<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \hack{\hyphenation{consequent}}?><?xmltex \hack{\hyphenation{vegetation}}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">CP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Climate of the Past</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">CP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Clim. Past</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1814-9332</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/cp-18-313-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Effect of nitrogen limitation and soil biophysics on Holocene greening of the Sahara</article-title><alt-title>Effect of nitrogen limitation and soil biophysics on Holocene greening of the Sahara</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Effect of nitrogen limitation and soil biophysics on Holocene greening of the Sahara}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J. Lee et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>Jooyeop</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Claussen</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6225-5488</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Jeongwon</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3099-3563</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>Je-Woo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>In-Sun</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7211-6035</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>Jinkyu</given-names></name>
          <email>jhong@yonsei.ac.kr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0139-602X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Ecosystem–Atmosphere Process Laboratory, Department of Atmospheric
Sciences, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea (Republic of)</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN),
Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Korea Adaptation Center for Climate Change, Korea Environment
Institute, Sejong, Korea (Republic of)</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Mathematical Atmospheric Physics Lab, Department of Atmospheric
Sciences, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea (Republic of)</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jinkyu Hong (jhong@yonsei.ac.kr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>17</day><month>February</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>313</fpage><lpage>326</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>29</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>December</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day><month>December</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 Jooyeop Lee et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/18/313/2022/cp-18-313-2022.html">This article is available from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/18/313/2022/cp-18-313-2022.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/18/313/2022/cp-18-313-2022.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/18/313/2022/cp-18-313-2022.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e160">The so-called Green Sahara (GS), which was a wet and vegetative
Sahara region in the early to mid-Holocene, provides useful information on
our climate simulation because it is a consequence of complex interaction
between biophysical and climatic processes. It is still a challenge to
simulate the GS in terms of vegetative extent and precipitation using
current climate models. This study attempts to simulate the
Green Sahara 8000 years ago by using the state-of-the-art Earth system model CESM that
incorporates the nitrogen cycle and the soil–precipitation feedbacks. Our
study puts more emphasis on the impact of soil biophysical properties (e.g., bare-soil albedo, porosity, heat capacity, and hydraulic conductivity) and
soil nitrogen influenced by soil organic matter on the simulation of the GS.
In this coupled simulation, vegetation interacts with changes in soil
properties and soil organic matter by phenology, decomposition, and
allocation of carbon and nitrogen. With changes in the Earth's orbit and
dust in the early to mid-Holocene, the model simulates increased
precipitation in North Africa but does not capture the extent of the GS.
Our analysis shows that the Holocene greening is simulated better if the
amount of soil nitrogen and soil texture is properly modified for the humid and vegetative GS period. Soil biochemical and physical properties increase precipitation and vegetation cover in North Africa through their influence on photosynthesis and surface albedo as well as their consequent enhanced albedo–precipitation and evapotranspiration–precipitation feedbacks. Our findings suggest that future climate simulation needs to consider consequent changes in soil nitrogen and texture with changes in vegetation cover and density for proper climate simulations.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page314?><p id="d1e172">The Sahara is the largest subtropical desert on Earth, but it was wetter and had more vegetation than today during the early to mid-Holocene (EMH hereafter) (Holmes, 2008). In this Green Sahara (GS hereafter) period, the region was covered with various vegetation, inland rivers, and mega-lakes (Pachur and Kröpelin, 1987; Jolly et al., 1998; Schuster et al., 2005; Quade et al., 2018) up to 23<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N in North Africa, unlike the current vegetation,
which only exists in regions below 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. The GS was sensitive to
climate change with locally rapid transitions from a humid to a more arid
state some 8000 to 5000 years ago (Shanahan et al., 2015). The GS and its
transition to an arid state are the results of complex interactions of the
orbital forcing changes with the land–atmosphere interaction and sea
surface temperature (SST) variability (Claussen et al., 2017; Braconnot et
al., 2019). Future climate predictions are made using Earth system models
(ESMs), and recent progress in the development of ESMs have made it possible to
simulate and assess the carbon–climate feedbacks. GS is a good example
to evaluate various feedback processes in  state-of-the-art ESMs and
evaluate the model performance accordingly (Harrison et al., 2015; Pausata
et al., 2020). In this context, the GS period provides unique and useful
insights for our climate prediction in a changing climate.</p>
      <p id="d1e193">Many modeling studies have tried to simulate the GS and to understand the
underlying mechanisms of the GS correctly. Early studies focused on the
impacts of change in the Earth's orbit leading to higher summer solar
insolation compared to the present (Kutzbach, 1981; Kutzbach and
Street-Perrott, 1985). Further studies revealed that the following factors
contributed to the amplification of the GS: the ocean–climate feedback
(Kutzbach and Liu, 1997; Braconnot et al., 1999), vegetation–climate
feedback (Claussen, 1998; Claussen et al., 1999, 2013; Rachmayani et al., 2015; Groner et al., 2018), soil–climate feedback (Kutzbach et al., 1996; Knorr et al., 2001; Levis et al., 2004; Knorr et
al., 2006; Vamborg et al., 2011; Lu et al., 2018), inland water (Coe and
Bonan, 1997; Krinner et al., 2012), and dust–climate feedback (Pausata et
al., 2016; Gaetani et al., 2017). However, current state-of-the-art
climate models still yield diverging results regarding the extent of the GS
and the understanding of feedback processes (Claussen et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e196">Recently, ESMs have begun to couple nitrogen (N hereafter) processes to the carbon
cycle. The global carbon budget has been simulated more realistically with
the recent inclusion of the nitrogen cycle in  ESMs because of the
N-limitation effect of terrestrial gross primary production (GPP) (Thornton
et al., 2007; Castillo et al., 2012; Arora et al., 2020). However, the impact of
nitrogen limitation on the GS simulation has not been extensively
investigated as far as we know. It is also notable that soil in the GS
includes more organic matter and humus compared to the current condition
because vegetation leads to more organic matter in soils, thus affecting
hydraulic, thermal, and radiative properties of soil (e.g., Kutzbach et al., 1996; Levis et al., 2004; Lu et al., 2018). Lu et al. (2018) concluded that
organic matter in soil texture likely played an important role in the GS
dynamics, but their study was based on the offline land surface model only
with changes in soil hydraulic and thermal properties, and more studies need
to be done to investigate impacts of the biophysical and biogeochemical
changes in soil on the GS greening in the framework of  fully coupled
ESMs.</p>
      <p id="d1e199">The present study focuses on better understanding  ESM simulation
ability to simulate vegetation in the GS and its uncertainties by the
representation of physical processes in the land surface model. We
investigate the impacts of nitrogen limitation and soil biophysical
processes on the GS simulations using the Community Earth System Model
(CESM, version 1.2) (Hurrell et al., 2013). Based on a series of  model
simulations, we examine changes in the GS extension and its associated
uncertainties by related factors of orbital forcing, nitrogen and carbon in
soil, and soil texture.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Model description</title>
      <p id="d1e217">The Community Earth System Model (CESM, version 1.2) with the Community
Atmosphere Model version 4 (CAM4; Neale et al., 2013) and Community Land
Model version 4 (CLM4; Oleson et al., 2010; Lawrence et al., 2011) is
employed in this study. The CESM incorporates prognostic carbon–nitrogen
(CN) equations and the dynamic vegetation model into the land surface model.
The model simulates carbon dynamics such as productivity, phenology,
decomposition, and allocation with carbon and nitrogen fluxes at the
ecosystem–atmosphere interface by the CN prognostic equations. This new CN
parameterization makes a substantial difference in vegetation simulation by
limiting gross primary production (GPP) with soil mineral nitrogen in the
climate simulations particularly (Thornton et al., 2007; Castillo et al., 2012; Arora et al., 2020).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M3" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GPP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GPP</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">excess</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GPP</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          GPP becomes the potential GPP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GPP</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) if there is no nitrogen limitation, and nitrogen limitation is linked to soil organic matter in the model. Nitrogen limitation on GPP is expressed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">excess</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is decided by soil mineral nitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sminn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sminn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a function of the conversion rate of soil organic nitrogen to mineral nitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sminn</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and is affected by the amount of soil carbon (soil4c) eventually (Eqs. 2–9). It was reported that GPP in CESM version 1 was smaller than other CMIP6 models because of the larger nitrogen limitation effect. More details on the CN parameterization in the CLM can be found in Thornton et al. (2002, 2009) and Kluzek (2012). The description of the variables used in this study including those in Eq. (1) are listed in Appendix A.

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M9" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">excess</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">avail</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">alloc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">alloc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">avail</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">alloc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GPP</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MR</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">alloc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">plant</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">demand</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">retrans</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">alloc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">alloc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">uptake</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">plant</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">demand</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">plant</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">demand</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">avail</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">alloc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">alloc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">alloc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">retrans</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>7</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">uptake</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sminn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">immob</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>8</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sminn</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sminn</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sminn</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mtext>dt</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>9</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sminn</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>soil4c</mml:mtext><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">decomp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>dt</mml:mtext><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e662">The albedo–precipitation feedback has also been considered to be one of the
important aspects in the land–atmosphere interaction and should be clearly
examined in<?pagebreak page315?> the GS simulation (e.g., Charney, 1975; Cess, 1978; Bonfils et
al., 2001; Houldcroft et al., 2009; Levine and Boos, 2017). Precipitation
increases if surface albedo decreases because of more vegetation through the
stratification of the atmosphere, particularly in drylands. However, in the
CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5) EMH simulations, soil
moisture is irrelevant to surface albedo in most land surface models (LSMs)
(e.g., Takata et al., 2003; Zeng, 2005; Houldcroft et al., 2009; Oleson et
al., 2010; Watanabe et al., 2010; Vamborg et al., 2011). This study uses CLM4
for simulation of land surface processes. In the CLM4, surface albedo is
parameterized as a function of soil moisture in the calculation of soil
background albedo. In this parameterization, soil background albedo
decreases with increases in soil moisture of the first soil layer as
follows.

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M10" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>10</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E11"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>11</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable rowspacing="4.267913pt" class="array" columnalign="center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.275</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.275</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            In addition, the soil texture distribution is classified by sand and clay
percentage, and soil has 20 color classes from the low to  high albedo. In
the lowest albedo (darkest soil), dry (saturated) albedo is 0.08 (0.04) and
0.16 (0.08) in the visible and  near-infrared (NIR) range, respectively. In the highest albedo
(lightest soil), the dry (saturated) albedo is 0.36 (0.25) and 0.61 (0.50)
in the visible and NIR range, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
equal to the albedo of the saturated soil.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Experimental design</title>
      <p id="d1e767">For our CESM simulations of the GS, the horizontal resolution is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in global scale with 26 vertical levels. The initial land surface data are made using CLM4 offline simulations for 600 years in the CN-accelerated decomposition mode (Thornton
and Rosenbloom, 2005), and then using 1200-year CLM4 simulations with
CNDV (carbon–nitrogen–dynamic–vegetation) and atmospheric forcing
data for the years 1948–1972  based on Qian et al. (2006). The present (i.e., 0K)
and EMH (i.e., 8K) simulations are 500-year climate simulations using the
pre-industrial and EMH conditions, respectively (Table 1). The EMH period
is set to 8000 years ago (8K) in this study because the 8K period was relatively
greener than other periods (Jolly et al., 1998; Groner et al., 2018).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e793">The abbreviations of the numerical experiments conducted in this
study.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Abbreviation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Description</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">500-year simulation using the pre-industrial conditions for orbital parameters and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (284.725 ppm)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">500-year simulation using the orbital parameters and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at 8000 years ago (Table 2)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8KCN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Same as 8K except that soil carbon and nitrogen are prescribed as the values in the current Sahel region</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8KCN0L</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Same as 8KCN except that the Lake Mega-Chad is not considered in the simulation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8KCNh</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Same as 8KCN except that soil carbon and nitrogen are prescribed as half of the 8KCN simulation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8KCNS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Same as 8KCN except that the North African soil was prescribed as loam</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e893">Additional sensitivity experiments using the EMH conditions are conducted
with different land states to examine the impacts of soil nitrogen, soil
texture, and the mega-lake on the GS simulation (Table 1). Soil carbon and
nitrogen are negligible in the current Sahara. To the best of our knowledge,
there is no information on soil organic carbon and nitrogen in North Africa
during the EMH. It is reasonable to consider more soil carbon and nitrogen
in the GS than in the present-day Sahara because of their close coupling
with biomass (Brooks, 2003; Wang et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2014). To
consider the possibility of relatively larger soil carbon and nitrogen in
the GS, more soil carbon and nitrogen are added with less sandy soil (i.e.,
loamier soil with more soil organic matter) in the 8KCN and 8KCNS
experiments based on Jolly et al. (1998) to prescribe soil organic matter in
the GS (i.e., 10–22<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 345<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W–40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) using
nearby grassland grid values (Fig. 1). In these sensitivity experiments, the
feedbacks between vegetation and increased soil carbon and nitrogen evolve
dynamically in the model through litterfall and decomposition processes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e926">Global maps of soil carbon <bold>(a, b)</bold> and nitrogen <bold>(c, d)</bold> used in the 0K and 8KCN simulations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/18/313/2022/cp-18-313-2022-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e941">In all EMH simulations, the Earth's orbital parameters and atmospheric
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration are prescribed based on Berger (1978) with
pre-industrial SST (Table 2), and atmospheric dust is reduced following
Pausata et al. (2016) (Fig. 2). In addition,  Lake Mega-Chad is
considered in our EMH simulations by assigning 73 % of the two grids near
the Lake Chad region (14–18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) as lake area to
consider the extensive Lake Chad in the EMH (Leblanc et al., 2006; Quade et
al., 2018). Our analysis focuses on three critical regions in North Africa
around the border of the vegetation in our simulation:  North Africa at
20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (solid boxed area in Fig. 3, NA hereafter) and the
Sahara–Sahel (SS hereafter) region. These regions are selected as the
analysis region because the NA region is closely related to the onset and
progress of the African monsoon (Levis et al., 2004) and the SS region was
sensitive to precipitation–land interaction (Kutzbach et al., 1996). The
Sahara–Sahel region is divided into the northern Sahara–Sahel region
(dotted box area in Fig. 3, NSS hereafter) and southern Sahara–Sahel region
(dashed box area in Fig. 3, SSS hereafter) with a common latitudinal band
around 18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N  in this study. The NSS is the boundary region
of vegetation in the EMH, and the SSS shows substantial increases in
precipitation with changes in the orbital forcings (more information in the
next section). These two regions share the 18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N latitude band for
considering the common properties between two regions and the model
resolution.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1002">Orbital parameters prescribed for the simulations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Simulation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Eccentricity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Obliquity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Longitude of perihelion</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">284.725 ppm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.016704</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">283.01<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8K, 8KCN, 8KCN0L, 8KCNh, 8KCNS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">259.9 ppm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.019101</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.209</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">148.58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1108">Dust reduction fraction <bold>(a)</bold> below 150 hPa and <bold>(b)</bold> above 150 hPa in the 8K experiments compared to the present-day values.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/18/313/2022/cp-18-313-2022-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Climate and vegetation simulation in the Green Sahara</title>
      <p id="d1e1139">The 8K simulation shows typical climate patterns in the Sahara–Sahel region
during the EMH, and there are substantial differences of surface climates
between the 0K and 8K experiments in North Africa (Fig. 3). The summer
downward radiation at the top of the atmosphere increases by 6 % in the SS region compared to the present because of the change in the orbital forcing and lower amount of dust in the EMH. This increase in solar radiation leads to an increase in surface shortwave radiation and net radiation by 30 and 21 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, as well as subsequent temperature warming by
1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the NA region in the 8K experiment (Fig. 3). The
intensified land–sea thermal contrast during the EMH<?pagebreak page316?> makes spatial changes
in precipitation and wind patterns over Holocene North Africa compared to the
present climate. Notably, the increases in air temperature and shortwave
radiation are not substantial in the SS region (less than 10 % compared to
the NA region) because of the increase in precipitation and clouds with the
northward migration of the monsoon by the intensified land–sea thermal
contrast (Fig. 3d). Indeed, the meridional wind in the 18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N
region changed from northerly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) to southerly (0.3 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
in the 8K experiment (Fig. 3g, h), indicating a northward shift of the
Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) (i.e., the convergence zone of the
trade winds) to above 18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. This ITCZ shift caused a favorable
condition for a moister Sahara by transporting more moisture and subsequently
more precipitation to the SS region (Chikira et al., 2006; Larrasoaña et
al., 2013). Compared to the pre-industrial simulation (i.e., 0K), summer
precipitation in the EMH simulation (i.e., 8K) increases by 18 % (from 4.0 to 4.7 mm d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 15 % (from 2.5 to 2.9 mm d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the SSS
and NSS region, respectively (Fig. 3e, f).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1242">Differences of climate conditions between the 8K and 0K experiment
(8K–0K) in summer (June, July, August, and September; JJAS). Differences in
downward shortwave radiation <bold>(a)</bold>, surface net shortwave radiation <bold>(b)</bold>, 2 m air temperature <bold>(c)</bold>, and cloud fraction <bold>(d)</bold>. <bold>(e, f)</bold> JJAS precipitation in the 0K and its differences from the 8K experiment. <bold>(g, h)</bold> JJAS surface wind vector of the 0K and 8K experiment, respectively. Black squared boxes are the NA (solid), NSS (dotted), and SSS (dashed) areas.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/18/313/2022/cp-18-313-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1270">The pre-industrial simulation captures the observed spatial extent of the
current Sahara based on MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging
Spectroradiometer) land surface data (Fig. 4a) (Broxton et al., 2014).
Importantly, the model does not simulate an increased vegetation fraction,
despite the increased precipitation over the SS region during the EMH (Fig. 4b). Reconstruction of vegetation based on the pollen records reveals that
grass and trees expanded up to 26 and 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N over
North Africa during the GS period, respectively (Hély et al., 2014; Hopcroft
et al., 2017). Also, leaf wax data indicate that the GS extended as
far north as 31<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (Tierney et al., 2017). In contrast to
the proxy data, vegetation fraction and GPP show negligible changes in
North Africa and even a decrease in western Africa and the southern border
of the current Sahara in the 8K simulation (Fig. 4b, e). It is notable that
Lake Mega-Chad did not make substantial changes in simulated summer
precipitation northward movement of the 200 and 412 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
precipitation isohyet for 20 % grassland cover, which is similar to
Contoux et al. (2013) (Figs. S1, S2 in the Supplement).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1306">Vegetation fraction (percentage per grid, <bold>a, b, c</bold>), summertime GPP (gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per month, <bold>d, e, f</bold>), and dominant land cover <bold>(g, h, i)</bold>. Panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold> and panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold> are differences between 8K and
0K and between 8KCN and 8K, respectively. Dominant land cover is decided as
bare soil if the vegetation cover fraction is less than 20 %.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/18/313/2022/cp-18-313-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page317?><p id="d1e1349">Hopcroft et al. (2017) attributed such underestimation of the GS to an
excessive precipitation requirement for vegetation growth in the model
(Table 3). Our investigation also shows that the minimum amount of
precipitation for vegetation growth is 577 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 8K
experiment, and this precipitation threshold is larger than the observation
value of 281 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Hopcroft et al., 2017). This larger threshold
indicates that our model has relatively little vegetation cover with respect
to the same amount of precipitation and is not fully understood yet in the
ESM (Hopcroft et al., 2017). Our investigation reveals that this excess
water requirement by vegetation growth becomes smaller with improved water
use efficiency (WUE) and proper assignment of soil organic matter and soil
texture, which is discussed in the next section.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1379">The 20 % vegetation coverage transition rainfall for OBS (observation
data) and four model simulations (the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator
version 4.1, Lund–Potsdam–Jena dynamic vegetation model version 2.1,
Sheffield Dynamic Global Vegetation Model, and CLM4 for this study). OBS,
JULES, LPJ, and SDGVM indicate the value from the observation and model
simulation in the pre-industrial conditions, which is from Hopcroft et al. (2017).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20 % vegetation coverage transition rainfall</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SDGVM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">182</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OBS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">281</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">JULES</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">378</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LPJ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">515</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">This study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">570 (0K)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">577 (8K)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">412 (8KCN)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Impact of soil nitrogen on the Green Sahara simulation</title>
      <p id="d1e1496">The 8KCN experiment is designed to study the effect of an increase in soil
nitrogen by vegetation on the GS and simulates typical surface climate
patterns during the EMH (not shown here). Importantly, the 8KCN simulation
reproduces larger precipitation and vegetative areas with an increase in GPP
in the SS region compared to the 8K experiment (Fig. 4). Vegetation
fraction increases by about double in the SS region (21 % and 8 % in the
SSS and NSS regions, respectively) in the 8KCN experiment (Table 4). The
8KCN experiment also shows a 2 times larger vegetation fraction than the 8K
experiment around the boundary of precipitation changes between the present
and EMH (about 18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N). Particularly, the 8KCN experiment shows 3.3
and 5.3 times larger GPP in the NSS and SSS regions, respectively, compared
to the 8K experiment (Table 5). Consequently, the precipitation threshold
for vegetation decreases to 412 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 8KCN from 577 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 8K experiment together with increased WUE values (Figs. 5 and 6). With this increase in vegetation fraction, the desert–grassland boundary moves one grid box northward in the 8KCN simulation compared to the 8K experiment (Fig. 4i).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1535">Vegetation fraction (%) and GPP (gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per month) in the SS
region. Values in parenthesis are percentage changes in vegetation
fraction and GPP to the 8K simulation.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8KCN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8KCNS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vegetation fraction (percentage change in vegetation fraction to the 8K simulation)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.3 (0 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.0 (81 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20.9 (152 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GPP (percentage change in GPP to the 8K simulation)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.0 (20 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.3 (312 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.6 (404 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1628">GPP (gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per month) from five CMIP5 models (IPSL-CM5A-LR,
MIROC-ESM, bcc-csm1-1, MPI-ESM-P, CCSM4) for 6K simulations and this study
in the NSS region (18–22<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) during the pre-industrial period (PI)
and early to mid-Holocene (EMH).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PI GPP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">EMH GPP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IPSL-CM5A-LR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIROC-ESM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.69</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CCSM4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">bcc-csm1-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.65</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MPI-ESM-P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">This study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.12 (0K)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.27 (8K)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.79 (8KCN)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.82 (8KCNS)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1777">WUE (water use efficiency, gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the
growing season in the 8K <bold>(a)</bold> and 8KCN <bold>(b)</bold> simulations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/18/313/2022/cp-18-313-2022-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1818">Annual precipitation in North Africa from <bold>(a)</bold> the 8K and <bold>(b)</bold> 8KCN simulations. The minimum amount of precipitation for the vegetation growth boundary is plotted as a black line with its values.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/18/313/2022/cp-18-313-2022-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page319?><p id="d1e1833">Our analysis shows that this increased vegetation in the 8KCN results from
moderated nitrogen limitation on photosynthetic carbon uptake (Eq. 1 and
Fig. 7). The nitrogen downregulation fraction defined by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GPP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GPP</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is about 0.5 and 0.3 in the NSS and SSS regions, respectively, in the 8K experiment but decreases by about 0.1 in the 8KCN experiment. Our further simulation indicates that vegetation fraction and vegetation types depend on the amount of soil nitrogen (Fig. S3). The increases in vegetation fraction and tree cover fraction are approximately proportional to the amount of soil nitrogen. The vegetation fraction increase is substantially smaller in the 8KCNh (i.e., half nitrogen simulation of the 8KCN) compared to the 8KCN (Fig. S3). Trees in the 8KCN are also substantially replaced by grass and shrub in the simulation with less soil nitrogen (8KCNh).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1853">Downregulation fraction (GPP divided by GPP not limited by
nitrogen) in the <bold>(a)</bold> 8K and <bold>(b)</bold> 8KCN simulations. Downregulation fraction difference between the 8KCN and 8K simulation <bold>(c)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/18/313/2022/cp-18-313-2022-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1871">We speculate that albedo–precipitation feedback is reinforced with more
vegetation in the 8KCN experiment. In the 8K experiment, the surface albedo
decreases compared to the 0K experiment, mainly because of the increase in
soil moisture by the enhanced precipitation. In the 8KCN simulation, the
surface albedo diminishes more because the vegetation increases more, and
the surface albedo decreases with increasing vegetation cover. Our further
analysis suggests that such feedback reinforcement makes an additional 0.1 mm d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> precipitation and expansion of vegetation, especially in the SSS region (Fig. 8a and b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e1889">Differences in volumetric soil water content <bold>(a, c)</bold> and surface albedo <bold>(b, d)</bold> between the 0K, 8K, and 8KCN experiments. The first and second rows show the differences between the 8K and 0K and between the 8KCN and 8K experiments, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/18/313/2022/cp-18-313-2022-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page320?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Impact of soil texture on the Green Sahara simulation</title>
      <p id="d1e1912">Soil is classified as sandy soil for the present-day Sahara in the 8K and
8KCN simulations like previous studies on the GS (e.g., Hopcroft et al., 2017; Groner et al., 2018). It is, however, plausible that soil in the GS includes more nutrients and humus than sandy soil (i.e., loamier) with the
extensive vegetation in this humid region because soil organic matter is
formed by decomposition of litter and woody debris (Levis et al., 2004;
Koven et al., 2013). Such soil type changes make impacts on soil color as
well as soil hydraulic and thermal properties. Compared to sandy soil, loamy
soil has larger soil porosity and heat capacity but smaller saturated
hydraulic conductivity because it contains more slit and clay than sandy
soils. Consequently, loamy soils have larger water-holding (i.e., soil
porosity) and heat capacities (Kutzbach et al., 1996; Levis et al., 2004).
A previous study based on the offline dynamic vegetation simulation of the GS
shows that the simulated greening of the Sahara is sensitive to changes in
soil thermal and hydraulic properties without bare-soil albedo changes (Lu
et al., 2018).</p>
      <?pagebreak page321?><p id="d1e1915">Our coupled ESM simulation of 8KCNS also shows that soil texture leads to
significant changes in vegetation and climate in North Africa. Vegetation
cover fraction shows a 78 % increase over the SS region when the soil
nitrogen and soil texture are modified all together (i.e., 8KCNS
experiment) compared to the 8KCN experiment (Fig. 9e; Table 4). Notably,
those feedback processes are critical in the western SSS, which is coincident
with the region classified as sandy soil in the ESMs (Fig. 9f–l).
A vegetation fraction increase is clearly observed, especially in the western
SSS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) in the 8KCNS experiment, with a 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N northward movement (15 to 17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) of the 20 % vegetation coverage border and its related GPP increases. This result
suggests that the western SSS is a hot spot from the perspective of soil texture
in the EMH simulations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e1956">Differences of the loamy soil experiment (8KCNS) from 8KCN. <bold>(a)</bold> Volumetric soil water content, <bold>(b)</bold> surface albedo, <bold>(c)</bold> net shortwave radiation, <bold>(d)</bold> Bowen ratio, <bold>(e)</bold> precipitation, <bold>(f)</bold> sand fraction in the grid used in 8K and 8KCN, <bold>(g)</bold> vegetation fraction, <bold>(h)</bold> GPP, and <bold>(i)</bold> dominant land cover in the 8KCNS experiment. Only grids that are significantly different at 95 % in a Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test are colored in <bold>(e)</bold>. Soil type is decided as the relative percentages of sand, silt, and clay in soil, and soil physical parameters are assigned based on this soil type in the CLM (Fig. 8f; Bonan et al., 2002).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/18/313/2022/cp-18-313-2022-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2004">Our analysis indicates that such substantial sensitivity is mainly related to
changes in soil hydraulic and thermal properties, but the darker soil color
of loamy soils also regulates climate and vegetation in the study region.
The relatively darker soil color of loamy soils in the 8KCNS experiment leads to
smaller surface albedo, and its increase in reinforced by increases in
summertime precipitation (see Eq. 9; Fig. 9a–b). That is, the darker
soils enhance absorption of solar radiation (i.e., increase in surface net
radiation) and more available energy is partitioned into latent heat fluxes
(i.e., smaller Bowen ratio), leading to more precipitation in North Africa
(Fig. 9c–e), possibly through the albedo–precipitation feedback and its
related moisture recycling (Hopcroft et al., 2017; Levine and Boos, 2017;
Groner et al., 2018). Also, previous studies indicate that enhanced
evapotranspiration results in more rainfall by a weakened African easterly jet
(AEJ) (Cook, 1999; Wu et al., 2009; Rachmayani et al., 2015). Our simulation
also reveals that the AEJ is weakened with more evaporation and summertime
rainfall, which is not found in the 8KCN experiment.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Summary and conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e2017">The Green Sahara indicates an extensive vegetative area and humid climate in the Sahara–Sahel region in the early to mid-Holocene. Previous studies report that the GS is a consequence of complex interactions between various climatic and biophysical factors. It is also known that land–atmosphere interaction enhances vegetation in the GS period with impacts of SST and orbital forcing change (e.g., Claussen et al., 2013; Groner et al., 2018).
This study aims at examining the effect of soil nitrogen and soil physical
properties on simulations of the Green Sahara 8000 years ago using a
state-of-the-art ESM that incorporates soil nitrogen and albedo–soil
moisture feedback processes. As far as we know, this is the first<?pagebreak page322?> study to
investigate impacts of soil nitrogen and soil texture on the GS simulation
using a coupled ESM.</p>
      <p id="d1e2020">Our ESM simulation results clearly show that vegetation in the GS is
dramatically sensitive to soil organic carbon and soil texture in North
Africa (Table 5). With the changes in the Earth's orbit and dust in the EMH,
the model simulates the northward movement of the tropical rainfall belt and
its related precipitation increases in North Africa with the EMH conditions
and present-day soil nitrogen and soil carbon. However, despite  more
precipitation, the meridional extent of vegetation in the Sahara–Sahel
transition zone only marginally differs between the early to mid-Holocene
and present-day simulation, which did not simulate greening in the early to
mid-Holocene properly. This inconsistent modeling behavior between
precipitation and vegetation cover can be attributed to the unrealistically
high threshold of precipitation required for desert–grassland transition
and low WUE in the terrestrial ecosystem model. Our analysis shows that this
excessive rainfall needed for vegetation is lowered if enhanced soil nitrogen
and loamier soil are considered in the model based on the extensive
vegetation during the GS. This change in the vegetation threshold leads to
increases in GPP and vegetation cover eventually. Particularly, the SS
region is sensitive to soil nitrogen and clay as well as silt composition in soil
(i.e., loamier) in our simulations. Our results suggest that soil property
is as important as nitrogen fertilization in simulating precipitation,
vegetation dynamics, and atmospheric circulation in North Africa during the
EMH.</p>
      <p id="d1e2023">It is also found that the increase in vegetation cover is reinforced by more
precipitation in this soil–nitrogen-enhanced simulation through the
feedback in soil albedo, water-holding capacity, soil color, and
precipitation processes. Our sensitivity simulations show that loamy soil
having more soil organic matter also leads to more precipitation and
vegetation in Holocene North Africa through albedo–precipitation and
evapotranspiration–precipitation feedbacks with changes in soil color, soil
nitrogen, and soil physical properties. Our results indicate that soil
nitrogen through downregulation of GPP and process-based dynamics of soil
properties with vegetation are critical for Green Sahara simulations in
ESMs. In particular, GPP and vegetation cover show dramatic increases
of 400 % and 150 % in the SS<?pagebreak page323?> region, respectively, with changes in soil
organic matter and soil texture. Our findings and their implications can be
extended to future climate and dynamic vegetation simulations. More
future study should be done on the role of soil biogeochemical processes in
the vegetation dynamics in climate simulations, particularly if we use an
ESM to incorporate carbon and nitrogen cycles into the model. Despite our
important findings on impacts of soil properties on the GS simulation,
further study on the vegetation–soil interactions and its related
unparameterized processes such as soil migration is necessary because our
modeling studies still have unsatisfactory representation of vegetation
cover and WUE notwithstanding ample precipitation in North Africa.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title>List of symbols and definitions</title>
      <p id="d1e2037"><table-wrap id="Taba" position="anchor"><oasis:table><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>Symbols</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>Definitions</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">alloc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">amount of carbon allocated to new growth (gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">avail</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">allloc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">amount of total carbon available for new growth allocation (gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">excess</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">amount of carbon that plants could additionally allocate if nitrogen were not limiting (gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">dt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">decomposition time step (seconds)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">fraction of potential growth that can be achieved with the nitrogen available to plants (no units)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GPP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">gross primary production when there is no nitrogen limitation (gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">alloc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">alloc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carbon</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nitrogen</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stoichiometry constant for new growth allocation (gC (gN)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">maintenance respiration (gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">plant</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ndemand</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">nitrogen demand by plant for photosynthesis (gN m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">retrans</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">retranslocated nitrogen pool (gN m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>); nitrogen retranslocation is the amount of nitrogen that</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">is removed from the tissues and is stored in the other part of the plant to reuse it in the next growth</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sminn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">the amount of mineral nitrogen in the total soil column (gN m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">uptake</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">amount of plant uptake from soil mineral nitrogen pool (gN m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">immob</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">amount of immobilized nitrogen flux (gN m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sminn</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">nitrogen fluxes leaving soil nitrogen pool with largest turnover time to soil mineral</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">nitrogen (gN m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">soil4c</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">soil carbon pool with largest turnover time (gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">decomp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">decomposition rate constant of the soil organic matter (no unit)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">soil background albedo for saturated soil (fraction)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">soil background albedo (fraction)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">variable that depends on the volumetric water content of the first soil layer</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">the volumetric soil water content of the first soil layer (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap></p><?xmltex \hack{~\\[2mm]}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2758">All data are available on Zenodo (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5788013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.5788013</ext-link>, Lee and Hong, 2021) and upon request to the corresponding author (jhong@yonsei.ac.kr, <uri>https://eapl.yonsei.ac.kr</uri>, last access: 20 February 2021).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e2767">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-313-2022-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-313-2022-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><?xmltex \hack{~\\[165mm]}?><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2778">JL and JH contributed to the numerical experimental design, model simulation, data analysis, and paper preparation. MC, JK, and JWH contributed to data interpretation and paper preparation. All authors contributed to the scientific discussion.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2784">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Climate of the Past</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e2793">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2799">Our thanks go to the editor and reviewers for their constructive comments to improve our study.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2804">This research has been supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (grant no. NRF-2018R1A5A1024958).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2811">This paper was edited by Qiuzhen Yin and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arora, V. K., Katavouta, A., Williams, R. G., Jones, C. D., Brovkin, V., Friedlingstein, P., Schwinger, J., Bopp, L., Boucher, O., Cadule, P., Chamberlain, M. A., Christian, J. R., Delire, C., Fisher, R. A., Hajima, T., Ilyina, T., Joetzjer, E., Kawamiya, M., Koven, C. D., Krasting, J. P., Law, R. M., Lawrence, D. M., Lenton, A., Lindsay, K., Pongratz, J., Raddatz, T., Séférian, R., Tachiiri, K., Tjiputra, J. F., Wiltshire, A., Wu, T., and Ziehn, T.: Carbon–concentration and carbon–climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models, Biogeosciences, 17, 4173–4222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4173-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-17-4173-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Berger, A. L.: Long-Term Variations of Caloric Insolation Resulting from the
Earth's Orbital Elements 1, Quaternary Res., 9, 139–167, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bonfils, C., de Noblet-Ducoudre, N., Braconnot, P., and Joussaume, S.: Hot
desert albedo and climate change: Mid-Holocene monsoon in North Africa, J.
Climate, 17, 3724–3737, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Braconnot, P., Joussaume, S., Marti, O., and de Noblet, N.: Synergistic
Feedbacks from Ocean and Vegetation on the African Monsoon Response to
Mid-Holocene Insolation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2481–2484, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Braconnot, P., Zhu, D., Marti, O., and Servonnat, J.: Strengths and challenges for transient Mid- to Late Holocene simulations with dynamical vegetation, Clim. Past, 15, 997–1024, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-997-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-15-997-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Brooks, M. L.: Effects of increased soil nitrogen on the dominance of alien
annual plants in the Mojave Desert, J. Appl. Ecol., 40, 344–353, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Broxton, P. D., Zeng, X., Sulla-Menashe, D., and Troch, P. A.: A global land
cover climatology using MODIS data, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 53, 1593–1605, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0270.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0270.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Castillo, C. K. G., Levis, S., and Thornton, P. E.: Evaluation of the New
CNDV Option of the Community Land Model: Effects of Dynamic Vegetation and
Interactive Nitrogen on CLM4 Means and Variability, J. Climate, 25,
3702–3714, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00372.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00372.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cess, R. D.: Biosphere-Albedo Feedback and Climate Modeling, J. Atmos. Sci.,
35, 1765–1768, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Charney, J. G.: Dynamics of Deserts and Drought in Sahel, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 101, 193–202, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chikira, M., Abe-Ouchi, A., and Sumi, A.: General circulation model study on
the green Sahara during the mid-Holocene: an
impact of convection originating above boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.,
111, D21103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006398" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006398</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Claussen, M.: On multiple solutions of the atmosphere-vegetation system in
present-day climate, Glob. Change Biol., 4, 549–559, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Claussen, M., Kubatzki, C., Brovkin, V., Ganoposki, A., Hoelzmann, P., and
Pachur, H. J.: Simulation of an abrupt change in Saharan vegetation in the
mid-Holocene, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2037–2040, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Claussen, M., Bathiany, S., Brovkin, V., and Kleinen, T.: Simulated
climate-vegetation interaction in semi-arid regions affected by plant
diversity, Nat. Geosci., 6, 954–958, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Claussen, M., Dallmeyer, A., and Bader, J.: Theory and modeling of the
African humid period and the green Sahara, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of
Climate Science, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.532" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.532</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Coe, M. and Bonan, G.: Feedbacks between climate and surface water in
northern Africa during the middle Holocene, J. Geophys. Res., 102,
11087–11101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00343" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD00343</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Contoux, C., Jost, A., Ramstein, G., Sepulchre, P., Krinner, G., and Schuster, M.: Megalake Chad impact on climate and vegetation during the late Pliocene and the mid-Holocene, Clim. Past, 9, 1417–1430, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-1417-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-9-1417-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cook, K. H.: Generation of the African Easterly Jet and its role in determining West African precipitation, J. Climate, 12, 1165–1184, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gaetani, M., Messori, G., Zhang, Q., Flamant, C., and Pausata, F. S. R.:
Understanding the Mechanisms behind the Northward Extension of the West
African Monsoon during the Mid-Holocene, J. Climate, 30, 7621–7642,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0299.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0299.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Groner, V. P., Raddatz, T., Reick, C. H., and Claussen, M.: Plant functional diversity affects climate–vegetation interaction, Biogeosciences, 15, 1947–1968, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1947-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-1947-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Harrison, S. P., Bartlein, P. J., Izumi, K., Li, G., Annan, J., Hargreaves,
J., Braconnot, P. B., and Kageyama, M.: Implications of evaluation of CMIP5
palaeosimulations for climate projections, Nat. Clim. Change, 5, 735–743, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2649" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2649</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hély, C., Lézine, A.-M., and contributors, A.: Holocene changes in African vegetation: tradeoff between climate and water availability, Clim. Past, 10, 681–686, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-681-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-10-681-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Holmes, J. A.: How the Sahara became dry, Science, 320, 752–753, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hopcroft, P. O., Valdes, P. J., Harper, A. B., and Beerling, D. J.: Multi
vegetation model evaluation of the Green Sahara climate regime, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 44, 6804–6813, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Houldcroft, C., Grey, W., Barnsley, M., Taylor, C., Los, S., and North, P.:
New Vegetation Albedo Parameters and Global Fields of Soil Background Albedo
Derived from MODIS for Use in a Climate Model, J. Hydrometeorol., 10,
183–198, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page325?><ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hurrell, J. W., Holland, M. M., Gent, P. R., Ghan, S., Kay, J. E., Kushner,
P., Lamarque, J.-F., Large, W. G., Lawrence, D., Lindsay, K., Lipscomb, W.
H., Long, M. C., Mahowald, N., Marsh, D. R., Neale, R. B., Rasch, P.,
Vavrus, S., Vertenstein, M., Bader, D., Collins, W. D., Hack, J. J., Kiehl,
J., and Marshall, S.: The Community Earth System Model: a framework for
collaborative research, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1339–1360, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jolly, D., Harrison, S. P., Damnati, B., and Bonnefille, R.: Simulated
climate and biomes of Africa during the Late Quaternary: comparisons with
pollen and lake status data, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 17, 629–657, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kluzek, E.: CESM research tools: CLM4 in CESM1.0.4, User's guide
documentation, National Centers for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, USA, <uri>https://svn-ccsm-models.cgd.ucar.edu/clm2/branch_tags/cesm1_0_4_rel_tags/cesm1_0_4_n05_clm4_0_32/models/lnd/clm/doc/UsersGuide/clm_ug.xml</uri> (last access: 2 February 2022), 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Knorr, W. and Schnitzler, K. G.: Enhanced albedo feedback in North Africa
from possible combined vegetation and soil formation processes, Clim.
Dynam., 26, 55–63, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Knorr, W., Schnitzler, K. G., and Govaerts, Y.: The role of bright desert
regions in shaping North African climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28,
3489–3492, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Koven, C. D., Riley, W. J., Subin, Z. M., Tang, J. Y., Torn, M. S., Collins, W. D., Bonan, G. B., Lawrence, D. M., and Swenson, S. C.: The effect of vertically resolved soil biogeochemistry and alternate soil C and N models on C dynamics of CLM4, Biogeosciences, 10, 7109–7131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7109-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-7109-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Krinner, G., Lézine, A. M., Braconnot, P., Sepulchre, P., Ramstein, G.,
Grenier, C., and Gouttevin, I.: A reassessment of lake and wetland feedbacks
on the North African Holocene climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L07701,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL050992" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL050992</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kutzbach, J., Bonan, G., Foley, J., and Harrison, S.: Vegetation and soil
feedbacks on the response of the African monsoon to orbital forcing in the
early to middle Holocene, Nature, 384, 623–626, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kutzbach, J. E.: Monsoon climate of the early Holocene: Climate experiment
with the Earth's orbital parameters for 9000 years ago, Science, 214,
59–61, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kutzbach, J. E. and Liu, Z.: Response of the African Monsoon to Orbital
Forcing and Ocean Feedbacks in the Middle Holocene, Science, 278, 440–443,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kutzbach, J. E. and Street-Perrott, F. A.: Milankovitch forcing of
fluctuations in the level of tropical lakes from 18 to 0 kyr BP, Nature,
317, 130–134, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Larrasoana, J. C., Roberts, A. P., and Rohling, E. J.: Dynamics of Green
Sahara periods and their role in Hominin evolution, PLoS ONE, 8, e76514,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076514" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0076514</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lawrence, D. M., Oleson, K. W., Flanner, M. G., Thorton, P. E., Swenson, S.
C., Lawrence, P. J., Zeng, X., Yang, Z.-L., Levis, S., Skaguchi, K., Bonan,
G. B., and Slater, A. G.: Parameterization improvements and functional and
structural advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 3, 2011MS000045, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011ms000045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011ms000045</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Leblanc, M., Favreau, G., Maley, J., Nazoumou, Y., Leduc, C., Stagnitti, F.,
van Oevelen, P. J., Delclaux, F., and Lemoalle, J.: Reconstruction of
Megalake Chad using Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission data, Palaeogeogr.
Palaeocl., 239, 16–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.01.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.01.003</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, J. and Hong, J.: Model output data, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5788013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.5788013</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Levine, X. J. and Boos, W. R.: Land surface albedo bias in climate models
and its association with tropical rainfall, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44,
6363–6372, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Levis, B. S., Bonan, G. B., and Bonfils, C.: Soil feedback drives the
mid-Holocene North African monsoon northward in fully coupled CCSM2
simulations with a dynamic vegetation model, Clim. Dynam., 23, 791–802,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-004-0477-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-004-0477-y</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lu, Z., Miller, P. A., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Q., Wårlind, D., Nieradzik, L.,
Sjolte, J., and Smith, B.: Dynamic vegetation simulations of the
mid-Holocene Green Sahara, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 8294–8303, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Neale, R. B., Richter, J., Park, S., Lauritzen, P. H., Vavrus, S. J., Rasch,
P. J., and Zhang, M.: The Mean Climate of the Community Atmosphere Model
(CAM4) in Forced SST and Fully Coupled Experiments, J. Climate, 26,
5150–5168, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00236.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00236.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Oleson, K. W., Lawrence, D. M., Bonan, G. B., Flanner, M. G., Kluzek, E.,
Lawrence, P. J., Levis, S., Swenson, S. C., Thornton, P. E., Dai, A.,
Decker, M., Dickinson, R., Feddema, J., Heald, C. L., Hoffman, F., Lamarque,
J.-F., Mahowald, N., Niu, G.-Y., Qian, T., Randerson, J., Running, S.,
Sakaguchi, K., Slater, A., Stockli, R., Wang, A., Yang, Z.-L., Zeng, X., and
Zeng, X.: Technical Description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model
(CLM), Tech. Rep. NCAR/TN-478<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>STR, National Center for Atmospheric
Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pachur, H. J. and Kröpelin, S.: Wadi Howar–Paleoclimatic evidence from an extinct river system in the Southeastern Sahara, Science, 237, 298–300, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pausata, F. S. R., Messori, G., and Zhang, Q.: Impacts of dust reduction on
the northward expansion of the African monsoon during the Green Sahara
period, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 434, 298–307, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pausata, F. S. R., Gaetani, M., Messori, G., Berg, A., de Souza, D. M., Sage,
R. F., and deMenocal, P. B.: The Greening of the Sahara: Past Changes and
Future Implications, One Earth, 2, 235–250, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Quade, J., Dente, E., Armon, M., Dor, Y. B., Morin, E., Adam, O., and Enzel,
Y.: Megalakes in the Sahara? A review, Quaternary Res., 90, 253–275, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rachmayani, R., Prange, M., and Schulz, M.: North African vegetation–precipitation feedback in early and mid-Holocene climate simulations with CCSM3-DGVM, Clim. Past, 11, 175–185, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-175-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-11-175-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schuster, M., Roquin, C., Duringer, P., Brunet, M., Caugy, M., Fontugne, M.,
Mackaye, H. T., Vignaud, P., and Ghienne, J. F.: Holocene Lake Mega-Chad
palaeoshorelines from space, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 24, 1821–1827, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shanahan, T. M., McKay, N. P., Hughen, K. A., Overpeck, J. T.,
Otto-Bliesner, B., Heil, C. W., King, J., Scholz, C. A., and Peck, J.: The
time-transgressive termination of the African Humid Period, Nat. Geosci., 8,
140–144, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2329" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2329</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page326?><ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Takata, K., Emori, S., and Watanabe, T.: Development of the minimal advanced
treatments of surface interaction and runoff, Global Planet. Change, 38,
209–222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(03)00030-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0921-8181(03)00030-4</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thornton, P. E. and Rosenbloom, N. A.: Ecosystem model spin-up: Estimating steady
state conditions in a coupled terrestrial carbon and nitrogen cycle model,
Ecol. Model., 189, 25–48, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.04.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.04.008</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thornton, P. E., Law, B. E., Gholz, H. L., Clark, K. L., Falge, E.,
Ellsworth, D. S., Goldstein, A. H., Monson, R. K., Hollinger, D., Falk, M.,
Chen, J., and Sparks, J. P.: Modeling and measuring the effects of
disturbance history and climate on carbon and water budgets in evergreen
needleleaf forests, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 113, 185–222,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00108-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00108-9</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thornton, P. E., Lamarque, J.-F., Rosenbloom, N. A., and Mahowald, N. M.:
Influence of carbon-nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
fertilization and climate variability, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB4018,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002868</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thornton, P. E., Doney, S. C., Lindsay, K., Moore, J. K., Mahowald, N., Randerson, J. T., Fung, I., Lamarque, J.-F., Feddema, J. J., and Lee, Y.-H.: Carbon-nitrogen interactions regulate climate-carbon cycle feedbacks: results from an atmosphere-ocean general circulation model, Biogeosciences, 6, 2099–2120, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2099-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-2099-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tierney, J. E., Pausata, F. S., and deMenocal, P. B.: Rainfall regimes of
the Green Sahara, Sci. Adv., 3, e1601503,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601503" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.1601503</ext-link>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vamborg, F. S. E., Brovkin, V., and Claussen, M.: The effect of a dynamic background albedo scheme on Sahel/Sahara precipitation during the mid-Holocene, Clim. Past, 7, 117–131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-117-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-7-117-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Li, Y., Ye, X., Chu, Y., and Wang, X.: Profile storage of
organic/inorganic carbon in soil: From forest to desert, Sci. Total
Environ., 408, 1925–1931, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.01.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.01.015</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Watanabe, M., Suzuki, T., O'ishi, R., Komuro, Y., Watanabe, S., Emori, S.,
Takemura, T., Chikira, M., Ogura, T., Sekiguchi, M., Takata, K., Yamazaki,
D., Yokohata, T., Nozawa, T., Hasumi, H., Tatebe, H., and Kimoto, M.:
Improved Climate Simulation by MIROC5: Mean States, Variability, and Climate
Sensitivity, J. Climate, 23, 6312–6335, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3679.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2010JCLI3679.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, M. L. C., Reale, O., Schubert, S. D., Suarez, M. J., Koster, R. D., and
Pegion, P. J.: African easterly jet: Structure and maintenance, J. Climate,
22, 4459–4480, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2584.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JCLI2584.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Yang, R., Su, Y., Wang, M., Wang, T., Yang, X., Fan, G., and Wu, T.: Spatial
pattern of soil organic carbon in desert grasslands of the diluvial-alluvial
plains of northern Qilian Mountains, J. Arid Land, 6, 136–144, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zeng, X.: Overview of soil, vegetation, and snow albedos in weather and climate models, Annual meeting of the American Meteorological Society, San Diego, USA, 13 January 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Effect of nitrogen limitation and soil biophysics on Holocene greening of the Sahara</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Arora, V. K., Katavouta, A., Williams, R. G., Jones, C. D., Brovkin, V., Friedlingstein, P., Schwinger, J., Bopp, L., Boucher, O., Cadule, P., Chamberlain, M. A., Christian, J. R., Delire, C., Fisher, R. A., Hajima, T., Ilyina, T., Joetzjer, E., Kawamiya, M., Koven, C. D., Krasting, J. P., Law, R. M., Lawrence, D. M., Lenton, A., Lindsay, K., Pongratz, J., Raddatz, T., Séférian, R., Tachiiri, K., Tjiputra, J. F., Wiltshire, A., Wu, T., and Ziehn, T.: Carbon–concentration and carbon–climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models, Biogeosciences, 17, 4173–4222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4173-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4173-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Berger, A. L.: Long-Term Variations of Caloric Insolation Resulting from the
Earth's Orbital Elements 1, Quaternary Res., 9, 139–167, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bonfils, C., de Noblet-Ducoudre, N., Braconnot, P., and Joussaume, S.: Hot
desert albedo and climate change: Mid-Holocene monsoon in North Africa, J.
Climate, 17, 3724–3737, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Braconnot, P., Joussaume, S., Marti, O., and de Noblet, N.: Synergistic
Feedbacks from Ocean and Vegetation on the African Monsoon Response to
Mid-Holocene Insolation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2481–2484, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Braconnot, P., Zhu, D., Marti, O., and Servonnat, J.: Strengths and challenges for transient Mid- to Late Holocene simulations with dynamical vegetation, Clim. Past, 15, 997–1024, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-997-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-997-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brooks, M. L.: Effects of increased soil nitrogen on the dominance of alien
annual plants in the Mojave Desert, J. Appl. Ecol., 40, 344–353, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Broxton, P. D., Zeng, X., Sulla-Menashe, D., and Troch, P. A.: A global land
cover climatology using MODIS data, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 53, 1593–1605, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0270.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0270.1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Castillo, C. K. G., Levis, S., and Thornton, P. E.: Evaluation of the New
CNDV Option of the Community Land Model: Effects of Dynamic Vegetation and
Interactive Nitrogen on CLM4 Means and Variability, J. Climate, 25,
3702–3714, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00372.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00372.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cess, R. D.: Biosphere-Albedo Feedback and Climate Modeling, J. Atmos. Sci.,
35, 1765–1768, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Charney, J. G.: Dynamics of Deserts and Drought in Sahel, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 101, 193–202, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chikira, M., Abe-Ouchi, A., and Sumi, A.: General circulation model study on
the green Sahara during the mid-Holocene: an
impact of convection originating above boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.,
111, D21103, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006398" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006398</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Claussen, M.: On multiple solutions of the atmosphere-vegetation system in
present-day climate, Glob. Change Biol., 4, 549–559, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Claussen, M., Kubatzki, C., Brovkin, V., Ganoposki, A., Hoelzmann, P., and
Pachur, H. J.: Simulation of an abrupt change in Saharan vegetation in the
mid-Holocene, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2037–2040, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Claussen, M., Bathiany, S., Brovkin, V., and Kleinen, T.: Simulated
climate-vegetation interaction in semi-arid regions affected by plant
diversity, Nat. Geosci., 6, 954–958, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Claussen, M., Dallmeyer, A., and Bader, J.: Theory and modeling of the
African humid period and the green Sahara, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of
Climate Science, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.532" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.532</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Coe, M. and Bonan, G.: Feedbacks between climate and surface water in
northern Africa during the middle Holocene, J. Geophys. Res., 102,
11087–11101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00343" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00343</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Contoux, C., Jost, A., Ramstein, G., Sepulchre, P., Krinner, G., and Schuster, M.: Megalake Chad impact on climate and vegetation during the late Pliocene and the mid-Holocene, Clim. Past, 9, 1417–1430, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-1417-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-1417-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, K. H.: Generation of the African Easterly Jet and its role in determining West African precipitation, J. Climate, 12, 1165–1184, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Gaetani, M., Messori, G., Zhang, Q., Flamant, C., and Pausata, F. S. R.:
Understanding the Mechanisms behind the Northward Extension of the West
African Monsoon during the Mid-Holocene, J. Climate, 30, 7621–7642,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0299.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0299.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Groner, V. P., Raddatz, T., Reick, C. H., and Claussen, M.: Plant functional diversity affects climate–vegetation interaction, Biogeosciences, 15, 1947–1968, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1947-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1947-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Harrison, S. P., Bartlein, P. J., Izumi, K., Li, G., Annan, J., Hargreaves,
J., Braconnot, P. B., and Kageyama, M.: Implications of evaluation of CMIP5
palaeosimulations for climate projections, Nat. Clim. Change, 5, 735–743, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2649" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2649</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hély, C., Lézine, A.-M., and contributors, A.: Holocene changes in African vegetation: tradeoff between climate and water availability, Clim. Past, 10, 681–686, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-681-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-681-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, J. A.: How the Sahara became dry, Science, 320, 752–753, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hopcroft, P. O., Valdes, P. J., Harper, A. B., and Beerling, D. J.: Multi
vegetation model evaluation of the Green Sahara climate regime, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 44, 6804–6813, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Houldcroft, C., Grey, W., Barnsley, M., Taylor, C., Los, S., and North, P.:
New Vegetation Albedo Parameters and Global Fields of Soil Background Albedo
Derived from MODIS for Use in a Climate Model, J. Hydrometeorol., 10,
183–198, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hurrell, J. W., Holland, M. M., Gent, P. R., Ghan, S., Kay, J. E., Kushner,
P., Lamarque, J.-F., Large, W. G., Lawrence, D., Lindsay, K., Lipscomb, W.
H., Long, M. C., Mahowald, N., Marsh, D. R., Neale, R. B., Rasch, P.,
Vavrus, S., Vertenstein, M., Bader, D., Collins, W. D., Hack, J. J., Kiehl,
J., and Marshall, S.: The Community Earth System Model: a framework for
collaborative research, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1339–1360, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Jolly, D., Harrison, S. P., Damnati, B., and Bonnefille, R.: Simulated
climate and biomes of Africa during the Late Quaternary: comparisons with
pollen and lake status data, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 17, 629–657, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Kluzek, E.: CESM research tools: CLM4 in CESM1.0.4, User's guide
documentation, National Centers for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, USA, <a href="https://svn-ccsm-models.cgd.ucar.edu/clm2/branch_tags/cesm1_0_4_rel_tags/cesm1_0_4_n05_clm4_0_32/models/lnd/clm/doc/UsersGuide/clm_ug.xml" target="_blank"/> (last access: 2 February 2022), 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Knorr, W. and Schnitzler, K. G.: Enhanced albedo feedback in North Africa
from possible combined vegetation and soil formation processes, Clim.
Dynam., 26, 55–63, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Knorr, W., Schnitzler, K. G., and Govaerts, Y.: The role of bright desert
regions in shaping North African climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28,
3489–3492, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Koven, C. D., Riley, W. J., Subin, Z. M., Tang, J. Y., Torn, M. S., Collins, W. D., Bonan, G. B., Lawrence, D. M., and Swenson, S. C.: The effect of vertically resolved soil biogeochemistry and alternate soil C and N models on C dynamics of CLM4, Biogeosciences, 10, 7109–7131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7109-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7109-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Krinner, G., Lézine, A. M., Braconnot, P., Sepulchre, P., Ramstein, G.,
Grenier, C., and Gouttevin, I.: A reassessment of lake and wetland feedbacks
on the North African Holocene climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L07701,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL050992" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL050992</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kutzbach, J., Bonan, G., Foley, J., and Harrison, S.: Vegetation and soil
feedbacks on the response of the African monsoon to orbital forcing in the
early to middle Holocene, Nature, 384, 623–626, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kutzbach, J. E.: Monsoon climate of the early Holocene: Climate experiment
with the Earth's orbital parameters for 9000 years ago, Science, 214,
59–61, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kutzbach, J. E. and Liu, Z.: Response of the African Monsoon to Orbital
Forcing and Ocean Feedbacks in the Middle Holocene, Science, 278, 440–443,
1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kutzbach, J. E. and Street-Perrott, F. A.: Milankovitch forcing of
fluctuations in the level of tropical lakes from 18 to 0 kyr BP, Nature,
317, 130–134, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Larrasoana, J. C., Roberts, A. P., and Rohling, E. J.: Dynamics of Green
Sahara periods and their role in Hominin evolution, PLoS ONE, 8, e76514,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076514" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076514</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Lawrence, D. M., Oleson, K. W., Flanner, M. G., Thorton, P. E., Swenson, S.
C., Lawrence, P. J., Zeng, X., Yang, Z.-L., Levis, S., Skaguchi, K., Bonan,
G. B., and Slater, A. G.: Parameterization improvements and functional and
structural advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 3, 2011MS000045, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011ms000045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011ms000045</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Leblanc, M., Favreau, G., Maley, J., Nazoumou, Y., Leduc, C., Stagnitti, F.,
van Oevelen, P. J., Delclaux, F., and Lemoalle, J.: Reconstruction of
Megalake Chad using Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission data, Palaeogeogr.
Palaeocl., 239, 16–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.01.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.01.003</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, J. and Hong, J.: Model output data, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5788013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5788013</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Levine, X. J. and Boos, W. R.: Land surface albedo bias in climate models
and its association with tropical rainfall, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44,
6363–6372, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Levis, B. S., Bonan, G. B., and Bonfils, C.: Soil feedback drives the
mid-Holocene North African monsoon northward in fully coupled CCSM2
simulations with a dynamic vegetation model, Clim. Dynam., 23, 791–802,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-004-0477-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-004-0477-y</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, Z., Miller, P. A., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Q., Wårlind, D., Nieradzik, L.,
Sjolte, J., and Smith, B.: Dynamic vegetation simulations of the
mid-Holocene Green Sahara, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 8294–8303, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Neale, R. B., Richter, J., Park, S., Lauritzen, P. H., Vavrus, S. J., Rasch,
P. J., and Zhang, M.: The Mean Climate of the Community Atmosphere Model
(CAM4) in Forced SST and Fully Coupled Experiments, J. Climate, 26,
5150–5168, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00236.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00236.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Oleson, K. W., Lawrence, D. M., Bonan, G. B., Flanner, M. G., Kluzek, E.,
Lawrence, P. J., Levis, S., Swenson, S. C., Thornton, P. E., Dai, A.,
Decker, M., Dickinson, R., Feddema, J., Heald, C. L., Hoffman, F., Lamarque,
J.-F., Mahowald, N., Niu, G.-Y., Qian, T., Randerson, J., Running, S.,
Sakaguchi, K., Slater, A., Stockli, R., Wang, A., Yang, Z.-L., Zeng, X., and
Zeng, X.: Technical Description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model
(CLM), Tech. Rep. NCAR/TN-478+STR, National Center for Atmospheric
Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Pachur, H. J. and Kröpelin, S.: Wadi Howar–Paleoclimatic evidence from an extinct river system in the Southeastern Sahara, Science, 237, 298–300, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Pausata, F. S. R., Messori, G., and Zhang, Q.: Impacts of dust reduction on
the northward expansion of the African monsoon during the Green Sahara
period, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 434, 298–307, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Pausata, F. S. R., Gaetani, M., Messori, G., Berg, A., de Souza, D. M., Sage,
R. F., and deMenocal, P. B.: The Greening of the Sahara: Past Changes and
Future Implications, One Earth, 2, 235–250, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Quade, J., Dente, E., Armon, M., Dor, Y. B., Morin, E., Adam, O., and Enzel,
Y.: Megalakes in the Sahara? A review, Quaternary Res., 90, 253–275, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Rachmayani, R., Prange, M., and Schulz, M.: North African vegetation–precipitation feedback in early and mid-Holocene climate simulations with CCSM3-DGVM, Clim. Past, 11, 175–185, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-175-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-175-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Schuster, M., Roquin, C., Duringer, P., Brunet, M., Caugy, M., Fontugne, M.,
Mackaye, H. T., Vignaud, P., and Ghienne, J. F.: Holocene Lake Mega-Chad
palaeoshorelines from space, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 24, 1821–1827, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Shanahan, T. M., McKay, N. P., Hughen, K. A., Overpeck, J. T.,
Otto-Bliesner, B., Heil, C. W., King, J., Scholz, C. A., and Peck, J.: The
time-transgressive termination of the African Humid Period, Nat. Geosci., 8,
140–144, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2329" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2329</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Takata, K., Emori, S., and Watanabe, T.: Development of the minimal advanced
treatments of surface interaction and runoff, Global Planet. Change, 38,
209–222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(03)00030-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(03)00030-4</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Thornton, P. E. and Rosenbloom, N. A.: Ecosystem model spin-up: Estimating steady
state conditions in a coupled terrestrial carbon and nitrogen cycle model,
Ecol. Model., 189, 25–48, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.04.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.04.008</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Thornton, P. E., Law, B. E., Gholz, H. L., Clark, K. L., Falge, E.,
Ellsworth, D. S., Goldstein, A. H., Monson, R. K., Hollinger, D., Falk, M.,
Chen, J., and Sparks, J. P.: Modeling and measuring the effects of
disturbance history and climate on carbon and water budgets in evergreen
needleleaf forests, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 113, 185–222,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00108-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00108-9</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Thornton, P. E., Lamarque, J.-F., Rosenbloom, N. A., and Mahowald, N. M.:
Influence of carbon-nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO<sub>2</sub>
fertilization and climate variability, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB4018,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002868" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002868</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Thornton, P. E., Doney, S. C., Lindsay, K., Moore, J. K., Mahowald, N., Randerson, J. T., Fung, I., Lamarque, J.-F., Feddema, J. J., and Lee, Y.-H.: Carbon-nitrogen interactions regulate climate-carbon cycle feedbacks: results from an atmosphere-ocean general circulation model, Biogeosciences, 6, 2099–2120, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2099-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2099-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Tierney, J. E., Pausata, F. S., and deMenocal, P. B.: Rainfall regimes of
the Green Sahara, Sci. Adv., 3, e1601503,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601503" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601503</a>, 2017.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Vamborg, F. S. E., Brovkin, V., and Claussen, M.: The effect of a dynamic background albedo scheme on Sahel/Sahara precipitation during the mid-Holocene, Clim. Past, 7, 117–131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-117-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-117-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Li, Y., Ye, X., Chu, Y., and Wang, X.: Profile storage of
organic/inorganic carbon in soil: From forest to desert, Sci. Total
Environ., 408, 1925–1931, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.01.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.01.015</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Watanabe, M., Suzuki, T., O'ishi, R., Komuro, Y., Watanabe, S., Emori, S.,
Takemura, T., Chikira, M., Ogura, T., Sekiguchi, M., Takata, K., Yamazaki,
D., Yokohata, T., Nozawa, T., Hasumi, H., Tatebe, H., and Kimoto, M.:
Improved Climate Simulation by MIROC5: Mean States, Variability, and Climate
Sensitivity, J. Climate, 23, 6312–6335, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3679.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3679.1</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, M. L. C., Reale, O., Schubert, S. D., Suarez, M. J., Koster, R. D., and
Pegion, P. J.: African easterly jet: Structure and maintenance, J. Climate,
22, 4459–4480, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2584.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2584.1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, R., Su, Y., Wang, M., Wang, T., Yang, X., Fan, G., and Wu, T.: Spatial
pattern of soil organic carbon in desert grasslands of the diluvial-alluvial
plains of northern Qilian Mountains, J. Arid Land, 6, 136–144, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Zeng, X.: Overview of soil, vegetation, and snow albedos in weather and climate models, Annual meeting of the American Meteorological Society, San Diego, USA, 13 January 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
