<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">CP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Climate of the Past</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">CP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Clim. Past</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1814-9332</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/cp-16-1285-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Dynamical and hydrological changes in climate <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>simulations of the last millennium</article-title><alt-title>Dynamical and hydrological changes</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Dynamical and hydrological changes}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{P. J. Rold\'{a}n-G\'{o}mez et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Roldán-Gómez</surname><given-names>Pedro José</given-names></name>
          <email>peroldan@ucm.es</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>González-Rouco</surname><given-names>Jesús Fidel</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7090-6797</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Melo-Aguilar</surname><given-names>Camilo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0060-1853</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Smerdon</surname><given-names>Jason E.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Instituto de Geociencias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Pedro José Roldán-Gómez (peroldan@ucm.es)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>July</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>1285</fpage><lpage>1307</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>27</day><month>January</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>3</day><month>February</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14</day><month>May</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day><month>June</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e117">Simulations of climate of the last millennium (LM) show that external forcing had a major contribution to the evolution of temperatures; warmer and colder periods like the Medieval Climate Anomaly (MCA; ca. 950–1250 CE) and the Little Ice Age (LIA; ca. 1450–1850 CE) were critically influenced by changes in solar and volcanic activity. Even if this influence is mainly observed in terms of temperatures, evidence from simulations and reconstructions shows that other variables related to atmospheric dynamics and hydroclimate were also influenced by external forcing over some regions. In this work, simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 and Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP5/PMIP3) are analyzed to explore the influence of external forcings on the dynamical and hydrological changes during the LM at different spatial and temporal scales. Principal component (PC) analysis is used to obtain the modes of variability governing the global evolution of climate and to assess their correlation with the total external forcing at multidecadal to multicentennial timescales. For shorter timescales, a composite analysis is used to address the response to specific events of external forcing like volcanic eruptions. The results show coordinated long-term changes in global circulation patterns, which suggest expansions and contractions of the Hadley cells and latitudinal displacements of westerlies in response to external forcing. For hydroclimate, spatial patterns of drier and wetter conditions in areas influenced by the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), Northern Annular Mode (NAM), and Southern Annular Mode (SAM) and alterations in the intensity and distribution of monsoons and convergence zones are consistently found. Similarly, a clear short-term response is found in the years following volcanic eruptions. Although external forcing has a greater influence on temperatures, the results suggest that dynamical and hydrological variations over the LM exhibit a direct response to external forcing at both long and short timescales that is highly dependent on the particular simulation and model.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e129">Reconstructions and model simulations have shown that the evolution of temperatures during the last millennium (LM) was influenced by both external forcing and internal variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.1"/>. This evolution was characterized by long-term changes, like the transition from the Medieval Climate Anomaly (MCA; ca. 950–1250 CE) to the Little Ice Age (LIA; ca. 1450–1850 CE) and during the period of anthropogenic warming. The MCA and the LIA were periods of relatively warmer and cooler conditions, respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.2"/>, which have been related to solar variability and volcanic activity changes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.3"/> with additional contributions from ocean variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.4"/> and ice cover feedbacks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.5"/>. After the LIA, anthropogenic activities have had a major impact on most of the observed temperature changes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.6"/>. Temperature changes during the LM were noticeable at global scales, which is consistent with changes in the global energy balance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.7"/>, and at continental and large regional scales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.8"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1286?><p id="d1e157"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Because of its direct dependence on the energy balance, the response to external forcing is evident in temperature. However, coordinated changes during the LM are also found in atmospheric dynamics and hydroclimate. In extratropical areas, changes in large-scale modes of variability like the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) have been found both in reconstructed and simulated data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.9"/>. Even if for tropical areas larger uncertainties exist, long-term coordinated changes have also been found that are mostly related to the variability of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation phenomenon <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.10"><named-content content-type="pre">ENSO;</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e169">An alteration of the circulation modes can also lead to changes in the hydroclimate of many regions. This has been found both in analyses based on reconstructed data and to a lesser extent in analyses based on simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.11"/>. Reconstructions of the hydroclimate of eastern Africa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.12"/>, the Mediterranean area <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.13"/>, western North America <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.14"/>, and tropical South America <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.15"/> show coordinated changes in the hydroclimate of the LM. The spatial pattern associated with these changes is mainly latitudinal with latitudes of increased and decreased precipitation during the MCA and the LIA. Northern Europe and northern North America in particular showed wetter conditions during the MCA and drier conditions during the LIA, and southern Europe and southern North America showed the opposite <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.16"/>. Tropical areas, like eastern Africa and tropical South America, also showed increased precipitation in the north during the MCA and in the south during the LIA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx71" id="paren.17"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e194">Such coordinated changes in atmospheric dynamics and hydroclimate, with out-of-phase regional behaviors during the MCA and LIA, are suggestive of large-scale responses to external forcing. One possibility is that changes in global temperatures, as a consequence of changes in the forcing, could have altered modes of variability, and this in turn could have had an impact on hydroclimate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.18"/>. The latitudinal distribution of these changes in both tropical and extratropical areas is suggestive of a mechanism based on displacements of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) and expansions and contractions of the Hadley cells <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.19"/>. These changes may have contributed to the alteration of modes of variability like the NAO and Northern Annular Mode (NAM) in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) and Southern Annular Mode (SAM) in the Southern Hemisphere (SH).</p>
      <p id="d1e204">To assess the influence of external forcing and internal variability on these changes, we perform analyses of simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 and Paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project Phase 3 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.20"><named-content content-type="pre">CMIP5/PMIP3;</named-content></xref>. The use of a large set of simulations generated with different models and with different boundary conditions increases the reliability of results and allows us to sample different climate sensitivities and different plausible external forcing histories. Simulations from the Community Earth System Model's Last Millennium Ensemble <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.21"><named-content content-type="pre">CESM-LME;</named-content></xref> have also been included. The use of the 13 simulations from CESM-LME, utilizing the same boundary conditions but with different initial conditions, allows for a systematic sampling of internal variability. With these simulations, the contribution of external forcing and internal variability to temperature, atmospheric circulation, and hydroclimate has been analyzed. The changes in the forcing factors during the LM incorporate both short-term changes, associated with individual volcanic events, and long-term changes, related to variations in solar activity and orbital orientation. Our analyses allow us to evaluate whether global responses in temperature, dynamics, and hydroclimate to external forcing are manifest in climate models, what their expected spatial distribution is, and whether the simulated responses are consistent with those obtained from reconstructed data.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Models and methods</title>
      <p id="d1e225">Analyses are performed with simulations from CMIP5/PMIP3, including three simulations from the Goddard Institute for Space Studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.22"><named-content content-type="pre">GISS;</named-content></xref>, individual LM simulations from the Community Climate System Model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.23"><named-content content-type="pre">CCSM;</named-content></xref>, the Hadley Centre coupled model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.24"><named-content content-type="pre">HadCM;</named-content></xref>, the models of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.25"><named-content content-type="pre">CSIRO;</named-content></xref>, the Pierre Simon Laplace Institute <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.26"><named-content content-type="pre">IPSL;</named-content></xref>, the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.27"><named-content content-type="pre">MPI;</named-content></xref>, and the Meteorological Research Institute <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.28"><named-content content-type="pre">MRI;</named-content></xref>, and 13 additional simulations from the CESM-LME. Some technical details of these models are summarized in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, including the horizontal and vertical resolutions, the number of simulations covering the last millennium, and the forcings considered in these simulations.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e269">CMIP5/PMIP3 models analyzed in this work, including the number of simulations considered in the analyses (NS), the resolution of the atmosphere and ocean components (latitude, longitude, and levels), the forcing factors considered in the simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.29"><named-content content-type="pre">O – orbital; S – solar; V – volcanic; G – greenhouse gases; A – aerosols; L – land use and cover; according to</named-content></xref>, and the references for the model experiments. All simulations span the period 850–2005 CE. This interval will be referred to herein as LM even if within PMIP3 LM only includes 850–1850 CE. For the case of CMIP5/PMIP3 simulations, the past1000 and historical experiments have been concatenated to cover this interval.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Res. atm.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Res. ocean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Forcings</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">References</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CSIRO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.6</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – L18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – L21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">O, S, V, G</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.30"/>
                </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IPSL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – L39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – L31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">O, S, V, G</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.31"/>
                </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MRI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – L40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – L50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">O, S, V, G</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx1" id="text.32"/>
                </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MPI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – L47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – L40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">O, S, V, G, A, L</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.33"/>
                </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CCSM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – L26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – L60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">O, S, V, G, A, L</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.34"/>
                </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HadCM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.75</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – L19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – L20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">O, S, V, G, A, L</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.35"/>
                </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – L26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – L60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">O, S, V, G, A, L</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.36"/>
                </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GISS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – L40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – L32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">O, S, V, G, A, L</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx53" id="text.37"/>
                </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page1287?><p id="d1e828">Even if ensembles with individual forcing factors and with reduced sets of forcings are available for some particular models, only simulations with the most complete set of external forcings that were available for each model have been considered herein. As shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, all the analyzed simulations include solar variability, volcanic eruptions, greenhouse gases, and orbital changes as external forcings, while most of them also include land use and cover changes and anthropogenic aerosols. The reconstructions of forcings considered for each simulation can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.38"/> for the CMIP5/PMIP3 simulations and in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.39"/> for the CESM-LME simulations. The forcing factors are similar in all the simulations, which are based on the guidelines for CMIP5/PMIP3 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.40"/>. The greenhouse gases are mainly obtained from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.41"/>, the orbital changes from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.42"/>, the volcanic forcing from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.43"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.44"/>, the solar variability from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.45"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="text.46"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.47"/>, the land use from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.48"/>, and the aerosols from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.49"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e874"><bold>(a)</bold> External forcing factors (in W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) considered in the CESM-LME simulations, including greenhouse gases (GHGs), volcanic, solar, land use and cover (LU), and orbital forcing. The CESM-LME is selected as an example since it uses standard CMIP5/PMIP3 forcing specifications <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.50"/>. The forcing related to greenhouse gases is obtained by aggregating the contributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Volcanic forcing is represented with a different scale (in green). An evaluation of the total external forcing (TEF) following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.51"/> is also included. <bold>(b)</bold> Global average of temperature in the ensemble of simulations. For CESM and GISS, the range of minimum and maximum values in the subensemble at each time step is shown instead of individual model simulations. All temperature and TEF series have been 31-year low-pass filtered with a centered moving average. <bold>(c)</bold> Individual simulations in CESM and GISS subensembles. Dashed blue (CESM) and green (GISS) lines represent the range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SD) of the differences between each 31-year low-pass filtered member and the ensemble mean with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> being the mean of the residual and SD the standard deviation.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=210.550394pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e970">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> plots the forcing factors considered in the CESM-LME simulations as an example of the LM forcings. The figure also shows an estimation of the total external forcing (TEF) obtained following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.52"/> by aggregating the contributions of solar activity, orbital changes, volcanic activity, greenhouse gases (GHGs) including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, land use change, and anthropogenic sulfate aerosols, which are converted into radiative forcing units and filtered with a moving average of 31 years. Even if it presents some limitations in the conversion of volcanic forcing and the contribution of aerosols <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.53"/>, the TEF allows analyses of the long-term evolution of the overall incoming energy with long intervals of higher (MCA and industrial era) and lower (LIA) forcing, as well as multidecadal to centennial changes produced by the combination of solar and volcanic activity.</p>
      <p id="d1e1017">The response to external forcing of temperature and a number of variables representative of atmospheric circulation and hydroclimate conditions is analyzed, namely sea level pressure (SLP), zonal wind (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), soil moisture (SM), precipitation minus evaporation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the Palmer Drought Severity Index <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.54"><named-content content-type="pre">PDSI;</named-content></xref>, with the potential evapotranspiration calculated using Thornthwaite's method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.55"/>. While this formulation of PDSI has been shown to be problematic for soil moisture assessments during projections of the 21st century, differences between various formulations of PDSI have been shown to be minimal over the LM interval even when the 20th century is included <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.56"/>. Characterizing the hydrological state of the soil is challenging because different general circulation models (GCMs) incorporate different land models and soil moisture physics. This work is focused therefore on precipitation, on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as a descriptor of general surface hydrological interactions, and on soil moisture and PDSI as descriptors of soil moisture content. PDSI is incorporated to employ a homogeneous description of soil moisture content across models because it is calculated from atmospheric variables and assumes the same soil parameters across all of the models. It has been defined following the self-calibrating PDSI <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.57"><named-content content-type="pre">scPDSI;</named-content></xref>. All simulations have been interpolated to a common <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid resolution, the coarsest among the analyzed simulations.</p>
      <p id="d1e1099">At interannual scales, some events of external forcing such as volcanic eruptions are able to explain considerable changes in the analyzed variables <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.58"/>. To assess the impact of such events on the climate, we use a superposed epoch analysis (SEA) by defining a composite with the main volcanic eruptions within the LM and computing for this composite the global average of the variables previously mentioned for the 5 years before and 10 years after the events, which are selected following the procedure in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.59"/>. For simulations from CESM-LME and CCSM, which use the reconstruction from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.60"/> as volcanic forcing, the years of the composite have been selected based on the minima of forcing from this reconstruction: 1452, 1584, 1600, 1641, 1673, 1693, 1719, 1762, 1815, 1883, 1963, and 1990. For the other simulations, the reconstruction from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.61"/> has been considered: 1442, 1456, 1600, 1641, 1674, 1696, 1816, 1835, 1884, 1903, 1983, and 1992. The significance of the changes in the variables evaluated within the SEA has been calculated using a bootstrap method. In total, 2200 sets of 12 years (100 for each simulation) have been randomly taken from the whole analyzed period, excluding the years of volcanic eruptions and the 10 years after them, to generate a distribution of averages for each variable. The significance of the averages computed after the 12 volcanic eruptions are<?pagebreak page1288?> then determined using the 5 and 95 confidence limits from the bootstrap distribution.</p>
      <p id="d1e1114">We use principal component (PC) analyses to describe the spatiotemporal response of variables at multidecadal to centennial timescales. The analysis has been applied to data which have been low-pass filtered with a moving average of 31 years in order to emphasize the response to external forcing versus internal variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.62"/>. We concatenate all of the low-pass filtered simulations to determine the empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs) across all of the models. The PCs are later obtained by projecting each individual simulation on the EOF, and, to assess the agreement among different simulations, the correlation coefficients between PCs from each simulation have been computed. This method allows us to obtain the modes of variability that explain a greater percentage of variance when considering the whole ensemble because the covariability with external forcing is expected to show common features across models and simulations.</p>
      <p id="d1e1120">The results presented herein have been confirmed for consistency with an individual analysis of each model simulation. The single experiment EOFs bear only regional differences that do not contradict the results obtained with the combined analyses, with spatial correlations with the multi-model EOFs reaching 0.9 for some simulations and 0.7 for most of them. The analyses have been repeated but by weighting the simulations so that each model would have the same influence, and the results are consistent (not shown). The concatenation of some relatively large subensembles (GISS and CESM-LME) may bias the results to these models, but these additional analyses confirm that this is not the case. As an advantage, the concatenation of all simulations allows us to define EOFs that are valid for all models. Additionally, the incorporation of two subensembles allows for insights about the effects of internal variability since the GISS and CESM ensembles incorporate identical boundary conditions and different initial conditions for each simulation.</p>
      <p id="d1e1124">To identify which modes from those obtained in the PC analyses are capable of showing responses to external forcing, the correlation coefficients between their associated PC time series and the first PC of temperature have been computed, and only those showing the highest correlations have been analyzed in detail. The use of the first mode of temperature instead of the time series of external forcing factors removes the dependency on the particular reconstructions used by each model simulation. To confirm that the first mode of temperature is linked to the external forcing for the analyzed simulations, the correlation coefficient between the PC time series associated with this mode and the respective time series of the TEF used for each specific model have been computed. The significance of these correlations has been assessed with Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test for the correlation coefficient using an effective number of degrees of freedom that considers the window of the moving average applied to the input data.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1289?><p id="d1e1134">For a more detailed analysis of the long-term changes during the transition from the MCA to LIA, composites for the MCA and LIA have been defined from the ensemble average of each variable. The temporal phasing of these periods is regionally dependent and relies on the specific reconstruction or model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx43" id="paren.63"/>. For these analyses, the temporal intervals of these periods have been adopted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.64"/>, with the MCA ranging from 950 to 1250 CE and the LIA from 1450 to 1850 CE, although these time frames may not be regionally optimal. Composite maps of the differences between these two periods are derived for temperature, SLP, zonal wind, precipitation, soil moisture, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and scPDSI. The significance of these MCA–LIA differences is assessed by performing Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test for the difference of averages between the MCA and LIA for each grid point.</p>
      <p id="d1e1164">To better analyze the changes in the extratropical zonal circulation, the NAO, NAM, and SAM indices have been computed. The NAO index was obtained <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.65"/> with the difference of boreal winter (December, January, and February; DJF) SLP average for 20 to 55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W to 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and 55 to 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W to 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E. The NAM index was calculated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.66"/> as the difference between the DJF zonal mean SLP at 35 and 65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, and the SAM index was calculated from the difference between the zonal mean of annual SLP at 40 and 65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.67"/>. The NAO, NAM, and SAM indices have been obtained for each simulation from Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. The average of all the simulations was subsequently computed to determine the percentage of years with positive phases for successive intervals of 50 years. The change in the percentage of positive phases from the MCA to LIA was in turn assessed and the significance of the changes evaluated using Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Temperature</title>
      <p id="d1e1274">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> shows global temperature averages for all the ensemble members listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. As reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.68"/> in the case of the pre-PMIP3 LM experiments, there is a quasi-linear response of temperatures to changes in external forcing, with the major warmings occurring in periods with high solar activity and rise in GHGs and with coolings occurring in response to lower solar forcing and increased volcanic activity. For the 20th century, all the analyzed simulations consistently show a warming, but trends strongly differ among simulations due to the different climate sensitivities of each model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.69"/> and the considered forcings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.70"><named-content content-type="pre">see discussion in</named-content></xref>. Simulations from IPSL, CCSM, and GISS show a very strong trend, while simulations from CESM show a significant but smaller 20th century temperature increase. The results for the GISS and CESM subensembles are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b by plotting the minimum–maximum spread of all subensemble members, while Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c shows, for the sake of clarity, the behavior of each subensemble member. These subensembles demonstrate that internal variability generates differences across simulations that are smaller than structural differences in model formulation across models. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c shows the range (dashed lines) of the residuals resulting from subtracting the ensemble mean from each ensemble member simulation. Since the average of all ensemble members cancels out uncorrelated contributions of internal variability, the resulting ensemble mean constitutes a smoothed estimation of the forced response, and the residuals of subtracting the ensemble mean from each ensemble member are an estimation of internal variability above 31-year timescales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.71"/>. Both the CESM and GISS ensembles in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c show pre- and post-1850 low-frequency changes greater than the estimated changes of internal variability. Changes in the ensemble associated with external forcing are therefore in general more relevant than those of internal variability above 31-year timescales.
A similar behavior is found when performing a PC analysis of the simulated temperatures, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, with the first temperature EOF and PC estimates obtained from the simulations listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. Agreement between the different simulations is very good, all of them showing the same long-term trends described for Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> also shows the correlation among the estimated PCs of different simulations. Note that most of the analyzed simulations show correlations higher than 0.5 and that for simulations of the same model the correlations reach values around 0.9 both when analyzing the whole period and when considering only the preindustrial era. This indicates that even if the EOF has been obtained with a combined analysis, it is also representative of the individual simulations. Additionally, the use of large sets of simulations for some of the models, and in particular the use of the 13 CESM-LME simulations, does not significantly bias the results because the correlation ranges for models with individual simulations are as large as for the others. The variance of temperature that the first PC accounts for in the ensemble is greater than 50 % across all of the models, significantly greater than the variance explained by the remaining modes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). To evaluate whether this first mode is related to the forcing, the correlations of the PC of each simulation with the TEF (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a) have been included in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. All the correlations are significant and range between 0.61 and 0.79. The first PC of temperature is therefore mainly attributed to external forcing, and for this reason dynamics and hydroclimate variables are compared in the following sections against this mode to explore their forced responses.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1321">Analysis of temperature for the ensemble of simulations included in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.
<bold>(a)</bold> First EOF and <bold>(b)</bold> first PC time series for each simulation, as well as the average PC of all the simulations (black line). The percentage of explained variance is shown within the EOF map. The range of correlations between the PC of each simulation and those of other simulations is also included on the right of the plotted PCs both for the whole period (ALL) and for the preindustrial era (PRE). For these correlations, the significance level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) accounting for autocorrelation is shown with a black line.
<bold>(c)</bold> Map of temperature differences between MCA and LIA. Dots indicate locations where the differences are significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
<bold>(d)</bold> Composite average (solid lines) and maximum and minimum (dashed lines) global temperature anomalies in the 5 years before and 10 years after the 12 main volcanic eruptions of the LM. The vertical line indicates the year of the volcanic event. The horizontal black lines show the significance level of the average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) based on the distribution of averages of 12 years generated with 2200 sets randomly taken from the whole period excluding the years of the 12 main volcanic eruptions and the 10 years after them.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1383">Percentage of variance explained by the first eight modes obtained with the multi-model EOF analysis of temperature, SLP, zonal and meridional wind, precipitation, soil moisture, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and scPDSI.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1410">Correlations between the first PC of surface temperature of each model simulation and TEF (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a) and correlations for different simulations of the PC linked to the forcing for sea level pressure, zonal wind, and precipitation (first PC of SLP and zonal wind and second PC of precipitation) with the first PC of surface temperature. Correlations of the average PC time series are also included. Significant correlations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) accounting for autocorrelations are shown in bold.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Simulation</oasis:entry>
         <?xmltex \rotentry?><oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>/TEF</oasis:entry>
         <?xmltex \rotentry?><oasis:entry colname="col3">SLP/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <?xmltex \rotentry?><oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <?xmltex \rotentry?><oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CSIRO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.72</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.78</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IPSL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.71</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.89</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MRI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.65</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.59</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MPI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.72</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.57</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.46</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.87</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CCSM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.79</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.68</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.41</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.91</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HadCM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.70</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.35</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.42</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.82</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.61</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.36</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.54</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.59</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.61</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.41</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.50</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.66</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.46</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.66</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.60</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.57</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.61</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.43</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.56</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.65</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.40</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.58</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.66</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.40</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.62</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.65</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.56</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.61</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.36</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.55</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.61</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.53</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.63</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.72</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.49</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.62</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.64</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.64</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.63</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.50</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.64</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GISS-121</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.64</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.46</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.88</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GISS-124</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.67</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.69</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.56</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.91</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GISS-127</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.67</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.46</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.88</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.73</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.59</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.51</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.81</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1990">Regarding the spatial pattern of the EOF, values are higher over continental regions and smaller over oceans. For high latitudes, higher values are obtained over ice-covered areas, which is consistent with the polar amplification response in climate change scenarios <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.72"/>. For all regions, the first EOF shows positive loadings, meaning that situations of higher forcing correspond to higher<?pagebreak page1290?> temperatures for the whole planet and vice versa. This pattern has been discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="text.73"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.74"/>, and similarities can also be observed of the differences between the MCA and LIA (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c). The transition from MCA to LIA in most regions leads to a decrease in simulated temperatures, which is consistent with the negative external forcing anomalies applied in the simulations. The MCA–LIA pattern does not emphasize the tropics as much as the EOF pattern, indicating that the low-frequency variability changes in that area are minor and that the higher tropical loadings in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a stem from covariability at higher frequencies. Also note that area weighting has been applied to the EOF calculations, increasing the contribution of the tropical areas in these analyses.</p>
      <p id="d1e2006">At shorter timescales, the influence of external forcing is also evident. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>d shows the average, maximum, and minimum temperatures for the composite with the 5 years before and 10 years after the 12 main volcanic eruptions of the LM. Note that global temperature significantly decreases after these events and that their influence lasts several years until it totally disappears. Important differences exist among<?pagebreak page1291?> models in the response to volcanic eruptions. Some simulations, such as those from GISS, MPI, CESM, and CCSM, show a drastic cooling after volcanic events that is mostly recovered after four years. However, simulations from HadCM and CSIRO show a moderate cooling that lasts for a longer period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Atmospheric dynamics</title>
      <p id="d1e2019">To evaluate the possible influence of external forcing on global atmospheric dynamics, the same analyses performed for temperatures have been applied to SLP. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> shows results for the different timescales. The long-term behavior of the first PC of pressure is comparable to that of the first PC of temperature. For the case of pressure, the average PC (black line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b) tends to show higher values during the MCA, lower during the LIA, and a significant increase during the last century. The similarity of the first PC of SLP with that of temperature can be quantified through the correlation coefficient values (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>), which are significant for 73 % of the simulations in the ensemble and above 0.5 for 23 % of them. The average PC correlates with a value of 0.59 (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>) with the corresponding PC of temperature (black line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b). This suggests some response to external forcing in the SLP field. The first mode accounts for only 15 % of the variance in the pressure, showing an eigenvalue spectra flatter than the one of temperatures (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). This indicates that even if there is a response to external forcing, internal variability is more relevant than in the case of temperature. Additionally, the correlations among PCs of different simulations are in general not significant over the preindustrial period (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b). When the whole period is considered, more significant correlations are obtained.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2039">Analysis of SLP for the ensemble of simulations included in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.
<bold>(a)</bold> First EOF and <bold>(b)</bold> first PC time series for each simulation, as well as the average PC of all the simulations (black line). The percentage of explained variance is shown within the EOF map. The range of correlations between the PC of each simulation and those of other simulations is also included on the right of the plotted PCs both for the whole period (ALL) and for the preindustrial era (PRE). For these correlations, the significance level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) accounting for autocorrelation is shown with a black line.
<bold>(c)</bold> Map of SLP differences between MCA and LIA. Dots indicate locations where the differences are significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Contours with climatological SLP of 986 hPa (dashed green), 1012 hPa (solid green), 1016 hPa (dashed black), and 1020 hPa (solid black) are included in the EOF and MCA–LIA maps.
<bold>(d)</bold> Composite average (solid lines) and maximum and minimum (dashed lines) global SLP anomalies in the 5 years before and 10 years after the 12 main volcanic eruptions of the LM. The vertical line indicates the year of the volcanic event. The horizontal black lines show the significance level of the average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) based on the distribution of averages of 12 years generated with 2200 sets randomly taken from the whole period excluding the years of the 12 main volcanic eruptions and the 10 years after them.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2099">The EOF indicates that the first mode is mainly extratropical (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a). In the SH, there is an increase in pressure (positive loadings) around 40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and a decrease (negative loadings) around 80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S during the MCA (higher PC values) and conversely during the LIA. This spatial pattern, with positive loadings over the maxima of climatological SLP (black contours of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a) and negative loadings over the minima (green contours of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a), contributes to the positive phase of the mode to intensify gradients between subtropical and subpolar regions. This reinforces zonal circulation and contributes to more positive phases of the SAM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.75"/>, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. Regarding the NH, the pattern of pressure associated with the first mode is not as zonal as in the SH mostly because of the interaction with the continents. Overall, higher positive (negative) loadings are distributed over subtropical (polar) regions contributing to an increase (decrease) in the zonal flow during the MCA and industrial period due to the slightly higher values of the PC, which are also consistent with NAM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.76"/> enhancement.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2138">
Percentage of years with positive NAO, NAM, and SAM indices for each interval of 50 years. Horizontal lines show the total percentage for the MCA and the LIA. The differences between MCA and LIA are significant with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for NAO and NAM and with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for SAM.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2171">As in the leading EOF, the spatial pattern of the MCA–LIA differences (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c) also emphasizes the latitudinal gradients. Even if the exact boundaries between areas with positive and negative MCA–LIA differences do not fully match the zonal features of the first EOF loadings, the ensemble average shows the largest differences over the subpolar and subtropical regions, which contribute to the enhancement of the zonal flow in the MCA and to the weakening of it during the LIA. This pattern is associated with an intensification (MCA) and weakening (LIA) of the SAM, NAM, and NAO, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. The figure shows the percentage of years with positive NAO, NAM, and SAM indices for successive intervals of 50 years. Consistent with the spatial patterns and temporal evolutions shown in the PC analysis, a tendency toward more positive phases of the NAO, NAM, and SAM is observed during the MCA and industrial periods.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2180">Maps of SLP anomalies for the 10 years after the 12 main volcanic eruptions of the LM.
<bold>(a)</bold> Average of simulations from the CESM subensemble.
<bold>(b)</bold> Average of simulations from the GISS subensemble.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1292?><p id="d1e2195">Due to the large range of internal variability, the short-term response to volcanic forcing is not so evident in the PC of SLP as it is in the case of temperature. However, a low-frequency signal is observed in the mean PC series (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b) for which high frequencies are canceled out. If the largest volcanic events are considered, a clearer response emerges. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>d shows the global average of SLP for the composites for the 5 years before and 10 years after the main volcanic eruptions of the LM. Note that the global average of SLP shows significant changes triggered by volcanic activity. The sign and magnitude of the global net changes strongly depend on the model, but there is good agreement among simulations of the same model. For instance, simulations from GISS show an increase in pressure after volcanic events, while simulations from CESM-LME consistently show a decrease. This difference in the global average of pressure is not related to an opposite response in different models but to the distribution of areas with positive and negative loadings in the mode of variability associated with the forcing. As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, simulations from CESM show a greater number of areas with negative anomalies during periods with volcanic events, while simulations from GISS tend to show more areas with positive anomalies. In spite of the differences in the global balance of regional positive and negative anomalies between GISS and CESM-LME simulations, both produce a global weakening in zonal circulation during volcanic eruptions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2206">
Analysis of zonal wind for the ensemble of simulations included in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.
<bold>(a)</bold> First EOF and <bold>(b)</bold> first PC time series for each simulation, as well as the average PC of all the simulations (black line). The percentage of explained variance is shown within the EOF map. The range of correlations between the PC of each simulation and those of other simulations is also included on the right of the plotted PCs both for the whole period (ALL) and for the preindustrial era (PRE). For these correlations, the significance level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) accounting for autocorrelation is shown with a black line.
<bold>(c)</bold> Map of zonal wind differences between MCA and LIA. Dots indicate locations where the differences are significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Contours with climatological wind of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (east winds; green) and 6 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (west winds; black) are included in the EOF and MCA–LIA maps.
<bold>(d)</bold> Composite average (solid lines) and maximum and minimum (dashed lines) global zonal wind anomalies in the 5 years before and 10 years after the 12 main volcanic eruptions of the LM. The vertical line indicates the year of the volcanic event. The horizontal black lines show the significance level of the average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) based on the distribution of averages of 12 years generated with 2200 sets randomly taken from the whole period excluding the years of the 12 main volcanic eruptions and the 10 years after them.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2301">Some studies have shown that elevated forcings during the 20th century may be linked to a displacement of the ITCZ and an expansion of Hadley cells <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx57" id="paren.77"/>. This can be described in terms of wind velocity, in which the ITCZ is defined by the location of the trade winds and the extension of Hadley cells is marked by the position of the westerlies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.78"/>. Thus, the previous analysis is also performed for the zonal wind (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). In this case, the first mode accounts for 10 % of the total variance, a smaller percentage than for the case of temperature and SLP. The average PC of zonal wind shows a correlation of 0.51 with the average PC of temperature and 0.96 with that of SLP, indicating a response to the external forcing consistent with the one observed in temperature and SLP. However, the correlation with the PC of temperature for the individual simulations is in general small, indicating a greater impact of internal variability. As shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>, only five simulations show significant correlations,<?pagebreak page1293?> and only two of them are higher than 0.5. The agreement among different simulations can also be assessed through the correlations among their respective PCs, which are in general not significant when the preindustrial period is considered and are only significant for certain simulations when they are based on the whole period (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b). The correlation between the corresponding PC time series of zonal wind and that of SLP for each simulation is always above 0.7.</p>
      <p id="d1e2316">Thus, the distribution of zonal wind in the first EOF is consistent with the distribution of pressures previously shown. In the positive phase of the mode, negative (positive) loadings tend to distribute over the easterlies (westerlies) and over their high-latitude side, thus increasing latitudinal gradients and contributing to a polar displacement of the wind system; trade winds are enhanced towards higher latitudes in the Atlantic and eastern Pacific. This is consistent with an expansion of the Hadley cell and the higher intertropical loadings and MCA–LIA anomalies in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. The same behavior can be observed in the composites for the MCA and LIA, in which a poleward displacement of the westerlies is present during the simulated MCA relative to the LIA. However, the spatial pattern of the difference between the MCA and LIA differs for some regions relative to the one obtained from the EOF. For example, the differences between MCA and LIA indicate a reduction of zonal wind in the Mediterranean basin and an increase over Japan in the transition from MCA to LIA (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c), while the loading in the EOF for these particular areas (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a) is negative and positive, respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2327">Maps of zonal wind anomalies for the 10 years after the 12 main volcanic eruptions of the LM.
<bold>(a)</bold> Average of simulations from the CESM subensemble.
<bold>(b)</bold> Average of simulations from the GISS subensemble.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e2344"><bold>(a)</bold> Map of meridional wind differences between MCA and LIA. Dots indicate locations where the differences are significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
<bold>(b)</bold> Zonal mean of zonal wind (purple) and meridional wind (yellow) for the composite MCA–LIA for global, central Pacific (180–120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), and Atlantic (50–0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) basins.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2388">In the short term, the behavior of zonal wind resembles that of SLP. In most simulations, the short-term noise associated with internal variability dominates over the peaks associated with volcanic eruptions, as can be observed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b. When composites of the main volcanic eruptions are defined (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>d), a clear influence of volcanic activity emerges. As for the case of pressures, the sign of the impact depends on the model mostly because of the different spatial distribution of areas with positive and negative anomalies. This can also be observed when comparing maps of zonal wind during volcanic events obtained with the CESM and GISS subensembles (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>). In spite of the differences in some areas like the northern and tropical Atlantic and Pacific basins, both subensembles tend to weaken the global zonal circulation. However, the simulations from CESM (GISS) show more areas with positive (negative) zonal winds, which translate into a larger (smaller) increase in the global average.
These zonal changes are also evident in the behavior of the meridional wind component. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> shows the differences between MCA and LIA in terms of meridional wind, as well as the zonal mean of these differences for zonal and meridional components for both global and regional Pacific (180–120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) and Atlantic (50–0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) basins (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b). During the simulated MCA, changes in zonal and meridional winds took place with antiphase relationships that strengthened the zonal circulation at middle and high latitudes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b) with increases in the NAO, NAM, and SAM (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>), while within the intertropical regions the trade winds and convergence were intensified (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). The opposite holds for the LIA.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Hydroclimate</title>
      <p id="d1e2436">For the case of precipitation, Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> and. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> show the EOF and PC series for the leading two modes. Both modes show cross-basin influences in the tropical regions that connect the Indian, Pacific, and Atlantic oceans. Precipitation loadings are suggestive of ENSO, Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), and monsoon influences <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.79"/>, thus showing large-scale coordinated responses that can connect in-phase or out-of-phase intra- and intercontinental responses. Although the first PC shows large negative values during the volcanically active 13th century and some slight increase during the 20th century, it is the second PC that resembles the external forcing response. Furthermore, its EOF emphasizes the distribution of monsoon precipitation over the global monsoon domain within the intertropical region. In the extratropics, the EOF pattern (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>a) shows distributions of loadings that are consistent with changes in NH NAM and SH SAM circulation. The PC series (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>b) clearly shows the long-term trends associated with the external forcing with higher values during the MCA and 20th century and lower values during the LIA, as well as the short-term response to volcanic events, which is in agreement with the analysis of pressures (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>) and winds (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e2457">
<bold>(a)</bold> First EOF of precipitation for the ensemble of simulations included in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. The percentage of explained variance is shown within the EOF map.
<bold>(b)</bold> PC time series for each simulation. The average of all the simulations is also included (black line).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=224.776772pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e2476">
Analysis of precipitation for the ensemble of simulations included in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.
<bold>(a)</bold> Second EOF and <bold>(b)</bold> second PC time series for each simulation, as well as the average PC of all the simulations (black line). The percentage of explained variance is shown within the EOF map. The range of correlations between the PC of each simulation and those of other simulations is also included on the right of the plotted PCs both for the whole period (ALL) and for the preindustrial era (PRE). For these correlations, the significance level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) accounting for autocorrelation is shown with a black line.
<bold>(c)</bold>  Map of precipitation differences between MCA and LIA. Dots indicate locations where the differences are significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Contours with climatological precipitation of 120 mm per month are included in black in the EOF and MCA–LIA maps.
<bold>(d)</bold> Composite average (solid lines) and maximum and minimum (dashed lines) global precipitation anomalies in the 5 years before and 10 years after the 12 main volcanic eruptions of the LM. The vertical line indicates the year of the volcanic event. The horizontal black lines show the significance level of the average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) based on the distribution of averages of 12 years generated with 2200 sets randomly taken from the whole period excluding the years of the 12 main volcanic eruptions and the 10 years after them.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1296?><p id="d1e2537">There is good agreement between different models and different simulations with correlations being higher than 0.5 for simulations of different models and reaching 0.9 for different simulations of the same model (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>b; ALL). The correlation between the second mode of precipitation and the first mode of temperature (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>) is significant for all the analyzed simulations, ranging from 0.5 to 1 and being higher in the simulations from GISS, IPSL, and MPI and lower in the simulations from CESM and MRI. These values are higher than those obtained for pressure and winds. However, this mode accounts only for 5.8 % of the precipitation variance, a lower value than the one obtained for variables of dynamics. As seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, the modes associated with internal variability acquire a greater relevance in the case of precipitation. This suggests that the potential detection of this signal in reconstructions would be difficult and, if possible, more likely at very local scales.
The MCA–LIA differences (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>c) show some similarities with the EOF loadings in extratropical regions, indicating greater precipitation at northern latitudes in the MCA (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>c) or with increased forcing at all timescales above 31 years (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>a, b). Within the tropical regions, agreement is regionally complex, with MCA–LIA differences emphasizing low-frequency changes and EOF loadings including covariability at all timescales. Changes in dynamics described in Sect. 3.2 are consistent with the changes in precipitation. As for the case of dynamics, some zonal symmetry is observed in extratropical areas, suggesting that changes in the Northern and Southern Annular modes affect the distribution of precipitation in these regions. The highest variability occurs in intertropical areas over the regions with the greatest amount of annual rainfall, thus overlapping well with changes in the global monsoon domain and ITCZ convergence. MCA–LIA differences are regional in scope and show anomalies of different signs over the North and South American monsoon systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.80"><named-content content-type="pre">NAMS, SAMS;</named-content></xref>, therefore without a clear response of NAMS and SAMS. This agrees with uncertainty in climate change projections over the NAMS, with CMIP5 models producing changes in precipitation that distribute around zero <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.81"/>. The same occurs over the Australian and Maritime Continent monsoon systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.82"><named-content content-type="pre">AUSMC;</named-content></xref>. Positive values are found over the East Asian and South Asian summer monsoon areas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.83"><named-content content-type="pre">EAS, SAS;</named-content></xref>, which is in agreement with scenario simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.84"/>. Even if changes are not significant over many of these regions due to the high variability of precipitation, they show a pattern of response to forcing in LM PMIP3 simulations consistent with that of scenario simulations; the consistency also extends to convergence zones. In the Atlantic and eastern Pacific north of the Equator <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.85"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, positive MCA–LIA differences suggest increases in mean precipitation during the MCA. Likewise, in the South Pacific Convergence Zone extending from the western Pacific southeastwards <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.86"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, positive differences also emerge, indicating increased rainfall during the MCA. Over South America, negative anomalies are found in the northwest of the climatological maxima (black contours in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>b) and positive anomalies in the southeast, depicting rainfall shifts in the South Atlantic Convergence Zone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.87"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e2592"><bold>(a)</bold> Areas considered in the analysis of monsoon domains: North American monsoon system (NAMS), South American monsoon system (SAMS), the northern African (NAF), southern African (SAF), East Asian summer (EAS), South Asian summer (SAS) monsoons, and the Australian–Maritime continent (AUSMC). <bold>(b)</bold> Precipitation differences for MCA–LIA over the monsoon domains. Box and whisker plots show the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles of simulations included in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. Domains with significant changes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) have been highlighted in green. <bold>(c)</bold> Zonal mean of precipitation for the composite MCA–LIA for the whole globe and for bands of 150<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E–150<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 150–80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 60–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, and 30–0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2669">To better analyze these changes, MCA–LIA precipitation differences are calculated for the monsoon domains in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>a. Changes in precipitation in the transition from the MCA to LIA (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>b) are small in NAMS and SAMS for all the analyzed simulations. Notice that over the NAMS and SAMS regions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>a) both positive and negative MCA–LIA anomalies (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>c) are distributed, thus hampering a clear net response. The same happens over the northern African (NAF) and southern African (SAF) regions with an increase in model spread and SAF being biased towards increased precipitation during the MCA. Therefore, even if net regional responses are small due to the compensation of anomalies of different signs, subregional differences may be large. The greatest impact of the MCA-to-LIA transition in the monsoon systems appears over Asia, where EAS and SAS are significantly altered. Rainfall anomalies in EAS and SAS monsoon areas are larger during the MCA relative to the LIA. This pattern is consistently found in most of the simulations. For the AUSMC, some simulations show very positive differences while others are very negative, indicating that models all show important variations over this area but the magnitude and spatial distribution of these changes are strongly model-dependent. The global zonal mean of precipitation for the MCA–LIA (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>c) does not show important changes but only slightly larger values of precipitation anomalies during the MCA than during the LIA for most latitudes. However, if ranges of longitude over the Pacific and Atlantic basins are considered, relevant changes in the convergence areas are observed. The zonal mean for the range of 150<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E–150<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W shows higher precipitation rates during the MCA relative to the LIA in equatorial areas of the central and western Pacific. In the eastern Pacific (150–80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), precipitation is decreased (increased) north (south) of the Equator during the MCA-to-LIA transition, suggesting a southward displacement of the convergence zone. Ranges of 60–30 and 30–0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W show that the convergence zone is also altered in the Atlantic basin with less intense precipitation around the Equator during the MCA than during the LIA.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2722">Correlations for different simulations of the PC linked to the forcing for soil moisture, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and scPDSI (first PC of scPDSI and second PC of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and soil moisture) with the first PC of surface temperature and the second PC of precipitation. Correlations of the average PC time series are also included. Significant correlations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) accounting for autocorrelations are shown in bold.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Simulation</oasis:entry>
         <?xmltex \rotentry?><oasis:entry colname="col2">SM/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <?xmltex \rotentry?><oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <?xmltex \rotentry?><oasis:entry colname="col4">scPDSI/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <?xmltex \rotentry?><oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <?xmltex \rotentry?><oasis:entry colname="col6">scPDSI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CSIRO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.65</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.87</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.76</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.74</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IPSL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.90</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.80</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MRI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.35</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MPI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.67</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.88</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.69</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.79</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CCSM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.77</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.90</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.80</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.79</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HadCM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.59</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.74</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.45</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.68</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.91</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.63</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.57</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.90</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.61</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.39</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.39</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.51</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.84</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.73</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.59</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.87</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.71</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.61</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.86</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.56</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.38</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.66</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.88</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.58</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.38</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.63</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.82</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.65</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.40</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.74</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.90</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.72</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.70</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.87</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.67</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.58</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.86</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.67</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.36</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.67</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.86</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.59</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.37</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.64</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.83</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.62</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CESM-013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.41</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.66</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.88</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.69</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GISS-121</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.77</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.88</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.72</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.67</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GISS-124</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.76</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.80</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.75</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.66</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GISS-127</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.84</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.88</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.83</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.75</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.62</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.94</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.93</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.91</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3465">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>d shows the global average of precipitation anomalies in the 5 years before and 10 years after the 12 main volcanic eruptions of the LM. A consistent decrease in global precipitation can be observed in all of the simulations after these volcanic events, being significant for most<?pagebreak page1297?> of them. The responses described for different timescales in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> are consistent with changes in scenario simulations described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.88"/>: increases in external forcing strengthen the hydrological cycle, enhancing zonal circulation in extratropical regions and increasing the global monsoon activity and equatorial convergence. This is found in the global average of precipitation after volcanic events and in the alteration of monsoons and latitudinal distribution obtained in the EOF, indicating a relevant response to external forcing in precipitation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e3478">Regions showing high positive <bold>(a)</bold> or negative <bold>(b)</bold> correlation between precipitation and the mode of precipitation associated with the forcing for the ensemble of simulations included in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. Contours of correlation equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.6 are shown for each simulation. Dots indicate locations where the time series of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/> have been extracted.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e3509">Time series of precipitation in millimeters per month for some particular case example locations. The range of correlations between the time series of each simulation and those of other simulations at those specific locations is also included both for the whole period (right; ALL) and for the preindustrial era (left; PRE). For these correlations, the significance level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) accounting for autocorrelation is shown with a black line. All precipitation series have been 31-year low-pass filtered with a centered moving average.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3530">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/> explores the robustness of regional forcing influences on precipitation across models and simulations. It shows areas of high positive correlation (above 0.6, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; panel a) and regions of high negative correlation (below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; panel b) between precipitation and the mode of precipitation associated with the forcing of the ensemble of model simulations. Most model simulations correlate with external forcing over the same large-scale regions: the high-latitude bands related to zonal NAM and SAM circulation changes (e.g., negative correlations in the south of Europe and positive in the north) and the intertropical regions related to monsoon domains and convergence. Some models show larger areas of sensitivity to forcing, while others present fewer regions where precipitation relates to the long-term changes in temperature produced by external forcing. For example, simulations from GISS show negative correlations in the north of Australia and the south of Africa that do not appear in simulations from CESM-LME. Despite most of the models showing positive correlations in the extratropical and tropical areas of the Pacific basin and negative correlations in tropical areas of the Atlantic basin and in southeastern Asia, the areas of high correlation are spatially constrained to regional and even local scales and may not overlap in different models or even in simulations of the same model. These regional differences are likely the sign of the important influence of internal variability. Correlations in high-latitude bands are all positive, while negative correlations arise mostly over the areas of monsoon activity in Africa, Asia, and America (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>b), as in the case of negative MCA–LIA anomalies discussed above. This view has implications for the detection of a potential response to global temperature and forcing changes in drought-sensitive proxy data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.89"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> as the spatial dimension of the response can be quite limited particularly over land. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/> shows examples of simulated precipitation at the grid-point level in cases that tend to show some correlation with forcing like Spain, China, and Peru (see grid-point locations highlighted with points in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>) and also at locations that tend to show limited connections to forcing within the ensemble: California, Quebec, and Brazil. At all these points, the different ranges of internal variability tend to be larger than the forcing signal. In some areas, the 20th century trends show precipitation increases, like in the selected Brazil and Peru sites, while in others there is no response (e.g., the<?pagebreak page1299?> California site) or precipitation tends to decrease (e.g., the selected sites in Spain and China). Inter-simulation correlations tend to increase during the 20th century for sites showing trends and remain insignificant for most inter-ensemble pairs in preindustrial times.</p>
      <p id="d1e3581">Similar results to those obtained for precipitation are obtained when analyzing other variables representative of the water content of the soil. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, scPDSI, and soil moisture in particular have been analyzed in this work. Even if these variables provide similar information, important differences exist between them. Because soil moisture takes into account the water balance in previous time steps, together with precipitation, evaporation, and temperature, its variations are typically smoother than those observed in atmospheric variables. Something similar happens with scPDSI, which similarly takes into account soil moisture conditions from the previous months. Due to the higher number of factors considered in the computation of soil moisture and the fact that this variable is fully integrated within the models, it is a preferred variable for assessing drought variability in the models. However, different GCMs and their respective soil models may provide different treatments of soil moisture, making it difficult to combine data from different models in a single analysis. For this reason, the use of indices, such as scPDSI, may provide more consistent comparisons across different models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.90"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{15}?><label>Figure 15</label><caption><p id="d1e3605">
Analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the ensemble of simulations included in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.
<bold>(a)</bold> Second EOF and <bold>(b)</bold> second PC time series for each simulation, as well as the average PC of all the simulations (black line). The percentage of explained variance is shown within the EOF map. The range of correlations between the PC of each simulation and those of other simulations is also included on the right of the plotted PCs both for the whole period (ALL) and for the preindustrial era (PRE). For these correlations, the significance level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) accounting for autocorrelation is shown with a black line.
<bold>(c)</bold> Map of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> differences between MCA and LIA. Dots indicate locations where the differences are significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
<bold>(d)</bold> Composite average (solid lines) and maximum and minimum (dashed lines) global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies in the 5 years before and 10 years after the 12 main volcanic eruptions of the LM. The vertical line indicates the year of the volcanic event. The horizontal black lines show the significance level of the average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) based on the distribution of averages of 12 years generated with 2200 sets randomly taken from the whole period excluding the years of the 12 main volcanic eruptions and the 10 years after them.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f15.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{16}?><label>Figure 16</label><caption><p id="d1e3711">
Analysis of scPDSI for the ensemble of simulations included in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.
<bold>(a)</bold> First EOF and <bold>(b)</bold> first PC time series for each simulation, as well as the average PC of all the simulations (black line). The percentage of explained variance is shown within the EOF map. The range of correlations between the PC of each simulation and those of other simulations is also included on the right of the plotted PCs both for the whole period (ALL) and for the preindustrial era (PRE). For these correlations, the significance level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) accounting for autocorrelation is shown with a black line.
<bold>(c)</bold> Map of scPDSI differences between MCA and LIA. Dots indicate locations where the differences are significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
<bold>(d)</bold> Composite average (solid lines) and maximum and minimum (dashed lines) global scPDSI anomalies in the 5 years before and 10 years after the 12 main volcanic eruptions of the LM. The vertical line indicates the year of the volcanic event. The horizontal black lines show the significance level of the average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) based on the distribution of averages of 12 years generated with 2200 sets randomly taken from the whole period excluding the years of the 12 main volcanic eruptions and the 10 years after them.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f16.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F17" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{17}?><label>Figure 17</label><caption><p id="d1e3773">
Analysis of soil moisture for the ensemble of simulations included in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.
<bold>(a)</bold> Second EOF and <bold>(b)</bold> second PC time series for each simulation, as well as the average PC of all the simulations (black line). The percentage of explained variance is shown within the EOF map. The range of correlations between the PC of each simulation and those of other simulations is also included on the right of the plotted PCs both for the whole period (ALL) and for the preindustrial era (PRE). For these correlations, the significance level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) accounting for autocorrelation is shown with a black line.
<bold>(c)</bold> Map of soil moisture differences between MCA and LIA. Dots indicate locations where the differences are significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
<bold>(d)</bold> Composite average (solid lines) and maximum and minimum (dashed lines) global soil moisture anomalies in the 5 years before and 10 years after the 12 main volcanic eruptions of the LM. The vertical line indicates the year of the volcanic event. The horizontal black lines show the significance level of the average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) based on the distribution of averages of 12 years generated with 2200 sets randomly taken from the whole period excluding the years of the 12 main volcanic eruptions and the 10 years after them.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f17.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3833">Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/> to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/> show the modes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, scPDSI, and soil moisture that bear a relationship with global temperature and<?pagebreak page1300?> thus external forcing responses. The associated mode is the second for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>) and soil moisture (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/>) and the first for scPDSI (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and scPDSI present PCs that correlate significantly with the temperature response mode (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>); the correlation of the average PC with that of temperature being 0.62 and 0.94 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and scPDSI, respectively. Individual correlations are significant for most simulations and particularly high for those of GISS, IPSL, and CCSM. The highest correlations are attained for scPDSI, being significant and above 0.5 for all simulations, while for soil moisture correlations are lower and in general not significant. The correlations with precipitation (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>) are significant for both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and scPDSI, being generally higher for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The correlation of the average PC of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and scPDSI with that of precipitation reaches values of 0.93 and 0.91, respectively. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and scPDSI there is a clear time response pattern that shows an evolution very similar to that of precipitation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>) and temperature (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being more related to precipitation and scPDSI to temperature, as shown in the correlations of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>. In the case of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the EOF spatial pattern is similar to that of precipitation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>a), showing large negative values over parts of the central American and north of the South American monsoon regions, as well as over the East Asian continent and over parts of the African monsoon regions, where the EOF of precipitation also includes negative loadings. Positive loadings are shown over extratropical continents – in northern Europe, southeastern North America, Alaska, and eastern Siberia – and thus over areas influenced by changes in zonal circulation, which is consistent with the results of the precipitation analyses. As in the case of precipitation, volcanic forcing produces global negative anomalies in the model ensemble that tend to last over 2–3 years.</p>
      <p id="d1e4005">The scPDSI shows a very similar EOF pattern to that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> but with greater emphasis on the negative loadings that dominate over larger scales, extending over Australia, the broader African continent, South America, and large areas of North America and Eurasia (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>a). Thus, contrary to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and precipitation results, which show more areas with positive anomalies during the 20th century, scPDSI shows negative trends for most regions. Negative scores in the PC during the volcanic episodes, associated with global spread negative loadings, are indicative of wetter soils, and indeed Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>d shows increments in the global average of scPDSI in<?pagebreak page1301?> the model ensemble over timescales of about 5 years. Correlations between various ensemble members are high for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>b) if the 20th century trends are considered and lower and often not significant for preindustrial times, indicating the influence of internal variability as in the case of precipitation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>b). The scPDSI correlations are, however, significant and high during preindustrial times as well, which is likely a sign of the influence of temperature evolution in this variable. MCA–LIA changes for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>c) are very similar to the continental component of the corresponding precipitation pattern (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>c). As in the case of the EOF loadings, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>c shows MCA–LIA changes consistent with Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>c though with widespread negative scPDSI values.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F18" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{18}?><label>Figure 18</label><caption><p id="d1e4084">Second EOF and PC of soil moisture for the subensembles of CESM and GISS.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/16/1285/2020/cp-16-1285-2020-f18.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4094">The analysis of soil moisture (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/>) does not show a clear relationship to external forcing, with some of the simulations in the ensemble showing poor correlations with temperature (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). Some sensitivity to volcanic events and 20th century warming is apparent in the behavior of the PC time series. The composite of volcanic eruptions shows some increase in variability in the ensemble but not a clear response to increasing or decreasing soil moisture during volcanic events, indicating that internal variability may dominate over a potential response to the forcing. The associated EOF and MCA–LIA map (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/>a, c) shows similarities to those of Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>a, c and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>a, c with negative values over northern South America and parts of central and southern Africa. Over northern Africa, soil moisture shows positive loadings in the EOF and wetter values in the MCA–LIA differences. Interestingly, all EOF (MCA–LIA) maps in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/> show negative (positive) values over eastern Asia and positive (negative) values over eastern North America. Despite an absence of a universal response of soil moisture to external forcing, some of the simulations have clearer responses. This is the case of the CESM and GISS models. When an analysis is carried out independently for these subensembles, the resulting PC series (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F18"/>) show a clear correspondence with the temperature PC. Their corresponding EOFs show, however, considerable spatial differences.</p>
      <p id="d1e4116">These results suggest that a more focused analysis would be required to address the behavior of drought-related variables and, specifically, soil moisture while also<?pagebreak page1302?> considering more ad hoc techniques and homogeneous definitions of the soil moisture content. Soil moisture, scPDSI, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> measure different parts of the hydrological cycle. Additionally, soil moisture behavior during the 20th century may be affected by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fertilization effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.91"/> which are not present in other variables such as scPDSI. For this reason, the analyses based on these variables should be considered complementary and not necessarily comparable.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4156">This work investigated the response of the current generation of climate models to changes in external forcing during the LM. For this purpose, an ensemble of CMIP5/PMIP3 model simulations is considered, including all natural and anthropogenic forcings during the LM. It is focused on temperature as a reference to identify the response to external forcing and search for consistencies in the behavior of large-scale dynamics and hydrology. Large-scale dynamics were assessed by studying changes in SLP and zonal and meridional wind, while hydrological changes were studied by considering precipitation and drought-related variables. For the latter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, scPDSI, and soil moisture were considered. All variables were studied considering changes at different timescales. PC analysis was used to identify the multi-model typical pattern of response of different variables to the external forcing changes from decadal to multicentennial timescales, MCA–LIA differences are characterized as descriptors of large-scale changes associated with changes in natural forcing during preindustrial times, and volcanic composites are used as indicators of large interannual changes.</p>
      <p id="d1e4173">The temperature response to forcing depicts a spatial pattern of temperature anomalies that are larger over the continents and polar areas than over oceans. The temporal response of temperature shows changes that follow those of natural forcing during the LM and anthropogenic forcing post-1850. All analyzed variables, both related to dynamics and hydroclimate, show responses that correlate or are consistent with those of temperature. Changes in SLP depict increases (decreases) in the zonal flow in the high latitudes of both hemispheres during times of higher (lower) forcing. Within the tropical regions, zonal and meridional wind<?pagebreak page1303?> components indicate that changes favor convergence and alter the monsoon system. PC time series correlate with those of temperature, and volcanic composites also show sensitivity in these variables. The responses nevertheless can be spatially variable for different models and contribute differently to global averages.</p>
      <p id="d1e4176">Precipitation changes show a hydrological cycle that is enhanced, which is consistent with the changes in temperature. At middle and high latitudes, precipitation anomalies arise in response to changes in the zonal flow. Within the intertropical regions, precipitation anomalies distribute over monsoon regions and convergence zones, which is consistent with the changes described for climate change scenario simulations. Such large-scale anomalies distribute over different continents, generating covariance in intra- and inter-basin regions. Nevertheless, other modes of internal variability also show widespread inter-basin anomalies and have the potential to contribute to multidecadal and centennial changes in the system.</p>
      <p id="d1e4179">The analysis of drought-related variables shows dependencies with the definition of the variable itself and its relationship to temperature or precipitation. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> shows responses that mimic those of precipitation over the continents. Increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values tend to occur with increased forcing over mid- and high-latitude regions influenced by the zonal flow. Within the intertropical regions, the same anomalies for precipitation are simulated over monsoon-sensitive areas. For the MCA–LIA differences, increased drought is simulated over northern South American and southern African monsoon regions, while increased wetness is simulated over the Asian monsoon regions. Unlike <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, scPDSI shows higher correlations with temperature with spatial patterns that show decreased wetness for most areas during the MCA and industrial period and increased wetness during the LIA. The time evolution of its forcing response mode is very similar to that of temperature, globally producing increased scPDSI (reduced drought) during volcanic composites and contributing to increased drought during the 20th century.</p>
      <p id="d1e4226">The behavior of soil moisture is more complex and model-dependent. Some models depict clear responses to forcing but with differences in their spatial distribution and time response. The analysis of this variable shows a great dependency on the land models within the climate model itself. A response to external forcing is found when analyzing subensembles of CESM and GISS independently but not in the combined analyses including simulations from different models. This indicates that soil moisture can produce relevant results if a single model is considered, but it is not a suitable variable for analyses involving simulations with different land models.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4234">The analyses included in this work have been based on the CMIP5/PMIP3 data, which are publicly available.<?pagebreak page1304?> More details about the outcomes of these analyses can be requested from the authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4240">This study is part of PJRG's PhD. PJRG contributed with data processing, the analysis of results, and the writing of the paper. JFGR, CMA, and JES contributed to the analysis and discussion of results and to the writing of the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4246">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4252">This research has been supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (grant nos. IlModels CGL2014-59644-R and GreatModelS RTI2018-102305-B-C21).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4258">This paper was edited by Hugues Goosse and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Adachi et al.(2013)Adachi, Yukimoto, Deushi, Obata, Nakano, Tanaka,
Hosaka, Sakami, Yoshimura, Hirabara, Shindo, Tsujino, Mizuta, Yabu, Koshiro,
Ose, and Kitoh</label><?label adachietal2013?><mixed-citation>
Adachi, Y., Yukimoto, S., Deushi, M., Obata, A., Nakano, H., Tanaka, T. Y.,
Hosaka, M., Sakami, T., Yoshimura, H., Hirabara, M., Shindo, E., Tsujino, H.,
Mizuta, R., Yabu, S., Koshiro, T., Ose, T., and Kitoh, A.: Basic performance
of a new earth system model of the Meteorological Research Institute
(MRI-ESM1), Pap. Meteorol. Geophys., 64, 1–19, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Anchukaitis et~al.(2017)Anchukaitis, Wilson, Briffa, B\"{u}ntgen, Cook,
D'Arrigo, Davi, Esper, Frank, Gunnarson, Hegerl, Helama, Klesse, Krusic,
Linderholm, Myglano, Osborn, Zhang, and Zorita}}?><label>Anchukaitis et al.(2017)Anchukaitis, Wilson, Briffa, Büntgen, Cook,
D'Arrigo, Davi, Esper, Frank, Gunnarson, Hegerl, Helama, Klesse, Krusic,
Linderholm, Myglano, Osborn, Zhang, and Zorita</label><?label anchukaitisetal2017?><mixed-citation>
Anchukaitis, K., Wilson, R., Briffa, K. R., Büntgen, U., Cook, E., D'Arrigo,
R., Davi, N., Esper, J., Frank, D., Gunnarson, B. E., Hegerl, G., Helama, S.,
Klesse, S., Krusic, P. J., Linderholm, H. W., Myglano, V., Osborn, T. J.,
Zhang, P., and Zorita, E.: Last millennium Northern Hemisphere summer
temperatures from tree rings: Part II, spatially resolved
reconstructions, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 163, 1–22, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Anchukaitis and Tierney(2013)</label><?label anchukaitisandtierney2013?><mixed-citation>
Anchukaitis, K. J. and Tierney, J. E.: Identifying coherent spatiotemporal
modes in time-uncertain proxy paleoclimate records, Clim. Dynam., 41,
1291–1306, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Berger(1978)</label><?label berger1978?><mixed-citation>
Berger, A.: Long-term variations of daily insolation and Quaternary climatic
changes, J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 2363–2367, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bindoff et al.(2013)Bindoff, Stott, AchutaRao, Allen, Gillett,
Gutzler, Hansingo, Hegerl, Hu, Jain, Mokhov, Overland, Perlwitz, Sebbari, and
Zhang</label><?label bindoffetal2013?><mixed-citation>
Bindoff, N. L., Stott, P. A., AchutaRao, K. M., Allen, M. R., Gillett, N.,
Gutzler, D., Hansingo, K., Hegerl, G., Hu, Y., Jain, S., Mokhov, I. I.,
Overland, J., Perlwitz, J., Sebbari, R., and Zhang, X.: Detection and
Attribution of Climate Change: from Global to Regional, in:
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University
Press, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Boo et al.(2011)Boo, Martin, Sellar, Senior, and Byun</label><?label booetal2011?><mixed-citation>Boo, K., Martin, G., Sellar, A., Senior, C., and Byun, Y.: Evaluating the
East Asian monsoon simulation in climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 116,
D01109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014737" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014737</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Cavalcanti and Shimizu(2012)</label><?label cavalcantiandshimizu2012?><mixed-citation>
Cavalcanti, I. F. A. and Shimizu, M. H.: Climate fields over South America
and variability of SACZ and PSA in HadGEM2-ES, American Journal of
Climate Changes, 1, 132–144, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Cerezo-Mota et al.(2011)Cerezo-Mota, Allen, and
Jones</label><?label cerezomotaetal2011?><mixed-citation>
Cerezo-Mota, R., Allen, M., and Jones, R.: Mechanisms controlling precipitation
in the northern portion of the North American monsoon, J. Climate, 24,
2771–2783, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Christensen et al.(2013)Christensen, Kanikicharla, Aldrian, An,
Cavalcanti, Castro, Dong, Goswami, an d J. K. Kanyanga, Kitoh, Kossin, Lau,
Renwick, Stephenson, Xie, and Zhou</label><?label christensenetal2013?><mixed-citation>
Christensen, J. H., Kanikicharla, K. K., Aldrian, E., An, S., Cavalcanti, I.
F. A., Castro, M., Dong, W., Goswami, P., Kanyanga, J. K., Kitoh,
A., Kossin, J., Lau, N., Renwick, J., Stephenson, D. B., Xie, S., and Zhou,
T.: Climate phenomena and their relevance for future regional climate change,
in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University
Press, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Cook et al.(2014)Cook, Smerdon, Seager, and Coats</label><?label cooketal2014?><mixed-citation>
Cook, B. I., Smerdon, J. E., Seager, R., and Coats, S.: Global warming and 21st
century drying, Clim. Dynam., 43, 2607–2627, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Cook et al.(2010)Cook, Seager, Heim, Vose, Herweijer, and
Woodhouse</label><?label cooketal2010?><mixed-citation>
Cook, E. R., Seager, R., Heim, R. R., Vose, R. S., Herweijer, C., and
Woodhouse, C.: Megadroughts in North America: placing IPCC projections
of hydroclimatic change in a long-term palaeoclimate context, J. Quaternary Sci.,
25, 48–61, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Cook et al.(2019)Cook, Kushnir, Smerdon, Williams, Anchukaitis, and
Wahl</label><?label cooketal2019?><mixed-citation>
Cook, E. R., Kushnir, Y., Smerdon, J. E., Williams, A. P., Anchukaitis, K. J.,
and Wahl, E. R.: A Euro-Mediterranean tree-ring reconstruction of the
winter NAO index since 910 C.E., Clim. Dynam., 53, 1567–1580, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Crowley(2000)</label><?label crowleyetal2000?><mixed-citation>
Crowley, T. J.: Causes of climate change over the past 1000 years, Science,
289, 270–277, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Crowley and Unterman(2013)</label><?label crowleyetal2013?><mixed-citation>Crowley, T. J. and Unterman, M. B.: Technical details concerning development of a 1200 yr proxy index for global volcanism, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 187–197, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-187-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-5-187-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Diaz et al.(2011)Diaz, Trigo, Hughes, Mann, Xoplaki, and
Barriopedro</label><?label diazetal2011?><mixed-citation>
Diaz, H. F., Trigo, R., Hughes, M. K., Mann, M. E., Xoplaki, E., and
Barriopedro, D.: Spatial and temporal characteristics of climate in
Medieval Times revisited, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 1487–1500, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Dufresne et al.(2013)Dufresne, Foujols, Denvil, Caubel, Marti,
Aumont, Balkanski, Bekki, Bellenger, Benshila, Bony, Bopp, Braconnot,
Brockmann, Cadule, Cheruy, Codron, Cozic, Cugnet, de Noblet, Duvel, Ethe,
Fairhead, Fichefet, Flavoni, Friedlingstein, Grandpeix, Guez, Guilyardi,
Hauglustaine, Hourdin, Idelkadi, Ghattas, Joussaume, Kageyama, Krinner,
Labetoulle, Lahellec, Lefebvre, Lefevre, Levy, Li, Lloyd, Lott, Madec,
Mancip, Marchand, Masson, Meurdesoif, Mignot, Musat, Parouty, Polcher, Rio,
Schulz, Swingedouw, Szopa, Talandier, Terray, Viovy, and
Vuichard</label><?label dufresneetal2013?><mixed-citation>
Dufresne, J., Foujols, M., Denvil, S., Caubel, A., Marti, O., Aumont, O.,
Balkanski, Y., Bekki, S., Bellenger, H., Benshila, R., Bony, S., Bopp, L.,
Braconnot, P., Brockmann, P., Cadule, P., Cheruy, F., Codron, F., Cozic, A.,
Cugnet, D., de Noblet, N., Duvel, J., Ethe, C., Fairhead, L., Fichefet, T.,
Flavoni, S., Friedlingstein, P., Grandpeix, J., Guez, L., Guilyardi, E.,
Hauglustaine, D., Hourdin, F., Idelkadi, A., Ghattas, J., Joussaume, S.,
Kageyama, M., Krinner, G., Labetoulle, S., Lahellec, A., Lefebvre, M.,
Lefevre, F., Levy, C., Li, Z. X., Lloyd, J., Lott, F., Madec, G., Mancip, M.,
Marchand, M., Masson, S., Meurdesoif, Y., Mignot, J., Musat, I., Parouty, S.,
Polcher, J., Rio, C., Schulz, M., Swingedouw, D., Szopa, S., Talandier, C.,
Terray, P., Viovy, N., and Vuichard, N.: Climate change projections using the
IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: From CMIP3 to CMIP5, Clim. Dynam.,
40, 2123–2165, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Emile-Geay et al.(2013a)Emile-Geay, Cobb, Mann, and
Wittenberg</label><?label emilegeayetal2013a?><mixed-citation>
Emile-Geay, J., Cobb, K. M., Mann, M. E., and Wittenberg, A. T.: Estimating
Central Equatorial Pacific SST Variability over the Past
Millennium. Part I: Methodology and Validation, J. Climate, 26,
2302–2328, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Emile-Geay et al.(2013b)Emile-Geay, Cobb, Mann, and
Wittenberg</label><?label emilegeayetal2013b?><mixed-citation>
Emile-Geay, J., Cobb, K. M., Mann, M. E., and Wittenberg, A. T.: Estimating
Central Equatorial Pacific SST Variability over the Past
Millennium. Part II: Reconstructions and implications, J.
Climate, 26, 2329–2352, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1305?><ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fern\'{a}ndez-Donado et~al.(2013)Fern\'{a}ndez-Donado, Gonz\'{a}lez-Rouco,
Raible, Ammann, Barriopedro, Garc\'{i}a-Bustamante, Jungclaus, Lorenz,
Luterbacher, Phipps, Servonnat, Swingedouw, Tett, Wagner, Yiou, and
Zorita}}?><label>Fernández-Donado et al.(2013)Fernández-Donado, González-Rouco,
Raible, Ammann, Barriopedro, García-Bustamante, Jungclaus, Lorenz,
Luterbacher, Phipps, Servonnat, Swingedouw, Tett, Wagner, Yiou, and
Zorita</label><?label fernandezdonadoetal2013?><mixed-citation>Fernández-Donado, L., González-Rouco, J. F., Raible, C. C., Ammann, C. M., Barriopedro, D., García-Bustamante, E., Jungclaus, J. H., Lorenz, S. J., Luterbacher, J., Phipps, S. J., Servonnat, J., Swingedouw, D., Tett, S. F. B., Wagner, S., Yiou, P., and Zorita, E.: Large-scale temperature response to external forcing in simulations and reconstructions of the last millennium, Clim. Past, 9, 393–421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-393-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-9-393-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Fischer et al.(2007)Fischer, Luterbacher, Zorita, Tett, Casty, and
Wanner</label><?label fischeretal2007?><mixed-citation>Fischer, E., Luterbacher, J., Zorita, E., Tett, S., Casty, C., and Wanner, H.:
European climate response to tropical volcanic eruptions over the last half
millennium, Geophys. Res. Lett, 34, L05707, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027992" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL027992</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Fogt et al.(2009)Fogt, Perlwitz, Monaghan, Bromwich, Jones, and
Marshall</label><?label fogtetal2009?><mixed-citation>Fogt, R. L., Perlwitz, J., Monaghan, A. J., Bromwich, D. H., Jones, J. M., and
Marshall, G. J.: Historical SAM variability. Part II:
Twentieth-Century variability and trends from reconstructions,
observations, and the IPCC AR4 models, J. Climate, 22, 5346–5365, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2786.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JCLI2786.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Frierson et al.(2007)Frierson, Lu, and Chen</label><?label friersonetal2007?><mixed-citation>Frierson, D. M. W., Lu, J., and Chen, G.: The width of the Hadley Cell in
simple and comprehensive General Circulation Models, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L18804, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL031115</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Gao et al.(2008)Gao, Robock, and Ammann</label><?label gaoetal2008?><mixed-citation>Gao, C., Robock, A., and Ammann, C.: Volcanic forcing of climate over the last
1500 years: An improved ice core-based index for climate models, J. Geophys.
Res., 113, D23111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010239" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010239</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Giorgetta et~al.(2013)Giorgetta, Jungclaus, Reick, Legutke, Bader,
B\"{o}ttinger, Brovkin, Crueger, Esch, Fieg, Glushak, Gayler, Haak, Hollweg,
Ilyina, Kinne, Kornblueh, Matei, Mauritsen, Mikolajewicz, Mueller, Notz,
Pithan, Raddatz, Rast, Redler, Roeckner, Schmidt, Schnur, Segschneider, Six,
Stockhause, Timmreck, Wegner, Widmann, Wieners, Claussen, Marotzke, and
Stevens}}?><label>Giorgetta et al.(2013)Giorgetta, Jungclaus, Reick, Legutke, Bader,
Böttinger, Brovkin, Crueger, Esch, Fieg, Glushak, Gayler, Haak, Hollweg,
Ilyina, Kinne, Kornblueh, Matei, Mauritsen, Mikolajewicz, Mueller, Notz,
Pithan, Raddatz, Rast, Redler, Roeckner, Schmidt, Schnur, Segschneider, Six,
Stockhause, Timmreck, Wegner, Widmann, Wieners, Claussen, Marotzke, and
Stevens</label><?label giorgettaetal2013?><mixed-citation>
Giorgetta, M. A., Jungclaus, J., Reick, C. H., Legutke, S., Bader, J.,
Böttinger, M., Brovkin, V., Crueger, T., Esch, M., Fieg, K., Glushak, K.,
Gayler, V., Haak, H., Hollweg, H., Ilyina, T., Kinne, S., Kornblueh, L.,
Matei, D., Mauritsen, T., Mikolajewicz, U., Mueller, W., Notz, D., Pithan,
F., Raddatz, T., Rast, S., Redler, R., Roeckner, E., Schmidt, H., Schnur, R.,
Segschneider, J., Six, K. D., Stockhause, M., Timmreck, C., Wegner, J.,
Widmann, H., Wieners, K., Claussen, M., Marotzke, J., and Stevens, B.:
Climate and carbon cycle changes from 1850 to 2100 in MPI ESM simulations
for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 5, 572–597, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Gong and Wang(1999)</label><?label gongandwang1999?><mixed-citation>
Gong, D. Y. and Wang, S. W.: Definition of Antarctic Oscillation Index,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 459–462, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Graham et al.(2011)Graham, Ammann, Fleitmann, Cobb, and
Luterbacher</label><?label grahametal2010?><mixed-citation>Graham, N. E., Ammann, C. M., Fleitmann, D., Cobb, K. M., and Luterbacher, J.:
Support for global climate reorganization during the “Medieval Climate
Anomaly”, Clim. Dynam., 7, 1217–1245, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0914-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-010-0914-z</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Jones et al.(2009)Jones, Fogt, Widmann, Marshall, Jones, and
Visbeck</label><?label jonesetal2009?><mixed-citation>Jones, J. M., Fogt, R. L., Widmann, M., Marshall, G. J., Jones, P. D., and
Visbeck, M.: Historical SAM variability. Part I: Century-Length
seasonal reconstructions, J. Climate, 22, 5319–5345, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2785.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JCLI2785.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Jourdain et al.(2013)Jourdain, Gupta, Taschetto, Ummenhofer, Moise,
and Ashok</label><?label jourdainetal2013?><mixed-citation>
Jourdain, N. C., Gupta, A. S., Taschetto, A. S., Ummenhofer, C. C., Moise,
A. F., and Ashok, K.: The Indo-Australian monsoon and its relationship to
ENSO and IOD in reanalysis data and the CMIP3/CMIP5 simulations, Clim.
Dynam., 41, 3073–3102, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Jungclaus et al.(2010)Jungclaus, Lorenz, Timmreck, Reick, Brovkin,
Six, Segschneider, Giorgetta, Crowley, and Pongraz</label><?label jungclausetal2010?><mixed-citation>Jungclaus, J. H., Lorenz, S. J., Timmreck, C., Reick, C. H., Brovkin, V., Six, K., Segschneider, J., Giorgetta, M. A., Crowley, T. J., Pongratz, J., Krivova, N. A., Vieira, L. E., Solanki, S. K., Klocke, D., Botzet, M., Esch, M., Gayler, V., Haak, H., Raddatz, T. J., Roeckner, E., Schnur, R., Widmann, H., Claussen, M., Stevens, B., and Marotzke, J.: Climate and carbon-cycle variability over the last millennium, Clim. Past, 6, 723–737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-6-723-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-6-723-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Lamarque et al.(2010)Lamarque, Bond, Eyring, Granier, Heil, Klimont,
Lee, Liousse, Mieville, Owen, Schultz, Shindell, Smith, Stehfest, van
Aardenne, Cooper, Kainuma, Mahowald, McConnell, Naik, Riahi, and van
Vuuren</label><?label lamarqueetal2010?><mixed-citation>Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z., Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D., Smith, S. J., Stehfest, E., Van Aardenne, J., Cooper, O. R., Kainuma, M., Mahowald, N., McConnell, J. R., Naik, V., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.: Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7017–7039, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Landrum et al.(2013)Landrum, Otto-Bliesner, Wahl, Conley, Lawrence,
Rosenbloom, and Teng</label><?label landrumetal2013?><mixed-citation>
Landrum, L., Otto-Bliesner, B., Wahl, E., Conley, A., Lawrence, P., Rosenbloom,
N., and Teng, H.: Last Millennium Climate and its Variability in
CCSM4, J. Climate, 1, 1085–1111, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Li and Wang(2003)</label><?label liandwang2003?><mixed-citation>Li, J. and Wang, J.: A modified zonal index and its physical sense, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 30, 1632, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017441" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL017441</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ljungqvist et~al.(2016)Ljungqvist, Krusic, Sundqvist, Zorita,
Brattstr\"{o}m, and Frank}}?><label>Ljungqvist et al.(2016)Ljungqvist, Krusic, Sundqvist, Zorita,
Brattström, and Frank</label><?label ljungqvistetal2016?><mixed-citation>
Ljungqvist, F. C., Krusic, P. J., Sundqvist, H. S., Zorita, E., Brattström,
G., and Frank, D.: Northern Hemisphere hydroclimate variability over the past
twelve centuries, Nature, 532, 94–98, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Lu et al.(2007)Lu, Vecchi, and Reichler</label><?label luetal2007?><mixed-citation>Lu, J., Vecchi, G. A., and Reichler, T.: Expansion of the Hadley cell under
global warming, Geophys. Res. Lett, 34, L06805, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028443" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL028443</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Luterbacher et~al.(2012)Luterbacher, Garc\'{i}a-Herrera, Akcer-On,
Allan, Alvarez-Castro, Benito, Booth, B\"{u}ntgen, Cagatay, Colombaroli, Davis,
Esper, Felis, Fleitmann, Frank, Gallego, Garcia-Bustamante, Glaser,
Gonzalez-Rouco, Goosse, Kiefer, Macklin, Manning, Montagna, Newman, Power,
Rath, Ribera, Riemann, Roberts, Sicre, Silenzi, Tinner, Tzedakis,
Valero-Garc\'{e}s, Schrier, Vanni\`{e}re, Vogt, Wanner, Werner, Willett,
Williams, Xoplaki, Zerefos, and Zorita}}?><label>Luterbacher et al.(2012)Luterbacher, García-Herrera, Akcer-On,
Allan, Alvarez-Castro, Benito, Booth, Büntgen, Cagatay, Colombaroli, Davis,
Esper, Felis, Fleitmann, Frank, Gallego, Garcia-Bustamante, Glaser,
Gonzalez-Rouco, Goosse, Kiefer, Macklin, Manning, Montagna, Newman, Power,
Rath, Ribera, Riemann, Roberts, Sicre, Silenzi, Tinner, Tzedakis,
Valero-Garcés, Schrier, Vannière, Vogt, Wanner, Werner, Willett,
Williams, Xoplaki, Zerefos, and Zorita</label><?label luterbacheretal2012?><mixed-citation>
Luterbacher, J., García-Herrera, R., Akcer-On, S., Allan, R., Alvarez-Castro,
M. C., Benito, G., Booth, J., Büntgen, U., Cagatay, N., Colombaroli, D.,
Davis, B., Esper, J., Felis, T., Fleitmann, D., Frank, D., Gallego, D.,
Garcia-Bustamante, E., Glaser, R., Gonzalez-Rouco, F., Goosse, H., Kiefer,
T., Macklin, M. G., Manning, S. W., Montagna, P., Newman, L., Power, M. J.,
Rath, V., Ribera, P., Riemann, D., Roberts, N., Sicre, M. A., Silenzi, S.,
Tinner, W., Tzedakis, P. C., Valero-Garcés, B., Schrier, G., Vannière,
B., Vogt, S., Wanner, H., Werner, J. P., Willett, G., Williams, M. H.,
Xoplaki, E., Zerefos, C. S., and Zorita, E.: A review of 2000 years of
paleoclimatic evidence in the Mediterranean. In: The Climate of the
Mediterranean Region: From the Past to the Future, Elsevier, 1, 87–185,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>MacFarling-Meure et al.(2006)MacFarling-Meure, Etheridge, Trudinger,
Steele, Langenfelds, van Ommen, Smith, and Elkins</label><?label macfarlingetal2006?><mixed-citation>MacFarling-Meure, C., Etheridge, D., Trudinger, C., Steele, P., Langenfelds,
R., van Ommen, T., Smith, A., and Elkins, J.: Law Dome <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ice core records extended to 2000 years BP, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 33, L14810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026152" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL026152</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Mankin et al.(2019)Mankin, Seager, Smerdon, Cook, and
Williams</label><?label mankinetal2019?><mixed-citation>
Mankin, J. S., Seager, R., Smerdon, J. E., Cook, B. I., and Williams, A. P.:
Mid-latitude freshwater availability reduced by projected vegetation
responses to climate change, Nat. Geosci., 12, 983–988, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Mann et al.(2009)Mann, Zhang, Rutherford, Bradley, Hughes, Shindell,
Ammann, Faluvegi, and Ni</label><?label mannetal2009?><mixed-citation>
Mann, M. E., Zhang, Z., Rutherford, S., Bradley, R. S., Hughes, M. K.,
Shindell, D., Ammann, C., Faluvegi, G., and Ni, F.: Global signatures and
dynamical origins of the Little Ice Age and Medieval Climate
Anomaly, Science, 326, 1256–1260, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Masson-Delmotte et al.(2013)Masson-Delmotte, Schulz, Abe-Ouchi, Beer,
Ganopolski, Rouco, Jansen, Lambeck, Luterbacher, Naish, Osborn,
Otto-Bliesner, Quinn, Ramesh, Rojas, Shao, and
Timmermann</label><?label massondelmotteetal2013?><mixed-citation>
Masson-Delmotte, V., Schulz, M., Abe-Ouchi, A., Beer, J., Ganopolski, A.,
Rouco, J. F. G., Jansen, E., Lambeck, K., Luterbacher, J., Naish, T., Osborn,
T., Otto-Bliesner, B., Quinn, T., Ramesh, R., Rojas, M., Shao, X., and
Timmermann, A.: Information from Paleoclimate Archives, in: Climate
Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group
I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>May(2011)</label><?label may2011?><mixed-citation>
May, W.: The sensitivity of the Indian summer monsoon to a global warming of
2ºC with respect to pre-industrial times, Clim. Dynam., 37, 1843–1868,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1306?><ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Miller et~al.(2012)Miller, Geirsd\'{o}ttir, Zhong, Larsen,
Otto-Bliesner, Holland, Bailey, Refsnider, Lehman, Southon, Anderson,
Bj\"{o}rnsson, and Thordarson}}?><label>Miller et al.(2012)Miller, Geirsdóttir, Zhong, Larsen,
Otto-Bliesner, Holland, Bailey, Refsnider, Lehman, Southon, Anderson,
Björnsson, and Thordarson</label><?label milleretal2012?><mixed-citation>Miller, G. H., Geirsdóttir, A., Zhong, Y., Larsen, D. J., Otto-Bliesner,
B. L., Holland, M. M. ., Bailey, D. A., Refsnider, K. A., Lehman, S. J.,
Southon, J. R., Anderson, C., Björnsson, H., and Thordarson, T.: Abrupt
onset of the Little Ice Age triggered by volcanism and sustained by
sea-ice/ocean feedbacks, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L02708, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050168" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL050168</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Neukom et~al.(2014)Neukom, Gergis, Karoly, Wanner, Curran, Elbert,
Gonz\'{a}lez-Rouco, Linsley, Moy, Mundo, Raible, Steig, van Ommen, Vance,
Villalba, Zinke, and Frank}}?><label>Neukom et al.(2014)Neukom, Gergis, Karoly, Wanner, Curran, Elbert,
González-Rouco, Linsley, Moy, Mundo, Raible, Steig, van Ommen, Vance,
Villalba, Zinke, and Frank</label><?label neukometal2014?><mixed-citation>
Neukom, R., Gergis, J., Karoly, D. J., Wanner, H., Curran, M., Elbert, J.,
González-Rouco, F., Linsley, B. K., Moy, A. D., Mundo, I., Raible, C. C.,
Steig, E. J., van Ommen, T., Vance, T., Villalba, R., Zinke, J., and Frank,
D.: Inter-hemispheric temperature variability over the past millennium,
Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 362–367, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Neukom et~al.(2019)Neukom, Steiger, G\'{o}mez-Navarro, Wang, and
Werner}}?><label>Neukom et al.(2019)Neukom, Steiger, Gómez-Navarro, Wang, and
Werner</label><?label neukometal2019?><mixed-citation>
Neukom, R., Steiger, N., Gómez-Navarro, J. J., Wang, J., and Werner, J. P.:
No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the
preindustrial Common Era, Nature, 571, 550–554, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Newton et al.(2006)Newton, Thunell, and Stott</label><?label newtonetal2006?><mixed-citation>Newton, A., Thunell, R., and Stott, L.: Climate and hydrographic variability in
the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool during the last millennium, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 33, L19710, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027234" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL027234</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ortega et~al.(2013)Ortega, Montoya, Gonz\'{a}lez-Rouco, Beltrami, and
Swingedouw}}?><label>Ortega et al.(2013)Ortega, Montoya, González-Rouco, Beltrami, and
Swingedouw</label><?label ortegaetal2013?><mixed-citation>Ortega, P., Montoya, M., González-Rouco, F., Beltrami, H., and Swingedouw, D.: Variability of the ocean heat content during the last millennium – an assessment with the ECHO-g Model, Clim. Past, 9, 547–565, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-547-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-9-547-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Otto-Bliesner et al.(2015)Otto-Bliesner, Brady, Fasullo, Jahn,
Landrum, Stevenson, Rosenbloom, Mai, and Strand</label><?label ottoetal2015?><mixed-citation>Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Brady, E. C., Fasullo, J., Jahn, A., Landrum, L.,
Stevenson, S., Rosenbloom, N., Mai, A., and Strand, G.: Climate variability
and change since 850 C.E.: An ensemble approach with the Community
Earth System Model (CESM), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 735–754, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00233.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00233.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>PAGES2k-PMIP3 group(2015)</label><?label pages2k2015?><mixed-citation>PAGES 2k-PMIP3 group: Continental-scale temperature variability in PMIP3 simulations and PAGES 2k regional temperature reconstructions over the past millennium, Clim. Past, 11, 1673–1699, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-1673-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-11-1673-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Palmer(1965)</label><?label palmer1965?><mixed-citation>
Palmer, W.: Meteorologic drought, U.S. Weather Bureau, Res. Pap. No. 45, 58,
1965.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Phipps et al.(2012)Phipps, Rotstayn, Gordon, Roberts, Hirst, and
Budd</label><?label phippsetal2012?><mixed-citation>Phipps, S. J., Rotstayn, L. D., Gordon, H. B., Roberts, J. L., Hirst, A. C., and Budd, W. F.: The CSIRO Mk3L climate system model version 1.0 – Part 2: Response to external forcings, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 649–682, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-649-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-649-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Pongratz et al.(2008)Pongratz, Reick, Raddatz, and
Claussen</label><?label pongratzetal2008?><mixed-citation>Pongratz, J., Reick, C. H., Raddatz, T., and Claussen, M.: A reconstruction of
global agricultural areas and land cover for the last millennium, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB3018, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003153" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GB003153</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Sachs et al.(2009)Sachs, Sachse, Smittenberg, Zhang, Battisti, and
Golubic</label><?label sachsetal2009?><mixed-citation>
Sachs, J. P., Sachse, D., Smittenberg, R. H., Zhang, Z. H., Battisti, D. S.,
and Golubic, S.: Southward movement of the Pacific intertropical
convergence zone AD 1400–1850, Nat. Geosci., 2, 519–525, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Schmidt et al.(2006)Schmidt, Ruedy, Hansen, Aleinov, Bell, Bauer,
Bauer, Cairns, Canuto, Cheng, Genio, Faluvegi, Friend, Hall, Hu, Kelley,
Kiang, Koch, Lacis, Lerner, Lo, Miller, Nazarenko, Oinas, Perlwitz, Perlwitz,
Rind, Romanou, Russell, Sato, Shindell, Stone, Sun, Tausnev, Thresher, , and
Yao</label><?label schmidtetal2006?><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, G., Ruedy, R., Hansen, J., Aleinov, I., Bell, N., Bauer, M., Bauer,
S., Cairns, B., Canuto, V., Cheng, Y., Genio, A. D., Faluvegi, G., Friend,
A., Hall, T., Hu, Y., Kelley, M., Kiang, N., Koch, D., Lacis, A., Lerner, J.,
Lo, K., Miller, R., Nazarenko, L., Oinas, V., Perlwitz, J., Perlwitz, J.,
Rind, D., Romanou, A., Russell, G., Sato, M., Shindell, D., Stone, P., Sun,
S., Tausnev, N., Thresher, D.,  and Yao, M.: Present day atmospheric
simulations using GISS ModelE: Comparison to in-situ, satellite and
reanalysis data, J. Climate, 19, 153–192, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Schmidt et al.(2014)Schmidt, Kelley, Nazarenko, Ruedy, Russell,
Aleinov, Bauer, Bauer, Bhat, Bleck, Canuto, Chen, Cheng, Clune, Genio,
de Fainchtein, Faluvegi, Hansen, Healy, Kiang, Koch, Lacis, LeGrande, Lerner,
Lo, Matthews, Menon, Miller, Oinas, Oloso, Perlwitz, Puma, Putman, Rind,
Romanou, Sato, Shindell, Sun, Syed, Tausnev, Tsigaridis, Unger, Voulgarakis,
Yao, and Zhang</label><?label schmidtetal2014?><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, G., Kelley, M., Nazarenko, L., Ruedy, R., Russell, G., Aleinov, I.,
Bauer, M., Bauer, S., Bhat, M., Bleck, R., Canuto, V., Chen, Y., Cheng, Y.,
Clune, T., Genio, A. D., de Fainchtein, R., Faluvegi, G., Hansen, J., Healy,
R., Kiang, N., Koch, D., Lacis, A., LeGrande, A., Lerner, J., Lo, K.,
Matthews, E., Menon, S., Miller, R., Oinas, V., Oloso, A., Perlwitz, J.,
Puma, M., Putman, W., Rind, D., Romanou, A., Sato, M., Shindell, D., Sun, S.,
Syed, R., Tausnev, N., Tsigaridis, K., Unger, N., Voulgarakis, A., Yao, M.,
and Zhang, J.: Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2
contributions to the CMIP5 archive, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 6,
141–184, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Schmidt et al.(2011)Schmidt, Jungclaus, Ammann, Bard, Braconnot,
Crowley, Delaygue, Joos, Krivova, Muscheler, Otto-Bliesner, Pongratz,
Shindell, Solanki, Steinhilber, and Vieira</label><?label schmidtetal2011?><mixed-citation>Schmidt, G. A., Jungclaus, J. H., Ammann, C. M., Bard, E., Braconnot, P., Crowley, T. J., Delaygue, G., Joos, F., Krivova, N. A., Muscheler, R., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Pongratz, J., Shindell, D. T., Solanki, S. K., Steinhilber, F., and Vieira, L. E. A.: Climate forcing reconstructions for use in PMIP simulations of the last millennium (v1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 33–45, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-33-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-4-33-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Schmidt et al.(2012)Schmidt, Jungclaus, Ammann, Bard, Braconnot,
Crowley, Delaygue, Joos, Krivova, Muscheler, Otto-Bliesner, Pongratz,
Shindell, Solanki, Steinhilber, and Vieira</label><?label schmidtetal2012?><mixed-citation>Schmidt, G. A., Jungclaus, J. H., Ammann, C. M., Bard, E., Braconnot, P., Crowley, T. J., Delaygue, G., Joos, F., Krivova, N. A., Muscheler, R., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Pongratz, J., Shindell, D. T., Solanki, S. K., Steinhilber, F., and Vieira, L. E. A.: Climate forcing reconstructions for use in PMIP simulations of the Last Millennium (v1.1), Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 185–191, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-185-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-185-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Schurer et al.(2013)Schurer, Hegerl, Mann, Tett, and
Phipps</label><?label schureretal2013?><mixed-citation>
Schurer, A. P., Hegerl, G. C., Mann, M. E., Tett, S. F. B., and Phipps, S. J.:
Separating forced from chaotic climate variability over the past millennium,
J. Climate, 26, 6954–6973, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Seager et al.(2007)Seager, Ting, Held, Kushnir, Lu, Vecchi, Huang,
Harnik, Leetmaa, Lau, Li, Velez, and Naik</label><?label seageretal2007?><mixed-citation>
Seager, R., Ting, M., Held, I., Kushnir, Y., Lu, J., Vecchi, G., Huang, H.,
Harnik, N., Leetmaa, A., Lau, N., Li, C., Velez, J., and Naik, N.: Model
projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in
Southwestern North America, Science, 316, 1181–1184, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Smerdon et al.(2015)Smerdon, Cook, Cook, and
Seager</label><?label smerdonetal2015?><mixed-citation>
Smerdon, J. E., Cook, B. I., Cook, E. R., and Seager, R.: Bridging Past and
Future Climate across Paleoclimatic Reconstructions, Observations, and
Models: A Hydroclimate Case Study, J. Climate, 28, 3212–3231, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Steinhilber et~al.(2009)Steinhilber, Beer, and
Fr\"{o}hlich}}?><label>Steinhilber et al.(2009)Steinhilber, Beer, and
Fröhlich</label><?label steinhilberetal2009?><mixed-citation>Steinhilber, F., Beer, J., and Fröhlich, C.: Total solar irradiance during
the Holocene, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L19704, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040142" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL040142</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Steinman et al.(2013)Steinman, Abbott, Mann, Stansell, and
Finney</label><?label steinmanetal2013?><mixed-citation>
Steinman, B. A., Abbott, M. B., Mann, M. E., Stansell, N. D., and Finney,
B. P.: 1,500 year quantitative reconstruction of winter precipitation in the
Pacific Northwest, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 11619–11623, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Stephenson et al.(2006)Stephenson, Pavan, Collins, Junge, and
Quadrelli</label><?label stephensonetal2006?><mixed-citation>
Stephenson, D., Pavan, V., Collins, M., Junge, M., and Quadrelli, R.: North
Atlantic Oscillation response to transient greenhouse gas forcing and the
impact on European winter climate: A CMIP2 multi-model assessment,
Clim. Dynam., 27, 401–420, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Stocker et~al.(2013)Stocker, Qin, Plattner, Alexander, Allen,
Bindoff, Br\'{e}on, Church, Cubasch, Emori, Forster, Friedlingstein, Gillett,
Gregory, Hartmann, Jansen, Kirtman, Knutti, Kumar, Lemke, Marotzke,
Masson-Delmotte, Meehl, Mokhov, Piao, Ramaswamy, Randall, Rhein, Rojas,
Sabine, Shindell, Talley, Vaughan, and Xie}}?><label>Stocker et al.(2013)Stocker, Qin, Plattner, Alexander, Allen,
Bindoff, Bréon, Church, Cubasch, Emori, Forster, Friedlingstein, Gillett,
Gregory, Hartmann, Jansen, Kirtman, Knutti, Kumar, Lemke, Marotzke,
Masson-Delmotte, Meehl, Mokhov, Piao, Ramaswamy, Randall, Rhein, Rojas,
Sabine, Shindell, Talley, Vaughan, and Xie</label><?label stockeretal2013?><mixed-citation>
Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G. K., Alexander, L. V., Allen, S. K.,
Bindoff, N. L., Bréon, F. M., Church, J. A., Cubasch, U., Emori, S.,
Forster, P., Friedlingstein, P., Gillett, N., Gregory, J. M., Hartmann,
D. L., Jansen, E., Kirtman, B., Knutti, R., Kumar, K. K., Lemke, P.,
Marotzke, J., Masson-Delmotte, V., Meehl, G. A., Mokhov, I. I., Piao, S.,
Ramaswamy, V., Randall, D., Rhein, M., Rojas, M., Sabine, C., Shindell, D.,
Talley, L. D., Vaughan, D. G., and Xie, S. P.: Technical Summary, in:
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University
Press, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Tardif et al.(2019)Tardif, Hakim, Perkins, Horlick, Erb, Emile-Geay,
Anderson, Steig, and Noone</label><?label tardifetal2019?><mixed-citation>Tardif, R., Hakim, G. J., Perkins, W. A., Horlick, K. A., Erb, M. P., Emile-Geay, J., Anderson, D. M., Steig, E. J., and Noone, D.: Last Millennium Reanalysis with an <?pagebreak page1307?>expanded proxy database and seasonal proxy modeling, Clim. Past, 15, 1251–1273, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1251-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-15-1251-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Taylor et al.(2007)Taylor, Parker, and Harris</label><?label tayloretal2007?><mixed-citation>Taylor, C. M., Parker, D. J., and Harris, P. P.: An observational case study of
mesoscale atmospheric circulations induced by soil moisture, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L15801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030572" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL030572</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tett et~al.(2007)Tett, Betts, Crowley, Timothy, Johns, Jones, Osborn,
\"{O}str\"{o}m, Roberts, and Woodage}}?><label>Tett et al.(2007)Tett, Betts, Crowley, Timothy, Johns, Jones, Osborn,
Öström, Roberts, and Woodage</label><?label tettetal2007?><mixed-citation>
Tett, S., Betts, R., Crowley, T., Timothy, J., Johns, C., Jones, A., Osborn,
T., Öström, E., Roberts, D., and Woodage, M.: The impact of natural and
anthropogenic forcings on climate and hydrology since 1550, Clim. Dynam., 28,
3–34, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Thompson and Wallace(2001)</label><?label thompsonandwallace2001?><mixed-citation>
Thompson, D. W. J. and Wallace, J. M.: Regional Climate Impacts of the
Northern Hemisphere Annular Mode, Science, 293, 85–89, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Thornthwaite(1948)</label><?label thornthwaite1948?><mixed-citation>
Thornthwaite, C. W.: An approach toward a rational classification of climate,
Geogr. Rev., 38, 55–94, 1948.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Trouet et al.(2009)Trouet, Esper, Graham, Baker, Scourse, and
Frank</label><?label trouetetal2009?><mixed-citation>Trouet, V., Esper, J., Graham, N. E., Baker, A., Scourse, J. D., and Frank,
D. C.: Persistent Positive North Atlantic Oscillation Mode Dominated
the Medieval Climate Anomaly, Science, 324, 78–80, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1166349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1166349</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Vial et al.(2013)Vial, Dufresne, and Bony</label><?label vialetal2013?><mixed-citation>
Vial, J., Dufresne, J. L., and Bony, S.: On the interpretation of inter-model
spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates, Clim. Dynam., 41, 3339–3362,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Vieira et al.(2011)Vieira, Solanki, Krivova, and
Usoskin</label><?label vieiraetal2011?><mixed-citation>Vieira, L. E. A., Solanki, S. K., Krivova, N. A., and Usoskin, I.: Evolution of
the solar irradiance during the Holocene, Astron. Astrophys., 531, A6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015843" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/0004-6361/201015843</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Vuille et al.(2012)Vuille, Burns, Taylor, Cruz, Bird, Abbott, Kanner,
Cheng, and Novello</label><?label vuilleetal2012?><mixed-citation>Vuille, M., Burns, S. J., Taylor, B. L., Cruz, F. W., Bird, B. W., Abbott, M. B., Kanner, L. C., Cheng, H., and Novello, V. F.: A review of the South American monsoon history as recorded in stable isotopic proxies over the past two millennia, Clim. Past, 8, 1309–1321, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-1309-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-8-1309-2012</ext-link>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Wang et al.(2005)Wang, Cheng, Edwards, He, Kong, An, Wu, Kelly,
Dykoski, and Li</label><?label wangetal2005?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., He, Y., Kong, X., An, Z., Wu, J., Kelly,
M. J., Dykoski, C. A., and Li, X.: The Holocene Asian monsoon: links to
solar changes and North Atlantic climate, Science, 308, 854–857, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1106296</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Wells et al.(2004)Wells, Goddard, and Hayes</label><?label wellsetal2004?><mixed-citation>
Wells, N., Goddard, S., and Hayes, M. J.: A self-calibrating Palmer Drought
Severity Index, J. Climate, 17, 2335–2351, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Widlansky et al.(2011)Widlansky, Webster, and
Hoyos</label><?label widlanskyetal2011?><mixed-citation>
Widlansky, M. J., Webster, P. J., and Hoyos, C. D.: On the location and
orientation of the South Pacific Convergence Zone, Clim. Dynam., 36,
561–578, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wilson et~al.(2016)Wilson, Anchukaitis, Briffa, B\"{u}ntgen, Cook,
D'Arrigo, Davi, Esper, Frank, Gunnarson, Hegerl, Helama, Klesse, Krusic,
Linderholm, Myglano, Osborn, Rydval, and Zorita}}?><label>Wilson et al.(2016)Wilson, Anchukaitis, Briffa, Büntgen, Cook,
D'Arrigo, Davi, Esper, Frank, Gunnarson, Hegerl, Helama, Klesse, Krusic,
Linderholm, Myglano, Osborn, Rydval, and Zorita</label><?label wilsonetal2016?><mixed-citation>
Wilson, R., Anchukaitis, K., Briffa, K. R., Büntgen, U., Cook, E., D'Arrigo,
R., Davi, N., Esper, J., Frank, D., Gunnarson, B., Hegerl, G., Helama, S.,
Klesse, S., Krusic, P. J., Linderholm, H. W., Myglano, V., Osborn, T. J.,
Rydval, M., and Zorita, E.: Last millennium northern hemisphere summer
temperatures from tree rings: Part I: The long term context, Quaternary Sci.
Rev., 134, 1–18, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Xie et al.(2007)Xie, Miyama, Wang, Xu, de Szoeke, Small, Richards,
Mochizuki, and Awaji</label><?label xieetal2007?><mixed-citation>
Xie, P., Miyama, T., Wang, Y., Xu, H., de Szoeke, S. P., Small, R. J. O.,
Richards, K. J., Mochizuki, T., and Awaji, T.: A regional ocean-atmosphere
model for eastern Pacific climate, J. Climate, 20, 1504–1522,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Yukimoto et al.(2011)Yukimoto, Yoshimura, Hosaka, Sakami, Tsujino,
Hirabara, Tanaka, Deushi, Obata, Nakano, Adachi, Shindo, Yabu, Ose, and
Kitoh</label><?label yukimotoetal2011?><mixed-citation>
Yukimoto, S., Yoshimura, H., Hosaka, M., Sakami, T., Tsujino, H., Hirabara, M.,
Tanaka, T. Y., Deushi, M., Obata, A., Nakano, H., Adachi, Y., Shindo, E.,
Yabu, S., Ose, T., and Kitoh, A.: Meteorological Research Institute –
Earth System Model Version 1 (MRI-ESM1) – Model Description,
Tech. Rep. of the Met. Res. Inst., 64, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zorita et~al.(2005)Zorita, Gonz\'{a}lez-Rouco, von Storch, Mont\'{a}vez,
and Valero}}?><label>Zorita et al.(2005)Zorita, González-Rouco, von Storch, Montávez,
and Valero</label><?label zoritaetal2005?><mixed-citation>Zorita, E., González-Rouco, J. F., von Storch, H., Montávez, J. P., and
Valero, F.: Natural and anthropogenic modes of surface temperature variations
in the last thousand years, Geophys. Res. Lett, 32, L08707, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021563" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL021563</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Dynamical and hydrological changes in climate simulations of the last millennium</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Simulations of climate of the last millennium (LM) show that external forcing had a major contribution to the evolution of temperatures; warmer and colder periods like the Medieval Climate Anomaly (MCA; ca. 950–1250&thinsp;CE) and the Little Ice Age (LIA; ca. 1450–1850&thinsp;CE) were critically influenced by changes in solar and volcanic activity. Even if this influence is mainly observed in terms of temperatures, evidence from simulations and reconstructions shows that other variables related to atmospheric dynamics and hydroclimate were also influenced by external forcing over some regions. In this work, simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 and Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP5/PMIP3) are analyzed to explore the influence of external forcings on the dynamical and hydrological changes during the LM at different spatial and temporal scales. Principal component (PC) analysis is used to obtain the modes of variability governing the global evolution of climate and to assess their correlation with the total external forcing at multidecadal to multicentennial timescales. For shorter timescales, a composite analysis is used to address the response to specific events of external forcing like volcanic eruptions. The results show coordinated long-term changes in global circulation patterns, which suggest expansions and contractions of the Hadley cells and latitudinal displacements of westerlies in response to external forcing. For hydroclimate, spatial patterns of drier and wetter conditions in areas influenced by the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), Northern Annular Mode (NAM), and Southern Annular Mode (SAM) and alterations in the intensity and distribution of monsoons and convergence zones are consistently found. Similarly, a clear short-term response is found in the years following volcanic eruptions. Although external forcing has a greater influence on temperatures, the results suggest that dynamical and hydrological variations over the LM exhibit a direct response to external forcing at both long and short timescales that is highly dependent on the particular simulation and model.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Adachi et al.(2013)Adachi, Yukimoto, Deushi, Obata, Nakano, Tanaka,
Hosaka, Sakami, Yoshimura, Hirabara, Shindo, Tsujino, Mizuta, Yabu, Koshiro,
Ose, and Kitoh</label><mixed-citation>
Adachi, Y., Yukimoto, S., Deushi, M., Obata, A., Nakano, H., Tanaka, T. Y.,
Hosaka, M., Sakami, T., Yoshimura, H., Hirabara, M., Shindo, E., Tsujino, H.,
Mizuta, R., Yabu, S., Koshiro, T., Ose, T., and Kitoh, A.: Basic performance
of a new earth system model of the Meteorological Research Institute
(MRI-ESM1), Pap. Meteorol. Geophys., 64, 1–19, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Anchukaitis et al.(2017)Anchukaitis, Wilson, Briffa, Büntgen, Cook,
D'Arrigo, Davi, Esper, Frank, Gunnarson, Hegerl, Helama, Klesse, Krusic,
Linderholm, Myglano, Osborn, Zhang, and Zorita</label><mixed-citation>
Anchukaitis, K., Wilson, R., Briffa, K. R., Büntgen, U., Cook, E., D'Arrigo,
R., Davi, N., Esper, J., Frank, D., Gunnarson, B. E., Hegerl, G., Helama, S.,
Klesse, S., Krusic, P. J., Linderholm, H. W., Myglano, V., Osborn, T. J.,
Zhang, P., and Zorita, E.: Last millennium Northern Hemisphere summer
temperatures from tree rings: Part II, spatially resolved
reconstructions, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 163, 1–22, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Anchukaitis and Tierney(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Anchukaitis, K. J. and Tierney, J. E.: Identifying coherent spatiotemporal
modes in time-uncertain proxy paleoclimate records, Clim. Dynam., 41,
1291–1306, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Berger(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
Berger, A.: Long-term variations of daily insolation and Quaternary climatic
changes, J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 2363–2367, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bindoff et al.(2013)Bindoff, Stott, AchutaRao, Allen, Gillett,
Gutzler, Hansingo, Hegerl, Hu, Jain, Mokhov, Overland, Perlwitz, Sebbari, and
Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Bindoff, N. L., Stott, P. A., AchutaRao, K. M., Allen, M. R., Gillett, N.,
Gutzler, D., Hansingo, K., Hegerl, G., Hu, Y., Jain, S., Mokhov, I. I.,
Overland, J., Perlwitz, J., Sebbari, R., and Zhang, X.: Detection and
Attribution of Climate Change: from Global to Regional, in:
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University
Press, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Boo et al.(2011)Boo, Martin, Sellar, Senior, and Byun</label><mixed-citation>
Boo, K., Martin, G., Sellar, A., Senior, C., and Byun, Y.: Evaluating the
East Asian monsoon simulation in climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 116,
D01109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014737" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014737</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Cavalcanti and Shimizu(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Cavalcanti, I. F. A. and Shimizu, M. H.: Climate fields over South America
and variability of SACZ and PSA in HadGEM2-ES, American Journal of
Climate Changes, 1, 132–144, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Cerezo-Mota et al.(2011)Cerezo-Mota, Allen, and
Jones</label><mixed-citation>
Cerezo-Mota, R., Allen, M., and Jones, R.: Mechanisms controlling precipitation
in the northern portion of the North American monsoon, J. Climate, 24,
2771–2783, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Christensen et al.(2013)Christensen, Kanikicharla, Aldrian, An,
Cavalcanti, Castro, Dong, Goswami, an d J. K. Kanyanga, Kitoh, Kossin, Lau,
Renwick, Stephenson, Xie, and Zhou</label><mixed-citation>
Christensen, J. H., Kanikicharla, K. K., Aldrian, E., An, S., Cavalcanti, I.
F. A., Castro, M., Dong, W., Goswami, P., Kanyanga, J. K., Kitoh,
A., Kossin, J., Lau, N., Renwick, J., Stephenson, D. B., Xie, S., and Zhou,
T.: Climate phenomena and their relevance for future regional climate change,
in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University
Press, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Cook et al.(2014)Cook, Smerdon, Seager, and Coats</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, B. I., Smerdon, J. E., Seager, R., and Coats, S.: Global warming and 21st
century drying, Clim. Dynam., 43, 2607–2627, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Cook et al.(2010)Cook, Seager, Heim, Vose, Herweijer, and
Woodhouse</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, E. R., Seager, R., Heim, R. R., Vose, R. S., Herweijer, C., and
Woodhouse, C.: Megadroughts in North America: placing IPCC projections
of hydroclimatic change in a long-term palaeoclimate context, J. Quaternary Sci.,
25, 48–61, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Cook et al.(2019)Cook, Kushnir, Smerdon, Williams, Anchukaitis, and
Wahl</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, E. R., Kushnir, Y., Smerdon, J. E., Williams, A. P., Anchukaitis, K. J.,
and Wahl, E. R.: A Euro-Mediterranean tree-ring reconstruction of the
winter NAO index since 910 C.E., Clim. Dynam., 53, 1567–1580, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Crowley(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Crowley, T. J.: Causes of climate change over the past 1000 years, Science,
289, 270–277, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Crowley and Unterman(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Crowley, T. J. and Unterman, M. B.: Technical details concerning development of a 1200 yr proxy index for global volcanism, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 187–197, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-187-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-187-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Diaz et al.(2011)Diaz, Trigo, Hughes, Mann, Xoplaki, and
Barriopedro</label><mixed-citation>
Diaz, H. F., Trigo, R., Hughes, M. K., Mann, M. E., Xoplaki, E., and
Barriopedro, D.: Spatial and temporal characteristics of climate in
Medieval Times revisited, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 1487–1500, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Dufresne et al.(2013)Dufresne, Foujols, Denvil, Caubel, Marti,
Aumont, Balkanski, Bekki, Bellenger, Benshila, Bony, Bopp, Braconnot,
Brockmann, Cadule, Cheruy, Codron, Cozic, Cugnet, de Noblet, Duvel, Ethe,
Fairhead, Fichefet, Flavoni, Friedlingstein, Grandpeix, Guez, Guilyardi,
Hauglustaine, Hourdin, Idelkadi, Ghattas, Joussaume, Kageyama, Krinner,
Labetoulle, Lahellec, Lefebvre, Lefevre, Levy, Li, Lloyd, Lott, Madec,
Mancip, Marchand, Masson, Meurdesoif, Mignot, Musat, Parouty, Polcher, Rio,
Schulz, Swingedouw, Szopa, Talandier, Terray, Viovy, and
Vuichard</label><mixed-citation>
Dufresne, J., Foujols, M., Denvil, S., Caubel, A., Marti, O., Aumont, O.,
Balkanski, Y., Bekki, S., Bellenger, H., Benshila, R., Bony, S., Bopp, L.,
Braconnot, P., Brockmann, P., Cadule, P., Cheruy, F., Codron, F., Cozic, A.,
Cugnet, D., de Noblet, N., Duvel, J., Ethe, C., Fairhead, L., Fichefet, T.,
Flavoni, S., Friedlingstein, P., Grandpeix, J., Guez, L., Guilyardi, E.,
Hauglustaine, D., Hourdin, F., Idelkadi, A., Ghattas, J., Joussaume, S.,
Kageyama, M., Krinner, G., Labetoulle, S., Lahellec, A., Lefebvre, M.,
Lefevre, F., Levy, C., Li, Z. X., Lloyd, J., Lott, F., Madec, G., Mancip, M.,
Marchand, M., Masson, S., Meurdesoif, Y., Mignot, J., Musat, I., Parouty, S.,
Polcher, J., Rio, C., Schulz, M., Swingedouw, D., Szopa, S., Talandier, C.,
Terray, P., Viovy, N., and Vuichard, N.: Climate change projections using the
IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: From CMIP3 to CMIP5, Clim. Dynam.,
40, 2123–2165, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Emile-Geay et al.(2013a)Emile-Geay, Cobb, Mann, and
Wittenberg</label><mixed-citation>
Emile-Geay, J., Cobb, K. M., Mann, M. E., and Wittenberg, A. T.: Estimating
Central Equatorial Pacific SST Variability over the Past
Millennium. Part I: Methodology and Validation, J. Climate, 26,
2302–2328, 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Emile-Geay et al.(2013b)Emile-Geay, Cobb, Mann, and
Wittenberg</label><mixed-citation>
Emile-Geay, J., Cobb, K. M., Mann, M. E., and Wittenberg, A. T.: Estimating
Central Equatorial Pacific SST Variability over the Past
Millennium. Part II: Reconstructions and implications, J.
Climate, 26, 2329–2352, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Fernández-Donado et al.(2013)Fernández-Donado, González-Rouco,
Raible, Ammann, Barriopedro, García-Bustamante, Jungclaus, Lorenz,
Luterbacher, Phipps, Servonnat, Swingedouw, Tett, Wagner, Yiou, and
Zorita</label><mixed-citation>
Fernández-Donado, L., González-Rouco, J. F., Raible, C. C., Ammann, C. M., Barriopedro, D., García-Bustamante, E., Jungclaus, J. H., Lorenz, S. J., Luterbacher, J., Phipps, S. J., Servonnat, J., Swingedouw, D., Tett, S. F. B., Wagner, S., Yiou, P., and Zorita, E.: Large-scale temperature response to external forcing in simulations and reconstructions of the last millennium, Clim. Past, 9, 393–421, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-393-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-393-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Fischer et al.(2007)Fischer, Luterbacher, Zorita, Tett, Casty, and
Wanner</label><mixed-citation>
Fischer, E., Luterbacher, J., Zorita, E., Tett, S., Casty, C., and Wanner, H.:
European climate response to tropical volcanic eruptions over the last half
millennium, Geophys. Res. Lett, 34, L05707, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027992" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027992</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Fogt et al.(2009)Fogt, Perlwitz, Monaghan, Bromwich, Jones, and
Marshall</label><mixed-citation>
Fogt, R. L., Perlwitz, J., Monaghan, A. J., Bromwich, D. H., Jones, J. M., and
Marshall, G. J.: Historical SAM variability. Part II:
Twentieth-Century variability and trends from reconstructions,
observations, and the IPCC AR4 models, J. Climate, 22, 5346–5365, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2786.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2786.1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Frierson et al.(2007)Frierson, Lu, and Chen</label><mixed-citation>
Frierson, D. M. W., Lu, J., and Chen, G.: The width of the Hadley Cell in
simple and comprehensive General Circulation Models, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L18804, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031115</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Gao et al.(2008)Gao, Robock, and Ammann</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, C., Robock, A., and Ammann, C.: Volcanic forcing of climate over the last
1500 years: An improved ice core-based index for climate models, J. Geophys.
Res., 113, D23111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010239" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010239</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Giorgetta et al.(2013)Giorgetta, Jungclaus, Reick, Legutke, Bader,
Böttinger, Brovkin, Crueger, Esch, Fieg, Glushak, Gayler, Haak, Hollweg,
Ilyina, Kinne, Kornblueh, Matei, Mauritsen, Mikolajewicz, Mueller, Notz,
Pithan, Raddatz, Rast, Redler, Roeckner, Schmidt, Schnur, Segschneider, Six,
Stockhause, Timmreck, Wegner, Widmann, Wieners, Claussen, Marotzke, and
Stevens</label><mixed-citation>
Giorgetta, M. A., Jungclaus, J., Reick, C. H., Legutke, S., Bader, J.,
Böttinger, M., Brovkin, V., Crueger, T., Esch, M., Fieg, K., Glushak, K.,
Gayler, V., Haak, H., Hollweg, H., Ilyina, T., Kinne, S., Kornblueh, L.,
Matei, D., Mauritsen, T., Mikolajewicz, U., Mueller, W., Notz, D., Pithan,
F., Raddatz, T., Rast, S., Redler, R., Roeckner, E., Schmidt, H., Schnur, R.,
Segschneider, J., Six, K. D., Stockhause, M., Timmreck, C., Wegner, J.,
Widmann, H., Wieners, K., Claussen, M., Marotzke, J., and Stevens, B.:
Climate and carbon cycle changes from 1850 to 2100 in MPI ESM simulations
for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 5, 572–597, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Gong and Wang(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Gong, D. Y. and Wang, S. W.: Definition of Antarctic Oscillation Index,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 459–462, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Graham et al.(2011)Graham, Ammann, Fleitmann, Cobb, and
Luterbacher</label><mixed-citation>
Graham, N. E., Ammann, C. M., Fleitmann, D., Cobb, K. M., and Luterbacher, J.:
Support for global climate reorganization during the “Medieval Climate
Anomaly”, Clim. Dynam., 7, 1217–1245, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0914-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0914-z</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Jones et al.(2009)Jones, Fogt, Widmann, Marshall, Jones, and
Visbeck</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, J. M., Fogt, R. L., Widmann, M., Marshall, G. J., Jones, P. D., and
Visbeck, M.: Historical SAM variability. Part I: Century-Length
seasonal reconstructions, J. Climate, 22, 5319–5345, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2785.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2785.1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Jourdain et al.(2013)Jourdain, Gupta, Taschetto, Ummenhofer, Moise,
and Ashok</label><mixed-citation>
Jourdain, N. C., Gupta, A. S., Taschetto, A. S., Ummenhofer, C. C., Moise,
A. F., and Ashok, K.: The Indo-Australian monsoon and its relationship to
ENSO and IOD in reanalysis data and the CMIP3/CMIP5 simulations, Clim.
Dynam., 41, 3073–3102, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Jungclaus et al.(2010)Jungclaus, Lorenz, Timmreck, Reick, Brovkin,
Six, Segschneider, Giorgetta, Crowley, and Pongraz</label><mixed-citation>
Jungclaus, J. H., Lorenz, S. J., Timmreck, C., Reick, C. H., Brovkin, V., Six, K., Segschneider, J., Giorgetta, M. A., Crowley, T. J., Pongratz, J., Krivova, N. A., Vieira, L. E., Solanki, S. K., Klocke, D., Botzet, M., Esch, M., Gayler, V., Haak, H., Raddatz, T. J., Roeckner, E., Schnur, R., Widmann, H., Claussen, M., Stevens, B., and Marotzke, J.: Climate and carbon-cycle variability over the last millennium, Clim. Past, 6, 723–737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-6-723-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-6-723-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Lamarque et al.(2010)Lamarque, Bond, Eyring, Granier, Heil, Klimont,
Lee, Liousse, Mieville, Owen, Schultz, Shindell, Smith, Stehfest, van
Aardenne, Cooper, Kainuma, Mahowald, McConnell, Naik, Riahi, and van
Vuuren</label><mixed-citation>
Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z., Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D., Smith, S. J., Stehfest, E., Van Aardenne, J., Cooper, O. R., Kainuma, M., Mahowald, N., McConnell, J. R., Naik, V., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.: Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7017–7039, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Landrum et al.(2013)Landrum, Otto-Bliesner, Wahl, Conley, Lawrence,
Rosenbloom, and Teng</label><mixed-citation>
Landrum, L., Otto-Bliesner, B., Wahl, E., Conley, A., Lawrence, P., Rosenbloom,
N., and Teng, H.: Last Millennium Climate and its Variability in
CCSM4, J. Climate, 1, 1085–1111, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Li and Wang(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J. and Wang, J.: A modified zonal index and its physical sense, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 30, 1632, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017441" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017441</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Ljungqvist et al.(2016)Ljungqvist, Krusic, Sundqvist, Zorita,
Brattström, and Frank</label><mixed-citation>
Ljungqvist, F. C., Krusic, P. J., Sundqvist, H. S., Zorita, E., Brattström,
G., and Frank, D.: Northern Hemisphere hydroclimate variability over the past
twelve centuries, Nature, 532, 94–98, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Lu et al.(2007)Lu, Vecchi, and Reichler</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, J., Vecchi, G. A., and Reichler, T.: Expansion of the Hadley cell under
global warming, Geophys. Res. Lett, 34, L06805, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028443" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028443</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Luterbacher et al.(2012)Luterbacher, García-Herrera, Akcer-On,
Allan, Alvarez-Castro, Benito, Booth, Büntgen, Cagatay, Colombaroli, Davis,
Esper, Felis, Fleitmann, Frank, Gallego, Garcia-Bustamante, Glaser,
Gonzalez-Rouco, Goosse, Kiefer, Macklin, Manning, Montagna, Newman, Power,
Rath, Ribera, Riemann, Roberts, Sicre, Silenzi, Tinner, Tzedakis,
Valero-Garcés, Schrier, Vannière, Vogt, Wanner, Werner, Willett,
Williams, Xoplaki, Zerefos, and Zorita</label><mixed-citation>
Luterbacher, J., García-Herrera, R., Akcer-On, S., Allan, R., Alvarez-Castro,
M. C., Benito, G., Booth, J., Büntgen, U., Cagatay, N., Colombaroli, D.,
Davis, B., Esper, J., Felis, T., Fleitmann, D., Frank, D., Gallego, D.,
Garcia-Bustamante, E., Glaser, R., Gonzalez-Rouco, F., Goosse, H., Kiefer,
T., Macklin, M. G., Manning, S. W., Montagna, P., Newman, L., Power, M. J.,
Rath, V., Ribera, P., Riemann, D., Roberts, N., Sicre, M. A., Silenzi, S.,
Tinner, W., Tzedakis, P. C., Valero-Garcés, B., Schrier, G., Vannière,
B., Vogt, S., Wanner, H., Werner, J. P., Willett, G., Williams, M. H.,
Xoplaki, E., Zerefos, C. S., and Zorita, E.: A review of 2000 years of
paleoclimatic evidence in the Mediterranean. In: The Climate of the
Mediterranean Region: From the Past to the Future, Elsevier, 1, 87–185,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>MacFarling-Meure et al.(2006)MacFarling-Meure, Etheridge, Trudinger,
Steele, Langenfelds, van Ommen, Smith, and Elkins</label><mixed-citation>
MacFarling-Meure, C., Etheridge, D., Trudinger, C., Steele, P., Langenfelds,
R., van Ommen, T., Smith, A., and Elkins, J.: Law Dome CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>
and N<sub>2</sub>O ice core records extended to 2000 years BP, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 33, L14810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026152" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026152</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Mankin et al.(2019)Mankin, Seager, Smerdon, Cook, and
Williams</label><mixed-citation>
Mankin, J. S., Seager, R., Smerdon, J. E., Cook, B. I., and Williams, A. P.:
Mid-latitude freshwater availability reduced by projected vegetation
responses to climate change, Nat. Geosci., 12, 983–988, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Mann et al.(2009)Mann, Zhang, Rutherford, Bradley, Hughes, Shindell,
Ammann, Faluvegi, and Ni</label><mixed-citation>
Mann, M. E., Zhang, Z., Rutherford, S., Bradley, R. S., Hughes, M. K.,
Shindell, D., Ammann, C., Faluvegi, G., and Ni, F.: Global signatures and
dynamical origins of the Little Ice Age and Medieval Climate
Anomaly, Science, 326, 1256–1260, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Masson-Delmotte et al.(2013)Masson-Delmotte, Schulz, Abe-Ouchi, Beer,
Ganopolski, Rouco, Jansen, Lambeck, Luterbacher, Naish, Osborn,
Otto-Bliesner, Quinn, Ramesh, Rojas, Shao, and
Timmermann</label><mixed-citation>
Masson-Delmotte, V., Schulz, M., Abe-Ouchi, A., Beer, J., Ganopolski, A.,
Rouco, J. F. G., Jansen, E., Lambeck, K., Luterbacher, J., Naish, T., Osborn,
T., Otto-Bliesner, B., Quinn, T., Ramesh, R., Rojas, M., Shao, X., and
Timmermann, A.: Information from Paleoclimate Archives, in: Climate
Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group
I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>May(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
May, W.: The sensitivity of the Indian summer monsoon to a global warming of
2ºC with respect to pre-industrial times, Clim. Dynam., 37, 1843–1868,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Miller et al.(2012)Miller, Geirsdóttir, Zhong, Larsen,
Otto-Bliesner, Holland, Bailey, Refsnider, Lehman, Southon, Anderson,
Björnsson, and Thordarson</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, G. H., Geirsdóttir, A., Zhong, Y., Larsen, D. J., Otto-Bliesner,
B. L., Holland, M. M. ., Bailey, D. A., Refsnider, K. A., Lehman, S. J.,
Southon, J. R., Anderson, C., Björnsson, H., and Thordarson, T.: Abrupt
onset of the Little Ice Age triggered by volcanism and sustained by
sea-ice/ocean feedbacks, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L02708, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050168" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050168</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Neukom et al.(2014)Neukom, Gergis, Karoly, Wanner, Curran, Elbert,
González-Rouco, Linsley, Moy, Mundo, Raible, Steig, van Ommen, Vance,
Villalba, Zinke, and Frank</label><mixed-citation>
Neukom, R., Gergis, J., Karoly, D. J., Wanner, H., Curran, M., Elbert, J.,
González-Rouco, F., Linsley, B. K., Moy, A. D., Mundo, I., Raible, C. C.,
Steig, E. J., van Ommen, T., Vance, T., Villalba, R., Zinke, J., and Frank,
D.: Inter-hemispheric temperature variability over the past millennium,
Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 362–367, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Neukom et al.(2019)Neukom, Steiger, Gómez-Navarro, Wang, and
Werner</label><mixed-citation>
Neukom, R., Steiger, N., Gómez-Navarro, J. J., Wang, J., and Werner, J. P.:
No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the
preindustrial Common Era, Nature, 571, 550–554, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Newton et al.(2006)Newton, Thunell, and Stott</label><mixed-citation>
Newton, A., Thunell, R., and Stott, L.: Climate and hydrographic variability in
the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool during the last millennium, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 33, L19710, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027234" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027234</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Ortega et al.(2013)Ortega, Montoya, González-Rouco, Beltrami, and
Swingedouw</label><mixed-citation>
Ortega, P., Montoya, M., González-Rouco, F., Beltrami, H., and Swingedouw, D.: Variability of the ocean heat content during the last millennium – an assessment with the ECHO-g Model, Clim. Past, 9, 547–565, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-547-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-547-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Otto-Bliesner et al.(2015)Otto-Bliesner, Brady, Fasullo, Jahn,
Landrum, Stevenson, Rosenbloom, Mai, and Strand</label><mixed-citation>
Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Brady, E. C., Fasullo, J., Jahn, A., Landrum, L.,
Stevenson, S., Rosenbloom, N., Mai, A., and Strand, G.: Climate variability
and change since 850 C.E.: An ensemble approach with the Community
Earth System Model (CESM), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 735–754, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00233.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00233.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>PAGES2k-PMIP3 group(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
PAGES 2k-PMIP3 group: Continental-scale temperature variability in PMIP3 simulations and PAGES 2k regional temperature reconstructions over the past millennium, Clim. Past, 11, 1673–1699, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-1673-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-1673-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Palmer(1965)</label><mixed-citation>
Palmer, W.: Meteorologic drought, U.S. Weather Bureau, Res. Pap. No. 45, 58,
1965.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Phipps et al.(2012)Phipps, Rotstayn, Gordon, Roberts, Hirst, and
Budd</label><mixed-citation>
Phipps, S. J., Rotstayn, L. D., Gordon, H. B., Roberts, J. L., Hirst, A. C., and Budd, W. F.: The CSIRO Mk3L climate system model version 1.0 – Part 2: Response to external forcings, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 649–682, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-649-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-649-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Pongratz et al.(2008)Pongratz, Reick, Raddatz, and
Claussen</label><mixed-citation>
Pongratz, J., Reick, C. H., Raddatz, T., and Claussen, M.: A reconstruction of
global agricultural areas and land cover for the last millennium, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB3018, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003153" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003153</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Sachs et al.(2009)Sachs, Sachse, Smittenberg, Zhang, Battisti, and
Golubic</label><mixed-citation>
Sachs, J. P., Sachse, D., Smittenberg, R. H., Zhang, Z. H., Battisti, D. S.,
and Golubic, S.: Southward movement of the Pacific intertropical
convergence zone AD 1400–1850, Nat. Geosci., 2, 519–525, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Schmidt et al.(2006)Schmidt, Ruedy, Hansen, Aleinov, Bell, Bauer,
Bauer, Cairns, Canuto, Cheng, Genio, Faluvegi, Friend, Hall, Hu, Kelley,
Kiang, Koch, Lacis, Lerner, Lo, Miller, Nazarenko, Oinas, Perlwitz, Perlwitz,
Rind, Romanou, Russell, Sato, Shindell, Stone, Sun, Tausnev, Thresher, , and
Yao</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, G., Ruedy, R., Hansen, J., Aleinov, I., Bell, N., Bauer, M., Bauer,
S., Cairns, B., Canuto, V., Cheng, Y., Genio, A. D., Faluvegi, G., Friend,
A., Hall, T., Hu, Y., Kelley, M., Kiang, N., Koch, D., Lacis, A., Lerner, J.,
Lo, K., Miller, R., Nazarenko, L., Oinas, V., Perlwitz, J., Perlwitz, J.,
Rind, D., Romanou, A., Russell, G., Sato, M., Shindell, D., Stone, P., Sun,
S., Tausnev, N., Thresher, D.,  and Yao, M.: Present day atmospheric
simulations using GISS ModelE: Comparison to in-situ, satellite and
reanalysis data, J. Climate, 19, 153–192, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Schmidt et al.(2014)Schmidt, Kelley, Nazarenko, Ruedy, Russell,
Aleinov, Bauer, Bauer, Bhat, Bleck, Canuto, Chen, Cheng, Clune, Genio,
de Fainchtein, Faluvegi, Hansen, Healy, Kiang, Koch, Lacis, LeGrande, Lerner,
Lo, Matthews, Menon, Miller, Oinas, Oloso, Perlwitz, Puma, Putman, Rind,
Romanou, Sato, Shindell, Sun, Syed, Tausnev, Tsigaridis, Unger, Voulgarakis,
Yao, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, G., Kelley, M., Nazarenko, L., Ruedy, R., Russell, G., Aleinov, I.,
Bauer, M., Bauer, S., Bhat, M., Bleck, R., Canuto, V., Chen, Y., Cheng, Y.,
Clune, T., Genio, A. D., de Fainchtein, R., Faluvegi, G., Hansen, J., Healy,
R., Kiang, N., Koch, D., Lacis, A., LeGrande, A., Lerner, J., Lo, K.,
Matthews, E., Menon, S., Miller, R., Oinas, V., Oloso, A., Perlwitz, J.,
Puma, M., Putman, W., Rind, D., Romanou, A., Sato, M., Shindell, D., Sun, S.,
Syed, R., Tausnev, N., Tsigaridis, K., Unger, N., Voulgarakis, A., Yao, M.,
and Zhang, J.: Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2
contributions to the CMIP5 archive, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 6,
141–184, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Schmidt et al.(2011)Schmidt, Jungclaus, Ammann, Bard, Braconnot,
Crowley, Delaygue, Joos, Krivova, Muscheler, Otto-Bliesner, Pongratz,
Shindell, Solanki, Steinhilber, and Vieira</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, G. A., Jungclaus, J. H., Ammann, C. M., Bard, E., Braconnot, P., Crowley, T. J., Delaygue, G., Joos, F., Krivova, N. A., Muscheler, R., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Pongratz, J., Shindell, D. T., Solanki, S. K., Steinhilber, F., and Vieira, L. E. A.: Climate forcing reconstructions for use in PMIP simulations of the last millennium (v1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 33–45, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-33-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-33-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Schmidt et al.(2012)Schmidt, Jungclaus, Ammann, Bard, Braconnot,
Crowley, Delaygue, Joos, Krivova, Muscheler, Otto-Bliesner, Pongratz,
Shindell, Solanki, Steinhilber, and Vieira</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, G. A., Jungclaus, J. H., Ammann, C. M., Bard, E., Braconnot, P., Crowley, T. J., Delaygue, G., Joos, F., Krivova, N. A., Muscheler, R., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Pongratz, J., Shindell, D. T., Solanki, S. K., Steinhilber, F., and Vieira, L. E. A.: Climate forcing reconstructions for use in PMIP simulations of the Last Millennium (v1.1), Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 185–191, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-185-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-185-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Schurer et al.(2013)Schurer, Hegerl, Mann, Tett, and
Phipps</label><mixed-citation>
Schurer, A. P., Hegerl, G. C., Mann, M. E., Tett, S. F. B., and Phipps, S. J.:
Separating forced from chaotic climate variability over the past millennium,
J. Climate, 26, 6954–6973, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Seager et al.(2007)Seager, Ting, Held, Kushnir, Lu, Vecchi, Huang,
Harnik, Leetmaa, Lau, Li, Velez, and Naik</label><mixed-citation>
Seager, R., Ting, M., Held, I., Kushnir, Y., Lu, J., Vecchi, G., Huang, H.,
Harnik, N., Leetmaa, A., Lau, N., Li, C., Velez, J., and Naik, N.: Model
projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in
Southwestern North America, Science, 316, 1181–1184, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Smerdon et al.(2015)Smerdon, Cook, Cook, and
Seager</label><mixed-citation>
Smerdon, J. E., Cook, B. I., Cook, E. R., and Seager, R.: Bridging Past and
Future Climate across Paleoclimatic Reconstructions, Observations, and
Models: A Hydroclimate Case Study, J. Climate, 28, 3212–3231, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Steinhilber et al.(2009)Steinhilber, Beer, and
Fröhlich</label><mixed-citation>
Steinhilber, F., Beer, J., and Fröhlich, C.: Total solar irradiance during
the Holocene, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L19704, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040142" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040142</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Steinman et al.(2013)Steinman, Abbott, Mann, Stansell, and
Finney</label><mixed-citation>
Steinman, B. A., Abbott, M. B., Mann, M. E., Stansell, N. D., and Finney,
B. P.: 1,500 year quantitative reconstruction of winter precipitation in the
Pacific Northwest, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 11619–11623, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Stephenson et al.(2006)Stephenson, Pavan, Collins, Junge, and
Quadrelli</label><mixed-citation>
Stephenson, D., Pavan, V., Collins, M., Junge, M., and Quadrelli, R.: North
Atlantic Oscillation response to transient greenhouse gas forcing and the
impact on European winter climate: A CMIP2 multi-model assessment,
Clim. Dynam., 27, 401–420, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Stocker et al.(2013)Stocker, Qin, Plattner, Alexander, Allen,
Bindoff, Bréon, Church, Cubasch, Emori, Forster, Friedlingstein, Gillett,
Gregory, Hartmann, Jansen, Kirtman, Knutti, Kumar, Lemke, Marotzke,
Masson-Delmotte, Meehl, Mokhov, Piao, Ramaswamy, Randall, Rhein, Rojas,
Sabine, Shindell, Talley, Vaughan, and Xie</label><mixed-citation>
Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G. K., Alexander, L. V., Allen, S. K.,
Bindoff, N. L., Bréon, F. M., Church, J. A., Cubasch, U., Emori, S.,
Forster, P., Friedlingstein, P., Gillett, N., Gregory, J. M., Hartmann,
D. L., Jansen, E., Kirtman, B., Knutti, R., Kumar, K. K., Lemke, P.,
Marotzke, J., Masson-Delmotte, V., Meehl, G. A., Mokhov, I. I., Piao, S.,
Ramaswamy, V., Randall, D., Rhein, M., Rojas, M., Sabine, C., Shindell, D.,
Talley, L. D., Vaughan, D. G., and Xie, S. P.: Technical Summary, in:
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University
Press, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Tardif et al.(2019)Tardif, Hakim, Perkins, Horlick, Erb, Emile-Geay,
Anderson, Steig, and Noone</label><mixed-citation>
Tardif, R., Hakim, G. J., Perkins, W. A., Horlick, K. A., Erb, M. P., Emile-Geay, J., Anderson, D. M., Steig, E. J., and Noone, D.: Last Millennium Reanalysis with an expanded proxy database and seasonal proxy modeling, Clim. Past, 15, 1251–1273, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1251-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1251-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Taylor et al.(2007)Taylor, Parker, and Harris</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, C. M., Parker, D. J., and Harris, P. P.: An observational case study of
mesoscale atmospheric circulations induced by soil moisture, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L15801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030572" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030572</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Tett et al.(2007)Tett, Betts, Crowley, Timothy, Johns, Jones, Osborn,
Öström, Roberts, and Woodage</label><mixed-citation>
Tett, S., Betts, R., Crowley, T., Timothy, J., Johns, C., Jones, A., Osborn,
T., Öström, E., Roberts, D., and Woodage, M.: The impact of natural and
anthropogenic forcings on climate and hydrology since 1550, Clim. Dynam., 28,
3–34, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Thompson and Wallace(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Thompson, D. W. J. and Wallace, J. M.: Regional Climate Impacts of the
Northern Hemisphere Annular Mode, Science, 293, 85–89, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Thornthwaite(1948)</label><mixed-citation>
Thornthwaite, C. W.: An approach toward a rational classification of climate,
Geogr. Rev., 38, 55–94, 1948.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Trouet et al.(2009)Trouet, Esper, Graham, Baker, Scourse, and
Frank</label><mixed-citation>
Trouet, V., Esper, J., Graham, N. E., Baker, A., Scourse, J. D., and Frank,
D. C.: Persistent Positive North Atlantic Oscillation Mode Dominated
the Medieval Climate Anomaly, Science, 324, 78–80, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1166349" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1166349</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Vial et al.(2013)Vial, Dufresne, and Bony</label><mixed-citation>
Vial, J., Dufresne, J. L., and Bony, S.: On the interpretation of inter-model
spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates, Clim. Dynam., 41, 3339–3362,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Vieira et al.(2011)Vieira, Solanki, Krivova, and
Usoskin</label><mixed-citation>
Vieira, L. E. A., Solanki, S. K., Krivova, N. A., and Usoskin, I.: Evolution of
the solar irradiance during the Holocene, Astron. Astrophys., 531, A6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015843" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015843</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Vuille et al.(2012)Vuille, Burns, Taylor, Cruz, Bird, Abbott, Kanner,
Cheng, and Novello</label><mixed-citation>
Vuille, M., Burns, S. J., Taylor, B. L., Cruz, F. W., Bird, B. W., Abbott, M. B., Kanner, L. C., Cheng, H., and Novello, V. F.: A review of the South American monsoon history as recorded in stable isotopic proxies over the past two millennia, Clim. Past, 8, 1309–1321, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-1309-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-1309-2012</a>, 2012.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Wang et al.(2005)Wang, Cheng, Edwards, He, Kong, An, Wu, Kelly,
Dykoski, and Li</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., He, Y., Kong, X., An, Z., Wu, J., Kelly,
M. J., Dykoski, C. A., and Li, X.: The Holocene Asian monsoon: links to
solar changes and North Atlantic climate, Science, 308, 854–857, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106296" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106296</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Wells et al.(2004)Wells, Goddard, and Hayes</label><mixed-citation>
Wells, N., Goddard, S., and Hayes, M. J.: A self-calibrating Palmer Drought
Severity Index, J. Climate, 17, 2335–2351, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Widlansky et al.(2011)Widlansky, Webster, and
Hoyos</label><mixed-citation>
Widlansky, M. J., Webster, P. J., and Hoyos, C. D.: On the location and
orientation of the South Pacific Convergence Zone, Clim. Dynam., 36,
561–578, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Wilson et al.(2016)Wilson, Anchukaitis, Briffa, Büntgen, Cook,
D'Arrigo, Davi, Esper, Frank, Gunnarson, Hegerl, Helama, Klesse, Krusic,
Linderholm, Myglano, Osborn, Rydval, and Zorita</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, R., Anchukaitis, K., Briffa, K. R., Büntgen, U., Cook, E., D'Arrigo,
R., Davi, N., Esper, J., Frank, D., Gunnarson, B., Hegerl, G., Helama, S.,
Klesse, S., Krusic, P. J., Linderholm, H. W., Myglano, V., Osborn, T. J.,
Rydval, M., and Zorita, E.: Last millennium northern hemisphere summer
temperatures from tree rings: Part I: The long term context, Quaternary Sci.
Rev., 134, 1–18, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Xie et al.(2007)Xie, Miyama, Wang, Xu, de Szoeke, Small, Richards,
Mochizuki, and Awaji</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, P., Miyama, T., Wang, Y., Xu, H., de Szoeke, S. P., Small, R. J. O.,
Richards, K. J., Mochizuki, T., and Awaji, T.: A regional ocean-atmosphere
model for eastern Pacific climate, J. Climate, 20, 1504–1522,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Yukimoto et al.(2011)Yukimoto, Yoshimura, Hosaka, Sakami, Tsujino,
Hirabara, Tanaka, Deushi, Obata, Nakano, Adachi, Shindo, Yabu, Ose, and
Kitoh</label><mixed-citation>
Yukimoto, S., Yoshimura, H., Hosaka, M., Sakami, T., Tsujino, H., Hirabara, M.,
Tanaka, T. Y., Deushi, M., Obata, A., Nakano, H., Adachi, Y., Shindo, E.,
Yabu, S., Ose, T., and Kitoh, A.: Meteorological Research Institute –
Earth System Model Version 1 (MRI-ESM1) – Model Description,
Tech. Rep. of the Met. Res. Inst., 64, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Zorita et al.(2005)Zorita, González-Rouco, von Storch, Montávez,
and Valero</label><mixed-citation>
Zorita, E., González-Rouco, J. F., von Storch, H., Montávez, J. P., and
Valero, F.: Natural and anthropogenic modes of surface temperature variations
in the last thousand years, Geophys. Res. Lett, 32, L08707, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021563" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021563</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
