<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">CP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Climate of the Past</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">CP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Clim. Past</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1814-9332</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/cp-14-1441-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>The role of regional feedbacks in glacial inception on Baffin Island: the interaction of ice flow and meteorology</article-title><alt-title>Glacial inception: ice flow and meteorology</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Glacial inception: ice flow and meteorology}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{L.~Birch et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Birch</surname><given-names>Leah</given-names></name>
          <email>lbirch@seas.harvard.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Cronin</surname><given-names>Timothy</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tziperman</surname><given-names>Eli</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and Department of Earth
and Planetary Sciences,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences, MIT,
Cambridge, MA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Leah Birch (lbirch@seas.harvard.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>18</day><month>October</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>10</issue>
      <fpage>1441</fpage><lpage>1462</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>7</day><month>February</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018.html">This article is available from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e106">Over the past 0.8 million years, 100 kyr ice ages have dominated
Earth's climate with geological evidence suggesting the last glacial
inception began in the mountains of Baffin Island. Currently,
state-of-the-art global climate models (GCMs) have difficulty simulating
glacial inception, possibly due in part to their coarse horizontal resolution
and the neglect of ice flow dynamics in some models. We attempt to address
the role of regional feedbacks in the initial inception problem on Baffin
Island by asynchronously coupling the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model,
configured as a high-resolution inner domain over Baffin and an outer
domain incorporating much of North America, to an ice flow model using the
shallow ice approximation. The mass balance is calculated from WRF
simulations and used to drive the ice model, which updates the ice extent
and elevation, that then serve as inputs to the next WRF run. We drive the
regional WRF configuration using atmospheric boundary conditions from 1986
that correspond to a relatively cold summer, and with 115 kya insolation.
Initially, ice accumulates on mountain glaciers, driving downslope ice flow
which expands the size of the ice caps. However, continued iterations of the
atmosphere and ice models reveal a stagnation of the ice sheet on Baffin
Island, driven by melting due to warmer temperatures at the margins of the
ice caps. This warming is caused by changes in the regional circulation that
are forced by elevation changes due to the ice growth. A stabilizing feedback
between ice elevation and atmospheric circulation thus prevents full
inception from occurring.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e116">For the past million years, Earth's climate has repeatedly fallen into ice
ages with a periodicity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 000 years <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.1"/>. How
glacial inceptions occur is still a largely unresolved problem in climate
science <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.2"/>. The leading hypothesis
for the cause of glacial inception is that orbital variations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="paren.3"/> cause cooler summers leading to less melting,
although previous studies found that additional amplifying feedbacks beyond
the ice–albedo feedback are necessary to explain inception. Possible
amplifiers of orbital forcing may be divided into large-scale non-local
feedbacks, including ocean temperature and planetary-scale circulation
changes, and local feedbacks associated with greater height and extent of
mountain glaciers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.4"/>, regional circulation changes, clouds, and more. In this
study, we seek to understand specifically the role of local ice–climate
feedbacks in glacial inception using a regional climate model asynchronously
coupled to a simple ice sheet model. Our regional model is centered over
Baffin Island – the likely location of the last glacial inception
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx102 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.5"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1442?><p id="d1e145">Glacial inception of the Laurentide ice sheet is thought to have progressed
fairly rapidly from Baffin Island in eastern Canada <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.6"/>,
with the associated drop in sea level estimated to be as large as 50 m in
10 kyrs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.7"/>. The Laurentide
ice sheet has been identified as the primary initial cause of the drop in sea
level <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.8"/>, and some ice modeling studies have shown rapid
inception within a few thousand years <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.9"/>. However, this rapid growth required extreme precipitation
increases or excessive climate cooling every thousand years, without any
explicit explanation. A more modest sea level drop of 10–20 m in 10 kyrs has
also been posited <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.10"/>, which
indicates a slower ice sheet growth rate and possibly ice growth relegated to
Arctic Canadian islands <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.11"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e167">Global climate models (GCMs) have been used to simulate glacial inception,
focusing on large-scale feedbacks. They often find that snow does not
accumulate in unglaciated areas or that glaciers do not spread into
unglaciated areas. One reason GCMs have difficulty simulating the glacial
inception is their coarse horizontal resolution, which lowers the topographic
features dramatically <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98 bib1.bibx94" id="paren.12"/>. Snow
then does not accumulate because the region is too warm due to artificially
low elevations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="paren.13"/>. Though topography is important
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.14"/>, other aspects
of the climate system may also be misrepresented in GCMs, like ocean
feedbacks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.15"/>, dust
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.16"/>, sea ice <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx66" id="paren.17"/>, vegetation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.18"/>, and
meteorology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.19"/>.
Increasing the model resolution has led to moderate improvements in the
simulation of glacial inception <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx93 bib1.bibx80" id="paren.20"/>, through the occurrence of areas of net
snow accumulation, which can progressively expand as the climate cools. Given
that GCMs had such difficulties in simulating glacial inception, our study
focuses on the importance of regional feedbacks over Baffin Island.</p>
      <p id="d1e198">While Milankovitch forcing explains some summer cooling, the large-scale
circulation is an important driver of heat and moisture fluxes to inception
areas. In the current climatology, large-scale cyclonic circulation over
Baffin Bay is associated with cool summers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.21"/>, which may be all that is necessary for inception.
However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="normal.22"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="normal.23"/> also noted
increased storms and poleward moisture fluxes during inception.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="normal.24"/> showed that, in addition to favorable
circulation and temperature, snow could accumulate in new areas only after
artificial large-scale cooling was prescribed. The following question remains: how does
this cooling occur? One possible answer is the interaction of ice sheets and
the atmosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e214">As the ice sheet grows, it influences the atmosphere due to albedo and
surface elevation changes. The regional circulation can also be diverted by
the changing topography. Anticyclones have been noted to occur over
mountains <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.25"/>, but ultimately the effects of
mountains on the regional climate and large-scale circulation depend on the
mean overlying flow and mountain size
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.26"/>. Looking at large-scale ice
growth in the context of glacial inception, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="normal.27"/> argued using a
simple model that slight changes in topography can influence the stationary
waves, significantly changing the circulation and leading to colder
temperatures. The topography and geographic location may be critical to the
glacial inception process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.28"/>,
but previous studies did not consider the effect of ice-growth-induced
regional topography changes on Baffin Island.</p>
      <p id="d1e229">To capture the interaction of ice and the atmosphere, climate models of
intermediate complexity have been combined with ice sheet models. This type
of coupled ice–climate model allows thousands of years of ice growth due to
changes in insolation and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be simulated. Often, however, these
models glaciate Alaska and western Canada very rapidly
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.29"/>, which is not consistent with the geological record
showing inception occurred first over Baffin Island in eastern Canada
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.30"/>. Ice sheet models and GCM studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx74" id="paren.31"/> have a similar problem of not agreeing
with the geological record. Combining GCMs and ice sheet modeling may allow
for progress in understanding ice–atmosphere interactions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.32"/>, but the smoothed topography and other biases in
these coarse-resolution climate models often need to be artificially
corrected to obtain an accurate regional climate. Furthermore, mountain ice
caps of the Canadian Arctic archipelago in the present climate are too small
to be modeled by large-scale ice models – hence our use of a higher-resolution
regional ice model.</p>
      <p id="d1e255">The interaction of ice and atmosphere is a critical component of
glacial inception, often left out of climate models. For instance,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="normal.33"/> focused on a single ice cap on Baffin Island using a
high-resolution cloud-permitting regional climate model without an ice flow
model. That study found that ice would accumulate on the mountain glaciers of
Baffin Island. The 4 km resolution of that study captured both the ablation
and accumulation zones of mountain glaciers. By integrating the mass balance
from the top of the ice cap downslope, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="normal.34"/> implicitly
represented the effects of ice flow. As a result, the Penny Ice Cap was
deduced to grow outside of its present-day bounds due to decreased insolation
and a sequence of cold summers and wet winters. Consistent with previous GCM
studies, no snow accumulated in unglaciated areas.</p>
      <p id="d1e264">Thus, the purpose of the current paper is to study the role of regional
feedbacks in the inception over the major ice caps of Baffin Island,
including the role of ice flow. By prescribing boundary conditions from the
modern climate, we do not consider any role of non-local ice sheet growth in
modifying the planetary wave pattern, which could aid or hinder inception on
Baffin Island. This is consistent both with other studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.35"/> and with our
intention to study the effect of regional feedbacks.<?pagebreak page1443?> Similarly, we neglect
the role of sea surface temperature (SST) changes, as there is debate over warm
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91 bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.36"/>
or cold oceans during inception <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.37"/>.
We choose to keep modern SSTs and identify whether inception may be described
as a local process over Baffin Island, driven by Milankovitch forcing.
Regional ice–albedo and height–mass balance feedbacks are expected to
dominate at least some of the planetary-scale feedbacks at the very beginning
of the inception process. We drive the model with boundary conditions
corresponding to wet and cool summers from reanalysis, ideal for inception
but not extremely uncommon during present-day climate. Such conditions may be
the result of SST forcing that is not explicitly simulated, so in that sense
we do include some SST effects. Our regional model configuration could also
be driven by the boundary conditions from a GCM simulation of glacial
inception, which would incorporate some planetary-scale feedbacks. However,
given the inability of such models to simulate the inception and often the
lack of substantial circulation changes over Baffin Island
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.38"/>, we choose not to take that route and focus
solely on regional feedbacks.</p>
      <p id="d1e279">We investigate the feedbacks between a growing ice sheet and the atmosphere
at higher spatial resolution than can be simulated with GCMs, using an
shallow ice approximation ice flow model asynchronously coupled with the
Weather Research and Forecasting model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="normal.39"><named-content content-type="pre">WRF;</named-content></xref>. We find
that the change to ice sheet topography induces an anticyclonic atmospheric
response over Baffin Island. This anticyclone causes a flow of warm air over
the Baffin Island and Hudson Bay area, increasing ablation, stagnating further
ice sheet growth, and thus indicating a negative feedback on inception at the
regional scale.</p>
      <p id="d1e287">The atmospheric and ice models used for the asynchronous coupling experiment
are presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>. We present the results in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>, beginning with the mass balances and resulting ice
thickness of our atmosphere–ice iterations. We then investigate the regional
climate and local circulation impacts of expanding ice cover and increasing
ice elevation. Sensitivity simulations exploring the importance of topography
and insolation are also presented. Finally, the sensitivity of ice flow to
ice viscosity and mass balance are examined. We conclude with a discussion in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>, including the limitations of this study and its
implications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d1e302">Our goal in this study is to better understand the interaction between
changing ice cover and the regional climate of Baffin Island and the feedback
on the regional circulation over Canada. We therefore use a nested
configuration of the WRF model
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="paren.40"/> with the outer domain covering all of North
America with a 100 km resolution and the inner domain covering Baffin Island
with a 20 km resolution, encompassing both the Penny and Barnes ice caps. To
better understand the growth of these mountain glaciers during inception, we
must simulate ice flow in the inner 20 km resolution domain, but WRF does
not contain an ice flow model, which means the ice expansion must be
calculated offline. Based off of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="normal.41"/>, we developed a
simple ice flow model that reduces the 3-D Stokes flow to two dimensions
using the shallow ice approximation. The basal sliding velocity is assumed to
be 0. This approximation results in a non-linear diffusion equation that
represents ice flow by evolving ice thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in time based on horizontal
gradients of surface elevation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, along with surface mass balance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M6" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e375">In Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), the yearly surface mass balance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated from
WRF simulations and assumes that the density of ice is 900 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
surface elevation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ice thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are linked by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the basal topography. The non-linear shear thinning of ice flow is
represented by a diffusivity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which depends on both the ice thickness
and surface elevation gradients:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M14" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e532">The parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for all model simulations is set to 3, which is a typical
value for realistic ice simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.42"/>. The
coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) is the creep parameter that influences
the viscosity of the ice based on the temperature of the ice; i.e., the
colder ice flows more slowly, while warmer ice flows more quickly. We use a creep
parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Pa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="normal.43"/>. More details on this choice of creep parameter can
be found in Appendix A, which also contains the details of the numerical
scheme used to integrate this ice model in time.</p>
      <p id="d1e604">The ice model requires the specification of initial surface elevation
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), initial ice thickness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), basal topography (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) that is
time-independent, and mass balance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) as an input for each time step. The
ice thickness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is adapted from the present-day ice cover on Baffin
Island from the NASA Operation IceBridge mission <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.44"/>, while
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are taken from our WRF simulations. The grid size and time step
are also user specified and chosen to be 20 km (same as WRF inner domain)
and 1 year, respectively. With these atmospheric and ice models, we perform
iterations, running WRF, using the mass balance calculated by WRF to force
the ice model, updating the ice thickness and extent calculated by the ice
model, and then running WRF again with the newly calculated ice cover as an
input. This amounts to an asynchronous coupling of the two models,<?pagebreak page1444?> where a
WRF run followed by the ice model is considered an iteration.</p>
      <p id="d1e669">WRF <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="paren.45"/>, version 3.7, is a compressible, non-hydrostatic
model, which has been shown to provide a reasonable simulation of mountainous
and Arctic regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.46"/>.
Reanalysis data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="normal.47"><named-content content-type="pre">ECMWF;</named-content></xref> are used for setting the meteorological boundary and
initial conditions, including sea surface temperatures and sea ice extent.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="normal.48"/> also noted that the interim reanalysis
(ERA-Interim) is a suitable choice of boundary conditions for WRF in the
Arctic.</p>
      <p id="d1e686">We use the WRF single-moment six-class microphysics scheme, which allows for
ice, snow, and graupel processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.49"/>. The community Noah land
surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.50"/>
is used for the land surface model. It includes four layers of snow and allows
for refreezing, which is an important process on the Penny Ice Cap according
to historical trends <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106" id="paren.51"/>. Noah-MP caps the snow water
content at 2000 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by default, but we remove this limit. The
radiation scheme is the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model for GCM applications
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="normal.52"><named-content content-type="pre">RRTMG;</named-content></xref>, which has been found to have minimal
bias in WRF <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.53"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is set to 290 ppm
for a glacial inception scenario <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx95" id="paren.54"/>. The
boundary layer is simulated with the Mellor–Yamada–Janjic scheme
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="normal.55"><named-content content-type="pre">MYJ;</named-content></xref>. Lateral boundary conditions are prescribed at
the edges of the outer domain, yet no nudging to observations is used in the
domain interior, as we want to allow the atmosphere to respond to land
surface changes. Such spectral nudging is often used in regional models to
eliminate artificial circulation patterns that develop in spite of the
prescribed boundary conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.56"/>. Comparing a
present-day
control run to ECMWF, we find (Fig. S1 in the Supplement) non-negligible deviations
in geopotential height. Yet we show below that the anomalous circulation that
develops in response to ice growth in our simulations is likely unrelated to
these anomalies, as they develop gradually in response to the growing ice
height. Note that these physics are the same as those used in our previous
paper <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.57"/>, except now we use the Grell convective scheme
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.58"/>, which has been shown to give good results in
the present day <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.59"/> and the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.60"/>
Arctic climates.</p>
      <p id="d1e754">We use realistic present-day land types from the WRF database as initial
conditions for the ice extent on Baffin Island. Over these land grid points
classified as ice, a snow water equivalent (SWE) of 5000 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is
prescribed – sufficient for maintaining snow cover for the duration of our
runs and allowing us to capture a representative yearly mass balance for the
chosen climatology. Greenland is initialized with present-day ice cover and
elevation based on studies finding little influence of Greenland on the build
up of the Laurentide ice sheet <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.61"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e772">We first run a present-day meteorology simulation forced by ECMWF boundary
conditions, representative of average and cold atmospheric conditions, also
simulated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="normal.62"/>. With the above WRF configuration, we
find a reasonable reproduction of the Arctic atmospheric state when we look
at the full fields (Fig. S1). While there are deviations in
geopotential and temperature between WRF and ECMWF, the differences in
geopotential have been seen in other Arctic studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.63"/>.
The temperature bias occurs from differences in the snow cover between the
models. For instance, ECMWF has been noted to have too large of a
snow-covered area on coasts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.64"/>, promoting cooling on
Baffin Island which is mostly coast at the reanalysis resolution. Also, June
is the cause of the large temperature bias because ECMWF still has snow on
the ground, associated with delayed snowmelt <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.65"/>,
while the snow in WRF melts earlier. July and August only differ in
temperature by about 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, when the snow
cover in ECMWF and WRF are more similar. With the warm temperature bias, WRF
will likely not cause an artificial inception, which making it more suitable
than models with a cold bias. Furthermore, ECMWF is known to have a cold bias
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx88" id="paren.66"/> and a significant low
geopotential height in the central Arctic of the same magnitude as the
deviation we see in Fig. S1. Therefore, with WRF having the opposite biases,
the Arctic climate simulated is not abnormal. Our WRF simulation matches
observations of precipitation on the coast of Baffin Island, important for
the surface mass balance, of about 300 mm per year
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106" id="paren.67"/>. In any case, the warm bias in our WRF control
run does not prevent the circulation from bringing relatively cold and wet
conditions to Baffin Island <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.68"/>. Previous works also
proceeded to look at climate sensitivity by comparing model experiments in
spite of biases in the control run <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.69"/>, as we do here, and
we therefore do not believe the biases would have a significant impact on the
sensitivity results here.</p>
      <p id="d1e809">For our main set of glacial inception simulations, the incoming solar
radiation is set to values consistent with 115 kya; the process of modifying
the insolation in WRF based on the orbital parameters is detailed in the
Appendix of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="normal.70"/>. The conditions most conducive to snow
accumulation are from October 1985 to October 1986. These cold meteorology
boundary conditions caused the present-day ice cover to expand when combined
with 115 kya insolation in the study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="normal.71"/>.
Figure S3 in the Supplement  shows cumulative mass balance for present-day average
conditions, present-day cold meteorology conditions, and cold meteorology
plus 115 kya orbital forcing. The combination of moderately cool
temperatures and reduced summer insolation leads to net snow accumulation,
hinting that inception might be viable given sufficiently positive<?pagebreak page1445?> regional
feedbacks. A longer averaging of the forcing, as obtained from a climate
model, would have some advantages. However, given the persistent difficulties
in simulating glacial inception using such GCMs, our goal here is to minimize
the introduction of biases from global climate simulations. We therefore
prefer to choose the necessary cold and wet meteorology from the observed
modern climate (reanalysis). We cannot explain how these ideal circulation
patterns occur during inception, but a future study with a GCM might
carefully explore this. We do note that forcing with a single-year
meteorology may bias the ice growth patterns if that year is not
representative of longer-term cold conditions.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Asynchronous coupling procedure</title>
      <p id="d1e823">We begin our WRF–ice flow coupled model experiment with a WRF simulation that
uses meteorology from October 1985 to October 1986 (Iteration 1). WRF is run
for 5 years, but we only analyze the last 4 years for an average climatology.
Accumulation occurs over areas initialized with ice cover at high elevations,
and net mass balance is positive, allowing ice growth
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a). The Iteration 1 simulation agrees with
our previous 4 km simulation of the Penny Ice Cap <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.72"/>:
Milankovitch forcing and cold meteorology cause the positive mass balance
needed for the ice cap to expand. This mass balance is then adapted for use
in the ice model.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e833">Ice thickness and
mass balance for ice sheet initialization: <bold>(a)</bold> ice thickness was
adapted from data collected by the NASA Operation IceBridge mission
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.73"/> with extent set by land use type in WRF.
<bold>(b)</bold> Annual mass balance from the WRF Iteration 1 run.
<bold>(c)</bold> Scatter plot of mass balances vs. elevation with a binned
regression visualization </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e854">For the first iteration of the ice model, initial ice thickness is adapted
from present-day ice cover from the NASA Operation IceBridge Mission
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a). We use the surface elevation from the
20 km resolution Iteration 1 WRF domain. The mass balance needed to force
the ice model is calculated from the WRF simulation.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b depicts the mass balance results from the
Iteration 1 WRF simulation with cold meteorology, 115 kya insolation, and
present-day ice cover. The mass balance over the ice caps is generally
positive, except on the edges of the ice cap where there is net ablation.
Over the rest of the domain, WRF cannot calculate a meaningful annual mass
balance because all snowfall received melts off during the summer. Thus, to
have a mass balance in ice-free grid cells, we characterize the mass balance
as a function of elevation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This characterization involves sorting
the domain by surface elevation and forming bins every 100 m, and allowing
the mass balance during the ice model run to be updated at each grid point as
the surface elevation and ice thickness change every time step. The average
the mass balance in each bin is depicted by the purple crosses in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c. Note the plateau in the mass balance at
high elevations, which is expected from the elevation desert effect.</p>
      <p id="d1e880">For our asynchronous coupling experiment, the ice model is run for 500 years,
as any longer has been shown to inhibit ice growth artificially
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.74"/>. We find 500 years sufficient to grow ice
while maintaining computationally efficiency. After 500 years, the ice model
has calculated a new ice extent and surface elevation
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a) with which to force WRF. We import the
surface elevation directly into the 20 km resolution WRF domain and use the
ice extent to update the land type, i.e., the expansion of the ice cap. Much
like our Iteration 1 simulation, over areas classified as ice, we prescribe a
snow depth of 5000 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The surface elevation and land type of the
100 km resolution parent domain are adjusted through interpolation of the
20 km resolution surface elevation and land type. Soil temperatures from the
previous WRF run are used to initialize the next WRF iteration. In our
simulations, soil temperatures take a year to equilibrate, leading us to
agree with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="normal.75"/> that present-day soil temperatures are too
warm. Again using 115 kya insolation and cold meteorology, WRF is run for
5 years to characterize the mass balance on this new ice cap. This new run is
the start of the next iteration. Thus, each iteration begins with a WRF run
and ends after the 500-year ice model integration.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e910">In the context of glacial inception, expanding ice cover interacts with the
atmosphere, causing changes to both the regional climate and atmospheric
circulation near Baffin Island. We first examine the progression of the
WRF–ice model iterations, looking at the expansion of ice cover and the
resultant changes in mass balance. Then, in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>, the changes
in mass balance are explained by exploring changes in temperature, ablation,
precipitation, and cloud cover. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>, we take a closer
look at the regional circulation. Additional sensitivity simulations with the
ice sheet model further clarify climate factors that could lead to Baffin
Island glaciation in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS5"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e921">Ice growth due to WRF–ice model iterations:
<bold>(a)</bold> the ice thickness from the ice sheet model and <bold>(b)</bold> the
mass balance from WRF. The average mass balance over ice-covered areas for
each iteration is included in the right column.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e936">The progression of WRF–ice model iterations (5 years of WRF and 500 years of
the ice model) is laid out in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. The ice
thickness calculated by the ice model and then used in WRF is depicted in the
left column, and the resulting annual mass balance from WRF in the right
column. Also included in the right column is the spatial average of mass
balance on the ice cap (defined as all grid cells with ice land cover type).
Starting with the top left, we show the ice thickness resulting from running
the ice model for 500 years using the Iteration 1 WRF mass balance (Fig. 1b, c).
This new ice thickness, ice extent, and surface elevation computed by the ice
model are used as inputs to the next WRF simulation. Then, WRF is run for
5 years resulting in the mass balance presented in the right column. After
the second iteration of WRF, we bin the mass balance by elevation (as seen in
Fig. 1c) and force the ice model with this new updated mass balance. A new
ice cover is computed (Fig. 2a, second row) and used as an input in WRF. Subsequent iterations
pictured follow the same procedure (going down Fig. 2, left to right).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e944">Characterizing annual mass balance vs.
surface elevation. The domain is sorted into 100 m bins, and within each bin
the mass balance is averaged. Elevations falling within the range of the bin
have the associated mass balance.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018-f03.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e953">The second iteration has the greatest ice extent, which is due to the large
positive Iteration 1 mass balance. In the third iteration, the ice retreats
from its margins, though there is<?pagebreak page1446?> still growth in the highest parts of the
domain. Additional iterations show that the ice cap coalesces and increases
in thickness to nearly 2000 m but expands slowly into new areas. After
5 kyrs, the ice accumulation on Baffin Island would only lower global sea
level by 0.6 m. Although the average mass balance does generally increase
with time, the rest of our analysis focuses on why the ice does not expand
quickly.</p>
      <p id="d1e956">The binned mass balance used in the ice model is plotted in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> with annual mass balance on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis and
surface elevation on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis. The Iteration 1 WRF run is the “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>”
blue line with the most positive mass balance, particularly at the lowest and
highest elevations. In subsequent WRF runs, the mass balance up to 1000 m
becomes more negative at low elevations, which we find surprising. One might
expect the equilibrium line to shift downslope as a result of regional
cooling from the initial expansion of the ice cover, leading to a more
positive mass balance. However, plotting the binned mass balance for all
iterations shows a general trend of increasingly more negative mass balances
at low elevations, with the equilibrium line altitude shifting upwards by
several hundred meters over the course of 10 iterations. As a result, the ice
caps coalesce and thicken at high elevations but stagnate and fail to expand
horizontally. The mass balance at highest elevations from all iterations also
illustrates desertification or the mass balance becoming less positive over
time as the ice cap increases in height and its top surface flattens.</p>
      <p id="d1e982">Lateral expansion is slow because the lower terrain on Baffin Island is not
strongly sloped. Thus, ice must build up to a substantial height before the
spread of ice outweighs ablation at the ice edge. For example, with flat
basal topography, calculations based on Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) and
(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>)
suggest that a 0.5 m yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of ice thickness increase due to ice flow in
a grid cell with no ice requires an adjacent grid cell ice thickness around
500 m. This approximate ice thickness on the margins occurs in our
simulations as depicted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1002">The summer 2 m
temperature in select asynchronous coupling iterations: <bold>(a)</bold> the
temperature in the Iteration 1 WRF run. Differences in temperature between
Iteration 1 and the <bold>(b)</bold> second and <bold>(c)</bold> last iterations.
Note that “bin” refers to the mass balance binning procedure used in each
iteration.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018-f04.pdf"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Mechanisms of changes in mass balance</title>
      <p id="d1e1026">A closer examination of temperature, melting, and precipitation can help us
how the ice cap growth causes the changes to mass balance in the WRF
simulations. We begin with the 2 m temperature on Baffin Island during the
summer (June, July, August) when melting occurs. The differences in the
temperature between the Iteration 1 run and subsequent iterations are
pictured in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. In the
Iteration 1 simulation, we note that most of the ice-covered land remains
below freezing during the summer (blue). At the edge of the ice cap,
temperatures generally remain near zero (white), and the low-elevation tundra
is above freezing (red). The largest expansion of ice cover occurs in the
second iteration as noted above, which dramatically cools much of the region
mostly due to the presence of snow and the albedo change. Also, note that the
upper part of the ice cap also cools, likely due to increasing elevation,
since 500 years of ice growth increased the surface elevation by 200 m. In
the third iteration, the ice has retreated somewhat, which makes the low
elevations warmer than in the second iteration. The integrated mass balance
becomes more positive as seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. As
iterations of WRF and the ice model continue, we find that the area covered
in ice cools, but the low-elevation tundra area surrounding the ice cap
warms. The lapse rate effect due to increasing surface elevation
progressively cools the ice cap, and below we explore why the low-elevation
tundra warms in successive iterations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1035">Melting in WRF in select iterations: <bold>(a)</bold> melting in the
Iteration 1 WRF run. Differences in melting between Iteration 1 and the
<bold>(b)</bold> second and <bold>(c)</bold> last iterations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1053">The mass balance is made up of ablation and precipitation. When precipitation
is larger than ablation, the ice cap grows. We are interested in how both
metrics change over the iterations of the coupled WRF–ice sheet models. We
start by examining the melting over the summer, and how it relates to the
temperature discussed above. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a depicts the
yearly melt in the Iteration 1 simulation. In general, the high-elevation parts
of the region experience no melting during the summer due to their
subfreezing temperatures. As the ice cover expands, the highest values of
melting are located<?pagebreak page1447?> near the edges of the ice cap. As expected, melting
decreases as the surface elevation increases.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1061">Annual
precipitation in WRF in select iterations: <bold>(a)</bold> the precipitation in
the Iteration 1 WRF run. Precipitation differences between Iteration 1 and
the <bold>(b)</bold> second and <bold>(c)</bold> last iterations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1079">Next, we look at the precipitation component of the mass balance. In this
region, precipitation increases with elevation due to the orography
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). For glacial inception, continued snowfall
is critical in addition to low ablation. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b
and c depict the differences in precipitation between the Iteration 1
simulation and ice model iterations. We see an elevation desert effect that
reduces precipitation by 200 mm year<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the annual
precipitation. The highest elevations receive less precipitation as the
iterations go on. However, at the edges of the ice cap, precipitation
increases, because the change in elevation and surface slope triggers
orographic precipitation there. It is interesting that precipitation
increases with ice growth in the Barnes region of the ice cap, which may be a
necessary condition for glacial inception to occur. The accumulation
increases on the western side of Baffin Island, which is also the windward
side, and as noted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="normal.76"/>, a characteristic of the inception
process. This general increase in precipitation near the margins agrees with
the maps of the mass balance (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) indicating the
greatest mass balances do not occur on the peaks of the island but at about
1200 m elevation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1119">The summer cloud
radiative forcing (CRF) in select iterations: <bold>(a)</bold> the CRF in the
Iteration 1 WRF run. Differences in CRF between Iteration 1 and the
<bold>(b)</bold> second and <bold>(c)</bold> last iterations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1137">Finally, we are interested in the role that clouds may play in glacial
inception. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="normal.77"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="normal.78"/> found clouds to be
negative feedback during glacial inception. When insolation is changed from
present day to that appropriate for the time of glacial inception at
115 kya, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="normal.79"/> noted that less low clouds form during glacial
inception, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="normal.80"/> found that cloud properties change
such that relative to present day, less shortwave radiation is blocked from the
surface. Our objective here is to examine this feedback during the
integration of our asynchronously coupled model. In
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>, the net<?pagebreak page1448?> cloud
radiative forcing (CRF) in the Iteration 1 simulation is
negative during the summer because the clouds block shortwave radiation from
reaching the surface. However, as the ice cover expands, the clouds block
less shortwave radiation, illustrated by the positive net shortwave CRF
difference between later iterations and the Iteration 1 run: the Iteration 1
simulation net CRF is more negative in all parts of the domain. The albedo of
increasing snow cover accounts for less negative CRF over newly glaciated
areas, but the change to the shortwave CRF in the rest of the domain is due
to changes in cloud cover and properties.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p id="d1e1156">Changes in 500 mbar
geopotential height in the parent domain in select iterations with wind
vectors. Wind speeds are 6 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over Baffin Island. <bold>(a)</bold> The
500 mbar geopotential height for the Iteration 1 simulation with average
large-scale flow during the summer and <bold>(b–c)</bold> 500 mbar geopotential
height differences during the summer between Iteration 1 and Iterations 2 and
10. Wind anomalies of 1 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are overlaid.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Interaction of Baffin Island inception and atmospheric circulation</title>
      <p id="d1e1201">We find the significant warming over Baffin Island to be surprising, as one
might expect the expanded ice cover over the peaks of Baffin Island to lead
to cooling (which would amplify the positive mass balance and lead to a
larger ice sheet). We now analyze the warming by looking at the regional
geopotential height field, temperature, and winds in the outer domain. First,
the geopotential height and winds at 500 mbar for the Iteration 1 simulation
during the summer are depicted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>. The winds over Baffin
Island generally come from the northwest with a low pressure trough covering
the whole island. A weak cyclonic flow also exists over the island and Baffin
Bay. Next, we examine the subsequent iterations and their anomalies in the
winds and geopotential height at 500 mbar in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b–c. The
pressure increases south of Baffin Island, while it decreases over Baffin Bay
to the north, and an anomalous anticyclone forms over the Hudson Bay region.
It seems that the larger ice caps on Baffin Island alter the circulation, and
we will examine this hypothesis below.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1210">Summer 2 m temperature in the parent domain in select iterations: <bold>(a)</bold> the 2 m temperature
for Iteration 1 and <bold>(b–c)</bold> 2 m temperature differences during the
summer between Iteration 1 and iterations 2 and 10.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018-f09.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1225">The 2 m temperature response in the outer domain (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>) is
consistent with the changes in geopotential height. The Iteration 1
simulation is depicted in the upper left with subsequent panels showing
differences in the following iterations. On the ice caps of Baffin Island,
the temperature generally grows colder because the elevation has increased,
and newly glaciated areas cool due to both the presence of ice and the
elevation increase. As iterations progress, the non-glaciated points of the
island warm, which is also seen in the inner domain. Additionally, warming
occurs outside of Baffin Island in the Hudson Bay region. These areas of
warming, coinciding with geopotential height anomalies, appear to be caused
by the circulation response, with warm southerly advection by the anomalous
anticyclone.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p id="d1e1233">Scatter plots of
summer (JJA) maximum <bold>(a)</bold> temperature anomaly and <bold>(b)</bold>
geopotential height anomaly over Baffin Island vs. maximum ice elevation in
each iteration.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1248">This warming appears to be a negative feedback on ice sheet growth, and it
explains the mass balances becoming more negative at low elevations on Baffin
Island through subsequent iterations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). With a
region so close to freezing during the summer, even a degree warming can
prevent perennial snow from occurring during the critical<?pagebreak page1449?> inception period.
As a caveat, we note that with the elevation in the coarser outer domain
being generally lower than the 20 km resolution domain, the temperatures on
Baffin Island are much warmer than is likely realistic. For instance, we do
not see any summer temperatures significantly below freezing as found in the
inner domain with more realistic topography.</p>
      <p id="d1e1253">It is known that regional models can develop artificial anomalous
circulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.81"/>, and it is important to verify that the
negative feedback identified here is not strongly affected by such artifacts.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> shows two scatter plots of the temperature anomaly and
the geopotential anomaly as function of ice height for Iterations 2–10. The
anomalous circulation and heating develop progressively with the ice growth,
suggesting that the anomalous circulation is driven by the changing ice
topography and is likely not an artifact. We further investigate the effect
of topography in the following section. The geopotential anomaly increases
with ice height, with the exception of the last iteration when the ice
sheet topography becomes more of a plateau. Given that the temperature anomaly
is still strong in this last iteration, the feedback is still valid through
this last iteration. The response we find is consistent with previous studies
which noted that the size of the mountain is critical to the orographic
response <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.82"/> and slight changes to
topography can cause significant changes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="paren.83"/>. We speculate
that the physical mechanism underlying the topography-induced anticyclone
might be related to mixing of shallow-water potential vorticity (PV) by
eddies near a localized high point in a weak background flow. Lateral eddy
diffusion near a high point would stir high-PV air (due to lower thicknesses)
away from the high terrain. The anticyclone is created by the influx of
lower-PV air from the surrounding environment. The anticyclone would
theoretically increase in strength as the surface height increased, as seen
in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>. This assumes eddy mixing to be unchanged, which
may explain the weakened anomaly in Iteration 10. The anomaly seen here
differs from the more commonly considered atmospheric situation where
advection of PV by the mean flow dominates horizontal mixing. A more thorough
consideration of this simplified problem, including eddy mixing, mean flow,
and planetary vorticity gradients, is left as a subject for future work.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>The impact of Baffin Island ice elevation on regional circulation</title>
      <p id="d1e1275">Next, we diagnose the roles of ice and topography on circulation changes by
setting up sensitivity simulations based on the second iteration, which has
changes in ice extent and surface elevation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>).
For our “no <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” scenario, we keep the surface elevation the same as the
Iteration 1 simulation but use the same ice extent as in the second
iteration. For an “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> only” scenario, we remove all ice, changing the land
type classification to tundra. We then set the surface elevation to the ice
height in the second iteration. These two<?pagebreak page1450?> additional simulations were run for
5 years with cold meteorology and 115 kya insolation, and the analysis
focuses on the last 4 years.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1296">Changes in 2 m summer temperature in the parent domain for topography and ice sensitivity
simulations. <bold>(a)</bold> The 2 m temperature for the Iteration 1 simulation
averaged during the summer (JJA). <bold>(b)</bold> Differences during the summer between
Iterations 1 and 2. <bold>(c)</bold> Differences between the Iteration 1 and “no <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>”.
<bold>(d)</bold> Differences between Iteration 1 and “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> only”.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018-f11.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1332">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>, we examine the temperature of the outer domain for
four experiments. Again, the Iteration 1 simulation summer temperature and
difference from the second iteration (having both ice and elevation changes)
are shown, but we also include the “no <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” and “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> only” scenarios, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>c and d,
respectively. With “no <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>”, a significant regional cooling occurs,
encompassing both Baffin Island and the Hudson Bay region, which is the
pattern we had anticipated to cause rapid ice growth. However, with “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
only”, warming on both Baffin Island and around Hudson Bay occurs. The
geopotential height anomalies presented in Fig. S2 in the Supplement  agree with
the temperature patterns seen here. Thus, the cause of the negative feedback
due to large-scale anticyclonic circulation and warming in our simulations is
the change in topography. An interesting aspect of these last two simulations
(“no <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” and “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> only”) is that if we sum the difference between their
response and the Iteration 1 simulation, the result is very close to the
difference between the Iteration 2 and the Iteration 1 runs, as seen in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>. This indicates that the responses to the ice
topography and ice land type (albedo and other surface properties) are
linear.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1387"><bold>(a)</bold> Differences
during the summer 2 m temperature between the first and second iterations.
<bold>(b)</bold> Sum of temperature differences from “no <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” and “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> only” scenarios,
implying a linear response due to changes in ice cover and surface elevation</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018-f12.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page1451?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Glacial inception with changing orbital parameters</title>
      <p id="d1e1423">The WRF–ice model iterations performed previously used the minimum insolation
from 115 kya, which is useful for diagnosing the relationship between the ice
cover and atmosphere. However, that is obviously not realistic. Integrated
insolation increased after its minimum at 115 kya, impacting temperature and
glacial mass balance. We use the procedure detailed in the Appendix of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="normal.84"/> to set the insolation in WRF for 115–111 kya. After
each WRF run, the ice model is integrated for 500 years using the same mass
balance procedure as detailed above. This set of simulations explores the
mass balance that results from a combination of ice flow and insolation
changes.</p>
      <p id="d1e1429">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/> presents the mass balances calculated from WRF and
used in each iteration of the ice model. Note the Iteration 1 simulation and
second iteration plotted here are the same as presented in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> because the change in insolation occurs at
114 kya, which is the third iteration in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>. The
elevation desert effect is again observed, and the mass balances become more
negative at low elevations, hindering lateral growth. Thus, these iterations
progress in a similar manner as the case with constant insolation in that the
lateral growth is slow though the height of the ice sheets does grow, but the
high-elevation plateaus can be 200 m lower than the previous set of
simulations with constant 115 kya. In this set of simulations with realistic
insolation, the mass balances at low elevations are more negative, explaining
the slower growth (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e1440">During the summer on Baffin Island, there is again cooling from the presence
of ice, but the unglaciated parts of Baffin Island warm considerably. As the
summer insolation increases, the summer temperature of all of North America,
not just the Hudson Bay region, increases as well. When we look at the
precipitation in the domain, we observe a similar pattern to the previous set
of simulations. Accumulation increases on the edges of the ice cap due to
orographic precipitation. Then, at the top of the ice cap, the elevation
desert effect kicks in. The ice cap continually receives less precipitation
than in the Iteration 1 simulation. The increases in insolation cause
continental-scale warming, and when combined with topography changes, the
warming on Baffin Island can be over 5 K (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>).
Thus, the realistic insolation changes cause further warming during
inception, which makes the occurrence of inception even more difficult to
explain and simulate.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><caption><p id="d1e1447">The mass balance
binned by elevation used in simulations with realistic insolation from
115  to 111 kya, where the first and second iterations use 115 kya
insolation, third and fourth use 114 kya insolation, and so forth to
Iteration 10 with 111 kya.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018-f13.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Sensitivity analysis of the ice flow model</title>
      <p id="d1e1462">The combination of WRF and the ice flow model does not indicate ice sheets
would grow to cover all of Baffin Island, which would likely be necessary to
explain the sea-level drop found in the paleo-record. The change in ice
surface elevation actually causes a negative feedback on inception by
affecting the large-scale circulation: temperatures around the ice increase
inhibiting ice expansion. This result suggests a closer examination of the
ice model and its sensitivities. In particular, we vary the creep parameter
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to see if rapid ice expansion is possible with different constant
choices. We also explore how a successful inception – matching paleo-record
estimates – could occur from our simulated mass balance function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and limiting the calving loss of ice in Hudson Bay. The ice model in these
sensitivity experiments is now run for 10 kyrs, unlike our previous
asynchronous simulations that ran for 5 kyrs total.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1491">The surface
temperature in the Iteration 1 run, and differences for successive
iterations with insolation changes: <bold>(a)</bold> 115kya, <bold>(b)</bold> 114 kya, and <bold>(c)</bold> 111 kya.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018-f14.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1509">First, we identify if we have simulated a mass balance sufficient for a
successful inception. From Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, we note that the mass
balance in the Iteration 1 simulation is the most positive at high elevations
and least negative at low elevations. All subsequent WRF runs simulate a
negative mass balance at low surface elevations. Using the Iteration 1<?pagebreak page1452?> mass
balance, the ice model is integrated over 10 kyrs. Of course, this situation
is not realistic as our set of simulations shows changes in mass balance due
to circulation changes as the ice sheet grows. We prescribe the mass balance
only on Baffin Island, which was the location of our inner domain, and this
causes Baffin Island to be mostly covered by ice, corresponding to 1.75 m
sea level drop over 10 kyrs. Ice model simulations forced with the mass
balances from Iterations 2–10 never reach the western coast of Baffin Island
in 10 kyrs.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1517">Sensitivity of the ice model to choice of constant creep parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is related to
the temperature profile within the ice as detailed by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="normal.85"/>. <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> evaluated at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C); <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C); <bold>(c)</bold>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018-f15.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1639">As noted above, we choose the creep parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C))
based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="normal.86"/>. We now test the sensitivity of the ice
flow when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is evaluated at warmer and colder temperatures, or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), respectively. For these
simulations, the mass balance used is from the Iteration 1 WRF simulations,
and when run for 500 years, the ice model changes are minor. We confirm with
WRF simulations that these slight changes in ice elevation from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) do not significantly affect
the mass balance in the second iteration; the ice still retreats. Thus, we
want to examine how the creep parameter affects ice flow on longer
timescales, which is why we<?pagebreak page1453?> integrate the ice model in time for 10 kyrs. We
expect that a warmer temperature and thus larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> would allow the ice to
spread more easily, leading to larger ice cover. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>
shows that changing the creep parameter can increase or decrease the
thickness of a Baffin Island ice cap by about 20 % but does not alter the
ice extent much after 10 kyr. On average, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) causes the
elevation to be 200 m higher than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). More calving occurs
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) ice reaching the coast sooner. We also examine the
impact of temperatures at about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>c),
which <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="normal.87"/> determined to be the basal temperature of the
initial ice sheet growth. As expected, the ice flows more slowly and
accumulates at high elevations. These sensitivities to the creep parameter,
however, are small compared to the sensitivity of ice extent and thickness to
the mass balance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as inferred from successive iterations of WRF.</p>
      <p id="d1e1890">We also question what would happen if we apply the Iteration 1 mass balance
to a larger area, outside of Baffin Island and our chosen domain. Based on
the temperature and precipitation patterns of the outer domain, the other
side of Hudson Bay could have a similar mass balance, especially if the
domain were resolved at a higher resolution. We do not include the Torngat
Mountains on mainland Canada just to the south of Baffin Island, as this area
appears to receive less precipitation and experience higher temperatures.
This agrees with observations on the lack of ice today, indicating the
possibility of later glacierization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.88"/>. The ice
accumulation with the positive mass balance from our Iteration 1 WRF
simulation on mainland Canada causes an equivalent sea level drop of 2.8 m
in 10 kyrs.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16"><caption><p id="d1e1898">The result of
running the ice model for 10 kyrs with the maximum mass balance, found in
the first WRF iteration. <bold>(a)</bold> Allowing a positive mass balance on
mainland Canada, surrounding all of Hudson Bay. <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
extrapolated to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Hudson Bay, which allows for ice flow instead of
immediate calving of ice. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/14/1441/2018/cp-14-1441-2018-f16.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1945">The previous simulations assume immediate calving over any ocean points,
which makes sense for the kilometer-deep Baffin Bay. The topography on the
eastern side of Baffin Island is steep, possibly preventing ice shelves from
forming. However, Hudson Bay is only about 200 m deep. We turn off immediate
calving for this shallow water body and instead prescribe a negative mass
balance. We extend the regression <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> linearly to the bathymetry of Hudson
Bay. This allows for ice to flow slowly into a larger area surrounding Baffin
Island, creating a fairly large ice sheet and corresponding to a sea level
drop of 6.6 m. This last scenario gets close to more recent constraints of
sea level drop from modeling simulations at around 100 kya of 10 m
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.89"/>. This growth of the ice sheet corresponds a
successful inception, though still on the slower side of observational
constraints, suggesting that the negative feedback due to the response of<?pagebreak page1454?> the
large-scale circulation to expanding ice cover is what prevents our
asynchronously coupled model from achieving a successful inception.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e1972">In this paper, we have attempted to simulate the last glacial inception
beginning at 115 kya with a regional high-resolution configuration of WRF,
coupled asynchronously with a simple ice flow model. A net positive mass
balance occurs in the first WRF iteration simulation driven by 115 kya
insolation, cold present-day (1986) boundary conditions, and present-day ice
cover. If the mass balance from this first iteration was maintained, an ice
sheet could cover all of Baffin Island after 10 kyr. However, updating the
ice cover and surface elevation in WRF creates a negative feedback from
changes in the large-scale circulation: summer temperatures over Baffin
Island increase due to a regional anticyclonic circulation. This causes the
mass balance over Baffin Island to become more negative at low elevations,
stagnating further ice expansion in the ice flow model. This is reminiscent
of the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="normal.90"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="normal.91"/>, who noted the continued growth of the ice sheet
is slowed by changes in large-scale circulation that arise from
atmosphere–topography interactions. While the studies of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="normal.92"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="normal.93"/> found the
negative feedback slowed ice growth mostly when the ice sheet was fairly
developed, of a continental scale, the negative feedback analyzed here occurs
upon inception, as soon as the ice caps over Baffin Island begin to
grow. Previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.94"/>
could not resolve this feedback with their coarse-resolution GCMs, while our
coupled ice sheet – regional atmospheric model enables us to examine it.</p>
      <p id="d1e1990">The flow over Baffin Island driven by the 1986 boundary conditions is
consistently from the northwest during the summer, with weak speeds of about
6 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 500 mbar. The increase in the ice surface elevation after
the first iterations of the coupled model causes an anticyclonic response of
about 1 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to develop to the south of Baffin Island, while a cyclone
develops in the north, diverting the winds and bringing in warmer air from
the south. This leads to net ablation and arrests the glaciation process.
This circulation response is likely dependent on the initial flow (direction
and speed) and topographic height
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.95"/>. Thus, a different meteorology
choice might lead to sustained accumulation. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="normal.96"/>
identified exceptionally cold conditions on Baffin Island and their varying
large-scale circulation patterns. Generally, the cold summer circulation
flows from the northwest or north–northwest. We examine the role of
meteorology directly using boundary conditions that differ from those used in
our cold meteorology simulations. For this purpose, WRF is driven using 1979
boundary conditions, which is an average year in regards to temperature and
precipitation, and the flow over Baffin Island generally comes from the west.
WRF simulates a negative mass balance for this year, and the ice sheet
retreats to an elevation above 1400 m when the ice model is forced with this
mass balance for 500 years. In contrast, the ice cap from our average 1979
meteorology at a 4 km resolution was in approximate equilibrium, leaning
towards slight expansion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.97"/>. Net ablation occurs in the
20 km resolution because of the lower topography. It is possible that during
inception the circulation pattern was different and allowed for both the
initial ice expansion and continued cold conditions. WRF did not simulate
such a pattern in this study, nor did the few “cold” meteorological
conditions in the ERA-Interim reanalysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e2026">We find significant warming on Baffin Island and the surrounding Hudson Bay
region in response to the initial ice growth due to anticyclonic flow. The
formation of anticyclones over expanding ice sheets has been noted to allow
cold northerly winds to flow over the ice sheet, enhancing inception
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.98"/>. In particular, small ice sheets
cause a wave response that enhances accumulation, while stationary waves
induce less cooling as ice sheets increase in size <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.99"/>.
In contrast, the anticyclone in our simulations forms south of the ice
growing on Baffin Island, bringing significant warming even over these
relatively small mountain glaciers. Similar to our study,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="normal.100"/> found the Hudson Bay warmed in their coupled
atmosphere–ice simulations due to anticyclonic flow.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="normal.101"/> also found warming on the margins from
anticyclones and reduced cloudiness. In both of these studies, though, the
warming only slowed growth; the regional cooling due to the growing ice sheet
kept the ice advancing. We find the heat fluxes into the region by the
developing anticyclone circulation to completely overpower any regional
cooling from the snow–albedo feedback, stagnating the ice sheet growth. We do
observe the development of katabatic winds in response to ice sheet growth in
our model, possibly contributing to the drying out of the region and
decreasing cloud cover, but these winds do not cool the area outside of the
glaciers sufficiently to allow for inception.</p>
      <p id="d1e2041">We do not find a positive feedback that would lead to a more positive mass
balance due to the initial ice growth. However, some of our assumptions and
modeling choices could be preventing such a positive feedback. For instance,
our WRF simulations prescribe the SSTs and sea ice to those of 1986, but
during glacial inception the SST could decrease and sea ice extent grow
larger <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.102"/>. Allowing the SST to cool has been shown to
induce cooling over land, even if the atmosphere is relatively warm
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx105" id="paren.103"/>, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="normal.104"/> noted that storm
tracks change with colder SSTs in a manner conducive for inception. In
contrast, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91" id="normal.105"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx35" id="normal.106"/>
argued that the oceans change slower than the atmosphere, so the oceans<?pagebreak page1455?> may
remain warmer and ice free at the beginning of inception.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="normal.107"/> argued that SSTs remained warm until 105 kya, when
substantial ice sheets had formed. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="normal.108"/> noted that the
northern Atlantic remained close to modern-day temperatures through 115 kya
until glacial stage 5d around 110 kya. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96" id="normal.109"/> argued that
observations support a warm ocean, similar to an interglacial, during
inception, though their focus is on the Southern Hemisphere. Some past GCM
studies yielding some degree of glacial inception have also found Atlantic
Ocean temperatures to remain similar to the present day
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx80" id="paren.110"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2073">Oceans may also affect moisture availability, not just heat fluxes. The
amount of sea ice can impact accumulation over the ice sheet
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104 bib1.bibx61" id="paren.111"/> due to decreasing
atmospheric moisture and evaporation from ocean, according to the
temperature–precipitation feedback <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx66" id="paren.112"/>. Some studies argued that the
cooling during inception did not cause sea ice to extend outside of Baffin
Bay until 80 kya <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.113"/>, meaning the Atlantic
remained ice free, which was conducive to high precipitation. Both
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="normal.114"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="normal.115"/> found that including
ocean feedbacks caused increased moisture fluxes conducive to inception,
while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="normal.116"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="normal.117"/> noted that
storm frequency increased. Including ocean feedbacks could lead to increased
moisture fluxes and thus precipitation, or it could lead to cooler
temperatures decreasing melting, which could be more important for inception.
With present-day fluxes prescribed at the boundaries, and the focus of this
study being regional feedbacks, we keep SSTs at modern values for
consistency, and effectively investigate the “warm” interglacial
temperature ocean scenario, which does have support in observations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.118"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2101">We fix the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration to 290 ppm, although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
decreased during inception. This decrease has been shown to influence the
accumulation of Northern Hemisphere ice sheets
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx95" id="paren.119"/>, accounting for up to 50 %
more ice <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.120"/>. We also do not allow for dynamic
vegetation, but on Baffin Island the tree canopy does not exist. Most of
these studies dealing with dynamic vegetation refer to the treeline moving
southward during glacial inception
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.121"/>, enhancing ice growth, but
on Baffin Island the vegetation is mostly tundra and small shrubs, which are
not an impediment to snow accumulation as trees would be
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.122"/>. However, the absence of
dynamic vegetation means we cannot explore the cooling effects of albedo
changes outside of Baffin Island due to vegetation changes. The southward
treeline trend and the subsequent albedo impact, though, have been shown to
occur later in the inception process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.123"/>, justifying
our neglect of this feedback.</p>
      <p id="d1e2142">We choose to drive our model with meteorology conducive to a glaciation
inception, and force the model with anomalously high precipitation and cool
temperatures over Baffin Island in 1986. We are assuming that the planetary
waves' response to the growing Laurentide ice sheet <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101" id="paren.124"/> was
not significant until the size of the Laurentide was substantial, as has been
found in other modeling studies of glacial inception
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.125"/>. The regional flow induced by these boundary
conditions in conjunction with ice growth causes the negative feedback
discussed above. The strength of this negative regional feedback that
prevents inception from proceeding suggests that a reorganization of the
planetary-scale Northern Hemisphere circulation could occur as part of the
inception process and counter the regional negative feedback. We cannot
capture such a change in the general circulation with our regional model and
prescribed boundary conditions, indicating a study of non-local processes
could complement this study of local Baffin Island feedbacks. For instance,
the Laurentide ice sheet and Fennoscandian ice sheet in Europe are thought to
have begun growing at the same time, though the Laurentide increased in
volume more rapidly <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.126"/>. The
European ice sheet may have influenced the formation of the Laurentide
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.127"/>, but such a feedback is missing in our
regional model. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="normal.128"/> noted that changes in the stationary
wave pattern would affect the downstream climate.</p>
      <p id="d1e2160">We limit our study to Baffin Island based on geological records of it being
the nucleation of the Laurentide, but regional modeling of other Canadian
mountain ranges could help identify how easily other areas glaciated,
contributing to sea level drop. Growth of ice at high elevations
simultaneously throughout eastern Canada is not impossible, which could all
coalesce into the Laurentide. For instance, various ice sheet models have
shown ice beginning to accumulate all over Canada
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.129"/>. While many of these ice modes do
not match geological records because they simulate the growth of ice in the
west, ice growth on many of the more eastern mountain ranges could perhaps
impact the large-scale circulation in a manner conducive to inception.</p>
      <p id="d1e2166">Though we do find net accumulation in our Iteration 1 simulation using a
20 km resolution, there are inherent issues that come from this resolution.
The topography of Baffin Island is very rough but is greatly smoothed by the
20 km resolution. More importantly, the highest elevation peaks with 20 km
resolution are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m below the peaks found in realistic Baffin Island
topography. Our simulation with average meteorology demonstrates that
resolution increases can easily switch the mass balance from net accumulation
to net ablation. For cold meteorology, the resulting mass balance is similar
to what we found with a 4 km resolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.130"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2182">To get an average mass balance to drive the ice sheet model, WRF is run for
5 years; we use the average mass<?pagebreak page1456?> balance from the last 4 years. We find that
the land model required a 1-year spin-up time, although often a spin-up time
of more than a year is recommended
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.131"/>. We tested running the model for
longer than 10 years, but the simulations did not deviate much
from years 2–5 of our simulations. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="normal.132"/> showed that
multiple ensemble members of an atmospheric model simulation can give
different results on a timescale up to 50 years, but this may not be an
issue here because we are driving our regional model with ideal inception
boundary conditions that constrain the synoptic and planetary-scale flows
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.133"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2195">Using the shallow ice approximation neglects important ice dynamics; in
particular, it neglects lateral stresses and does not allow for the
development of ice streams, which cause rapid ice flow. It has also been
suggested that a finer grid size in the ice model could make for more
accurate flow, as coarser resolutions have been shown to halt ice flow
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx92" id="paren.134"/>. As noted above, lateral expansion only occurs when
substantial ice thickness exists in an adjacent grid cell. However, we find
that simulations with a 4 km resolution (Fig. S6 in the Supplement) yield similar
ice flow patterns to the 20 km results we present here. We are neglecting
basal sliding that could occur as the ice base melts due to geothermal heat flux
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.135"/>, but the initiating ice sheet was likely frozen at
the bed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="paren.136"/>, which makes our choice
appropriate. Finally, we are not accounting for glacial isostatic adjustment.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="normal.137"/> found that the isostatic adjustment was not
critical for glacial inception, though including the adjustment revealed a
small positive feedback. Therefore, contrary to conventional wisdom, these
studies suggest that isostatic adjustment might actually favor glacial
inception over Baffin Island, and may even be critical to the process by
reducing the strength of negative elevation–circulation feedbacks on ice
growth (as in the “no <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” sensitivity test). Our binning procedure and the
resulting surface mass balance (SMB) forcing routine, while simple, are consistent with the way many
simple ice sheet models are forced. More importantly, the results of this
procedure, showing that ice elevation causes a negative warming feedback,
should be robust regardless of how the ice elevation was calculated, as it is
a result of the atmospheric model itself. We found that finer bin sizes did
not significantly affect the expansion of ice. However, it would be good to
test alternative SMB routines, such as using mean monthly air temperatures and
precipitation from the previous WRF integrations, and downscale them to the
surface elevation of ice grid points.</p>
      <p id="d1e2217">Though we find negative feedbacks on the growth of ice sheets due to clouds
and circulation preventing inception in our model, high-resolution regional
modeling still has the potential to make progress on the inception problem. We
have captured the mass balance on critical mountainous regions in our
Iteration 1 run, which GCMs cannot simulate accurately. When combined with
ice flow, the Iteration 1 mass balance causes a significant portion of Baffin
Island and the surrounding area to become ice covered. Though the equivalent
sea level drop is only 6 m in 10 kyrs, the geological constraints on sea
level drop from the Laurentide are not tight, and the calculated sea level
drop may be consistent with more recent sea level estimates
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.138"/>. However, this scenario neglects the
ice–elevation feedback on the atmosphere that we found significant. Given the
geological importance of Baffin Island on glacial inception, additional work
is needed to understand how Baffin Island cooled against two warming
influences: the regional anticyclone circulation and increasing insolation
from 115 kya onward. The warming feedback due to local circulation changes
that we find could be mitigated by changes in the pattern of large-scale
atmospheric circulation, including stationary and planetary waves. Using a
circumpolar regional model could potentially capture the mass balance of the
nucleation points of both the Laurentide and Fennoscandian ice sheets at a
sufficiently high resolution, allowing an investigation in the downstream
interplay of these two ice sheets. Another interesting study could involve
exploring the possible impact of a smaller Greenland ice sheet upon exiting
the last interglacial. Going a step further to more non-local feedbacks (such
as SST changes) influenced by changing orbital parameters, a next step would
be simulating the last glacial inception with a GCM and using the results as
boundary conditions in a regional model.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e2228">The scripts used and the model output are available upon request to the corresponding author.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><app-group>

<?pagebreak page1457?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title>Shallow ice model set-up</title>
      <p id="d1e2240">The simple ice sheet model is based off of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="normal.139"/>, where
ice flow is represented by a non-linear diffusion equation and the
diffusivity contains a constant term called the creep factor. This parameter
determines the ice viscosity and depends on the temperature of the ice
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.140"/>, meaning it can be denoted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as illustrated in
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E1"/>):
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M102" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, then <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.61</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Pa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> J mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, but if
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, then <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.734</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Pa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">139</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> J mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2508">The surface of the ice is colder than the base, meaning that throughout a
real ice sheet, temperature, and thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, varies. In fact, the basal
temperature often reaches 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for thick enough ice sheets. For an
ice model using the shallow ice approximation, the standard procedure is to
take the vertical average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.141"/> in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E2"/>):
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M120" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2596">Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varies by height, we need a vertical temperature profile
within the ice sheet. We calculate it using the average temperature of the
ice surface from WRF and a geothermal heat flux of 55 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, assuming
a linear vertical temperature profile. We then evaluate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for this
temperature profile as found in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E1"/>) and take the vertical
average. Typically, this vertical average is influenced by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the
warmer temperatures at the base of the ice sheet, since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varies
exponentially with temperature. We calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Pa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is the same as A(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="normal.142"/>. We find that using Robin's solution
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.143"/> instead of a linear profile confirms that the basal
temperature is below freezing, consistent with our shallow ice model
formulation. The basal temperature we use is not far from about
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, also consistent with the basal ice temperature in other
studies of glacial inception <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.144"/>.</p>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <title>Finite difference approximation</title>
      <p id="d1e2781">We can use the flux form for the finite difference approximation. We use
forward Euler and second-order centered difference as seen in
Fig. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E3"/>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the time step, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the node in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
direction, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the node in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> direction.

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M138" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3244">The numerical expression for the diffusivity is presented in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E7"/>):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M139" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close="" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8.5}{8.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="[" close=""><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8.5}{8.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open=""><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.0}{9.0}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced open="[" close=""><mml:mfenced close="" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=""><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.0}{9.0}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open=""><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open=""><mml:mfenced open="" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.0}{9.0}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close="" open="["><mml:mfenced close="" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close="" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.0}{9.0}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="" close=")"><mml:mfenced open="" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e4356">Finally, our use of flux form requires Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E11"/>).

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M140" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E11"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e4650">This model uses a time step of 1 year. At each time step, a new ice
thickness is calculated based the equations<?pagebreak page1458?> above. Then, with the new ice
thickness and basal topography known, a new surface elevation is calculated
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e4673">The edge and center of the ice sheet can cause <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is unrealistic
behavior. Thus, we set a minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, but as noted by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="normal.145"/> and confirmed in our simulations, the ice model does
not depend strongly on this choice.</p>
      <p id="d1e4698">We also characterize the mass balance according to elevation, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
actually <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, the mass balance is also updated after each time
step, since it depends on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For our main set of simulations, we
characterized the mass balance using elevation bins.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4736">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1441-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1441-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
</sec>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e4748">LB performed the research work; all authors contributed to the planning, interpretation, and writing of manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e4754">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4760">This work was funded by the Harvard University Climate Change Solutions Fund and by the
NSF P2C2 program, grant OCE-1602864. Timothy Cronin was supported by NSF
grant AGS-1740533. Eli Tziperman thanks the Weizmann Institute for its
hospitality during parts of this work. We would like to acknowledge
high-performance computing support from Yellowstone (ark:/85065/d7wd3xhc)
provided by NCAR's Computational and Information Systems Laboratory,
sponsored by the National Science Foundation. We would like to thank two
anonymous reviewers and the handling editor, Prof. Marit-Solveig Seidenkrantz, for their guidance in refining this paper. We also thank
Alexander Robel for helpful conversations on the ice model.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Marit-Solveig Seidenkrantz<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Abe-Ouchi et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Abe-Ouchi, A., Segawa, T., and Saito, F.: Climatic Conditions for modelling
the Northern Hemisphere ice sheets throughout the ice age cycle, Clim. Past,
3, 423–438, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-3-423-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-3-423-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Abe-Ouchi et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Abe-Ouchi, A., Saito, F., Kawamura, K., Raymo, M. E., Okuno, J., Takahashi, K.,
and Blatter, H.: Insolation-driven 100,000-year glacial cycles and hysteresis
of ice-sheet volume, Nature, 500, 190–193, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Andrews and Barry(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
Andrews, J. and Barry, R.: Glacial inception and disintegration during the last
glaciation, Ann. Rev. Earth  Pl. Sc., 6, 205–228, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Andrews and Mahaffy(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
Andrews, J. and Mahaffy, M.: Growth rate of the Laurentide Ice Sheet and sea
level lowering (with emphasis on the 115,000 BP sea level low), Quaternary
Res., 6, 167–183, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Andrews and Miller(1972)</label><mixed-citation>
Andrews, J. and Miller, G.: Quarternary history of northern Cumberland
peninsula, Baffin Island, NWT, Canada: Part IV: Maps of the present
glaciation limits and lowest equilibrium line altitude for north and south
Baffin Island, Arctic and Alpine Research,   45–59, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Beghin et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Beghin, P., Charbit, S., Dumas, C., Kageyama, M., Roche, D. M., and Ritz, C.:
Interdependence of the growth of the Northern Hemisphere ice sheets during
the last glaciation: the role of atmospheric circulation, Clim. Past, 10,
345–358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-345-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-10-345-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Birch et al.(2017)Birch, Cronin, and Tziperman</label><mixed-citation>
Birch, L., Cronin, T., and Tziperman, E.: Glacial Inception on Baffin Island:
The Role of Insolation, Meteorology, and Topography, J. Climate, 30,
4047–4064, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Bonelli et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Bonelli, S., Charbit, S., Kageyama, M., Woillez, M.-N., Ramstein, G., Dumas,
C., and Quiquet, A.: Investigating the evolution of major Northern Hemisphere
ice sheets during the last glacial-interglacial cycle, Clim. Past, 5,
329–345, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-5-329-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-5-329-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bromwich et~al.(2002{\natexlab{a}})}}?><label>Bromwich et al.(2002a)</label><mixed-citation>
Bromwich, D. H., Toracinta, E. R., and Wang, S.-H.: Meteorological perspective
on the initiation of the Laurentide Ice Sheet, Quatern. Int., 95,
113–124, 2002a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bromwich et~al.(2002{\natexlab{b}})}}?><label>Bromwich et al.(2002b)</label><mixed-citation>
Bromwich, D. H., Wang, S.-H., and Monaghan, A. J.: ERA-40 representation of the
Arctic atmospheric moisture budget, in: ECMWF Workshop on Reanalysis, ECMWF
Re-Analysis Proj. Rep. Ser,  Citeseer, 3,  287–298,
2002b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Bromwich et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Bromwich, D. H., Toracinta, E. R., Oglesby, R. J., Fastook, J. L., and Hughes,
T. J.: LGM summer climate on the southern margin of the Laurentide Ice Sheet:
wet or dry?, J. Climate, 18, 3317–3338, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Calov et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Calov, R., Ganopolski, A., Petoukhov, V., Claussen, M., Brovkin, V., and
Kubatzki, C.: Transient simulation of the last glacial inception. Part II:
sensitivity and feedback analysis, Clim. Dynam., 24, 563–576, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Cassano et al.(2011)Cassano, Higgins, and
Seefeldt</label><mixed-citation>
Cassano, J. J., Higgins, M. E., and Seefeldt, M. W.: Performance of the Weather
Research and Forecasting model for month-long pan-Arctic simulations, Mon.
Weather Rev., 139, 3469–3488, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Chen and Lin(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, S.-H. and Lin, Y.-L.: Orographic effects on a conditionally unstable flow
over an idealized three-dimensional mesoscale mountain, Meteorol.
Atmos. Phys., 88, 1–21, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Clark et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, P., Clague, J., Curry, B. B., Dreimanis, A., Hicock, S., Miller, G.,
Berger, G., Eyles, N., Lamothe, M., Miller, B., Mott, R. J., Oldale R. N., Stea, R. R., Szabo, J. P., Thorleifson, L. H., and Vincent, J. S.: Initiation and
development of the Laurentide and Cordilleran ice sheets following the last
interglaciation, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 12, 79–114, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Cook and Held(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, K. H. and Held, I. M.: Stationary waves of the ice age climate, J.
Climate, 1, 807–819, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Cortijo et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Cortijo, E., Duplessy, J., Labeyrie, L., Leclaire, H., Duprat, J., and
Van Wearing, T.: Eemian cooling in the Norwegian Sea and North Atlantic ocean
preceding continental ice-sheet growth, Nature, 372, 446–449, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Cosgrove et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Cosgrove, B. A., Lohmann, D., Mitchell, K. E., Houser, P. R., Wood, E. F.,
Schaake, J. C., Robock, A., Sheffield, J., Duan, Q., Luo, L., Wayne Higgins, R., Pinker, R. T., and Tarpley, J. D.: Land
surface model spin-up behavior in the North American Land Data Assimilation
System (NLDAS), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108,   <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003316" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003316</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Creveling et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Creveling, J. R., Mitrovica, J. X., Clark, P. U., Waelbroeck, C., and Pico, T.:
Predicted bounds on peak global mean sea level during marine isotope stages
5a and 5c, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 163, 193–208, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Cuffey and Paterson(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Cuffey, K. M. and Paterson, W. S. B.: The physics of glaciers, Academic Press,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Dee et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi,
S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P.,
Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C.,
Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B.,
Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M.,
Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park,
B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and Vitart,
F.: The<?pagebreak page1460?> ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data
assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
137, 553–597, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.828</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Denis et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Denis, B., Laprise, R., Caya, D., and Côté, J.: Downscaling ability of
one-way nested regional climate models: the Big-Brother Experiment, Clim.
Dynam., 18, 627–646, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>de Noblet et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
de Noblet, N. I., Prentice, I. C., Joussaume, S., Texier, D., Botta, A., and
Haxeltine, A.: Possible role of atmosphere-biosphere interactions in
triggering the Last Glaciation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 3191–3194,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Deser et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Deser, C., Phillips, A. S., Alexander, M. A., and Smoliak, B. V.: Projecting
North American climate over the next 50 years: Uncertainty due to internal
variability, J. Climate, 27, 2271–2296, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Dong and Valdes(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Dong, B. and Valdes, P. J.: Sensitivity studies of Northern Hemisphere
glaciation using an atmospheric general circulation model, J.
Climate, 8, 2471–2496, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Drusch et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Drusch, M., Vasiljevic, D., and Viterbo, P.: ECMWF's global snow analysis:
Assessment and revision based on satellite observations, J. Appl.
Meteorol., 43, 1282–1294, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Dutra et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Dutra, E., Balsamo, G., Viterbo, P., Miranda, P. M., Beljaars, A., Schär,
C., and Elder, K.: An improved snow scheme for the ECMWF land surface model:
Description and offline validation, J. Hydrometeorol., 11,
899–916, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Farrell and Abbot(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Farrell, B. F. and Abbot, D. S.: A mechanism for dust-induced destabilization
of glacial climates, Clim. Past, 8, 2061–2067,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-2061-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-8-2061-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fr{\'{e}}chette et~al.(2006)}}?><label>Fréchette et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Fréchette, B., Wolfe, A. P., Miller, G. H., Richard, P. J., and de Vernal,
A.: Vegetation and climate of the last interglacial on Baffin Island, Arctic
Canada, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 236, 91–106,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Ganopolski and Calov(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Ganopolski, A. and Calov, R.: The role of orbital forcing, carbon dioxide and
regolith in 100 kyr glacial cycles, Clim. Past, 7, 1415–1425,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-1415-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-7-1415-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Ganopolski et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Ganopolski, A., Calov, R., and Claussen, M.: Simulation of the last glacial
cycle with a coupled climate ice-sheet model of intermediate complexity,
Clim. Past, 6, 229–244, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-6-229-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-6-229-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Gardner and Sharp(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Gardner, A. S. and Sharp, M.: Influence of the Arctic circumpolar vortex on the
mass balance of Canadian high Arctic glaciers, J. Climate, 20,
4586–4598, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Ghil(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Ghil, M.: Cryothermodynamics: The chaotic dynamics of paleoclimate, Physica
D, 77, 130–159, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Gildor and Tziperman(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Gildor, H. and Tziperman, E.: Sea ice as the glacial cycles' climate switch:
Role of seasonal and orbital forcing, Paleoceanography, 15, 605–615, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Gildor and Tziperman(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Gildor, H. and Tziperman, E.: A sea ice climate switch mechanism for the
100-kyr glacial cycles, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 106,
9117–9133, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Glisan and Gutowski(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Glisan, J. M. and Gutowski, W. J.: WRF summer extreme daily precipitation over
the CORDEX Arctic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119,
1720–1732, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Glisan et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Glisan, J. M., Gutowski Jr, W. J., Cassano, J. J., and Higgins, M. E.: Effects
of spectral nudging in WRF on Arctic temperature and precipitation
simulations, J. Climate, 26, 3985–3999, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Go{\~{n}}i et~al.(2005)}}?><label>Goñi et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Goñi, M. S., Loutre, M., Crucifix, M., Peyron, O., Santos, L., Duprat, J.,
Malaizé, B., Turon, J.-L., and Peypouquet, J.-P.: Increasing vegetation
and climate gradient in Western Europe over the Last Glacial Inception
(122–110 ka): data-model comparison, Earth  Planet. Sc. Lett.,
231, 111–130, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Goodman and Pierrehumbert(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Goodman, J. C. and Pierrehumbert, R. T.: Glacial flow of floating marine ice in
“Snowball Earth”, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 108,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001471" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JC001471</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Gregory et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Gregory, J. M., Browne, O. J. H., Payne, A. J., Ridley, J. K., and Rutt, I.
C.: Modelling large-scale ice-sheet-climate interactions following glacial
inception, Clim. Past, 8, 1565–1580, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-1565-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-8-1565-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Grell and D{\'{e}}v{\'{e}}nyi(2002)}}?><label>Grell and Dévényi(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Grell, G. A. and Dévényi, D.: A generalized approach to parameterizing
convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 29, 1–38, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Harvey(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Harvey, L. D.: Milankovitch forcing, vegetation feedback, and North Atlantic
deep-water formation, J. Climate, 2, 800–815, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Herrington and Poulsen(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Herrington, A. R. and Poulsen, C. J.: Terminating the Last Interglacial: The
role of ice sheet–climate feedbacks in a GCM asynchronously coupled to an
ice sheet model, J. Climate, 25, 1871–1882, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Hines et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Hines, K. M., Bromwich, D. H., Bai, L.-S., Barlage, M., and Slater, A. G.:
Development and testing of Polar WRF. Part III: Arctic land, J.
Climate, 24, 26–48, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Hong and Lim(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Hong, S.-Y. and Lim, J.-O. J.: The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics
scheme (WSM6), Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 129–151,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Iacono et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A.,
and Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases:
Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD009944</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Ives(1962)</label><mixed-citation>
Ives, J.: Indications of Recent Extensive Glacierization in North-Central
Baffin Island, NWT, J. Glaciol., 4, 197–205, 1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Ives et al.(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
Ives, J. D., Andrews, J. T., and Barry, R. G.: Growth and decay of the
Laurentide Ice Sheet and comparisons with Fenno-Scandinavia,
Naturwissenschaften, 62, 118–125, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Jackson(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, C.: Sensitivity of stationary wave amplitude to regional changes in
Laurentide ice sheet topography in single-layer models of the atmosphere,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 24443–24454, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Jackson and Broccoli(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, C. and Broccoli, A.: Orbital forcing of Arctic climate: mechanisms of
climate response and implications for continental glaciation, Clim.
Dynam., 21, 539–557, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Janjic(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Janjic, Z. I.: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further developments of
the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes, Mon.
Weather Rev., 122, 927–945, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Jochum et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Jochum, M., Jahn, A., Peacock, S., Bailey, D. A., Fasullo, J. T., Kay, J.,
Levis, S., and Otto-Bliesner, B.: True to Milankovitch: glacial inception in
the new Community Climate System Model, J. Climate, 25, 2226–2239,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Kageyama and Valdes(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Kageyama, M. and Valdes, P. J.: Impact of the North American ice-sheet
orography on the Last Glacial Maximum eddies and snowfall, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 27, 1515–1518, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Kageyama et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Kageyama, M., Charbit, S., Ritz, C., Khodri, M., and Ramstein, G.: Quantifying
ice-sheet feedbacks during the last glacial inception, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021339" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL021339</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K{\"{a}}ll{\'{e}}n et~al.(1979)}}?><label>Källén et al.(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
Källén, E., Crafoord, C., and Ghil, M.: Free oscillations in a climate
model with ice-sheet dynamics, J. Atmos. Sci., 36,
2292–2303, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1461?><ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Kaspar et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Kaspar, F., Spangehl, T., and Cubasch, U.: Northern hemisphere winter storm
tracks of the Eemian interglacial and the last glacial inception, Clim. Past,
3, 181–192, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-3-181-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-3-181-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Khodri et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Khodri, M., Leclainche, Y., Ramstein, G., Braconnot, P., Marti, O., and
Cortijo, E.: Simulating the amplification of orbital forcing by ocean
feedbacks in the last glaciation, Nature, 410, 570–574, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kilpel{\"{a}}inen et~al.(2011)}}?><label>Kilpeläinen et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Kilpeläinen, T., Vihma, T., and Ólafsson, H.: Modelling of spatial
variability and topographic effects over Arctic fjords in Svalbard, Tellus A,
63, 223–237, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Kleman et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Kleman, J., Fastook, J., and Stroeven, A. P.: Geologically and
geomorphologically constrained numerical model of Laurentide Ice Sheet
inception and build-up, Quatern. Int., 95, 87–98, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Kleman et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Kleman, J., Fastook, J., Ebert, K., Nilsson, J., and Caballero, R.: Pre-LGM
Northern Hemisphere ice sheet topography, Clim. Past, 9, 2365–2378,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2365-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-9-2365-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Kubatzki et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Kubatzki, C., Claussen, M., Calov, R., and Ganopolski, A.: Sensitivity of the
last glacial inception to initial and surface conditions, Clim. Dynam.,
27, 333–344, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Kurtz and Farrell(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Kurtz, N. T. and Farrell, S. L.: Large-scale surveys of snow depth on Arctic
sea ice from Operation IceBridge, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049216" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL049216</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Lambeck and Chappell(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Lambeck, K. and Chappell, J.: Sea level change through the last glacial cycle,
Science, 292, 679–686, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Lee and North(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, W.-H. and North, G.: Small ice cap instability in the presence of
fluctuations, Clim. Dynam., 11, 242–246, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Lehner et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Lehner, F., Born, A., Raible, C. C., and Stocker, T. F.: Amplified inception of
European Little Ice Age by sea ice–ocean–atmosphere feedbacks, J.
Climate, 26, 7586–7602, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Li et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Li, C., Battisti, D. S., Schrag, D. P., and Tziperman, E.: Abrupt climate
shifts in Greenland due to displacements of the sea ice edge, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 32, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023492" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL023492</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Liakka and Nilsson(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Liakka, J. and Nilsson, J.: The impact of topographically forced stationary
waves on local ice-sheet climate, J. Glaciol., 56, 534–544, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Liakka et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Liakka, J., Nilsson, J., and Löfverström, M.: Interactions between
stationary waves and ice sheets: linear versus nonlinear atmospheric
response, Clim. Dynam., 38, 1249–1262, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{L{\"{o}}fverstr{\"{o}}m et~al.(2014)}}?><label>Löfverström et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Löfverström, M., Caballero, R., Nilsson, J., and Kleman, J.:
Evolution of the large-scale atmospheric circulation in response to changing
ice sheets over the last glacial cycle, Clim. Past, 10, 1453–1471,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1453-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-10-1453-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Marshall and Clarke(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Marshall, S. and Clarke, G.: Ice sheet inception: subgrid hypsometric
parameterization of mass balance in an ice sheet model, Clim. Dynam., 15,
533–550, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Marshall and Clark(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Marshall, S. J. and Clark, P. U.: Basal temperature evolution of North American
ice sheets and implications for the 100-kyr cycle, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 29, 1–67, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Marshall et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Marshall, S. J., Tarasov, L., Clarke, G. K., and Peltier, W. R.: Glaciological
reconstruction of the Laurentide Ice Sheet: physical processes and modelling
challenges, Can. J. Earth Sci., 37, 769–793, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Marshall et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Marshall, S. J., James, T. S., and Clarke, G. K.: North American ice sheet
reconstructions at the Last Glacial Maximum, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 21,
175–192, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Meissner et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Meissner, K., Weaver, A., Matthews, H., and Cox, P.: The role of land surface
dynamics in glacial inception: a study with the UVic Earth System Model,
Clim. Dynam., 21, 515–537, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Milankovitch(1941)</label><mixed-citation>
Milankovitch, M.: Kanon der Erdebestrahlung und seine Anwendung auf das
Eiszeitenproblem, Königlich Serbische Akademie, 1941.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Niu et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Niu, G.-Y., Yang, Z.-L., Mitchell, K. E., Chen, F., Ek, M. B., Barlage, M.,
Kumar, A., Manning, K., Niyogi, D., Rosero, E., Tewari, M., and Youlong, X.: The community Noah
land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model
description and evaluation with local-scale measurements, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD015139</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Oerlemans(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
Oerlemans, J.: Some basic experiments with a vertically-integrated ice sheet
model, Tellus, 33, 1–11, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Oerlemans(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Oerlemans, J.: On glacial inception and orography, Quatern. Int.,
95, 5–10, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Otieno and Bromwich(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Otieno, F. O. and Bromwich, D. H.: Contribution of Atmospheric Circulation to
Inception of the Laurentide Ice Sheet at 116 kyr BP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Climate, 22,
39–57, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Otieno et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Otieno, F. O., Bromwich, D. H., and Oglesby, R.: Atmospheric circulation
anomalies due to 115 kyr BP climate forcing dominated by changes in the North
Pacific Ocean, Clim. Dynam., 38, 815–835, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Otterman et al.(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Otterman, J., Chou, M., and Arking, A.: Effects of nontropical forest cover on
climate, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 23, 762–767, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Petit et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Petit, J.-R., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Barkov, N. I., Barnola, J.-M., Basile,
I., Bender, M., Chappellaz, J., Davis, M., Delaygue, G., Kotlyakov, V. M., Legrand, M., Lipenkov, V. Y., Lorius, C., Pepin, L., Ritz, C., Saltzman, E., and Stievenard, M.: Climate and
atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core,
Antarctica, Nature, 399, 429–436, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Porter et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Porter, D. F., Cassano, J. J., and Serreze, M. C.: Local and large-scale
atmospheric responses to reduced Arctic sea ice and ocean warming in the WRF
model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D11115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016969" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016969</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Rind et al.(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Rind, D., Peteet, D., and Kukla, G.: Can Milankovitch orbital variations
initiate the growth of ice sheets in a general circulation model?, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 94, 12851–12871, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Roe and Lindzen(2001{\natexlab{a}})}}?><label>Roe and Lindzen(2001a)</label><mixed-citation>
Roe, G. and Lindzen, R.: A one-dimensional model for the interaction between
continental-scale ice sheets and atmospheric stationary waves, Clim.
Dynam., 17, 479–487, 2001a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Roe and Lindzen(2001{\natexlab{b}})}}?><label>Roe and Lindzen(2001b)</label><mixed-citation>
Roe, G. H. and Lindzen, R. S.: The mutual interaction between continental-scale
ice sheets and atmospheric stationary waves, J. Climate, 14,
1450–1465, 2001b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Ruddiman et al.(1980)</label><mixed-citation>
Ruddiman, W., McIntyre, A., Niebler-Hunt, V., and Durazzi, J.: Oceanic evidence
for the mechanism of rapid northern hemisphere glaciation, Quaternary
Res., 13, 33–64, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Screen and Simmonds(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Screen, J. A. and Simmonds, I.: Erroneous Arctic temperature trends in the
ERA-40 reanalysis: A closer look, J. Climate, 24, 2620–2627, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Skamarock et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Skamarock, W., Klemp, J., Dudhia, J., Gill, D., Barker, D., Duda, M., Huang,
X., Wang, W., and Powers, J.: A description of the Advanced Research 488 WRF
Version 3, Tech. rep., NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-475+STR, 489, 113 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D68S4MVH" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D68S4MVH</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Smith(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, R.: The influence of the earth's rotation on mountain wave drag, J.
Atmos. Sci., 36, 177–180, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1462?><ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Stokes(1955)</label><mixed-citation>
Stokes, W. L.: Another look at the ice age, Science, 122, 815–821, 1955.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Van den Berg et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Van den Berg, J., Van de Wal, R., and Oerlemans, J.: Effects of spatial
discretization in ice-sheet modelling using the shallow-ice approximation,
J. Glaciol., 52, 89–98, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Vavrus et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Vavrus, S., Philippon-Berthier, G., Kutzbach, J. E., and Ruddiman, W. F.: The
role of GCM resolution in simulating glacial inception,   Holocene, 21,
819–830, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Vettoretti and Peltier(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Vettoretti, G. and Peltier, W.: Post-Eemian glacial inception. Part II:
Elements of a cryospheric moisture pump, J. Climate, 16, 912–927,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Vettoretti and Peltier(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Vettoretti, G. and Peltier, W.: Sensitivity of glacial inception to orbital and
greenhouse gas climate forcing, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 23, 499–519,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>Vimeux et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Vimeux, F., Masson, V., Jouzel, J., Stievenard, M., and Petit, J.:
Glacial–interglacial changes in ocean surface conditions in the Southern
Hemisphere, Nature, 398, 410–413, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><label>Waelbroeck et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Waelbroeck, C., Labeyrie, L., Michel, E., Duplessy, J. C., McManus, J.,
Lambeck, K., Balbon, E., and Labracherie, M.: Sea-level and deep water
temperature changes derived from benthic foraminifera isotopic records,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 21, 295–305, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><label>Wang and Mysak(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z. and Mysak, L. A.: Simulation of the last glacial inception and rapid
ice sheet growth in the McGill Paleoclimate Model, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015120" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL015120</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><label>Wang et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z., Cochelin, A.-S. B., Mysak, L. A., and Wang, Y.: Simulation of the
last glacial inception with the green McGill Paleoclimate Model, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 32, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL023047</ext-link>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><label>Weertman(1957)</label><mixed-citation>
Weertman, J.: Deformation of floating ice shelves, J. Glaciol., 3,
38–42, 1957.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><label>Wells(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
Wells, G. L.: Late-glacial circulation over central North America revealed by
aeolian features, in: Variations in the global water budget,
Springer, 317–330, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><label>Williams(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, L. D.: An energy balance model of potential glacierization of
northern Canada, Arctic   Alpin. Res., 11,  443–456, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><label>Yang et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, Z.-L., Dickinson, R., Henderson-Sellers, A., and Pitman, A.: Preliminary
study of spin-up processes in land surface models with the first stage data
of Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes Phase
1 (a), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 16553–16578,
1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx104"><label>Yin and Battisti(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Yin, J. H. and Battisti, D. S.: The importance of tropical sea surface
temperature patterns in simulations of Last Glacial Maximum climate, J. Climate, 14, 565–581, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx105"><label>Yoshimori et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Yoshimori, M., Reader, M., Weaver, A., and McFarlane, N.: On the causes of
glacial inception at 116 kaBP, Clim. Dynam., 18, 383–402, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx106"><label>Zdanowicz et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Zdanowicz, C., Smetny-Sowa, A., Fisher, D., Schaffer, N., Copland, L., Eley,
J., and Dupont, F.: Summer melt rates on Penny Ice Cap, Baffin Island: Past
and recent trends and implications for regional climate, J.
Geophys. Res.-Earth, 117, F02006, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002248" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JF002248</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The role of regional feedbacks in glacial inception on Baffin Island: the interaction of ice flow and meteorology</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Over the past 0.8 million years, 100&thinsp;kyr ice ages have dominated
Earth's climate with geological evidence suggesting the last glacial
inception began in the mountains of Baffin Island. Currently,
state-of-the-art global climate models (GCMs) have difficulty simulating
glacial inception, possibly due in part to their coarse horizontal resolution
and the neglect of ice flow dynamics in some models. We attempt to address
the role of regional feedbacks in the initial inception problem on Baffin
Island by asynchronously coupling the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model,
configured as a high-resolution inner domain over Baffin and an outer
domain incorporating much of North America, to an ice flow model using the
shallow ice approximation. The mass balance is calculated from WRF
simulations and used to drive the ice model, which updates the ice extent
and elevation, that then serve as inputs to the next WRF run. We drive the
regional WRF configuration using atmospheric boundary conditions from 1986
that correspond to a relatively cold summer, and with 115&thinsp;kya insolation.
Initially, ice accumulates on mountain glaciers, driving downslope ice flow
which expands the size of the ice caps. However, continued iterations of the
atmosphere and ice models reveal a stagnation of the ice sheet on Baffin
Island, driven by melting due to warmer temperatures at the margins of the
ice caps. This warming is caused by changes in the regional circulation that
are forced by elevation changes due to the ice growth. A stabilizing feedback
between ice elevation and atmospheric circulation thus prevents full
inception from occurring.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Abe-Ouchi et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Abe-Ouchi, A., Segawa, T., and Saito, F.: Climatic Conditions for modelling
the Northern Hemisphere ice sheets throughout the ice age cycle, Clim. Past,
3, 423–438, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-3-423-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-3-423-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Abe-Ouchi et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Abe-Ouchi, A., Saito, F., Kawamura, K., Raymo, M. E., Okuno, J., Takahashi, K.,
and Blatter, H.: Insolation-driven 100,000-year glacial cycles and hysteresis
of ice-sheet volume, Nature, 500, 190–193, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Andrews and Barry(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
Andrews, J. and Barry, R.: Glacial inception and disintegration during the last
glaciation, Ann. Rev. Earth  Pl. Sc., 6, 205–228, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Andrews and Mahaffy(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
Andrews, J. and Mahaffy, M.: Growth rate of the Laurentide Ice Sheet and sea
level lowering (with emphasis on the 115,000 BP sea level low), Quaternary
Res., 6, 167–183, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Andrews and Miller(1972)</label><mixed-citation>
Andrews, J. and Miller, G.: Quarternary history of northern Cumberland
peninsula, Baffin Island, NWT, Canada: Part IV: Maps of the present
glaciation limits and lowest equilibrium line altitude for north and south
Baffin Island, Arctic and Alpine Research,   45–59, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Beghin et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Beghin, P., Charbit, S., Dumas, C., Kageyama, M., Roche, D. M., and Ritz, C.:
Interdependence of the growth of the Northern Hemisphere ice sheets during
the last glaciation: the role of atmospheric circulation, Clim. Past, 10,
345–358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-345-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-345-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Birch et al.(2017)Birch, Cronin, and Tziperman</label><mixed-citation>
Birch, L., Cronin, T., and Tziperman, E.: Glacial Inception on Baffin Island:
The Role of Insolation, Meteorology, and Topography, J. Climate, 30,
4047–4064, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Bonelli et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Bonelli, S., Charbit, S., Kageyama, M., Woillez, M.-N., Ramstein, G., Dumas,
C., and Quiquet, A.: Investigating the evolution of major Northern Hemisphere
ice sheets during the last glacial-interglacial cycle, Clim. Past, 5,
329–345, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-5-329-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-5-329-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Bromwich et al.(2002a)</label><mixed-citation>
Bromwich, D. H., Toracinta, E. R., and Wang, S.-H.: Meteorological perspective
on the initiation of the Laurentide Ice Sheet, Quatern. Int., 95,
113–124, 2002a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Bromwich et al.(2002b)</label><mixed-citation>
Bromwich, D. H., Wang, S.-H., and Monaghan, A. J.: ERA-40 representation of the
Arctic atmospheric moisture budget, in: ECMWF Workshop on Reanalysis, ECMWF
Re-Analysis Proj. Rep. Ser,  Citeseer, 3,  287–298,
2002b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Bromwich et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Bromwich, D. H., Toracinta, E. R., Oglesby, R. J., Fastook, J. L., and Hughes,
T. J.: LGM summer climate on the southern margin of the Laurentide Ice Sheet:
wet or dry?, J. Climate, 18, 3317–3338, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Calov et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Calov, R., Ganopolski, A., Petoukhov, V., Claussen, M., Brovkin, V., and
Kubatzki, C.: Transient simulation of the last glacial inception. Part II:
sensitivity and feedback analysis, Clim. Dynam., 24, 563–576, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Cassano et al.(2011)Cassano, Higgins, and
Seefeldt</label><mixed-citation>
Cassano, J. J., Higgins, M. E., and Seefeldt, M. W.: Performance of the Weather
Research and Forecasting model for month-long pan-Arctic simulations, Mon.
Weather Rev., 139, 3469–3488, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Chen and Lin(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, S.-H. and Lin, Y.-L.: Orographic effects on a conditionally unstable flow
over an idealized three-dimensional mesoscale mountain, Meteorol.
Atmos. Phys., 88, 1–21, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Clark et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, P., Clague, J., Curry, B. B., Dreimanis, A., Hicock, S., Miller, G.,
Berger, G., Eyles, N., Lamothe, M., Miller, B., Mott, R. J., Oldale R. N., Stea, R. R., Szabo, J. P., Thorleifson, L. H., and Vincent, J. S.: Initiation and
development of the Laurentide and Cordilleran ice sheets following the last
interglaciation, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 12, 79–114, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Cook and Held(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, K. H. and Held, I. M.: Stationary waves of the ice age climate, J.
Climate, 1, 807–819, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Cortijo et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Cortijo, E., Duplessy, J., Labeyrie, L., Leclaire, H., Duprat, J., and
Van Wearing, T.: Eemian cooling in the Norwegian Sea and North Atlantic ocean
preceding continental ice-sheet growth, Nature, 372, 446–449, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Cosgrove et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Cosgrove, B. A., Lohmann, D., Mitchell, K. E., Houser, P. R., Wood, E. F.,
Schaake, J. C., Robock, A., Sheffield, J., Duan, Q., Luo, L., Wayne Higgins, R., Pinker, R. T., and Tarpley, J. D.: Land
surface model spin-up behavior in the North American Land Data Assimilation
System (NLDAS), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108,   <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003316" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003316</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Creveling et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Creveling, J. R., Mitrovica, J. X., Clark, P. U., Waelbroeck, C., and Pico, T.:
Predicted bounds on peak global mean sea level during marine isotope stages
5a and 5c, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 163, 193–208, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Cuffey and Paterson(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Cuffey, K. M. and Paterson, W. S. B.: The physics of glaciers, Academic Press,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Dee et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi,
S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P.,
Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C.,
Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B.,
Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M.,
Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park,
B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and Vitart,
F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data
assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
137, 553–597, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Denis et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Denis, B., Laprise, R., Caya, D., and Côté, J.: Downscaling ability of
one-way nested regional climate models: the Big-Brother Experiment, Clim.
Dynam., 18, 627–646, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>de Noblet et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
de Noblet, N. I., Prentice, I. C., Joussaume, S., Texier, D., Botta, A., and
Haxeltine, A.: Possible role of atmosphere-biosphere interactions in
triggering the Last Glaciation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 3191–3194,
1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Deser et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Deser, C., Phillips, A. S., Alexander, M. A., and Smoliak, B. V.: Projecting
North American climate over the next 50 years: Uncertainty due to internal
variability, J. Climate, 27, 2271–2296, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Dong and Valdes(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Dong, B. and Valdes, P. J.: Sensitivity studies of Northern Hemisphere
glaciation using an atmospheric general circulation model, J.
Climate, 8, 2471–2496, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Drusch et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Drusch, M., Vasiljevic, D., and Viterbo, P.: ECMWF's global snow analysis:
Assessment and revision based on satellite observations, J. Appl.
Meteorol., 43, 1282–1294, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Dutra et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Dutra, E., Balsamo, G., Viterbo, P., Miranda, P. M., Beljaars, A., Schär,
C., and Elder, K.: An improved snow scheme for the ECMWF land surface model:
Description and offline validation, J. Hydrometeorol., 11,
899–916, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Farrell and Abbot(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Farrell, B. F. and Abbot, D. S.: A mechanism for dust-induced destabilization
of glacial climates, Clim. Past, 8, 2061–2067,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-2061-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-2061-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Fréchette et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Fréchette, B., Wolfe, A. P., Miller, G. H., Richard, P. J., and de Vernal,
A.: Vegetation and climate of the last interglacial on Baffin Island, Arctic
Canada, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 236, 91–106,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Ganopolski and Calov(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Ganopolski, A. and Calov, R.: The role of orbital forcing, carbon dioxide and
regolith in 100&thinsp;kyr glacial cycles, Clim. Past, 7, 1415–1425,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-1415-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-1415-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Ganopolski et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Ganopolski, A., Calov, R., and Claussen, M.: Simulation of the last glacial
cycle with a coupled climate ice-sheet model of intermediate complexity,
Clim. Past, 6, 229–244, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-6-229-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-6-229-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Gardner and Sharp(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Gardner, A. S. and Sharp, M.: Influence of the Arctic circumpolar vortex on the
mass balance of Canadian high Arctic glaciers, J. Climate, 20,
4586–4598, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Ghil(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Ghil, M.: Cryothermodynamics: The chaotic dynamics of paleoclimate, Physica
D, 77, 130–159, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Gildor and Tziperman(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Gildor, H. and Tziperman, E.: Sea ice as the glacial cycles' climate switch:
Role of seasonal and orbital forcing, Paleoceanography, 15, 605–615, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Gildor and Tziperman(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Gildor, H. and Tziperman, E.: A sea ice climate switch mechanism for the
100-kyr glacial cycles, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 106,
9117–9133, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Glisan and Gutowski(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Glisan, J. M. and Gutowski, W. J.: WRF summer extreme daily precipitation over
the CORDEX Arctic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119,
1720–1732, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Glisan et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Glisan, J. M., Gutowski Jr, W. J., Cassano, J. J., and Higgins, M. E.: Effects
of spectral nudging in WRF on Arctic temperature and precipitation
simulations, J. Climate, 26, 3985–3999, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Goñi et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Goñi, M. S., Loutre, M., Crucifix, M., Peyron, O., Santos, L., Duprat, J.,
Malaizé, B., Turon, J.-L., and Peypouquet, J.-P.: Increasing vegetation
and climate gradient in Western Europe over the Last Glacial Inception
(122–110 ka): data-model comparison, Earth  Planet. Sc. Lett.,
231, 111–130, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Goodman and Pierrehumbert(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Goodman, J. C. and Pierrehumbert, R. T.: Glacial flow of floating marine ice in
“Snowball Earth”, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 108,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001471" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001471</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Gregory et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Gregory, J. M., Browne, O. J. H., Payne, A. J., Ridley, J. K., and Rutt, I.
C.: Modelling large-scale ice-sheet-climate interactions following glacial
inception, Clim. Past, 8, 1565–1580, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-1565-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-1565-2012</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Grell and Dévényi(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Grell, G. A. and Dévényi, D.: A generalized approach to parameterizing
convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 29, 1–38, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Harvey(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Harvey, L. D.: Milankovitch forcing, vegetation feedback, and North Atlantic
deep-water formation, J. Climate, 2, 800–815, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Herrington and Poulsen(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Herrington, A. R. and Poulsen, C. J.: Terminating the Last Interglacial: The
role of ice sheet–climate feedbacks in a GCM asynchronously coupled to an
ice sheet model, J. Climate, 25, 1871–1882, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Hines et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Hines, K. M., Bromwich, D. H., Bai, L.-S., Barlage, M., and Slater, A. G.:
Development and testing of Polar WRF. Part III: Arctic land, J.
Climate, 24, 26–48, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Hong and Lim(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Hong, S.-Y. and Lim, J.-O. J.: The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics
scheme (WSM6), Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 129–151,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Iacono et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A.,
and Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases:
Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Ives(1962)</label><mixed-citation>
Ives, J.: Indications of Recent Extensive Glacierization in North-Central
Baffin Island, NWT, J. Glaciol., 4, 197–205, 1962.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Ives et al.(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
Ives, J. D., Andrews, J. T., and Barry, R. G.: Growth and decay of the
Laurentide Ice Sheet and comparisons with Fenno-Scandinavia,
Naturwissenschaften, 62, 118–125, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Jackson(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, C.: Sensitivity of stationary wave amplitude to regional changes in
Laurentide ice sheet topography in single-layer models of the atmosphere,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 24443–24454, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Jackson and Broccoli(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, C. and Broccoli, A.: Orbital forcing of Arctic climate: mechanisms of
climate response and implications for continental glaciation, Clim.
Dynam., 21, 539–557, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Janjic(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Janjic, Z. I.: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further developments of
the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes, Mon.
Weather Rev., 122, 927–945, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Jochum et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Jochum, M., Jahn, A., Peacock, S., Bailey, D. A., Fasullo, J. T., Kay, J.,
Levis, S., and Otto-Bliesner, B.: True to Milankovitch: glacial inception in
the new Community Climate System Model, J. Climate, 25, 2226–2239,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Kageyama and Valdes(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Kageyama, M. and Valdes, P. J.: Impact of the North American ice-sheet
orography on the Last Glacial Maximum eddies and snowfall, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 27, 1515–1518, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Kageyama et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Kageyama, M., Charbit, S., Ritz, C., Khodri, M., and Ramstein, G.: Quantifying
ice-sheet feedbacks during the last glacial inception, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 31, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021339" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021339</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Källén et al.(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
Källén, E., Crafoord, C., and Ghil, M.: Free oscillations in a climate
model with ice-sheet dynamics, J. Atmos. Sci., 36,
2292–2303, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Kaspar et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Kaspar, F., Spangehl, T., and Cubasch, U.: Northern hemisphere winter storm
tracks of the Eemian interglacial and the last glacial inception, Clim. Past,
3, 181–192, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-3-181-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-3-181-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Khodri et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Khodri, M., Leclainche, Y., Ramstein, G., Braconnot, P., Marti, O., and
Cortijo, E.: Simulating the amplification of orbital forcing by ocean
feedbacks in the last glaciation, Nature, 410, 570–574, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Kilpeläinen et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Kilpeläinen, T., Vihma, T., and Ólafsson, H.: Modelling of spatial
variability and topographic effects over Arctic fjords in Svalbard, Tellus A,
63, 223–237, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Kleman et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Kleman, J., Fastook, J., and Stroeven, A. P.: Geologically and
geomorphologically constrained numerical model of Laurentide Ice Sheet
inception and build-up, Quatern. Int., 95, 87–98, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Kleman et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Kleman, J., Fastook, J., Ebert, K., Nilsson, J., and Caballero, R.: Pre-LGM
Northern Hemisphere ice sheet topography, Clim. Past, 9, 2365–2378,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2365-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2365-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Kubatzki et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Kubatzki, C., Claussen, M., Calov, R., and Ganopolski, A.: Sensitivity of the
last glacial inception to initial and surface conditions, Clim. Dynam.,
27, 333–344, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Kurtz and Farrell(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Kurtz, N. T. and Farrell, S. L.: Large-scale surveys of snow depth on Arctic
sea ice from Operation IceBridge, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049216" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049216</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Lambeck and Chappell(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Lambeck, K. and Chappell, J.: Sea level change through the last glacial cycle,
Science, 292, 679–686, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Lee and North(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, W.-H. and North, G.: Small ice cap instability in the presence of
fluctuations, Clim. Dynam., 11, 242–246, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Lehner et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Lehner, F., Born, A., Raible, C. C., and Stocker, T. F.: Amplified inception of
European Little Ice Age by sea ice–ocean–atmosphere feedbacks, J.
Climate, 26, 7586–7602, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Li et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., Battisti, D. S., Schrag, D. P., and Tziperman, E.: Abrupt climate
shifts in Greenland due to displacements of the sea ice edge, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 32, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023492" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023492</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Liakka and Nilsson(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Liakka, J. and Nilsson, J.: The impact of topographically forced stationary
waves on local ice-sheet climate, J. Glaciol., 56, 534–544, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Liakka et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Liakka, J., Nilsson, J., and Löfverström, M.: Interactions between
stationary waves and ice sheets: linear versus nonlinear atmospheric
response, Clim. Dynam., 38, 1249–1262, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Löfverström et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Löfverström, M., Caballero, R., Nilsson, J., and Kleman, J.:
Evolution of the large-scale atmospheric circulation in response to changing
ice sheets over the last glacial cycle, Clim. Past, 10, 1453–1471,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1453-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1453-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Marshall and Clarke(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Marshall, S. and Clarke, G.: Ice sheet inception: subgrid hypsometric
parameterization of mass balance in an ice sheet model, Clim. Dynam., 15,
533–550, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Marshall and Clark(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Marshall, S. J. and Clark, P. U.: Basal temperature evolution of North American
ice sheets and implications for the 100-kyr cycle, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 29, 1–67, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Marshall et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Marshall, S. J., Tarasov, L., Clarke, G. K., and Peltier, W. R.: Glaciological
reconstruction of the Laurentide Ice Sheet: physical processes and modelling
challenges, Can. J. Earth Sci., 37, 769–793, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Marshall et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Marshall, S. J., James, T. S., and Clarke, G. K.: North American ice sheet
reconstructions at the Last Glacial Maximum, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 21,
175–192, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Meissner et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Meissner, K., Weaver, A., Matthews, H., and Cox, P.: The role of land surface
dynamics in glacial inception: a study with the UVic Earth System Model,
Clim. Dynam., 21, 515–537, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Milankovitch(1941)</label><mixed-citation>
Milankovitch, M.: Kanon der Erdebestrahlung und seine Anwendung auf das
Eiszeitenproblem, Königlich Serbische Akademie, 1941.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Niu et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Niu, G.-Y., Yang, Z.-L., Mitchell, K. E., Chen, F., Ek, M. B., Barlage, M.,
Kumar, A., Manning, K., Niyogi, D., Rosero, E., Tewari, M., and Youlong, X.: The community Noah
land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model
description and evaluation with local-scale measurements, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Oerlemans(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
Oerlemans, J.: Some basic experiments with a vertically-integrated ice sheet
model, Tellus, 33, 1–11, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Oerlemans(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Oerlemans, J.: On glacial inception and orography, Quatern. Int.,
95, 5–10, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Otieno and Bromwich(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Otieno, F. O. and Bromwich, D. H.: Contribution of Atmospheric Circulation to
Inception of the Laurentide Ice Sheet at 116 kyr BP*, J. Climate, 22,
39–57, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Otieno et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Otieno, F. O., Bromwich, D. H., and Oglesby, R.: Atmospheric circulation
anomalies due to 115 kyr BP climate forcing dominated by changes in the North
Pacific Ocean, Clim. Dynam., 38, 815–835, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Otterman et al.(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Otterman, J., Chou, M., and Arking, A.: Effects of nontropical forest cover on
climate, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 23, 762–767, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Petit et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Petit, J.-R., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Barkov, N. I., Barnola, J.-M., Basile,
I., Bender, M., Chappellaz, J., Davis, M., Delaygue, G., Kotlyakov, V. M., Legrand, M., Lipenkov, V. Y., Lorius, C., Pepin, L., Ritz, C., Saltzman, E., and Stievenard, M.: Climate and
atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core,
Antarctica, Nature, 399, 429–436, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Porter et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Porter, D. F., Cassano, J. J., and Serreze, M. C.: Local and large-scale
atmospheric responses to reduced Arctic sea ice and ocean warming in the WRF
model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D11115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016969" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016969</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Rind et al.(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Rind, D., Peteet, D., and Kukla, G.: Can Milankovitch orbital variations
initiate the growth of ice sheets in a general circulation model?, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 94, 12851–12871, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Roe and Lindzen(2001a)</label><mixed-citation>
Roe, G. and Lindzen, R.: A one-dimensional model for the interaction between
continental-scale ice sheets and atmospheric stationary waves, Clim.
Dynam., 17, 479–487, 2001a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Roe and Lindzen(2001b)</label><mixed-citation>
Roe, G. H. and Lindzen, R. S.: The mutual interaction between continental-scale
ice sheets and atmospheric stationary waves, J. Climate, 14,
1450–1465, 2001b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Ruddiman et al.(1980)</label><mixed-citation>
Ruddiman, W., McIntyre, A., Niebler-Hunt, V., and Durazzi, J.: Oceanic evidence
for the mechanism of rapid northern hemisphere glaciation, Quaternary
Res., 13, 33–64, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Screen and Simmonds(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Screen, J. A. and Simmonds, I.: Erroneous Arctic temperature trends in the
ERA-40 reanalysis: A closer look, J. Climate, 24, 2620–2627, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Skamarock et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Skamarock, W., Klemp, J., Dudhia, J., Gill, D., Barker, D., Duda, M., Huang,
X., Wang, W., and Powers, J.: A description of the Advanced Research 488 WRF
Version 3, Tech. rep., NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-475+STR, 489, 113 pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D68S4MVH" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D68S4MVH</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Smith(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, R.: The influence of the earth's rotation on mountain wave drag, J.
Atmos. Sci., 36, 177–180, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Stokes(1955)</label><mixed-citation>
Stokes, W. L.: Another look at the ice age, Science, 122, 815–821, 1955.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Van den Berg et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Van den Berg, J., Van de Wal, R., and Oerlemans, J.: Effects of spatial
discretization in ice-sheet modelling using the shallow-ice approximation,
J. Glaciol., 52, 89–98, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Vavrus et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Vavrus, S., Philippon-Berthier, G., Kutzbach, J. E., and Ruddiman, W. F.: The
role of GCM resolution in simulating glacial inception,   Holocene, 21,
819–830, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Vettoretti and Peltier(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Vettoretti, G. and Peltier, W.: Post-Eemian glacial inception. Part II:
Elements of a cryospheric moisture pump, J. Climate, 16, 912–927,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Vettoretti and Peltier(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Vettoretti, G. and Peltier, W.: Sensitivity of glacial inception to orbital and
greenhouse gas climate forcing, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 23, 499–519,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>Vimeux et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Vimeux, F., Masson, V., Jouzel, J., Stievenard, M., and Petit, J.:
Glacial–interglacial changes in ocean surface conditions in the Southern
Hemisphere, Nature, 398, 410–413, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Waelbroeck et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Waelbroeck, C., Labeyrie, L., Michel, E., Duplessy, J. C., McManus, J.,
Lambeck, K., Balbon, E., and Labracherie, M.: Sea-level and deep water
temperature changes derived from benthic foraminifera isotopic records,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 21, 295–305, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Wang and Mysak(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Z. and Mysak, L. A.: Simulation of the last glacial inception and rapid
ice sheet growth in the McGill Paleoclimate Model, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 29, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015120" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015120</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>Wang et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Z., Cochelin, A.-S. B., Mysak, L. A., and Wang, Y.: Simulation of the
last glacial inception with the green McGill Paleoclimate Model, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 32, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023047</a>, 2005.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>Weertman(1957)</label><mixed-citation>
Weertman, J.: Deformation of floating ice shelves, J. Glaciol., 3,
38–42, 1957.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>Wells(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
Wells, G. L.: Late-glacial circulation over central North America revealed by
aeolian features, in: Variations in the global water budget,
Springer, 317–330, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>Williams(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, L. D.: An energy balance model of potential glacierization of
northern Canada, Arctic   Alpin. Res., 11,  443–456, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>Yang et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, Z.-L., Dickinson, R., Henderson-Sellers, A., and Pitman, A.: Preliminary
study of spin-up processes in land surface models with the first stage data
of Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes Phase
1 (a), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 16553–16578,
1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>Yin and Battisti(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Yin, J. H. and Battisti, D. S.: The importance of tropical sea surface
temperature patterns in simulations of Last Glacial Maximum climate, J. Climate, 14, 565–581, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>Yoshimori et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Yoshimori, M., Reader, M., Weaver, A., and McFarlane, N.: On the causes of
glacial inception at 116 kaBP, Clim. Dynam., 18, 383–402, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>Zdanowicz et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Zdanowicz, C., Smetny-Sowa, A., Fisher, D., Schaffer, N., Copland, L., Eley,
J., and Dupont, F.: Summer melt rates on Penny Ice Cap, Baffin Island: Past
and recent trends and implications for regional climate, J.
Geophys. Res.-Earth, 117, F02006, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002248" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002248</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
