<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">CP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Climate of the Past</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">CP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Clim. Past</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1814-9332</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/cp-17-615-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Simulated stability of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning
Circulation during the Last Glacial Maximum</article-title><alt-title>Simulated stability of the AMOC during the LGM</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Simulated stability of the AMOC during the LGM}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{F. P\"{o}ppelmeier et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name><surname>Pöppelmeier</surname><given-names>Frerk</given-names></name>
          <email>frerk.poeppelmeier@climate.unibe.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4050-2550</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Scheen</surname><given-names>Jeemijn</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-0224</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Jeltsch-Thömmes</surname><given-names>Aurich</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2050-1975</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Stocker</surname><given-names>Thomas F.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Climate and Environmental Physics, Physics Institute and Oeschger
Center for Climate Change Research, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>University of Bern, 3012 Bern,
Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Frerk Pöppelmeier
(frerk.poeppelmeier@climate.unibe.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>11</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>615</fpage><lpage>632</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>15</day><month>October</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>21</day><month>October</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>February</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>February</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e107">The response of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning
Circulation (AMOC) to freshwater perturbations critically depends on its
mean state. Large swaths of icebergs melting in the North Atlantic during
the last deglaciation constituted such perturbations and can, thus, provide
important constraints on the stability of the AMOC. However, the mean AMOC state
during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), preceding the rapid disintegration of
the ice sheets during the deglaciation, as well as its response to these
perturbations remain debated. Here, we investigate the evolution of the AMOC as it
responds to freshwater perturbations under improved LGM boundary
conditions in the Bern3D intermediate complexity model. Particularly, we
consider the effect of an open versus a closed Bering Strait and the effect
of increased tidal dissipation as a result of the altered bathymetry due to
the lower glacial sea level stand. The vigorous and deep AMOC under these
glacial boundary conditions, consistent with previous simulations with
different models, reacts more strongly to North Atlantic freshwater forcings
than under preindustrial conditions. This increased sensitivity is mostly
related to the closed Bering Strait that cuts off the freshwater escape
route through the Arctic into the Pacific, thereby facilitating faster
accumulation of freshwater in the North Atlantic and halting deep-water
formation. Proxy reconstructions of the LGM AMOC instead indicate a weaker
and possibly shallower AMOC than today, which is in conflict with the particularly
strong and deep circulation states coherently simulated with ocean
circulation models for the LGM. Simulations with reduced North Atlantic deep-water formation, as a consequence of potentially increased continental
runoff from ice sheet melt and imposed changes in the hydrological cycle,
more closely resemble the overturning circulation inferred from proxies.
These circulation states also show bistable behavior, where the AMOC does
not recover after North Atlantic freshwater hosing. However, no AMOC states
are found here that either comprise an extreme shoaling or vigorous and
concurrent shallow overturning as previously proposed based on
paleoceanographic data.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e119">The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) redistributes heat, nutrients, and carbon between the hemispheres and constitutes an important tipping element in Earth's climate system (Lenton et al., 2008; Stocker and Wright, 1991). In light of this, painstaking efforts have been devoted to
thoroughly understand its sensitivity and response to perturbations that are
thought to play a major role in climate variability. Today, the zonally
integrated Atlantic circulation is characterized by two overturning cells
that are driven by the southward transport of North Atlantic Deep Water
(NADW) and northward flowing Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW) occupying abyssal
depths. Paleoreconstructions provide ample evidence that the AMOC
experienced extensive reorganizations in the past (Böhm et al., 2015;
Broecker and Denton, 1989; McManus et al., 2004; Stocker, 2000). Large AMOC
variability is particularly well-documented for the transition from the Last
Glacial Maximum (LGM, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kyr ago), characterized by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm lower atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (Monnin et
al., 2001) and large continental ice sheets responsible for about 120 m
lower sea level (Lambeck et al., 2014), into the current interglacial
(Lehman and Keigwin, 1992; McManus et al., 2004). Nonetheless, a<?pagebreak page616?> large array
of uncertainties remain concerning the triggers of these abrupt climate
events (Barker et al., 2015) and the overall mean AMOC state during the last
glacial that facilitated the rapid sequence of climate changes during the
following deglaciation (see Lynch-Stieglitz, 2017, for a review).</p>
      <p id="d1e153">Notably, the water mass geometry and circulation strength of the glacial
AMOC and Southern Ocean have received continuous attention over the past decades
in order to improve the understanding of deep-ocean carbon storage under the
different climatic boundary conditions that prevailed during the LGM. Yet,
no consistent framework of the glacial AMOC has emerged to date
(Lynch-Stieglitz, 2017). Early proxy reconstructions suggested a weaker and
substantially shallower glacial AMOC (Curry and Oppo, 2005; Duplessy et al., 1988; Fischer et al., 2010; Sarnthein et al., 1994). However, recent
investigations have provided a first clue that the initial interpretations of
these data may have overestimated the extent of shoaling (Gebbie, 2014; Oppo
et al., 2018). These findings are corroborated by reconstructions of the
AMOC geometry based on Nd isotopes (Du et al., 2020; Howe et al., 2016;
Pöppelmeier et al., 2020) providing evidence for little to no change in
the overall water mass provenance in the Atlantic between today and the LGM.
In addition, reconstructions of the AMOC strength provide equally ambiguous
results, either indicating a more vigorous but shallow (Bradtmiller et al., 2014; Lippold et al., 2012) or, in contrast, strongly weakened deep-ocean
circulation (Freeman et al., 2016; Skinner et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e156">LGM model simulations in the framework of the third phase of the
Paleoclimate Model Intercomparison Project (PMIP3) have not yet helped to
reconcile the contrasting AMOC states suggested by proxy reconstructions, as
they consistently indicate a stronger and deeper AMOC than during the
preindustrial (PI) period (Muglia and Schmittner, 2015). Only a handful of studies
have tried to reconcile proxy data and model simulation by an integrated
intercomparison approach mainly based on stable carbon isotope data (e.g.,
Gebbie, 2014; Hesse et al., 2011; Menviel et al., 2017, 2020). Generally,
these studies require additional forcings such as freshwater or moisture
transport fluxes to achieve a reasonable model–data agreement, and results
remain ambiguous regarding parameters such as circulation strength (Menviel
et al., 2020). This large uncertainty in the mean glacial AMOC state
contributes to the lack of understanding of the response of the AMOC to
freshwater perturbations as they have occurred during the last deglaciation
(Heinrich Stadial 1 and Younger Dryas; Broecker et al., 1992) and may resurface in
the future under accelerated warming (Stocker and Schmittner, 1997) or
Greenland ice sheet melting (Driesschaert et al., 2007). Proxy
reconstructions indicate a substantial slowdown of the Atlantic deep
circulation during these freshwater discharge events in the past (McManus et
al., 2004; Oppo et al., 2015), but quantitative estimates of this weakening
remain extremely challenging to obtain due to large proxy uncertainties. In
addition, the freshwater fluxes that drove the slowdown are equally poorly
constrained (Clark et al., 2001; Roberts et al., 2014). Taken together,
large uncertainties remain in our understanding of the stability of the
AMOC.</p>
      <p id="d1e159">Here, we investigate the impact of critical changes in the boundary
conditions between the LGM and PI on the mean AMOC state in the Bern3D Earth
system model of intermediate complexity. These changes comprise orbital and
radiative forcings, closure of the Bering Strait, changes in the wind
stress, and elevated tidal dissipation due to lower sea level changing
shallow-ocean bathymetry. In order to identify processes that affect the
stability of these AMOC states, we then apply freshwater forcings to the
North Atlantic in classical hosing experiments. Finally, we look into the
processes that are required to force the model from a mono-stable regime
into bistability, with an AMOC that does not recover after freshwater
perturbations. This concerns the sensitivity of the hysteresis to model
parameters and configurations. The latter may be responsible for transient
changes in the hysteresis structure during the transition from the glacial
to the Holocene (Stocker and Marchal, 2000).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Model description and simulations</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Model description</title>
      <p id="d1e177">The Bern3D model version 2.0 is an Earth system model of intermediate
complexity with a horizontal resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cells and 32
logarithmically scaled depth layers (Edwards et al., 1998; Müller et
al., 2006; Roth et al., 2014). The geostrophic-frictional balance ocean
model features an isopycnal diffusion scheme and Gent–McWilliams
parametrization for eddy-induced transport (Griffies, 1998) and is coupled
to a single-layer energy–moisture balance model on the same horizontal grid
(Ritz et al., 2011). Wind stress and cloud cover are prescribed from
present-day monthly climatologies (ERA40; Kalnay et al., 1996). We further
diagnose the ideal water age through a tracer that is explicitly transported
by advection, diffusion, and convection but is set to zero at the surface
and otherwise increases at a rate of 1 yr yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e207">List of simulation setups.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Simulation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Adjustments</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PI_CTRL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Preindustrial boundary conditions.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGM_CTRL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Orbital and radiative forcing of 20 kyr BP.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGM_BS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">“LGM_CTRL” <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> closed Bering Strait.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">“LGM_BS” <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> added wind stress anomaly of LGM from PMIP3 models (Muglia and Schmittner, 2015).</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">“LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind” <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> tidal-mixing-induced changes in diapycnal diffusivity due to lower sea level (Wilmes et al., 2019).</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e328">For the LGM control simulations, the orbital parameters were set to 20 kyr BP
(Berger, 1978), and radiative forcing of greenhouse gases was prescribed
corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">191</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">208</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb. Further, the LGM ice sheet extent and related changes to the albedo were constrained by reconstructions by Peltier (1994). In order to achieve topologically more realistic glacial boundary conditions, we investigate the impact of a closed Bering Strait on the AMOC, which is
represented in the model by a single grid cell with a depth of about 40 m
and a mean simulated meridional throughflow of 0.5 Sv (sverdrup; 1 Sv <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the Pacific to the Arctic, which is at the
lower end of the observed range of 0.4 to 1.2 Sv (Woodgate et al., 2005).
The seasonally varying wind stress is prescribed in the model based on
modern climatologies but was<?pagebreak page617?> substantially different during the LGM mostly
because the Laurentide and Fennoscandian ice sheets modulated the northern
westerlies (Muglia and Schmittner, 2015). To alleviate this issue, we
calculated LGM anomalies of zonal and meridional wind stresses from five
PMIP3 model outputs of the LGM (CCSM4, CNRM, GISS, MIROC, and MPI; Braconnot
et al., 2012) and added the multi-model mean to the prescribed modern wind
stress fields following the approach of Muglia and Schmittner (2015) (Fig. B2a, b). Finally, due to lower sea level, tidal dissipation and, hence,
diapycnal mixing was substantially increased (1.8–3.0 times) during the LGM
(Egbert et al., 2004; Schmittner and Egbert, 2014). To account for this
increase in vertical mixing, we replaced the globally uniform diapycnal
diffusivity scheme with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of the Bern3D model with the output from the UVic model coupled to the
high-resolution OTIS tide model, providing 3D diapycnal diffusivity fields
for the LGM (Wilmes et al., 2019). We use the UVic-OTIS simulation with sea
levels derived from the ICE-6G database (Fig. B2c). For this simulation, the
background diffusivity was kept constant; thus, the diapycnal
diffusivities can be assumed to represent a conservative estimate, as the
effects of remotely dissipated tidal energy are neglected (Wilmes et al., 2019). Table 1 provides an overview of the model simulations with the
according adjustments to the boundary conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e479">Rearrangements of the routing of continental precipitation to the oceans
were not performed, as Muglia and Schmittner (2015) indicated that such
changes have little influence on the ocean circulation. Further, average
salinities due to lower sea level were not increased for the LGM
simulations, because we do not focus here on globally uniform changes in
salinity, and simulations with an adjusted salt budget indicate negligible
effects on the AMOC (not shown).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Freshwater hosing experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e490">In order to test the stability of the AMOC, we performed freshwater hosing
experiments. For all experiments, we applied the freshwater hosing constantly
over 500 years, evenly distributed over the northern North Atlantic between
45 and 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (Fig. B1). Simulations were hosed with 0.1 to 1.0 Sv of freshwater. The freshwater was not compensated for in the rest of the ocean, in order to avoid salinity feedbacks elsewhere (Stocker
et al., 2007). Moreover, we are interested here in the AMOC responses of the
late glacial–early deglacial to freshwater perturbations (i.e., Heinrich
Stadial 1 analogs), which were a net addition of freshwater; hence, we
consider this approach more realistic.</p>
      <p id="d1e502">We also performed a set of experiments with increasing North Pacific to
North Atlantic freshwater transfer flux adjustments. This tests the effect
of background continental ice sheet runoff and the strength of the
Pacific to Atlantic freshwater transport via the atmospheric hydrological
cycle (Zaucker et al., 1994). By constantly adding 0.02 to 0.12 Sv of
freshwater to the North Atlantic and removing the same amount from the North
Pacific (i.e., adding salt), we progressively weaken the AMOC and equilibrate
these states over 5000 years before starting further experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Model initialization</title>
      <p id="d1e513">The Bern3D model was spun up over 35 kyr to a preindustrial (1765 CE)
equilibrium comprising greenhouse gas concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">278</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">722</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">273</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb. For the
LGM_CTRL simulation, the model was further spun up over 10 kyr continuing from PI_CTRL to orbital parameters adjusted to 20 kyr BP (Berger, 1978) and greenhouse gas concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">191</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">208</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb. For
all simulations with a closed Bering Strait (LGM_BS,
LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind, and LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal), this
same procedure was performed with the sole difference of the changed
bathymetry at the Bering Strait and the respective different wind stress fields and/or diapycnal diffusivities. The freshwater experiments were then started from the corresponding spin-ups.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e671">Response of circulation strength of the <bold>(a)</bold> AMOC, <bold>(b)</bold> PMOC,
and <bold>(c)</bold> SOMOC to freshwater hosing experiments for the preindustrial control. The freshwater (FW) was added for 500 years (start and end are indicated by the vertical dashed lines) to the North Atlantic between 45 and 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (Fig. B1). PMOC and SOMOC circulation
cells flow anticlockwise and are, hence, defined as negative by convention (cf.
Fig. 2), but they are plotted here as positive values for convenience. Note the
different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes in the panels. Blue arrows in panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> mark time steps for which the stream functions are shown in Fig. 2.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/615/2021/cp-17-615-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Preindustrial AMOC stability</title>
      <p id="d1e728">Under preindustrial boundary conditions the AMOC strength in the Bern3D
model is 17.7 Sv (maximum of the Atlantic overturning stream function below
400 m water depth; Fig. 1a), and the upper circulation cell, defined as
positive values in the stream function, reaches down to about 3000 m depth
(Fig. 2a). While the AMOC strength is in good agreement with
estimates constrained using observations (17.2 Sv; McCarthy et al., 2015), the
depth of the upper cell is too shallow compared with observations (Jenkins et
al., 2015).<?pagebreak page618?> During freshwater perturbations the AMOC weakens substantially
within 50 years and then evolves somewhat differently depending on the
amount of freshwater hosing (Fig. 1a): with 0.1 Sv freshwater hosing the
AMOC quickly stabilizes for the duration of the continuous hosing of 500 years, whereas more than 0.2 Sv freshwater forcing leads to an additional AMOC weakening for another 100 to 200 years. The minimum AMOC strength during
hosing does not decrease linearly with the amount of freshwater but instead
approaches a collapsed state that slightly recovers during hosing before
stabilizing at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv for freshwater perturbations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv. For all PI freshwater hosing experiments the AMOC returns to its initial
steady-state value within 600 years (time after hosing until the
steady-state strength is reached again, i.e., prior to the overshoot),
indicating mono-stability of the AMOC. However, this recovery time increases
with the amount of freshwater from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years for 0.1 Sv to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years for 1.0 Sv. The Pacific Meridional Overturning
Circulation (PMOC, defined as minimum overturning in the Pacific north of
30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) is about 14.0 Sv (Fig. 1b), which is comparable to modern
observations of 14.9 Sv (Fig. 2b; McCarthy et al., 2015). The structural
response of the PMOC to North Atlantic freshwater hosings is similar to the
AMOC, yet with strongly diminished amplitudes in strength reductions. For
freshwater amounts <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv, the reduction in PMOC strength is only
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv, whereas it is about 5.5 Sv for a North Atlantic hosing of
1 Sv, with no indication of a full collapse. Contrastingly, the Southern
Ocean Meridional Overturning (SOMOC, defined as the minimum of the stream
function south of 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) shows very little change during the 500 years of hosing but increases in strength afterwards by up to 4 Sv for about 500 years before stabilizing again at the steady-state strength.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e812">Zonally integrated AMOC <bold>(a, c, e)</bold> and PMOC <bold>(b, d, f)</bold> stream
functions at different points in time during freshwater hosing of 0.2 Sv, as
applied in Fig. 1 (orange line) for PI_CTRL. <bold>(a, b)</bold> Steady-state circulations at time zero of Fig. 1. <bold>(c, d)</bold> Stream functions at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years, which is 200 years into the freshwater hosing. <bold>(e, f)</bold> Stream functions at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1700</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years, which is 200 years after the freshwater hosing ended. Positive and negative values correspond to clockwise and anticlockwise circulation, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/615/2021/cp-17-615-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>AMOC under increasingly realistic glacial boundary conditions</title>
      <p id="d1e869">Radiative forcing corresponding to lower greenhouse gas concentrations and
orbital parameters adjusted to 20 kyr BP with all other boundary conditions
kept at PI levels (i.e., simulation LGM_CTRL) produce an AMOC of
15.8 Sv – about 2 Sv weaker than PI_CTRL (Fig. 3) – and a PMOC
of 15.6 Sv – slightly stronger than PI_CTRL. This minor AMOC
weakening has relatively little impact on the ideal water age distribution
in the Atlantic with both PI_CTRL and LGM_CTRL
exhibiting deep-water ages in the North Atlantic of up to 800 years (Fig. B3; global average of 570 years for LGM_CTRL, Table A1). A
more sluggish AMOC is also indicated by nutrient-based reconstructions of
the Atlantic circulation during the LGM (e.g., Curry and Oppo, 2005;
Lynch-Stieglitz et al., 2007). However, these reconstructions indicate a
much older deep ocean as well as substantial shoaling of the AMOC by up to
1000 m in the North Atlantic, which is not simulated here with virtually no
shift in the water depth of the upper circulation cell and only a minor
change in ideal ventilation age.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e874"><bold>(a)</bold> Zonally integrated overturning stream function of
LGM_CTRL (AMOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv) and <bold>(b)</bold> difference to the
PI_CTRL depicted in Fig. 2a. <bold>(c, d)</bold> LGM with closed Bering
Strait (18.1 Sv) and difference to LGM_CTRL depicted in panel <bold>(a)</bold>. <bold>(e, f)</bold> LGM with closed Bering Strait and LGM wind stress (19.5 Sv). <bold>(g, h)</bold> LGM with closed Bering Strait, LGM wind stress, and increased diapycnal diffusivity due to lower sea level (21.3 Sv). See Sect. 3 and Table 1 for details on simulations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/615/2021/cp-17-615-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e911">Closing the Bering Strait under the LGM boundary conditions described above
(simulation LGM_BS) increases the AMOC strength by 2.3 Sv in
comparison with LGM_CTRL by cutting the inflow of relatively
fresh water from the North Pacific to the Arctic and subsequently to the
deep-water formation zones of the North Atlantic. As such, the closure of
the Bering Strait produces an AMOC of 18.1 Sv (slightly stronger
than PI_CTRL) with major increases below 1000 m water depth
(Fig. 3b, d), at the same time also increasing the PMOC to about 16.2 Sv.
This strengthening also deepens the AMOC by about 500 m in comparison with
LGM_CTRL, contrasting the notion of a shoaled glacial AMOC
suggested by nutrient-based proxy reconstructions. The combination of both
the strengthening and deepening leads to better<?pagebreak page619?> ventilation of the deep
North Atlantic compared with LGM_CTRL, yielding ideal water ages
between 400 and 500 years as well as a global average ideal water age of 555 years (Fig. B3).</p>
      <p id="d1e915">In a next step, adding the PMIP3 LGM wind stress anomalies to the PI wind
field (simulation LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind) further increases the
circulation strength of the AMOC and PMOC by an additional 1.4 and 1.7 Sv,
yielding a total of 19.5 and 17.9 Sv, respectively. This also further
deepens the AMOC by about 1000 m, now reaching down to the ocean bottom at
5000 m in the northern North Atlantic. As a consequence, ideal water ages
are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years in the deep North Atlantic and 400–500 years in the
deep South Atlantic, while the global average is about 30 years younger than
in LGM_CTRL. The stronger and southward-shifted Northern
hemispheric westerlies of the LGM, caused by the large continental
ice sheets, increase the strength of the subpolar and subtropical gyres.
This, in turn, enhances the northward salt flux to the northern North Atlantic,
subsequently intensifying deep-water formation (Muglia and Schmittner,
2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e935">Finally, we also consider the effect of lower glacial sea level shifting
tidal dissipation from the continental shelves to the deep ocean. Here, this
is parameterized by replacing the diapycnal diffusivity of the Bern3D model
with those derived from the UVic ocean model coupled to the OTIS tide
model (Wilmes et al., 2019), i.e., simulation LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal. This produces an even stronger and slightly deeper AMOC
(21.3 Sv) and PMOC (18.0 Sv) than LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind. In order to
verify that these changes are not related to the different parameterizations,
we also performed an additional experiment for the preindustrial where we
replaced the globally uniform diapycnal diffusivity of the Bern3D model with
the 3D UVic-OTIS model results for present-day tides (Wilmes et al., 2019),
while keeping all other parameters as in PI_CTRL (Fig. B4).
With the replaced diapycnal diffusivities, the PI AMOC strength is slightly
reduced by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv and only slightly shallower than
in PI_CTRL; hence, the observed changes in
LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal cannot be attributed to the different
parameterizations. Instead, these effects can be related to the elevated
tidal dissipation increasing the downward mixing of northern-sourced water
as well as promoting mixing between NADW and AABW (Wilmes et al., 2019).
This<?pagebreak page620?> also slightly increases deep Atlantic (and Pacific) ventilation,
yielding a global mean ideal water age of 490 years – about 80 years
younger than LGM_CTRL. In summary, these arguably more realistic
LGM boundary conditions produce an AMOC that is about 20 % stronger and
more than 1500 m deeper than PI_CTRL. Hence, these results are
in relatively good agreement with the PMIP3 LGM simulations, yielding an
average increase in AMOC of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and an average deepening of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">665</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m (Muglia and Schmittner, 2015).</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page621?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>LGM freshwater hosing experiments and AMOC hysteresis</title>
      <p id="d1e1016">The various LGM configurations are expected to have different stability
properties with respect to freshwater perturbations. In order to illustrate
this, we apply freshwater discharge (hosing) to the North Atlantic, which
leads to different responses of the AMOC in the different LGM model
configurations (Fig. 4). First, we compare the different LGM configurations
for a freshwater hosing of 0.2 Sv for 500 years (Fig. 4a). In simulations
with an open Bering Strait (PI_CTRL and LGM_CTRL) the hosing reduces the AMOC strength by about 12 Sv, whereas a reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv is observed for the LGM simulations with a closed Bering Strait. The physical origin of this difference lies in the freshwater balance in the North Atlantic. An open Bering Strait acts as a buffer that
provides relatively salty Pacific water (relative to the hosing
perturbation) to the North Atlantic during hosing when the Arctic and North
Atlantic sea surface salinity is decreased, essentially diminishing the
impact of the freshwater discharge. When the Bering Strait is closed, this
buffer is absent and freshwater accumulates more easily in the North
Atlantic during hosing. This increases upper-ocean stratification and, thus,
prevents deep-water formation more effectively. However, large freshwater
perturbations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv overwhelm this buffering process, and a
collapsed circulation state with a residual circulation of about 2 Sv is
approached regardless of the configuration (Fig. 4b). Recovery of the
circulation also varies substantially between the configurations with fast
recoveries within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years for PI_CTRL, LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind, and LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal, whereas the steady-state circulation is reached again only after 300 and 500 years for LGM_BS and LGM_CTRL, respectively. These recoveries are characterized by AMOC overshoots that also greatly vary in magnitude from 2 Sv for LGM_CTRL to 9 Sv for LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal. Overall, the magnitude of the overshoots correlates well with the steady-state AMOC strength of the respective configuration.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1087"><bold>(a)</bold> AMOC responses to freshwater perturbation of 0.2 Sv
for 500 years in the North Atlantic for the different simulations listed in
Table 1. Vertical dashed lines mark the start and end of hosing. To compare
the AMOC anomalies, the steady-state AMOC strength (AMOC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) has been subtracted from the AMOC signal. <bold>(b)</bold> The 500-year average of AMOC strength during the freshwater perturbation (AMOC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus the amount of freshwater hosing.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/615/2021/cp-17-615-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1119">These different responses to freshwater are also reflected in the structure
of the AMOC hysteresis, which was assessed by applying a freshwater forcing
to the North Atlantic between 45 and 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N linearly increasing at a rate of 0.1 Sv kyr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5). After reaching a maximum freshwater flux of 1 Sv the forcing was gradually decreased to zero at the same rate. This small rate allows the AMOC to adjust to the freshwater flux
and reach a quasi-equilibrium. Both PI_CTRL and
LGM_CTRL simulations with an open Bering Strait exhibit
relatively little hysteresis, due to a smaller North Atlantic salt anomaly.
A collapsed state is reached for both of these simulations for a hosing of
about 0.23 Sv, and recovery starts below 0.15 Sv. In fully coupled
atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) this negative feedback
of the Bering Strait emerges from the difference in sea level between the
North Pacific and Arctic that reverses during freshwater hosing, i.e.,
export from the Arctic to the North Pacific during hosing in contrast to an
import during steady state (Hu et al., 2012). The Bern3D model has a
rigid-lid ocean, and the Bering Strait throughflow is always into the Arctic.
However, both effects (freshwater export to the Pacific in AOGCMs and import of
relatively saltier water from the Pacific in the Bern3D model) reduce the
North Atlantic salt anomaly during freshwater hosing, reducing the AMOC
hysteresis. With a closed Bering Strait in simulation LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal, the AMOC responds to a freshwater forcing with a two-step reduction on top of the continuous decrease. The first accelerated reduction occurs at 0.08 Sv hosing, followed by a second steep decline in AMOC strength at 0.25 Sv of freshwater discharge leading towards a full collapse of the circulation. After that, the AMOC stays in the collapsed state for more than 16 kyr and only recovers when the hosing decreases below 0.08 Sv, followed by an overshoot reaching a circulation of more than 25 Sv until it returns to its initial steady state. These structures are reminiscent of the hysteresis behavior of simple box models and theoretical considerations, which are driven by Stommel's salt advection feedback (Fig. 5a; Rahmstorf et
al., 2005; Stocker and Wright, 1991; Stommel, 1961). The stronger hysteresis
of LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal can be traced back to the increased
freshwater accumulation in the North Atlantic due to the closed Bering
Strait (cf. Hu et al., 2012). Once collapsed, the circulation is unable to
efficiently export the freshwater anomaly elsewhere. Thus, the restart of
the AMOC is delayed, as the only North Atlantic source of salt is via the
subpolar gyre. As such, this larger AMOC hysteresis supports the notion that
the closure of the Bering Strait played a central role for the abrupt
climate transitions during the last glacial such as Dansgaard–Oeschger
events (Hu et al., 2012).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1175"><bold>(a)</bold> Schematic hysteresis structure of the AMOC with bifurcation points (red circles; Stommel, 1961). <bold>(b)</bold> Hysteresis diagram for
PI control (blue), LGM control (black), and most realistic LGM boundary
conditions (red; LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal). Here, the freshwater
was linearly increased up to 1.0 Sv over a period of 10 kyr and then
decreased back to zero over 10 kyr.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/615/2021/cp-17-615-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Effect of AMOC strength on freshwater response</title>
      <p id="d1e1211">Proxy reconstructions of the LGM AMOC strength are strongly diverging, with
some studies indicating a more vigorous but shallow circulation (Bradtmiller et al., 2014; Lippold et al., 2012) and others suggesting a more sluggish circulation (Curry and Oppo, 2005; Evans and Hall, 2008; Lynch-Stieglitz et al., 2007). However,
the model simulations presented here as well as PMIP3 results indicate a
stronger and deeper Atlantic circulation in conflict with these proxy
reconstructions. In order to also explore the responses of potentially weak
glacial AMOC states to freshwater perturbations, we continuously apply
constant North Pacific to North Atlantic freshwater transfer fluxes (i.e.,
we add small freshwater fluxes to the North Atlantic that are compensated
for by salt addition to the North Pacific, thereby not changing the global
salt inventory). All other boundary conditions are as in LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal, which we consider the configuration closest to the actual LGM boundary conditions. We let these simulations run into a new equilibrium
over 5000 years before any further experiments are started. This yields
reduced<?pagebreak page622?> steady-state AMOC strengths from 20.4 to 12.3 Sv (freshwater
transfer between 0.02 and 0.12 Sv; Fig. 6, Table 2). These freshwater adjustments,
mimicking increased background runoff from the continental ice sheets and
changes in evaporation and precipitation, lead to substantial shoaling of
the AMOC due to increased upper-ocean stratification (Fig. B5). However, the
shoaling does not extend beyond the PI_CTRL AMOC depth even
for the weakest AMOC state produced by a freshwater transfer flux of 0.12 Sv. Further, despite the decrease in AMOC strength of 9 Sv (and 2.8 Sv for PMOC) between these simulations, the impact on ventilation ages is relatively minor with an increase of only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years yielding
a global mean of 520 years for the simulation with the weakest AMOC compared
with LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal, which is still about 80 years
younger than PI_CTRL.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1254">Sensitivity of weakened AMOC states of LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal boundary conditions to freshwater perturbations of 0.2 Sv over 500 years. In order to reduce the AMOC strength Pacific to Atlantic freshwater transfer fluxes of 0.02 to 0.12 Sv were applied to the North Atlantic, which were compensated for in the North Pacific (Fig. B1).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/615/2021/cp-17-615-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1280">Atlantic, Pacific, and Southern Ocean meridional overturning rates (AMOC, PMOC, and SOMOC, respectively), global mean atmospheric surface temperature, mean ocean temperature, and sea ice extent of the Northern and Southern hemispheres (NH and SH, respectively) of all simulations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Run</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AMOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PMOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SOMOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mean atmospheric</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mean ocean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Sea ice</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(Sv)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(Sv)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(Sv)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">surface temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">area, NH/SH</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PI_CTRL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10.9/14.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGM_CTRL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16.3/24.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGM_BS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15.3/25.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">14.5/25.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">14.5/23.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Adj <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">14.5/23.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Adj <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">14.6/23.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Adj <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15.3/22.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Adj <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15.5/22.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Adj <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15.6/23.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Adj <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15.8/23.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1775">Hosing these weakened AMOC states with 0.2 Sv freshwater for 500 years
decreases the minimum AMOC strength during the perturbation with increasing
freshwater adjustments (Fig. 6). Simulations with a steady-state AMOC larger
than 15 Sv recover to their initial state, but the recovery time increases
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years for the smallest freshwater adjustment to about 1000 years for an adjustment of 0.08 Sv after the perturbation. This
indicates that the AMOC is more sensitive to freshwater perturbations in the LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal model configuration, with decreasing overturning strength corroborating the findings of Goes et al. (2019). Indeed, for an even larger Pacific to Atlantic freshwater adjustment leading to an AMOC strength of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv (Adj <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv), the freshwater hosing of 0.2 Sv causes a total collapse of the circulation,
which does not recover after the freshwater hosing. This demonstrates
bistability under these conditions and, hence, a completely different response
to perturbations.</p>
      <p id="d1e1822">Overall, this bistable behavior is present in all LGM model configurations
(Fig. 7), but the transition from mono- to bistability (red regimes) is more
abrupt for LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind and particularly LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal. In both of these LGM configurations, the AMOC either recovers relatively<?pagebreak page623?> quickly or collapses completely. In contrast, in LGM_CTRL and LGM_BS, the AMOC requires up to 2800 years to recover without fully collapsing for weak AMOC steady states
and large freshwater forcings. This highlights that the LGM wind stress
anomalies and elevated vertical mixing are the driving processes leading to
this abrupt behavior between either fast recovery or full collapse.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1848">Dependency of AMOC recovery time on steady-state circulation strength (AMOC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and freshwater hosing amplitude. Model configurations of <bold>(a)</bold> LGM_CTRL, <bold>(b)</bold> LGM_BS, <bold>(c)</bold> LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind, and <bold>(d)</bold> LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal. The simulations are indicated by gray dots. The AMOC was weakened by applying a continuous freshwater transfer flux from the North Pacific to the North Atlantic that shifts the steady state into a new equilibrium (same as for Fig. 6). Freshwater hosing applied to the North Atlantic (45–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) lasted for 500 years. The recovery time was calculated as the time after the hosing until the steady-state AMOC strength was reached again. Red areas mark simulations where the AMOC remained in the collapsed state after the freshwater perturbation with no indication of recovery. Note the different scales on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/615/2021/cp-17-615-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Transient opening of the Bering Strait</title>
      <p id="d1e1925">Finally, we provide a first glance of the effect of transient changes in the
state configuration of the Bern3D model. After massive continental ice sheet
melt during the last deglaciation, sea level rose rapidly first reconnecting
the North Pacific with the Arctic during the Younger Dryas cold event (Pico
et al., 2020). Here, we simulate the opening of the Bering Strait in a
transient simulation under glacial boundary conditions (i.e.,
LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal; Fig. 8). Results of this simulation
should be taken with caution and can only describe first-order consequences
of the late deglacial Bering Strait opening, as the boundary conditions
used here have limited validity for that time. More realistic transient
boundary conditions of the late deglaciation are desirable, but the complex
interactions between the effects of the retreating continental ice sheets
with ocean circulation (freshwater fluxes, changes in the wind field,
differences in tidal dissipation due to sea level rise) and the consequent
transient changes are difficult to constrain and beyond the scope of this
study.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e1944"><bold>(a)</bold> Evolution of mean Arctic salinity (integrated over all water depths) and <bold>(b)</bold> AMOC strength with opening of the Bering Strait at
year 1000. The mean meridional advection through the Bering Strait is 0.5 Sv.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/615/2021/cp-17-615-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1958">The opening of the Bering Strait rapidly decreases the mean Arctic salinity
(integrated over all depths) due to the inflow of relatively fresh Pacific
surface water (Figs. 8a, B7). Subsequently, the salinity slightly recovers
after <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years reaching a new steady state after <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">800</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years that is about 0.05 psu less saline. This negative salt anomaly also propagates to the North Atlantic somewhat disrupting deep-water formation and reducing the AMOC by about 1 Sv (Fig. 8b). The evolution of the AMOC is similar to the mean Arctic salinity, yet the recovery to the new steady state only takes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years. This new steady state after the opening of the Bering Strait exhibits an AMOC that is stronger than that of the steady state with an open Bering Strait (Fig. B7). Further, the AMOC variability increases significantly after the Bering Strait opening
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from 800 to 1000 years) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv
(1800–2000 years). Overall, the opening has relatively little impact on the
sea surface salinity of the North Atlantic (Fig. B7) and, thus, on the AMOC
strength in the Bern3D model under LGM boundary conditions. Consequently,
this simulation suggests that the considerable climate and AMOC
reorganizations found by proxy<?pagebreak page624?> reconstructions for the late deglaciation
(Denton et al., 2010; McManus et al., 2004) require further forcing
mechanisms such as freshwater fluxes from the decaying Laurentide and
Fennoscandian ice sheets (Condron and Winsor, 2012; Keigwin et al., 2018;
Renssen et al., 2015).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion and conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e2028">Despite decades of research, large uncertainties remain regarding the overall geometry and strength of the AMOC during the LGM (Lynch-Stieglitz, 2017). In conflict with proxy<?pagebreak page625?> reconstructions, PMIP3 model simulations consistently indicate a stronger and deeper AMOC under LGM boundary conditions than under PI conditions (Muglia and Schmittner, 2015). Here, we confirm these results of the PMIP3 simulations with the Bern3D model, indicating that three major differences in the boundary conditions between the LGM and the PI period even overcompensate for the
AMOC weakening associated with the lower glacial temperatures such that the
resulting LGM state exhibits a stronger AMOC than the PI period. The closure of the
Bering Strait and wind stress anomalies are often considered in LGM model
runs, but changes in tidal dissipation are neglected in most studies. Our
simulations emphasize that all of these processes have a substantial impact on
the ocean circulation, here leading to a total increase in AMOC strength of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv; therefore, all of the processes need to be considered for
paleoclimate model simulations. When investigating abrupt climate
transitions during the last glacial, it is particularly important to
consider the interaction between the North Pacific and Arctic. Closing the
Bering Strait increases the sensitivity of the AMOC to freshwater
perturbations by preventing the negative feedback of salt and freshwater export
through the Bering Strait (Hu et al., 2012). Thus, it is also important to
investigate the impact of transient changes in the state of the Bering
Strait, which could act as possible triggers for abrupt climate changes.</p>
      <p id="d1e2041">A counteracting effect to the AMOC strengthening due to the Bering Strait
closure, increased wind stress, and elevated tidal dissipation during the
LGM is the potentially increased runoff from the continental ice sheets
surrounding the North Atlantic or changes in the hydrological cycle that are
not explicitly implemented here. Our simulations indicate that such an
additional freshwater flux implemented here as a North Pacific to Atlantic
transfer flux could have substantially weakened and shoaled the AMOC. However,
even for large freshwater relocations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv), the AMOC does
not substantially shoal beyond the PI AMOC depth in the Bern3D model. The
strongly increased vertical mixing due to higher tidal dissipation, often
neglected in climate simulations, and the elevated North Atlantic wind stress
counterbalance the increased stratification due to the freshwater transfer
flux (Fig. B5; Wilmes et al., 2019). Therefore, the simulations presented
here suggest that the LGM AMOC did not shoal to the extent previously
inferred from nutrient-based proxies (virtually no shoaling simulated here
versus about 1 km as inferred previously by Curry and Oppo, 2005, and
Lynch-Stieglitz et al., 2007). While we note that this conclusion may be
model specific, it is in line with revised interpretations of the updated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data in follow-up studies (Oppo et al., 2018; Keigwin and
Swift, 2017). Furthermore, in our model, an AMOC weakening is always
accompanied by an AMOC shoaling and vice versa, and no circulation is found
here that produces a strong and shallow AMOC as initially suggested by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">231</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">230</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reconstruction (Bradtmiller et al., 2014; Lippold et
al., 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e2086"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>While the work presented here suggests that some proposed LGM circulation
regimes seem to be difficult to realize, further constraints from proxy
reconstructions are required to reduce uncertainties and, thus, better
determine the LGM AMOC state. With the present study, we have established a
consistent model framework with easily tunable circulation strength that
will facilitate comprehensive model–data intercomparisons with geochemical
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Nd isotopes) and nutrient-based (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) circulation proxies implemented in the Bern3D model in the future.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<?pagebreak page626?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title>Ideal ages</title>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Ideal ages for different simulations</title>
      <p id="d1e2146">We diagnosed the mean ideal ages for the global ocean as well as for the
different subbasins below 2 km water depth (Table A1). These ages measure
the true model ocean ventilation and, thus, cannot be directly compared to
radiocarbon ventilation ages, which exhibit a preformed surface age due to
not fully equilibrating at the ocean–atmosphere interface, sea ice
prohibiting air–sea gas exchange, and carbon-cycle-related changes.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.S1.T3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><label>Table A1</label><caption><p id="d1e2152">Mean ideal water ages for the global ocean and for the
different basins below 2 km water depth.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.80}[.80]?><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Run</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Global</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Atlantic,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Pacific,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Indian,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Southern</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Ocean,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(year)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(year)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(year)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(year)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(year)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PI_CTRL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">614</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">479</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">758</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">529</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGM_CTRL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">570</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">483</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">943</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">635</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">403</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGM_BS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">555</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">338</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">939</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">594</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">396</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">526</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">211</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">908</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">567</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">396</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">488</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">178</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">870</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">542</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">374</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Adj <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">490</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">186</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">869</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">549</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">373</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Adj <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">491</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">866</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">557</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">371</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Adj <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">513</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">297</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">887</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">603</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">396</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Adj <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">514</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">331</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">886</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">609</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">394</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Adj <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">514</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">369</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">883</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">612</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">390</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Adj <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">518</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">457</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">879</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">625</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">388</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{B}?><label>Appendix B</label><title>Figures</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B1</label><caption><p id="d1e2633">Map depicting regions where freshwater and saltwater perturbations are applied. For the hosing experiments, the freshwater was evenly applied to the North Atlantic (orange). In order to achieve weakened LGM AMOC states, small freshwater fluxes were added to the North Atlantic (orange) and compensated for in the North Pacific (red) by adding the equivalent salt flux to that region.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=221.931496pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/615/2021/cp-17-615-2021-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B2</label><caption><p id="d1e2644">Additional changes in LGM boundary conditions. <bold>(a, b)</bold> Multi-model mean wind stress anomalies of five PMIP3 models (CCSM4, CNRM,
GISS, MIROC, and MPI) following Muglia and Schmittner (2015). The large
positive anomaly south of Australia is a regridding artifact due to the lack
of Tasmania in the Bern3D model. <bold>(c)</bold> Zonally averaged diapycnal
diffusivities of the Atlantic, which are regridded on the Bern3D grid from
the UVic climate model coupled to the OTIS tide model with sea level derived
from ICE-6G (Wilmes et al., 2019).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/615/2021/cp-17-615-2021-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B3</label><caption><p id="d1e2662">Zonally averaged ideal water ages of the Atlantic for the different model configurations listed in Table 1. Ideal ages are set to zero at the surface and increase in the ocean interior at a rate of 1 yr yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/615/2021/cp-17-615-2021-f11.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B4</label><caption><p id="d1e2686"><bold>(a)</bold> Stream function for model run with the globally uniform diapycnal diffusivity of PI_CTRL replaced with the 3D diapycnal diffusivity field of the UVic-OTIS model with present-day tides (Wilmes et al., 2019). Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows panel <bold>(a)</bold> minus the PI_CTRL simulation. The AMOC strength is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv weaker and slightly shallower in the simulation with the 3D diapycnal diffusivity field of the UVic-OTIS model. Contour level steps are 1 Sv.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/615/2021/cp-17-615-2021-f12.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B5</label><caption><p id="d1e2715">(Left) Zonally integrated Atlantic stream functions with
all LGM forcing changes (simulation LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal)
but freshwater adjustment of 0.04 Sv to 0.12 Sv between the North Pacific
and North Atlantic (cf. Fig. 6). The regions of the freshwater flux and
the associated salt compensation are marked in Fig. B1. (Right) Zonally averaged
ideal water age in the Atlantic. Ideal ages are set to zero at the surface
and increase in the ocean interior at a rate of 1 yr yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/615/2021/cp-17-615-2021-f13.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F14" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B6</label><caption><p id="d1e2754">Atlantic stream functions for LGM boundary conditions
with <bold>(a)</bold> closed Bering Strait and consideration of increased tidal
dissipation after Wilmes et al. (2019) and <bold>(b)</bold> added LGM wind stress
anomalies from PMIP3 models (Muglia and Schmittner, 2015) and increased
tidal dissipation.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/615/2021/cp-17-615-2021-f14.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F15" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B7</label><caption><p id="d1e2771">Annual mean sea surface temperature (SST), sea surface salinity (SSS), and fractional sea ice north of 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N under LGM boundary conditions. <bold>(a, b, c)</bold> Closed Bering Strait (simulation LGM_BS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>wind<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>tidal), <bold>(d, e, f)</bold> the new steady state after transiently opening the Bering Strait but all other boundary conditions as in the top row, and <bold>(g, h, i)</bold> the difference between open and closed Bering Strait.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/615/2021/cp-17-615-2021-f15.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2819">Simulation outputs used for this study
are available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4436092" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4436092</ext-link> (Pöppelmeier et al., 2021) or upon request from the corresponding author (frerk.poeppelmeier@climate.unibe.ch).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2828">FP and TFS designed the study. FP
developed and performed the model simulations with help from AJT and JS.
FP wrote the initial paper with contributions from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2834">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e2840">The work reflects only the authors' view; the European Commission and their executive agency are not responsible for any use that may be made of the information that the work contains.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2846">Calculations were performed on UBELIX, the high-performance computing cluster at the University of Bern. This is TiPES contribution no. 45. The authors are grateful to Fortunat Joos for fruitful discussions and to the two anonymous reviewers for particularly helpful comments.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2851">This research has been supported by the European Union Horizon 2020 program (COMFORT (grant no. 820989) and TiPES (grant no. 820970)) and the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (grant nos. 200020-172745 and 200020-172476).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2857">This paper was edited by Qiuzhen Yin and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Barker, S., Chen, J., Gong, X., Jonkers, L., Knorr, G., and Thornalley, D.:
Icebergs not the trigger for North Atlantic cold events, Nature, 520,
333–336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14330" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature14330</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Berger, A. L.: Long-Term Variations of Daily Insolation and Quaternary
Climatic Changes, J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 2362–2367,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035&lt;2362:LTVODI&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035&lt;2362:LTVODI&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Böhm, E., Lippold, J., Gutjahr, M., Frank, M., Blaser, P., Antz, B.,
Fohlmeister, J., Frank, N., Andersen, M. B., and Deininger, M.: Strong and
deep Atlantic meridional overturning circulation during the last glacial
cycle, Nature, 517, 73–76, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature14059</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Kageyama, M., Bartlein, P. J.,
Masson-Delmotte, V., Abe-Ouchi, A., Otto-Bliesner, B., and Zhao, Y.:
Evaluation of climate models using palaeoclimatic data, Nat. Clim. Change,
2, 417–424, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1456" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate1456</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bradtmiller, L. I., McManus, J. F., and Robinson, L. F.:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">231</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pa/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">230</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th evidence for a weakened but persistent Atlantic
meridional overturning circulation during Heinrich Stadial 1, Nat. Commun.,
5, 5817, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6817" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms6817</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Broecker, W., Bond, G., Klas, M., Clark, E., and McManus, J.: Origin of the
northern Atlantic's Heinrich events, Clim. Dynam., 6, 265–273,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00193540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00193540</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Broecker, W. S. and Denton, G. H.: The role of ocean-atmosphere
reorganizations in glacial cycles, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 53,
2465–2501, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(89)90123-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(89)90123-3</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Clark, P. U., Marshall, S. J., Clarke, G. K. C., Hostetler, S. W.,
Licciardi, J. M., and Teller, J. T.: Freshwater forcing of abrupt climate
change during the last glaciation, Science, 293, 283–287,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062517" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1062517</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Condron, A. and Winsor, P.: Meltwater routing and the Younger Dryas, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 19928–19933,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207381109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1207381109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Curry, W. B. and Oppo, D. W.: Glacial water mass geometry and the
distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the western
Atlantic Ocean, Paleoceanography, 20, 1–12,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004PA001021</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Denton, G. H., Anderson, R. F., Toggweiler, J. R., Edwards, R. L., Schaefer,
J. M., and Putnam, A. E.: The last glacial termination, Science, 328,
1652–1656, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1184119" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1184119</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Driesschaert, E., Fichefet, T., Goosse, H., Huybrechts, P., Janssens, I.,
Mouchet, A., Munhoven, G., Brovkin, V., and Weber, S. L.: Modeling the
influence of Greenland ice sheet melting on the Atlantic meridional
overturning circulation during the next millennia, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
34, 1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029516" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL029516</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Du, J., Haley, B. A., and Mix, A. C.: Evolution of the Global Overturning
Circulation since the Last Glacial Maximum based on marine authigenic
neodymium isotopes, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 241, 106396,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106396" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106396</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Duplessy, J. C., Shackleton, N. J., Fairbanks, R. G., Labeyriefi, L., Oppo,
D., Labeyrie, L., Oppo, D., and Kallel, N.: Deepwater source variations
during the last climatic cylce and their impact on the global deepwater
circulation, Paleoceanography, 3, 343–360,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/PA003i003p00343" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/PA003i003p00343</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Edwards, N. R., Willmott, A. J., and Killworth, P. D.: On the role of
topography and wind stress on the stability of the thermohaline circulation,
J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 756–778,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0756:OTROTA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0756:OTROTA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Egbert, G. D., Ray, R. D., and Bills, B. G.: Numerical modeling of the
global semidiurnal tide in the present day and in the last glacial maximum,
J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 109, 1–15,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jc001973" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jc001973</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Evans, H. K. and Hall, I. R.: Deepwater circulation on Blake Outer Ridge
(western North Atlantic) during the Holocene, Younger Dryas, and Last
Glacial Maximum, Geochem. Geophy. Geosyst., 9, 1–19,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001771" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GC001771</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fischer, H., Schmitt, J., Lüthi, D., Stocker, T. F., Tschumi, T.,
Parekh, P., Joos, F., Köhler, P., Völker, C., Gersonde<?pagebreak page631?>, R.,
Barbante, C., Le Floch, M., Raynaud, D., and Wolff, E.: The role of
Southern Ocean processes in orbital and millennial CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variations – A
synthesis, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 29, 193–205,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.06.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.06.007</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Freeman, E., Skinner, L. C., Waelbroeck, C., and Hodell, D.: Radiocarbon
evidence for enhanced respired carbon storage in the Atlantic at the Last
Glacial Maximum, Nat. Commun., 7, 1–8,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11998" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms11998</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gebbie, G.: How much did Glacial North Atlantic Water shoal?,
Paleoceanography, 29, 190–209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013PA002557" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013PA002557</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Goes, M., Murphy, L. N., and Clement, A. C.: The Stability of the AMOC
During Heinrich Events Is Not Dependent on the AMOC Strength in an
Intermediate Complexity Earth System Model Ensemble, Paleoceanogr.
Paleoclimatol., 34, 1359–1374, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003580" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019PA003580</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Griffies, S. M.: The Gent–McWilliams Skew Flux, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28,
831–841, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0831:TGMSF&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0831:TGMSF&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hesse, T., Butzin, M., Bickert, T., and Lohmann, G.: A model-data
comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the glacial Atlantic Ocean,
Paleoceanography, 26, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010PA002085" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010PA002085</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Howe, J. N. W., Piotrowski, A. M., Noble, T. L., Mulitza, S., Chiessi, C.
M., and Bayon, G.: North Atlantic Deep Water Production during the Last
Glacial Maximum, Nat. Commun., 7, 11765,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11765" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms11765</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, A., Meehl, G. A., Han, W., Timmermann, A., Otto-Bliesner, B., Liu, Z.,
Washington, W. M., Large, W., Abe-Ouchi, A., Kimoto, M., Lambeck, K., and
Wu, B.: Role of the Bering Strait on the hysteresis of the ocean conveyor
belt circulation and glacial climate stability, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 109, 6417–6422, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116014109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1116014109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jenkins, W. J., Smethie, W. M., Boyle, E. A., and Cutter, G. A.: Water mass
analysis for the U.S. GEOTRACES (GA03) North Atlantic sections, Deep Sea
Res., 116, 6–20,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.11.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.11.018</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Wollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M.,
Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang,
J., Leetmaa, A., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis
Project. B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–472,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Keigwin, L. D. and Swift, S. A.: Carbon isotope evidence for a northern
source of deep water in the glacial western North Atlantic, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 2831–2835,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614693114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1614693114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Keigwin, L. D., Klotsko, S., Zhao, N., Reilly, B., Giosan, L., and
Driscoll, N. W.: Deglacial floods in the Beaufort Sea preceded Younger Dryas
cooling, Nat. Geosci., 11, 599–604,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0169-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-018-0169-6</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lambeck, K., Rouby, H., Purcell, A., Sun, Y., and Sambridge, M.: Sea level
and global ice volumes from the Last Glacial Maximum to the Holocene, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 15296–15303,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411762111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1411762111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lehman, S. J. and Keigwin, L. D.: Sudden changes in North Atlantic
circulation during the last deglaciation, Nature, 356, 757–762,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/356757a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/356757a0</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lenton, T. M., Held, H., Kriegler, E., Hall, J. W., Lucht, W., Rahmstrof,
S., and Schellnhuber, H. J.: Tipping elements in the Earth System, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 1786–1793,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911106106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0911106106</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lippold, J., Luo, Y., Francois, R., Allen, S. E., Gherardi, J., Pichat, S.,
Hickey, B., and Schulz, H.: Strength and geometry of the glacial Atlantic
Meridional Overturning Circulation, Nat. Geosci., 5, 813–816,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1608" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1608</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lynch-Stieglitz, J.: The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation and
Abrupt Climate Change, Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci., 9, 83–104,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060415" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060415</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lynch-Stieglitz, J., Adkins, J. F., Curry, W. B., Dokken, T., Hall, I. R.,
Herguera, J. C., Hirschi, J. J. M., Ivanova, E. V., Kissel, C., Marchal, O.,
Marchitto, T. M., McCave, I. N., McManus, J. F., Mulitza, S., Ninnemann, U.,
Peeters, F., Yu, E. F., and Zahn, R.: Atlantic meridional overturning
circulation during the last glacial maximum, Science, 316, 66–69,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137127" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1137127</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McCarthy, G. D., Smeed, D. A., Johns, W. E., Frajka-Williams, E., Moat, B.
I., Rayner, D., Baringer, M. O., Meinen, C. S., Collins, J., and Bryden, H.
L.: Measuring the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation at
26<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N, Prog. Oceanogr., 130, 91–111,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.10.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2014.10.006</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McManus, J. F., Francois, R., Gherardl, J. M., Kelgwin, L., and
Drown-Leger, S.: Collapse and rapid resumption of Atlantic meridional
circulation linked to deglacial climate changes, Nature, 428,
834–837, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02494" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature02494</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Menviel, L., Yu, J., Joos, F., Mouchet, A., Meissner, K. J., and England,
M. H.: Poorly ventilated deep ocean at the Last Glacial Maximum inferred
from carbon isotopes: A data-model comparison study, Paleoceanography,
32, 2–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA003024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016PA003024</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Menviel, L. C., Spence, P., Skinner, L. C., Tachikawa, K., Friedrich, T.,
Missiaen, L., and Yu, J.: Enhanced mid-depth southward transport in the
Northeast Atlantic at the Last Glacial Maximum despite a weaker AMOC,
Paleoceanog. Paleoclimatol., 35, e2019PA003793,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003793" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019PA003793</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Monnin, E., Indermühle, A., Dällenbach, A., Flückiger, J.,
Stauffer, B., Stocker, T. F., Raynaud, D., and Barnola, J. M.: Atmospheric
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations over the last glacial termination, Science,
291, 112–114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5501.112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.291.5501.112</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Muglia, J. and Schmittner, A.: Glacial Atlantic overturning increased by
wind stress in climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 9862–9869,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064583" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL064583</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Müller, S. A., Joos, F., Edwards, N. R., and Stocker, T. F.: Water mass
distribution and ventilation time scales in a cost-efficient, three
dimensional ocean model, J. Climate, 19, 5479–5499,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3911.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI3911.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Oppo, D. W., Curry, W. B., and McManus, J. F.: What do benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O data tell us about Atlantic circulation during Heinrich Stadial 1?,
Paleoceanography, 20, 353–368, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014PA002667" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014PA002667</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Oppo, D. W., Gebbie, G., Huang, K. F., Curry, W. B., Marchitto, T. M., and
Pietro, K. R.: Data Constraints on Glacial Atlantic Water Mass Geometry and
Properties, Paleoceanog. Paleoclimatol., 33, 1013–1034,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018PA003408" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018PA003408</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peltier, W. R.: Ice Age Paleotopography, Science, 265, 195–201,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.265.5169.195" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.265.5169.195</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page632?><ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pico, T., Mitrovica, J. X., and Mix, A. C.: Sea level fingerprinting of the
Bering Strait flooding history detects the source of the Younger Dryas
climate event, Sci. Adv., 6, eaay2935, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay2935" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aay2935</ext-link>,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pöppelmeier, F., Blaser, P., Gutjahr, M., Jaccard, S., Frank, M., Max,
L., and Lippold, J.: Northern Sourced Water dominated the Atlantic Ocean
during the Last Glacial Maximum, Geology, 48, 826–829,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G47628.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G47628.1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pöppelmeier, F., Scheen, J., Jeltsch-Thömmes, A., and Stocker, T. F.: Model output from the Bern3D model of pre-industrial and Last Glacial Maximum, Data set, Zenodo, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4436092" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4436092</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rahmstorf, S., Crucifix, M., Ganopolski, A., Goosse, H., Kamenkovich, I.,
Knutti, R., Lohmann, G., Marsh, R., Myzak, L. A., Wang, Z., and Weaver, A.
J.: Thermohaline circulation hysteresis: A model intercomparison, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 32, 1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023655" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL023655</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Renssen, H., Mairesse, A., Goosse, H., Mathiot, P., Heiri, O., Roche, D. M.,
Nisancioglu, K. H., and Valdes, P. J.: Multiple causes of the Younger Dryas
cold period, Nat. Geosci., 8, 946–949,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2557" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2557</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ritz, S. P., Stocker, T. F., and Joos, F.: A coupled dynamical ocean-energy
balance atmosphere model for paleoclimate studies, J. Climate, 24,
349–375, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3351.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2010JCLI3351.1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Roberts, W. H. G., Valdes, P. J., and Payne, A. J.: A new constraint on the
size of Heinrich Events from an iceberg/sediment model, Earth Planet. Sci.
Lett., 386, 1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.020</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Roth, R., Ritz, S. P., and Joos, F.: Burial-nutrient feedbacks amplify the sensitivity of atmospheric carbon dioxide to changes in organic matter remineralisation, Earth Syst. Dynam., 5, 321–343, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-321-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esd-5-321-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sarnthein, M., Winn, K., Jung, S., Duplessy, J. C., Labeyrie, L.,
Erlenkeuser, H., and Ganssen, G.: Changes in east Atlantic deepwater
circulation over the last 30,000 years: Eight time slice reconstructions,
Paleoceanography, 9, 209–267, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93PA03301" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93PA03301</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schmittner, A. and Egbert, G. D.: An improved parameterization of tidal mixing for ocean models, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 211–224, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-211-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-211-2014</ext-link>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Skinner, L. C., Primeau, F., Freeman, E., De La Fuente, M., Goodwin, P. A.,
Gottschalk, J., Huang, E., McCave, I. N., Noble, T. L., and Scrivner, A.
E.: Radiocarbon constraints on the glacial ocean circulation and its impact
on atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Nat. Commun., 8, 1–10,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms16010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms16010</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stocker, T. F.: Past and future reorganizations in the climate system,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 19, 301–319,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00067-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00067-0</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stocker, T. F. and Marchal, O.: Abrupt climate change in the computer: Is
it real?, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 1362–1365,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.4.1362" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.97.4.1362</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stocker, T. F. and Schmittner, A.: Influence of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission rates on
the stability of the thermohaline circulation, Nature, 388, 862–865,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/42224" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/42224</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stocker, T. F. and Wright, D. G.: Rapid transitions of the ocean's deep
circulation induced by changes in surface water fluxes, Nature, 351,
729–732, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/351729a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/351729a0</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stocker, T. F., Timmermann, A., Renold, M., and Timm, O.: Effect of salt
compensation on the climate model response in simulations of large changes
of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, J. Climate,
20, 5912–5928, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1662.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2007JCLI1662.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stommel, H.: Thermohaline Convection with Two Stable Regimes, Tellus, 13, 224–230, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1961.tb00079.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.2153-3490.1961.tb00079.x</ext-link>, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wilmes, S. B., Schmittner, A., and Green, J. A. M.: Glacial Ice Sheet
Extent Effects on Modeled Tidal Mixing and the Global Overturning
Circulation, Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol., 34, 1437–1454,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003644" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019PA003644</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Woodgate, R. A., Aagaard, K., and Weingartner, T. J.: Monthly temperature,
salinity, and transport variability of the Bering Strait through flow,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, 1–4, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021880" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL021880</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zaucker, F., Stocker, T. F., and Broecker, W. S.: Atmospheric freshwater
fluxes and their effect on the global thermohaline circulation, J. Geophys.
Res., 99, 12443–12457, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC00526" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94JC00526</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Simulated stability of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation during the Last Glacial Maximum</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The response of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning
Circulation (AMOC) to freshwater perturbations critically depends on its
mean state. Large swaths of icebergs melting in the North Atlantic during
the last deglaciation constituted such perturbations and can, thus, provide
important constraints on the stability of the AMOC. However, the mean AMOC state
during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), preceding the rapid disintegration of
the ice sheets during the deglaciation, as well as its response to these
perturbations remain debated. Here, we investigate the evolution of the AMOC as it
responds to freshwater perturbations under improved LGM boundary
conditions in the Bern3D intermediate complexity model. Particularly, we
consider the effect of an open versus a closed Bering Strait and the effect
of increased tidal dissipation as a result of the altered bathymetry due to
the lower glacial sea level stand. The vigorous and deep AMOC under these
glacial boundary conditions, consistent with previous simulations with
different models, reacts more strongly to North Atlantic freshwater forcings
than under preindustrial conditions. This increased sensitivity is mostly
related to the closed Bering Strait that cuts off the freshwater escape
route through the Arctic into the Pacific, thereby facilitating faster
accumulation of freshwater in the North Atlantic and halting deep-water
formation. Proxy reconstructions of the LGM AMOC instead indicate a weaker
and possibly shallower AMOC than today, which is in conflict with the particularly
strong and deep circulation states coherently simulated with ocean
circulation models for the LGM. Simulations with reduced North Atlantic deep-water formation, as a consequence of potentially increased continental
runoff from ice sheet melt and imposed changes in the hydrological cycle,
more closely resemble the overturning circulation inferred from proxies.
These circulation states also show bistable behavior, where the AMOC does
not recover after North Atlantic freshwater hosing. However, no AMOC states
are found here that either comprise an extreme shoaling or vigorous and
concurrent shallow overturning as previously proposed based on
paleoceanographic data.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Barker, S., Chen, J., Gong, X., Jonkers, L., Knorr, G., and Thornalley, D.:
Icebergs not the trigger for North Atlantic cold events, Nature, 520,
333–336, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14330" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14330</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Berger, A. L.: Long-Term Variations of Daily Insolation and Quaternary
Climatic Changes, J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 2362–2367,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035&lt;2362:LTVODI&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035&lt;2362:LTVODI&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Böhm, E., Lippold, J., Gutjahr, M., Frank, M., Blaser, P., Antz, B.,
Fohlmeister, J., Frank, N., Andersen, M. B., and Deininger, M.: Strong and
deep Atlantic meridional overturning circulation during the last glacial
cycle, Nature, 517, 73–76, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14059</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Kageyama, M., Bartlein, P. J.,
Masson-Delmotte, V., Abe-Ouchi, A., Otto-Bliesner, B., and Zhao, Y.:
Evaluation of climate models using palaeoclimatic data, Nat. Clim. Change,
2, 417–424, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1456" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1456</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bradtmiller, L. I., McManus, J. F., and Robinson, L. F.:
<sup>231</sup>Pa/<sup>230</sup>Th evidence for a weakened but persistent Atlantic
meridional overturning circulation during Heinrich Stadial 1, Nat. Commun.,
5, 5817, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6817" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6817</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Broecker, W., Bond, G., Klas, M., Clark, E., and McManus, J.: Origin of the
northern Atlantic's Heinrich events, Clim. Dynam., 6, 265–273,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00193540" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00193540</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Broecker, W. S. and Denton, G. H.: The role of ocean-atmosphere
reorganizations in glacial cycles, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 53,
2465–2501, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(89)90123-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(89)90123-3</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, P. U., Marshall, S. J., Clarke, G. K. C., Hostetler, S. W.,
Licciardi, J. M., and Teller, J. T.: Freshwater forcing of abrupt climate
change during the last glaciation, Science, 293, 283–287,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062517" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062517</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Condron, A. and Winsor, P.: Meltwater routing and the Younger Dryas, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 19928–19933,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207381109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207381109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Curry, W. B. and Oppo, D. W.: Glacial water mass geometry and the
distribution of <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C of ΣCO<sub>2</sub> in the western
Atlantic Ocean, Paleoceanography, 20, 1–12,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001021</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Denton, G. H., Anderson, R. F., Toggweiler, J. R., Edwards, R. L., Schaefer,
J. M., and Putnam, A. E.: The last glacial termination, Science, 328,
1652–1656, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1184119" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1184119</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Driesschaert, E., Fichefet, T., Goosse, H., Huybrechts, P., Janssens, I.,
Mouchet, A., Munhoven, G., Brovkin, V., and Weber, S. L.: Modeling the
influence of Greenland ice sheet melting on the Atlantic meridional
overturning circulation during the next millennia, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
34, 1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029516" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029516</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Du, J., Haley, B. A., and Mix, A. C.: Evolution of the Global Overturning
Circulation since the Last Glacial Maximum based on marine authigenic
neodymium isotopes, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 241, 106396,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106396" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106396</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Duplessy, J. C., Shackleton, N. J., Fairbanks, R. G., Labeyriefi, L., Oppo,
D., Labeyrie, L., Oppo, D., and Kallel, N.: Deepwater source variations
during the last climatic cylce and their impact on the global deepwater
circulation, Paleoceanography, 3, 343–360,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/PA003i003p00343" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/PA003i003p00343</a>, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Edwards, N. R., Willmott, A. J., and Killworth, P. D.: On the role of
topography and wind stress on the stability of the thermohaline circulation,
J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 756–778,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0756:OTROTA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0756:OTROTA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Egbert, G. D., Ray, R. D., and Bills, B. G.: Numerical modeling of the
global semidiurnal tide in the present day and in the last glacial maximum,
J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 109, 1–15,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jc001973" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jc001973</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Evans, H. K. and Hall, I. R.: Deepwater circulation on Blake Outer Ridge
(western North Atlantic) during the Holocene, Younger Dryas, and Last
Glacial Maximum, Geochem. Geophy. Geosyst., 9, 1–19,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001771" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001771</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Fischer, H., Schmitt, J., Lüthi, D., Stocker, T. F., Tschumi, T.,
Parekh, P., Joos, F., Köhler, P., Völker, C., Gersonde, R.,
Barbante, C., Le Floch, M., Raynaud, D., and Wolff, E.: The role of
Southern Ocean processes in orbital and millennial CO<sub>2</sub> variations – A
synthesis, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 29, 193–205,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.06.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.06.007</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Freeman, E., Skinner, L. C., Waelbroeck, C., and Hodell, D.: Radiocarbon
evidence for enhanced respired carbon storage in the Atlantic at the Last
Glacial Maximum, Nat. Commun., 7, 1–8,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11998" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11998</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Gebbie, G.: How much did Glacial North Atlantic Water shoal?,
Paleoceanography, 29, 190–209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013PA002557" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013PA002557</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Goes, M., Murphy, L. N., and Clement, A. C.: The Stability of the AMOC
During Heinrich Events Is Not Dependent on the AMOC Strength in an
Intermediate Complexity Earth System Model Ensemble, Paleoceanogr.
Paleoclimatol., 34, 1359–1374, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003580" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003580</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Griffies, S. M.: The Gent–McWilliams Skew Flux, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28,
831–841, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0831:TGMSF&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0831:TGMSF&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Hesse, T., Butzin, M., Bickert, T., and Lohmann, G.: A model-data
comparison of <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C in the glacial Atlantic Ocean,
Paleoceanography, 26, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010PA002085" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010PA002085</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Howe, J. N. W., Piotrowski, A. M., Noble, T. L., Mulitza, S., Chiessi, C.
M., and Bayon, G.: North Atlantic Deep Water Production during the Last
Glacial Maximum, Nat. Commun., 7, 11765,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11765" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11765</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, A., Meehl, G. A., Han, W., Timmermann, A., Otto-Bliesner, B., Liu, Z.,
Washington, W. M., Large, W., Abe-Ouchi, A., Kimoto, M., Lambeck, K., and
Wu, B.: Role of the Bering Strait on the hysteresis of the ocean conveyor
belt circulation and glacial climate stability, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 109, 6417–6422, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116014109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116014109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Jenkins, W. J., Smethie, W. M., Boyle, E. A., and Cutter, G. A.: Water mass
analysis for the U.S. GEOTRACES (GA03) North Atlantic sections, Deep Sea
Res., 116, 6–20,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.11.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.11.018</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Wollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M.,
Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang,
J., Leetmaa, A., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis
Project. B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–472,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Keigwin, L. D. and Swift, S. A.: Carbon isotope evidence for a northern
source of deep water in the glacial western North Atlantic, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 2831–2835,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614693114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614693114</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Keigwin, L. D., Klotsko, S., Zhao, N., Reilly, B., Giosan, L., and
Driscoll, N. W.: Deglacial floods in the Beaufort Sea preceded Younger Dryas
cooling, Nat. Geosci., 11, 599–604,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0169-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0169-6</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Lambeck, K., Rouby, H., Purcell, A., Sun, Y., and Sambridge, M.: Sea level
and global ice volumes from the Last Glacial Maximum to the Holocene, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 15296–15303,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411762111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411762111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Lehman, S. J. and Keigwin, L. D.: Sudden changes in North Atlantic
circulation during the last deglaciation, Nature, 356, 757–762,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/356757a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/356757a0</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Lenton, T. M., Held, H., Kriegler, E., Hall, J. W., Lucht, W., Rahmstrof,
S., and Schellnhuber, H. J.: Tipping elements in the Earth System, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 1786–1793,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911106106" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911106106</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Lippold, J., Luo, Y., Francois, R., Allen, S. E., Gherardi, J., Pichat, S.,
Hickey, B., and Schulz, H.: Strength and geometry of the glacial Atlantic
Meridional Overturning Circulation, Nat. Geosci., 5, 813–816,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1608" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1608</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Lynch-Stieglitz, J.: The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation and
Abrupt Climate Change, Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci., 9, 83–104,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060415" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060415</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Lynch-Stieglitz, J., Adkins, J. F., Curry, W. B., Dokken, T., Hall, I. R.,
Herguera, J. C., Hirschi, J. J. M., Ivanova, E. V., Kissel, C., Marchal, O.,
Marchitto, T. M., McCave, I. N., McManus, J. F., Mulitza, S., Ninnemann, U.,
Peeters, F., Yu, E. F., and Zahn, R.: Atlantic meridional overturning
circulation during the last glacial maximum, Science, 316, 66–69,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137127" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137127</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
McCarthy, G. D., Smeed, D. A., Johns, W. E., Frajka-Williams, E., Moat, B.
I., Rayner, D., Baringer, M. O., Meinen, C. S., Collins, J., and Bryden, H.
L.: Measuring the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation at
26°N, Prog. Oceanogr., 130, 91–111,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.10.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.10.006</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
McManus, J. F., Francois, R., Gherardl, J. M., Kelgwin, L., and
Drown-Leger, S.: Collapse and rapid resumption of Atlantic meridional
circulation linked to deglacial climate changes, Nature, 428,
834–837, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02494" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02494</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Menviel, L., Yu, J., Joos, F., Mouchet, A., Meissner, K. J., and England,
M. H.: Poorly ventilated deep ocean at the Last Glacial Maximum inferred
from carbon isotopes: A data-model comparison study, Paleoceanography,
32, 2–17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA003024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA003024</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Menviel, L. C., Spence, P., Skinner, L. C., Tachikawa, K., Friedrich, T.,
Missiaen, L., and Yu, J.: Enhanced mid-depth southward transport in the
Northeast Atlantic at the Last Glacial Maximum despite a weaker AMOC,
Paleoceanog. Paleoclimatol., 35, e2019PA003793,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003793" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003793</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Monnin, E., Indermühle, A., Dällenbach, A., Flückiger, J.,
Stauffer, B., Stocker, T. F., Raynaud, D., and Barnola, J. M.: Atmospheric
CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations over the last glacial termination, Science,
291, 112–114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5501.112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5501.112</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Muglia, J. and Schmittner, A.: Glacial Atlantic overturning increased by
wind stress in climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 9862–9869,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064583" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064583</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, S. A., Joos, F., Edwards, N. R., and Stocker, T. F.: Water mass
distribution and ventilation time scales in a cost-efficient, three
dimensional ocean model, J. Climate, 19, 5479–5499,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3911.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3911.1</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Oppo, D. W., Curry, W. B., and McManus, J. F.: What do benthic <sup>13</sup>C and
<sup>18</sup>O data tell us about Atlantic circulation during Heinrich Stadial 1?,
Paleoceanography, 20, 353–368, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014PA002667" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014PA002667</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Oppo, D. W., Gebbie, G., Huang, K. F., Curry, W. B., Marchitto, T. M., and
Pietro, K. R.: Data Constraints on Glacial Atlantic Water Mass Geometry and
Properties, Paleoceanog. Paleoclimatol., 33, 1013–1034,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018PA003408" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018PA003408</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Peltier, W. R.: Ice Age Paleotopography, Science, 265, 195–201,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.265.5169.195" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.265.5169.195</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Pico, T., Mitrovica, J. X., and Mix, A. C.: Sea level fingerprinting of the
Bering Strait flooding history detects the source of the Younger Dryas
climate event, Sci. Adv., 6, eaay2935, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay2935" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay2935</a>,
2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Pöppelmeier, F., Blaser, P., Gutjahr, M., Jaccard, S., Frank, M., Max,
L., and Lippold, J.: Northern Sourced Water dominated the Atlantic Ocean
during the Last Glacial Maximum, Geology, 48, 826–829,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G47628.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G47628.1</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Pöppelmeier, F., Scheen, J., Jeltsch-Thömmes, A., and Stocker, T. F.: Model output from the Bern3D model of pre-industrial and Last Glacial Maximum, Data set, Zenodo, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4436092" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4436092</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Rahmstorf, S., Crucifix, M., Ganopolski, A., Goosse, H., Kamenkovich, I.,
Knutti, R., Lohmann, G., Marsh, R., Myzak, L. A., Wang, Z., and Weaver, A.
J.: Thermohaline circulation hysteresis: A model intercomparison, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 32, 1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023655" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023655</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Renssen, H., Mairesse, A., Goosse, H., Mathiot, P., Heiri, O., Roche, D. M.,
Nisancioglu, K. H., and Valdes, P. J.: Multiple causes of the Younger Dryas
cold period, Nat. Geosci., 8, 946–949,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2557" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2557</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Ritz, S. P., Stocker, T. F., and Joos, F.: A coupled dynamical ocean-energy
balance atmosphere model for paleoclimate studies, J. Climate, 24,
349–375, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3351.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3351.1</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Roberts, W. H. G., Valdes, P. J., and Payne, A. J.: A new constraint on the
size of Heinrich Events from an iceberg/sediment model, Earth Planet. Sci.
Lett., 386, 1–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.020</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Roth, R., Ritz, S. P., and Joos, F.: Burial-nutrient feedbacks amplify the sensitivity of atmospheric carbon dioxide to changes in organic matter remineralisation, Earth Syst. Dynam., 5, 321–343, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-321-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-321-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Sarnthein, M., Winn, K., Jung, S., Duplessy, J. C., Labeyrie, L.,
Erlenkeuser, H., and Ganssen, G.: Changes in east Atlantic deepwater
circulation over the last 30,000 years: Eight time slice reconstructions,
Paleoceanography, 9, 209–267, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93PA03301" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93PA03301</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Schmittner, A. and Egbert, G. D.: An improved parameterization of tidal mixing for ocean models, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 211–224, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-211-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-211-2014</a>, 2014.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Skinner, L. C., Primeau, F., Freeman, E., De La Fuente, M., Goodwin, P. A.,
Gottschalk, J., Huang, E., McCave, I. N., Noble, T. L., and Scrivner, A.
E.: Radiocarbon constraints on the glacial ocean circulation and its impact
on atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Nat. Commun., 8, 1–10,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms16010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms16010</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Stocker, T. F.: Past and future reorganizations in the climate system,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 19, 301–319,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00067-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00067-0</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Stocker, T. F. and Marchal, O.: Abrupt climate change in the computer: Is
it real?, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 1362–1365,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.4.1362" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.4.1362</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Stocker, T. F. and Schmittner, A.: Influence of CO<sub>2</sub> emission rates on
the stability of the thermohaline circulation, Nature, 388, 862–865,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/42224" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/42224</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Stocker, T. F. and Wright, D. G.: Rapid transitions of the ocean's deep
circulation induced by changes in surface water fluxes, Nature, 351,
729–732, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/351729a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/351729a0</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Stocker, T. F., Timmermann, A., Renold, M., and Timm, O.: Effect of salt
compensation on the climate model response in simulations of large changes
of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, J. Climate,
20, 5912–5928, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1662.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1662.1</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Stommel, H.: Thermohaline Convection with Two Stable Regimes, Tellus, 13, 224–230, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1961.tb00079.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1961.tb00079.x</a>, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Wilmes, S. B., Schmittner, A., and Green, J. A. M.: Glacial Ice Sheet
Extent Effects on Modeled Tidal Mixing and the Global Overturning
Circulation, Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol., 34, 1437–1454,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003644" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003644</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Woodgate, R. A., Aagaard, K., and Weingartner, T. J.: Monthly temperature,
salinity, and transport variability of the Bering Strait through flow,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, 1–4, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021880" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021880</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Zaucker, F., Stocker, T. F., and Broecker, W. S.: Atmospheric freshwater
fluxes and their effect on the global thermohaline circulation, J. Geophys.
Res., 99, 12443–12457, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC00526" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC00526</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
