<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">CP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Climate of the Past</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">CP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Clim. Past</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1814-9332</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/cp-19-1623-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>Tracing North Atlantic volcanism and seaway connectivity across the
Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM)</article-title><alt-title>Tracing North Atlantic volcanism</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Tracing North Atlantic volcanism}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M. T. Jones et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>Morgan T.</given-names></name>
          <email>m.t.jones@geo.uio.no</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3047-0751</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Stokke</surname><given-names>Ella W.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Rooney</surname><given-names>Alan D.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Frieling</surname><given-names>Joost</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5374-1625</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Pogge von Strandmann</surname><given-names>Philip A. E.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>David J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Svensen</surname><given-names>Henrik H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6 aff7">
          <name><surname>Planke</surname><given-names>Sverre</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6128-2193</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Adatte</surname><given-names>Thierry</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4319-2212</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Thibault</surname><given-names>Nicolas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4147-5531</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Vickers</surname><given-names>Madeleine L.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4964-0418</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Mather</surname><given-names>Tamsin A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4259-7303</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff10">
          <name><surname>Tegner</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1407-7298</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff11">
          <name><surname>Zuchuat</surname><given-names>Valentin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff12">
          <name><surname>Schultz</surname><given-names>Bo P.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4861-1313</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Centre for Planetary Habitability, Department of Geosciences,
University of Oslo, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>P.O. Box 1028 Blindern, 0315 Oslo, Norway</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, P.O. Box
208109, New Haven, CT 06520-8109, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road,
Oxford, OX1 3AN, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Mainz Isotope and Geochemistry Centre (MIGHTY), Institute of
Geosciences, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Johannes Gutenberg University, 55122 Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>London Geochemistry and Isotope Centre (LOGIC), Institute of Earth
and Planetary Sciences, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>University College London and Birkbeck, University
of London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1047 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Volcanic Basin Petroleum Research (VBPR AS), Høienhald,
Blindernveien 5, 0361 Oslo, Norway</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne,
Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>Department of Geoscience, Aarhus University, Høegh-Guldbergs Gade 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff11"><label>11</label><institution>Palaeontology and Geological Institute, Aachen University,
Bergbaugebäude 1140, Wüllnerstraße 2, Aachen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff12"><label>12</label><institution>Museum Salling – Fur Museum, 7884 Fur, Denmark</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Morgan T. Jones (m.t.jones@geo.uio.no)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>8</day><month>August</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>1623</fpage><lpage>1652</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>10</day><month>January</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>16</day><month>January</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20</day><month>June</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>June</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 Morgan T. Jones et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/1623/2023/cp-19-1623-2023.html">This article is available from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/1623/2023/cp-19-1623-2023.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/1623/2023/cp-19-1623-2023.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/1623/2023/cp-19-1623-2023.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e292">There is a temporal correlation between the peak activity of the North
Atlantic Igneous Province (NAIP) and the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum
(PETM), suggesting that the NAIP may have initiated and/or prolonged this
extreme warming event. However, corroborating a causal relationship is
hampered by a scarcity of expanded sedimentary records that contain both
climatic and volcanic proxies. One locality hosting such a record is the island of Fur in Denmark, where an expanded pre- to post-PETM succession containing
hundreds of NAIP ash layers is exceptionally well preserved. We compiled a
range of environmental proxies, including mercury (Hg) anomalies,
paleotemperature proxies, and lithium (Li) and osmium (Os) isotopes, to
trace NAIP activity, hydrological changes, weathering, and seawater
connectivity across this interval. Volcanic proxies suggest that NAIP
activity was elevated before the PETM and appears to have peaked during the
body of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C excursion but decreased considerably during
the PETM recovery. This suggests that the acme in NAIP activity, dominated
by flood basalt volcanism and thermogenic degassing from contact
metamorphism, was likely confined to just <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 kyr (ca. 56.0–55.8 Ma). The hundreds of thick (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 cm) basaltic ashes in the post-PETM strata
likely represent a change from effusive to explosive activity, rather than
an increase in NAIP activity. Detrital <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li values and clay
abundances suggest that volcanic ash production increased the basaltic reactive
surface area, likely enhancing silicate weathering and atmospheric carbon
sequestration in the early Eocene. Signals in lipid biomarkers and Os
isotopes, traditionally used to trace paleotemperature and weathering
changes, are used here to track seaway connectivity. These proxies indicate
that the North Sea was rapidly cut off from the North Atlantic in under 12 kyr during the PETM recovery due to NAIP thermal uplift. Our findings
reinforce the hypothesis that the<?pagebreak page1624?> emplacement of the NAIP had a profound and
complex impact on Paleocene–Eocene climate, both directly through volcanic
and thermogenic degassing and indirectly by driving regional uplift and
changing seaway connectivity.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Norges Forskningsråd</funding-source>
<award-id>263000</award-id>
<award-id>223272</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e340">The Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) (Kennett and Stott, 1991) was a
period of extreme global warming during the greenhouse conditions already present during the early Cenozoic (Cramwinckel et al., 2018; Zachos et al., 2008). This
hyperthermal event began at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 56.0–55.9 Ma (Westerhold et
al., 2017; Zeebe and Lourens, 2019) and lasted for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150–200 kyr (Murphy et al., 2010; Röhl et al., 2007). The PETM is characterised
in the sedimentary record by a large and sustained negative carbon isotope
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C) excursion (CIE) that varies in magnitude from 2 ‰ to 7 ‰, with the larger excursions generally found in
organic and terrestrial archives (McInerney and Wing, 2011). The carbon
cycle perturbations, and particularly the CIE onset, are traditionally
attributed to the rapid release of large volumes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched carbon
to the ocean–atmosphere system (Dickens et al., 1995; Zachos et al., 2008),
which caused an estimated global surface warming of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Dunkley-Jones et al., 2013; Frieling et al., 2017; Inglis et
al., 2020). The potential triggers of the PETM remain contentious, despite
intense study of many sedimentary sections through Paleocene–Eocene strata.
Carbon sources that have received significant attention are the
destabilisation of surface reservoirs such as methane hydrates (Dickens et
al., 1995), possibly triggered by orbital forcing (Li et al., 2022; Lourens
et al., 2005). Other well-studied sources include the direct volcanic
emissions from the North Atlantic Igneous Province (NAIP) (Eldholm and
Thomas, 1993; Storey et al., 2007a) and thermogenic degassing from NAIP
contact metamorphism (Svensen et al., 2004).</p>
      <p id="d1e394">The NAIP is a prominent candidate for the initiation and/or extended
duration of the PETM because there is good temporal agreement between NAIP
activity and the Paleocene–Eocene boundary (Storey et al., 2007a), and
there are numerous climate forcings operating on a range of timescales
associated with its emplacement. Volatile degassing during large igneous
province (LIP) eruptions and the thermogenic release from contact
metamorphism around intrusions can release significant volumes of
both carbon and sulfur to the atmosphere, directly affecting their surface cycles
and consequently the climate and environment (Jones et al., 2016). Recent
studies often argue for a combination of volcanic and metamorphic NAIP
sources (Gutjahr et al., 2017) or a mix of volcanic and surface reservoirs
(Frieling et al., 2016) as a driver of hyperthermal conditions.
Uncertainties persist because an extremely <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched (i.e.
organic-rich) source that is sufficient to cause the CIE does not produce
the magnitude of warming derived from proxy data within realistic bounds of
climate sensitivity (Zeebe et al., 2009). Modelling estimates based on
inverted pH proxy data arrived at far greater degassing volumes (thousands of gigatonnes of carbon), which would require less <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched (e.g. magmatic) sources to
match the CIE (Gutjahr et al., 2017). A recent study by Gernon et al. (2022)
suggested that elevated magmatic carbon release from a lithospheric mantle source
may have augmented NAIP degassing fluxes during the PETM. However, their
model is based on localities with sparse, uncorrected, and ambiguous
geochronological data (e.g. Passey and Jolley, 2008; Wilkinson et al.,
2017), and a refined and up-to-date bio- and chemostratigraphic control of
target localities is required for this hypothesis to be thoroughly tested.</p>
      <p id="d1e415">A key issue is that most carbon cycle model scenarios appear to be at odds
with the extremely enhanced organic carbon burial rates during much of the
PETM (Kaya et al., 2022; John et al., 2008). A recent modelling study
demonstrated that a large organic carbon sink would rapidly drive exogenic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C to positive values unless the impact of organic carbon
burial was reduced during the CIE body (Papadomanolaki et al., 2022). More
often, a scenario is chosen that focuses the impact of organic carbon burial
on the later parts of the CIE to match the CIE recovery (Bowen and Zachos,
2010; Bowen, 2013; Gutjahr et al., 2017; Papadomanolaki et al., 2022).
However, scenarios with reduced organic carbon burial during the initial
phases of the CIE remain in conflict with field observations (e.g. John et
al., 2008; Kaya et al., 2022) and complicate direct interpretation of the CIE
purely on the grounds of the source <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signature. Constraining
the timing and style of NAIP activity is critical to understanding the
volumes and fluxes of each potential carbon source in order to determine
their roles in the initiation and long duration of the PETM.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <label>1.1</label><title>Direct NAIP climate impacts</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>1.1.1</label><title>Volcanic degassing</title>
      <?pagebreak page1625?><p id="d1e454">The NAIP is one of the largest known LIPs in the Phanerozoic (Ernst and
Youbi, 2017), with an estimated total volume of 6–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of magma
emplaced at or near the Earth's surface (Eldholm and Grue, 1994; Horni et al.,
2017). Assuming a magmatic CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content of 0.5 wt %  and a degassing
potential of 3.5 Mt C km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of magma (Jones et al., 2016), the NAIP
represents a total magmatic carbon reservoir of 21 000 to 35 000 Gt C. Much
of this volume was likely degassed during effusive and explosive volcanic
eruptions. While the NAIP was active from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63–54 Ma, the
main acme (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 %) of volcanism occurred from 56 to 54 Ma
(Wilkinson et al., 2017). In East Greenland, voluminous eruptions formed a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5–6 km thick part of the flood basalt province between 56.0
and 55.5 Ma (Larsen and Tegner, 2006; Storey et al., 2007a,
b), representing a basalt accumulation rate of at least 1 cm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  for
500 000 years. There is also evidence of significant explosive volcanism
across the PETM interval from the presence of hundreds of NAIP-sourced ash
layers across northern Europe (Egger and Brückl, 2006; M. T. Jones et al.,
2019; Larsen et al., 2003; Stokke et al., 2020b). These findings suggest
that effusive and explosive volcanic degassing from the NAIP considerably
amplified global volcanic emissions of carbon and sulfur across the
Paleocene–Eocene boundary.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>1.1.2</label><title>Thermogenic emissions</title>
      <p id="d1e545">In addition to extrusive activity, massive sill complexes were emplaced in
organic-rich sediments around the north-eastern Atlantic continental margins
(Fig. 1). The sill edges connect to thousands of explosive hydrothermal
vent complexes that were formed through volatile generation and
gas overpressure during contact metamorphism (Svensen et al., 2004). Many of
these vent systems terminate at or close to the Paleocene–Eocene
paleo-surface on the Greenlandic, Faroe–Shetland, and Norwegian
continental margins (Hansen, 2006; Manton et al., 2022; Planke et al., 2005;
Reynolds et al., 2017). Degassing was likely a combination of magmatic gases
and thermogenic volatiles formed during contact metamorphism. The high
methane (CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) content in thermogenic volatiles both enhances the
atmospheric greenhouse effect compared to CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and leads to more
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched emissions, making this source a prime candidate for
causing the PETM CIE. Recent drilling of two hydrothermal vent complexes
shows that both were formed just before or during the PETM (Berndt et al., 2023; Frieling et al.,
2016; Planke et al., 2023). Estimates for carbon release from hydrothermal
vents on the Norwegian continental margin range from 225 to 2250 Gt C
(Svensen et al., 2004), with the degassing over the entire area affected by
NAIP intrusions possibly up to 13 000 Gt C (S. M. Jones et al., 2019). This
volatile source has the potential for rapid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 kyr) and
voluminous degassing if many sill–vent systems were active simultaneously.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e584">A plate reconstruction at 56 Ma showing the known extent
of the North Atlantic Igneous Province (NAIP). Light-red and purple areas
denote subaerial and submarine volcanism, respectively, with dark-red points
marking individual volcanic centres (Abdelmalak et al., 2016; Horni et al.,
2017). The shaded grey areas show the known extent of NAIP sill intrusions
on the continental margins (Planke et al., 2005; Rateau et al., 2013;
Reynolds et al., 2017), although this is a minimum estimate as the
identification of sills beneath extrusive layers is obscured by poor seismic
retrievals. Paleo-shoreline estimates are an amalgamation from several
sources (Abdelmalak et al., 2016; Golonka, 2009; Hovikoski et al., 2021;
Zacke et al., 2009). Shelf areas are shown in light blue, while ocean basins
are shown in dark blue. NZ: Novaya Zemlya; NGS: Norwegian–Greenland
Seaway; FSB: Faroe–Shetland Basin. Fur is labelled with a yellow
marker. The volcanic localities of the Gronau West Nunatak (Heister et al.,
2001) and the island of Lundy (Larsen et al., 2003) have red markers. The locations
of Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) Site 550 (Goban Spur), Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Site 642, Svalbard, and Grane cores
(M. T. Jones et al., 2019; Knox, 1984, 1985; Wieczorek et al., 2013) are shown
with grey markers, while International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 396 sites (Planke et al., 2023) are
shown with white markers. The plate reconstruction was created using a
modified version of GPlates (Boyden et al., 2011; Gurnis et al., 2012;
Shephard et al., 2013) and plotted with Generic Mapping Tools (Wessel et
al., 2013).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/1623/2023/cp-19-1623-2023-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <label>1.2</label><title>Indirect NAIP climate impacts</title>
      <p id="d1e603">In addition to volatile degassing, the emplacement of the NAIP may have
affected the global climate system through other processes such as increased
continental weathering and widespread regional uplift.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>1.2.1</label><title>Enhanced carbon sinks</title>
      <p id="d1e613">The PETM led to a global increase in continental weathering and erosion
(Pogge von Strandmann et al., 2021; Pujalte et al., 2015; Ravizza et al.,
2001) as well as widespread enhanced marine organic carbon burial (John et al.,
2008; Kaya et al., 2022; Papadomanolaki et al., 2022), which both act as
negative feedbacks to increased atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels. The emplacement
of flood basalt lavas and widespread ash deposits would have significantly
enhanced the availability of fresh reactive silicate material at the surface
(Dessert et al., 2003). Volcanic ash from explosive eruptions is
particularly important in this process due to its high surface-area-to-volume ratio (Ayris and Delmelle, 2012; Longman et<?pagebreak page1626?> al., 2021).
Combined with an intensified hydrological cycle (Carmichael et al., 2017;
Walters et al., 2022), this increase in reactive volcanic substrate
amplified the transport of weathered material to the oceans (Nielsen et al.,
2015; Stokke et al., 2021). Enhanced fluvial fluxes of nutrients and
alkalinity are likely to have increased carbon sequestration through both
carbonate formation and organic matter burial (Jones et al., 2016). The
silicate weathering of NAIP basalts and ash deposits has therefore been
proposed as a potential carbon sink that acted as a negative feedback to
global warming and aided the termination of the PETM (Longman et al., 2021;
Stokke et al., 2021).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>1.2.2</label><title>Regional uplift</title>
      <p id="d1e633">The North Sea was a pivotal epicontinental sea with intermittent connections
to the Arctic, Atlantic, and Tethys oceans (Fig. 1). An estimated 1–3 km
of transient convective uplift occurred between Greenland and the British
Isles during the latest Paleocene (Hartley et al., 2011; Shaw Champion et
al., 2008; White and Lovell, 1997). The NAIP uplift has been cited as a
potential source of methane hydrate release from raised marine sediments
(Maclennan and Jones, 2006). This uplifted region would have had a marked
effect on atmospheric and oceanic circulation, particularly seaway
connectivity to the Arctic Ocean that likely had a strong influence on
global climate (Roberts et al., 2009). A sporadic shallow marine connection
in the English Channel connected the North Sea with the North Atlantic Ocean
(Zacke et al., 2009), whereas Paleocene NAIP uplift closed the strait in the
Faroe–Shetland Basin, and it remained closed until at least 54 Ma (Hartley
et al., 2011; Shaw Champion et al., 2008). Further north, thermal uplift and
lava delta progradation narrowed the Norwegian–Greenland Seaway to possibly
as little as 50 km of open water (Hovikoski et al., 2021), potentially
isolating the North Sea from the intra-rift seaways of the northern
Norwegian margin (Fig. 1). While the Central Spitsbergen Basin in Svalbard
was not directly connected to the Arctic due to the Eurekan deformation
(Straume et al., 2022), there was likely a broad seaway across the Barents
Shelf that connected the Norwegian–Greenland Seaway with the Arctic Ocean
somewhere between Svalbard and Novaya Zemlya (Prøis, 2015) (Fig. 1). To
the east of the North Sea, there may have also been a shallow seawater
connection to the Peri-Tethys through eastern Europe (Radionova et al.,
2003).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS3">
  <label>1.3</label><title>An improved understanding of the NAIP</title>
      <p id="d1e645">Despite the close temporal link between the NAIP emplacement and the PETM,
the exact relationship is complicated by multiple concurrent climate
forcings, incomplete/imprecise geochronological data (Wilkinson et al.,
2017), and uncertainties in the timing and sources of volatile fluxes from
the NAIP (Passey and Jolley, 2008; Stoker et al., 2018). These uncertainties
are compounded by a lack of expanded sedimentary records that contain both
volcanic and climatic proxies in the same sections. The limited dispersal of
many geochemical/geological indicators of volcanism means that such proxies
are often regionally constrained (Jones, 2015; M. T. Jones et al., 2019). In
addition, paleoclimate proxies across the Paleocene–Eocene transition are
often complicated by the significant changes in sedimentation, seawater
acidification, regional uplift/subsidence, eustatic sea level, and seaway
connections. These uncertainties can only be resolved by targeted studies on
expanded and continuous sedimentary sequences proximal to the NAIP that
contain a multitude of volcanic and climatic proxies.</p>
      <p id="d1e648">The eastern North Sea basin is an ideal setting for constraining the uplift
history and magmatic activity of the NAIP across the PETM. This region has
experienced near-continuous tectonic subsidence since the Late Cretaceous,
resulting in high sedimentation rates and expanded sedimentary sequences.
The relative proximity of this basin to the NAIP (Fig. 1) resulted in the
co-preservation of multiple volcanic and climatic proxies. Additionally,
this location was sufficiently distant from LIP activity to avoid subtle
climatic indicators being overwhelmed by the volcanic signal and was
relatively unaffected by the regional forced regressions caused by thermal
uplift. The enclosed nature of the North Sea and the lack of significant
thermal or diagenetic overprints have resulted in the exceptional
preservation of both inorganic and organic records (Nielsen, 1995). These
factors make North Sea sediments ideal for a wide range of integrated
geochemical, biological, oceanographic, and volcanological studies. The
Limfjord area in Denmark (Fig. 2) offers rare onshore access to North Sea
Paleocene and Eocene strata due to glaciotectonic uplift (Pedersen, 2014).
These outcrops provide a unique opportunity to attain a high-quality,
virtually uninterrupted record of NAIP activity and environmental change
spanning the latest Paleocene and early Eocene (Heilmann-Clausen et al.,
1985).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e653"><bold>(a)</bold> A topographic map of Fur showing the
locations of the Stolleklint, Knudeklint, and quarry sections. The regional
map of Limfjorden shows the Skarrehage and Ejerslev localities on Mors and
the Silstrup locality. The Denmark map shows the line of the stratigraphic
cross-section in red between Thisted and Viborg. <bold>(b)</bold> A synthesis of
the target interval showing the Paleogene stratigraphy of northern Denmark
(Heilmann-Clausen  et al., 1985; King, 2016) in relation to the GTS2020
geological timescale (Speijer et al., 2020) and global oxygen and carbon
isotope curves (Cramer et al., 2009; Littler et al., 2014). PETM: Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum; ETM2: Eocene Thermal Maximum 2.
<bold>(c)</bold> A view of Stolleklint Beach from the north, with the outcropping
strata labelled (Stokke et al., 2021). Black lines denote key basaltic ash
layers, while white lines mark the silicic Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.
The onset, body, and recovery of the PETM CIE are highlighted in light blue.
The boundary between the Holmehus/Østerrende Formation and the
Stolleklint Clay in the cliff face obscured by slumping is inferred from
sub-beach outcrops. The map, stratigraphic log, and photo are modified from
figures in Stokke et al. (2021).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/1623/2023/cp-19-1623-2023-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e698">This study presents a compilation of new and existing proxy data for
volcanism (ash layers, Hg anomalies, Os isotopes) and paleoclimate (lipid
biomarkers and C, Li, and Os isotopes) from the Stolleklint Beach section on
Fur and other localities around the Limfjord area (Fig. 2). These
data are uniquely poised to (1) assess changes in environmental conditions
across the PETM and in the earliest Eocene, (2) investigate how the style and
magnitude of NAIP activity varied concurrently, and (3) evaluate how these
regional signals relate to global changes through comparison to existing
PETM localities worldwide.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Study area</title>
      <p id="d1e710">All of the samples used in this study were derived from the Paleogene
succession in northern Denmark (Fig. 2). Pleistocene glaciotectonism
provides valuable onshore outcrops<?pagebreak page1627?> of these Paleogene sediments, but the
associated folding and faulting often limit individual outcrops to just
part of the overall stratigraphy. However, there are over 180 NAIP ash
layers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 mm thick) found within the succession (Larsen et al.,
2003), which act as marker horizons and enable a precise correlation between
outcrops and a composite reconstruction of the whole sequence of strata. The
ashes are numbered and subdivided into a negative ash series (Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to Ash
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a positive ash series (Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 to Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>140) based on chemical
variations and outcrop appearances (Bøggild, 1918). The succession is
divided here into nine intervals, based on changes in lithology, the
presence of ash layers, and/or bulk organic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values.</p>
      <p id="d1e766">The primary locality is Stolleklint Beach on the north coast of Fur,
which contains a complete outcrop of pre-PETM to early Eocene strata (Fig. 2c). The base of the sequence comprises a heavily bioturbated, hemipelagic
mudstone devoid of carbonate microfossils, referred to here as the
Holmehus/Østerrende Formation (Interval 1) due to the uncertain lateral
extent of the Østerrende Clay (Fig. 2b; Heilmann-Clausen, 1995; Stokke
et al., 2021). The overlying unit is the Stolleklint Clay (Intervals 2 to
6), a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 m thick expanded section of dark, laminated,
thermally immature clay, almost completely devoid of benthic fauna and
calcareous fossils (Heilmann-Clausen et al., 1985). The transition from the
Holmehus/Østerrende Formation to the Stolleklint Clay is marked by a
possible hiatus of unknown duration and a glauconite-rich silty horizon
(Heilmann-Clausen, 1995; Schmitz et al., 2004), which is comprised of mainly
authigenic grains and is interpreted as evidence of very low sedimentation
rates (Schoon et al., 2015). Above this glauconite-rich horizon, there is no
clear evidence of any breaks in sedimentation until the top of the Fur
Formation (Heilmann-Clausen et al., 1985; 2014; Stokke et al., 2020a). Two
thick ash layers (named SK1 and SK2) are found at the base of the
Stolleklint Clay (Interval 2), directly below the onset of the PETM CIE.</p>
      <p id="d1e776">The sediments above Ash SK2 show the PETM onset (Interval 3), with the first
appearance of the diagnostic dinoflagellate cyst <italic>Apectodinium augustum</italic> (Heilmann-Clausen, 1994)
and a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> excursion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ over
just 11 cm of strata (M. T. Jones et al., 2019; Schoon et al., 2013). The body of
the PETM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C excursion comprises the bulk of the Stolleklint
Clay (Intervals 4 to 6), with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values largely
stable at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (M. T. Jones et al., 2019). The subdivision
of the PETM body is based on a sustained increase in TOC (total organic carbon) content at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<?pagebreak page1628?> that marks the boundary between Intervals 4 and 5 and the
re-emergence of ash layers from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m onwards that marks Interval 6. The
Stolleklint Clay is overlain by a ca. 52 m thick, fossil-rich
clayey diatomite named the Fur Formation. The PETM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
recovery (Interval 7) is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5 m thick and constrained between
Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21a (Heilmann-Clausen et al., 1985). The lower post-PETM
strata (Interval 8) contain occasional heterolithic ash layers of the
negative ash series (Larsen et al., 2003), and the diatomite displays
frequent laminations (Pedersen et al., 2004). The start of Interval 9 is
marked by the appearance of Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1, the first of 140 mainly tholeiitic
basalts of the positive ash series that corresponds to the Balder Formation
offshore (King, 2016). In contrast to much of Interval 8, the interstitial
diatomites of the positive ash series (Interval 9) are mostly non-laminated
(Pedersen et al., 2004).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Materials</title>
      <p id="d1e938">The succession was logged and sampled at several outcrops and quarries on
Fur (M. T. Jones et al., 2019; Stokke et al., 2020a), supplemented with
Skarrehage and Ejerslev localities on the island of Mors and at Silstrup in
mainland Denmark (Fig. 2a). These sequences were compiled to form a
composite stratigraphic succession where the zero of the depth scale is set
to the top of the ubiquitous and easily distinguishable felsic Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 2c). The stratigraphic thicknesses vary slightly between localities,
so sections within the composite succession are tied to specific localities.
The lowermost pre-PETM to post-PETM section (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.8 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.8 m) is based on
the Stolleklint Beach locality (M. T. Jones et al., 2019). The Elke and Stendal
East quarries (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.8 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>41.0 m) form the basis of the log between Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11 and Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>98. The uppermost part (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>41.0 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>51.0 m) is based on the
Silstrup locality (Fig. 2a).</p>
      <p id="d1e1008">The presence of abundant ash layers in the Danish strata offers insights
into the extent and style of NAIP volcanism, and they act as key marker horizons
between localities. High-precision radiometric dating of magmatic crystals
within ash deposits provides a geochronological framework into which
paleoenvironmental records can be placed (Lowe, 2011). Key felsic ash
layers in the Danish strata such as Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 are important marker
horizons across Greenland and Europe (Storey et al., 2007a; Westerhold et
al., 2009). Some of the basaltic ash layers are up to 12 cm thick and found
700–1500 km from the known source volcanoes, representing some of the
largest explosive basaltic eruptions recorded in the geological record
(Egger and Brückl, 2006; Stokke et al., 2020b). The Stolleklint Clay and
Fur Formation were systematically logged and sampled, with the thickness of
each ash layer recorded and combined into a percentage of the strata (after
compaction) per metre of section.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Mercury anomalies</title>
      <p id="d1e1037">A widely used volcanic proxy is mercury (Hg) content in sedimentary records
(Grasby et al., 2019; Percival et al., 2021). Volcanic emissions are a
primary source of gaseous Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> that is rapidly dispersed through the
atmosphere (Pyle and Mather, 2003). Prolonged periods of elevated volcanism,
such as from LIPs, directly impact the global Hg cycle (Grasby et al.,
2019). Mercury has a strong affinity for organic matter, which provides the
main depositional pathway for Hg in aqueous environments (Outridge et al.,
2007). Elevated Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC is interpreted to show
enhanced Hg sequestration, either through enrichment of Hg in organic matter
or via deposition through other means such as adhesion to clay particles or
in sulfides (Sanei et al., 2012). Therefore, anomalously high Hg content or
peaks in host-phase normalised ratios (e.g. Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC, Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> S) can be indicative
of extensive regional or global volcanic activity (Grasby et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e1070">High-resolution sampling and analyses were conducted for Hg and TOC through
the Stolleklint Clay (M. T. Jones et al., 2019) and the Fur Formation (this
study). The lowermost strata (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.8 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.3 m) were continuously sampled,
while the mean sample spacing for the rest of the stratigraphy was 8 cm
(including 425 new samples). All samples were oven-dried at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and powdered in either an agate hand mortar or agate disc mill
before further analysis. Mercury content was analysed using a Zeeman
R-915F (Lumex) high-frequency atomic absorption spectrometer at the
University of Lausanne. Samples were heated to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and measurements were taken on the direct thermal evaporation of Hg from
solid samples. Each aliquot was measured in duplicate, while machine
accuracy was confirmed by the analysis of the GSD-11 standard certified
reference material (Chinese alluvium: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">72.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb). Total organic
carbon (TOC) concentrations were obtained by Rock-Eval pyrolysis (Behar et
al., 2001) at the University of Lausanne.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Lithium isotopes </title>
      <p id="d1e1140">The ratio of lithium isotopes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Li and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Li, expressed as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li, is a tracer for silicate weathering in sedimentary records.
Lithium is abundant in silicate rocks, largely absent from carbonate rocks,
and is not known to be fractionated by organic growth (Kisakürek et al.,
2005; Pogge von Strandmann et al., 2016). As such, Li isotopes are
dominantly controlled by silicate weathering processes (Pogge von Strandmann
et al., 2021). In fluvial waters, Li isotopes reflect the balance between
primary rock dissolution and secondary clay formation. Isotopic
fractionation through clay formation increases dissolved-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li
values, whereas primary rock dissolution does not fractionate Li isotopes
and therefore drives dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li to low values (Misra and
Froelich, 2012; Pogge von Strandmann et al., 2017b). Low-intensity fluvial
weathering regimes (i.e. high erosion relative to weathering rates) are
characterised by high primary rock dissolution relative to clay formation,
leading to low dissolved-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li values but high<?pagebreak page1629?> dissolved-Li
fluxes. Moderate-intensity weathering regimes have greater clay formation
and therefore elevated dissolved-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li values but somewhat
lower dissolved-Li fluxes. High-intensity weathering regimes induce the
dissolution of secondary clays with little primary rock dissolution, which
leads to low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li values and low Li fluxes (Dellinger et al.,
2015; Pogge von Strandmann et al., 2020). In this study, we analysed the
solid (largely clay) material from the sediment sequences, providing a
counterpart to the dissolved signal. The advantage compared to marine
carbonate sections is that detrital clay sections are not affected by the
long (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 Myr) ocean residence time of Li but instead provide information
on local conditions.
Selected samples were analysed through the Stolleklint Clay (Pogge von
Strandmann et al., 2021) and the Fur Formation (this study). Powdered
samples were dissolved first using HF–HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–HClO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, then steps of
concentrated HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and 6 M HCl. The samples were then purified for Li
using a two-column method with AG 50W-X12 resin and 0.2 M HCl as an eluent
(Pogge von Strandmann et al., 2017a). The purified samples were analysed at
the LOGIC group at University College London using a Nu Plasma 3
multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (MC-ICP-MS) and
normalised to IRMM-016 bracketing standards. The measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li
values of secondary standards at this facility are seawater (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31.17</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), USGS BCR-2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.57</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and USGS SGR-1b (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The total procedural blank is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003 ng Li (Pogge von Strandmann et al., 2019). Long-term external
analytical uncertainties using this method are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Pogge von Strandmann et al., 2021).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Clay mineralogy</title>
      <p id="d1e1379">Samples from the Fur Formation were analysed for clay mineralogy to expand
on the existing dataset from Stokke et al. (2021). The clay fraction
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) was prepared as oriented aggregate mounds using
gravity settling and the Millipore filter transfer method (Moore and Reynolds,
1997). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) clay data were recorded with a step size of 0.01 from 2 to 65
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at a count time of 0.3 s (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in air-dried samples
and with a step size of 0.01 from 2 to 34 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at a count time of
0.3 s (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on treated samples. Three rounds of treatments were
applied: 24 h of ethylene glycol saturation, 1 h heating at 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and 1 h heating at 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The software NewMod II (Reynolds
and Reynolds, 2012) was used for semi-quantification of the XRD
patterns of inter-stratified clay minerals.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Rhenium and osmium isotopes</title>
      <p id="d1e1465">The osmium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os) isotope system is a powerful
paleoceanographic tracer for silicate weathering, specifically identifying
changes between evolved and juvenile sources through time
(Peucker-Ehrenbrink and Ravizza, 2000; Peucker-Ehrenbrink and Ravizza,
2020). The ratio of rhenium to osmium (Re <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Os) is higher in crustal rocks
than in the mantle, which means that the  in situ beta decay of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Re to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os
leads to higher (radiogenic) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os ratios over time. The
crustal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os average is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.40
(Peucker-Ehrenbrink and Jahn, 2001), while the unradiogenic primitive upper-mantle value is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13 (Meisel et al., 2001). The oceanic
record reflects the proportional mixing of these two end-members
(Peucker-Ehrenbrink and Ravizza, 2000), with the unradiogenic component
sourced from the weathering and alteration of subaerial basalts, submarine
hydrothermal activity (Dickson et al., 2021), and occasional
extraterrestrial bolide impacts (Sato et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e1584">Osmium is removed from the water column through the precipitation of Fe–Mn
oxides and/or adsorption onto organic material and clays
(Racionero-Gómez et al., 2017; Yamashita et al., 2007). The oceanic
residence time of Os is 10–55 kyr (Levasseur et al., 1999; Sharma et al.,
1997), which is longer than the present-day mixing time of the oceans (1–2 kyr) but considerably shorter than for other weathering tracers such as
strontium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 Myr) (Broeker and Peng, 1982). While the global
oceans are relatively homogeneous at a given time, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os
ratios can deviate rapidly from the fully mixed global signal in restricted
environments such as enclosed basins (Rooney et al., 2016). Enhanced organic
matter deposition can reduce Os residence times significantly, and local
input and output fluxes become more important in enclosed settings (Martin
et al., 2001; Paquay and Ravizza, 2012). Therefore, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os proxy has multiple potential uses in this study,
including tracking the emplacement and weathering of NAIP lavas and ashes;
changes in continental weathering associated with regional uplift or
climatic variations; and modifications to the extent of seaway connectivity
between the North Sea basin and the Arctic, Tethys, and Atlantic realms.</p>
      <p id="d1e1645">Individual samples weighing ca. 50 g were selected for Os isotope
chemostratigraphy analysis throughout the succession. Consolidated samples
were cut using a rock saw and then hand-polished with a diamond-plated
polishing pad to remove potential contamination from the saw blade and
weathered surfaces. After being dried at room temperature overnight, all
samples were crushed to a fine (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) powder in a SPEX
8500 ShatterBox with a ceramic agate grinding container and puck to
homogenise any potential Re and Os heterogeneity. The long half-life of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Re (ca. 42 Gyr) leads to minimal age correction for Cenozoic
samples, but both Re and Os concentrations and isotopic compositions were
measured in this study to provide accurate initial Os isotope compositions
for chemostratigraphy.</p>
      <p id="d1e1672">Sample Re and Os isotopic abundance and composition were determined at the
Yale Geochemistry and Geochronology Center. Depending on Re concentration,
between 0.3 and 1.0 g of sample powder was digested and equilibrated in 8 mL
of Cr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VI</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with a mixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">190</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">185</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Re
tracer (spike) solution sealed in Carius tubes at 220 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 48 h.<?pagebreak page1630?> This dissolution method has been shown to preferentially liberate
hydrogenous Re and Os to yield a more accurate and precise depositional age
(Kendall et al., 2004). The Re and Os were extracted and purified through
solvent extraction (NaOH, (CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>CO, and CHCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>),
micro-distillation, and anion column chromatography and analysed using negative
thermal ionisation mass spectrometry (Selby and Creaser, 2003). Isotopic
measurements were performed via static Faraday collection for Re and
ion counting using a secondary-electron multiplier in peak-hopping mode for
Os on a ThermoElectron TRITON PLUS mass spectrometer (Creaser et al., 1991;
Völkening et al., 1991). The Os samples were loaded onto 99.995 % Pt
wire (H-Cross, NJ) in 9 N HBr, covered with a saturated solution of
Ba(OH)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in 0.1 N NaOH as an activator, and analysed as oxides of Os.
Interference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>ReO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>OsO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was corrected using
the measured intensity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">185</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>ReO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Mass fractionation was
corrected with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">192</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.0826 using the exponential
fractionation law.</p>
      <p id="d1e1863">In-house Re and Os solutions were continuously analysed during this study to
ensure and monitor long-term mass spectrometer reproducibility. The Yale
Geochemistry and Geochronology Center Re standard solution measured on the
Faraday cups yields an average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">185</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Re <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Re value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59748</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0014</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which agrees with the accepted value
within error (Gramlich et al., 1973). The measured difference between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">185</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Re <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Re values for the Re solution and the accepted value
(0.59738) is used to correct the Re sample data. The Os isotope standard
solution used at Yale Metal Isotope Center is the Durham Romil Osmium
Standard (DROsS) (Luguet et al., 2008). Over the past 3 years on the
Yale Triton, the runs have yielded a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16082</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.000116</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">319</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is identical, within uncertainty, to
the value reported by other laboratories (e.g. Liu and Pearson, 2014; Luguet
et al., 2008). Total procedural blanks during this study were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pg for Re and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pg for Os, with an average
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e2075">Uncertainties for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Re <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os are
determined by error propagation of uncertainties in Re and Os mass
spectrometry measurements, blank abundances and isotopic compositions, spike
calibrations, and reproducibility of standard Re and Os isotopic values. The
Re–Os isotopic data and 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated uncertainties for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Re <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os are used to generate initial
Os isotope (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compositions with an age of 55.9 Ma.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>Seaway connectivity proxies</title>
      <p id="d1e2237">The extent of North Sea isolation may be tested using existing datasets of
Os isotopes (see above) and thaumarchaeotal membrane lipid distributions. The
composition of isoprenoid glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraether lipids
(GDGTs) is thought to regulate membrane fluidity of marine Thaumarchaeota
(Schouten et al., 2013). As such, GDGT composition is commonly assumed to be
largely governed by growth temperature and forms the basis of the TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
paleotemperature proxy (Schouten et al., 2002). Typically, the number of
cyclo-pentane rings increases with temperature, with the TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio
presenting the statistically strongest relation (Kim et al., 2010; Schouten
et al., 2002). However, other metrics, such as the ring index (Zhang et al.,
2016) and fractional abundance of crenarchaeol regio-isomers (fcren')
relative to total crenarchaeol (O'Brien et al., 2017), can be employed to
detect non-thermal impact on TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Zhang et al., 2016) and differences
in temperature response between communities (e.g. Inglis et al., 2015;
O'Brien et al., 2017). Indeed, it has been recognised that certain modern
ocean regions have distinct GDGT distributions and responses to temperature,
arguably associated with distinct, isolated communities of Thaumarchaeota
(e.g. Trommer et al., 2009). Some studies have turned this around to argue
for distinct communities based on GDGT distributions in (semi-)restricted
settings (Steinig et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e2267">High fcren' has been recognised in (warm) saline waters (Steinig et al.,
2020; Trommer et al., 2009) and has been proposed to identify such
paleoenvironmental conditions (Inglis et al., 2015). In contrast, many
freshwater bodies are marked by reduced fcren' (e.g. Blaga et al., 2009;
Powers et al., 2010). At times during the latest Paleocene–early Eocene,
reduced-salinity water masses occupied the North Sea area (Bujak and Mudge,
1994; Eldrett et al., 2014; Kender et al., 2012; Zacke et al., 2009) and the
Arctic Ocean (Pagani et al., 2006; Sluijs et al., 2006). Here we re-examine
the published Paleocene–Eocene GDGT data, including those from the North
Sea area, focusing on the differences in response to PETM warming between
TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and fcren' to assess whether GDGT distributions can be used as a
supporting tool to detect basin restriction and/or reduced salinity.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Volcanic ash layers</title>
      <p id="d1e2295">The NAIP ash layers are largely constrained to discreet ash-rich intervals
within the Stolleklint Clay and Fur Formation. Four ashes (SK1–SK4) are
found just above and below the PETM onset (Fig. 3b), representing the
earliest evidence of explosive volcanism in Danish strata (Heilmann-Clausen
et al., 2014). There is a distinct lack of visible ash layers for a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.3 m interval between the PETM onset and Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>39, the
first of the traditional numbered ash series (Fig. 3a). The second
interval of ash-rich strata (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.9 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.9 m) encompasses the recovery of
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> excursion and includes several felsic ash
layers such as Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17. It is followed by a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 m
thick ash-poor interval, with only three ash layers <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 cm
thickness. Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26.0 m heralds the main phase of ash deposition in
the Fur Formation (Fig. 3a). With the exception of the felsic Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13 and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19, the positive ash series comprises relatively homogenous
tholeiitic<?pagebreak page1631?> basalts. Basaltic ash reaches a peak of 31 % of the total
sediment (after compaction) between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>42.0 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>43.0 m (Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>110 to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>118; Fig. 3a), representing a considerable portion of the total
stratigraphy.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2435">Composite data from the studied outcrops. <bold>(a)</bold> The
full succession from late Paleocene to Eocene strata, with the zero on the
depth scale set to the top of Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33. <bold>(b)</bold> The first metre of the
condensed Stolleklint Beach section. Note the change in scale for some
proxies. The glauconite-rich horizon is marked in the lower stratigraphic
log, along with ash layers SK1 to SK4 (Stokke et al., 2021). The age model
is based on four marker horizons: the PETM onset at 55.93 Ma (Westerhold et
al., 2017), a 101 kyr PETM body duration (van der Meulen et al., 2020), the
corrected Ar–Ar age of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma for Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17 (Storey et al.,
2007a), and an estimated age of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 55.28 Ma for Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 based
on an estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 kyr interval between Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19
(Röhl et al., 2007; Westerhold et al., 2009). The top of the Fur
Formation is older than 54.6 Ma (King, 2016). The “ash thicknesses” column
shows the percentage of sediment (after compaction) that is volcanic ash for
each metre of strata. Black bars denote basaltic ashes, while grey bars
denote felsic ashes. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data are from previous
studies (M. T. Jones et al., 2019; Schoon et al., 2013), with the red infill
denoting the PETM CIE. The sea surface temperature (SST) estimates using the
TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> proxy and bottom water temperatures from clumped isotopes of
glendonite calcite are plotted from previous studies (Schoon et al., 2015;
Stokke et al., 2020a; Vickers et al., 2020). The mercury (Hg) and total
organic carbon (TOC) concentrations are a combination of this study and
M. T. Jones et al. (2019). Lithium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li) isotopes are from this
study and Pogge von Strandmann et al. (2021). The osmium (Os) isotopes show
initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os values at 55.9 Ma
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). The succession is divided into nine
distinct intervals based on lithological changes and variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values: (1) the late Paleocene Holmehus/Østerrende
Formation, (2) the pre-PETM, (3) the PETM onset, (4) the lower part of the PETM
body, (5) the middle part of the PETM body, (6) the ash-rich upper part of the
PETM body, (7) the PETM recovery, (8) the lower part of the Fur Formation, and
(9) the upper part of the Fur Formation (see also Table 1).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/1623/2023/cp-19-1623-2023-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Sedimentary mercury</title>
      <p id="d1e2646">Mercury concentrations vary from 2 to 303 ppb through the succession, but
within each interval Hg content is relatively consistent (Table 1).
Mercury peaks are few and limited in amplitude, with only four samples
exceeding 100 ppb. Mercury content was also normalised to TOC and plotted as
Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC (Fig. 3). Samples where TOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 wt % were excluded
from Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC ratios as the propagated error creates unacceptably high
uncertainties (Grasby et al., 2019). The intervals where this occurs are in
the glauconite-rich layer at the top of Interval 1 (Fig. 3b) and in part
of the diatomite-rich Fur Formation (Intervals 7–9; Fig. 3a). The late Paleocene and pre-PETM strata (Intervals 1 and 2) have relatively low mean
Hg content values of 32.5 and 30.0 ppb, respectively (Table 1). When Hg is
normalised to TOC, the late Paleocene strata are relatively uniform (Interval 1), while the pre-PETM strata (Interval 2) show more scatter and sporadic
Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC anomalies (Fig. 3b). Mercury content increases slightly across the
PETM onset (Interval 3) to an average of 43.8 ppb (Table 1), but a
concurrent increase in TOC content leads to lowered Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC values compared
to the interval below.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2687">Compilation of the average Hg content (ppb), Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC
ratios (ppb wt %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and Hg accumulation rates (Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the nine
distinct intervals of the stratigraphy. The sediment densities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
taken from Pedersen et al. (2004), with the PETM recovery assumed to be a
mix between the shale and diatomite. SR: sedimentation rate. Italics
denote poorly constrained estimates. Bold text denotes data of key interest.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.72}[.72]?><oasis:tgroup cols="17">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="16" colname="col16" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="17" colname="col17" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col8" align="center" colsep="1">Hg (ppb) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col9" nameend="col12" align="center">Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC (ppb wt %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">SR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ash interval</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lower depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Upper depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Thickness</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Min</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Min</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">(g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">(cm kyr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(ng cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Below ash SK1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>32.5</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>78.1</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">164</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">23.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">?</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>?</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ashes SK1–SK2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>30.0</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>86.8</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">130</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">23.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">?</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>?</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ashes SK2–SK4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>40.4</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">14.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>58.1</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">158</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">45.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.12</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lower PETM CIE (Int. 4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>37.1</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">110</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">14.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>33.8</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">10.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">23.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>1.24</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Middle PETM CIE (Int. 5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>60.4</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>26.9</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">23.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>2.01</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>67.7</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">227</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">35.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>51.7</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">324</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">61.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">23.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>2.26</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>37.6</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">16.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>84.6</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">164</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">36.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><italic>1.1</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">2.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.12</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21a to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>39.4</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">14.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>86.1</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">167</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">49.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">2.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.09</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>47.7</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">303</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">29.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>102.5</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">608</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">68.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">9.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.34</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>33.7</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">33.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>81.5</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">115</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">16.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">9.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.24</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>118</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">42.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>23.5</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>78.4</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">152</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">29.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><italic>9.0</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold><italic>0.17</italic></bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>118 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>140</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">42.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">51.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>30.0</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>50.9</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">112</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">20.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><italic>9.0</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold><italic>0.22</italic></bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{1}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3852">Within the PETM body, Hg becomes increasingly enriched upwards through the strata, with
the largest mean concentrations observed in Interval 6 (67.7 ppb; Table 1).
This concentration is comparable to the average shale value (62.4 ppb) from
a compilation of global datasets (Grasby et al., 2019). In the lower and
middle parts of the PETM (Intervals 4 and 5), the Hg content covaries with
TOC enrichments, resulting in an average Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC ratio of 33.8 ppb wt %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.0) for Interval 4 and 26.9 ppb wt %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
for Interval 5. The low standard deviations highlight that Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC values are
remarkably uniform through Intervals 4 and 5 (Table 1). The relative
homogeneity ends in the final 5.6 m of the PETM body (Interval 6), where Hg
enrichments outpace increased TOC content, coincident with the re-emergence
of ash layers in the stratigraphy (Fig. 3a). The PETM recovery (Interval 7) heralds a decrease in Hg and TOC concentrations into the diatomitic Fur
Formation. Mercury content rises again slightly into Interval 8, becoming
more pronounced in the section between Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1, with a mean Hg
content of 47 ppb (Table 1). Variable TOC enrichments in Interval 8 lead to
a large scatter in Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC ratios (Fig. 3a). Mercury and TOC content
gradually declines into Interval 9, reaching a nadir (mean 21.4 ppb Hg) in
the strata between Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>118, with many samples <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 wt % TOC. Mercury and TOC content slightly increases again towards the top
of the section exposed at Silstrup, but Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC ratios are comparable to much
of the rest of the Fur Formation (Fig. 3a).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Lithium isotopes</title>
      <p id="d1e3974">There are significant variations in detrital Li isotopes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li)
through the studied section. Within the late Paleocene and pre-PETM strata
(Intervals 1 and 2), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li values are typically between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1 ‰ and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 ‰. The two samples encompassing the negative
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C onset (at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.37 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.26 m) show a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.9 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li excursion (Fig. 3b),
accompanied by a TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C sea
surface temperature (SST) warming across the same interval (Schoon et al.,
2015; Stokke et al., 2020a). The Li isotopes gradually return to less
negative values through the course of the PETM body, returning to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7 ‰ by the end of Interval 6 (Fig. 3a). Lithium
isotope values then oscillate from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.4 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 and back to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.2 ‰ through the PETM recovery (Interval 7). The
post-PETM strata (Interval 8) first show a gradual positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li excursion, peaking at 0.5 ‰ at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 m above Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3a). There is then a progressive negative
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li excursion to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.0 ‰ just above Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9. The remaining samples from the upper Fur Formation between Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>31
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>98 (Interval 9) have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li values between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.8 and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.4 ‰.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Rhenium and osmium isotopes</title>
      <p id="d1e4212">The Re and Os abundances and isotopic compositions vary considerably in the
studied samples. Elemental Re and Os abundances range from 0.9 to 196.4 ppb
and 54 to 1009 ppt, respectively (Table 2). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Re <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os ratios
vary between 18 and 2498, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os ratios vary from 0.336
to 2.593. Rhenium and Os enrichments appear to covary with TOC content, with
the PETM interval showing elevated element abundances compared to pre- and
post-PETM strata (Table 2). Using an assigned age of 55.9 Ma, calculated
initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) range
from 0.258 to 1.110, with significant and systematic changes through the
stratigraphy. The late Paleocene samples (Interval 1) are consistently
unradiogenic, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values between 0.26 and
0.40 (Table 2, Fig. 3b). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are
lower in the ash-bearing pre-PETM strata (Interval 2), consistently between
0.27 and 0.29. The PETM onset (Interval 3) is marked by an increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values from 0.27 to 0.39. Throughout the body
of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C excursion (Intervals 4–6), the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values remain unradiogenic (0.30–0.39) and
remarkably stable for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 m of stratigraphy (Table 2).
However, the PETM recovery samples (Interval 7) exhibit an extreme change in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values from 0.3 to 0.83 across a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 m interval containing the felsic Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3a). This
more radiogenic signature persists throughout the Fur Formation, albeit with
considerable variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.49–1.11).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e4607">Rhenium and osmium geochemistry for the studied
strata. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Total organic carbon (TOC) content (M. T. Jones et al., 2019)
shown for reference. Bold text denotes data of key interest.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.78}[.78]?><oasis:tgroup cols="15">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Interval no.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Age</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">TOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Re</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Os</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">192</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Re <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(wt %)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(ppb)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(ppt)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(ppt)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(55.9 Ma)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Late Paleocene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">142.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">56.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">162.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.498</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.347</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Late Paleocene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">146.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">57.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">128.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.523</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.403</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Late Paleocene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">209.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">84.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">77.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.341</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.268</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Late Paleocene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">172.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">68.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">136.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.450</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.324</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Late Paleocene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">156.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">62.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">136.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.386</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.258</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Late Paleocene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">117.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">46.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">90.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.385</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.301</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Pre-PETM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">218.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">87.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">75.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.352</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.282</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Pre-PETM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">184.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">73.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">109.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.370</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.269</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Pre-PETM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">211.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">84.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">74.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.336</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.267</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Pre-PETM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">185.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">74.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">73.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.354</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.286</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Pre-PETM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">209.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">84.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">74.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.341</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.271</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM onset</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">196.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">500.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">156.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2498.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">8.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">2.593</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.265</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM onset</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">31.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">310.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">117.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">535.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.801</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.302</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM onset</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">383.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">147.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">322.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.670</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.370</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM body</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">343.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">132.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">267.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.635</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.386</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM body</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">362.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">139.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">335.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.672</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.359</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM body</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">25.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">353.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">136.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">377.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.695</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.343</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM body</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">36.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">434.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">165.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">441.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.783</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.371</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM body</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">312.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">119.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">370.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.732</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.386</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM body</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">27.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">310.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">117.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">461.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.818</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.388</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM body</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">34.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">383.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">145.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">470.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.786</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.347</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM body</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">40.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">450.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">170.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">466.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.816</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.381</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM body</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">44.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">513.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">194.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">456.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.807</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.382</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM body</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">37.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">417.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">158.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">463.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.779</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.347</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM body</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">74.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">591.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">219.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">670.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.984</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.359</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM body</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">76.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">644.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">242.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">628.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.886</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.301</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM recovery</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">560.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">210.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">65.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.888</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.826</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PETM recovery</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">96.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">35.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">374.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.159</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.811</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Early Eocene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">189.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">795.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">265.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1417.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.947</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.626</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">15.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Early Eocene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1009.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">366.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.174</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>1.110</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">27.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Early Eocene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">250.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">98.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">18.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.506</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.490</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">34.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Early Eocene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">54.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">97.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.636</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.540</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">41.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Early Eocene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">215.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">79.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">86.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><bold>0.960</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{2}?></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page1632?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Geochronology and accumulation rates</title>
      <p id="d1e6786">Absolute age estimates allow for the quantification of sediment deposition
rates for environmental proxies such as TOC and Hg. A robust
geochronological framework is achievable for the Stolleklint Clay due to the
clear onset, body, and recovery of the PETM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C excursion and
for parts of the Fur Formation due to the prevalence of ash layers that act
as key marker horizons (Westerhold et al., 2009). In contrast, the
chronology of the pre-PETM strata is poorly constrained due to intense
bioturbation and a potential unconformity below the glauconite-rich horizon.</p>
      <p id="d1e6800"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Sedimentation rates during the PETM can be estimated by two methods. The
first method uses the estimated durations of the PETM onset and body from
astronomically calibrated localities and modelling. If the 11 cm of
preserved strata is the entire PETM onset (Fig. 3b), and assuming a
maximum duration of 5 kyr for this interval (Kirtland Turner, 2018), the
minimum average sedimentation rates at the start of the hyperthermal were
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.2 cm kyr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 1). For the PETM body, van der
Meulen et al. (2020) predict a CIE duration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">101</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kyr. Including
propagated uncertainties, this duration gives an average sedimentation rate
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm kyr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, up to an order of magnitude greater than the
sedimentation rate during the onset interval (Table 1). The alternative
method is to use marker horizons of known ages. The PETM onset is
constrained by astronomical tuning to 55.93 Ma, based on the best-fit
orbital solution of Westerhold et al. (2017). A bentonite horizon within the
PETM CIE in Svalbard has a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U age of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55.785</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.034</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma (Charles et al., 2011), estimated to be equivalent to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 m
above Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33 in the Danish strata (Stokke et al., 2020a). Using these two
ages gives a sedimentation rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm kyr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, including
uncertainties in the thickness of the Stolleklint Clay and the position of
the Svalbard marker horizon in the Fur strata. The slight disparity between
these two sedimentation rate estimates may arise because the latter value
includes part of the PETM recovery, where deposition rates were reduced at
Fur. O<?pagebreak page1634?>verall, the two methods are in good agreement, and we base our age
model on the former estimate.</p>
      <p id="d1e6936">Estimating Fur Formation deposition rates is aided by the presence of
numerous ash layers, which have been correlated with tuff horizons within the
East Greenland flood basalts at the Gronau Nunatak (Heister et al., 2001;
Storey et al., 2007a), offshore along the north-western Europe continental
margin of Goban Spur (DSDP Site 550), and the Norwegian continental margin
(ODP Site 642; Fig. 1) (Knox, 1984, 1985). In particular, two
prominent felsic ash layers (Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19) are used to constrain the
geochronology of the early Eocene. Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was Ar–Ar-dated to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma once corrected using the 28.201 Ma Fish Canyon Tuff calibration
(Kuiper et al., 2008; Storey et al., 2007a). Astronomical tuning using
records from Site 550 and the Walvis Ridge (ODP Sites 1262 and 1263) predicts a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 kyr interval between the two ashes (Röhl et al.,
2007; Westerhold et al., 2009), which gives an estimated age of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 55.28 Ma for Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 (Fig. 3). The measured thickness
between Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17 and Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 based on the Stolleklint and Elke outcrops is
18.67 m, or 18.02 m excluding ash intervals, which gives an estimated
deposition rate of 9.0 cm kyr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for this section of the Fur Formation (Table 1).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Constraining NAIP activity</title>
      <p id="d1e7043">The main proxies for the eruption style and intensity of NAIP activity are
ash deposition, Os isotope chemostratigraphy, clay mineralogy, and Hg
anomalies, and each of these proxies has its strengths and weaknesses. Ash
layers are conclusive evidence of explosive eruptions. However, the eastern
North Sea is 700–1500 km from the known NAIP source volcanoes (Fig. 1),
which means that only the largest explosive eruptions are preserved in
Danish strata. Several ashes show evidence of magma–water interactions in
their formation (Stokke et al., 2020b), suggesting that phreatomagmatic
processes led to the explosive nature of eruptions. Therefore, while the
distribution of ashes is a clear indicator of extreme explosive volcanism,
it may reflect changes in eruption style and may not be indicative of
overall volcanic activity. Osmium isotopes can be used as a passive tracer
for the weathering and erosion of LIP basalts and ashes affecting ocean
chemistry, providing the signal is discernible from other factors such as
changing continental weathering and other sources of unradiogenic Os such as
extraterrestrial inputs and mid-ocean-ridge spreading (Dickson et al.,
2021). Another indicator of the weathering and erosion of LIP basalts and
ash is the presence of the minerals smectite and zeolite (Nielsen et al.,
2015; Stefánsson and Gíslason, 2001). While clay mineralogy is
affected by changes in climate and hydrology, the presence of both smectite
and zeolite minerals in variable abundance throughout the Fur stratigraphy
has been linked mainly to weathering of volcanic products of NAIP origin
(Heilmann-Clausen et al., 1985; Stokke et al., 2021) rather than to
reworking of smectite-rich sediments (Li et al., 2020) or post-deposition
flocculation (Deconinck and Chamley, 1995).</p>
      <p id="d1e7046">Sedimentary mercury is generally accepted as a viable proxy for large-scale
volcanism in the geological record, with Hg and Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC anomalies coeval with
periods of (subaerial) LIP emplacement (Grasby et al., 2019). However, other
factors can impact Hg and TOC content non-uniformly (Grasby et al., 2019;
Percival et al., 2015; Frieling et al., 2023), so it is important to
rigorously assess individual localities taking these factors into account.
Directly comparing (normalised) Hg records between localities is complicated
by differences in depositional environments, such as organic matter source
and content, lithology, sediment accumulation rates, and redox state (Grasby
et al., 2019). It is also currently challenging to differentiate between
thermogenic and volcanic sources for Hg in the sedimentary record, since
both are large potential Hg sources (Svensen et al., 2023). The regional distribution of Hg
emissions would be heavily affected by whether Hg degassing is subaerial or
submarine (M. T. Jones et al., 2019; Percival et al., 2018). Passive submarine
degassing around modern volcanic systems can limit Hg deposition to just
tens of kilometres from the source in enclosed, shallow marine environments (e.g.
Tomiyasu et al., 2007), so the depth and explosivity of submarine emissions
will have a major impact on subsequent Hg dispersal. Thermogenic degassing
from the NAIP was most likely dominated by explosive shallow marine venting
(Svensen et al., 2004), which may suggest that Hg anomalies proximal to the
NAIP are more likely to be of contact metamorphic origin. However, given
that widespread sill intrusions and continental flood basalts are both
chronologically constrained to somewhere in this time interval and that the
ratio of submarine versus subaerial Hg emissions for each source is poorly
constrained, the Hg record can only give an overall qualitative indicator of
NAIP activity across this interval.</p>
      <p id="d1e7056">Existing data across the PETM suggest larger Hg anomalies closer to the
NAIP (M. T. Jones et al., 2019; Keller et al., 2018; Kender et al., 2021; Liu et
al., 2019; Tremblin et al., 2022), indicating that subaqueous emissions from
volcanic and/or thermogenic sources may well have limited Hg deposition to
more proximal settings than from atmospheric distribution. In fact, even
within the North Sea basin there appears to be a substantial gradient in the
magnitude and frequency of Hg anomalies, decreasing in intensity from
north-west to south-east (M. T. Jones et al., 2019; Kender et al., 2021).
Therefore, the Danish strata do not experience significant Hg anomalies
compared to more proximal localities. However, what the Fur succession does
have is an expanded sedimentary sequence and a well-constrained
geochronology, which allows us to estimate Hg mass accumulation rates
(Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) using Eq. (1):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M426" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.2}{9.2}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ng</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ng</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where  Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean measured Hg concentration,  SR is the estimated
sedimentation rate, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the density of the<?pagebreak page1635?> host sediments. The
density of the Stolleklint Clay is measured as 1.4 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the Fur
Formation diatomite has a measured density of 0.8 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pedersen et
al., 2004). The calculated  Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values for each interval are shown in
Table 1.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>5.1.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Late Paleocene (Holmehus/{\O}sterrende Formation), Interval~1}?><title>Late Paleocene (Holmehus/Østerrende Formation), Interval 1</title>
      <p id="d1e7236">There are no ash deposits in the Holmehus or Østerrende clays in Denmark
(Heilmann-Clausen et al., 2014), but occasional ash layers are present in
the coeval Lista Formation in the North Sea (Haaland et al., 2000; Knox and
Morton, 1988). Both Hg and TOC are relatively uniform up until the base of
the glauconite-rich horizon (Fig. 3b). Mean Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC values are 78.1 ppb wt % (Table 1), comparable to the average of published shale datasets
(Grasby et al., 2019). Global ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os values were low
during the late Paleocene (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and considerably more unradiogenic than present-day values of 1.06 (Dickson et
al., 2021). These values imply that mantle sources were already a major
component of global Os fluxes, including basalt weathering from ongoing NAIP
activity and the earlier tropical emplacement of the Deccan Traps at
66.5–65 Ma (Schoene et al., 2019). Late Paleocene sediments in the North
Sea have abundant smectite and zeolite mineral components (Nielsen et al.,
2015; Stokke et al., 2021), potentially indicating extensive weathering and
denudation of basaltic material into the epicontinental sea. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the Holmehus/Østerrende Formation
are variable between 0.40 and 0.27, becoming more unradiogenic towards the
glauconite-rich horizon (Table 2, Fig. 3). This finding suggests that low-level NAIP activity was occurring in the late Paleocene and potentially
increasing into the latest Paleocene, consistent with the estimated magmatic
activity of the NAIP at this time (Wilkinson et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>5.1.2</label><title>Pre-PETM (Stolleklint Clay), Interval 2</title>
      <p id="d1e7365">The latest Paleocene section at Fur is a condensed interval of just 20 cm,
12 cm of which is made up of the ash layers SK1 and SK2 (Fig. 3b). These ashes mark
the first explosive eruptions that were large enough to reach Denmark
(Heilmann-Clausen et al., 2014). The interstitial sediments between the
thick ash layers also appear to have a large ash component (Stokke et al.,
2021). Mercury concentrations are not elevated with respect to the
underlying strata, but Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC values are consistently high, with a mean of
86.8 ppb wt %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 1, Fig. 4). Osmium isotopes are extremely low in
this interval, with a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.275 (Table 2,
Fig. 3b). A pre-PETM shift to unradiogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os values
has been noted elsewhere, particularly at Svalbard (Wieczorek et al., 2013)
and Millville, New Jersey (Liu et al., 2019). This apparent global pulse of
unradiogenic Os to the marine realm was most likely of NAIP origin (Dickson
et al., 2021), as the negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os excursions in Svalbard
and Fur are accompanied by Hg anomalies in the interstitial sediments that
predate the PETM CIE (M. T. Jones et al., 2019). In addition, the clay mineral
smectite comprises 38 % of the mineralogy in Interval 2 at Fur
(Heilmann-Clausen et al., 1985; Stokke et al., 2021), suggesting a
significant input of weathered basaltic material.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e7480">Left: a comparison of mercury (Hg) to total organic
carbon (TOC) data for the Holmehus/Østerrende Formation (late Paleocene)
and the Stolleklint Clay (pre-PETM onset and body) compared with the Upper
Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay (southern England), which is an organic-rich shale
control site that was not associated with LIP volcanism (Percival et al.,
2015). Right: a probability density diagram for Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC ratios in the
Stolleklint Clay (red) and the Kimmeridge Clay (grey).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/1623/2023/cp-19-1623-2023-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>5.1.3</label><title>PETM onset (Stolleklint Clay), Interval 3</title>
      <p id="d1e7504">The PETM onset at Fur is bounded by
Ash SK2 and the much thinner SK3 and SK4
layers that are the last ash occurrences for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 m of strata
(Fig. 3), suggesting either that explosive volcanism decreased in
magnitude to not transport ash as far or that there was a period of
explosive volcanic quiescence. Trace metals typically associated with
volcanic ash such as Ni, Cu, and V are not enriched in the sediments in this
interval (Stokke et al., 2021). Aside from the sample directly above Ash
SK2, there are no Hg anomalies, and Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC values are reduced compared to
pre-PETM strata (Table 1, Fig. 3b). Calculated Hg deposition rates
(Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, using Eq. 1) are 0.12 ng cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, assuming the onset is
complete and 5 kyr in duration (Fig. 5). This rate is less than the Hg
deposition rates of 0.7 to 1.6 ng cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated for the unpolluted
Holocene (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 CE) Baltic Sea (Frieling et al., 2023) but greater
than the estimated 0.05 to 0.1 ng cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of atmospheric Hg deposition
in Swedish Holocene peat bogs (Bindler, 2003). The lack of Hg anomalies
during the PETM onset may suggest a period of volcanic quiescence, or
perhaps a shift to subaqueous Hg emissions (either volcanic or thermogenic)
became more dominant, thereby affecting more NAIP-proximal localities than
Denmark (M. T. Jones et al., 2019; Kender et al., 2021).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e7612">Volcanic proxies through the studied section, normalised
to their estimated depositional age based on the age model shown in Fig. 3. <bold>(a)</bold> Carbon isotopes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) for reference
(M. T. Jones et al., 2019), showing the PETM CIE from 55.93–55.83 Ma.
<bold>(b)</bold> Ash thicknesses as a combined percentage of ash (after
compaction) per metre of sediment. Black bars denote basaltic ashes, and the
grey bars denote felsic ashes. <bold>(c)</bold> Initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os
isotopes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(d)</bold> Estimated Hg
accumulation rates (Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), subdivided into specific intervals. The
volcanic proxy records below the glauconite-rich layer are not shown due to
uncertainties in the timing of deposition, while  Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the
youngest part of the strata are uncertain due to poorly constrained
sedimentation rates above Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/1623/2023/cp-19-1623-2023-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e7744">The Os isotope record shows a pronounced (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1) radiogenic shift
through the PETM onset (Fig. 3b), which has also been noted at other
localities worldwide (Dickson et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2019; Ravizza et
al., 2001; Wieczorek et al., 2013). This change has been interpreted to
record enhanced continental weathering in response to warmer conditions and
a more vigorous hydrological cycle (Dickson et al., 2015; Pujalte et al.,
2015; Ravizza et al., 2001). This hypothesis is corroborated by large
changes in clay assemblages, Li isotopes, and surface temperature proxies
across the CIE onset at Fur (Fig. 3b) (Pogge von Strandmann et al., 2021;
Schoon et al., 2015; Stokke et al., 2021, 2020a). The shift
to radiogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os values suggests that an increase in
submarine volcanism is unlikely during the onset. The rapidity of the change
in Os isotopes is also notable, as the<?pagebreak page1636?> onset duration (Kirtland Turner,
2018) is less than the modern oceanic residence time of Os (10–55 kyr; Levasseur et al., 1999; Sharma et al., 1997). Changes on such a timescale
suggest not only that Os inputs changed across the PETM onset but also
that marine Os export may have increased rapidly due to enhanced
sedimentation rates and organic matter burial.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS4">
  <label>5.1.4</label><title>PETM body (Stolleklint Clay), Intervals 4–6</title>
      <p id="d1e7787">Evidence for explosive volcanic activity during the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 m
PETM body is limited to the lowermost 12 cm (Ashes SK3 and SK4) and
uppermost 5 m (Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of strata. The sediments in between
(Intervals 4 and 5) have no macroscopic ashes. However, a large zeolite
component (up to 36.1 % of bulk mineralogy) in this interval suggests
continued weathering of volcanic material in sediment source areas (Stokke
et al., 2021), and Os isotopes show a mantle-dominated signature of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 (Fig. 3). The Hg and TOC signal in this interval is
noteworthy as their covariance results in remarkably stable Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC ratios
(Fig. 3), indicating that the Hg cycle was coupled to TOC deposition and
was in a steady state. The Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC values are lower than both the pre- and
post-PETM sequences (Table 1), which at first glance suggests low volcanic
activity. However, when compared to the Upper Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay, which
was deposited under similar conditions (i.e. anoxic, high productivity)
during a period with no LIP activity (Percival et al., 2015), the Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC
ratios in the Stolleklint Clay are considerably elevated (Fig. 4). It is
also conceivable that the rapid sedimentation rates and high TOC content
led to suppressed Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC anomalies during the PETM.</p>
      <p id="d1e7853">Using a sedimentation rate of 23.8 cm kyr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, based on an estimated PETM body
duration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">101</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kyr (van der Meulen et al., 2020), and a mean Hg
content of 52.8 ppb through Intervals 4–6 gives an estimated Hg mass
accumulation rate (Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 1.76 ng cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This rate is an order of
magnitude higher than the estimated  Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the PETM onset and
considerably higher than those calculated for the Holocene (Bindler, 2003;
Frieling et al., 2023). The general trend through the PETM body is of
increasing Hg content up-section, which outpaced concomitant TOC increases
in Interval 6, leading to the highest mean Hg content and discrete Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC
anomalies coincident with the re-emergence of ash layers in the stratigraphy
(Fig. 3). Assuming constant sedimentation rates, we calculate Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to be
1.24 ng cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Interval 4 (lower PETM body), 2.01 ng cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
for Interval 5 (middle PETM body), and 2.26 ng cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Interval 6
(upper PETM body; Table 1, Fig. 5). If an average Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.76 ng cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the PETM body is indicative of the whole North Sea
basin at this time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), it would result in
annual deposition of 8.8 t of Hg into this epicontinental sea and a
total of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 Mt Hg deposition across the duration of the
PETM body. This is likely a conservative estimate, given that more proximal
sites have higher Hg content and that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 m deposition during
the PETM body is not unusual in this basin (Jin et al., 2022). The
calculated Hg accumulation flux for the North Sea is 1.3 %–12 % of current
(albeit poorly constrained) estimates of modern global volcanic Hg<?pagebreak page1637?> emissions
(Grasby et al., 2019, and references therein), despite representing just
0.1% of the Earth's surface area.</p>
      <p id="d1e8076">High Hg deposition rates during the CIE body are substantiated by sediments
in Svalbard, where Hg content and Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC ratios are consistently elevated
during the PETM compared to overlying and preceding strata (M. T. Jones et al.,
2019). Svalbard is unique as a PETM locality in that there were high
sedimentation rates before, during, and after the CIE, with neither breaks in
sedimentation nor significant changes in lithology (Charles et al., 2011;
Dypvik et al., 2011), so the potential for sedimentological disruption to
the Hg signal is minimised. The combined records from Fur and
Svalbard suggest that Hg emissions were substantially elevated during the
PETM, resulting in higher Hg accumulation rates in these rapidly deposited
sediments (Fig. 3). The increase in  Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values and Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC anomalies
towards the end of the CIE body at Fur (Interval 6), combined with the
reappearance of ash layers in the stratigraphy, may suggest an increase in
NAIP activity. However, it could potentially be an artefact of assuming
constant sedimentation rates through the PETM body, whereas both Li isotope
variations (Pogge von Strandmann et al., 2021) and clay mineral assemblages
(Stokke et al., 2021) suggest that surface runoff and erosion rates were
greater earlier in the PETM. This discrepancy may affect the individual
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> interval estimations but does not change the main finding that
average Hg accumulation rates during the PETM CIE were significantly
elevated (Fig. 5).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS5">
  <label>5.1.5</label><title>PETM recovery (Fur Formation), Interval 7</title>
      <?pagebreak page1638?><p id="d1e8119">The PETM recovery is bounded by the thick felsic Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the basaltic
Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>a (Fig. 3), based on dinoflagellate cyst assemblages
(Heilmann-Clausen, 1994) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values (M. T. Jones et al., 2019).
Using estimated ages of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 55.83 Ma for the end of the PETM
body (van der Meulen et al., 2020) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 55.48 Ma for the
radiometric age of Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Storey et al., 2007a) gives an estimated
duration of 160 kyr between Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>a (Fig. 3). However, the
relatively well-constrained stratigraphic sections (PETM body and Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19) are not necessarily well correlated with each other, leading to
potentially significant errors in estimating the duration of Interval 7.
Although there are 12 ash layers in this interval, most are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 cm (Bøggild, 1918) and are extremely heterogeneous in composition,
suggesting sources from the NW European shelf (Larsen et al., 2003). The
bulk rock mineralogy shows the zeolite component declining from 27 % to
0 % from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.28 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.35 m depth (Stokke et al., 2021), although there is
a concurrent increase in the clay fraction from 4 % to 17 % that is
dominated by illite–smectite (Fig. 6). These mineralogical shifts suggest
a fundamental change in the volcanogenic sediment fluxes into the eastern
North Sea basin across the PETM recovery. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os data for
Intervals 7–9 are considerably more radiogenic than Intervals 1–6,
suggesting a fundamental shift in Os supply into the North Sea that may not
solely reflect changes in weathering of continental and basaltic substrates
(see Sect. 5.2.1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e8264">A compilation of weathering and climate proxies through
the studied section. <bold>(a)</bold> The stratigraphic log is adapted from
Stokke et al. (2020a), showing laminated intervals (dashed lines) and ash
layers (solid lines). Key ash layers are labelled on the log, along with the
position of the PETM CIE and intervals proposed in this study. <bold>(b)</bold> Variations in the relative abundance of clay minerals for Intervals 1–8
(Stokke et al., 2021) and Interval 9 (this study). <bold>(c)</bold> Sea surface temperature data based on the TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> proxy (Schoon et al., 2015; Stokke
et al., 2020a) and benthic temperatures based on clumped isotopes (Vickers
et al., 2020). <bold>(d)</bold> Detrital <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li values from Intervals 1–7 (Pogge von Strandmann et al., 2021) and Intervals 7–9 (this study).
<bold>(e)</bold> Initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os values at 55.9 Ma
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) through the studied section.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/1623/2023/cp-19-1623-2023-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e8374">The Hg signal during the PETM recovery is likely affected by the change from
clay-rich to diatomite-rich sediments and the associated change in
sedimentation rates and more oxidising conditions. Mercury content shows a
general decrease from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 ppb (Fig. 3), but the parallel decrease in TOC is significantly greater, leading to
higher Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC ratios (Table 1). The upper part of Interval 7 has TOC
content <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 wt %, which is taken as the cut-off for propagated
errors in Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC ratios being too high. However, even at TOC content values above
0.2 wt % there is a (subtle) remaining trend that is not accounted for by
a linear Hg–TOC relation, leading to higher Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC at comparatively lower
TOC in many datasets (Grasby et al., 2019). Calculating  Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is complicated
by the lack of a good chronology for this interval, coupled with a gradual
change in sediment density into the diatomite-rich strata. A 160 kyr
duration between Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21a gives a sedimentation rate of 2.8 cm kyr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Taking the mean Hg content of 37.6 ppb (Table 1) and assuming a
density between that of the Stolleklint Clay and the Fur Formation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) gives a mass accumulation rate (Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 0.12 ng cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Even with the substantial errors ingrained in this
estimation it is clear that Hg deposition decreased significantly during the
PETM recovery in the eastern North Sea (Fig. 5). A decline in volcanogenic
sediment input is corroborated by the extreme radiogenic shift in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopic values from 0.3 to 0.83 (Table 2,
Fig. 3a), although the amplitude of this change may be indicative of local
changes in the basin configuration rather than just changes in volcanic
activity (see Sect. 5.2.1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS6">
  <label>5.1.6</label><title>Early Eocene (Fur Formation), Intervals 8–9</title>
      <p id="d1e8563">The post-PETM Fur Formation is separated into two intervals based on the
abundance and chemistry of ash layers. In Interval 8, the Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>a  to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are relatively sparse and chemically heterolithic, likely being sourced from
a mixture of shelf sources and failed or propagating parts of the central
rift system (Larsen et al., 2003). In contrast, Interval 9 is dominated by
vast volumes of chemically homogenous tholeiitic basaltic ashes numbered
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>140 (Larsen et al., 2003). Physical and chemical evidence of
glass shards suggests that the central rift system started to develop
surface waterbodies, leading to phreatomagmatic activity and a shift from
effusive to explosive activity (Stokke et al., 2020b). The clay fraction in
the Fur Formation is dominated by smectite, reaching 100 % in Interval 9
(Fig. 6), which suggests that the weathering and erosion of volcanic rocks
into the North Sea basin continued to be an important sediment source into
the early Eocene.</p>
      <p id="d1e8600">Mercury content in the Fur Formation displays a gradual decrease from a mean
value of 47 ppb in the second part of Interval 8 (Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1) to 21 ppb in the middle part of Interval 9 (Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>118; Table 1) before increasing slightly at the top of the section in conjunction with
higher TOC content (Fig. 3). Organic carbon content is predominantly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 wt % in the diatomite, leading to significant scatter in
Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC values. The apparent enrichment in Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC compared to the Stolleklint
data likely reflects the bias of inflating Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC ratios at lower TOC
content (Grasby et al., 2019). Mercury accumulation rates (Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) reach a
nadir of 0.09 ng cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the first part of Interval 8 (Table 1,
Fig. 5), although it may be partly due to the aforementioned uncertainties
in sedimentation rate between Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The better-constrained
sedimentation rates in the 200 kyr interval between Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 give
calculated  Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.34 ng cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the second part of
Interval 8 and 0.23 ng cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the first part of Interval 9 (Table 1). These accumulation rates are well below the calculated Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values
during the PETM (Fig. 5) due to reduced sedimentation rates and lower
density of the diatomite. The sedimentation rates for the upper part of
Interval 9 are not known, but if the calculated value of 9.0 cm kyr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> between
Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 is assumed to continue, then  Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are 0.15 ng cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> between Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>118 and 0.25 ng cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
between Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>118 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>140 (Table 1). These Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates indicate
that the highest Hg deposition rates occur in the second half of Interval 8
and not concomitant with the start of the voluminous explosive volcanism in
Interval 9 (Fig. 5).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Tracing seaway connectivity</title>
      <p id="d1e8932">The Paleocene–Eocene transition is marked by several regional and eustatic
changes in sea levels. A global sea-level rise on the order of a few metres
during the PETM is attributed to the thermal expansion of seawater (Sluijs
et al., 2008). While this effect would be important for shallow slope/margin
environments, it is insufficient to affect seaway connectivity. In contrast,
the transient thermal uplift in the centre of the NAIP closed the Atlantic
connection via the Faroe–Shetland Basin until <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 54 Ma (Hartley
et al., 2011; Shaw Champion et al., 2008; White and Lovell, 1997). Evidence
from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O record of shark-tooth apatite indicates a North
Sea surface-water freshening in the early Eocene (Zacke et al., 2009),
suggesting that the Atlantic connection via the English Channel was also
temporarily restricted. This North Sea freshening is corroborated by an
influx of<?pagebreak page1640?> low-salinity tolerant dinocyst taxa into the North Sea prior to
the PETM CIE (Kender et al., 2012). There is also evidence of a transient
closure of the shallow marine connection to the Peri-Tethys (Radionova et
al., 2003) and a restriction of the Norwegian–Greenland Seaway (Hovikoski et
al., 2021) around the late Paleocene to early Eocene. Although the exact
timings of these events are not well constrained, these observations
indicate the potential for restriction of the pre-breakup Nordic and North Sea basins. The multiple datasets from the Danish Paleogene
strata in this study and prior work can be compared with other global
high-resolution records to explore changes to the oceanic connections
between the North Sea and the Atlantic, Tethys, and Arctic oceans.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>5.2.1</label><title>Osmium isotopes</title>
      <p id="d1e8960">There are now several <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os datasets from numerous global
localities that can be used to assess the extent of ocean connectivity
during the latest Paleocene and early Eocene (Fig. 7). The methodology of
Os retrieval has evolved through time. Older PETM studies used inverse aqua
regia for sample digestion (e.g. Dickson et al., 2015; Ravizza et al., 2001;
Schmitz et al., 2004; Wieczorek et al., 2013), while more recent analyses
used chromic acid to preferentially liberate hydrogenous Os (Liu et al.,
2019; this study). The inverse aqua regia digestion method is more
aggressive, potentially leading to contamination from detrital Os in
silicate minerals (e.g. Kendall et al., 2004). However, the existing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os data across the PETM are largely homogeneous across
the North Atlantic, Indian, and Tethys oceans (Dickson et al., 2015; Liu et
al., 2019; Ravizza et al., 2001; Schmitz et al., 2004). This global
homogeneity suggests that any detrital contamination is minimal and that
the open marine Os residence time exceeded the ocean mixing time.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e9016">A global compilation of initial Os isotopes at 55.9 Ma
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from sites across the Paleocene–Eocene
boundary. Fur (F; this study); Svalbard (S; Wieczorek et al., 2013);
Lomonosov Ridge (L), Kheu River in Russia (K), Dzhengutay in Russia (D),
and Guru Fatima in Tajikistan (T) (Dickson et al., 2015); Blake Nose (B) and
Millville in New Jersey (J) (Liu et al., 2019); Goban Spur site 549 (G) and
Indian Ocean Site 213 (I) (Ravizza et al., 2001); Zumaia in Spain (Z) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated to 55 Ma
in this study.)
(Schmitz et al., 2004). The data are shown as boxplots, where blue denotes late Paleocene samples, orange denotes confirmed
pre-PETM data (last few thousand years of the Paleocene), red denotes the PETM CIE, and
green denotes post-PETM early Eocene samples. Plate tectonic reconstruction map
adapted from Pogge von Strandmann et al. (2021).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/1623/2023/cp-19-1623-2023-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e9107">Overall, the global marine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os pool reflects a highly
unradiogenic signature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
before, during, and after the PETM (Fig. 7). There is some variability
between localities, such as a pronounced drop in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in pre-PETM strata from the North Atlantic
that suggests elevated unradiogenic fluxes prior to the onset of the CIE
(Liu et al., 2019; Schmitz et al., 2004). This signal appears to be absent
from other sites, but that may be due to data gaps and/or condensed sections
(Fig. 7). The late Paleocene, pre-PETM, and PETM body intervals in Denmark
have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values between 0.258 and 0.403 (Table 2,
Fig. 5), with the more unradiogenic values found in pre-PETM strata. These
values are in good agreement with global ocean datasets, which suggests that
there was an open seaway connection between the North Sea and the North
Atlantic Ocean before and during the PETM CIE (Fig. 1). In contrast to the
global ocean signal, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> records from Svalbard
(Wieczorek et al., 2013) and Lomonosov Ridge (Dickson et al., 2015) show
much more radiogenic signatures (Fig. 7). This heterogeneity suggests that
both the Central Spitsbergen Basin and the Arctic Ocean were largely cut off
from the global oceans, with little evidence of an open Barents Shelf. The
pre-PETM Svalbard strata do show an unradiogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os
shift (Wieczorek et al., 2013), as also observed in this study (Table 2) and
in North Atlantic datasets (Liu et al., 2019; Schmitz et al., 2004). This
consistent regional pattern suggests that a source of unradiogenic Os such
as NAIP volcanism was also able to affect the northern part of the
Norwegian–Greenland Seaway (Fig. 1). The early Eocene shift to
unradiogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os values at Lomonosov Ridge (Fig. 5;
Dickson et al., 2015) may then indicate a post-PETM increase in seawater
transfer between the Arctic and the Peri-Tethys through western Siberia
(Radionova et al., 2003).</p>
      <p id="d1e9351">The extreme change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values from 0.3 to 0.83
at the beginning of the PETM recovery in the Danish strata (Table 2, Fig. 5) is a large deviation from the global trend that continues for the entire
Fur Formation. This radiogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> shift occurs in
samples 109 cm apart, or 88 cm excluding the thicknesses of Ashes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 3). Using the calculated sedimentation rates for Intervals 6 and 7
(Sect. 5.1.4 and 5.1.5) gives an estimated duration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.9 kyr between the two
samples, which suggests that a rapid and sustained isolation of the North
Sea basin coincided with the start of the PETM recovery. This result
corroborates previous findings of a freshening of the North Sea in the early
Eocene (Zacke et al., 2009) while markedly improving the resolution of the
timing of isolation to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 55.82 Ma. This timing is in excellent
agreement with the estimated age of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55.80</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma for a buried
landscape surface in the Faroe–Shetland Basin (Hartley et al., 2011; Shaw
Champion et al., 2008), which represented a major regional regression
associated with NAIP uplift (Conway-Jones and White, 2022). The presence of
Ash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the interval of rapid <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os change is also
noteworthy, as the source volcano is postulated to be the island of Lundy in
south-western England (Larsen et al., 2003). It is therefore plausible that the
uplift associated with the NAIP reactivated the Lundy volcanic system in
conjunction with the closing of the English Channel (Fig. 1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>5.2.2</label><title>Lipid biomarkers</title>
      <p id="d1e9523">Unlike all other analysed sites, the Lomonosov Arctic Coring Expedition (ACEX) core and part of the Fur
datasets do not show a marked response to the PETM warming in fcren' (Fig. 8). These observations suggest that thaumarchaeotal membrane adaptation
predominantly occurred through GDGTs 1–3 for these datasets and not also
through increased fcren', as seen at other open marine localities. It seems
that only part of this divergent response can be ascribed to lower
temperatures both at Fur and in the Arctic Ocean at the time, since
TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived SSTs as well as vegetation reconstructions favour
warm–temperate to subtropical conditions at both localities (Sluijs et al.,
2020; Suan et<?pagebreak page1641?> al., 2017; Weijers et al., 2007; West et al., 2015; Willard et
al., 2019; Willumsen, 2004), which is similar to sites in the high-latitude
Southern Hemisphere (Bijl et al., 2021; Contreras et al., 2014; Huurdeman et
al., 2020; Sluijs et al., 2011).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e9537">A comparison of TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and fcren' data across the
PETM from existing global datasets: Fur (F; Stokke et al., 2020a);
Lomonosov Ridge (L; Sluijs et al., 2020); Turgay Strait in Siberia (Y; Frieling et al., 2014); the Gulf of Mexico (M; Smith et al., 2020); Bass
River and Wilson Lake, New Jersey, shelf (J; Sluijs et al., 2007); ODP 959D
on the Côte d'Ivoire margin (C; Frieling et al., 2019); Nigerian margin
BH10 (N; Frieling et al., 2017); and ODP 1172D on the East Tasman Plateau
(E; Sluijs et al., 2011). The data are shown as boxplots, where blue denotes late Paleocene samples, orange denotes
confirmed pre-PETM data (last few thousand years of the Paleocene), red denotes the PETM CIE, and green denotes post-PETM early Eocene samples. Plate tectonic
reconstruction map adapted from Pogge von Strandmann et al. (2021).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/19/1623/2023/cp-19-1623-2023-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e9555">In addition, the relatively cold West Siberian Sea at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (Frieling et al., 2014) is considered to have had an
open connection to the Arctic but also to the Peri-Tethys to the south, and
its GDGT response follows the pattern of other globally distributed sites
throughout the Paleocene and Eocene. Deoxygenation and freshwater input can
be excluded as dominant controlling factors since these are not unique to
either the Danish or the Lomonosov strata (e.g. Carmichael et al., 2017;
Frieling et al., 2014; Sluijs et al., 2014). The divergent response between
TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and fcren' to temperature changes in the latest Paleocene and
early Eocene at the Fur and ACEX sites may therefore have been facilitated
by temporary basinal restriction. It is intriguing that the TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–fcren' data from the Lomonosov locality show a more normal marine response
during the Eocene Thermal Maximum 2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 54 Ma) interval (Sluijs
et al., 2020; Sluijs et al., 2009). While we cannot confirm that a similar signal
occurred in the North Sea area at the same time, as this interval post-dates
the Fur Formation, it highlights that exploring the behaviour of lipid-based
proxies may aid in identifying and constraining periods of basin restriction
in the region.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page1643?><sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>Weathering and hydrology</title>
      <p id="d1e9608">The Li isotope record for the Stolleklint Clay and Fur Formation shows large
variations both during and after the PETM (Fig. 3). A major excursion in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ in under 10 kyr, which
is coeval with the PETM onset and matches other global siliciclastic and
carbonate Li isotope records, is interpreted to be a direct weathering
response to an enhanced hydrological cycle during global warming (Pogge von
Strandmann et al., 2021). However, the post-PETM record continues to show
considerable variability, with three negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li excursions
broadly coinciding with the start of Intervals 7, 8, and 9, each followed by
positive excursions (Fig. 3). Notably, the excursion at the start of
Interval 9 is of a comparable magnitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) to the
excursion during the PETM onset, albeit a gradual change over 15 m
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 160 kyr) rather than a sharp response over a 12 cm interval
(Fig. 6).</p>
      <p id="d1e9660">Numerous factors could have influenced the detrital <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li signal
to generate the observed fluctuations in the Fur Formation. Increased
surface temperatures elevate both chemical weathering and erosion and may
increase erosion more than chemical weathering, leading to a lower-weathering-intensity regime, as proposed to explain the negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li excursion during the PETM onset (Pogge von Strandmann et al.,
2021). However, the lack of correlation between Li isotopes and
paleotemperatures in post-PETM sediments suggests that climate was not the
main driving factor of later <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li excursions (Fig. 6).
Alternatively, uplift associated with the emplacement of the NAIP could
affect detrital <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li values (Dellinger et al., 2017, 2015), since the increase in topography would steepen slopes and
increase erosion rates, which could also lower the weathering intensity.
This effect could account for the negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li excursion
observed at the start of the PETM recovery (Interval 7), which was coeval
with the NAIP uplift that isolated the North Sea from the North Atlantic
Ocean. However, this NAIP uplift phase was the last major regression that is
recognised in proximal settings (Hartley et al., 2011; Shaw Champion et al.,
2008; White and Lovell, 1997), so continued uplift events were unlikely to
be responsible for the negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li excursions during
Intervals 8 and 9 (Fig. 6).</p>
      <p id="d1e9730">Variations in clay mineralogy and/or clay content could also cause <inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li excursions in the bulk sediments, but there is little correlation
between Li isotopes and clay mineralogy through the Fur Formation (Fig. 6). Peaks in kaolinite content, possibly indicating enhanced runoff
transporting this denser clay further into the catchment (Nielsen et al.,
2015; Stokke et al., 2021), do not correlate with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li values
(Fig. 6). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li excursions also do not appear to be linked
to changes in the bulk lithology. The heavily laminated sections in
Intervals 4 (Stolleklint Clay) and 8 (Fur Formation diatomite) show opposing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li trends, while the upper sections of Interval 9
(unlaminated diatomite), where the clay component comprises 100 %
smectite, continue to show some isotopic variability (Fig. 6). In summary,
variations in clay mineralogy or lithology do not appear to be driving the
observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li fluctuations.</p>
      <p id="d1e9788">One proxy that does broadly correlate with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li variations in
the post-PETM sediments is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os record (Fig. 6).
Osmium isotopes reflect a basin-wide signal, while the detrital <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li record in Danish strata is likely representative of siliciclastic
input from the Fennoscandian shield on the north-eastern North Sea margin (Anell
et al., 2012). Assuming that the North Sea remained largely isolated from
the North Atlantic Ocean during the deposition of the Fur Formation, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> record suggests an increase in basalt-derived
fluxes towards the start of Interval 9 (Fig. 6). The correlation with the
decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li values suggests that volcanic ash was likely
being deposited on the Fennoscandian platform in increasing quantities
towards the end of Interval 8 and that these ash deposits were rapidly
weathered and eroded, forming isotopically light clays that were transported
into the basin. During the 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajökull in Iceland,
clay formation occurred within just a few months of ash deposition in local
catchments (Olsson et al., 2014; Paque et al., 2016; Pogge von Strandmann et
al., 2019), and this process was likely to have been faster in the warmer
Eocene climate. The gradual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li excursion of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ from Interval 8 to Interval 9 also coincides with an
increase in Hg content (Fig. 3a) and estimated Hg accumulation rates
(Fig. 5), which is also consistent with a volcanic origin. In combination,
these proxies suggest that the post-PETM variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Li
values were largely governed by the rapid weathering and erosion of
terrestrial ash deposits from the NAIP, which reached a post-PETM peak
around the start of Interval 9.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e9931">The combined proxies for volcanic ash deposition, clay mineralogy, Hg
anomalies, Li isotopes, and initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values indicate that NAIP activity is
prevalent throughout the entire Paleogene strata exposed at Fur in
north-western Denmark. However, the proxies wax and wane, indicating significant
changes in the NAIP activity across this interval (ca. 56–55 Ma). The late Paleocene Holmehus/Østerrende clay (Interval 1) contains a
volcanogenically rich mineralogy and an unradiogenic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> signature that suggest substantial erosion and
weathering of basaltic terrains, while eruptive proxies suggest low-level
but increasing NAIP activity towards the latest Paleocene. The strata above
the possible unconformity (Interval 2) show more unradiogenic Os isotope
values (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.275), as observed in other
pre-PETM records. The appearance of thick ash layers and Hg anomalies
indicates a significant increase in NAIP activity just before the PETM.
However, it is unclear what proportion of this activity was effusive,
explosive, or volatile release from contact metamorphism around intrusions.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1644?><p id="d1e10084"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The PETM onset at Fur (Interval 3) is bounded by ash layers, but within the
condensed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C excursion there is little evidence for elevated
NAIP activity. The PETM body (Intervals 4–6) has the highest sediment
accumulation rates in the studied strata, and several proxies (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os) remain stable over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 m of
stratigraphy. Mercury content covaries with organic carbon, resulting in
near-constant Hg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOC ratios. However, factoring in the elevated
sedimentation rates, these data imply voluminous and continuous Hg
accumulation rates (Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) that were more than an order of magnitude greater
than during both the PETM onset and recovery in the eastern North Sea.
Combined with the sustained unradiogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os<inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values and a large increase in zeolite content, these findings suggest that
the peak in NAIP activity occurred during the body of the PETM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C excursion (ca. 55.9–55.8 Ma). The relative scarcity of ash layers
in the PETM strata implies that this elevated activity was likely dominated
by effusive eruptions and/or thermogenic degassing.</p>
      <p id="d1e10210">The post-PETM Fur Formation (Intervals 7–9) contains the vast majority of
the regionally recognised ash horizons, but other proxy evidence (e.g.
Hg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> rates) suggests an overall diminished NAIP activity. These findings
suggest a change in eruptive style to more explosive activity, and therefore
ash production, that was likely aided by increased magma–water interactions
within the rift system. Changes in detrital Li isotopes suggest that
increased ash production enhanced silicate weathering and erosion fluxes,
potentially increasing carbon sequestration during the PETM recovery
(Longman et al., 2021) and early Eocene. These combined proxies indicate
that much of the main acme of the NAIP activity, constrained to
approximately 56–54 Ma based on the existing suite of sparse radiometric
ages (Wilkinson et al., 2017), was likely to have been concentrated in a
much shorter interval between 56.0 and 55.8 Ma coincident with the PETM CIE.</p>
      <p id="d1e10222">There is evidence for transiently reduced-salinity conditions in the North
Sea and the Arctic Ocean in the late Paleocene and early Eocene, but the
timing of these potential basin restrictions is not well constrained. A
combination of Os isotopes and biomarkers was compared with global datasets
to provide high-resolution proxies for the restriction of the North Sea
basin. The Os isotope record at Fur deviates rapidly from the global
ocean signal in under 12 kyr at the end of the PETM body, coinciding with
the start of the CIE recovery, which suggests that there was a rapid
isolation of the North Sea contemporaneous with the end of hyperthermal
conditions. The TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and fcren' records may indicate short-lived
basinal restriction and/or reduced salinity in pre-PETM strata, but the
deviation from open-ocean datasets is most pronounced during the PETM
recovery phase and early Eocene. Combined, these data suggest that the NAIP
uplift closed the English Channel at an estimated 55.82 Ma, with the North
Sea subsequently remaining restricted from the Atlantic Ocean for at least
several hundred thousand years. The close temporal correlation between the large radiogenic
shift in Os isotopes and the end of the PETM warrants further investigation,
as it suggests a possible relationship between the NAIP uplift, seaway
connectivity, and the end of hyperthermal conditions.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e10238">All data generated in this study are available in the Supplement.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sampleavailability"><title>Sample availability</title>

      <p id="d1e10244">Samples may be available upon request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e10247">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1623-2023-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1623-2023-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e10256">MTJ, JF, HHS, and SP devised the study. MTJ, EWS, HHS, SP, TA, NT, MLV, CT,
VZ, and BPS contributed to fieldwork. MTJ, ADR, EWS, JF, PPvS, DJW, TA, NT,
and TAM conducted laboratory analyses. MTJ prepared the manuscript with
contributions from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e10262">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e10268">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e10274">Gauti Eliassen, Lars Eivind Augland, Sara Callegaro, Olivia Jones, Christine Grabatin, and Claus Heilman-Clausen are warmly thanked for their assistance.
Nina Papadomanolaki, Marcus Gutjahr, and Thomas Gernon are thanked for their
constructive reviews and comments, and Yannick Donnadieu is thanked for handling
this paper. This work was supported by the Research Council of Norway
through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme, project numbers 223272 and
332523. Morgan T. Jones and Ella W. Stokke were funded by the Research Council of Norway
Ungeforskertalenter project “Ashlantic”, project number 263000. Tamsin A. Mather and Joost Frieling
acknowledge funding from the European Research Council Consolidator Grant
(ERC-2018-COG-818717-V-ECHO). Philip A. E. Pogge von Strandmann was supported by ERC grant 682760. David J. Wilson
was supported by a NERC independent research fellowship (NE/T011440/1). Madeleine L. Vickers
was funded by the European Commission, Horizon 2020 project ICECAP, grant
no. 101024218.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e10280">This research has been supported by the Norges Forskningsråd (grant nos. 263000 and 223272).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <?pagebreak page1645?><p id="d1e10286">This paper was edited by Yannick Donnadieu and reviewed by Nina Papadomanolaki and Marcus Gutjahr.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Abdelmalak, M. M., Planke, S., Faleide, J. I., Jerram, D. A., Zastrozhnov, D.,
Eide, S., and Myklebust, R.: The development of volcanic sequences at rifted
margins: New insights from the structure and morphology of the Vøring
Escarpment, mid-Norwegian Margin, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol.
Ea., 121, 5212–5236, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Anell, I., Thybo, H., and Rasmussen, E.: A synthesis of Cenozoic
sedimentation in the North Sea, Basin Res., 24, 154–179, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ayris, P.  and Delmelle, P.: Volcanic and atmospheric controls on ash iron solubility: A review, Phys. Chem. Earth, 45–46, 103–112,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Behar, F., Beaumont, V., and Penteado, H. L. D.: Rock-Eval 6 technology:
Performances and developments, Oil and Gas Science and Technology, 56,
111–134, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Berndt, C., Planke, S., Alvarez Zarikian, C. A., Frieling, J., Jones, M. T., Millett, J. M., Brinkhuis, H., Bünz, S., Svensen, H. H., Longman, J., Scherer, R. P., Karstens, J., Manton, B., Nelissen, M., Reed, B., Faleide, J. I., Huismans, R. S., Agarwal, A., Andrews, G. D. M., Betlem, P., Bhattacharya, J., Chatterjee, S., Christopoulou, M., Clementi, V. J., Ferré, E. C., Filina, I. Y., Guo, P., Harper, D. T., Lambart, S., Mohn, G., Nakaoka R., Tegner, C., Varela, N., Wang, M., Xu, W., and Yager, S. L.: Shallow-water hydrothermal venting linked to the Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, Nat. Geosci., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01246-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-023-01246-8</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bijl, P. K., Frieling, J., Cramwinckel, M. J., Boschman, C., Sluijs, A., and Peterse, F.: Maastrichtian–Rupelian paleoclimates in the southwest Pacific – a critical re-evaluation of biomarker paleothermometry and dinoflagellate cyst paleoecology at Ocean Drilling Program Site 1172, Clim. Past, 17, 2393–2425, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-2393-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-17-2393-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bindler, R.: Estimating the natural background atmospheric deposition rate
of mercury utilizing ombotrophic bogs in southern Sweden, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 37, 40–46, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Blaga, C. I., Reichart, G. J., Heiri, O., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.:
Tetraether membrane lipid distributions in water-column particulate matter
and sediments: A study of 47 European lakes along a north-south transect,
J. Paleolimnol., 41, 523–540, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bøggild, O. B.: Den vulkanske Aske i Moleret samt en Oversigt over Danmarks ældre Tertiærbjærgarter, B. Geol. Soc. Denmark, 33, 1–159, 1918.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bowen, G. and Zachos, J.: Rapid carbon sequestration at the termination of the Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, Nat. Geosci., 3, 866–869, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1014</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bowen, G. J.: Up in smoke: A role for organic carbon feedbacks in Paleogene hyperthermals, Global   Planet. Change, 109, 18–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.07.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.07.001</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Boyden, J. A., Müller, D. R., Gurnis, M., Torsvik, T. H., Clark, J. A.,
Turner, M., Ivey-Law, H., Watson, R. J., and Cannon, J. S.: Next-generation
plate-tectonic reconstructions using GPlates, in:  Geoinformatics: Cyberinfrastructure for the Solid Earth Sciences, edited by: Keller, G. R. and Baru, C.,
Cambridge University Press,  95–114, ISBN 9780521897150, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Broeker, W. S.  and Peng, T.-H.: Tracers in the sea. Eldigio Press, Lamont
(Doherty Geological Observatory), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200005221" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0033822200005221</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bujak, J. P.  and Mudge, D. C.: A high-resolution North Sea Eocene dinocyst
zonation, J. Geol. Soc., 151, 449–462, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.151.3.0449" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/gsjgs.151.3.0449</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Carmichael, M. J., Inglis, G. N., Badger, M. P., Naafs, B. D. A., Behrooz, L.,
Remmelzwaal, S., and Dickson, A. J.: Hydrological and associated
biogeochemical consequences of rapid global warming during the
Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, Global   Planet. Change, 157, 114–138,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Charles, A., Condon, D., Harding, I., Pälike, H., Marshall, J., Cui, Y.,
Kump, L., and Croudace, I.: Constraints on the numerical age of the
Palaeocene-Eocene boundary, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 12, Q0AA17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GC003426" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GC003426</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Contreras, L., Pross, J., Bijl, P. K., O'Hara, R. B., Raine, J. I., Sluijs, A., and Brinkhuis, H.: Southern high-latitude terrestrial climate change during the Palaeocene–Eocene derived from a marine pollen record (ODP Site 1172, East Tasman Plateau), Clim. Past, 10, 1401–1420, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1401-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-10-1401-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Conway-Jones, B. W.  and White, N.: Paleogene buried landscapes and climatic
aberrations triggered by mantle plume activity, Earth   Planet. Sc.
Lett., 593, 117644, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117644" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117644</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cramer, B. S., Toggweiler, J. R., Wright, J. D., Katz, M. E., and Miller, K. G.:
Ocean overturning since the Late Cretaceous: Inferences from a new benthic
foraminiferal isotope compilation, Paleoceanography 24, PA4216, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008PA001683" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008PA001683</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cramwinckel, M. J., Huber, M., Kocken, I. J., Agnini, C., Bijl, P. K., Bohaty,
S. M., Frieling, J., Goldner, A., Hilgen, F. J., Kip, E. L., Peterse, F., van
der Ploeg, R., Röhl, U., Schouten, S., and Sluijs, A.: Synchronous
tropical and polar temperature evolution in the Eocene, Nature, 559, 382–386,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Creaser, R. A., Papanastassiou, D. A., and Wasserburg, G. J.: Negative thermal
ion mass spectrometry of osmium, rhenium and iridium, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 55, 397–401, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Deconinck, J. F.  and Chamley, H.: Diversity of smectite origins in Late
Cretaceous sediments: example of chalks from northern France, Clay Miner.,
30, 365–379, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dellinger, M., Gaillardet, J., Bouchez, J., Calmels, D., Louvat, P.,
Dosseto, A., Gorge, C., Alanoca, L., and Maurice, L.: Riverine Li isotope
fractionation in the Amazon River basin controlled by the weathering
regimes, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 164, 71–93, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dellinger, M., Bouchez, J., Gaillardet, J., Faure, L., and Moureau, J.:
Tracing weathering regimes using the lithium isotope composition of detrital
sediments, Geology, 45, 411–414, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dessert, C., Dupré, B., Gaillardet, J., François, L., and
Allègre, C. J.: Basalt weathering laws and the impact of basalt
weathering on the global carbon cycle, Chem. Geol., 202, 257–273, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dickens, G. R., O'Neil, J. R., Rea, D. K., and Owen, R. M.: Dissociation of
oceanic methane hydrate as a cause of the carbon-isotope excursion at the
end of the Paleocene, Paleoceanography, 10, 965–971, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dickson, A. J., Cohen, A. S., Coe, A. L., Davies, M., Shcherbinina, E. A., and
Gavrilov, Y. O.: Evidence for weathering and volcanism during the PETM from
Arctic Ocean and Peri-Tethy<?pagebreak page1646?>s osmium isotope records, Palaeogeogr.
Palaeocl., 438, 300–307, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dickson, A. J., Cohen, A. S., and Davies, M.: The Osmium Isotope Signature of
Phanerozoic Large Igneous Provinces, in:  Large Igneous Provinces: A Driver of Global Environmental and
Biotic Changes, edited by: Ernst, R. E., Dickson, A. J., and Bekker,
A., American Geophysical Union and John Wiley and Sons, Inc, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119507444.ch10" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9781119507444.ch10</ext-link>,
2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dunkley-Jones, T., Lunt, D. J., Schmidt, D. N., Ridgwell, A. J., Sluijs, A.,
Valdes, P. J., and Maslin, M. A.: Climate model and proxy data constraints on
ocean warming across the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, Earth Sci.
Rev., 125, 123–145, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dypvik, H., Riber, L., Burca, F., Rüther, D., Jargvoll, D., Nagy, J.,
and Jochmann, M.: The Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum in Svalbard – clay
mineral and geochemical signals, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 303, 156–169, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Egger, H.  and Brückl, E.: Gigantic volcanic eruptions and climatic
change in the early Eocene, Int. J. Earth Sci., 95,
1065–1070, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Eldholm, O.  and Grue, K.: North Atlantic volcanic margins: dimensions and
production rates, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 2955–2968, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Eldholm, O.  and Thomas, E.: Environmental impact of volcanic margin
formation, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 117, 319–329, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eldrett, J. S., Greenwood, D. R., Polling, M., Brinkhuis, H., and Sluijs, A.: A seasonality trigger for carbon injection at the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, Clim. Past, 10, 759–769, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-759-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-10-759-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ernst, R. E. and Youbi, N.: How Large Igneous Provinces affect global
climate, sometimes cause mass extinctions, and represent natural markers in
the geological record, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl.,
478, 30–52, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Frieling, J., Iakovleva, A. I., Reichart, G.-J., Aleksandrova, G. N.,
Gnibidenko, Z. N., Schouten, S., and Sluijs, A.: Paleocene-Eocene warming and
biotic response in the epicontinental West Siberian Sea, Geology, 42,
767–770, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Frieling, J., Svensen, H. H., Planke, S., Cramwinckel, M. J., Selnes, H., and
Sluijs, A.: Thermogenic methane release as a cause for the long duration of
the PETM, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113,
12059–12064, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frieling, J., Gebhardt, H., Huber, M., Adekeye, O. A., Akande, S. O.,
Reichart, G.-J., Middelburg, J. J., Schouten, S., and Sluijs, A.: Extreme
warmth and heat-stressed plankton in the tropics during the Paleocene-Eocene
Thermal Maximum, Science Advances, 3, e1600891, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600891" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.1600891</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Frieling, J., Peterse, F., Lunt, D. J., Bohaty, S. M., Sinninghe Damsté,
J. S., Reichart, G. J., and Sluijs, A.: Widespread Warming Before and Elevated
Barium Burial During the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum: Evidence for
Methane Hydrate Release?, Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology, 34, 546–566,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Frieling, J., Mather, T. A., März, C., Jenkyns, H., Hennekam, R.,
Reichart, G.-J., Slomp, C. P., and van Helmond, N.: Effects of redox
variability and early diagenesis on marine sedimentary Hg records,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 351, 78–95, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gernon, T. M., Barr, R., Fitton, J. G., Hincks, T. K., Keir, D., Longman, J.,
Meridith, A. S., Mitchell, R. N., and Palmer, M. R.: Transient mobilization of
subcrustal carbon coincident with Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, Nat.
Geosci., 15, 573–579, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Golonka, J.: Phanerozoic paleoenvironment and paleolithofacies
maps: Cenozoic, Geologia/Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im,
Stanisława Staszica w Krakowie, 35, 507–587, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gramlich, J. W., Murphy, T. J., Garner, E. L., and Shields, W. R.: Absolute
Isotopic Abundance Ratio and Atomic Weight of a Reference Sample of Rhenium,
J. Res. Natl. Bur.  Phys.  Ch., 77, 691–698, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Grasby, S .E., Them II, T. R., Chen, Z., Yin, R., and Ardakani, O. H.: Mercury
as a proxy for volcanic emissions in the geologic record, Earth Sci.
Rev., 196, 102880, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102880" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102880</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gurnis, M., Turner, M., Zahirovic, S., DiCaprio, L., Spasojevic, S.,
Müller, R., Boyden, J., Seton, M., Manea, V., and Bower, D.: Plate
Tectonic Reconstructions with Continuously Closing Plates, Comput.
Geosci., 38, 35–42, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gutjahr, M., Ridgwell, A., Sexton, P. F., Anagnostou, E., Pearson, P. N.,
Pälike, H., Norris, R. D., Thomas, E., and Foster, G. L.: Very large
release of mostly volcanic carbon during the Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal
Maximum, Nature, 548, 573–577, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Haaland, H. J., Furnes, H., and Martinsen, O. J.: Paleogene tuffaceous
intervals, Grane Field (Block 25/11), Norwegian North Sea: their
depositional, petrographicl, geochemical character and regional
implications, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 17, 101–118, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hansen, D. M.: The morphology of intrusion-related vent structures and their
implications for constraining the timing of intrusive events along the NE
Atlantic margin, J. Geol. Soc., 163, 789–800, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hartley, R. A., Roberts, G. G., White, N., and Richardson, C.: Transient
convective uplift of an ancient buried landscape, Nat. Geosci., 4,
562–565, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heilmann-Clausen, C.: Review of Paleocene dinoflagellates from the North Sea
region, GFF, 116, 51–53, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/11035899409546149" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/11035899409546149</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Heilmann-Clausen, C.: Palæogene aflejringer over Danskekalken,
in: Aarhus Geokompendier, edited by: Nielsen, O. B., No. 1, Danmarks
geologi fra Kridt til i dag, 69–114, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Heilmann-Clausen, C., Nielsen, O. B., and Gersner, F.: Lithostratigraphy and
depositional environments in the Upper Paleocene and Eocene of Denmark,
Bulletin – Geological Society of Denmark, 33, 287–323, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Heilmann-Clausen, C., Schultz, B. P., Beyer, C., Friis, H., Schoon, P. L., and
Tegner, C.: New evidence for NE Atlantic pre-PETM volcanism, Rendiconti
Online – Società Geologica Italiana, 31, 99–100, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Heister, L. E., O'Day, P. A., Brooks, C. K., Neuhoff, P. S., and Bird, D. K.:
Pyroclastic deposits within the East Greenland Tertiary flood basalts,
J. Geol. Soc., 158, 269–284, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Horni, J., Hopper, J. R., Blischke, A., Geisler, W. H., Stewart, M.,
McDermott, K., Judge, M., Erlendsson, Ö., and Árting, U.: Regional
distribution of volcanism within the North Atlantic Igneous Province,
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 447, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP447.18" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/SP447.18</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hovikoski, J., Fyhn, M. B. W., Nøhr-Hansen, H., Hopper, J. R., Andrews, S.,
Barham, M., Nielsen, L. H., Bjerager, M., Bojesen-Koefoed, J., Lode, S.,
Sheldon, E., Uchman, A., Skorstengaard, P. R., and Alsen, P.:
Paleocene-Eocene volcanic segmentation of the Norwegian-Greenland seaway
reorganize<?pagebreak page1647?>d high-latitude ocean circulation, Commun. Earth
Environ., 2, 172, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00249-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-021-00249-w</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Huurdeman, E. P., Frieling, J., Reichgelt, T., Bijl, P. K., Bohaty, S. M.,
Holdgate, G. R., Gallagher, S. J., Peterse, F., Greenwood, D. R., and Pross,
J.: Rapid expansion of meso-megathermal rain forests into the southern high
latitudes at the onset of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, Geology, 49,
40–44, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Inglis, G. N., Farnsworth, A., Lunt, D. J., Foster, G. L., Hollis, C. J.,
Pagani, M., Jardine, P. E., Pearson, P. N., Markwick, P. J., Galsworthy,
A. M. J., Raynham, L., Taylor, K. W. R., and Pancost, R. D.: Descent towards the
Icehouse: Eocene sea surface cooling inferred from GDGT distributions,
Paleoceanography, 30, 1000–1020, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Inglis, G. N., Bragg, F., Burls, N. J., Cramwinckel, M. J., Evans, D., Foster, G. L., Huber, M., Lunt, D. J., Siler, N., Steinig, S., Tierney, J. E., Wilkinson, R., Anagnostou, E., de Boer, A. M., Dunkley Jones, T., Edgar, K. M., Hollis, C. J., Hutchinson, D. K., and Pancost, R. D.: Global mean surface temperature and climate sensitivity of the early Eocene Climatic Optimum (EECO), Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), and latest Paleocene, Clim. Past, 16, 1953–1968, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1953-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-16-1953-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jin, S., Kemp, D. B., Jolley, D. W., Vieira, M., Zachos, J. C., Huang, C., Li,
M., and Chen, W.: Large-scale, astronomically paced sediment input to the
North Sea Basin during the Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum, Earth
Planet. Sc. Lett., 579, 117340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117340" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117340</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>John, C. M., Bohaty, S. M., Zachos, J. C., Sluijs, A., Gibbs, S., Brinkhuis,
H., and Bralower, T. J.: North American continental margin records of the
Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum: Implications for global carbon and
hydrological cycling, Paleoceanography 23, PA2217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007PA001465" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007PA001465</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jones, M. T.: The environmental and climatic impacts of volcanic ash
deposition, in:
Volcanism and global environmental change, edited by:  Schmidt, A., Fristad, K., and Elkins-Tanton, L., Cambridge University Press,
260–274, ISBN 9781107058378, 1107058376, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jones, M. T., Jerram, D. A., Svensen, H. H., and Grove, C.: The effects of
large igneous provinces on the global carbon and sulphur cycles,
Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 441, 4–21, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jones, M. T., Percival, L. M. E., Stokke, E. W., Frieling, J., Mather, T. A., Riber, L., Schubert, B. A., Schultz, B., Tegner, C., Planke, S., and Svensen, H. H.: Mercury anomalies across the Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, Clim. Past, 15, 217–236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-217-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-15-217-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jones, S. M., Hoggett, M., Greene, S. E., and Dunkley Jones, T.: Large Igneous
Province thermogenic greenhouse gas flux could have initiated
Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum climate change, Nat. Commun., 10,
5547, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12957-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-019-12957-1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaya, M. Y., Dupont-Nivet, G., Frieling, J., Fioroni, C., Rohrmann, A., Altıner, S. Ö., Vardar, E., Tanyaş, H., Mamtimin, M., and Zhaojie, G.:
The Eurasian epicontinental sea was an important carbon sink during the
Palaeocene-Eocene thermal maximum, Commun. Earth Environ., 3,
124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00451-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-022-00451-4</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Keller, G., Mateo, P., Punekar, J., Khozyem, H., Gertsch, B., Spangenberg,
J., Bitchong, A., and Adatte, T.: Environmental changes during the
cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction and Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum:
Implications for the Anthropocene, Gondwana Res., 56, 69–89, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kendall, B. S., Creaser, R. A., Ross, G. M., and Selby, D.: Constraints on the
timing of Marinoan “Snowball Earth” glaciation by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Re–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os dating of a
Neoproterozoic, post-glacial black shale in Western Canada, Earth
Planet. Sc. Lett., 222, 729–740, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kender, S., Stephenson, M. H., Riding, J. B., Leng, M. J., Knox, R. B., Peck,
V. L., Kendrick, C. P., Ellis, M. A., Vane, C. H., and Jamieson, R.: Marine and
terrestrial environmental changes in NW Europe preceding carbon release at
the Paleocene–Eocene transition, Earth   Planet. Sc. Lett.,
353–354, 108–120, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kender, S., Bogus, K., Pedersen, G. K., Dybkjær, K., Mather, T. A.,
Mariani, E., Ridgwell, A., Riding, J. B., Wagner, T., Hesselbo, S. P., and
Leng, M. J.: Paleocene/Eocene carbon feedbacks triggered by volcanic
activity, Nat. Commun., 12, 5186, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25536-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-021-25536-0</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kennett, J. and Stott, L.: Abrupt deep-sea warming, palaeoceanographic
changes and benthic extinctions at the end of the Palaeocene, Nature, 353,
225–229, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kim, J. H., van der Meer, J., Schouten, S., Helmke, P., Willmott, V.,
Sangiorgi, F., Koç, N., Hopmans, E. C., and Damsté, J. S. S.: New
indices and calibrations derived from the distribution of crenarchaeal
isoprenoid tetraether lipids: Implications for past sea surface temperature
reconstructions, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 74, 4639–4654, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
King, C.: A Revised Correlation of Tertiary Rocks in the British Isles and
Adjacent Areas of NW Europe, The Geological Society, London, ISBN 978-1-86239-728-6, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kirtland Turner, S.: Constraints on the onset duration of the
Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, Philos. T. R.
Soc. A, 376, 20170082, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0082" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2017.0082</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kisakürek, B., James, R. H., and Harris, N. B. W.: Li and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>7Li in
Himalayan rivers: Proxies for silicate weathering?, Earth  Planet.
Sc. Lett., 237, 387–401, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Knox, R. B.  and Morton, A.: The record of early Tertiary N Atlantic
volcanism in sediments of the North Sea Basin, in:  Early Tertiary Volcanism and the opening of the NE Atlantic, edited by: Morton, A. and Parson, L.,
Geological Society Special Publication,  407–419, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Knox, R. W. O. B.: Nannoplankton zonation and the Palaeocene/Eocene boundary
beds of NW Europe: an indirect correlation by means of volcanic ash layers,
J. Geol. Soc., 141, 993–999, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Knox, R. W. O. B.: Stratigraphic significance of volcanic ash in Paleocene and
Eocene sediments at Sites 549 and 550,  edited by: Graciansky, P. C. D., Poag, C. W.,
al., Initial Reports DSDP. U.S. Government Printing Office,
Washington,  845–850, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.80.134.1985" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2973/dsdp.proc.80.134.1985</ext-link>,
1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kuiper, K., Deino, A., Hilgen, F., Krijgsman, W., Renne, P., and Wijbrans,
J.: Synchronizing rock clocks of Earth history, Science, 320, 500–504, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Larsen, L., Fitton, J., and Pedersen, A.: Paleogene volcanic ash layers in
the Danish Basin: compositions and source areas in the North Atlantic
Igneous Province, Lithos, 71, 47–80, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1648?><ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Larsen, R. B.  and Tegner, C.: Pressure conditions for the solidification of
the Skaergaard intrusion: Eruption of East Greenland flood basalts in less
than 300,000 years, Lithos, 92, 181–197, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Levasseur, S., Birck, J. L., and Allègre, C. J.: The osmium riverine flux
and the oceanic mass balance of osmium, Earth   Planet. Sc. Lett.,
174, 7–23, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, M., Bralower, T. J., Kump, L. R., Self-Trail, J. M., Zachos, J. C., Rush,
W. D., and Robinson, M. M.: Astrochronology of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal
Maximum on the Atlantic Coastal Plain, Nat. Commun., 13, 5618, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33390-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-022-33390-x</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Li, Y., Clift, P. D., Murray, R. W., Exnicios, E., Ireland, T., and
Böning, P.: Asian summer monsoon influence on chemical weathering and
sediment provenance determined by clay mineral analysis from the Indus
Submarine Canyon, Quaternary Res., 93, 23–39, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Littler, K., Röhl, U., Westerhold, T., and Zachos, J. C.: A
high-resolution benthic stable-isotope record for the South Atlantic:
Implications for orbital-scale changes in Late Paleocene–Early Eocene
climate and carbon cycling, Earth   Planet. Sc. Lett., 401, 18–30,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, J.  and Pearson, D.G.: Rapid, precise and accurate Os isotope ratio
measurements of nanogram to sub-nanogram amounts using multiple Faraday
collectors and amplifiers equipped with 1012 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> resistors by N-TIMS,
Chem. Geol., 363, 301–311, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Liu, Z., Horton, D. E., Tabor, C., Sageman, B. B., Percival, L. M. E., Gill,
B. C., and Selby, D.: Assessing the Contributions of Comet Impact and
Volcanism Toward the Climate Perturbations of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal
Maximum, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 14798–14806, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Longman, J., Gernon, T. M., Palmer, M. R., Jones, M. T., Stokke, E. W., and
Svensen, H. H.: Marine diagenesis of tephra aided the Palaeocene-Eocene
Thermal Maximum termination, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 571,
117101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117101</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lourens, L. J., Sluijs, A., Kroon, D., Zachos, J. C., Thomas, E., Röhl,
U., Bowles, J., and Raffi, I.: Astronomical pacing of late Palaeocene to
early Eocene global warming events, Nature, 435, 1083–1087, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lowe, D.: Tephrochronology and its application: a review, Quaternary Geology,
6, 107–153, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Luguet, A., Nowell, G. M., and Pearson, D. G.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">184</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">186</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os
measurements by Negative Thermal Ionisation Mass Spectrometry (N-TIMS):
Effects of interfering element and mass fractionation corrections on data
accuracy and precision, Chem. Geol., 248, 342–362, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Maclennan, J. and Jones, S. M.: Regional uplift, gas hydrate dissociation
and the origins of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 245, 65–80, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Manton, B., Müller, P., Mazzini, A., Zastrozhnov, D., Jerram, D. A.,
Millett, J. M., Schmid, D. W., Berndt, C., Myklebust, R., and Planke, S.:
Characterizing ancient and modern hydrothermal venting systems, Mar.
Geol., 447, 106781, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2022.106781" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.margeo.2022.106781</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Martin, C. E., Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B., Brunskill, G., and Szymczak, R.:
Osmium isotope geochemistry of a tropical estuary, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 65, 3193–3200, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
McInerney, F. A.  and Wing, S. L.: The Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum: a
perturbation of carbon cycle, climate, and biosphere with implications for
the future, Annu. Rev. Earth   Pl. Sc., 39, 489–516, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Meisel, T., Walker, R. J., Irving, A. J., and Lorand, J.-P.: Osmium isotopic
compositions of mantle xenoliths: a global perspective, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 65, 1311–1323, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Misra, S. and Froelich, P. N.: Lithium isotope history of cenozoic seawater:
Changes in silicate weathering and reverse weathering, Science, 335, 818–823,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Moore, D. M.  and Reynolds, R. C.: X-ray diffraction and the identification
and analysis of clay minerals, Oxford University Press, Oxford, ISBN 9780195051704, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Murphy, B., Farley, K., and Zachos, J.: An extra-terrestrial 3He-based
timescale for the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum (PETM) from Walvis Ridge
IODP Site 1266, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 74, 5098–5108, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Nielsen, O. B.: Danmarks geologi fra Kridt til i dag, Aarhus Geokompendie, 1,
1–13, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Nielsen, O. B., Rasmussen, E. S., and Thyberg, B. I.: Distribution of Clay
Minerals In the Northern North Sea Basin During the Paleogene and Neogene: A
Result of Source-Area Geology and Sorting Processes, J. Sediment.
Res., 85, 562–581, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>O'Brien, C. L., Robinson, S. A., Pancost, R. D., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.,
Schouten, S., Lunt, D. J., Alsenz, H., Bornemann, A., Bottini, C., Brassell,
S. C., Farnsworth, A., Forster, A., Huber, B. T., Inglis, G. N., Jenkyns, H. C.,
Linnert, C., Littler, K., Markwick, P., McAnena, A., Mutterlose, J., Naafs,
B. D. A., Püttmann, W., Sluijs, A., van Helmond, N. A. G. M., Vellekoop, J., Wagner,
T., and Wrobel, N.E.: Cretaceous sea-surface temperature evolution:
Constraints from TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and planktonic foraminiferal oxygen isotopes, Earth
Sci. Rev., 172, 224–247, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Olsson, J., Stipp, S. L. S., Makovicky, E., and Gislason, S. R.: Metal
scavenging by calcium carbonate at the Eyjafjallajökull volcano: A
carbon capture and storage analogue, Chem. Geol., 384, 135–148, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Outridge, P. M., Sanei, H., Stern, G. A., Hamilton, P. B., and Goodarzi, F.:
Evidence for control of mercury accumulation rates in Canadian High Arctic
lake sediments by variations of aquatic primary productivity, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 41, 5259–5265, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pagani, M., Pedentchouk, N., Huber, M., Sluijs, A., Schouten, S., Brinkhuis,
H., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., Dickens, G. R., and Expedition 302
Scientists: Arctic hydrology during global warming at the Palaeocene/Eocene
Thermal Maximum, Nature 442, 671–675, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Papadomanolaki, N. M., Sluijs, A., and Slomp, C. P.: Eutrophication and
Deoxygenation Forcing of Marginal Marine Organic Carbon Burial During the
PETM, Paleoceanogr. Paleocl., 37, e2021PA004232, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021PA004232" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021PA004232</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Paquay, F. S.  and Ravizza, G.: Heterogeneous seawater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os during the
Late Pleistocene glaciations, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 349–350,
126–138, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Paque, M., Detienne, M., Maters, E. C., and Delmelle, P.: Smectites and
zeolites in ash from the 2010 summit eruption of Eyjafjallajökull
volcano, Iceland, B. Volcanol., 78, 61, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-016-1056-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00445-016-1056-x</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1649?><ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Passey, S. R. and Jolley, D. W.: A revised lithostratigraphic nomenclature
for the Palaeogene Faroe Islands Basalt Group, NE Atlantic Ocean,
T. RSE Eath, 99, 127–158, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pedersen, G. K., Pedersen, S. A. S., Steffensen, J., and Pedersen, C. S.: Clay
content of a clayey diatomite, the Early Eocene Fur Formation, Denmark,
B. Geol. Soc. Denmark, 51, 159–177, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pedersen, S. A. S.: Architecture of Glaciotectonic Complexes, Geosciences, 4,
269–296, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Percival, L. M. E., Witt, M. L. I., Mather, T. A., Hermoso, M., Jenkyns, H. C.,
Hesselbo, S. P., Al-Suwaidi, A. H., Storm, M. S., Xu, W., and Ruhl, M.:
Globally enhanced mercury deposition during the end-Pliensbachian extinction
and Toarcian OAE: A link to the Karoo-Ferrar Large Igneous Province, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 428, 267–280, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Percival, L. M. E., Jenkyns, H. C., Mather, T. A., Dickson, A. J., Batenburg,
S. J., Ruhl, M., Hesselbo, S. P., Barclay, R., Jarvis, I., Robinson, S. A., and
Woelders, L.: Does large igneous province volcanism always perturb the
mercury cycle? Comparing the records of Oceanic Anoxic Event 2 and the
end-Cretaceous to other Mesozoic events, Am. J. Sci., 318,
799–860, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Percival, L. M. E., Bergquist, B. A., Mather, T. A., and Sanei, H.: Sedimentary
Mercury Enrichments as a Tracer of Large Igneous Province Volcanism, in:
Large Igneous Provinces: A
Driver of Global Environmental and Biotic Changes, edited by: Ernst, R. E., Dickson, A. J., and Bekker, A., American Geophyiscal
Union, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119507444.ch11" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9781119507444.ch11</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B.  and Jahn, B.-M.: Rhenium-osmium isotope systematics
and platinum group element concentrations: Loess and the upper continental
crust, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 2, 1061, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000172" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GC000172</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B.  and Ravizza, G.: The marine osmium isotope record,
Terra Nova, 12, 205–219, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B. and Ravizza, G. E.:   Chapter 8 – Osmium Isotope
Stratigraphy,   Geologic Time Scale 2020, edited by: Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., Schmitz, M. D., and Ogg, G. M., Elsevier,  239–257, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824360-2.00008-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-12-824360-2.00008-5</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Planke, S., Rasmussen, T., Rey, S., and Myklebust, R.: Seismic
characteristics and distribution of volcanic intrusions and hydrothermal
vent complexes in the Vøring and Møre basins, in: Petroleum Geology: North-West Europe and Global
Perspectives – Proceedings of the 6th Petroleum Geology Conference, edited by: Doré, A. G. and
Vining, B. A.,
Geological Society, London,  833–844, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Planke, S., Berndt, C., Alvarez Zarikian, C. A., and the Expedition 396
Scientists: Mid-Norwegian Margin Magmatism and Paleoclimate Implications,
Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, Volume 396, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.396.2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.14379/iodp.proc.396.2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pogge von Strandmann, P. A. E., Burton, K. W., Opfergelt, S., Eiriksdottir,
E. S., Murphy, M. J., Einarsson, A., and Gislason, S. R.: The effect of
hydrothermal spring weathering processes and primary productivity on lithium
isotopes: Lake Myvatn, Iceland, Chem. Geol., 445, 4–13, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pogge von Strandmann, P. A. E., Desrochers, A., Murphy, M. J., Finlay, A. J.,
Selby, D., and Lenton, T. M.: Global climate stabilisation by chemical
weathering during the Hirnantian glaciation, Geochemical Perspective Letters,
3, 230–237, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pogge von Strandmann, P. A. E., Frings, P. J., and Murphy, M. J.: Lithium
isotope behaviour during weathering in the Ganges Alluvial Plain, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 198, 17–31, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pogge von Strandmann, P. A. E., Fraser, W. T., Hammond, S. J., Tarbuck, G.,
Wood, I. G., Oelkers, E. H., and Murphy, M. J.: Experimental determination of
Li isotope behaviour during basalt weathering, Chem. Geol., 517, 34–43,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pogge von Strandmann, P. A. E., Kasemann, S. A., and Wimpenny, J. B.: Lithium
and lithium isotopes in Earth's surface cycles, Elements, 16, 253–258, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pogge von Strandmann, P. A. E., Jones, M. T., West, A. J., Murphy, M. J., Stokke,
E. W., Tarbuck, G., Wilson, D. J., Pearce, C. R., and Schmidt, D. N.: Lithium
isotope evidence for enhanced weathering and erosion during the
Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, Science Advances, 7, eabh4224, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abh4224" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.abh4224</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Powers, L., Werne, J. P., Vanderwoude, A. J., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.,
Hopmans, E. C., and Schouten, S.: Applicability and calibration of the TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
paleothermometer in lakes, Org. Geochem., 41, 404–413, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Prøis, B. M.: Late Paleocene – earliest Eocene prograding system in the
SW Barents Sea, Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, p. 76, <uri>https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/45547</uri> (last access: 1 August 2023), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pujalte, V., Baceta, J. I., and Schmitz, B.: A massive input of coarse-grained siliciclastics in the Pyrenean Basin during the PETM: the missing ingredient in a coeval abrupt change in hydrological regime, Clim. Past, 11, 1653–1672, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-1653-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-11-1653-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pyle, D. M.  and Mather, T. A.: The importance of volcanic emissions for
global atmospheric mercury cycle, Atmos. Environ., 37, 5115–5124,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Racionero-Gómez, B., Sproson, A. D., Selby, D., Gannoun, A., Gröcke,
D. R., Greenwell, H. C., and Burton, K. W.: Osmium uptake, distribution, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Re <inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os compositions in Phaeophyceae macroalgae, Fucus
vesiculosus: Implications for determining the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os <inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Os composition of
seawater, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 199, 48–57, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Radionova, E. P., Beniamovski, V. N., Iakovleva, A. I., Muzylöv, N. G.,
Oreshkina, T. V., Shcherbinina, E. A., and Kozlova, G. E.: Early Paleogene
transgressions: Stratigraphical and sedimentological evidence from the
northern Peri-Tethys, in:  Causes and consequences of globally warm climates in the early
Paleogene, Geological Society of America Special Paper, edited by: Wing, S. L., Gingerich, P. D., Schmitz, B., and Thomas,
E., Boulder, Colordao,
239–261, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0-8137-2369-8.239" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/0-8137-2369-8.239</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rateau, R., Schofield, N., and Smith, M.: The potential role of igneous
intrusions on hydrocarbon migration, West of Shetland, Petrol. Geosci.,
19, 259–272, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib133"><label>133</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ravizza, G., Norris, R. D., Blusztajn, J., and Aubry, M.-P.: An osmium
isotope excursion associated with the late Paleocene thermal maximum:
Evidence of intensified chemical weathering, Paleoceanography 16, 155–163,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib134"><label>134</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reynolds III, R. C.  and Reynolds Jr., R. C.: NEWMOD II a computer program for
the calculation of one-dimensional diffraction patterns of mixed-layered
clays, 1526 Farlow Avenue, Crofton, MD, 21114, USA, <uri>https://newmod-for-clays.com</uri> (last access: 30 July 2023), 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1650?><ref id="bib1.bib135"><label>135</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Reynolds, P., Planke, S., Millett, J. M., Jerram, D. A., Trulsvik, M., and
Schofield, N.: Hydrothermal vent complexes offshore Northeast Greenland: A
potential role in driving the PETM, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 467,
72–78, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib136"><label>136</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Roberts, C. D., LeGrande, A. N., and Tripati, A. K.: Climate sensitivity to
Arctic seway restriction during the early Paleogene, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 286, 576–585, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib137"><label>137</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Röhl, U., Westerhold, T., Bralower, T., and Zachos, J.: On the duration
of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), Geochem. Geophy.
Geosy., 8, Q12002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001784" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GC001784</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib138"><label>138</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rooney, A. D., Selby, D., Lloyd, J. M., Roberts, D. H., Lückge, A.,
Sageman, B. B., and Prouty, N. G.: Tracking millennial-scale Holocene glacial
advance and retreat using osmium isotopes: Insights from the Greenland ice
sheet, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 138, 49–61, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib139"><label>139</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sanei, H., Grasby, S., and Beauchamp, B.: Latest Permian mercury anomalies,
Geology, 40, 63–66, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib140"><label>140</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sato, H., Onoue, T., Nozaki, T., and Suzuki, K.: Osmium isotope evidence for
a large Late Triassic impact event, Nat. Commun., 4, 2455, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3455" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms3455</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib141"><label>141</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schmitz, B., Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B., Heilmann-Clausen, C., Aberg, G., Asaro,
F., and Lee, C.-T. A.: Basaltic explosive volcanism, but no comet impact, at
the Paleocene–Eocene boundary: high-resolution chemical and isotopic
records from Egypt, Spain and Denmark, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
225, 1–17, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib142"><label>142</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schoene, B., Eddy, M. P., Samperton, K. M., Keller, C. B., Keller, G., Adatte,
T., and Khadri, S. F. R.: U-Pb constraints on pulsed eruption of the Deccan
Traps across the end-Cretaceous mass extinction, Science, 363, 862–866, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib143"><label>143</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schoon, P. L., Heilmann-Clausen, C., Schultz, B. P., Sluijs, A., Damasté,
J. S. S., and Schouten, S.: Recognition of Early Eocene global carbon isotope
excursions using lipids of marine Thaumarchaeota, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 373, 160–168, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib144"><label>144</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schoon, P. L., Heilmann-Clausen, C., Schultz, B. P., Damasté, J. S. S., and
Schouten, S.: Warming and environmental changes in the eastern North Sea
Basin during the Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum as revealed by biomarker
lipids, Org. Geochem., 78, 79–88, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib145"><label>145</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schouten, S., Hopmans, E. C., Schefuß, E., and Sinninghe Damsté,
J. S.: Distributional variations in marine crenarchaeotal membrane lipids: A
new tool for reconstructing ancient sea water temperatures?, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 204, 265–274, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib146"><label>146</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schouten, S., Hopmans, E. C., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: The organic
geochemistry of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraether lipids: A review,
Org. Geochem., 54, 19–61, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib147"><label>147</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Selby, D.  and Creaser, R. A.: Re–Os geochronology of organic rich
sediments: an evaluation of organic matter analysis methods, Chem.
Geol., 200, 225–240, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib148"><label>148</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sharma, M., Papanastassiou, D. A., and Wasserburg, G. J.: The concentration and
isotopic composition of osmium in the oceans, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 61, 3287–3299, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib149"><label>149</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shaw Champion, M. E., White, N. J., Jones, S. M., and Lovell, J. P. B.:
Quantifying transient mantle convective uplift: An example from the
Faroe-Shetland basin, Tectonics 27, TC1002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007TC002106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007TC002106</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib150"><label>150</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Shephard, G., Müller, D., and Seton, M.: The tectonic evolution of the
Arctic since Pangea breakup: Integrating constraints from surface geology
and geophysics with mantle structure, Earth Sci. Rev., 124, 148–183,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib151"><label>151</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sluijs, A., Schouten, S., Pagani, M., Woltering, M., Brinkhuis, H.,
Sinninghe Damste, J. S., Dickens, G., Huber, M., Reichart, G.-J., Stein, R.,
Matthiessen, J., Lourens, L. J., Pedentchouk, N., Backman, J., Moran, K.,
Clemens, S., Cronin, T., Eynaud, F., Gattacceca, J., Jakobsson, M., Jordan,
R., Kaminski, M., King, J., Koc, N., Martinez, N., McInroy, D., Moore Jr.,
T. C., O'Regan, M., Onodera, J., Pälike, H., Rea, B., Rio, D., Sakamoto,
T., Smith, D. C., St John, K. E. K., Suto, I., Suzuki, N., Takahashi, K.,
Watanabe, M., and Yamamoto, M.: Subtropical Arctic Ocean temperatures during
the Paleocene/Eocene Thermal Maximum, Nature, 441, 610–613, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib152"><label>152</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sluijs, A., Brinkhuis, H., Schouten, S., Bohaty, S. M., John, C. M., Zachos,
J. C., Reichart, G.-J., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., Crouch, E. M., and
Dickens, G. R.: Environmental precursors to rapid light carbon injection at
the Palaeocene/Eocene boundary, Nature, 450, 12–18, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib153"><label>153</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sluijs, A., Brinkhuis, H., Crouch, E. M., John, C. M., Handley, L.,
Munsterman, D., Bohaty, S. M., Zachos, J. C., Reichart, G.-J., Schouten, S.,
Pancost, R. D., Sinninghe Damste, J. S., Welters, N. L. D., Lotter, A. F., and
Dickens, G. R.: Eustatic variations during the Paleocene-Eocene greenhouse
world, Paleoceanography, 23, PA1S11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008PA001615" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008PA001615</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib154"><label>154</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sluijs, A., Schouten, S., Donders, T. H., Schoon, P. L., Röhl, U.,
Reichart, G.-J., Sangiorgi, F., Kim, J.-H., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., and
Brinkhuis, H.: Warm and wet conditions in the Arctic region during Eocene
Thermal Maximum 2, Nat. Geosci., 2, 777–780, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib155"><label>155</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sluijs, A., Bijl, P. K., Schouten, S., Röhl, U., Reichart, G.-J., and Brinkhuis, H.: Southern ocean warming, sea level and hydrological change during the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum, Clim. Past, 7, 47–61, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-47-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-7-47-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib156"><label>156</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sluijs, A., van Roij, L., Harrington, G. J., Schouten, S., Sessa, J. A., LeVay, L. J., Reichart, G.-J., and Slomp, C. P.: Warming, euxinia and sea level rise during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum on the Gulf Coastal Plain: implications for ocean oxygenation and nutrient cycling, Clim. Past, 10, 1421–1439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1421-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-10-1421-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib157"><label>157</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sluijs, A., Frieling, J., Inglis, G. N., Nierop, K. G. J., Peterse, F., Sangiorgi, F., and Schouten, S.: Late Paleocene–early Eocene Arctic Ocean sea surface temperatures: reassessing biomarker paleothermometry at Lomonosov Ridge, Clim. Past, 16, 2381–2400, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2381-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-16-2381-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib158"><label>158</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Smith, V., Warny, S., Grice, K., Schaefer, B., Whalen, M. T., Vellekoop, J., Chenot, E., Gulick, S. P. S., Arenillas, I., Arz, J. A., Bauersachs, T., Bralower, T., Demory, F., Gattacceca, J., Jones, H., Lofi, J., Lowery, C. M., Morgan, J., Nuñez Otaño, N. B., O'Keefe, J. M. K., O'Malley, K., Rodríguez-Tovar, F. J., Schwark, L., and the IODP–ICDP Expedition 364 Scientists: Life and death in the Chicxulub impact crater: a record of the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, Clim. Past, 16, 1889–1899, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1889-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-16-1889-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib159"><label>159</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Speijer, R. P., Pälike, H., Hollis, C. J., Hooker, J. J., and Ogg, J. G.:
Chapter 28 – The Paleogene Period, in:  Geologic Time Scale 2020, edited by: Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., Schmitz,
M. D., and Ogg, G. M., Elsevier,  1087–1140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824360-2.00028-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-12-824360-2.00028-0</ext-link>,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1651?><ref id="bib1.bib160"><label>160</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stefánsson, A.  and Gíslason, S.R.: Chemical Weathering of Basalts,
Southwest Iceland: Effect of Rock Crystallinity and Secondary Minerals on
Chemical Fluxes to the Ocean, Am. J. Sci., 301, 513, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.301.6.513" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2475/ajs.301.6.513</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib161"><label>161</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Steinig, S., Dummann, W., Park, W., Latif, M., Kusch, S., Hofmann, P., and
Flögel, S.: Evidence for a regional warm bias in the Early Cretaceous
TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> record, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 539, 116184, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116184" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116184</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib162"><label>162</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Stoker, M. S., Holford, S. P., and Hillis, R. R.: A rift-to-drift record of
vertical crustal motions in the Faroe–Shetland Basin, NW European margin:
establishing constraints on NE Atlantic evolution, J. Geol.
Soc., 175, 263–274, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib163"><label>163</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stokke, E. W., Jones, M. T., Tierney, J. E., Svensen, H. H., and Whiteside,
J. H.: Temperature changes across the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum – a
new high-resolution TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature record from the Eastern North Sea
Basin, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 544, 116388, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116388" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116388</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib164"><label>164</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Stokke, E. W., Liu, E. J., and Jones, M. T.: Evidence of explosive
hydromagmatic eruptions during the emplacement of the North Atlantic Igneous
Province, Volcanica, 3, 227–250, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib165"><label>165</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stokke, E. W., Jones, M. T., Riber, L., Haflidason, H., Midtkandal, I., Schultz, B. P., and Svensen, H. H.: Rapid and sustained environmental responses to global warming: the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum in the eastern North Sea, Clim. Past, 17, 1989–2013, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1989-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-17-1989-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib166"><label>166</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Storey, M., Duncan, R., and Swisher III, C.: Paleocene-Eocene Thermal
Maximum and the opening of the Northeast Atlantic, Science, 316, 587–589,
2007a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib167"><label>167</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Storey, M., Duncan, R., and Tegner, C.: Timing and duration of volcanism in
the North Atlantic Igneous Province: Implications for geodynamics and links
to the Iceland hotspot, Chem. Geol., 241, 264–281, 2007b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib168"><label>168</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Straume, E. O., Nummelin, A., Gaina, C., and Nisancioglu, K. H.: Climate
transition at the Eocene-Oligocene influenced by bathymetric changes to the
Atlantic-Arctic oceanic gateways, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 119, e2115346119, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2115346119" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2115346119</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib169"><label>169</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Suan, G., Popescu, S.-M., Suc, J.-P., Schnyder, J., Fauquette, S., Baudin,
F., Yoon, D., Piepjohn, K., Sobolev, N. N., and Labrousse, L.: Subtropical
climate conditions and mangrove growth in Arctic Siberia during the early
Eocene, Geology, 45, 539–542, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G38547.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G38547.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib170"><label>170</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Svensen, H., Planke, S., Malthe-Sørenssen, Jamtveit, B., Myklebust, R.,
Rasmussen Eidem, T., and Rey, S.: Release of methane from a volcanic basin
as a mechanism for initial Eocene global warming, Nature, 429, 542–545, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib171"><label>171</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Svensen, H. H., Jones, M. T., Percival, L. M. E., Grasby, S. E., and Mather, T. A.: Release of mercury during contact metamorphism of shale: Implications for understanding the impacts of large igneous province volcanism, Earth  Planet. Sci. Lett., 619, 118306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118306" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118306</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib172"><label>172</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tomiyasu, T., Eguchi, T., Yamamoto, M., Anazawa, K., Sakamoto, H., Ando, T.,
Nedachi, M., and Marumo, K.: Influence of submarine fumaroles on the
distribution of mercury in the sediment of Kagoshima Bay, Japan, Mar.
Chem., 107, 173–183, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib173"><label>173</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tremblin, M., Khozyem, H., Adatte, T., Spangenberg, J.E., Fillon, C.,
Grauls, A., Hunger, T., Nowak, A., Läuchli, C., Lasseur, E., Roig,
J.-Y., Serrano, O., Calassou, S., Guillocheau, F., and Castelltort, S.:
Mercury enrichments of the Pyrenean foreland basins sediments support
enhanced volcanism during the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum (PETM),
Global   Planet. Change 212, 103794, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2022.103794" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2022.103794</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib174"><label>174</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Trommer, G., Siccha, M., van der Meer, M. T. J., Schouten, S., Sinninghe
Damsté, J. S., Schulz, H., Hemleben, C., and Kucera, M.: Distribution of
Crenarchaeota tetraether membrane lipids in surface sediments from the Red
Sea, Org. Geochem., 40, 724–731, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib175"><label>175</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van der Meulen, B., Gingerich, P. D., Lourens, L. J., Meijer, N., van
Broekhuizen, S., van Ginneken, S., and Abels, H. A.: Carbon isotope and
mammal recovery from extreme greenhouse warming at the Paleocene-Eocene
boundary in astronomically-calibrated fluvial strata, Bighorn Basin,
Wyoming, USA, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 534, 116044, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.116044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2019.116044</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib176"><label>176</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vickers, M. L., Lengger, S. K., Bernasconi, S. M., Thibault, N., Schultz, B. P.,
Fernandez, A., Ullmann, C. V., McCormack, P., Bjerrum, C. J., Rasmussen, J. A.,
Hougård, I. W., and Korte, C.: Cold spells in the Nordic Seas during the
early Eocene Greenhouse, Nat. Commun., 11, 4713, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18558-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-020-18558-7</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib177"><label>177</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Völkening, J., Walczyk, T., and Heumann, K. G.: Osmium isotope ratio
determinations by negative thermal ionization mass spectrometry,
Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 105, 147–159,
1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib178"><label>178</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Walters, G. L., Kemp, S. J., Hemingway, J. D., Johnston, D. T., and Hodell,
D. A.: Clay hydroxyl isotopes show an enhanced hydrologic cycle during the
Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, Nat. Commun., 13, 7885, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35545-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-022-35545-2</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib179"><label>179</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Weijers, J. W. H., Schouten, S., Sluijs, A., Brinkhuis, H., and Sinninghe
Damsté, J. S.: Warm arctic continents during the Palaeocene-Eocene
thermal maximum, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 261, 230–238, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib180"><label>180</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wessel, P., Smith, W., Scharroo, R., Luis, J., and Wobbe, F.: Generic
Mapping Tools: Improved 1542 Version Released. Eos T. Am.
Geophys. Un., 94, 409–410, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib181"><label>181</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
West, C. K., Greenwood, D. R., and Basinger, J. F.: Was the Arctic Eocene
“rainforest” monsoonal? Estimates of seasonal precipitation from early
Eocene megafloras from Ellesmere Island, Nunavut, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 427, 18–30, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib182"><label>182</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Westerhold, T., Röhl, U., McCarren, H. K., and Zachos, J. C.: Latest on
the absolute age of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM): New
insights from exact stratigraphic position of key ash layers <inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 287, 412–419, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib183"><label>183</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Westerhold, T., Röhl, U., Frederichs, T., Agnini, C., Raffi, I., Zachos, J. C., and Wilkens, R. H.: Astronomical calibration of the Ypresian timescale: implications for seafloor spreading rates and the chaotic behavior of the solar system?, Clim. Past, 13, 1129–1152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1129-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-13-1129-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib184"><label>184</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
White, N.  and Lovell, B.: Measuring the pulse of a plume with the
sedimentary record, Nature, 387, 888–891, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib185"><label>185</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wieczorek, R., Fantle, M. S., Kump, L. R., and Ravizza, G.: Geochemical
evidence for volcanic activity prior to and enhanced terrestrial weathering
during the Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,
119, 391–410, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1652?><ref id="bib1.bib186"><label>186</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wilkinson, C., Ganerød, M., Hendriks, B., and Eide, E.: Compilation and
appraisal of geochronological data from the North Atlantic Igneous Province
(NAIP), in:  The NE Atlantic
Region: A Reappraisal of Crustal Structure, Tectonostratigraphy and Magmatic
Evolution, edited by: Péron-Pinvidic, G., Hopper, J. R., Stoker, M. S., Gaina, C.,
Doornenbal, J. C., Funck, T., and Árting, U. E., Geological Society, London, Special Publications, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP447.10" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/SP447.10</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib187"><label>187</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Willard, D. A., Donders, T. H., Reichgelt, T., Greenwood, D. R., Sangiorgi, F.,
Peterse, F., Nierop, K. G. J., Frieling, J., Schouten, S., and Sluijs, A.:
Arctic vegetation, temperature, and hydrology during Early Eocene transient
global warming events, Global   Planet. Change, 178, 139–152, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib188"><label>188</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Willumsen, P. S.: Palynology of the Lower Eocene deposits of northwest
Jutland, Denmark, B. Geol. Soc. Denmark, 51, 141–157,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib189"><label>189</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yamashita, Y., Takahashi, Y., Haba, H., Enomoto, S., and Shimizu, H.:
Comparison of reductive accumulation of Re and Os in seawater–sediment
systems, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 71, 3458–3475, 2007.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib190"><label>190</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zachos, J., Dickens, G., and Zeebe, R.: An early Cenozoic perspective on
greenhouse warming and carbon-cycle dynamics, Nature, 451, 279–283, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib191"><label>191</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zacke, A., Voigt, S., Joachimski, M. M., Gale, A. S., Ward, D. J., and
Tütken, T.: Surface-water freshening and high-latitude river discharge
in the Eocene North Sea, J. Geol. Soc., 166, 969–980,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib192"><label>192</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zeebe, R. E.  and Lourens, L. J.: Solar System chaos and the Paleocene–Eocene
boundary age constrained by geology and astronomy, Science, 365, 926–929,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib193"><label>193</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zeebe, R. E., Zachos, J. C., and Dickens, G. R.: Carbon dioxide forcing alone
insufficient to explain Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum warming, Nat.
Geosci., 2, 576–580, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib194"><label>194</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. G., Pagani, M., and Wang, Z.: Ring Index: A new strategy to
evaluate the integrity of TEX86 paleothermometry, Paleoceanography, 31,
220–232, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Tracing North Atlantic volcanism and seaway connectivity across the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM)</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Abdelmalak, M. M., Planke, S., Faleide, J. I., Jerram, D. A., Zastrozhnov, D.,
Eide, S., and Myklebust, R.: The development of volcanic sequences at rifted
margins: New insights from the structure and morphology of the Vøring
Escarpment, mid-Norwegian Margin, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol.
Ea., 121, 5212–5236, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Anell, I., Thybo, H., and Rasmussen, E.: A synthesis of Cenozoic
sedimentation in the North Sea, Basin Res., 24, 154–179, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ayris, P.  and Delmelle, P.: Volcanic and atmospheric controls on ash iron solubility: A review, Phys. Chem. Earth, 45–46, 103–112,
2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Behar, F., Beaumont, V., and Penteado, H. L. D.: Rock-Eval 6 technology:
Performances and developments, Oil and Gas Science and Technology, 56,
111–134, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berndt, C., Planke, S., Alvarez Zarikian, C. A., Frieling, J., Jones, M. T., Millett, J. M., Brinkhuis, H., Bünz, S., Svensen, H. H., Longman, J., Scherer, R. P., Karstens, J., Manton, B., Nelissen, M., Reed, B., Faleide, J. I., Huismans, R. S., Agarwal, A., Andrews, G. D. M., Betlem, P., Bhattacharya, J., Chatterjee, S., Christopoulou, M., Clementi, V. J., Ferré, E. C., Filina, I. Y., Guo, P., Harper, D. T., Lambart, S., Mohn, G., Nakaoka R., Tegner, C., Varela, N., Wang, M., Xu, W., and Yager, S. L.: Shallow-water hydrothermal venting linked to the Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, Nat. Geosci., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01246-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01246-8</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bijl, P. K., Frieling, J., Cramwinckel, M. J., Boschman, C., Sluijs, A., and Peterse, F.: Maastrichtian–Rupelian paleoclimates in the southwest Pacific – a critical re-evaluation of biomarker paleothermometry and dinoflagellate cyst paleoecology at Ocean Drilling Program Site 1172, Clim. Past, 17, 2393–2425, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-2393-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-2393-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bindler, R.: Estimating the natural background atmospheric deposition rate
of mercury utilizing ombotrophic bogs in southern Sweden, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 37, 40–46, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Blaga, C. I., Reichart, G. J., Heiri, O., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.:
Tetraether membrane lipid distributions in water-column particulate matter
and sediments: A study of 47 European lakes along a north-south transect,
J. Paleolimnol., 41, 523–540, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bøggild, O. B.: Den vulkanske Aske i Moleret samt en Oversigt over Danmarks ældre Tertiærbjærgarter, B. Geol. Soc. Denmark, 33, 1–159, 1918.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bowen, G. and Zachos, J.: Rapid carbon sequestration at the termination of the Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, Nat. Geosci., 3, 866–869, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1014</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bowen, G. J.: Up in smoke: A role for organic carbon feedbacks in Paleogene hyperthermals, Global   Planet. Change, 109, 18–29, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.07.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.07.001</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boyden, J. A., Müller, D. R., Gurnis, M., Torsvik, T. H., Clark, J. A.,
Turner, M., Ivey-Law, H., Watson, R. J., and Cannon, J. S.: Next-generation
plate-tectonic reconstructions using GPlates, in:  Geoinformatics: Cyberinfrastructure for the Solid Earth Sciences, edited by: Keller, G. R. and Baru, C.,
Cambridge University Press,  95–114, ISBN 9780521897150, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Broeker, W. S.  and Peng, T.-H.: Tracers in the sea. Eldigio Press, Lamont
(Doherty Geological Observatory), <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200005221" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200005221</a>, 1982.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bujak, J. P.  and Mudge, D. C.: A high-resolution North Sea Eocene dinocyst
zonation, J. Geol. Soc., 151, 449–462, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.151.3.0449" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.151.3.0449</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Carmichael, M. J., Inglis, G. N., Badger, M. P., Naafs, B. D. A., Behrooz, L.,
Remmelzwaal, S., and Dickson, A. J.: Hydrological and associated
biogeochemical consequences of rapid global warming during the
Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, Global   Planet. Change, 157, 114–138,
2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Charles, A., Condon, D., Harding, I., Pälike, H., Marshall, J., Cui, Y.,
Kump, L., and Croudace, I.: Constraints on the numerical age of the
Palaeocene-Eocene boundary, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 12, Q0AA17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GC003426" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GC003426</a>,
2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Contreras, L., Pross, J., Bijl, P. K., O'Hara, R. B., Raine, J. I., Sluijs, A., and Brinkhuis, H.: Southern high-latitude terrestrial climate change during the Palaeocene–Eocene derived from a marine pollen record (ODP Site 1172, East Tasman Plateau), Clim. Past, 10, 1401–1420, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1401-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1401-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Conway-Jones, B. W.  and White, N.: Paleogene buried landscapes and climatic
aberrations triggered by mantle plume activity, Earth   Planet. Sc.
Lett., 593, 117644, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117644" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117644</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cramer, B. S., Toggweiler, J. R., Wright, J. D., Katz, M. E., and Miller, K. G.:
Ocean overturning since the Late Cretaceous: Inferences from a new benthic
foraminiferal isotope compilation, Paleoceanography 24, PA4216, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008PA001683" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008PA001683</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cramwinckel, M. J., Huber, M., Kocken, I. J., Agnini, C., Bijl, P. K., Bohaty,
S. M., Frieling, J., Goldner, A., Hilgen, F. J., Kip, E. L., Peterse, F., van
der Ploeg, R., Röhl, U., Schouten, S., and Sluijs, A.: Synchronous
tropical and polar temperature evolution in the Eocene, Nature, 559, 382–386,
2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Creaser, R. A., Papanastassiou, D. A., and Wasserburg, G. J.: Negative thermal
ion mass spectrometry of osmium, rhenium and iridium, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 55, 397–401, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Deconinck, J. F.  and Chamley, H.: Diversity of smectite origins in Late
Cretaceous sediments: example of chalks from northern France, Clay Miner.,
30, 365–379, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dellinger, M., Gaillardet, J., Bouchez, J., Calmels, D., Louvat, P.,
Dosseto, A., Gorge, C., Alanoca, L., and Maurice, L.: Riverine Li isotope
fractionation in the Amazon River basin controlled by the weathering
regimes, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 164, 71–93, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dellinger, M., Bouchez, J., Gaillardet, J., Faure, L., and Moureau, J.:
Tracing weathering regimes using the lithium isotope composition of detrital
sediments, Geology, 45, 411–414, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dessert, C., Dupré, B., Gaillardet, J., François, L., and
Allègre, C. J.: Basalt weathering laws and the impact of basalt
weathering on the global carbon cycle, Chem. Geol., 202, 257–273, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dickens, G. R., O'Neil, J. R., Rea, D. K., and Owen, R. M.: Dissociation of
oceanic methane hydrate as a cause of the carbon-isotope excursion at the
end of the Paleocene, Paleoceanography, 10, 965–971, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dickson, A. J., Cohen, A. S., Coe, A. L., Davies, M., Shcherbinina, E. A., and
Gavrilov, Y. O.: Evidence for weathering and volcanism during the PETM from
Arctic Ocean and Peri-Tethys osmium isotope records, Palaeogeogr.
Palaeocl., 438, 300–307, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dickson, A. J., Cohen, A. S., and Davies, M.: The Osmium Isotope Signature of
Phanerozoic Large Igneous Provinces, in:  Large Igneous Provinces: A Driver of Global Environmental and
Biotic Changes, edited by: Ernst, R. E., Dickson, A. J., and Bekker,
A., American Geophysical Union and John Wiley and Sons, Inc, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119507444.ch10" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119507444.ch10</a>,
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dunkley-Jones, T., Lunt, D. J., Schmidt, D. N., Ridgwell, A. J., Sluijs, A.,
Valdes, P. J., and Maslin, M. A.: Climate model and proxy data constraints on
ocean warming across the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, Earth Sci.
Rev., 125, 123–145, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dypvik, H., Riber, L., Burca, F., Rüther, D., Jargvoll, D., Nagy, J.,
and Jochmann, M.: The Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum in Svalbard – clay
mineral and geochemical signals, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 303, 156–169, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Egger, H.  and Brückl, E.: Gigantic volcanic eruptions and climatic
change in the early Eocene, Int. J. Earth Sci., 95,
1065–1070, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eldholm, O.  and Grue, K.: North Atlantic volcanic margins: dimensions and
production rates, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 2955–2968, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eldholm, O.  and Thomas, E.: Environmental impact of volcanic margin
formation, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 117, 319–329, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eldrett, J. S., Greenwood, D. R., Polling, M., Brinkhuis, H., and Sluijs, A.: A seasonality trigger for carbon injection at the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, Clim. Past, 10, 759–769, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-759-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-759-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ernst, R. E. and Youbi, N.: How Large Igneous Provinces affect global
climate, sometimes cause mass extinctions, and represent natural markers in
the geological record, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl.,
478, 30–52, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frieling, J., Iakovleva, A. I., Reichart, G.-J., Aleksandrova, G. N.,
Gnibidenko, Z. N., Schouten, S., and Sluijs, A.: Paleocene-Eocene warming and
biotic response in the epicontinental West Siberian Sea, Geology, 42,
767–770, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frieling, J., Svensen, H. H., Planke, S., Cramwinckel, M. J., Selnes, H., and
Sluijs, A.: Thermogenic methane release as a cause for the long duration of
the PETM, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113,
12059–12064, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frieling, J., Gebhardt, H., Huber, M., Adekeye, O. A., Akande, S. O.,
Reichart, G.-J., Middelburg, J. J., Schouten, S., and Sluijs, A.: Extreme
warmth and heat-stressed plankton in the tropics during the Paleocene-Eocene
Thermal Maximum, Science Advances, 3, e1600891, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600891" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600891</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frieling, J., Peterse, F., Lunt, D. J., Bohaty, S. M., Sinninghe Damsté,
J. S., Reichart, G. J., and Sluijs, A.: Widespread Warming Before and Elevated
Barium Burial During the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum: Evidence for
Methane Hydrate Release?, Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology, 34, 546–566,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frieling, J., Mather, T. A., März, C., Jenkyns, H., Hennekam, R.,
Reichart, G.-J., Slomp, C. P., and van Helmond, N.: Effects of redox
variability and early diagenesis on marine sedimentary Hg records,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 351, 78–95, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gernon, T. M., Barr, R., Fitton, J. G., Hincks, T. K., Keir, D., Longman, J.,
Meridith, A. S., Mitchell, R. N., and Palmer, M. R.: Transient mobilization of
subcrustal carbon coincident with Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, Nat.
Geosci., 15, 573–579, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Golonka, J.: Phanerozoic paleoenvironment and paleolithofacies
maps: Cenozoic, Geologia/Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im,
Stanisława Staszica w Krakowie, 35, 507–587, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gramlich, J. W., Murphy, T. J., Garner, E. L., and Shields, W. R.: Absolute
Isotopic Abundance Ratio and Atomic Weight of a Reference Sample of Rhenium,
J. Res. Natl. Bur.  Phys.  Ch., 77, 691–698, 1973.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grasby, S .E., Them II, T. R., Chen, Z., Yin, R., and Ardakani, O. H.: Mercury
as a proxy for volcanic emissions in the geologic record, Earth Sci.
Rev., 196, 102880, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102880" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102880</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gurnis, M., Turner, M., Zahirovic, S., DiCaprio, L., Spasojevic, S.,
Müller, R., Boyden, J., Seton, M., Manea, V., and Bower, D.: Plate
Tectonic Reconstructions with Continuously Closing Plates, Comput.
Geosci., 38, 35–42, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gutjahr, M., Ridgwell, A., Sexton, P. F., Anagnostou, E., Pearson, P. N.,
Pälike, H., Norris, R. D., Thomas, E., and Foster, G. L.: Very large
release of mostly volcanic carbon during the Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal
Maximum, Nature, 548, 573–577, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haaland, H. J., Furnes, H., and Martinsen, O. J.: Paleogene tuffaceous
intervals, Grane Field (Block 25/11), Norwegian North Sea: their
depositional, petrographicl, geochemical character and regional
implications, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 17, 101–118, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hansen, D. M.: The morphology of intrusion-related vent structures and their
implications for constraining the timing of intrusive events along the NE
Atlantic margin, J. Geol. Soc., 163, 789–800, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hartley, R. A., Roberts, G. G., White, N., and Richardson, C.: Transient
convective uplift of an ancient buried landscape, Nat. Geosci., 4,
562–565, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heilmann-Clausen, C.: Review of Paleocene dinoflagellates from the North Sea
region, GFF, 116, 51–53, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/11035899409546149" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/11035899409546149</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heilmann-Clausen, C.: Palæogene aflejringer over Danskekalken,
in: Aarhus Geokompendier, edited by: Nielsen, O. B., No. 1, Danmarks
geologi fra Kridt til i dag, 69–114, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heilmann-Clausen, C., Nielsen, O. B., and Gersner, F.: Lithostratigraphy and
depositional environments in the Upper Paleocene and Eocene of Denmark,
Bulletin – Geological Society of Denmark, 33, 287–323, 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heilmann-Clausen, C., Schultz, B. P., Beyer, C., Friis, H., Schoon, P. L., and
Tegner, C.: New evidence for NE Atlantic pre-PETM volcanism, Rendiconti
Online – Società Geologica Italiana, 31, 99–100, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heister, L. E., O'Day, P. A., Brooks, C. K., Neuhoff, P. S., and Bird, D. K.:
Pyroclastic deposits within the East Greenland Tertiary flood basalts,
J. Geol. Soc., 158, 269–284, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Horni, J., Hopper, J. R., Blischke, A., Geisler, W. H., Stewart, M.,
McDermott, K., Judge, M., Erlendsson, Ö., and Árting, U.: Regional
distribution of volcanism within the North Atlantic Igneous Province,
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 447, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP447.18" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/SP447.18</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hovikoski, J., Fyhn, M. B. W., Nøhr-Hansen, H., Hopper, J. R., Andrews, S.,
Barham, M., Nielsen, L. H., Bjerager, M., Bojesen-Koefoed, J., Lode, S.,
Sheldon, E., Uchman, A., Skorstengaard, P. R., and Alsen, P.:
Paleocene-Eocene volcanic segmentation of the Norwegian-Greenland seaway
reorganized high-latitude ocean circulation, Commun. Earth
Environ., 2, 172, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00249-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00249-w</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huurdeman, E. P., Frieling, J., Reichgelt, T., Bijl, P. K., Bohaty, S. M.,
Holdgate, G. R., Gallagher, S. J., Peterse, F., Greenwood, D. R., and Pross,
J.: Rapid expansion of meso-megathermal rain forests into the southern high
latitudes at the onset of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, Geology, 49,
40–44, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Inglis, G. N., Farnsworth, A., Lunt, D. J., Foster, G. L., Hollis, C. J.,
Pagani, M., Jardine, P. E., Pearson, P. N., Markwick, P. J., Galsworthy,
A. M. J., Raynham, L., Taylor, K. W. R., and Pancost, R. D.: Descent towards the
Icehouse: Eocene sea surface cooling inferred from GDGT distributions,
Paleoceanography, 30, 1000–1020, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Inglis, G. N., Bragg, F., Burls, N. J., Cramwinckel, M. J., Evans, D., Foster, G. L., Huber, M., Lunt, D. J., Siler, N., Steinig, S., Tierney, J. E., Wilkinson, R., Anagnostou, E., de Boer, A. M., Dunkley Jones, T., Edgar, K. M., Hollis, C. J., Hutchinson, D. K., and Pancost, R. D.: Global mean surface temperature and climate sensitivity of the early Eocene Climatic Optimum (EECO), Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), and latest Paleocene, Clim. Past, 16, 1953–1968, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1953-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1953-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jin, S., Kemp, D. B., Jolley, D. W., Vieira, M., Zachos, J. C., Huang, C., Li,
M., and Chen, W.: Large-scale, astronomically paced sediment input to the
North Sea Basin during the Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum, Earth
Planet. Sc. Lett., 579, 117340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117340" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117340</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
John, C. M., Bohaty, S. M., Zachos, J. C., Sluijs, A., Gibbs, S., Brinkhuis,
H., and Bralower, T. J.: North American continental margin records of the
Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum: Implications for global carbon and
hydrological cycling, Paleoceanography 23, PA2217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007PA001465" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007PA001465</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jones, M. T.: The environmental and climatic impacts of volcanic ash
deposition, in:
Volcanism and global environmental change, edited by:  Schmidt, A., Fristad, K., and Elkins-Tanton, L., Cambridge University Press,
260–274, ISBN 9781107058378, 1107058376, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jones, M. T., Jerram, D. A., Svensen, H. H., and Grove, C.: The effects of
large igneous provinces on the global carbon and sulphur cycles,
Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 441, 4–21, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jones, M. T., Percival, L. M. E., Stokke, E. W., Frieling, J., Mather, T. A., Riber, L., Schubert, B. A., Schultz, B., Tegner, C., Planke, S., and Svensen, H. H.: Mercury anomalies across the Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, Clim. Past, 15, 217–236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-217-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-217-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jones, S. M., Hoggett, M., Greene, S. E., and Dunkley Jones, T.: Large Igneous
Province thermogenic greenhouse gas flux could have initiated
Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum climate change, Nat. Commun., 10,
5547, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12957-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12957-1</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kaya, M. Y., Dupont-Nivet, G., Frieling, J., Fioroni, C., Rohrmann, A., Altıner, S. Ö., Vardar, E., Tanyaş, H., Mamtimin, M., and Zhaojie, G.:
The Eurasian epicontinental sea was an important carbon sink during the
Palaeocene-Eocene thermal maximum, Commun. Earth Environ., 3,
124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00451-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00451-4</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Keller, G., Mateo, P., Punekar, J., Khozyem, H., Gertsch, B., Spangenberg,
J., Bitchong, A., and Adatte, T.: Environmental changes during the
cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction and Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum:
Implications for the Anthropocene, Gondwana Res., 56, 69–89, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kendall, B. S., Creaser, R. A., Ross, G. M., and Selby, D.: Constraints on the
timing of Marinoan “Snowball Earth” glaciation by <sup>187</sup>Re–<sup>187</sup>Os dating of a
Neoproterozoic, post-glacial black shale in Western Canada, Earth
Planet. Sc. Lett., 222, 729–740, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kender, S., Stephenson, M. H., Riding, J. B., Leng, M. J., Knox, R. B., Peck,
V. L., Kendrick, C. P., Ellis, M. A., Vane, C. H., and Jamieson, R.: Marine and
terrestrial environmental changes in NW Europe preceding carbon release at
the Paleocene–Eocene transition, Earth   Planet. Sc. Lett.,
353–354, 108–120, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kender, S., Bogus, K., Pedersen, G. K., Dybkjær, K., Mather, T. A.,
Mariani, E., Ridgwell, A., Riding, J. B., Wagner, T., Hesselbo, S. P., and
Leng, M. J.: Paleocene/Eocene carbon feedbacks triggered by volcanic
activity, Nat. Commun., 12, 5186, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25536-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25536-0</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kennett, J. and Stott, L.: Abrupt deep-sea warming, palaeoceanographic
changes and benthic extinctions at the end of the Palaeocene, Nature, 353,
225–229, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kim, J. H., van der Meer, J., Schouten, S., Helmke, P., Willmott, V.,
Sangiorgi, F., Koç, N., Hopmans, E. C., and Damsté, J. S. S.: New
indices and calibrations derived from the distribution of crenarchaeal
isoprenoid tetraether lipids: Implications for past sea surface temperature
reconstructions, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 74, 4639–4654, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
King, C.: A Revised Correlation of Tertiary Rocks in the British Isles and
Adjacent Areas of NW Europe, The Geological Society, London, ISBN 978-1-86239-728-6, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kirtland Turner, S.: Constraints on the onset duration of the
Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, Philos. T. R.
Soc. A, 376, 20170082, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0082" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0082</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kisakürek, B., James, R. H., and Harris, N. B. W.: Li and <i>δ</i>7Li in
Himalayan rivers: Proxies for silicate weathering?, Earth  Planet.
Sc. Lett., 237, 387–401, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Knox, R. B.  and Morton, A.: The record of early Tertiary N Atlantic
volcanism in sediments of the North Sea Basin, in:  Early Tertiary Volcanism and the opening of the NE Atlantic, edited by: Morton, A. and Parson, L.,
Geological Society Special Publication,  407–419, 1988.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Knox, R. W. O. B.: Nannoplankton zonation and the Palaeocene/Eocene boundary
beds of NW Europe: an indirect correlation by means of volcanic ash layers,
J. Geol. Soc., 141, 993–999, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
      
Knox, R. W. O. B.: Stratigraphic significance of volcanic ash in Paleocene and
Eocene sediments at Sites 549 and 550,  edited by: Graciansky, P. C. D., Poag, C. W.,
al., Initial Reports DSDP. U.S. Government Printing Office,
Washington,  845–850, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.80.134.1985" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.80.134.1985</a>,
1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kuiper, K., Deino, A., Hilgen, F., Krijgsman, W., Renne, P., and Wijbrans,
J.: Synchronizing rock clocks of Earth history, Science, 320, 500–504, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
      
Larsen, L., Fitton, J., and Pedersen, A.: Paleogene volcanic ash layers in
the Danish Basin: compositions and source areas in the North Atlantic
Igneous Province, Lithos, 71, 47–80, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
      
Larsen, R. B.  and Tegner, C.: Pressure conditions for the solidification of
the Skaergaard intrusion: Eruption of East Greenland flood basalts in less
than 300,000 years, Lithos, 92, 181–197, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
      
Levasseur, S., Birck, J. L., and Allègre, C. J.: The osmium riverine flux
and the oceanic mass balance of osmium, Earth   Planet. Sc. Lett.,
174, 7–23, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, M., Bralower, T. J., Kump, L. R., Self-Trail, J. M., Zachos, J. C., Rush,
W. D., and Robinson, M. M.: Astrochronology of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal
Maximum on the Atlantic Coastal Plain, Nat. Commun., 13, 5618, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33390-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33390-x</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, Y., Clift, P. D., Murray, R. W., Exnicios, E., Ireland, T., and
Böning, P.: Asian summer monsoon influence on chemical weathering and
sediment provenance determined by clay mineral analysis from the Indus
Submarine Canyon, Quaternary Res., 93, 23–39, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
      
Littler, K., Röhl, U., Westerhold, T., and Zachos, J. C.: A
high-resolution benthic stable-isotope record for the South Atlantic:
Implications for orbital-scale changes in Late Paleocene–Early Eocene
climate and carbon cycling, Earth   Planet. Sc. Lett., 401, 18–30,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, J.  and Pearson, D.G.: Rapid, precise and accurate Os isotope ratio
measurements of nanogram to sub-nanogram amounts using multiple Faraday
collectors and amplifiers equipped with 1012 Ω resistors by N-TIMS,
Chem. Geol., 363, 301–311, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Z., Horton, D. E., Tabor, C., Sageman, B. B., Percival, L. M. E., Gill,
B. C., and Selby, D.: Assessing the Contributions of Comet Impact and
Volcanism Toward the Climate Perturbations of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal
Maximum, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 14798–14806, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
      
Longman, J., Gernon, T. M., Palmer, M. R., Jones, M. T., Stokke, E. W., and
Svensen, H. H.: Marine diagenesis of tephra aided the Palaeocene-Eocene
Thermal Maximum termination, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 571,
117101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117101" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117101</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lourens, L. J., Sluijs, A., Kroon, D., Zachos, J. C., Thomas, E., Röhl,
U., Bowles, J., and Raffi, I.: Astronomical pacing of late Palaeocene to
early Eocene global warming events, Nature, 435, 1083–1087, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lowe, D.: Tephrochronology and its application: a review, Quaternary Geology,
6, 107–153, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
      
Luguet, A., Nowell, G. M., and Pearson, D. G.: <sup>184</sup>Os&thinsp;∕&thinsp;<sup>188</sup>Os and <sup>186</sup>Os&thinsp;∕&thinsp;<sup>188</sup>Os
measurements by Negative Thermal Ionisation Mass Spectrometry (N-TIMS):
Effects of interfering element and mass fractionation corrections on data
accuracy and precision, Chem. Geol., 248, 342–362, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
      
Maclennan, J. and Jones, S. M.: Regional uplift, gas hydrate dissociation
and the origins of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 245, 65–80, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
      
Manton, B., Müller, P., Mazzini, A., Zastrozhnov, D., Jerram, D. A.,
Millett, J. M., Schmid, D. W., Berndt, C., Myklebust, R., and Planke, S.:
Characterizing ancient and modern hydrothermal venting systems, Mar.
Geol., 447, 106781, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2022.106781" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2022.106781</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
      
Martin, C. E., Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B., Brunskill, G., and Szymczak, R.:
Osmium isotope geochemistry of a tropical estuary, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 65, 3193–3200, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
      
McInerney, F. A.  and Wing, S. L.: The Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum: a
perturbation of carbon cycle, climate, and biosphere with implications for
the future, Annu. Rev. Earth   Pl. Sc., 39, 489–516, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
      
Meisel, T., Walker, R. J., Irving, A. J., and Lorand, J.-P.: Osmium isotopic
compositions of mantle xenoliths: a global perspective, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 65, 1311–1323, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
      
Misra, S. and Froelich, P. N.: Lithium isotope history of cenozoic seawater:
Changes in silicate weathering and reverse weathering, Science, 335, 818–823,
2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moore, D. M.  and Reynolds, R. C.: X-ray diffraction and the identification
and analysis of clay minerals, Oxford University Press, Oxford, ISBN 9780195051704, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
      
Murphy, B., Farley, K., and Zachos, J.: An extra-terrestrial 3He-based
timescale for the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum (PETM) from Walvis Ridge
IODP Site 1266, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 74, 5098–5108, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nielsen, O. B.: Danmarks geologi fra Kridt til i dag, Aarhus Geokompendie, 1,
1–13, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nielsen, O. B., Rasmussen, E. S., and Thyberg, B. I.: Distribution of Clay
Minerals In the Northern North Sea Basin During the Paleogene and Neogene: A
Result of Source-Area Geology and Sorting Processes, J. Sediment.
Res., 85, 562–581, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
      
O'Brien, C. L., Robinson, S. A., Pancost, R. D., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.,
Schouten, S., Lunt, D. J., Alsenz, H., Bornemann, A., Bottini, C., Brassell,
S. C., Farnsworth, A., Forster, A., Huber, B. T., Inglis, G. N., Jenkyns, H. C.,
Linnert, C., Littler, K., Markwick, P., McAnena, A., Mutterlose, J., Naafs,
B. D. A., Püttmann, W., Sluijs, A., van Helmond, N. A. G. M., Vellekoop, J., Wagner,
T., and Wrobel, N.E.: Cretaceous sea-surface temperature evolution:
Constraints from TEX<sub>86</sub> and planktonic foraminiferal oxygen isotopes, Earth
Sci. Rev., 172, 224–247, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
      
Olsson, J., Stipp, S. L. S., Makovicky, E., and Gislason, S. R.: Metal
scavenging by calcium carbonate at the Eyjafjallajökull volcano: A
carbon capture and storage analogue, Chem. Geol., 384, 135–148, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
      
Outridge, P. M., Sanei, H., Stern, G. A., Hamilton, P. B., and Goodarzi, F.:
Evidence for control of mercury accumulation rates in Canadian High Arctic
lake sediments by variations of aquatic primary productivity, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 41, 5259–5265, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pagani, M., Pedentchouk, N., Huber, M., Sluijs, A., Schouten, S., Brinkhuis,
H., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., Dickens, G. R., and Expedition 302
Scientists: Arctic hydrology during global warming at the Palaeocene/Eocene
Thermal Maximum, Nature 442, 671–675, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
      
Papadomanolaki, N. M., Sluijs, A., and Slomp, C. P.: Eutrophication and
Deoxygenation Forcing of Marginal Marine Organic Carbon Burial During the
PETM, Paleoceanogr. Paleocl., 37, e2021PA004232, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021PA004232" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021PA004232</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paquay, F. S.  and Ravizza, G.: Heterogeneous seawater <sup>187</sup>Os&thinsp;∕&thinsp;<sup>188</sup>Os during the
Late Pleistocene glaciations, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 349–350,
126–138, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paque, M., Detienne, M., Maters, E. C., and Delmelle, P.: Smectites and
zeolites in ash from the 2010 summit eruption of Eyjafjallajökull
volcano, Iceland, B. Volcanol., 78, 61, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-016-1056-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-016-1056-x</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
      
Passey, S. R. and Jolley, D. W.: A revised lithostratigraphic nomenclature
for the Palaeogene Faroe Islands Basalt Group, NE Atlantic Ocean,
T. RSE Eath, 99, 127–158, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pedersen, G. K., Pedersen, S. A. S., Steffensen, J., and Pedersen, C. S.: Clay
content of a clayey diatomite, the Early Eocene Fur Formation, Denmark,
B. Geol. Soc. Denmark, 51, 159–177, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pedersen, S. A. S.: Architecture of Glaciotectonic Complexes, Geosciences, 4,
269–296, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
      
Percival, L. M. E., Witt, M. L. I., Mather, T. A., Hermoso, M., Jenkyns, H. C.,
Hesselbo, S. P., Al-Suwaidi, A. H., Storm, M. S., Xu, W., and Ruhl, M.:
Globally enhanced mercury deposition during the end-Pliensbachian extinction
and Toarcian OAE: A link to the Karoo-Ferrar Large Igneous Province, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 428, 267–280, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
      
Percival, L. M. E., Jenkyns, H. C., Mather, T. A., Dickson, A. J., Batenburg,
S. J., Ruhl, M., Hesselbo, S. P., Barclay, R., Jarvis, I., Robinson, S. A., and
Woelders, L.: Does large igneous province volcanism always perturb the
mercury cycle? Comparing the records of Oceanic Anoxic Event 2 and the
end-Cretaceous to other Mesozoic events, Am. J. Sci., 318,
799–860, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
      
Percival, L. M. E., Bergquist, B. A., Mather, T. A., and Sanei, H.: Sedimentary
Mercury Enrichments as a Tracer of Large Igneous Province Volcanism, in:
Large Igneous Provinces: A
Driver of Global Environmental and Biotic Changes, edited by: Ernst, R. E., Dickson, A. J., and Bekker, A., American Geophyiscal
Union, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119507444.ch11" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119507444.ch11</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B.  and Jahn, B.-M.: Rhenium-osmium isotope systematics
and platinum group element concentrations: Loess and the upper continental
crust, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 2, 1061, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000172" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000172</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B.  and Ravizza, G.: The marine osmium isotope record,
Terra Nova, 12, 205–219, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B. and Ravizza, G. E.:   Chapter 8 – Osmium Isotope
Stratigraphy,   Geologic Time Scale 2020, edited by: Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., Schmitz, M. D., and Ogg, G. M., Elsevier,  239–257, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824360-2.00008-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824360-2.00008-5</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>
      
Planke, S., Rasmussen, T., Rey, S., and Myklebust, R.: Seismic
characteristics and distribution of volcanic intrusions and hydrothermal
vent complexes in the Vøring and Møre basins, in: Petroleum Geology: North-West Europe and Global
Perspectives – Proceedings of the 6th Petroleum Geology Conference, edited by: Doré, A. G. and
Vining, B. A.,
Geological Society, London,  833–844, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>
      
Planke, S., Berndt, C., Alvarez Zarikian, C. A., and the Expedition 396
Scientists: Mid-Norwegian Margin Magmatism and Paleoclimate Implications,
Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, Volume 396, <a href="https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.396.2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.396.2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pogge von Strandmann, P. A. E., Burton, K. W., Opfergelt, S., Eiriksdottir,
E. S., Murphy, M. J., Einarsson, A., and Gislason, S. R.: The effect of
hydrothermal spring weathering processes and primary productivity on lithium
isotopes: Lake Myvatn, Iceland, Chem. Geol., 445, 4–13, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pogge von Strandmann, P. A. E., Desrochers, A., Murphy, M. J., Finlay, A. J.,
Selby, D., and Lenton, T. M.: Global climate stabilisation by chemical
weathering during the Hirnantian glaciation, Geochemical Perspective Letters,
3, 230–237, 2017a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pogge von Strandmann, P. A. E., Frings, P. J., and Murphy, M. J.: Lithium
isotope behaviour during weathering in the Ganges Alluvial Plain, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 198, 17–31, 2017b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pogge von Strandmann, P. A. E., Fraser, W. T., Hammond, S. J., Tarbuck, G.,
Wood, I. G., Oelkers, E. H., and Murphy, M. J.: Experimental determination of
Li isotope behaviour during basalt weathering, Chem. Geol., 517, 34–43,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pogge von Strandmann, P. A. E., Kasemann, S. A., and Wimpenny, J. B.: Lithium
and lithium isotopes in Earth's surface cycles, Elements, 16, 253–258, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pogge von Strandmann, P. A. E., Jones, M. T., West, A. J., Murphy, M. J., Stokke,
E. W., Tarbuck, G., Wilson, D. J., Pearce, C. R., and Schmidt, D. N.: Lithium
isotope evidence for enhanced weathering and erosion during the
Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, Science Advances, 7, eabh4224, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abh4224" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abh4224</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>
      
Powers, L., Werne, J. P., Vanderwoude, A. J., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.,
Hopmans, E. C., and Schouten, S.: Applicability and calibration of the TEX<sub>86</sub>
paleothermometer in lakes, Org. Geochem., 41, 404–413, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prøis, B. M.: Late Paleocene – earliest Eocene prograding system in the
SW Barents Sea, Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, p. 76, <a href="https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/45547" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 August 2023), 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pujalte, V., Baceta, J. I., and Schmitz, B.: A massive input of coarse-grained siliciclastics in the Pyrenean Basin during the PETM: the missing ingredient in a coeval abrupt change in hydrological regime, Clim. Past, 11, 1653–1672, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-1653-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-1653-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pyle, D. M.  and Mather, T. A.: The importance of volcanic emissions for
global atmospheric mercury cycle, Atmos. Environ., 37, 5115–5124,
2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation>
      
Racionero-Gómez, B., Sproson, A. D., Selby, D., Gannoun, A., Gröcke,
D. R., Greenwell, H. C., and Burton, K. W.: Osmium uptake, distribution, and
<sup>187</sup>Os&thinsp;∕&thinsp;<sup>188</sup>Os and <sup>187</sup>Re&thinsp;∕&thinsp;<sup>188</sup>Os compositions in Phaeophyceae macroalgae, Fucus
vesiculosus: Implications for determining the <sup>187</sup>Os&thinsp;∕&thinsp;<sup>188</sup>Os composition of
seawater, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 199, 48–57, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><mixed-citation>
      
Radionova, E. P., Beniamovski, V. N., Iakovleva, A. I., Muzylöv, N. G.,
Oreshkina, T. V., Shcherbinina, E. A., and Kozlova, G. E.: Early Paleogene
transgressions: Stratigraphical and sedimentological evidence from the
northern Peri-Tethys, in:  Causes and consequences of globally warm climates in the early
Paleogene, Geological Society of America Special Paper, edited by: Wing, S. L., Gingerich, P. D., Schmitz, B., and Thomas,
E., Boulder, Colordao,
239–261, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0-8137-2369-8.239" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/0-8137-2369-8.239</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rateau, R., Schofield, N., and Smith, M.: The potential role of igneous
intrusions on hydrocarbon migration, West of Shetland, Petrol. Geosci.,
19, 259–272, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib133"><label>133</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ravizza, G., Norris, R. D., Blusztajn, J., and Aubry, M.-P.: An osmium
isotope excursion associated with the late Paleocene thermal maximum:
Evidence of intensified chemical weathering, Paleoceanography 16, 155–163,
2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib134"><label>134</label><mixed-citation>
      
Reynolds III, R. C.  and Reynolds Jr., R. C.: NEWMOD II a computer program for
the calculation of one-dimensional diffraction patterns of mixed-layered
clays, 1526 Farlow Avenue, Crofton, MD, 21114, USA, <a href="https://newmod-for-clays.com" target="_blank"/> (last access: 30 July 2023), 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib135"><label>135</label><mixed-citation>
      
Reynolds, P., Planke, S., Millett, J. M., Jerram, D. A., Trulsvik, M., and
Schofield, N.: Hydrothermal vent complexes offshore Northeast Greenland: A
potential role in driving the PETM, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 467,
72–78, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib136"><label>136</label><mixed-citation>
      
Roberts, C. D., LeGrande, A. N., and Tripati, A. K.: Climate sensitivity to
Arctic seway restriction during the early Paleogene, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 286, 576–585, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib137"><label>137</label><mixed-citation>
      
Röhl, U., Westerhold, T., Bralower, T., and Zachos, J.: On the duration
of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), Geochem. Geophy.
Geosy., 8, Q12002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001784" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001784</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib138"><label>138</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rooney, A. D., Selby, D., Lloyd, J. M., Roberts, D. H., Lückge, A.,
Sageman, B. B., and Prouty, N. G.: Tracking millennial-scale Holocene glacial
advance and retreat using osmium isotopes: Insights from the Greenland ice
sheet, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 138, 49–61, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib139"><label>139</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sanei, H., Grasby, S., and Beauchamp, B.: Latest Permian mercury anomalies,
Geology, 40, 63–66, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib140"><label>140</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sato, H., Onoue, T., Nozaki, T., and Suzuki, K.: Osmium isotope evidence for
a large Late Triassic impact event, Nat. Commun., 4, 2455, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3455" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3455</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib141"><label>141</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schmitz, B., Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B., Heilmann-Clausen, C., Aberg, G., Asaro,
F., and Lee, C.-T. A.: Basaltic explosive volcanism, but no comet impact, at
the Paleocene–Eocene boundary: high-resolution chemical and isotopic
records from Egypt, Spain and Denmark, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
225, 1–17, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib142"><label>142</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schoene, B., Eddy, M. P., Samperton, K. M., Keller, C. B., Keller, G., Adatte,
T., and Khadri, S. F. R.: U-Pb constraints on pulsed eruption of the Deccan
Traps across the end-Cretaceous mass extinction, Science, 363, 862–866, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib143"><label>143</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schoon, P. L., Heilmann-Clausen, C., Schultz, B. P., Sluijs, A., Damasté,
J. S. S., and Schouten, S.: Recognition of Early Eocene global carbon isotope
excursions using lipids of marine Thaumarchaeota, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 373, 160–168, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib144"><label>144</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schoon, P. L., Heilmann-Clausen, C., Schultz, B. P., Damasté, J. S. S., and
Schouten, S.: Warming and environmental changes in the eastern North Sea
Basin during the Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum as revealed by biomarker
lipids, Org. Geochem., 78, 79–88, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib145"><label>145</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schouten, S., Hopmans, E. C., Schefuß, E., and Sinninghe Damsté,
J. S.: Distributional variations in marine crenarchaeotal membrane lipids: A
new tool for reconstructing ancient sea water temperatures?, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 204, 265–274, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib146"><label>146</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schouten, S., Hopmans, E. C., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: The organic
geochemistry of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraether lipids: A review,
Org. Geochem., 54, 19–61, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib147"><label>147</label><mixed-citation>
      
Selby, D.  and Creaser, R. A.: Re–Os geochronology of organic rich
sediments: an evaluation of organic matter analysis methods, Chem.
Geol., 200, 225–240, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib148"><label>148</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sharma, M., Papanastassiou, D. A., and Wasserburg, G. J.: The concentration and
isotopic composition of osmium in the oceans, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 61, 3287–3299, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib149"><label>149</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shaw Champion, M. E., White, N. J., Jones, S. M., and Lovell, J. P. B.:
Quantifying transient mantle convective uplift: An example from the
Faroe-Shetland basin, Tectonics 27, TC1002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007TC002106" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007TC002106</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib150"><label>150</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shephard, G., Müller, D., and Seton, M.: The tectonic evolution of the
Arctic since Pangea breakup: Integrating constraints from surface geology
and geophysics with mantle structure, Earth Sci. Rev., 124, 148–183,
2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib151"><label>151</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sluijs, A., Schouten, S., Pagani, M., Woltering, M., Brinkhuis, H.,
Sinninghe Damste, J. S., Dickens, G., Huber, M., Reichart, G.-J., Stein, R.,
Matthiessen, J., Lourens, L. J., Pedentchouk, N., Backman, J., Moran, K.,
Clemens, S., Cronin, T., Eynaud, F., Gattacceca, J., Jakobsson, M., Jordan,
R., Kaminski, M., King, J., Koc, N., Martinez, N., McInroy, D., Moore Jr.,
T. C., O'Regan, M., Onodera, J., Pälike, H., Rea, B., Rio, D., Sakamoto,
T., Smith, D. C., St John, K. E. K., Suto, I., Suzuki, N., Takahashi, K.,
Watanabe, M., and Yamamoto, M.: Subtropical Arctic Ocean temperatures during
the Paleocene/Eocene Thermal Maximum, Nature, 441, 610–613, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib152"><label>152</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sluijs, A., Brinkhuis, H., Schouten, S., Bohaty, S. M., John, C. M., Zachos,
J. C., Reichart, G.-J., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., Crouch, E. M., and
Dickens, G. R.: Environmental precursors to rapid light carbon injection at
the Palaeocene/Eocene boundary, Nature, 450, 12–18, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib153"><label>153</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sluijs, A., Brinkhuis, H., Crouch, E. M., John, C. M., Handley, L.,
Munsterman, D., Bohaty, S. M., Zachos, J. C., Reichart, G.-J., Schouten, S.,
Pancost, R. D., Sinninghe Damste, J. S., Welters, N. L. D., Lotter, A. F., and
Dickens, G. R.: Eustatic variations during the Paleocene-Eocene greenhouse
world, Paleoceanography, 23, PA1S11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008PA001615" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008PA001615</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib154"><label>154</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sluijs, A., Schouten, S., Donders, T. H., Schoon, P. L., Röhl, U.,
Reichart, G.-J., Sangiorgi, F., Kim, J.-H., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., and
Brinkhuis, H.: Warm and wet conditions in the Arctic region during Eocene
Thermal Maximum 2, Nat. Geosci., 2, 777–780, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib155"><label>155</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sluijs, A., Bijl, P. K., Schouten, S., Röhl, U., Reichart, G.-J., and Brinkhuis, H.: Southern ocean warming, sea level and hydrological change during the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum, Clim. Past, 7, 47–61, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-47-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-47-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib156"><label>156</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sluijs, A., van Roij, L., Harrington, G. J., Schouten, S., Sessa, J. A., LeVay, L. J., Reichart, G.-J., and Slomp, C. P.: Warming, euxinia and sea level rise during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum on the Gulf Coastal Plain: implications for ocean oxygenation and nutrient cycling, Clim. Past, 10, 1421–1439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1421-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1421-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib157"><label>157</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sluijs, A., Frieling, J., Inglis, G. N., Nierop, K. G. J., Peterse, F., Sangiorgi, F., and Schouten, S.: Late Paleocene–early Eocene Arctic Ocean sea surface temperatures: reassessing biomarker paleothermometry at Lomonosov Ridge, Clim. Past, 16, 2381–2400, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2381-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2381-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib158"><label>158</label><mixed-citation>
      
Smith, V., Warny, S., Grice, K., Schaefer, B., Whalen, M. T., Vellekoop, J., Chenot, E., Gulick, S. P. S., Arenillas, I., Arz, J. A., Bauersachs, T., Bralower, T., Demory, F., Gattacceca, J., Jones, H., Lofi, J., Lowery, C. M., Morgan, J., Nuñez Otaño, N. B., O'Keefe, J. M. K., O'Malley, K., Rodríguez-Tovar, F. J., Schwark, L., and the IODP–ICDP Expedition 364 Scientists: Life and death in the Chicxulub impact crater: a record of the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, Clim. Past, 16, 1889–1899, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1889-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1889-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib159"><label>159</label><mixed-citation>
      
Speijer, R. P., Pälike, H., Hollis, C. J., Hooker, J. J., and Ogg, J. G.:
Chapter 28 – The Paleogene Period, in:  Geologic Time Scale 2020, edited by: Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., Schmitz,
M. D., and Ogg, G. M., Elsevier,  1087–1140, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824360-2.00028-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824360-2.00028-0</a>,
2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib160"><label>160</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stefánsson, A.  and Gíslason, S.R.: Chemical Weathering of Basalts,
Southwest Iceland: Effect of Rock Crystallinity and Secondary Minerals on
Chemical Fluxes to the Ocean, Am. J. Sci., 301, 513, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.301.6.513" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.301.6.513</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib161"><label>161</label><mixed-citation>
      
Steinig, S., Dummann, W., Park, W., Latif, M., Kusch, S., Hofmann, P., and
Flögel, S.: Evidence for a regional warm bias in the Early Cretaceous
TEX<sub>86</sub> record, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 539, 116184, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116184" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116184</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib162"><label>162</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stoker, M. S., Holford, S. P., and Hillis, R. R.: A rift-to-drift record of
vertical crustal motions in the Faroe–Shetland Basin, NW European margin:
establishing constraints on NE Atlantic evolution, J. Geol.
Soc., 175, 263–274, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib163"><label>163</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stokke, E. W., Jones, M. T., Tierney, J. E., Svensen, H. H., and Whiteside,
J. H.: Temperature changes across the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum – a
new high-resolution TEX<sub>86</sub> temperature record from the Eastern North Sea
Basin, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 544, 116388, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116388" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116388</a>, 2020a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib164"><label>164</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stokke, E. W., Liu, E. J., and Jones, M. T.: Evidence of explosive
hydromagmatic eruptions during the emplacement of the North Atlantic Igneous
Province, Volcanica, 3, 227–250, 2020b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib165"><label>165</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stokke, E. W., Jones, M. T., Riber, L., Haflidason, H., Midtkandal, I., Schultz, B. P., and Svensen, H. H.: Rapid and sustained environmental responses to global warming: the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum in the eastern North Sea, Clim. Past, 17, 1989–2013, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1989-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1989-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib166"><label>166</label><mixed-citation>
      
Storey, M., Duncan, R., and Swisher III, C.: Paleocene-Eocene Thermal
Maximum and the opening of the Northeast Atlantic, Science, 316, 587–589,
2007a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib167"><label>167</label><mixed-citation>
      
Storey, M., Duncan, R., and Tegner, C.: Timing and duration of volcanism in
the North Atlantic Igneous Province: Implications for geodynamics and links
to the Iceland hotspot, Chem. Geol., 241, 264–281, 2007b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib168"><label>168</label><mixed-citation>
      
Straume, E. O., Nummelin, A., Gaina, C., and Nisancioglu, K. H.: Climate
transition at the Eocene-Oligocene influenced by bathymetric changes to the
Atlantic-Arctic oceanic gateways, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 119, e2115346119, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2115346119" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2115346119</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib169"><label>169</label><mixed-citation>
      
Suan, G., Popescu, S.-M., Suc, J.-P., Schnyder, J., Fauquette, S., Baudin,
F., Yoon, D., Piepjohn, K., Sobolev, N. N., and Labrousse, L.: Subtropical
climate conditions and mangrove growth in Arctic Siberia during the early
Eocene, Geology, 45, 539–542, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G38547.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G38547.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib170"><label>170</label><mixed-citation>
      
Svensen, H., Planke, S., Malthe-Sørenssen, Jamtveit, B., Myklebust, R.,
Rasmussen Eidem, T., and Rey, S.: Release of methane from a volcanic basin
as a mechanism for initial Eocene global warming, Nature, 429, 542–545, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib171"><label>171</label><mixed-citation>
      
Svensen, H. H., Jones, M. T., Percival, L. M. E., Grasby, S. E., and Mather, T. A.: Release of mercury during contact metamorphism of shale: Implications for understanding the impacts of large igneous province volcanism, Earth  Planet. Sci. Lett., 619, 118306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118306" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118306</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib172"><label>172</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tomiyasu, T., Eguchi, T., Yamamoto, M., Anazawa, K., Sakamoto, H., Ando, T.,
Nedachi, M., and Marumo, K.: Influence of submarine fumaroles on the
distribution of mercury in the sediment of Kagoshima Bay, Japan, Mar.
Chem., 107, 173–183, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib173"><label>173</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tremblin, M., Khozyem, H., Adatte, T., Spangenberg, J.E., Fillon, C.,
Grauls, A., Hunger, T., Nowak, A., Läuchli, C., Lasseur, E., Roig,
J.-Y., Serrano, O., Calassou, S., Guillocheau, F., and Castelltort, S.:
Mercury enrichments of the Pyrenean foreland basins sediments support
enhanced volcanism during the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum (PETM),
Global   Planet. Change 212, 103794, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2022.103794" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2022.103794</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib174"><label>174</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trommer, G., Siccha, M., van der Meer, M. T. J., Schouten, S., Sinninghe
Damsté, J. S., Schulz, H., Hemleben, C., and Kucera, M.: Distribution of
Crenarchaeota tetraether membrane lipids in surface sediments from the Red
Sea, Org. Geochem., 40, 724–731, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib175"><label>175</label><mixed-citation>
      
van der Meulen, B., Gingerich, P. D., Lourens, L. J., Meijer, N., van
Broekhuizen, S., van Ginneken, S., and Abels, H. A.: Carbon isotope and
mammal recovery from extreme greenhouse warming at the Paleocene-Eocene
boundary in astronomically-calibrated fluvial strata, Bighorn Basin,
Wyoming, USA, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 534, 116044, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.116044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.116044</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib176"><label>176</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vickers, M. L., Lengger, S. K., Bernasconi, S. M., Thibault, N., Schultz, B. P.,
Fernandez, A., Ullmann, C. V., McCormack, P., Bjerrum, C. J., Rasmussen, J. A.,
Hougård, I. W., and Korte, C.: Cold spells in the Nordic Seas during the
early Eocene Greenhouse, Nat. Commun., 11, 4713, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18558-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18558-7</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib177"><label>177</label><mixed-citation>
      
Völkening, J., Walczyk, T., and Heumann, K. G.: Osmium isotope ratio
determinations by negative thermal ionization mass spectrometry,
Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 105, 147–159,
1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib178"><label>178</label><mixed-citation>
      
Walters, G. L., Kemp, S. J., Hemingway, J. D., Johnston, D. T., and Hodell,
D. A.: Clay hydroxyl isotopes show an enhanced hydrologic cycle during the
Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, Nat. Commun., 13, 7885, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35545-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35545-2</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib179"><label>179</label><mixed-citation>
      
Weijers, J. W. H., Schouten, S., Sluijs, A., Brinkhuis, H., and Sinninghe
Damsté, J. S.: Warm arctic continents during the Palaeocene-Eocene
thermal maximum, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 261, 230–238, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib180"><label>180</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wessel, P., Smith, W., Scharroo, R., Luis, J., and Wobbe, F.: Generic
Mapping Tools: Improved 1542 Version Released. Eos T. Am.
Geophys. Un., 94, 409–410, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib181"><label>181</label><mixed-citation>
      
West, C. K., Greenwood, D. R., and Basinger, J. F.: Was the Arctic Eocene
“rainforest” monsoonal? Estimates of seasonal precipitation from early
Eocene megafloras from Ellesmere Island, Nunavut, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 427, 18–30, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib182"><label>182</label><mixed-citation>
      
Westerhold, T., Röhl, U., McCarren, H. K., and Zachos, J. C.: Latest on
the absolute age of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM): New
insights from exact stratigraphic position of key ash layers +19 and −17,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 287, 412–419, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib183"><label>183</label><mixed-citation>
      
Westerhold, T., Röhl, U., Frederichs, T., Agnini, C., Raffi, I., Zachos, J. C., and Wilkens, R. H.: Astronomical calibration of the Ypresian timescale: implications for seafloor spreading rates and the chaotic behavior of the solar system?, Clim. Past, 13, 1129–1152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1129-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1129-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib184"><label>184</label><mixed-citation>
      
White, N.  and Lovell, B.: Measuring the pulse of a plume with the
sedimentary record, Nature, 387, 888–891, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib185"><label>185</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wieczorek, R., Fantle, M. S., Kump, L. R., and Ravizza, G.: Geochemical
evidence for volcanic activity prior to and enhanced terrestrial weathering
during the Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,
119, 391–410, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib186"><label>186</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wilkinson, C., Ganerød, M., Hendriks, B., and Eide, E.: Compilation and
appraisal of geochronological data from the North Atlantic Igneous Province
(NAIP), in:  The NE Atlantic
Region: A Reappraisal of Crustal Structure, Tectonostratigraphy and Magmatic
Evolution, edited by: Péron-Pinvidic, G., Hopper, J. R., Stoker, M. S., Gaina, C.,
Doornenbal, J. C., Funck, T., and Árting, U. E., Geological Society, London, Special Publications, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP447.10" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/SP447.10</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib187"><label>187</label><mixed-citation>
      
Willard, D. A., Donders, T. H., Reichgelt, T., Greenwood, D. R., Sangiorgi, F.,
Peterse, F., Nierop, K. G. J., Frieling, J., Schouten, S., and Sluijs, A.:
Arctic vegetation, temperature, and hydrology during Early Eocene transient
global warming events, Global   Planet. Change, 178, 139–152, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib188"><label>188</label><mixed-citation>
      
Willumsen, P. S.: Palynology of the Lower Eocene deposits of northwest
Jutland, Denmark, B. Geol. Soc. Denmark, 51, 141–157,
2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib189"><label>189</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yamashita, Y., Takahashi, Y., Haba, H., Enomoto, S., and Shimizu, H.:
Comparison of reductive accumulation of Re and Os in seawater–sediment
systems, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 71, 3458–3475, 2007.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib190"><label>190</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zachos, J., Dickens, G., and Zeebe, R.: An early Cenozoic perspective on
greenhouse warming and carbon-cycle dynamics, Nature, 451, 279–283, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib191"><label>191</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zacke, A., Voigt, S., Joachimski, M. M., Gale, A. S., Ward, D. J., and
Tütken, T.: Surface-water freshening and high-latitude river discharge
in the Eocene North Sea, J. Geol. Soc., 166, 969–980,
2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib192"><label>192</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zeebe, R. E.  and Lourens, L. J.: Solar System chaos and the Paleocene–Eocene
boundary age constrained by geology and astronomy, Science, 365, 926–929,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib193"><label>193</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zeebe, R. E., Zachos, J. C., and Dickens, G. R.: Carbon dioxide forcing alone
insufficient to explain Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum warming, Nat.
Geosci., 2, 576–580, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib194"><label>194</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y. G., Pagani, M., and Wang, Z.: Ring Index: A new strategy to
evaluate the integrity of TEX86 paleothermometry, Paleoceanography, 31,
220–232, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
