K., DiNezio, P. N., Tierney, J. E., Puy, M., and Mohtadi, M.: An El
Niño mode in the glacial indian ocean?, Paleoceanography and
Paleoclimatology, 34, 1316–1327, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003669" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019PA003669</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tierney et~al.(2020)Tierney, Zhu, King, Malevich, Hakim, and
Poulsen}}?><label>Tierney et al.(2020)Tierney, Zhu, King, Malevich, Hakim, and
Poulsen</label><?label tierney2020glacial?><mixed-citation>Tierney, J. E., Zhu, J., King, J., Malevich, S. B., Hakim, G. J., and Poulsen,
C. J.: Glacial cooling and climate sensitivity revisited, Nature, 584,
569–573, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2617-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-020-2617-x</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Trenberth(1997)}}?><label>Trenberth(1997)</label><?label trenberth1997definition?><mixed-citation>Trenberth, K. E.: The definition of El Niño, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2771–2778,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078&lt;2771:TDOENO&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078&lt;2771:TDOENO&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ullman et~al.(2014)Ullman, LeGrande, Carlson, Anslow, and
Licciardi}}?><label>Ullman et al.(2014)Ullman, LeGrande, Carlson, Anslow, and
Licciardi</label><?label ullman2014assessing?><mixed-citation>Ullman, D. J., LeGrande, A. N., Carlson, A. E., Anslow, F. S., and Licciardi, J. M.: Assessing the impact of Laurentide Ice Sheet topography on glacial climate, Clim. Past, 10, 487–507, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-487-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-10-487-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vecchi and Soden(2007)}}?><label>Vecchi and Soden(2007)</label><?label vecchi2007global?><mixed-citation>Vecchi, G. A. and Soden, B. J.: Global warming and the weakening of the
tropical circulation, J. Climate, 20, 4316–4340,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4258.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI4258.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wainwright et~al.(2021)Wainwright, Finney, Kilavi, Black, and
Marsham}}?><label>Wainwright et al.(2021)Wainwright, Finney, Kilavi, Black, and
Marsham</label><?label wainwright2021extreme?><mixed-citation>Wainwright, C. M., Finney, D. L., Kilavi, M., Black, E., and Marsham, J. H.:
Extreme rainfall in East Africa, October 2019–January 2020 and context
under future climate change, Weather, 76, 26–31,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.3824" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wea.3824</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wang(2019)}}?><label>Wang(2019)</label><?label wang2019three?><mixed-citation>Wang, C.: Three-ocean interactions and climate variability: a review and
perspective, Clim. Dynam., 53, 5119–5136,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04930-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-019-04930-x</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wang and Cai(2020)}}?><label>Wang and Cai(2020)</label><?label wang2020two?><mixed-citation>Wang, G. and Cai, W.: Two-year consecutive concurrences of positive Indian
Ocean Dipole and Central Pacific El Niño preconditioned the 2019/2020
Australian “black summer” bushfires, Geosci. Lett., 7, 1–9,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-020-00168-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40562-020-00168-2</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wang et~al.(2021)Wang, Cai, and Santoso}}?><label>Wang et al.(2021)Wang, Cai, and Santoso</label><?label wang2021simulated?><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Cai, W., and Santoso, A.: Simulated thermocline tilt over the
tropical Indian Ocean and its influence on future sea surface temperature
variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL091902,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091902" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL091902</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wang et~al.(2016)Wang, Murtugudde, and Kumar}}?><label>Wang et al.(2016)Wang, Murtugudde, and Kumar</label><?label wang2016evolution?><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Murtugudde, R., and Kumar, A.: Evolution of Indian Ocean dipole and
its forcing mechanisms in the absence of ENSO, Clim. Dynam., 47,
2481–2500, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-2977-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-016-2977-y</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Waskom(2021)}}?><label>Waskom(2021)</label><?label Waskom2021?><mixed-citation>Waskom, M. L.: Seaborn: statistical data visualization, Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3021, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.21105/joss.03021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Webster et~al.(1999)Webster, Moore, Loschnigg, and
Leben}}?><label>Webster et al.(1999)Webster, Moore, Loschnigg, and
Leben</label><?label webster1999coupled?><mixed-citation>Webster, P. J., Moore, A. M., Loschnigg, J. P., and Leben, R. R.: Coupled
ocean–atmosphere dynamics in the Indian Ocean during 1997–98, Nature,
401, 356–360, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/43848" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/43848</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wyrtki(1989)}}?><label>Wyrtki(1989)</label><?label wyrtki1989some?><mixed-citation>Wyrtki, K.: Some thoughts about the west Pacific warm pool, in: Proceedings
of the western pacific international meeting and workshop on TOGA COARE,
ORSTOM/Nouméa New Caledonia, 99–109, <uri>https://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/doc34-08/30199.pdf</uri>
(last access: 13 February 2023), 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Xu et~al.(2021)Xu, Wang, and Yu}}?><label>Xu et al.(2021)Xu, Wang, and Yu</label><?label xu2021unique?><mixed-citation>Xu, X., Wang, L., and Yu, W.: The uniqu<?pagebreak page701?>e mean seasonal cycle in the Indian
Ocean anchors its various air-sea coupled modes across the basin, Sci.
Rep.-UK, 11, 1–8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84936-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-021-84936-w</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yeung et~al.(2021)Yeung, Menviel, Meissner, Taschetto, Ziehn, and
Chamberlain}}?><label>Yeung et al.(2021)Yeung, Menviel, Meissner, Taschetto, Ziehn, and
Chamberlain</label><?label yeung2021land?><mixed-citation>Yeung, N. K.-H., Menviel, L., Meissner, K. J., Taschetto, A. S., Ziehn, T., and Chamberlain, M.: Land–sea temperature contrasts at the Last Interglacial and their impact on the hydrological cycle, Clim. Past, 17, 869–885, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-869-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-17-869-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Zelinka et al.(2020)}?><label>Zelinka et al.(2020)</label><?label zelinka2020causes?><mixed-citation>Zelinka, M. D., Myers, T. A., McCoy, D. T., Po-Chedley, S., Caldwell, P. M., Ceppi, P., Klein, S. A., and Taylor, K. E.: Causes of higher climate sensitivity in CMIP6 models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL085782</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zhang et~al.(2021)Zhang, Wang, Newman, and
Han}}?><label>Zhang et al.(2021)Zhang, Wang, Newman, and
Han</label><?label zhang2021interannual?><mixed-citation>Zhang, L., Wang, G., Newman, M., and Han, W.: Interannual to decadal
variability of tropical Indian Ocean sea surface temperature: Pacific
influence versus local internal variability, J. Climate, 34,
2669–2684, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-20-0807.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jcli-d-20-0807.1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zhang et~al.(2020)Zhang, Li, Zhao, Zheng, Feng, Li, and
Xu}}?><label>Zhang et al.(2020)Zhang, Li, Zhao, Zheng, Feng, Li, and
Xu</label><?label zhang2020indian?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Li, J., Zhao, S., Zheng, F., Feng, J., Li, Y., and Xu, Y.: Indian
Ocean tripole mode and its associated atmospheric and oceanic processes,
Clim. Dynam., 55, 1367–1383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05331-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-020-05331-1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zhao et~al.(2022)Zhao, Brierley, Jiang, Eyles, Oyarz{\'{u}}n, and
Gomez-Dans}}?><label>Zhao et al.(2022)Zhao, Brierley, Jiang, Eyles, Oyarzún, and
Gomez-Dans</label><?label zhao2022analysing?><mixed-citation>Zhao, A., Brierley, C. M., Jiang, Z., Eyles, R., Oyarzún, D., and Gomez-Dans, J.: Analysing the PMIP4-CMIP6 collection: a workflow and tool (pmip_p2fvar_analyzer v1), Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2475–2488, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2475-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-15-2475-2022</ext-link>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zheng(2019)}}?><label>Zheng(2019)</label><?label zheng2019indo?><mixed-citation>Zheng, X.-T.: Indo-pacific climate modes in warming climate: consensus and
uncertainty across model projections, Current Climate Change Reports, 5,
308–321, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-019-00152-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40641-019-00152-9</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zheng et~al.(2011)Zheng, Xie, and Liu}}?><label>Zheng et al.(2011)Zheng, Xie, and Liu</label><?label zheng2011response?><mixed-citation>Zheng, X.-T., Xie, S.-P., and Liu, Q.: Response of the Indian Ocean basin
mode and its capacitor effect to global warming, J. Climate, 24,
6146–6164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4169.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2011JCLI4169.1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zheng et~al.(2013)Zheng, Xie, Du, Liu, Huang, and
Liu}}?><label>Zheng et al.(2013)Zheng, Xie, Du, Liu, Huang, and
Liu</label><?label zheng2013indian?><mixed-citation>Zheng, X.-T., Xie, S.-P., Du, Y., Liu, L., Huang, G., and Liu, Q.: Indian Ocean
dipole response to global warming in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble, J.
Climate, 26, 6067–6080, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00638.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00638.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zheng et~al.(2021)Zheng, Lu, and Hui}}?><label>Zheng et al.(2021)Zheng, Lu, and Hui</label><?label zheng2021response?><mixed-citation>Zheng, X.-T., Lu, J., and Hui, C.: Response of seasonal phase locking of
Indian Ocean Dipole to global warming, Clim. Dynam., 57, 2737–2751,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05834-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-021-05834-5</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ziegler et~al.(2010)Ziegler, Tuenter, and
Lourens}}?><label>Ziegler et al.(2010)Ziegler, Tuenter, and
Lourens</label><?label ziegler2010precession?><mixed-citation>Ziegler, M., Tuenter, E., and Lourens, L. J.: The precession phase of the
boreal summer monsoon as viewed from the eastern Mediterranean (ODP Site
968), Quaternary Sci. Rev., 29, 1481–1490,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.03.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.03.011</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Indian Ocean variability changes in the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Abram et al.(2007)Abram, Gagan, Liu, Hantoro, McCulloch, and
Suwargadi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Abram, N. J., Gagan, M. K., Liu, Z., Hantoro, W. S., McCulloch, M. T., and
Suwargadi, B. W.: Seasonal characteristics of the Indian Ocean Dipole during
the Holocene epoch, Nature, 445, 299–302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05477" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05477</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Abram et al.(2020a)Abram, Hargreaves, Wright,
Thirumalai, Ummenhofer, and England</label><mixed-citation>
      
Abram, N. J., Hargreaves, J. A., Wright, N. M., Thirumalai, K., Ummenhofer,
C. C., and England, M. H.: Palaeoclimate perspectives on the Indian Ocean
dipole, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 237, 106302,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106302" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106302</a>, 2020a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Abram et al.(2020b)Abram, Wright, Ellis, Dixon, Wurtzel,
England, Ummenhofer, Philibosian, Cahyarini, Yu, Shen, Cheng, Edwards, and
Heslop</label><mixed-citation>
      
Abram, N. J., Wright, N. M., Ellis, B., Dixon, B. C., Wurtzel, J. B., England,
M. H., Ummenhofer, C. C., Philibosian, B., Cahyarini, S. Y., Yu, T.-L., Shen,
C.-C., Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., and Heslop, D.: Coupling of Indo-Pacific
climate variability over the last millennium, Nature, 579, 385–392,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2084-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2084-4</a>, 2020b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Ashok et al.(2001)Ashok, Guan, and Yamagata</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ashok, K., Guan, Z., and Yamagata, T.: Impact of the Indian Ocean dipole on the
relationship between the Indian monsoon rainfall and ENSO, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 28, 4499–4502, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013294" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013294</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Ashok et al.(2003)Ashok, Guan, and Yamagata</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ashok, K., Guan, Z., and Yamagata, T.: A look at the relationship between the
ENSO and the Indian Ocean dipole, J. Meteorol. Soc.
Jpn. Ser. II, 81, 41–56, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.81.41" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.81.41</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bartlein and Shafer(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bartlein, P. J. and Shafer, S. L.: Paleo calendar-effect adjustments in time-slice and transient climate-model simulations (PaleoCalAdjust v1.0): impact and strategies for data analysis, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3889–3913, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3889-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3889-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Behera and Yamagata(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Behera, S. K. and Yamagata, T.: Subtropical SST dipole events in the southern
Indian Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 327–330,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL011451" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL011451</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Behera et al.(2006)Behera, Luo, Masson, Rao, Sakuma, and
Yamagata</label><mixed-citation>
      
Behera, S. K., Luo, J. J., Masson, S., Rao, S. A., Sakuma, H., and Yamagata,
T.: A CGCM study on the interaction between IOD and ENSO, J.
Climate, 19, 1688–1705, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3797.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3797.1</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Berger and Loutre(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berger, A. and Loutre, M.-F.: Insolation values for the climate of the last 10
million years, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 10, 297–317,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-3791(91)90033-q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-3791(91)90033-q</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Braconnot et al.(2007)Braconnot, Otto-Bliesner, Harrison, Joussaume,
Peterchmitt, Abe-Ouchi, Crucifix, Driesschaert, Fichefet, Hewitt
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Braconnot, P., Otto-Bliesner, B., Harrison, S., Joussaume, S., Peterchmitt, J.-Y., Abe-Ouchi, A., Crucifix, M., Driesschaert, E., Fichefet, Th., Hewitt, C. D., Kageyama, M., Kitoh, A., Laîné, A., Loutre, M.-F., Marti, O., Merkel, U., Ramstein, G., Valdes, P., Weber, S. L., Yu, Y., and Zhao, Y.: Results of PMIP2 coupled simulations of the Mid-Holocene and Last Glacial Maximum – Part 1: experiments and large-scale features, Clim. Past, 3, 261–277, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-3-261-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-3-261-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Braconnot et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Kageyama, M., Bartlein, P. J., Masson-Delmotte, V., Abe-Ouchi, A., Otto-Bliesner, B., and Zhao, Y.: Evaluation of climate models using palaeoclimatic data, Nat. Clim. Change, 2, 417–424, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Brierley(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brierley, C.:  pmip4/IndianOceanVariability: v1.1 (v1.1), Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7636502" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7636502</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Brierley and Wainer(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brierley, C. and Wainer, I.: Inter-annual variability in the tropical Atlantic from the Last Glacial Maximum into future climate projections simulated by CMIP5/PMIP3, Clim. Past, 14, 1377–1390, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1377-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1377-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Brierley et al.(2020)Brierley, Zhao, Harrison, Braconnot, Williams,
Thornalley, Shi, Peterschmitt, Ohgaito, Kaufman, Kageyama, Hargreaves, Erb,
Emile-Geay, D'Agostino, Chandan, Carré, Bartlein, Zheng, Zhang, Zhang,
Yang, Volodin, Tomas, Routson, Peltier, Otto-Bliesner, Morozova, McKay,
Lohmann, Legrande, Guo, Cao, Brady, Annan, and
Abe-Ouchi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brierley, C. M., Zhao, A., Harrison, S. P., Braconnot, P., Williams, C. J. R., Thornalley, D. J. R., Shi, X., Peterschmitt, J.-Y., Ohgaito, R., Kaufman, D. S., Kageyama, M., Hargreaves, J. C., Erb, M. P., Emile-Geay, J., D'Agostino, R., Chandan, D., Carré, M., Bartlein, P. J., Zheng, W., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Q., Yang, H., Volodin, E. M., Tomas, R. A., Routson, C., Peltier, W. R., Otto-Bliesner, B., Morozova, P. A., McKay, N. P., Lohmann, G., Legrande, A. N., Guo, C., Cao, J., Brady, E., Annan, J. D., and Abe-Ouchi, A.: Large-scale features and evaluation of the PMIP4-CMIP6 midHolocene simulations, Clim. Past, 16, 1847–1872, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1847-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1847-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Brown et al.(2009)Brown, Lynch, and Marshall</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brown, J., Lynch, A. H., and Marshall, A. G.: Variability of the Indian Ocean
Dipole in coupled model paleoclimate simulations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 114, D11105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010346" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010346</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Brown et al.(2020)Brown, Brierley, An, Guarino, Stevenson, Williams,
Zhang, Zhao, Abe-Ouchi, Braconnot, Brady, Chandan, D'Agostino, Guo, LeGrande,
Lohmann, Morozova, Ohgaito, O'ishi, Otto-Bliesner, Peltier, Shi, Sime,
Volodin, Zhang, and Zheng</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brown, J. R., Brierley, C. M., An, S.-I., Guarino, M.-V., Stevenson, S., Williams, C. J. R., Zhang, Q., Zhao, A., Abe-Ouchi, A., Braconnot, P., Brady, E. C., Chandan, D., D'Agostino, R., Guo, C., LeGrande, A. N., Lohmann, G., Morozova, P. A., Ohgaito, R., O'ishi, R., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Peltier, W. R., Shi, X., Sime, L., Volodin, E. M., Zhang, Z., and Zheng, W.: Comparison of past and future simulations of ENSO in CMIP5/PMIP3 and CMIP6/PMIP4 models, Clim. Past, 16, 1777–1805, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1777-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1777-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Cai et al.(2013)Cai, Zheng, Weller, Collins, Cowan, Lengaigne, Yu,
and Yamagata</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cai, W., Zheng, X.-T., Weller, E., Collins, M., Cowan, T., Lengaigne, M., Yu,
W., and Yamagata, T.: Projected response of the Indian Ocean Dipole to
greenhouse warming, Nat. Geosci., 6, 999–1007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2009</a>,
2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Cai et al.(2014)Cai, Santoso, Wang, Weller, Wu, Ashok, Masumoto, and
Yamagata</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cai, W., Santoso, A., Wang, G., Weller, E., Wu, L., Ashok, K., Masumoto, Y.,
and Yamagata, T.: Increased frequency of extreme Indian Ocean Dipole events
due to greenhouse warming, Nature, 510, 254–258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13327" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13327</a>,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Cai et al.(2021a)Cai, Santoso, Collins, Dewitte,
Karamperidou, Kug, Lengaigne, McPhaden, Stuecker, Taschetto
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cai, W., Santoso, A., Collins, M., Dewitte, B., Karamperidou, C., Kug, J.-S., Lengaigne, M., McPhaden, M. J.,  Stuecker, M. F., Taschetto, A. S., Timmermann, A., Wu, L., Yeh, S.-W., Wang, G., Ng, B., Jia, F., Yang, Y., Ying, J.,  Zheng, X.-T., Bayr, T., Brown, J. R., Capotondi, A., Cobb, K. M., Gan, B., Geng, T., Ham, Y.-G., Jin, F.-F., Jo, H.-S., Li, X.,  Lin, X., McGregor, S., Park, J.-H., Stein, K., Yang, K., Zhang, L., and Zhong, W.:
Changing El Niño–Southern Oscillation in a warming climate, Nature
Reviews Earth &amp; Environment, 2, 628–644, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00199-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00199-z</a>,
2021a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Cai et al.(2021b)Cai, Yang, Wu, Huang, Santoso, Ng,
Wang, and Yamagata</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cai, W., Yang, K., Wu, L., Huang, G., Santoso, A., Ng, B., Wang, G., and
Yamagata, T.: Opposite response of strong and moderate positive Indian Ocean
Dipole to global warming, Nat. Clim. Change, 11, 27–32,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00943-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00943-1</a>, 2021b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Cassou et al.(2021)Cassou, Cherchi, Kosaka, Corti, Engelbrecht, Lee,
Maycock, McGregor, Morgenstern, H.C., Rivera, Trewin, and
Phillips</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cassou, C., Cherchi, A., Kosaka, Y., Corti, S., Engelbrecht, F., Lee, J.-Y.,
Maycock, A., McGregor, S., Morgenstern, O., Nnamchi, H. C., Rivera, J., Trewin, B.,
and Phillips, A.: Modes of Variability, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical
Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by:
Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger,
S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K.,
Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O.,
Yu, R., and Zhou, B., book section Annex IV, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,
<a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_AnnexIV.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 13 February 2023),
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Cherchi et al.(2021)Cherchi, Terray, Ratna, Sankar, Sooraj, and
Behera</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cherchi, A., Terray, P., Ratna, S. B., Sankar, S., Sooraj, K., and Behera, S.:
Indian ocean dipole influence on Indian summer monsoon and ENSO: a
review, Indian Summer Monsoon Variability, El-Nino Teleconnections and Beyond, 157–182,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-822402-1.00011-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-822402-1.00011-9</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Collins et al.(2010)Collins, An, Cai, Ganachaud, Guilyardi, Jin,
Jochum, Lengaigne, Power, Timmermann et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Collins, M., An, S. I., Cai, W. J., Ganachaud, A., Guilyardi, E., Jin, F. F., Jochum, M., Lengaigne, M., Power, S., Timmermann, A., Vecchi, G., and Wittenberg, A.: The impact of
global warming on the tropical Pacific Ocean and El Niño, Nat.
Geosci., 3, 391–397, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo868" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo868</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Collins et al.(2013)Collins, Knutti, Arblaster, Dufresne, Fichefet,
Friedlingstein, Gao, Gutowski, Johns, Krinner, Shongwe, Tebaldi, Weaver, and
Wehner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Collins, M., Knutti, R., Arblaster, J., Dufresne, J.-L., Fichefet, T.,
Friedlingstein, P., Gao, X., Gutowski, W. J., Johns, T., Krinner, G.,
Shongwe, M., Tebaldi, C., Weaver, A., and Wehner, M.: Long-term climate
change: projections, commitments and irreversibility, in: Climate Change
2013-The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by:
Stocker, T., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S., Boschung, J.,
Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P.,  Cambridge
University Press, 1029–1136, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.024</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Compo et al.(2011)Compo, Whitaker, Sardeshmukh, Matsui, Allan, Yin,
Gleason, Vose, Rutledge, Bessemoulin, Brönnimann, Brunet, Crouthamel, Grant,
Groisman, Jones, Kruk, Kruger, Marshall, Maugeri, Mok, Nordli, Ross, Trigo,
Wang, Woodruff, and Worley</label><mixed-citation>
      
Compo, G. P., Whitaker, J. S., Sardeshmukh, P. D., Matsui, N., Allan, R. J.,
Yin, X., Gleason, B. E., Vose, R. S., Rutledge, G., Bessemoulin, P.,
Brönnimann, S., Brunet, M., Crouthamel, R. I., Grant, A. N., Groisman,
P. Y., Jones, P. D., Kruk, M. C., Kruger, A. C., Marshall, G. J., Maugeri,
M., Mok, H. Y., Nordli, Ø., Ross, T. F., Trigo, R. M., Wang, X. L.,
Woodruff, S. D., and Worley, S. J.: The twentieth century reanalysis project,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 1–28,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.776" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.776</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Cowan et al.(2015)Cowan, Cai, Ng, and England</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cowan, T., Cai, W., Ng, B., and England, M.: The response of the Indian Ocean
dipole asymmetry to anthropogenic aerosols and greenhouse gases, J.
Climate, 28, 2564–2583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00661.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00661.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>D'Agostino et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
D'Agostino, R., Bader, J., Bordoni, S., Ferreira, D., and Jungclaus, J.: Northern Hemisphere Monsoon Response to Mid-Holocene Orbital Forcing and Greenhouse Gas-Induced Global Warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 1591–1601, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081589" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081589</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Di Nezio et al.(2016)Di Nezio, Timmermann, Tierney, Jin,
Otto-Bliesner, Rosenbloom, Mapes, Neale, Ivanovic, and
Montenegro</label><mixed-citation>
      
Di Nezio, P. N., Timmermann, A., Tierney, J. E., Jin, F.-F., Otto-Bliesner, B.,
Rosenbloom, N., Mapes, B., Neale, R., Ivanovic, R. F., and Montenegro, A.:
The climate response of the Indo-Pacific warm pool to glacial sea level,
Paleoceanography, 31, 866–894, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015PA002890" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015PA002890</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>DiNezio and Tierney(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
DiNezio, P. N. and Tierney, J. E.: The effect of sea level on glacial
Indo-Pacific climate, Nat. Geosci., 6, 485–491, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1823" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1823</a>,
2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>DiNezio et al.(2018)DiNezio, Tierney, Otto-Bliesner, Timmermann,
Bhattacharya, Rosenbloom, and Brady</label><mixed-citation>
      
DiNezio, P. N., Tierney, J. E., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Timmermann, A.,
Bhattacharya, T., Rosenbloom, N., and Brady, E.: Glacial changes in tropical
climate amplified by the Indian Ocean, Science Advances, 4, eaat9658,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat9658" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat9658</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>DiNezio et al.(2020)DiNezio, Puy, Thirumalai, Jin, and
Tierney</label><mixed-citation>
      
DiNezio, P. N., Puy, M., Thirumalai, K., Jin, F.-F., and Tierney, J. E.:
Emergence of an equatorial mode of climate variability in the Indian Ocean,
Science Advances, 6, eaay7684, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay7684" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay7684</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Eyring et al.(2016a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016</a>, 2016a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Eyring et al.(2016b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eyring, V., Righi, M., Lauer, A., Evaldsson, M., Wenzel, S., Jones, C., Anav, A., Andrews, O., Cionni, I., Davin, E. L., Deser, C., Ehbrecht, C., Friedlingstein, P., Gleckler, P., Gottschaldt, K.-D., Hagemann, S., Juckes, M., Kindermann, S., Krasting, J., Kunert, D., Levine, R., Loew, A., Mäkelä, J., Martin, G., Mason, E., Phillips, A. S., Read, S., Rio, C., Roehrig, R., Senftleben, D., Sterl, A., van Ulft, L. H., Walton, J., Wang, S., and Williams, K. D.: ESMValTool (v1.0) – a community diagnostic and performance metrics tool for routine evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1747–1802, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1747-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1747-2016</a>, 2016b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Eyring et al.(2021)Eyring, Gillett, Achuta Rao, Barimalala,
Barreiro Parrillo, Bellouin, Cassou, Durack, Kosaka, McGregor, Min,
Morgenstern, and Sun</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eyring, V., Gillett, N. P., Achuta Rao, K. M., Barimalala, R.,
Barreiro Parrillo, M., Bellouin, N., Cassou, C., Durack, P. J., Kosaka, Y.,
McGregor, S., Min, S., Morgenstern, O., and Sun, Y.: Human Influence on the
Climate System, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis.
Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V.,
Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen,
Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E.,
Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and
Zhou, B., chap. 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United
<a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Chapter_03.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 13 February 2023),
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Flato et al.(2013)Flato, Marotzke, Abiodun, Braconnot, Chou, Collins,
Cox, Driouech, Emori, Eyring, Forest, Gleckler, Guilyardi, Jakob, Kattsov,
Reason, Rummukainen, AchutaRao, Anav, Andrews, Baehr, Bindoff, Bodas-Salcedo,
Catto, Chambers, Chang, Dai, Deser, Doblas-Reyes, Durack, Eby, de Elia,
Fichefet, Forster, Frame, Fyfe, Gbobaniyi, Gillett, González-Rouco, Goodess,
Griffies, Hall, Harrison, Hense, Hunke, Ilyina, Ivanova, Johnson, Kageyama,
Kharin, Klein, Knight, Knutti, Landerer, Lee, Li, Mahowald, Mears, Meehl,
Morice, Msadek, Myhre, Neelin, Painter, Pavlova, Perlwitz, Peterschmitt,
Räisänen, Rauser, Reid, Rodwell, Santer, Scaife, Schulz, Scinocca, Sexton,
Shindell, Shiogama, Sillmann, Simmons, Sperber, Stephenson, Stevens, Stott,
Sutton, Thorne, van Oldenborgh, Vecchi, Webb, Williams, Woollings, Xie, and
Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Flato, G., Marotzke, J., Abiodun, B., Braconnot, P., Chou, S. C., Collins, W.,
Cox, P., Driouech, F., Emori, S., Eyring, V., Forest, C., Gleckler, P.,
Guilyardi, E., Jakob, C., Kattsov, V., Reason, C., Rummukainen, M.,
AchutaRao, K., Anav, A., Andrews, T., Baehr, J., Bindoff, N. L.,
Bodas-Salcedo, A., Catto, J., Chambers, D., Chang, P., Dai, A., Deser, C.,
Doblas-Reyes, F., Durack, P. J., Eby, M., de Elia, R., Fichefet, T., Forster,
P., Frame, D., Fyfe, J., Gbobaniyi, E., Gillett, N., González-Rouco, J. F.,
Goodess, C., Griffies, S., Hall, A., Harrison, S., Hense, A., Hunke, E.,
Ilyina, T., Ivanova, D., Johnson, G., Kageyama, M., Kharin, V., Klein, S. A.,
Knight, J., Knutti, R., Landerer, F., Lee, T., Li, H., Mahowald, N., Mears,
C., Meehl, G., Morice, C., Msadek, R., Myhre, G., Neelin, J. D., Painter, J.,
Pavlova, T., Perlwitz, J., Peterschmitt, J.-Y., Räisänen, J., Rauser, F.,
Reid, J., Rodwell, M., Santer, B., Scaife, A. A., Schulz, J., Scinocca, J.,
Sexton, D., Shindell, D., Shiogama, H., Sillmann, J., Simmons, A., Sperber,
K., Stephenson, D., Stevens, B., Stott, P., Sutton, R., Thorne, P. W., van
Oldenborgh, G. J., Vecchi, G., Webb, M., Williams, K., Woollings, T., Xie,
S.-P., and Zhang, J.: Evaluation of climate models, in: Climate change 2013:
the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by:
Stocker, T., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S., Boschung, J.,
Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P.,   741–866, Cambridge
University Press, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.020</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Ford et al.(2015)Ford, Ravelo, and Polissar</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ford, H. L., Ravelo, A. C., and Polissar, P. J.: Reduced El
Niño–Southern Oscillation during the Last Glacial Maximum, Science,
347, 255–258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258437" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258437</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Gregory et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gregory, J. M., Ingram, W. J., Palmer, M. A., Jones, G. S., Stott, P. A., Thorpe, R. B., Lowe, J. A., Johns, T. C., and Williams, K. D.: A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L03205,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl018747" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl018747</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Gulev et al.(2021)Gulev, Thorne, Ahn, Dentener, Domingues, Gerland,
Gong, Kaufman, Nnamchi, Quaas, Rivera, Sathyendranath, Smith, Trewin, von
Shuckmann, and Vose</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gulev, S. K., Thorne, P. W., Ahn, J., Dentener, F. J., Domingues, C. M.,
Gerland, S., Gong, D., Kaufman, D. S., Nnamchi, H. C., Quaas, J., Rivera,
J. A., Sathyendranath, S., Smith, S. L., Trewin, B., von Shuckmann, K., and
Vose, R. S.: Changing State of the Climate System, in: Climate Change 2021:
The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by:
Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger,
S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K.,
Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O.,
Yu, R., and Zhou, B., chap. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,
<a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Chapter_02.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 13 February 2023),
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Guo et al.(2018)Guo, Liu, Yang, and Fan</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guo, F., Liu, Q., Yang, J., and Fan, L.: Three types of Indian Ocean basin
modes, Clim. Dynam., 51, 4357–4370, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3676-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3676-z</a>,
2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Halder et al.(2021)Halder, Parekh, Chowdary, Gnanaseelan, and
Kulkarni</label><mixed-citation>
      
Halder, S., Parekh, A., Chowdary, J. S., Gnanaseelan, C., and Kulkarni, A.:
Assessment of CMIP6 models' skill for tropical Indian Ocean sea surface
temperature variability, Int. J. Climatol., 41,
2568–2588, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6975" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6975</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Heede et al.(2021)Heede, Fedorov, and Burls</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heede, U. K., Fedorov, A. V., and Burls, N. J.: A stronger versus weaker
Walker: understanding model differences in fast and slow tropical Pacific
responses to global warming, Clim. Dynam., 57, 2505–2522,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05818-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05818-5</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Hrudya et al.(2021)Hrudya, Varikoden, and Vishnu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hrudya, P., Varikoden, H., and Vishnu, R.: A review on the Indian summer
monsoon rainfall, variability and its association with ENSO and IOD,
Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 133, 1–14,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-020-00734-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-020-00734-5</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Hu et al.(2014)Hu, Huang, Zheng, Xie, Qu, Du, and
Liu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hu, K., Huang, G., Zheng, X.-T., Xie, S.-P., Qu, X., Du, Y., and Liu, L.:
Interdecadal variations in ENSO influences on northwest Pacific–East
Asian early summertime climate simulated in CMIP5 models, J.
Climate, 27, 5982–5998, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00268.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00268.1</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Huang et al.(2016)Huang, Hu, Qu, Tao, Yao, Zhao, and
Jiang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, G., Hu, K., Qu, X., Tao, W., Yao, S., Zhao, G., and Jiang, W.: A review
about Indian Ocean basin mode and its impacts on East Asian summer
climate, Chin. J. Atmos. Sci, 40, 121–130,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1505.15143" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1505.15143</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Huang et al.(2022)Huang, Zhang, Liu, and Stuecker</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, Z., Zhang, W., Liu, C., and Stuecker, M. F.: Extreme Indian Ocean dipole
events associated with El Niño and Madden–Julian oscillation, Clim.
Dynam.,  59,   1953–1968,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06190-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06190-8</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Hui and Zheng(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hui, C. and Zheng, X.-T.: Uncertainty in Indian Ocean Dipole response to global
warming: the role of internal variability, Clim. Dynam., 51, 3597–3611,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4098-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4098-2</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Iwakiri and Watanabe(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Iwakiri, T. and Watanabe, M.: Strengthening of the Indian Ocean Dipole with
increasing seasonal cycle in the mid-Holocene, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
46, 8320–8328, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083088" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083088</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Jones et al.(2018)Jones, Roberts, Steig, Cuffey, Markle, and
White</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jones, T. R., Roberts, W. H., Steig, E. J., Cuffey, K., Markle, B., and White,
J.: Southern Hemisphere climate variability forced by Northern Hemisphere
ice-sheet topography, Nature, 554, 351–355, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24669" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24669</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Kageyama et al.(2017)Kageyama, Albani, Braconnot, Harrison, Hopcroft,
Ivanovic, Lambert, Marti, Peltier, Peterschmitt et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kageyama, M., Albani, S., Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Hopcroft, P. O., Ivanovic, R. F., Lambert, F., Marti, O., Peltier, W. R., Peterschmitt, J.-Y., Roche, D. M., Tarasov, L., Zhang, X., Brady, E. C., Haywood, A. M., LeGrande, A. N., Lunt, D. J., Mahowald, N. M., Mikolajewicz, U., Nisancioglu, K. H., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Renssen, H., Tomas, R. A., Zhang, Q., Abe-Ouchi, A., Bartlein, P. J., Cao, J., Li, Q., Lohmann, G., Ohgaito, R., Shi, X., Volodin, E., Yoshida, K., Zhang, X., and Zheng, W.: The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 4: Scientific objectives and experimental design of the PMIP4-CMIP6 Last Glacial Maximum experiments and PMIP4 sensitivity experiments, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4035–4055, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4035-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4035-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Kageyama et al.(2018)Kageyama, Braconnot, Harrison, Haywood,
Jungclaus, Otto-Bliesner, Abe-Ouchi, Albani, Bartlein, and
Brierley</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kageyama, M., Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Haywood, A. M., Jungclaus, J. H., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Peterschmitt, J.-Y., Abe-Ouchi, A., Albani, S., Bartlein, P. J., Brierley, C., Crucifix, M., Dolan, A., Fernandez-Donado, L., Fischer, H., Hopcroft, P. O., Ivanovic, R. F., Lambert, F., Lunt, D. J., Mahowald, N. M., Peltier, W. R., Phipps, S. J., Roche, D. M., Schmidt, G. A., Tarasov, L., Valdes, P. J., Zhang, Q., and Zhou, T.: The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 1: Overview and over-arching analysis plan, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1033–1057, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1033-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1033-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Kageyama et al.(2021)Kageyama, Harrison, Kapsch, Lofverstrom, Lora,
Mikolajewicz, Sherriff-Tadano, Vadsaria, Abe-Ouchi, Bouttes
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kageyama, M., Harrison, S. P., Kapsch, M.-L., Lofverstrom, M., Lora, J. M., Mikolajewicz, U., Sherriff-Tadano, S., Vadsaria, T., Abe-Ouchi, A., Bouttes, N., Chandan, D., Gregoire, L. J., Ivanovic, R. F., Izumi, K., LeGrande, A. N., Lhardy, F., Lohmann, G., Morozova, P. A., Ohgaito, R., Paul, A., Peltier, W. R., Poulsen, C. J., Quiquet, A., Roche, D. M., Shi, X., Tierney, J. E., Valdes, P. J., Volodin, E., and Zhu, J.: The PMIP4 Last Glacial Maximum experiments: preliminary results and comparison with the PMIP3 simulations, Clim. Past, 17, 1065–1089, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1065-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1065-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Kajtar et al.(2017)Kajtar, Santoso, England, and
Cai</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kajtar, J. B., Santoso, A., England, M. H., and Cai, W.: Tropical climate
variability: interactions across the Pacific, Indian, and Atlantic Oceans,
Clim. Dynam., 48, 2173–2190, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3199-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3199-z</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Leduc et al.(2009)Leduc, Vidal, Cartapanis, and Bard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Leduc, G., Vidal, L., Cartapanis, O., and Bard, E.: Modes of eastern equatorial
Pacific thermocline variability: Implications for ENSO dynamics over the
last glacial period, Paleoceanography, 24, PA3202,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008PA001701" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008PA001701</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Lee et al.(2015)Lee, Chiang, and Chang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lee, S.-Y., Chiang, J. C., and Chang, P.: Tropical Pacific response to
continental ice sheet topography, Clim. Dynam., 44, 2429–2446,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2162-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2162-0</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Li et al.(2017)Li, Lin, and Cai</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, Z., Lin, X., and Cai, W.: Realism of modelled Indian summer monsoon
correlation with the tropical Indo-Pacific affects projected monsoon
changes, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 1–7, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05225-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05225-z</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Liu et al.(2014)Liu, Xie, Zheng, Li, Du, Huang, and
Yu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, L., Xie, S.-P., Zheng, X.-T., Li, T., Du, Y., Huang, G., and Yu, W.-D.:
Indian Ocean variability in the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble: the zonal
dipole mode, Clim. Dynam., 43, 1715–1730,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-2000-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-2000-9</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Liu et al.(2023)Liu, Yuan, jia Luo, Ma, Zhou, and
Yamagata</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, S., Yuan, C., jia Luo, J., Ma, X., Zhou, X., and Yamagata, T.: Weakening
of the Indian Ocean Dipole in the mid-Holocene due to the mean oceanic
climatology change, arXiv [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.31223/X5VS9H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.31223/X5VS9H</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Liu et al.(2007)Liu, Liu, Clemens, Prell, and
Kutzbach</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, X., Liu, Z., Clemens, S., Prell, W., and Kutzbach, J.: A coupled model
study of glacial Asian monsoon variability and Indian ocean dipole,
J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 85, 1–10,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.85.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.85.1</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Lu et al.(2016)Lu, Liu, and Zhu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lu, Z., Liu, Z., and Zhu, J.: Abrupt intensification of ENSO forced by
deglacial ice-sheet retreat in CCSM3, Clim. Dynam., 46, 1877–1891,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2681-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2681-3</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Marathe et al.(2021)Marathe, Terray, and
Karumuri</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marathe, S., Terray, P., and Karumuri, A.: Tropical Indian Ocean and ENSO
relationships in a changed climate, Clim. Dynam., 56, 3255–3276,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05641-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05641-y</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>McKenna et al.(2020)McKenna, Santoso, Gupta, Taschetto, and
Cai</label><mixed-citation>
      
McKenna, S., Santoso, A., Gupta, A. S., Taschetto, A. S., and Cai, W.: Indian
Ocean Dipole in CMIP5 and CMIP6: characteristics, biases, and links to
ENSO, Sci. Rep.-UK, 10, 1–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68268-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68268-9</a>,
2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Ng et al.(2014)Ng, Cai, and Walsh</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ng, B., Cai, W., and Walsh, K.: The role of the SST-thermocline relationship in
Indian Ocean Dipole skewness and its response to global warming, Sci.
Rep.-UK, 4, 1–6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06034</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Ogata et al.(2013)Ogata, Xie, Lan, and Zheng</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ogata, T., Xie, S.-P., Lan, J., and Zheng, X.: Importance of ocean dynamics for
the skewness of the Indian Ocean dipole mode, J. Climate, 26,
2145–2159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-11-00615.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-11-00615.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Otto-Bliesner et al.(2017)Otto-Bliesner, Braconnot, Harrison, Lunt,
Abe-Ouchi, Albani, Bartlein, Capron, Carlson, Dutton et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Lunt, D. J., Abe-Ouchi, A., Albani, S., Bartlein, P. J., Capron, E., Carlson, A. E., Dutton, A., Fischer, H., Goelzer, H., Govin, A., Haywood, A., Joos, F., LeGrande, A. N., Lipscomb, W. H., Lohmann, G., Mahowald, N., Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Pausata, F. S. R., Peterschmitt, J.-Y., Phipps, S. J., Renssen, H., and Zhang, Q.: The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 2: Two interglacials, scientific objective and experimental design for Holocene and Last Interglacial simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3979–4003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3979-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3979-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Otto-Bliesner et al.(2021)Otto-Bliesner, Brady, Zhao, Brierley,
Axford, Capron, Govin, Hoffman, Isaacs, Kageyama, Scussolini, Tzedakis,
Williams, Wolff, Abe-Ouchi, Braconnot, Ramos Buarque, Cao, de Vernal,
Guarino, Guo, LeGrande, Lohmann, Meissner, Menviel, Nisancioglu, O'ishi,
Salas Y Melia, Shi, Sicard, Sime, Tomas, Volodin, Yeung, Zhang, Zhang, and
Zheng</label><mixed-citation>
      
Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Brady, E. C., Zhao, A., Brierley, C. M., Axford, Y., Capron, E., Govin, A., Hoffman, J. S., Isaacs, E., Kageyama, M., Scussolini, P., Tzedakis, P. C., Williams, C. J. R., Wolff, E., Abe-Ouchi, A., Braconnot, P., Ramos Buarque, S., Cao, J., de Vernal, A., Guarino, M. V., Guo, C., LeGrande, A. N., Lohmann, G., Meissner, K. J., Menviel, L., Morozova, P. A., Nisancioglu, K. H., O'ishi, R., Salas y Mélia, D., Shi, X., Sicard, M., Sime, L., Stepanek, C., Tomas, R., Volodin, E., Yeung, N. K. H., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Z., and Zheng, W.: Large-scale features of Last Interglacial climate: results from evaluating the lig127k simulations for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6)–Paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project (PMIP4), Clim. Past, 17, 63–94, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-63-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-63-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Perez-Sanz et al.(2014)Perez-Sanz, Li, González-Sampériz, and
Harrison</label><mixed-citation>
      
Perez-Sanz, A., Li, G., González-Sampériz, P., and Harrison, S. P.: Evaluation of modern and mid-Holocene seasonal precipitation of the Mediterranean and northern Africa in the CMIP5 simulations, Clim. Past, 10, 551–568, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-551-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-551-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Phillips et al.(2014)Phillips, Deser, and
Fasullo</label><mixed-citation>
      
Phillips, A. S., Deser, C., and Fasullo, J.: Evaluating modes of variability in
climate models, Eos T. Am. Geophys. Un., 95, 453–455,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EO490002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EO490002</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Power and Delage(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Power, S. B. and Delage, F. P.: El Niño–Southern Oscillation and
associated climatic conditions around the world during the latter half of the
twenty-first century, J. Climate, 31, 6189–6207,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0138.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0138.1</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Qu and Huang(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Qu, X. and Huang, G.: Impacts of tropical Indian Ocean SST on the meridional
displacement of East Asian jet in boreal summer, Int. J.
Climatol., 32, 2073–2080, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2378" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2378</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Rayner et al.(2003)Rayner, Parker, Horton, Folland, Alexander,
Rowell, Kent, and Kaplan</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rayner, N., Parker, D. E., Horton, E., Folland, C. K., Alexander, L. V.,
Rowell, D., Kent, E. C., and Kaplan, A.: Global analyses of sea surface
temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late
nineteenth century, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4407,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Rehfeld et al.(2020)Rehfeld, Hébert, Lora, Lofverstrom, and
Brierley</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rehfeld, K., Hébert, R., Lora, J. M., Lofverstrom, M., and Brierley, C. M.: Variability of surface climate in simulations of past and future, Earth Syst. Dynam., 11, 447–468, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-447-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-447-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Saji et al.(1999)Saji, Goswami, Vinayachandran, and
Yamagata</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saji, N., Goswami, B. N., Vinayachandran, P., and Yamagata, T.: A dipole mode
in the tropical Indian Ocean, Nature, 401, 360–363, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/43854" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/43854</a>,
1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Schott et al.(2009)Schott, Xie, and McCreary Jr</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schott, F. A., Xie, S.-P., and McCreary Jr, J. P.: Indian Ocean circulation and
climate variability, Rev. Geophys., 47, RG1002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000245" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000245</a>,
2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Slivinski et al.(2019)Slivinski, Compo, Whitaker, Sardeshmukh, Giese,
McColl, Allan, Yin, Vose, Titchner et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Slivinski, L. C., Gilbert P. Compo, G. P., Whitaker, J. S., Sardeshmukh, P. D., Giese, B., S., McColl, C., Allan, R., Yin, X., Vose, R., Titchner, H., Kennedy, J., Spencer, L. J., Ashcroft, L., Brönnimann, S., Brunet, M., Camuffo, D., Cornes, R., Cram, T. A., Crouthamel, R., Domínguez-Castro, F., Freeman, J. E., Gergis, J.,  Hawkins, E., Philip D. Jones, P. D., Jourdain, S., Kaplan, A., Kubota, H., Le Blancq, F., Lee, T.-C., Lorrey, A., Luterbacher, J., Maugeri, M., Mock, C. J., Moore, G. W. K., Przybylak, R., Pudmenzky, C., Reason, C., Slonosky, V. C., Smith, C. A., Tinz, B., Trewin, B., Valente, M. A., Wang, X. L., Wilkinson, C., Wood, K., and Wyszyński, P.:
Towards a more reliable historical reanalysis: Improvements for version 3 of
the Twentieth Century Reanalysis system, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 145, 2876–2908, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3598" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3598</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Slivinski et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Slivinski, L., Compo, G., Whitaker, J., and Sardeshmukh, P.: NOAA-CIRES Twentieth Century Reanalysis (V3), Physical Sciences Laboratory,   <a href="https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.20thC_ReanV3.html" target="_blank"/>, last access: 13 February 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Stevenson et al.(2021)Stevenson, Wittenberg, Fasullo, Coats, and
Otto-Bliesner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stevenson, S., Wittenberg, A. T., Fasullo, J., Coats, S., and Otto-Bliesner,
B.: Understanding diverse model projections of future extreme El Niño,
J. Climate, 34, 449–464, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-19-0969.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-19-0969.1</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Stuecker et al.(2017)Stuecker, Timmermann, Jin, Chikamoto, Zhang,
Wittenberg, Widiasih, and Zhao</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stuecker, M. F., Timmermann, A., Jin, F.-F., Chikamoto, Y., Zhang, W.,
Wittenberg, A. T., Widiasih, E., and Zhao, S.: Revisiting ENSO/Indian Ocean
dipole phase relationships, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2481–2492,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072308" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072308</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Tao et al.(2015)Tao, Huang, Hu, Qu, Wen, and
Gong</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tao, W., Huang, G., Hu, K., Qu, X., Wen, G., and Gong, H.: Interdecadal
modulation of ENSO teleconnections to the Indian Ocean Basin Mode and their
relationship under global warming in CMIP5 models, Int. J.
Climatol., 35, 391–407, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3987" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3987</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Tao et al.(2016)Tao, Huang, Hu, Gong, Wen, and Liu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tao, W., Huang, G., Hu, K., Gong, H., Wen, G., and Liu, L.: A study of biases
in simulation of the Indian Ocean basin mode and its capacitor effect in
CMIP3/CMIP5 models, Clim. Dynam., 46, 205–226,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2579-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2579-0</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Thirumalai et al.(2019)Thirumalai, DiNezio, Tierney, Puy, and
Mohtadi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thirumalai, K., DiNezio, P. N., Tierney, J. E., Puy, M., and Mohtadi, M.: An El
Niño mode in the glacial indian ocean?, Paleoceanography and
Paleoclimatology, 34, 1316–1327, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003669" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003669</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Tierney et al.(2020)Tierney, Zhu, King, Malevich, Hakim, and
Poulsen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tierney, J. E., Zhu, J., King, J., Malevich, S. B., Hakim, G. J., and Poulsen,
C. J.: Glacial cooling and climate sensitivity revisited, Nature, 584,
569–573, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2617-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2617-x</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Trenberth(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trenberth, K. E.: The definition of El Niño, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2771–2778,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078&lt;2771:TDOENO&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078&lt;2771:TDOENO&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Ullman et al.(2014)Ullman, LeGrande, Carlson, Anslow, and
Licciardi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ullman, D. J., LeGrande, A. N., Carlson, A. E., Anslow, F. S., and Licciardi, J. M.: Assessing the impact of Laurentide Ice Sheet topography on glacial climate, Clim. Past, 10, 487–507, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-487-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-487-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Vecchi and Soden(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vecchi, G. A. and Soden, B. J.: Global warming and the weakening of the
tropical circulation, J. Climate, 20, 4316–4340,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4258.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4258.1</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Wainwright et al.(2021)Wainwright, Finney, Kilavi, Black, and
Marsham</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wainwright, C. M., Finney, D. L., Kilavi, M., Black, E., and Marsham, J. H.:
Extreme rainfall in East Africa, October 2019–January 2020 and context
under future climate change, Weather, 76, 26–31,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.3824" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.3824</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Wang(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, C.: Three-ocean interactions and climate variability: a review and
perspective, Clim. Dynam., 53, 5119–5136,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04930-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04930-x</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Wang and Cai(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, G. and Cai, W.: Two-year consecutive concurrences of positive Indian
Ocean Dipole and Central Pacific El Niño preconditioned the 2019/2020
Australian “black summer” bushfires, Geosci. Lett., 7, 1–9,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-020-00168-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-020-00168-2</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Wang et al.(2021)Wang, Cai, and Santoso</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, G., Cai, W., and Santoso, A.: Simulated thermocline tilt over the
tropical Indian Ocean and its influence on future sea surface temperature
variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL091902,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091902" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091902</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Wang et al.(2016)Wang, Murtugudde, and Kumar</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, H., Murtugudde, R., and Kumar, A.: Evolution of Indian Ocean dipole and
its forcing mechanisms in the absence of ENSO, Clim. Dynam., 47,
2481–2500, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-2977-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-2977-y</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Waskom(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Waskom, M. L.: Seaborn: statistical data visualization, Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3021, <a href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Webster et al.(1999)Webster, Moore, Loschnigg, and
Leben</label><mixed-citation>
      
Webster, P. J., Moore, A. M., Loschnigg, J. P., and Leben, R. R.: Coupled
ocean–atmosphere dynamics in the Indian Ocean during 1997–98, Nature,
401, 356–360, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/43848" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/43848</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Wyrtki(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wyrtki, K.: Some thoughts about the west Pacific warm pool, in: Proceedings
of the western pacific international meeting and workshop on TOGA COARE,
ORSTOM/Nouméa New Caledonia, 99–109, <a href="https://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/doc34-08/30199.pdf" target="_blank"/>
(last access: 13 February 2023), 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Xu et al.(2021)Xu, Wang, and Yu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, X., Wang, L., and Yu, W.: The unique mean seasonal cycle in the Indian
Ocean anchors its various air-sea coupled modes across the basin, Sci.
Rep.-UK, 11, 1–8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84936-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84936-w</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Yeung et al.(2021)Yeung, Menviel, Meissner, Taschetto, Ziehn, and
Chamberlain</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yeung, N. K.-H., Menviel, L., Meissner, K. J., Taschetto, A. S., Ziehn, T., and Chamberlain, M.: Land–sea temperature contrasts at the Last Interglacial and their impact on the hydrological cycle, Clim. Past, 17, 869–885, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-869-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-869-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Zelinka et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zelinka, M. D., Myers, T. A., McCoy, D. T., Po-Chedley, S., Caldwell, P. M., Ceppi, P., Klein, S. A., and Taylor, K. E.: Causes of higher climate sensitivity in CMIP6 models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085782, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>Zhang et al.(2021)Zhang, Wang, Newman, and
Han</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, L., Wang, G., Newman, M., and Han, W.: Interannual to decadal
variability of tropical Indian Ocean sea surface temperature: Pacific
influence versus local internal variability, J. Climate, 34,
2669–2684, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-20-0807.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-20-0807.1</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Zhang et al.(2020)Zhang, Li, Zhao, Zheng, Feng, Li, and
Xu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y., Li, J., Zhao, S., Zheng, F., Feng, J., Li, Y., and Xu, Y.: Indian
Ocean tripole mode and its associated atmospheric and oceanic processes,
Clim. Dynam., 55, 1367–1383, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05331-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05331-1</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Zhao et al.(2022)Zhao, Brierley, Jiang, Eyles, Oyarzún, and
Gomez-Dans</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhao, A., Brierley, C. M., Jiang, Z., Eyles, R., Oyarzún, D., and Gomez-Dans, J.: Analysing the PMIP4-CMIP6 collection: a workflow and tool (pmip_p2fvar_analyzer v1), Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2475–2488, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2475-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2475-2022</a>, 2022.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>Zheng(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zheng, X.-T.: Indo-pacific climate modes in warming climate: consensus and
uncertainty across model projections, Current Climate Change Reports, 5,
308–321, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-019-00152-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-019-00152-9</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>Zheng et al.(2011)Zheng, Xie, and Liu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zheng, X.-T., Xie, S.-P., and Liu, Q.: Response of the Indian Ocean basin
mode and its capacitor effect to global warming, J. Climate, 24,
6146–6164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4169.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4169.1</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>Zheng et al.(2013)Zheng, Xie, Du, Liu, Huang, and
Liu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zheng, X.-T., Xie, S.-P., Du, Y., Liu, L., Huang, G., and Liu, Q.: Indian Ocean
dipole response to global warming in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble, J.
Climate, 26, 6067–6080, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00638.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00638.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>Zheng et al.(2021)Zheng, Lu, and Hui</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zheng, X.-T., Lu, J., and Hui, C.: Response of seasonal phase locking of
Indian Ocean Dipole to global warming, Clim. Dynam., 57, 2737–2751,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05834-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05834-5</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>Ziegler et al.(2010)Ziegler, Tuenter, and
Lourens</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ziegler, M., Tuenter, E., and Lourens, L. J.: The precession phase of the
boreal summer monsoon as viewed from the eastern Mediterranean (ODP Site
968), Quaternary Sci. Rev., 29, 1481–1490,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.03.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.03.011</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
