<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">CP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Climate of the Past</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">CP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Clim. Past</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1814-9332</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/cp-12-943-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>The Last Glacial Maximum in the central North Island, New Zealand: palaeoclimate inferences from glacier modelling</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{The Last Glacial Maximum in the central North Island}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S.~R.~Eaves et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Eaves</surname><given-names>Shaun R.</given-names></name>
          <email>shaun.eaves@vuw.ac.nz</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Mackintosh</surname><given-names>Andrew N.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Anderson</surname><given-names>Brian M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Doughty</surname><given-names>Alice M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Townsend</surname><given-names>Dougal B.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Conway</surname><given-names>Chris E.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Winckler</surname><given-names>Gisela</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Schaefer</surname><given-names>Joerg M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6358-7115</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Leonard</surname><given-names>Graham S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Calvert</surname><given-names>Andrew T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Antarctic Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>School of Geography, Earth, and Environmental Science, Victoria University of Wellington, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>P.O. Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Earth Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>GNS Science, 1 Fairway Drive, Avalon, P.O. Box 30-368, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University of New York, Palisades, NY 10964, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Volcano Science Center, US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Shaun R. Eaves (shaun.eaves@vuw.ac.nz)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>15</day><month>April</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>943</fpage><lpage>960</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>4</day><month>January</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>18</day><month>January</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>31</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/12/943/2016/cp-12-943-2016.html">This article is available from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/12/943/2016/cp-12-943-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/12/943/2016/cp-12-943-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/12/943/2016/cp-12-943-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Quantitative palaeoclimate reconstructions provide data for evaluating the
mechanisms of past, natural climate variability. Geometries of former
mountain glaciers, constrained by moraine mapping, afford the opportunity to
reconstruct palaeoclimate, due to the close relationship between ice extent
and local climate. In this study, we present results from a series of
experiments using a 2-D coupled energy balance–ice flow model that investigate
the palaeoclimate significance of Last Glacial Maximum moraines within nine
catchments in the central North Island, New Zealand. We find that the former ice
limits can be simulated when present-day temperatures are reduced by between
4 and 7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, if
precipitation remains unchanged from
present. The spread in the results between the nine catchments is likely to
represent the combination of chronological and model uncertainties. The
majority of catchments targeted require temperature decreases of 5.1 to 6.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to simulate the former glaciers, which represents
our best estimate of the temperature anomaly in the central North Island, New
Zealand, during the Last Glacial Maximum. A decrease in precipitation of up to
25 % from present, as suggested by proxy evidence and climate models,
increases the magnitude of the required temperature changes by up to 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Glacier model experiments using reconstructed topographies that
exclude the volume of post-glacial (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 ka) volcanism generally increased
the magnitude of cooling required to simulate the former ice limits by up to
0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Our palaeotemperature estimates expand the spatial coverage of
proxy-based quantitative palaeoclimate reconstructions in New Zealand. Our
results are also consistent with independent, proximal temperature
reconstructions from fossil groundwater and pollen assemblages, as well as
similar glacier modelling reconstructions from the central Southern Alps, which
suggest air temperatures were ca. 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C lower than present across New
Zealand during the Last Glacial Maximum.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) describes the global sea level low stand at
26–19 ka, when global ice sheets attained their maximum volume of the last
glacial cycle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.1"/>. This signal is dominated by the former
Northern Hemisphere ice sheets; however, ice extent also peaked globally
during this interval <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.2"/>. Atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
was markedly lower than present during the LGM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.3"/>;
therefore, this multi-millennial interval represents an important target for
understanding the quasi-equilibrium response of the global climate system to
a large (ca. 100 ppmv) radiative forcing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.4"/>. Well-distributed, quantitative estimates of LGM air
temperature, derived from climate proxy data, provide important data for
constraining estimates of climate sensitivity and evaluating climate model
simulations that seek to determine the drivers and mechanisms of past climate
change.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Present-day ice distribution (black polygons) and previous
reconstructions of the Last Glacial Cold Period ice masses
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="altparen.5"/> – blue polygon; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="altparen.6"/> – black
dashed line) on the central North Island volcanoes: Tongariro massif and Mt Ruapehu. Red lines denote LGM ice limits targeted in Experiments 2 and 3 of
this study, for the following valleys listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. Inset
map shows location of Tongariro Volcanic Centre in the central North Island, New
Zealand.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/12/943/2016/cp-12-943-2016-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Topography, with 200 m contours and selected landmarks referred
to in the text (Land Information New Zealand – LINZ). LGM glacial limits targeted
in model simulations (from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>) are shown. <bold>(b)</bold> Mean annual
precipitation surface <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="paren.7"/>. Precipitation isolines are shown in
500 mm intervals. <bold>(c)</bold> Mean annual temperature derived using the methods
outlined in the text with the lapse rates of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.8"/>. Isotherms are
shown at intervals of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The symbols in panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold> mark the
landmarks labelled in panel <bold>(a)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/12/943/2016/cp-12-943-2016-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Reconstructions of glacial climate in the southern mid-latitudes offer
insight into natural shifts in atmospheric and oceanic circulation systems
without the complex feedbacks associated with the growth and decay of large
continental ice masses. However, few locations in the Southern Hemisphere
afford proxy-based reconstructions of terrestrial palaeoclimate. In New
Zealand, local nomenclature such as “extended LGM” <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.9"/>
or, more recently, “Last Glacial Cold Period” (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx7" id="altparen.10"/>) has been introduced to describe the glacial climatic
conditions that prevailed ca. 30–18 ka (e.g.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101 bib1.bibx78" id="altparen.11"/>). Continuous and well-dated
climate proxy records have greatly improved understanding of the timing and
relative magnitudes of climatic changes in New Zealand through this period
(e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="altparen.12"/>). However, quantitative estimates of
terrestrial palaeoclimatic variables (namely air temperature and
precipitation) are rare. Where available, independent estimates of LGM
climate have shown good agreement across relatively short spatial scales
(e.g. central Southern Alps – <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx84" id="altparen.13"/>). However, quantitative
palaeoclimate reconstructions from elsewhere in New Zealand can differ
greatly. For example, McKinnon et al. (2012; their Table 3) summarise all
previously published, terrestrial, LGM temperature estimates for New Zealand,
which range from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, relative to present. Such
differences may arise from methodological and/or chronological uncertainties,
or could represent meaningful spatial relationships that represent key
climatic processes (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="altparen.14"/>) related to the drivers of
change. Estimates of precipitation changes during the LGM are even more
scarce, and often qualitative <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102" id="paren.15"/>. Increasing the number
and spatial coverage of quantitative palaeoclimate reconstructions will help
to resolve these issues.</p>
      <p>In the central North Island, New Zealand, geological evidence, primarily in the
form of moraines, suggests that small ice fields or ice caps existed on the
Ruapehu and Tongariro volcanoes during the late Quaternary <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.16"/>. Geometric reconstructions
of these ice masses suggest that local equilibrium line altitudes (ELAs) were
depressed by ca. 1000 m relative to present <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.17"/>. However, these manual glacial reconstructions are hampered by
the paucity of geomorphic evidence to constrain past ice thickness on the
upper mountain, which can lead to errors in palaeo-ELA estimates
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.18"/>. Furthermore, localised topographic changes resulting from
effusive post-glacial volcanism <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.19"/>, as well
as post-glacial flank collapse <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.20"/>, also
contribute uncertainty to glacier reconstructions. In this paper, we use
numerical glacier model experiments to investigate the LGM climate of the central
North Island, New Zealand, in order to answer the following questions:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p>What are the temperature and precipitation changes, relative to present, required to simulate the LGM ice masses in the central North Island?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>How do post-glacial topographic changes on the volcanoes influence our glacier-model-based estimates of LGM climate?</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Setting</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Geology and climate of the central North Island volcanoes</title>
      <p>Located in the central North Island, New Zealand (39.2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S 175.6<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E;
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>), the Tongariro Volcanic Centre (TgVC) represents the
southernmost expression of the Taupo Volcanic Zone, which is a ca. 300 km
long, northeast-trending belt of subduction zone volcanism at the
Australian–Pacific plate margin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.21"/>. TgVC is dominated by the
andesite–dacite stratovolcanic centres of Tongariro massif (including Mt
Tongariro – 1967 m above sea level (a.s.l.) and the Holocene cone of Mt
Ngauruhoe – 2287 m a.s.l.) and Mt Ruapehu (2797 m a.s.l.). Radiometric dating of
lava flows indicates that cone-building volcanism in the region began before
ca. 275 ka <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx92 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.22"/>, and both centres have exhibited
effusive volcanic activity in historical times <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.23"/>.</p>
      <p>Local climate, as recorded at Whakapapa Village (1100 m a.s.l.; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a) on the northwest flank of Mt Ruapehu, is characterised
by high annual precipitation (ca. 2700 mm a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b),
with low seasonal variability. For example, winter (JJA) precipitation
averages ca. 760 mm, compared to ca. 620 mm in summer. Monthly mean
temperatures at this altitude range from ca. 13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in February to ca. 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in July,
with an annual average of 7.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (AD 2000–2010;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="altparen.24"/>; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c). At 2797 m a.s.l., Mt Ruapehu is
the highest peak in the North Island and the only to intercept the present-day
end-of-summer snowline. Several small (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) cirque glaciers
currently exist on the upper mountain slopes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). The
average annual end-of-summer snowline for the cirque glaciers on Mt Ruapehu
is ca. 2500 m <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.25"/>. No glacial ice is present on Tongariro massif
today.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Last Glacial Maximum ice extent in the central North Island</title>
      <p>Abundant geomorphic evidence for glacial erosion and deposition, situated
several kilometres down-valley of the present-day ice limits, has long been
recognised in the central North Island
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx97 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.26"/>. Two
independent mountain-scale assessments of moraine distribution on Mt Ruapehu
have produced mapped reconstructions of a former late Pleistocene ice mass
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.27"/>, which are in good agreement with one
another (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). One mountain-scale palaeoglacial
reconstruction of a late Pleistocene ice mass has been undertaken for
Tongariro massif (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="altparen.28"/>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). These
reconstructions suggest small ice caps/ice fields were present on each
volcano, and were drained by several valley glaciers that terminated at
elevations between 1100 and 1400 m.</p>
      <p>Until recently, age control for glacial landforms on the volcanoes has been
based on moraine tephrostratigraphy
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx98 bib1.bibx97 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.29"/> and
morphostratigraphic correlation of moraines to dated glacial formations in
the Southern Alps <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.30"/>. Recent
applications of surface exposure dating to moraine boulders, using
locally calibrated cosmogenic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>He <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.31"/>, have provided
direct, quantitative age constraints for late Pleistocene glacier
fluctuations in the central North Island <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.32"/>. On the western
side of Tongariro massif, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.33"/> show that the innermost
moraines in Mangatepopo valley (MPO; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>) were deposited
ca. 30–18 ka during the LGM; meanwhile, a moraine positioned outboard of the
LGM limits records an earlier glacial advance that occurred prior to 57 ka.
These moraines are separated in age by ca. 30–40 kyr,
and exhibit markedly
different morphology. For example, the older moraine is characterised by
lower slope angles (ca. 10–15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), a more rounded ridge crest, and lower
frequency of large (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) boulders on the surface. These
characteristics likely represent the effects of sub-aerial erosion of the
moraine in a periglacial setting during the latter half of the last glacial
cycle. In comparison, the LGM moraine exhibits steeper surface slopes (ca.
20–25<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), higher relief, and a more narrow ridge crest.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Glacial catchments targeted in our model experiments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Glacier</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Code</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Extant glacier</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Valley</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ELA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(Y/N)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">aspect</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(m a.s.l.; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="altparen.34"/>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Mt Ruapehu </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Whakapapaiti</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WHA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NW</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2550–2650<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mangaturuturu</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MTU</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Y</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SW</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2450–2600</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wahianoa</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WAH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Y</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">not reported</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mangatoetoenui</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MTO</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Y</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2400–2500</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Tongariro massif </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mangatepopo</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MPO</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">W</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Waihohonu</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WAI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mangatawai</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MTA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unnamed</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">UNK</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mangahouhounui</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MHO</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Glacier became extinct subsequent to 1988 survey.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>The new cosmogenic surface exposure dates of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.35"/> confirm
previous assignments of the inner Mangatepopo moraines to the LGM (e.g.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx97 bib1.bibx6" id="altparen.36"/>) and provide more robust
chronological data to support morphostratigraphic correlations of proximal,
undated moraines. Using these new insights, we have undertaken independent
mapping of moraines on both volcanoes using a combination of field
investigations and inspection of aerial imagery. We have identified nine
catchments where the LGM ice limits can be defined with reasonable confidence
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). Five catchments on Tongariro
massif contain well-preserved lateral moraines that delineate valley glaciers
terminating between 1100 and 1400 m. On the eastern side of the massif, valley
glaciers were present in the Mangahouhounui (MHO), Mangatawai (MTA), and
Waihohonu (WAI) valleys, as well as an unnamed tributary stream (labelled
here as “UNK”; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). We also include the dated LGM
moraines of Mangatepopo valley (MPO), situated on the western side of the
massif. On Mt Ruapehu, we target four former valley glaciers that terminated
between 1100 and 1200 m a.s.l. in the Mangatoetoenui (MTO), Wahianoa (WAH),
Mangaturuturu (MTU), and Whakapapanui (WHA) valleys (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>;
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). The former ice limits in each of these nine
catchments are well-defined by lateral moraines and correspond closely with
the independent LGM ice reconstruction of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.37"/> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). Our assignment of an LGM age to undated moraines is
primarily based on morphostratigraphic correlation informed by the recent
moraine dating and moraine morphology observations from western Tongariro
massif <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.38"/> and southern Mt Ruapehu (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="altparen.39"/>). Further constraints on the timing
of moraine formation and ice extent at the LGM are provided by the age and
distribution of pre-, syn-, and post-LGM lava flow emplacement
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx16" id="altparen.40"/>;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="altparen.41"/>) and the stratigraphic relationship of these flows to
both moraines and glaciated valleys.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Glacier model</title>
      <p>The aim of this study is to constrain the mean annual temperature and
precipitation changes, from present, that may have caused glaciers in central
the North Island to advance to their LGM extents, using a glacier modelling
approach. Several previous studies have adopted this geologically constrained
glacier modelling approach to reconstruct past climate in New Zealand (e.g.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx84 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx78" id="altparen.42"/>). In this study we use the coupled energy balance–ice flow model of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.43"/>. A key advantage of this
model for our purpose is that mass balance and vertically integrated ice flow
are calculated in two dimensions, which (1) captures any potential changes
in ice divides that may have occurred under greater ice thicknesses in the
past (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="altparen.44"/>) and (2) produces outputs that are readily
comparable to the 2-D moraine-based ice mass reconstructions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). Furthermore, our physically based model is very similar
(e.g. types of input data, required parameterisation) to that of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.45"/>, which has been applied to sites in the Southern
Alps to derive quantitative estimates of LGM climate (e.g.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84 bib1.bibx77" id="altparen.46"/>).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Model input data</title>
      <p>Terrain elevation data come from the 15 m resolution New Zealand School of
Surveying Digital Elevation Model (NZSoSDEM) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.47"/>, which we
resampled to 100 m. An ice mask is created using the “snow/ice” data from the
Land Information New Zealand NZMS260 map series. This mask is assigned the
mean ice thickness values reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.48"/>, who derived thickness
estimates from ice-penetrating radar surveys and crevasse depth measurements.
These data are used to create an ice-free DEM, which is used as the initial
topography for each model simulation.</p>
      <p>Climate data for the energy balance and snow accumulation models come from
several sources. Solar radiation and relative humidity are from the NIWA
Virtual Climate Station Network gridded data sets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.49"/> and are
resampled to 100 m resolution using bilinear interpolation. Following
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.50"/>, wind speed data come from the National
Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) 850 hPa level reanalysis data
(1981–2010; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="altparen.51"/>). This data set is scaled against
observational data and applied uniformly over the model domain.</p>
      <p>We use 30-year (1981–2010), monthly mean temperature and precipitation rate
data from individual climate stations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.52"/> distributed around and
within the model domain. These data are interpolated onto grids using the
methods described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.53"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.54"/>. For the temperature interpolations, we use the upland
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 m) seasonal lapse rates of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.55"/> (DJF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C;
MAM <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; JJA <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; SON <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), which have
been shown to best predict temperatures in alpine regions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="paren.56"/>. During model runs, temperature-dependent components
are run at a daily time step and stochastic variability is introduced to the
monthly temperature data via random selection of a normally distributed
(mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0; SD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) perturbation value (sensu
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="altparen.57"/>). The standard deviation of this distribution
represents the mean standard deviation of daily mean temperature for each
month at Whakapapa Village (AD 2000–2010; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="altparen.58"/>), situated on the
northwest flank of Mt Ruapehu (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a). To create monthly
precipitation grids, we use the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.59"/>,
whereby precipitation measurements from surrounding local and distal climate
stations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40) dictate the proportion of annual precipitation
that falls each month. Annual precipitation totals are provided by the mean
annual surface of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="text.60"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Mass balance model</title>
      <p>To simulate snow accumulation, precipitation is partitioned into rain and
snow using a temperature threshold (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). Snow
accumulation occurs in grid cells when temperature falls below this
threshold, set to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. To simulate ablation, the energy
balance equation (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) is solved within a distributed energy
balance model (EBM) as developed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="altparen.61"/>) and previously
applied at individual glaciers and regionally, in present-day
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="altparen.62"/>) and palaeoglaciological
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="altparen.63"/>) studies in New Zealand.</p>
      <p><disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>G</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the energy available for melt, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is incoming shortwave
radiation, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is incoming longwave radiation, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
outgoing longwave radiation, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are sensible and latent heat
fluxes respectively, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>G</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the geothermal heat flux, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
sub-surface heat flux, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is heat input from
rain.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Optimal glacier model parameter settings, sources, and sensitivity test values.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Source</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sensitivity test values</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Snow albedo (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>snow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.64"/>
                    </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.67–0.77</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Snow–rain threshold temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.65"/>
                    </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0–1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Temperature lapse rate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Seasonal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.66"/>
                    </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ice roughness (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.004 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.67"/>
                    </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0008–0.01 m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Snow roughness (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>snow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.001 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.68"/>
                    </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0005–0.002 m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Typical sliding velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50 m yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.69"/>
                    </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20–80 m yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Glen's flow law coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.14 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Pa<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="text.70"/>
                    </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1e<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–1e<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Pa<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Incoming shortwave radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) comprises both direct and diffuse
components <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.71"/>. The effect of changing orbital geometry is
accounted for using the insolation calculations of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.72"/> for 21 ka. Albedo (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is parameterised
according to the ELA-dependent scheme of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.73"/>, whereby
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with elevation and snow thickness, relative to the
equilibrium line altitude. Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.74"/>, we use <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>snow</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.72 and explore the impact of this parameterisation in sensitivity
tests (sensu <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="altparen.75"/>). Longwave radiation fluxes
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) include the effects of surrounding topography,
cloudiness, and air temperature
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.76"/>. Turbulent heat fluxes
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are calculated using the bulk method and include the roughness
of snow and ice and the Richardson stability criterion (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx4" id="altparen.77"/>).</p>
      <p>The sub-surface heat flux (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), commonly referred to as ground heat flux,
describes energy exchanges between the glacier surface and the glacier
interior. As we assume that the ice is temperate and that the glacier surface
is constantly at the melting point <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.78"/>, there is no
temperature gradient; therefore <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.</p>
      <p>In active volcanic regions, convection and advection of heat to the surface
via mantle upwelling and redistribution can raise the geothermal heat flux by
several orders of magnitude. In glacierised, active volcanic regions,
geothermal heat fluxes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>G</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on the order of 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
have been inferred from glacier calorimetry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.79"/>. If sustained, such heat fluxes can have a non-trivial
impact on glacier mass balance; however, these extreme cases are typically
only sustained over the order of days to weeks (e.g.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.80"/>). Thus, while raised geothermal heat fluxes
can therefore potentially complicate the climatic interpretation of glacier
fluctuations over annual to decadal timescales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx81" id="paren.81"/>, climate is the dominant driver of glacier mass balance and
length changes on active volcanoes over centennial to millennial timescales
(e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx69" id="altparen.82"/>).
We employ a nominal geothermal flux of 1 W m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ( ca. 10 cm water
equivalent annual melt) and discuss the possible implications of past
volcanism for the palaeoclimatic interpretations derived from glacier model
experiments.</p>
      <p>We do not include the effects of surface debris cover in our simulations.
Historically, debris cover on the glaciers situated on Mt Ruapehu has varied
greatly in space and time. During the most recent sustained volcanic
eruptions (AD 1995–96), all glaciers became covered by volcanic products.
However, the majority of this material has since been removed via surface
runoff or buried by winter snow, such that today only ice bodies with a low
surface slope and those situated close to the current volcanic vent, such as
the Summit Plateau and the upper Whangaehu Glacier, remain partially
debris-covered. We acknowledge the potential for past debris cover as an
additional source of uncertainty in the simulations and provide further
consideration of the specific impacts that these phenomena may have for our
findings (Sect. 5).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>Ice flow model</title>
      <p>Ice flow is described using a vertically integrated, two-dimensional (2-D)
model based on the shallow ice approximation (SIA)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.83"/>. A full description is given in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.84"/>. This formulation assumes ice flow is driven by
vertical shear stresses, and therefore compressional and tensional (longitudinal)
stresses are neglected <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.85"/>. We consider that the role of
longitudinal stresses on past glacial flow in the glacial troughs studied
here would be low, owing to the low-angle bed slopes and absence of steep,
bounding valley sides that characterise typical alpine glacier environments.
Furthermore, several comparison studies between SIA and higher-order ice flow
models show little difference in steady-state ice geometries (e.g.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx49" id="altparen.86"/>), such as those used
here for palaeoclimate reconstruction. Thus, the SIA is commonly applied in
mountain glacier environments for palaeoclimatic reconstructions, where mass
balance imparts the greatest uncertainty in simulated glacier extents (e.g.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx22" id="altparen.87"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Modelled glacier extent and mass balance on Mt Ruapehu summit for
present-day climate (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0), compared to the
mapped extent of ice and perennial snow from Land Information New Zealand
(black outlines). Mass balance is shown for grid cells that are ice-covered
as predicted by the flow model. Prominent glaciers and landforms mentioned in
the text are labelled.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/12/943/2016/cp-12-943-2016-f03.pdf"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Model assessment</title>
      <p>As a test of model performance, we compare the modelled, steady-state ice
extent and mass balance on Mt Ruapehu summit for present day (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0), against mapped ice extent from Land Information
New Zealand topographic maps (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). Steady-state ice extent
modelled using the optimal parameter set listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>
shows reasonable agreement with empirical ice extents in the majority of the
catchments of interest for this study (e.g. Mangatoetoenui, Wahianoa,
Mangaturuturu; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). However, this simulation also produces
ice extents in two catchments, Whangaehu and Whakapapa, which are far greater
than observed (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). Ice accumulation in the Crater Lake
basin represents an important source of this excess model ice. Today, Crater
Lake is a large body of water (ca. 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) that occupies the
active volcanic vent and fluctuates in temperature between ca. 10 and 60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C with periodicities of 4–16 months <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.88"/>. Thus,
the lake represents an important energy source that prevents snow
accumulation at the lake site and raises air temperatures and humidity in the
vicinity, thus melting ice flowing towards the lake <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.89"/>.
Neglecting these processes in our model causes ice accumulation at the lake
site, which feeds into the Whangaehu and Whakapapa glaciers, thus causing
greater ice extents than observed today (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). Based on the
increased frequency of hydrovolcanic products in tephra sequences on the
surrounding ring plain, Crater Lake is believed to have formed in the mid- to
late Holocene (ca. 3 ka; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="altparen.90"/>). This post-dates the time
period of interest for our glacier modelling application. Thus, although the
lake currently represents an important energy source controlling snow
accumulation patterns, we do not include this energy source in our
palaeo-simulations. It is also notable that modelled ice extent in catchments
that do not receive ice from Crater Lake (i.e. Mangaehuehu, Wahianoa,
Mangatoetoenui) are better aligned with modern observations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>).</p>
      <p>A further source of uncertainty in simulating the small present-day glaciers
(e.g. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>) is the role of wind in redistributing snow on
the summit region. Previous mass balance observations on Whakapapa and
Whangaheu glaciers have noted “inverted snowlines” <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.91"/>,
whereby winter accumulation has been redistributed by wind, from the glacial
accumulation areas to the lower portions of the glaciers. Including a
numerical scheme for this process is computationally expensive
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.92"/>, and has high uncertainties in topographically
complex regions such as Mt Ruapehu, where both the present and past wind
fields are largely unknown. Furthermore, wind redistribution of snow is of
greater importance for the mass balance of small glaciers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.93"/>,
such as the present-day glaciers on Mt Ruapehu, but less important for
larger glaciers, such as those that existed during the LGM, where climatic
gradients dominate the mass balance profile. We note that the moraine
distribution does not indicate any notable asymmetry in the past ice geometry
as might be expected if snow redistribution by prevailing winds was an
important control on mass balance in the geological past (e.g.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="altparen.94"/>). Thus, we do not attempt to model this process but
acknowledge it as a potential source of uncertainty in our mass balance
simulations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Experimental design</title>
      <p>We designed a series of three different experiments to constrain the
magnitude of LGM cooling in the central North Island and the sensitivity of our
results to post-glacial changes in bed topography. In each model simulation,
ice thickness is updated by the ice flow model every 5 model years, and mass
balance is recalculated every 20 model years. Each simulation is run to an
equilibrium state, which is achieved when the rate of ice volume change
becomes close to zero and takes 200–350 model years depending on the
magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We follow the experimental design of previous
similar studies (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx22" id="altparen.95"/>) in
holding model parameters constant for all simulations (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>), while iteratively varying temperature and/or precipitation
to achieve a fit with the geological evidence. We investigate the sensitivity
of our results to this parameterisation by re-running the experiments with
systematic variations of key parameters
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>).<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Geologically informed reconstruction of pre-15 ka topography,
displayed as a difference (in metres) from modern topographic boundary
conditions, for glacier model domains of <bold>(a)</bold> Mt Ruapehu (1: Whakapapa flows
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.96"/>; 2: Holocene flows in upper Mangaturuturu
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.97"/>; 3: Rangatauanui flow; 4: Saddle Cone flow(s);
5–6: post-LGM flows in and adjacent to Mangatoetoenui valley
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.98"/>) and <bold>(b)</bold> Tongariro massif (7: North Crater; 8: Mt Ngauruhoe;
9: Tama Lakes explosion craters; 10: Oturere flows). Blues: surface lowering relative to present (negative change);
reds: elevation gain
relative to present (positive change).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/12/943/2016/cp-12-943-2016-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Experiment 1: step coolings</title>
      <p>Temperature changes from present (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, at
intervals of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, are applied uniformly across the domain and the
resultant ice masses are allowed to evolve to a steady-state geometry. These
experiments permit an initial assessment of the patterns of ice growth across
both volcanoes and the results serve as a guide for the refined
catchment-specific simulations of the LGM ice masses carried out in
Experiments 2 and 3 (described below).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Experiment 2: moraine-based simulations</title>
      <p>Experiment 2 uses steady-state simulations to constrain the combinations of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that produce LGM ice extents indicated
by the geological evidence in individual catchments (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>).
Simulations are run at the whole mountain scale in order to capture any
changing ice divides that result from a growing ice mass. For efficiency,
separate simulations are run for each volcano. A satisfactory result was
obtained when the modelled glacier terminus reached within 1 grid cell (100 m) of the LGM limit,
as inferred from geomorphology mapping (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). These simulations are repeated for three precipitation
scenarios: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25, and 0 % change from present.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS3">
  <title>Experiment 3: palaeo-topography</title>
      <p>Here we repeat Experiment 2 using modified topographic boundary conditions in
order to assess the sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to known post-glacial
changes in local topography. A digital elevation model of the pre-15 ka
topography has been reconstructed using the results of a 5-year project to
constrain the spatial and temporal geomorphic evolution of this region. For
example, compilation of existing mapping (e.g.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx99 bib1.bibx76" id="altparen.99"/>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>),
together with extensive field mapping and new radiometric dating, has been
used to produce <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>60 000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scale maps of the volcanic geology, which delineate
individual lava flows <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="paren.100"/>. To generate
palaeo-topographies for these simulations, modern DEMs were manually altered
to approximate the post-glacial (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 ka) topography.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> shows the difference between the present-day
topography and our reconstructed pre-15 ka surfaces. On Mt Ruapehu,
post-glacial lava flows are concentrated on the northern slopes and extend
several kilometres from the summit region (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a).
Post-glacial (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 ka) eruption ages have been assigned to these lava flows
based on (i) their position within moraine-bound glaciated valleys, (ii) the
good preservation of flow structures on the lava surfaces indicating that
they have not been subsequently overrun by ice <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.101"/>,
and (iii) recent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ar/<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>39</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ar dating of several flows within these
packages that yield <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 ka ages <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.102"/>. In addition, small
increases in elevation relative to present have been made on the upper
mountain in areas where known, well-dated post-glacial debris avalanches have
occurred (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx25" id="altparen.103"/>).</p>
      <p>On Tongariro massif, the post-glacial cones of Mt Ngauruhoe (site 8; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 ka – <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="altparen.104"/>) and North Crater (site 7), and the
valley-filling lava flows of Oturere valley (site 10) have been removed (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b). To the south of the mountain, the early Holocene
explosion craters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.105"/> now occupied by Tama
Lakes (site 9) have been infilled, which represents the only region of
significant elevation gain on Tongariro massif.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Experiment 1. Modelled, steady-state ice thickness (in metres) and
extent on Mt Ruapehu and Tongariro massif resulting from step coolings of
2 to 7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C from present, with precipitation unchanged.
Solid and dashed lines represent geologically constrained LGM ice limits of
greater and lesser confidence, respectively (modified from
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="altparen.106"/>). See text for catchment labels.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/12/943/2016/cp-12-943-2016-f05.pdf"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Palaeo-equilibrium line altitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ELA) of the simulated LGM glaciers and the difference from present using
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ELA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (m): arithmetic mean of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.107"/>, 2483 m a.s.l.; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ELA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>obs</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: change from the mid-point of
observed present-day ELAs of individual glaciers given by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.108"/>, where available (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Catchment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ELA (m a.s.l.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ELA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ELA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>obs</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Modelled <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mangatawai (MTA)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1380</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1103</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Waihohonu (WAI)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1390</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1093</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mangahouhounui (MHO)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1460</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1023</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mangatepopo (MPO)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1510</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>973</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Unnamed (UNK)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1550</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>933</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mangaturuturu (MTU)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1530</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>953</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>995</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mangatoetoenui (MTO)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1580</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>903</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>870</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Whakapapaiti (WHA)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1550</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>933</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1050</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wahianoa (WAH)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1660</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>823</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Experiment 1: step coolings</title>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows steady-state ice thickness results of
Experiment 1, conducted over a domain covering both Mt Ruapehu and Tongariro
massif. Also shown are the inferred LGM ice limits of greater and lesser
confidence (from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). Modest coolings of 2–3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
from present are sufficient to produce a small ice mass on Mt Ruapehu, but
this temperature change is insufficient to promote ice accumulation on
Tongariro massif. A cooling of 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is sufficient to meet the
well-defined LGM limits in the WAH catchment on southeast Mt Ruapehu;
however, the termini of other simulated valley glaciers on this volcano
remain well upstream of their mapped limits. In this scenario, ice
accumulation on Tongariro is restricted to elevations <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ca.
1900 m a.s.l. and therefore remains well short of the mapped LGM limits (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>). Modelled ice extent approaches the LGM limits in the
remaining three catchments (MTO, WHA, MTU) on Mt Ruapehu when
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and these limits are exceeded in all
catchments at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. On Tongariro massif, modelled
ice extent approaches the moraine limits in several catchments (MPO, MHO,
UNK) in response to a cooling of 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. At <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, the individual ice masses of the two volcanoes have merged and ice
exceeds the LGM limits in all catchments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Experiment 2. <bold>(a)</bold> Temperature forcing, from present, necessary to
simulate inferred LGM ice geometries in catchments on Mt Ruapehu and
Tongariro massif. Results shown for three precipitation change (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
scenarios: 0 % (black), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 % (blue), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 % (red) change from
present. Underlined labels on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represent catchments where modelled
ice thickness spills over ice-marginal landforms, before reaching the
geologically inferred terminus (see text). Grey shading depicts the
pollen-based southern North Island LGM temperature-lowering estimate of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.109"/> (6.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) – derived using the partial
least-squares method and the glacier-model-derived Southern Alps LGM cooling
estimate of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.110"/> (6.0 to 6.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, when
precipitation is reduced by 25 %). <bold>(b)</bold> The sensitivity of
palaeotemperature reconstructions for the following parameters: albedo of
snow (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>snow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), snow temperature threshold (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>snow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), air
temperature lapse rate (d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>/d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and ice surface roughness
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Dashed lines indicate the mean impact of each sensitivity test.
Flow parameters <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (not shown) have a negligible
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) impact on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/12/943/2016/cp-12-943-2016-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Modelled, steady-state ice geometry on Mt Ruapehu when
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 (Experiment 2).
This represents the best-fit simulation for the WHA catchment.
<bold>(b)</bold> Steady-state ice geometry on Tongariro massif when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> =
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 (Experiment 2). This is the best
fit to the inferred LGM terminus in the WAI catchment; however, note the ice
overspill at the lateral margins.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/12/943/2016/cp-12-943-2016-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Experiment 3. <bold>(a)</bold> Temperature forcing, from present
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>experiment 3</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), necessary to simulate inferred LGM ice
geometries in catchments on Mt Ruapehu and Tongariro massif, using the
modified, pre-15 ka topography. Results shown for three precipitation change
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) scenarios: 0 % (black), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 % (blue), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 % (red)
change from present. Underlined labels on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represent catchments
where modelled ice thickness spills over ice-marginal landforms, before
reaching the geologically inferred terminus (see text). Vertical black lines
and light-grey shading depict the pollen-based southern North Island LGM
temperature estimate of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.111"/> (6.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) –
derived using the partial least-squares method. Dashed black lines and dark-grey shading depict the glacier-model-derived Southern Alps LGM temperature
estimate of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.112"/> (6.0–6.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, when precipitation
is reduced by 25 %). <bold>(b)</bold> The difference in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between model
simulations in Experiment 3 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>experiment 3</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Experiment
2 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>experiment 2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/12/943/2016/cp-12-943-2016-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\vspace{-3mm}}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Experiment 2: moraine-based simulations</title>
      <p>The temperature change required to simulate the LGM ice geometries in each
catchment, as delineated by geological evidence, ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.0 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C when
precipitation remains unchanged from present (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a). Steady-state equilibrium line altitudes for these
simulations range from ca. 1380 to 1660 m a.s.l., which represent depressions of ca.
820–1100 m from present (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). Imposing a 25 % increase in
modern precipitation reduces <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by ca. 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for all
catchments (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>); meanwhile, decreasing modern
precipitation by 25 % requires increases in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of ca. 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a).</p>
      <p>Sensitivity tests of key energy balance parameters impact the
palaeotemperature reconstructions by up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for the chosen
ranges (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b). Altering the albedo of snow
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>snow</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.67–0.77) and snow temperature threshold
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>snow</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0–1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) has the greatest effects (ca. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1–0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C).
Using a temperature lapse rate (d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>/d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.006 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, uniformly applied across all months, decreases
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by 0.1–0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Changing the characteristic ice
roughness length (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0008–0.01 m) also causes deviations
in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1–0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, relative to the optimal
setting. Flow parameters <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> have a negligible (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
impact on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Findings from Experiment 1 highlighted the variability in the LGM
palaeoclimate reconstructions that exists, both between volcanoes and
between individual catchments. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a shows that the
Wahianoa (WAH) catchment on Mt Ruapehu requires a conspicuously smaller
temperature change from present to match the identified LGM ice limits
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0), compared to
all other catchments studied (ca. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.2 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, when
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0). Also, there is an offset in the temperature forcings
necessary to simulate the mapped LGM ice limits between the two volcanoes.
Catchments on Tongariro massif range require coolings of ca. 6.0 to 6.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), when precipitation is unchanged, whilst
catchments on Mt Ruapehu require 4.0 to 5.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
or 5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C when WAH is removed). Finally, the results presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> represent the climatic forcing, from present, required to
meet the inferred downstream limits of LGM glaciation. In several catchments,
ice spills over ice-marginal indicators, such as lateral moraines, before the
geologically constrained termini are reached (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a, b).
The possible reasons for the discrepancies, and the potential implications
for palaeoclimate estimates, are discussed below (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS1"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Experiment 3: palaeo-topography</title>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a shows the change in temperature from present
required to simulate the mapped LGM geometries in the nine catchments, using
topographic boundary conditions that more closely approximate that of the LGM
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). When precipitation remains unchanged from present,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from ca. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.1 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, which represents
differences of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C from Experiment 2 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b). In all catchments except one (MTO), more cooling was
required, relative to Experiment 2 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b). The greatest
changes in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between Experiment 2 and Experiment 3 occurs in
the UNK catchment, where ca. 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C of additional cooling is required
to simulate the inferred glacial geometries (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b). This
change is the result of reduced ice flux from the vicinity of Mt Ngauruhoe,
caused by the elevation reduction in the accumulation area, following removal
of this Holocene-aged volcanic cone (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). However, this
topographic alteration has less of an impact in the WAI catchment, where
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reduced by 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, relative to Experiment 2.
Whilst removal of Mt Ngauruhoe may act to channel ice flow into the WAI
catchment, the overall reduction in elevation reduces snow accumulation,
therefore reducing the impact on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The imposed topographic
changes did not improve the poor fit between modelled ice geometry and the
geological constraints, as ice still spills over lateral moraines in the WAI
and MTA catchments before reaching the inferred LGM termini.</p>
      <p>On Mt Ruapehu, the major changes to the topography were made in the MTO
catchment, which is the only catchment where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased by ca.
0.1–0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, relative to Experiment 2 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b). In
this instance, the removal of syn- and post-LGM lava flows in the upper and
middle parts of this catchments has resulted in increased ice flux to the
lower valley, despite the overall reduction in elevation. This is caused by a
reduction in the ice flux leaving the catchment through overspill, which
helps offset the effect of increased temperature caused by the reduction in
bed elevation. In the other catchments on Mt Ruapehu (MTU, WAH, WHA),
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was reduced by 0.1–0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C relative to Experiment 2.
Thus, accounting for post-glacial changes in bed topography cannot resolve
the anomalous <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> result in the WAH catchment. Finally, there
remains a poor fit between the geologically inferred lateral ice margins in
the MTU catchment and those simulated in Experiment 3.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>Using a numerical glacier model, we have provided quantitative constraints of
the temperature depression from present in the central North Island during the
LGM and the sensitivity of these results to model parameterisation and
changing topographic boundary conditions. The main findings are as follows:
(1) the temperature depression required to simulate the LGM glacial
geometries of individual catchments varies between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.0 and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
(2) there is a systematic offset of ca. 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the model-derived
palaeotemperatures associated with LGM moraines between the two volcanoes,
and
(3) using geologically constrained reconstructions of LGM topography has
relatively little impact (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) on the palaeotemperature
reconstruction. Below, we first consider the possible sources of uncertainty,
before placing the results in context of other, local terrestrial and marine
palaeotemperature proxy reconstructions.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <title>The role of changing topography on palaeoclimate estimates</title>
      <p>Improved constraint of the timing and extent of late Quaternary volcanism in
the central North Island (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx16" id="altparen.113"/>;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="altparen.114"/>) has allowed a test of the impact that changing
topographic boundary conditions have on palaeoclimate estimates for glacier
modelling. Using topographic reconstructions, informed by these recent field
mapping and radiometric dating campaigns, the temperature forcing required to
simulate the inferred LGM glaciers is altered by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The
majority of the imposed topographic changes serve to remove post-glacial lava
flows that have built volcanic cones (e.g. Mt Ngauruhoe) or infilled glacial
troughs (e.g. MTO, MPO; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). Subtraction of these
features from the present-day land surface has lowered the glacier bed
elevation, which raises the local surface air temperature and explains why
most catchments require increased cooling to achieve the LGM limits in
Experiment 3, relative to Experiment 2. Thus, our results from experiment 2
may underestimate LGM temperature anomalies by up to 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. These
experiments demonstrate the importance of considering potential post- or
syn-glacial (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="altparen.115"/>) changes in subglacial bed
topography, when extracting palaeoclimate information from the glacial record
using glacier modelling.</p>
      <p>Removal of the post-glacial lava flows in the vicinity of the MTO catchment
reduced the temperature forcing required to simulate the LGM ice geometry in
that catchment by ca. 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, relative to Experiment 2. Reduced
overspill, as shown by the improved fit between the model output and the
lateral moraines, indicates that the retention of ice within the MTO
catchment was improved by the imposed topographic changes and this effect was
sufficient to offset the decreased accumulation/increased ablation induced
by land surface lowering. However, the imposed topographic changes did not
improve the fit in all catchments where overspill occurs (e.g. MTA, WAI,
MTU); thus, it is probable that the LGM palaeotemperature estimates presented
in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> for these catchments
overestimate the true magnitude of LGM temperature change. This
interpretation is supported by the fact that these catchments require the
greatest magnitude of cooling, relative to present, of all catchments on the
respective volcanoes. Discounting the reconstructions from these catchments
leaves LGM palaeotemperature estimate ranges of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.1 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for
Mt Ruapehu and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.1 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for Tongariro massif (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0;
Experiment 3). Thus, accounting for ice overspill and known topographic
changes is insufficient to resolve the apparent offset between LGM
palaeotemperature estimates between these two volcanoes.</p>
      <p>Geometric constraint of well-preserved post-glacial lava flows can be
achieved with relative ease via detailed field investigations. However, the
recognition of post-glacial erosional events (e.g. sector collapse, fluvial
incision) and subsequent topographic reconstruction is less straightforward.
Some erosional events are identifiable in the modern landscape on Mt Ruapehu
(e.g. Murimotu Formation sector collapse at 10.4–10.6 cal ka BP;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="altparen.116"/>); however, the precise source locations and
pre-erosional topographies remain highly uncertain (e.g.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx57" id="altparen.117"/>). Such
erosional events alter drainage pathways and bed hypsometries, with potential
implications for modelled ice distributions and palaeoclimatic
reconstruction. For example, it can be hypothesised that the offset in LGM
temperature reconstructions between the glacial catchments of Mt Ruapehu and
Tongariro massif is caused by post-glacial change in the relative altitudes
of the two volcanoes. A post-glacial decrease in the summit altitude of
Tongariro massif, relative to Mt Ruapehu, could explain the need for greater
cooling on Tongariro massif in the simulations presented here. However, there
is little geological evidence to support the notion that Tongariro massif has
experienced major post-glacial degradation, nor that Mt Ruapehu has
significantly increased in elevation since the LGM. This absence of evidence,
combined with the fact that known changes in topographic boundary conditions
had relatively little impact on palaeotemperature reconstructions (Experiment
3), makes it unlikely that post-glacial topographic change is the primary
source of this systematic offset.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>Other sources of uncertainty</title>
      <p>The glacier modelling experiments presented here suggest that stadial
conditions in the central North Island were characterised by temperatures 4 to 7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C lower than present (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). Here we first discuss
the possible reasons for the inter-catchment and inter-volcano variability in
palaeotemperature reconstructions, before placing our results in the context
of other, quantitative palaeoclimate reconstructions from the New Zealand
region.</p>
      <p>Our results show a ca. 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C spread in palaeotemperature estimates
between individual catchments and a ca. 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C disparity between the two
volcanoes. Given the relatively small influence of known topographic changes
as a driver, we consider these differences can be explained predominantly by
the combination of three principal factors, which we discuss below.</p>
      <p>First, differences in climate forcing may arise from chronological
uncertainty. Only two of the catchments studied here (MPO, WAH) have moraines
been directly dated to the LGM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx24" id="altparen.118"/>), while
others are inferred from moraine morphostratigrahy and indirect age
constraints (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx16" id="altparen.119"/>;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="altparen.120"/>). Moraines representing glacial advances prior to the
LGM have been recognised and dated on Tongariro massif <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.121"/>;
therefore, it is possible that some of the limits we targeted predate the LGM.
However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.122"/> noted a distinct morphological difference in
the preservation of moraines formed early in the last glacial cycle (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 59
ka) and those constructed during the LGM. The undated moraines targeted in
our study had been correlated to the LGM based primarily on their similar
morphology and degree of preservation to dated landforms; therefore, we
consider it unlikely that our simulations have targeted pre-LGM glacial
limits. A separate possibility is that our targets represent different
advances within the LGM. This cold climatic interval spans ca. 10 kyr, during
which time there were significant fluctuations in climate over
millennial timescales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx88" id="paren.123"/>. Indeed, exposure
ages of LGM moraines do show evidence for multiple moraine building episodes
30–18 ka (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="altparen.124"/>). Thus, the inter-catchment
variability seen in our palaeotemperature estimates may in part reflect the
range of temperature cooling events during this prolonged but variable cold
period.</p>
      <p>Second, inaccuracies in the present-day climate data, particularly
precipitation distribution, may impart some error to the palaeotemperature
reconstructions. The paucity of high-altitude precipitation data for the
present-day represents an important source of uncertainty in both modern and
palaeo-applications of glacier mass balance models. For example,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="text.125"/> find that uncertainty in present-day precipitation
distribution imparts uncertainty of up to 25 % in modelled LGM glacier
length in the central Southern Alps, which equates to about 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in
the palaeotemperature estimate. The good agreement between observed ice
distribution on Mt Ruapehu and ice geometries simulated using the 30-year
(AD 1981–2010) average climate data sets (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>) provides
confidence that these data sets provide a useful starting point from which to
assess the local LGM climate anomaly in catchments on Mt Ruapehu. However,
no glaciers exist on Tongariro massif today and there are no climate stations
on the volcano; therefore, it is more difficult to assess how representative
the modern climate grids are for this region.</p>
      <p>Underestimation of the present-day precipitation rate on Tongariro massif
provides one possible explanation for our finding that slightly greater
temperature forcings are needed to match the LGM limits on Tongariro massif,
relative to Mt Ruapehu. The precipitation–temperature relationships
presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a indicate that precipitation changes of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 % are balanced by temperature changes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ca. 0.6–0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, which is consistent with similar estimates for the South Island
glaciers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.126"/>. Thus, precipitation on
Tongariro would need to be increased by 30–50 %, relative to Mt Ruapehu,
in order to account for the ca. 1.0–1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C temperature difference
associated with the inferred LGM glacial limits between the two volcanoes.
This magnitude is quite large and we consider it unlikely that the present-day spatial precipitation gradient is inaccurate to such a degree;
however,
this may still represent an important contributing factor. Potential past
changes in local precipitation gradients, for example arising from
atmospheric circulation changes (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="altparen.127"/>), may also
contribute. Improved constraint of present and past precipitation rates will
reduce these uncertainties.</p>
      <p>Third, spatial heterogeneities in key glaciological parameters may account
for some of the spatial differences in palaeotemperatures seen in this study.
The sensitivity tests presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b provide a
first-order assessment of the uncertainty imparted by parameters in the
energy balance model. Varying key parameters within acceptable bounds causes
deviations in reconstructed temperatures of up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, which
indicates that some of the inter-catchment variability in palaeotemperatures
(e.g. WAH catchment) could be explained by spatial heterogeneities in model
parameters, which are currently assumed uniform across the model domain.</p>
      <p>Our sensitivity analyses show that palaeotemperature estimates are most
sensitive to albedo (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>), which is unknown for the
pre-historic period. Surficial debris lowers the albedo of ice, but can act
to enhance or reduce surface melt on glaciers depending on the thickness of
the debris layer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.128"/>, which in turn is dictated by sediment
availability. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.129"/> measured ice ablation rates of
clean and tephra-covered snow on Summit Plateau at Mt Ruapehu and found that
tephra thicknesses of up to 7 cm enhanced ablation rates, relative to that of
clean snow. In temperate regions, empirical observations have shown that
tephra deposited on glacier surfaces is quickly redistributed by surface
runoff and thus has a net long-term effect of enhanced surface ablation
following deposition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.130"/>. Thus, the presence of
thin (centimetre-scale) debris cover on some LGM glaciers in the central North Island may
have enhanced ablation and would cause underestimation of palaeotemperatures
for these catchments in our model that assumes clean glacier surfaces. This
process may contribute to the inter-catchment and/or inter-volcano
variability in our LGM palaeotemperature estimates.</p>
      <p>Despite these possible sources of uncertainty, the weight of evidence
afforded by our multi-catchment approach allows us to say with reasonable
confidence that LGM temperatures in the central North Island reached at least 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C colder than present. Meanwhile it is unlikely that temperatures
were depressed by more than 7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C relative to today. This is in good
agreement with other quantitative LGM temperature reconstructions from New
Zealand (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx90" id="altparen.131"/>; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>), which supports our conclusion that climate represents
the dominant signal recorded by the Quaternary moraine record on the central
North Island volcanoes. In the next section we discuss our finding in the
context of other palaeoclimate records.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <title>Last Glacial Maximum climate in New Zealand</title>
      <p>The glacier modelling experiments presented here suggest that stadial
conditions in the central North Island during the LGM were characterised by
temperatures 4 to 7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C lower than present (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>),
although most of the catchments studied require cooling of ca. 5.1–6.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to achieve the mapped ice limits, when precipitation is unchanged
from present. Quantitative estimates of regional changes in precipitation
rate during the LGM remain poorly constrained, although evidence from climate
modelling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx83" id="paren.132"/>, previous glacier modelling
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.133"/>, carbon isotopes in speleothems
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102" id="paren.134"/>, and diatoms in maar deposits <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91" id="paren.135"/>
indicates that drier than present conditions prevailed across New Zealand at
this time. Precipitation reductions of up to 25 % from present require
additional decreases in temperature by up to 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to achieve the LGM
glacial geometries in the central North Island (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). Such a
change in precipitation is likely a maximum estimate given that climate model
simulations predict changes in total annual precipitation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % (e.g.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="altparen.136"/>).</p>
      <p>Steady-state equilibrium line altitudes of the simulated LGM glaciers fall
between ca. 1400 and 1650 m a.s.l. (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>), which represent
depressions of ca. 800–1100 m, relative to present. Despite methodological
differences, our estimate using physically based modelling is in agreement
with that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.137"/>, who manually reconstructed the
LGM ELAs on Mt Ruapehu to be 1500–1600 m a.s.l. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.138"/>
estimated the ELA of the LGM glacier in the MPO catchment as ca. 1400–1550 m a.s.l., using the accumulation area ratio (AAR) and maximum elevation of lateral
moraine (MELM) methods, which agrees well with the model simulation presented
here (ca. 1510 m a.s.l., Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). This good agreement between model
and manual reconstruction of glacier ELAs echoes previous similar findings
(e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx22" id="altparen.139"/>), demonstrating the utility of
simple ELA reconstructions for efficient extraction of palaeoclimate data
from moraine records.</p>
      <p>Lowering of the regional ELA to 1500 m a.s.l. at the LGM is insufficient to
promote widespread glaciation in the mountain ranges elsewhere in the North
Island, as few other peaks exceed this elevation. The only other existing
evidence for LGM glaciation in the North Island comes from the Tararua Range
in the southern North Island, where the local <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ELA was estimated to be ca.
1100 m a.s.l. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.140"/>. This <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ELA reconstruction
is considerably lower than our reconstruction and those from elsewhere in New
Zealand <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.141"/>, which may represent
topo-climatic controls on mass balance of this former cirque glacier, such as
wind-driven snow accumulation. The absence of extant glaciers in the Tararua
Range precludes robust spatial comparison of ELA depressions to the results
presented here. Quantitative palaeotemperature estimates from the North Island
have been made using fossil pollen assemblages and groundwater noble gas
palaeothermometry, which also indicate LGM temperature depressions of 4–7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C below present
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx103 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx90" id="paren.142"/>,
which is consistent with our glacier model results.</p>
      <p>Several glacier-based assessments of LGM temperature have previously been
made for the South Island, New Zealand, using a variety of different glacier
models. Simulations of the entire Southern Alps ice field, using a degree-day
model coupled to the Parallel Ice Sheet Model, indicate that the LGM was
characterised by temperatures 6–6.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C colder than present, coupled
with a reduction in precipitation of up to ca. 25 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.143"/>.
It is notable that the best-estimate palaeotemperature scenarios did not
achieve a good fit between modelled ice extent and the geological evidence in
all catchments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="altparen.144"/>, their Fig. 10b), which may also
reflect some of the uncertainties discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS2"/> above.
Using a different glacier model with higher grid resolution and a different
representation of modern climate, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="text.145"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.146"/> achieve a good model fit in one region where
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.147"/> did not (e.g. Rakaia), despite using a similar
temperature forcing (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.25 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). Using the
University of Maine Ice Sheet Model, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="text.148"/> find that a
cooling of 6.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (with no precipitation change) is
required to generate an ice extent that matches well-dated moraines in the
Lake Ohau catchment. When precipitation is reduced by 30 %, the required
cooling increases to 6.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. These studies have shown that, despite
differences in boundary conditions and formulations for glacier flow, glacier
model experiments consistently suggest peak stadial air temperatures during
the LGM were 6–7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C cooler in the Southern Alps, which is in good
agreement with our estimates from the central North Island.</p><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{-3mm}}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Simulations of nine glaciers in the central North Island, New Zealand, using a 2-D,
coupled energy balance–ice flow model, suggest that local air temperatures
were depressed by 4–7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C relative to present during the Last Glacial
Maximum. The spread of temperature estimates between catchments primarily
reflects uncertainties in dating and model parameters; however, the weight of
evidence afforded by our multi-catchment study provides a best estimate LGM
temperature depression of 5.1–6.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C below present. A decrease in
precipitation (as suggested by proxy evidence and climate models) of up to 25 % from present increases the magnitude of the required temperature changes
by up to ca. 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p>
      <p>Accounting for volcanically induced, post-glacial topographic change
generally decreases the elevation of the glacier bed elevation, which
increases the magnitude of cooling required to simulate the former ice
limits. The imposed topographic changes do not result in altered glacial
drainage patterns, although the difficulty in reconstructing pre-erosional
topographies makes it hard to fully assess this possibility. The impact of
topographic change on the palaeotemperature reconstructions is variable
between catchments, with changes on the order of 0.1–0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, relative
to the simulations with present-day land surface.</p>
      <p>Overall, our palaeoclimatic reconstructions are in good agreement with
proximal temperature reconstructions from pollen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.149"/> and
groundwater <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.150"/>, as well as several similar model-based
estimates from glacial records in the central Southern Alps
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx84" id="paren.151"/>. This growing body of
evidence indicates that air temperatures across New Zealand were depressed by
ca. 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C relative to present during the Last Glacial Maximum.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>S. R. Eaves was supported by the Victoria University Doctoral Scholarship, a
VUW Faculty Strategic Research Grant, and the Antarctic Research Centre
Endowed Development Fund.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: A. Lorrey</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Alloway et al.(2007)Alloway, Lowe, Barrell, Newnham,
Almond, Augustinus, Bertler, Carter, Litchfield,
McGlone, Shulmeister, Vandergoes, Williams
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Alloway, B. V., Lowe, D. J., Barrell, D. J. A., Newnham, R. M.,
Almond, P. C., Augustinus, P. C., Bertler, N. A. N., Carter,
L., Litchfield, N. J., McGlone, M. S., Shulmeister, J.,
Vandergoes, M. J., Williams, P. W., and NZ-INTIMATE members: Towards a climate
event stratigraphy for New Zealand over the past 30 000 years
(NZ-INTIMATE project), J. Quaternary Sci., 22, 9–35, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Anderson and Mackintosh(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, B. and Mackintosh, A.: Temperature change is the major
driver of late-glacial and Holocene glacier fluctuations in New
Zealand, Geology, 34, 121–124, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Anderson and Mackintosh(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, B. and Mackintosh, A.: Controls on mass balance
sensitivity of maritime glaciers in the Southern Alps, New
Zealand: The role of debris cover, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 117, F01003, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JF002064</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Anderson et al.(2010)Anderson, Mackintosh, Stumm,
George, Kerr, Winter Billington, and
Fitzsimons</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, B., Mackintosh, A., Stumm, D., George, L., Kerr,
T., Winter Billington, A., and Fitzsimons, S.: Climate
sensitivity of a high-precipitation glacier in New Zealand,
J. Glaciol., 56, 114–128, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Anderson et al.(2016)Anderson, Mackintosh, Oerlemans, Mullan,
Zammit, and Sood</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, B. A., Mackintosh, A. N., Oerlemans, J., Mullan, B., Zammit, C., and
Sood, A.: Modeled response of debris-covered and lake-calving glaciers to
warming, Southern Alps, New Zealand, in preparation, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Barrell(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Barrell, D. J. A.: Quaternary glaciers of New Zealand, in:
Developments in Quaternary Science, edited by: Ehlers, J.,
Gibbard, P., and Hughes, P., Elsevier,
Amsterdam, the Netherlands, vol. 15, 1047–1064, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Barrell et al.(2013)Barrell, Almond, Vandergoes,
Lowe, and Newnham</label><mixed-citation>
Barrell, D. J. A., Almond, P. C., Vandergoes, M. J., Lowe,
D. J., and Newnham, R. M.: A composite pollen-based stratotype for
inter-regional evaluation of climatic events in New Zealand over the
past 30 000 years (NZ-INTIMATE
project), Quaternary Sci. Rev., 74, 4–20, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Blard et al.(2007)Blard, Lavé, Pik, Wagnon,
and Bourlès</label><mixed-citation>
Blard, P.-H., Lavé, J., Pik, R., Wagnon, P., and
Bourlès, D.: Persistence of full glacial conditions in the
central Pacific until 15 000 years ago, Nature, 449, 591–594,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Brook et al.(2005)Brook, Purdie, and Crow</label><mixed-citation>
Brook, M. S., Purdie, H. L., and Crow, T. V.: Valley cross-profile morphology
and glaciation in Park Valley, Tararua Range, New
Zealand, J. Roy. Soc. New Zealand, 35, 399–407, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Brook et al.(2008)Brook, Shulmeister, Crow, and
Zondervan</label><mixed-citation>Brook, M. S., Shulmeister, J., Crow, T. V. H., and Zondervan,
A.: First cosmogenic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be constraints on LGM
glaciation on New Zealand's North Island: Park
Valley, Tararua Range, J. Quaternary Sci.,
23, 707–712, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Christenson et al.(2010)Christenson, Reyes, Young, Moebis, Sherburn,
Cole-Baker, and Britten</label><mixed-citation>
Christenson, B., Reyes, A., Young, R., Moebis, A., Sherburn, S., Cole-Baker,
J., and Britten, K.: Cyclic processes and factors leading to phreatic
eruption events: Insights from the 25 September 2007 eruption through
Ruapehu Crater Lake, New Zealand, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 191, 15–32, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Clark et al.(2009)Clark, Dyke, Shakun, Carlson,
Clark, Wohlfarth, Mitrovica, Hostetler, and
McCabe</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, P. U., Dyke, A. S., Shakun, J. D., Carlson, A. E.,
Clark, J., Wohlfarth, B., Mitrovica, J. X., Hostetler, S. W.,
and McCabe, A. M.: The Last Glacial Maximum,
Science, 325, 710–714, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Clarke et al.(1989)Clarke, Cross, and
Benson</label><mixed-citation>
Clarke, G. K., Cross, G. M., and Benson, C. S.: Radar imaging
of glaciovolcanic stratigraphy, Mount Wrangell caldera, Alaska:
interpretation model and results, J. Geophys. Res.-Ea., 94, 7237–7249, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Cole(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, J. W.: Andesites of the Tongariro Volcanic Centre,
North Island, New Zealand, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 3, 121–153, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Columbus et al.(2011)Columbus, Sirguey, and Tenzer</label><mixed-citation>
Columbus, J., Sirguey, P., and Tenzer, R.: A free, fully accessible 15-m
DEM for New Zealand, Survey Quarterly, 66, 16–19, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Conway et al.(2015)Conway, Townsend, Leonard, Wilson, Calvert, and
Gamble</label><mixed-citation>
Conway, C., Townsend, D., Leonard, G., Wilson, C., Calvert, A., and Gamble, J.:
Lava-ice interaction on a large composite volcano: a case study from
Ruapehu, New Zealand, B. Volcanol., 77, 1–18, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Conway et al.(2016)Conway, Leonard, Townsend, Calvert, Wilson,
Gamble, and Eaves</label><mixed-citation>Conway, C. E., Leonard, G. S., Townsend, D. B., Calvert, A., Wilson, C. J. N.,
Gamble, J., and Eaves, S. R.: A high-resolution <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ar/<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>39</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ar
lava chronology and edifice construction history for Ruapehu volcano,
New Zealand., Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal
Research, in review, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Corripio(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Corripio, J. G.: Vectorial algebra algorithms for calculating terrain
parameters from DEMs and solar radiation modelling in mountainous
terrain, International Journal of Geographical Information
Science, 17, 1–23, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Cronin and Neall(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Cronin, S. J. and Neall, V. E.: A late quaternary stratigraphic
framework for the northeastern Ruapehu and eastern Tongariro ring
plains, New Zealand, New Zeal. J. Geol. Geop., 40, 185–197, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Cuffey and Paterson(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Cuffey, K. and Paterson, W.: The physics of glaciers,
Butterworth-Heinemann/Elsevier, Burlington, USA, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Donoghue et al.(1997)Donoghue, Neall, Palmer, and
Stewart</label><mixed-citation>
Donoghue, S., Neall, V., Palmer, A., and Stewart, R.: The
volcanic history of Ruapehu during the past 2 millennia based on the
record of Tufa Trig tephras, B. Volcanol., 59,
136–146, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Doughty et al.(2013)Doughty, Anderson, Mackintosh, Kaplan,
Vandergoes, Barrell, Denton, Schaefer, Chinn, and Putnam</label><mixed-citation>
Doughty, A. M., Anderson, B. M., Mackintosh, A. N., Kaplan, M. R., Vandergoes,
M. J., Barrell, D. J. A., Denton, G. H., Schaefer, J. M., Chinn, T. J. H.,
and Putnam, A. E.: Evaluation of Lateglacial temperatures in the
Southern Alps of New Zealand based on glacier modelling at
Irishman Stream, Ben Ohau Range, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 74, 160–169, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Drost et al.(2007)Drost, Renwick, Bhaskaran,
Oliver, and McGregor</label><mixed-citation>
Drost, F., Renwick, J., Bhaskaran, B., Oliver, H., and
McGregor, J.: A simulation of New Zealand's climate
during the Last Glacial Maximum, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 26, 2505–2525, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Eaves(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Eaves, S. R.: The glacial history of Tongariro and Ruapehu volcanoes,
New Zealand, PhD thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Eaves et al.(2015)Eaves, Winckler, Schaefer, Vandergoes, Alloway,
Mackintosh, Townsend, Ryan, and Li</label><mixed-citation>Eaves, S. R., Winckler, G., Schaefer, J. M., Vandergoes, M. J., Alloway, B. V.,
Mackintosh, A. N., Townsend, D. B., Ryan, M. T., and Li, X.: A test of the
cosmogenic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>He production rate in the south west Pacific
(39<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), J. Quaternary Sci., 30, 87–97, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Eaves et al.(2016)Eaves, Mackintosh, Winckler, Schaefer, Alloway, and
Townsend</label><mixed-citation>Eaves, S. R., Mackintosh, A. N., Winckler, G., Schaefer, J. M., Alloway, B. V.,
and Townsend, D. B.: A cosmogenic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>He chronology of glacier
fluctuations in North Island, New Zealand (39<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>§)
during the last glacial cycle, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 132, 40–56, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Gamble et al.(2003)Gamble, Price, Smith, McIntosh, and
Dunbar</label><mixed-citation>Gamble, J. A., Price, R. C., Smith, I. E., McIntosh, W. C., and Dunbar, N. W.:
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ar/<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>39</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ar geochronology of magmatic activity, magma flux
and hazards at Ruapehu volcano, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New
Zealand, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.,
120, 271–287, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Golledge et al.(2012)Golledge, Mackintosh, Anderson,
Buckley, Doughty, Barrell, Denton, Vandergoes,
Andersen, and Schaefer</label><mixed-citation>
Golledge, N. R., Mackintosh, A. N., Anderson, B. M., Buckley,
K. M., Doughty, A. M., Barrell, D. J. A., Denton, G. H.,
Vandergoes, M. J., Andersen, B. G., and Schaefer, J. M.: Last
Glacial Maximum climate in New Zealand inferred from a
modelled Southern Alps icefield, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 46, 30–45, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Gudmundsson et al.(1997)Gudmundsson, Sigmundsson, and
Björnsson</label><mixed-citation>
Gudmundsson, M. T., Sigmundsson, F., and Björnsson, H.: Ice–volcano
interaction of the 1996 Gjálp subglacial eruption,
Vatnajökull, Iceland, Nature, 389, 954–957, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Hackett and Houghton(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Hackett, W. R. and Houghton, B. F.: A facies model for a quaternary
andesitic composite volcano: Ruapehu, New Zealand, B. Volcanol., 51, 51–68, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Hargreaves et al.(2012)Hargreaves, Annan, Yoshimori,
and Abe Ouchi</label><mixed-citation>Hargreaves, J. C., Annan, J. D., Yoshimori, M., and Abe
Ouchi, A.: Can the Last Glacial Maximum constrain climate
sensitivity?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L24702, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053872" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL053872</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Hendrikx and Hreinsson(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Hendrikx, J. and Hreinsson, E.: The potential impact of climate change on
seasonal snow in New Zealand: part II – industry vulnerability and
future snowmaking potential, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 110,
619–630, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Hirst et al.(2012)Hirst, Christenson, and Cole-Baker</label><mixed-citation>
Hirst, T., Christenson, B., and Cole-Baker, J.: Use of a weather buoy to derive
improved heat and mass balance parameters forRuapehu Crater Lake,
J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 235, 23–28, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Hobden et al.(1996)Hobden, Houghton, Lanphere, and
Nairn</label><mixed-citation>
Hobden, B. J., Houghton, B. F., Lanphere, M. A., and Nairn,
I. A.: Growth of the Tongariro volcanic complex: New evidence
from K-Ar age determinations, New Zeal. J.
Geol. Geop., 39, 151–154, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Houghton et al.(1987)Houghton, Latter, and
Hackett</label><mixed-citation>
Houghton, B., Latter, J., and Hackett, W.: Volcanic hazard
assessment for Ruapehu composite volcano, Taupo volcanic zone,
New Zealand, B. Volcanol., 49, 737–751, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Hutter(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
Hutter, K.: Theoretical glaciology: material science of ice and the
mechanics of glaciers and ice sheets, Reidel, Hingham, Massachusetts, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Huybers and Eisenman(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Huybers, P. and Eisenman, A.: Integrated summer insolation
calculations, NOAA/NCDC Paleoclimatology
Program, Data Contribution Series no.2006-079, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Kalnay et al.(1996)Kalnay, Kanamitsu, Kistler,
Collins, Deaven, Gandin, Iredell, Saha, White,
Woollen et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W.,
Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G.,
Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C.,
Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR
40-year reanalysis project, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 77, 437–471, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Kaplan et al.(2010)Kaplan, Schaefer, Denton,
Barrell, Chinn, Putnam, Andersen, Finkel, Schwartz,
and Doughty</label><mixed-citation>
Kaplan, M. R., Schaefer, J. M., Denton, G. H., Barrell, D.
J. A., Chinn, T. J. H., Putnam, A. E., Andersen, B. G.,
Finkel, R. C., Schwartz, R., and Doughty, A. M.: Glacier
retreat in New Zealand during the Younger Dryas stadial,
Nature, 467, 194–197, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Kessler et al.(2006)Kessler, Anderson, and
Stock</label><mixed-citation>Kessler, M. A., Anderson, R. S., and Stock, G. M.: Modeling
topographic and climatic control of east-west asymmetry in Sierra
Nevada glacier length during the Last Glacial
Maximum, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 111, F02002, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JF000365" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JF000365</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Keys(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Keys, H.: 1988 Survey of the glaciers on Mt. Ruapehu,
Tongariro National Park - A baseline for detecting effects of
climate change, Tech. Rep. Science and Research Internal
Report No.24, Department of Conservation, Wellington,
New Zealand, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Kirkbride and Dugmore(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Kirkbride, M. P. and Dugmore, A. J.: Timing and significance of
mid-Holocene glacier advances in Northern and Central
Iceland, J. Quaternary Sci., 16, 145–153, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Kirkbride and Dugmore(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Kirkbride, M. P. and Dugmore, A. J.: Glaciological response to
distal tephra fallout from the 1947 eruption of Hekla, south
Iceland, J. Glaciol., 49, 420–428, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Klok and Oerlemans(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Klok, E. and Oerlemans, J.: Model study of the spatial distribution
of the energy and mass balance of Morteratschgletscher,
Switzerland, J. Glaciol., 48, 505–518, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Konzelmann et al.(1994)Konzelmann, van de Wal,
Greuell, Bintanja, Henneken, and Abe
Ouchi</label><mixed-citation>
Konzelmann, T., van de Wal, R. S., Greuell, W., Bintanja, R.,
Henneken, E. A., and Abe Ouchi, A.: Parameterization of
global and longwave incoming radiation for the Greenland Ice
Sheet, Global Planet. change, 9, 143–164, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Krenek(1959)</label><mixed-citation>
Krenek, L.: Changes in the glaciers of Mt Ruapehu in 1955,
New Zeal. J. Geol. Geop., 2,
643–653, 1959.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Kuhn(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Kuhn, M.: The mass balance of very small glaciers, Zeitschrift für
Gletscherkunde und Glazialgeologie, 31, 171–179, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Le Meur et al.(2004)Le Meur, Gagliardini,
Zwinger, and Ruokolainen</label><mixed-citation>
Le Meur, E., Gagliardini, O., Zwinger, T., and Ruokolainen,
J.: Glacier flow modelling: a comparison of the Shallow Ice
Approximation and the full-Stokes solution, C. R. Phys., 5, 709–722, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Leysinger Vieli and
Gudmundsson(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Leysinger Vieli, G. and Gudmundsson, G.: On estimating length
fluctuations of glaciers caused by changes in climatic forcing, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 109, F01007, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JF000027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JF000027</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Licciardi et al.(2007)Licciardi, Kurz, and
Curtice</label><mixed-citation>Licciardi, J. M., Kurz, M. D., and Curtice, J. M.: Glacial
and volcanic history of Icelandic table mountains from cosmogenic
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>He exposure ages, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 26,
1529–1546, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Liston and Sturm(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Liston, G. E. and Sturm, M.: A snow-transport model for complex terrain,
J. Glaciol., 44, 498–516, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Lorrey et al.(2012)Lorrey, Vandergoes, Almond,
Renwick, Stephens, Bostock, Mackintosh, Newnham,
Williams, Ackerley, Neil, and Fowler</label><mixed-citation>
Lorrey, A. M., Vandergoes, M., Almond, P., Renwick, J.,
Stephens, T., Bostock, H., Mackintosh, A., Newnham, R. M.,
Williams, P. W., Ackerley, D., Neil, H., and Fowler, A. M.:
Palaeocirculation across New Zealand during the last glacial
maximum at 21 ka, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 36, 189–213, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Mackintosh et al.(2002)Mackintosh, Dugmore, and
Hubbard</label><mixed-citation>
Mackintosh, A. N., Dugmore, A. J., and Hubbard, A. L.: Holocene
climatic changes in Iceland: evidence from modelling glacier length
fluctuations at Sólheimajökull, Quatern.
Int., 91, 39–52, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Mathews(1967)</label><mixed-citation>
Mathews, W. H.: A contribution to the geology of the Mount
Tongariro massif, North Island, New Zealand, New
Zeal. J. Geol. Geop., 10, 1027–1038,
1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>McArthur and Shepherd(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
McArthur, J. L. and Shepherd, M. J.: Late Quaternary
glaciation of Mt Ruapehu, North Island, New Zealand,
J. Roy. Soc. New Zeal., 20, 287–296,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>McCarthy et al.(2008)McCarthy, Mackintosh,
Rieser, and Fink</label><mixed-citation>
McCarthy, A., Mackintosh, A., Rieser, U., and Fink, D.:
Mountain glacier chronology from Boulder Lake, New
Zealand, indicates MIS 4 and MIS 2 ice advances
of similar extent, Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res.,
40, 695–708, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>McClelland and Erwin(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
McClelland, E. and Erwin, P. S.: Was a dacite dome implicated in the 9 500 BP
collapse of Mt Ruapehu? A palaeomagnetic investigation, B. Volcanol., 65, 294–305, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>McGlone and Topping(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
McGlone, M. and Topping, W. .: Aranuian (post-glacial) pollen diagrams from the
Tongariro region, North Island, New Zealand, New Zeal.
J. Bot., 15, 749–760, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>McKinnon et al.(2012)McKinnon, Mackintosh,
Anderson, and Barrell</label><mixed-citation>
McKinnon, K. A., Mackintosh, A. N., Anderson, B. M., and
Barrell, D. J. A.: The influence of sub-glacial bed evolution on ice
extent: A model-based evaluation of the Last Glacial Maximum
Pukaki glacier, New Zealand, Quaternary Sci.
Rev., 57, 46–57, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Mitchell(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Mitchell, W. A.: Significance of snowblow in the generation of Loch
Lomond Stadial (Younger Dryas) glaciers in the western
Pennines, northern England, J. Quaternary Sci., 11,
233–248, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Moebis et al.(2011)Moebis, Cronin, Neall, and Smith</label><mixed-citation>
Moebis, A., Cronin, S. J., Neall, V. E., and Smith, I. E.: Unravelling a
complex volcanic history from fine-grained, intricate Holocene ash sequences
at the Tongariro Volcanic Centre, New Zealand, Quatern.
Int., 246, 352–363, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Monnin et al.(2001)Monnin, Indermühle, Dällenbach,
Flückiger, Stauffer, Stocker, Raynaud, and
Barnola</label><mixed-citation>Monnin, E., Indermühle, A., Dällenbach, A., Flückiger, J.,
Stauffer, B., Stocker, T. F., Raynaud, D., and Barnola, J. .:
Atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations over the last glacial termination,
Science, 291, 112–114, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Newnham et al.(2007)Newnham, Lowe, Giles, and
Alloway</label><mixed-citation>
Newnham, R. M., Lowe, D. J., Giles, T., and Alloway, B. V.:
Vegetation and climate of Auckland, New Zealand, since ca. 32 000 cal. yr ago: Support for an extended LGM,
J. Quaternary Sci., 22, 517–534, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Newnham et al.(2013)Newnham, McGlone, Moar,
Wilmshurst, and Vandergoes</label><mixed-citation>
Newnham, R. M., McGlone, M., Moar, N., Wilmshurst, J., and
Vandergoes, M.: The vegetation cover of New Zealand at the
Last Glacial Maximum, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 74,
202–214, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>NIWA(2014)</label><mixed-citation>NIWA: CliFlo: NIWA's National Climate
Database on the Web, available at: <uri>http://cliflo.niwa.co.nz/</uri>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Norton(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Norton, D. A.: A multivariate technique for estimating New
Zealand temperature normals, Weather and Climate, 5, 64–74,
1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Oerlemans(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Oerlemans, J.: Climate sensitivity of glaciers in southern
Norway: application of an energy-balance model to Nigardsbreen,
Hellstugubreen and Alfotbreen, J. Glaciol., 38,
223–232, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Oerlemans(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Oerlemans, J.: Climate sensitivity of Franz Josef Glacier,
New Zealand, as revealed by numerical modeling, Arctic Alpine Res., 29, 233–239, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Osborn et al.(2012)Osborn, Menounos, Ryane,
Riedel, Clague, Koch, Clark, Scott, and
Davis</label><mixed-citation>
Osborn, G., Menounos, B., Ryane, C., Riedel, J., Clague,
J. J., Koch, J., Clark, D., Scott, K., and Davis, P. T.:
Latest pleistocene and holocene glacier fluctuations on Mount
Baker, Washington, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 49,
33–51, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Östrem(1959)</label><mixed-citation>
Östrem, G.: Ice melting under a thin layer of moraine, and the existence of
ice cores in moraine ridges, Geogr. Ann., 41, 228–230, 1959.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Palmer and Neall(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Palmer, B. and Neall, V.: The Murimotu Formation - 9500
year old deposits of a debris avalanche and associated lahars, Mount
Ruapehu, North Island, New Zealand, New Zeal.
J. Geol. Geop., 32, 477–486, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Paterson(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Paterson, W. S. B.: The Physics of Glaciers, Elsevier, Oxford,
New York, USA and Tokyo, Japan, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Paulin(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Paulin, T.: Glaciers and Climate Change, Mount Ruapehu,
New Zealand, Master's thesis, Victoria University of
Wellington, New Zealand, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Plummer and Phillips(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Plummer, M. A. and Phillips, F. M.: A 2-D numerical model of snow/ice
energy balance and ice flow for paleoclimatic interpretation of glacial
geomorphic features, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 22, 1389–1406, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Porter(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
Porter, S. C.: Equilibrium-line altitudes of late Quaternary
glaciers in the Southern Alps, New Zealand, Quaternary
Res., 5, 27–47, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Price et al.(2012)Price, Gamble, Smith, Maas,
Waight, Stewart, and Woodhead</label><mixed-citation>
Price, R. C., Gamble, J. A., Smith, I. E., Maas, R.,
Waight, T., Stewart, R. B., and Woodhead, J.: The anatomy of
an Andesite volcano: a time–stratigraphic study of andesite petrogenesis
and crustal evolution at Ruapehu Volcano, New Zealand,
J. Petrol., 53, 2139–2189, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Putnam et al.(2013a)Putnam, Schaefer,
Denton, Barrell, Andersen, Koffman, Rowan, Finkel,
Rood, Schwartz, Vandergoes, Plummer, Brocklehurst,
Kelley, and Ladig</label><mixed-citation>
Putnam, A. E., Schaefer, J. M., Denton, G. H., Barrell, D.
J. A., Andersen, B. G., Koffman, T. N. B., Rowan, A. V.,
Finkel, R. C., Rood, D. H., Schwartz, R., Vandergoes, M. J.,
Plummer, M. A., Brocklehurst, S. H., Kelley, S. E., and
Ladig, K. L.: Warming and glacier recession in the Rakaia valley,
Southern Alps of New Zealand, during Heinrich Stadial
1, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 382, 98–110,
2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Putnam et al.(2013b)Putnam, Schaefer,
Denton, Barrell, Birkel, Andersen, Kaplan, Finkel,
Schwartz, and Doughty</label><mixed-citation>Putnam, A. E., Schaefer, J. M., Denton, G. H., Barrell, D.
J. A., Birkel, S. D., Andersen, B. G., Kaplan, M. R., Finkel,
R. C., Schwartz, R., and Doughty, A. M.: The Last Glacial
Maximum at 44<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S documented by a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be moraine
chronology at Lake Ohau, Southern Alps of New
Zealand, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 62, 114–141,
2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Rea et al.(1999)Rea, Whalley, Dixon, and Gordon</label><mixed-citation>
Rea, B. R., Whalley, W. B., Dixon, T. S., and Gordon, J. E.: Plateau icefields
as contributing areas to valley glaciers and the potential impact on
reconstructed ELAs: a case study from the Lyngen Alps, North
Norway, Ann. Glaciol., 28, 97–102, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Richardson and Brook(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, J. M. and Brook, M. S.: Ablation of debris-covered ice: some
effects of the 25 September 2007 Mt Ruapehu eruption, J. Roy. Soc. of New Zeal., 40, 45–55, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Rivera and Bown(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Rivera, A. and Bown, F.: Recent glacier variations on active ice capped
volcanoes in the Southern Volcanic Zone (37–46<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), Chilean Andes, J. S. Am. Earth Sci., 45,
345–356, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Rivera et al.(2012)Rivera, Bown, Carrión, and
Zenteno</label><mixed-citation>Rivera, A., Bown, F., Carrión, D., and Zenteno, P.: Glacier responses to
recent volcanic activity in Southern Chile, Environ. Res.
Lett., 7, 014036, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014036</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Rojas et al.(2009)Rojas, Moreno, Kageyama,
Crucifix, Hewitt, Abe Ouchi, Ohgaito, Brady, and
Hope</label><mixed-citation>
Rojas, M., Moreno, P., Kageyama, M., Crucifix, M., Hewitt,
C., Abe Ouchi, A., Ohgaito, R., Brady, E. C., and Hope,
P.: The Southern Westerlies during the last glacial maximum in
PMIP2 simulations, Clim. Dynam., 32, 525–548,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Rowan et al.(2013)Rowan, Plummer, Brocklehurst,
Jones, and Schultz</label><mixed-citation>
Rowan, A. V., Plummer, M. A., Brocklehurst, S. H., Jones,
M. A., and Schultz, D. M.: Drainage capture and discharge variations
driven by glaciation in the Southern Alps, New Zealand,
Geology, 41, 199–202, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Rowan et al.(2014)Rowan, Brocklehurst, Schultz,
Plummer, Anderson, and Glasser</label><mixed-citation>
Rowan, A. V., Brocklehurst, S. H., Schultz, D. M., Plummer,
M. A., Anderson, L. S., and Glasser, N. F.: Late Quaternary
glacier sensitivity to temperature and precipitation distribution in the
Southern Alps of New Zealand, J. Geophys.
Res.-Earth, 24,  1064–1081, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Sandiford et al.(2003)Sandiford, Newnham, Alloway,
and Ogden</label><mixed-citation>
Sandiford, A., Newnham, R. M., Alloway, B. V., and Ogden, J.:
A 28 000–7600 cal yr BP pollen record of vegetation and climate
change from Pukaki Crater, northern New Zealand,
Palaeogeogr. Palaeoecol., 201, 235–247,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Schaefer et al.(2006)Schaefer, Denton, Barrell,
Ivy Ochs, Kubik, Andersen, Phillips, Lowell, and
Schlüchter</label><mixed-citation>
Schaefer, J. M., Denton, G. H., Barrell, D. J. A., Ivy
Ochs, S., Kubik, P. W., Andersen, B. G., Phillips, F. M.,
Lowell, T. V., and Schlüchter, C.: Near-synchronous
interhemispheric termination of the Last Glacial Maximum in
mid-latitudes, Science, 312, 1510–1513, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Schaefer et al.(2015)Schaefer, Putnam, Denton, Kaplan, Birkel,
Doughty, Kelley, Barrell, Finkel, Winckler et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Schaefer, J. M., Putnam, A. E., Denton, G. H., Kaplan, M. R., Birkel, S.,
Doughty, A. M., Kelley, S., Barrell, D. J., Finkel, R. C., Winckler, G.,
et al.: The Southern Glacial Maximum 65 000 years ago and its
unfinished termination, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 114, 52–60, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Schmittner et al.(2011)Schmittner, Urban, Shakun,
Mahowald, Clark, Bartlein, Mix, and Rosell
Melé</label><mixed-citation>
Schmittner, A., Urban, N. M., Shakun, J. D., Mahowald, N. M.,
Clark, P. U., Bartlein, P. J., Mix, A. C., and Rosell
Melé, A.: Climate sensitivity estimated from temperature
reconstructions of the Last Glacial Maximum, Science, 334,
1385–1388, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Seltzer et al.(2015)Seltzer, Stute, Morgernstern, Stewart, and
Schaefer</label><mixed-citation>Seltzer, A. M., Stute, M., Morgernstern, U., Stewart, M. K., and Schaefer,
J. M.: Mean annual temperature in New Zealand during the last glacial
maximum derived from dissolved noble gases in groundwater, Earth
Planet. Sci. Lett., 431, 206–216, 2015.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Stephens et al.(2012)Stephens, Atkin, Cochran,
Augustinus, Reid, Lorrey, Shane, and Street
Perrott</label><mixed-citation>
Stephens, T., Atkin, D., Cochran, U., Augustinus, P., Reid,
M., Lorrey, A., Shane, P., and Street Perrott, A.: A
diatom-inferred record of reduced effective precipitation during the Last
Glacial Coldest Phase (28.8–18.0 cal kyr BP) and
increasing Holocene seasonality at Lake Pupuke, Auckland,
New Zealand, J. Paleolimnol., 48, 801–817, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Stipp(1968)</label><mixed-citation>
Stipp, J. J.: The geochronology and petrogenesis of the Cenovoic
volcanics of the North Island, New Zealand, PhD
Thesis, The Australian National University,
Canberra, Australia, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Tait and Macara(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Tait, A. and Macara, G.: Evaluation of interpolated daily temperature data for
high elevation areas in New Zealand, Weather and Climate, 34, 36–49,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Tait et al.(2006)Tait, Henderson, Turner, and
Zheng</label><mixed-citation>
Tait, A., Henderson, R., Turner, R., and Zheng, X.: Thin
plate smoothing spline interpolation of daily rainfall for New
Zealand using a climatological rainfall surface, International
J. Climatol., 26, 2097–2115, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Taylor(1926)</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, G.: Notes on the glaciation of Ruapehu, Transactions of the
N.Z. Institute, 57, 235–236, 1926.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>Topping(1973)</label><mixed-citation>
Topping, W.: Tephrostratigraphy and chronology of late Quaternary eruptives
from the Tongariro Volcanic Centre, New Zealand, New
Zeal. J. Geol. Geop., 16, 397–423, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><label>Topping(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
Topping, W. W.: Some aspects of Quaternary history of Tongariro
Volcanic Centre, PhD Thesis, Victoria
University of Wellington, Wellingtion, New Zealand, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><label>Topping and Kohn(1973)</label><mixed-citation>
Topping, W. W. and Kohn, B. P.: Rhyolitic tephra marker beds in the
Tongariro area, North Island, New Zealand, New
Zeal. J. Geol. Geop., 16, 375–395,
1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><label>Townsend et al.(2008)Townsend, Vonk, and
Kamp</label><mixed-citation>Townsend, D., Vonk, A., and Kamp, P.: Geology map of the
Taranaki area: scale <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>250 000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Three maps and notes,
Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>250 000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
geological map 7. p. 77, + 1 folded map, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><label>Townsend et al.(2016)Townsend, Leonard
et al.</label><mixed-citation>Townsend, D. B., Leonard, G. S., Conway, C. E., Eaves, S. R., and Wilson, C. J. N.: Geology of the Tongariro National Park
area <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>60 000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. GNS Science Geological Map 4. 1 Sheet + monograph. Lower Hutt,
New Zealand. GNS Science., in preparation, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><label>Vandergoes et al.(2005)Vandergoes, Newnham, Preusser,
Hendy, Lowell, Fitzsimons, Hogg, Kasper, and
Schlüchter</label><mixed-citation>
Vandergoes, M. J., Newnham, R. M., Preusser, F., Hendy, C. H.,
Lowell, T. V., Fitzsimons, S. J., Hogg, A. G., Kasper, H. U.,
and Schlüchter, C.: Regional insolation forcing of Late
Quaternary climate change in the Southern Hemisphere, Nature,
436, 242–245, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><label>Whittaker et al.(2011)Whittaker, Hendy, and
Hellstrom</label><mixed-citation>
Whittaker, T. E., Hendy, C. H., and Hellstrom, J. C.: Abrupt
millennial-scale changes in intensity of Southern Hemisphere westerly
winds during marine isotope stages 2-4, Geology, 39, 455–458, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><label>Wilmshurst et al.(2007)Wilmshurst, McGlone, Leathwick, and
Newnham</label><mixed-citation>
Wilmshurst, J. M., McGlone, M. S., Leathwick, J. R., and Newnham, R. M.: A
pre-deforestation pollen-climate calibration model for New Zealand
and quantitative temperature reconstructions for the past 18 000 years BP,
J. Quaternary Sci., 22, 535–547, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The Last Glacial Maximum in the central North Island, New Zealand: palaeoclimate inferences from glacier modelling</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Quantitative palaeoclimate reconstructions provide data for evaluating the
mechanisms of past, natural climate variability. Geometries of former
mountain glaciers, constrained by moraine mapping, afford the opportunity to
reconstruct palaeoclimate, due to the close relationship between ice extent
and local climate. In this study, we present results from a series of
experiments using a 2-D coupled energy balance–ice flow model that investigate
the palaeoclimate significance of Last Glacial Maximum moraines within nine
catchments in the central North Island, New Zealand. We find that the former ice
limits can be simulated when present-day temperatures are reduced by between
4 and 7 °C, if
precipitation remains unchanged from
present. The spread in the results between the nine catchments is likely to
represent the combination of chronological and model uncertainties. The
majority of catchments targeted require temperature decreases of 5.1 to 6.3 °C to simulate the former glaciers, which represents
our best estimate of the temperature anomaly in the central North Island, New
Zealand, during the Last Glacial Maximum. A decrease in precipitation of up to
25 % from present, as suggested by proxy evidence and climate models,
increases the magnitude of the required temperature changes by up to 0.8 °C. Glacier model experiments using reconstructed topographies that
exclude the volume of post-glacial ( &lt;  15 ka) volcanism generally increased
the magnitude of cooling required to simulate the former ice limits by up to
0.5 °C. Our palaeotemperature estimates expand the spatial coverage of
proxy-based quantitative palaeoclimate reconstructions in New Zealand. Our
results are also consistent with independent, proximal temperature
reconstructions from fossil groundwater and pollen assemblages, as well as
similar glacier modelling reconstructions from the central Southern Alps, which
suggest air temperatures were ca. 6 °C lower than present across New
Zealand during the Last Glacial Maximum.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Alloway et al.(2007)Alloway, Lowe, Barrell, Newnham,
Almond, Augustinus, Bertler, Carter, Litchfield,
McGlone, Shulmeister, Vandergoes, Williams
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Alloway, B. V., Lowe, D. J., Barrell, D. J. A., Newnham, R. M.,
Almond, P. C., Augustinus, P. C., Bertler, N. A. N., Carter,
L., Litchfield, N. J., McGlone, M. S., Shulmeister, J.,
Vandergoes, M. J., Williams, P. W., and NZ-INTIMATE members: Towards a climate
event stratigraphy for New Zealand over the past 30 000 years
(NZ-INTIMATE project), J. Quaternary Sci., 22, 9–35, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Anderson and Mackintosh(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, B. and Mackintosh, A.: Temperature change is the major
driver of late-glacial and Holocene glacier fluctuations in New
Zealand, Geology, 34, 121–124, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Anderson and Mackintosh(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, B. and Mackintosh, A.: Controls on mass balance
sensitivity of maritime glaciers in the Southern Alps, New
Zealand: The role of debris cover, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 117, F01003, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002064" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011JF002064</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Anderson et al.(2010)Anderson, Mackintosh, Stumm,
George, Kerr, Winter Billington, and
Fitzsimons</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, B., Mackintosh, A., Stumm, D., George, L., Kerr,
T., Winter Billington, A., and Fitzsimons, S.: Climate
sensitivity of a high-precipitation glacier in New Zealand,
J. Glaciol., 56, 114–128, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Anderson et al.(2016)Anderson, Mackintosh, Oerlemans, Mullan,
Zammit, and Sood</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, B. A., Mackintosh, A. N., Oerlemans, J., Mullan, B., Zammit, C., and
Sood, A.: Modeled response of debris-covered and lake-calving glaciers to
warming, Southern Alps, New Zealand, in preparation, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Barrell(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Barrell, D. J. A.: Quaternary glaciers of New Zealand, in:
Developments in Quaternary Science, edited by: Ehlers, J.,
Gibbard, P., and Hughes, P., Elsevier,
Amsterdam, the Netherlands, vol. 15, 1047–1064, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Barrell et al.(2013)Barrell, Almond, Vandergoes,
Lowe, and Newnham</label><mixed-citation>
Barrell, D. J. A., Almond, P. C., Vandergoes, M. J., Lowe,
D. J., and Newnham, R. M.: A composite pollen-based stratotype for
inter-regional evaluation of climatic events in New Zealand over the
past 30 000 years (NZ-INTIMATE
project), Quaternary Sci. Rev., 74, 4–20, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Blard et al.(2007)Blard, Lavé, Pik, Wagnon,
and Bourlès</label><mixed-citation>
Blard, P.-H., Lavé, J., Pik, R., Wagnon, P., and
Bourlès, D.: Persistence of full glacial conditions in the
central Pacific until 15 000 years ago, Nature, 449, 591–594,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Brook et al.(2005)Brook, Purdie, and Crow</label><mixed-citation>
Brook, M. S., Purdie, H. L., and Crow, T. V.: Valley cross-profile morphology
and glaciation in Park Valley, Tararua Range, New
Zealand, J. Roy. Soc. New Zealand, 35, 399–407, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Brook et al.(2008)Brook, Shulmeister, Crow, and
Zondervan</label><mixed-citation>
Brook, M. S., Shulmeister, J., Crow, T. V. H., and Zondervan,
A.: First cosmogenic <sup>10</sup>Be constraints on LGM
glaciation on New Zealand's North Island: Park
Valley, Tararua Range, J. Quaternary Sci.,
23, 707–712, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Christenson et al.(2010)Christenson, Reyes, Young, Moebis, Sherburn,
Cole-Baker, and Britten</label><mixed-citation>
Christenson, B., Reyes, A., Young, R., Moebis, A., Sherburn, S., Cole-Baker,
J., and Britten, K.: Cyclic processes and factors leading to phreatic
eruption events: Insights from the 25 September 2007 eruption through
Ruapehu Crater Lake, New Zealand, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 191, 15–32, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Clark et al.(2009)Clark, Dyke, Shakun, Carlson,
Clark, Wohlfarth, Mitrovica, Hostetler, and
McCabe</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, P. U., Dyke, A. S., Shakun, J. D., Carlson, A. E.,
Clark, J., Wohlfarth, B., Mitrovica, J. X., Hostetler, S. W.,
and McCabe, A. M.: The Last Glacial Maximum,
Science, 325, 710–714, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Clarke et al.(1989)Clarke, Cross, and
Benson</label><mixed-citation>
Clarke, G. K., Cross, G. M., and Benson, C. S.: Radar imaging
of glaciovolcanic stratigraphy, Mount Wrangell caldera, Alaska:
interpretation model and results, J. Geophys. Res.-Ea., 94, 7237–7249, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Cole(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, J. W.: Andesites of the Tongariro Volcanic Centre,
North Island, New Zealand, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 3, 121–153, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Columbus et al.(2011)Columbus, Sirguey, and Tenzer</label><mixed-citation>
Columbus, J., Sirguey, P., and Tenzer, R.: A free, fully accessible 15-m
DEM for New Zealand, Survey Quarterly, 66, 16–19, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Conway et al.(2015)Conway, Townsend, Leonard, Wilson, Calvert, and
Gamble</label><mixed-citation>
Conway, C., Townsend, D., Leonard, G., Wilson, C., Calvert, A., and Gamble, J.:
Lava-ice interaction on a large composite volcano: a case study from
Ruapehu, New Zealand, B. Volcanol., 77, 1–18, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Conway et al.(2016)Conway, Leonard, Townsend, Calvert, Wilson,
Gamble, and Eaves</label><mixed-citation>
Conway, C. E., Leonard, G. S., Townsend, D. B., Calvert, A., Wilson, C. J. N.,
Gamble, J., and Eaves, S. R.: A high-resolution <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar
lava chronology and edifice construction history for Ruapehu volcano,
New Zealand., Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal
Research, in review, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Corripio(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Corripio, J. G.: Vectorial algebra algorithms for calculating terrain
parameters from DEMs and solar radiation modelling in mountainous
terrain, International Journal of Geographical Information
Science, 17, 1–23, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Cronin and Neall(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Cronin, S. J. and Neall, V. E.: A late quaternary stratigraphic
framework for the northeastern Ruapehu and eastern Tongariro ring
plains, New Zealand, New Zeal. J. Geol. Geop., 40, 185–197, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Cuffey and Paterson(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Cuffey, K. and Paterson, W.: The physics of glaciers,
Butterworth-Heinemann/Elsevier, Burlington, USA, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Donoghue et al.(1997)Donoghue, Neall, Palmer, and
Stewart</label><mixed-citation>
Donoghue, S., Neall, V., Palmer, A., and Stewart, R.: The
volcanic history of Ruapehu during the past 2 millennia based on the
record of Tufa Trig tephras, B. Volcanol., 59,
136–146, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Doughty et al.(2013)Doughty, Anderson, Mackintosh, Kaplan,
Vandergoes, Barrell, Denton, Schaefer, Chinn, and Putnam</label><mixed-citation>
Doughty, A. M., Anderson, B. M., Mackintosh, A. N., Kaplan, M. R., Vandergoes,
M. J., Barrell, D. J. A., Denton, G. H., Schaefer, J. M., Chinn, T. J. H.,
and Putnam, A. E.: Evaluation of Lateglacial temperatures in the
Southern Alps of New Zealand based on glacier modelling at
Irishman Stream, Ben Ohau Range, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 74, 160–169, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Drost et al.(2007)Drost, Renwick, Bhaskaran,
Oliver, and McGregor</label><mixed-citation>
Drost, F., Renwick, J., Bhaskaran, B., Oliver, H., and
McGregor, J.: A simulation of New Zealand's climate
during the Last Glacial Maximum, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 26, 2505–2525, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Eaves(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Eaves, S. R.: The glacial history of Tongariro and Ruapehu volcanoes,
New Zealand, PhD thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Eaves et al.(2015)Eaves, Winckler, Schaefer, Vandergoes, Alloway,
Mackintosh, Townsend, Ryan, and Li</label><mixed-citation>
Eaves, S. R., Winckler, G., Schaefer, J. M., Vandergoes, M. J., Alloway, B. V.,
Mackintosh, A. N., Townsend, D. B., Ryan, M. T., and Li, X.: A test of the
cosmogenic <sup>3</sup>He production rate in the south west Pacific
(39° S), J. Quaternary Sci., 30, 87–97, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Eaves et al.(2016)Eaves, Mackintosh, Winckler, Schaefer, Alloway, and
Townsend</label><mixed-citation>
Eaves, S. R., Mackintosh, A. N., Winckler, G., Schaefer, J. M., Alloway, B. V.,
and Townsend, D. B.: A cosmogenic <sup>3</sup>He chronology of glacier
fluctuations in North Island, New Zealand (39°§)
during the last glacial cycle, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 132, 40–56, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Gamble et al.(2003)Gamble, Price, Smith, McIntosh, and
Dunbar</label><mixed-citation>
Gamble, J. A., Price, R. C., Smith, I. E., McIntosh, W. C., and Dunbar, N. W.:
<sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar geochronology of magmatic activity, magma flux
and hazards at Ruapehu volcano, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New
Zealand, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.,
120, 271–287, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Golledge et al.(2012)Golledge, Mackintosh, Anderson,
Buckley, Doughty, Barrell, Denton, Vandergoes,
Andersen, and Schaefer</label><mixed-citation>
Golledge, N. R., Mackintosh, A. N., Anderson, B. M., Buckley,
K. M., Doughty, A. M., Barrell, D. J. A., Denton, G. H.,
Vandergoes, M. J., Andersen, B. G., and Schaefer, J. M.: Last
Glacial Maximum climate in New Zealand inferred from a
modelled Southern Alps icefield, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 46, 30–45, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Gudmundsson et al.(1997)Gudmundsson, Sigmundsson, and
Björnsson</label><mixed-citation>
Gudmundsson, M. T., Sigmundsson, F., and Björnsson, H.: Ice–volcano
interaction of the 1996 Gjálp subglacial eruption,
Vatnajökull, Iceland, Nature, 389, 954–957, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Hackett and Houghton(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Hackett, W. R. and Houghton, B. F.: A facies model for a quaternary
andesitic composite volcano: Ruapehu, New Zealand, B. Volcanol., 51, 51–68, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Hargreaves et al.(2012)Hargreaves, Annan, Yoshimori,
and Abe Ouchi</label><mixed-citation>
Hargreaves, J. C., Annan, J. D., Yoshimori, M., and Abe
Ouchi, A.: Can the Last Glacial Maximum constrain climate
sensitivity?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L24702, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053872" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2012GL053872</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Hendrikx and Hreinsson(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Hendrikx, J. and Hreinsson, E.: The potential impact of climate change on
seasonal snow in New Zealand: part II – industry vulnerability and
future snowmaking potential, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 110,
619–630, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Hirst et al.(2012)Hirst, Christenson, and Cole-Baker</label><mixed-citation>
Hirst, T., Christenson, B., and Cole-Baker, J.: Use of a weather buoy to derive
improved heat and mass balance parameters forRuapehu Crater Lake,
J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 235, 23–28, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Hobden et al.(1996)Hobden, Houghton, Lanphere, and
Nairn</label><mixed-citation>
Hobden, B. J., Houghton, B. F., Lanphere, M. A., and Nairn,
I. A.: Growth of the Tongariro volcanic complex: New evidence
from K-Ar age determinations, New Zeal. J.
Geol. Geop., 39, 151–154, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Houghton et al.(1987)Houghton, Latter, and
Hackett</label><mixed-citation>
Houghton, B., Latter, J., and Hackett, W.: Volcanic hazard
assessment for Ruapehu composite volcano, Taupo volcanic zone,
New Zealand, B. Volcanol., 49, 737–751, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Hutter(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
Hutter, K.: Theoretical glaciology: material science of ice and the
mechanics of glaciers and ice sheets, Reidel, Hingham, Massachusetts, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Huybers and Eisenman(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Huybers, P. and Eisenman, A.: Integrated summer insolation
calculations, NOAA/NCDC Paleoclimatology
Program, Data Contribution Series no.2006-079, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Kalnay et al.(1996)Kalnay, Kanamitsu, Kistler,
Collins, Deaven, Gandin, Iredell, Saha, White,
Woollen et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W.,
Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G.,
Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C.,
Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR
40-year reanalysis project, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 77, 437–471, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Kaplan et al.(2010)Kaplan, Schaefer, Denton,
Barrell, Chinn, Putnam, Andersen, Finkel, Schwartz,
and Doughty</label><mixed-citation>
Kaplan, M. R., Schaefer, J. M., Denton, G. H., Barrell, D.
J. A., Chinn, T. J. H., Putnam, A. E., Andersen, B. G.,
Finkel, R. C., Schwartz, R., and Doughty, A. M.: Glacier
retreat in New Zealand during the Younger Dryas stadial,
Nature, 467, 194–197, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Kessler et al.(2006)Kessler, Anderson, and
Stock</label><mixed-citation>
Kessler, M. A., Anderson, R. S., and Stock, G. M.: Modeling
topographic and climatic control of east-west asymmetry in Sierra
Nevada glacier length during the Last Glacial
Maximum, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 111, F02002, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JF000365" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005JF000365</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Keys(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Keys, H.: 1988 Survey of the glaciers on Mt. Ruapehu,
Tongariro National Park - A baseline for detecting effects of
climate change, Tech. Rep. Science and Research Internal
Report No.24, Department of Conservation, Wellington,
New Zealand, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Kirkbride and Dugmore(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Kirkbride, M. P. and Dugmore, A. J.: Timing and significance of
mid-Holocene glacier advances in Northern and Central
Iceland, J. Quaternary Sci., 16, 145–153, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Kirkbride and Dugmore(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Kirkbride, M. P. and Dugmore, A. J.: Glaciological response to
distal tephra fallout from the 1947 eruption of Hekla, south
Iceland, J. Glaciol., 49, 420–428, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Klok and Oerlemans(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Klok, E. and Oerlemans, J.: Model study of the spatial distribution
of the energy and mass balance of Morteratschgletscher,
Switzerland, J. Glaciol., 48, 505–518, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Konzelmann et al.(1994)Konzelmann, van de Wal,
Greuell, Bintanja, Henneken, and Abe
Ouchi</label><mixed-citation>
Konzelmann, T., van de Wal, R. S., Greuell, W., Bintanja, R.,
Henneken, E. A., and Abe Ouchi, A.: Parameterization of
global and longwave incoming radiation for the Greenland Ice
Sheet, Global Planet. change, 9, 143–164, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Krenek(1959)</label><mixed-citation>
Krenek, L.: Changes in the glaciers of Mt Ruapehu in 1955,
New Zeal. J. Geol. Geop., 2,
643–653, 1959.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Kuhn(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Kuhn, M.: The mass balance of very small glaciers, Zeitschrift für
Gletscherkunde und Glazialgeologie, 31, 171–179, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Le Meur et al.(2004)Le Meur, Gagliardini,
Zwinger, and Ruokolainen</label><mixed-citation>
Le Meur, E., Gagliardini, O., Zwinger, T., and Ruokolainen,
J.: Glacier flow modelling: a comparison of the Shallow Ice
Approximation and the full-Stokes solution, C. R. Phys., 5, 709–722, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Leysinger Vieli and
Gudmundsson(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Leysinger Vieli, G. and Gudmundsson, G.: On estimating length
fluctuations of glaciers caused by changes in climatic forcing, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 109, F01007, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JF000027" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003JF000027</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Licciardi et al.(2007)Licciardi, Kurz, and
Curtice</label><mixed-citation>
Licciardi, J. M., Kurz, M. D., and Curtice, J. M.: Glacial
and volcanic history of Icelandic table mountains from cosmogenic
<sup>3</sup>He exposure ages, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 26,
1529–1546, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Liston and Sturm(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Liston, G. E. and Sturm, M.: A snow-transport model for complex terrain,
J. Glaciol., 44, 498–516, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Lorrey et al.(2012)Lorrey, Vandergoes, Almond,
Renwick, Stephens, Bostock, Mackintosh, Newnham,
Williams, Ackerley, Neil, and Fowler</label><mixed-citation>
Lorrey, A. M., Vandergoes, M., Almond, P., Renwick, J.,
Stephens, T., Bostock, H., Mackintosh, A., Newnham, R. M.,
Williams, P. W., Ackerley, D., Neil, H., and Fowler, A. M.:
Palaeocirculation across New Zealand during the last glacial
maximum at 21 ka, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 36, 189–213, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Mackintosh et al.(2002)Mackintosh, Dugmore, and
Hubbard</label><mixed-citation>
Mackintosh, A. N., Dugmore, A. J., and Hubbard, A. L.: Holocene
climatic changes in Iceland: evidence from modelling glacier length
fluctuations at Sólheimajökull, Quatern.
Int., 91, 39–52, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Mathews(1967)</label><mixed-citation>
Mathews, W. H.: A contribution to the geology of the Mount
Tongariro massif, North Island, New Zealand, New
Zeal. J. Geol. Geop., 10, 1027–1038,
1967.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>McArthur and Shepherd(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
McArthur, J. L. and Shepherd, M. J.: Late Quaternary
glaciation of Mt Ruapehu, North Island, New Zealand,
J. Roy. Soc. New Zeal., 20, 287–296,
1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>McCarthy et al.(2008)McCarthy, Mackintosh,
Rieser, and Fink</label><mixed-citation>
McCarthy, A., Mackintosh, A., Rieser, U., and Fink, D.:
Mountain glacier chronology from Boulder Lake, New
Zealand, indicates MIS 4 and MIS 2 ice advances
of similar extent, Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res.,
40, 695–708, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>McClelland and Erwin(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
McClelland, E. and Erwin, P. S.: Was a dacite dome implicated in the 9 500 BP
collapse of Mt Ruapehu? A palaeomagnetic investigation, B. Volcanol., 65, 294–305, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>McGlone and Topping(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
McGlone, M. and Topping, W. .: Aranuian (post-glacial) pollen diagrams from the
Tongariro region, North Island, New Zealand, New Zeal.
J. Bot., 15, 749–760, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>McKinnon et al.(2012)McKinnon, Mackintosh,
Anderson, and Barrell</label><mixed-citation>
McKinnon, K. A., Mackintosh, A. N., Anderson, B. M., and
Barrell, D. J. A.: The influence of sub-glacial bed evolution on ice
extent: A model-based evaluation of the Last Glacial Maximum
Pukaki glacier, New Zealand, Quaternary Sci.
Rev., 57, 46–57, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Mitchell(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Mitchell, W. A.: Significance of snowblow in the generation of Loch
Lomond Stadial (Younger Dryas) glaciers in the western
Pennines, northern England, J. Quaternary Sci., 11,
233–248, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Moebis et al.(2011)Moebis, Cronin, Neall, and Smith</label><mixed-citation>
Moebis, A., Cronin, S. J., Neall, V. E., and Smith, I. E.: Unravelling a
complex volcanic history from fine-grained, intricate Holocene ash sequences
at the Tongariro Volcanic Centre, New Zealand, Quatern.
Int., 246, 352–363, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Monnin et al.(2001)Monnin, Indermühle, Dällenbach,
Flückiger, Stauffer, Stocker, Raynaud, and
Barnola</label><mixed-citation>
Monnin, E., Indermühle, A., Dällenbach, A., Flückiger, J.,
Stauffer, B., Stocker, T. F., Raynaud, D., and Barnola, J. .:
Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations over the last glacial termination,
Science, 291, 112–114, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Newnham et al.(2007)Newnham, Lowe, Giles, and
Alloway</label><mixed-citation>
Newnham, R. M., Lowe, D. J., Giles, T., and Alloway, B. V.:
Vegetation and climate of Auckland, New Zealand, since ca. 32 000 cal. yr ago: Support for an extended LGM,
J. Quaternary Sci., 22, 517–534, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Newnham et al.(2013)Newnham, McGlone, Moar,
Wilmshurst, and Vandergoes</label><mixed-citation>
Newnham, R. M., McGlone, M., Moar, N., Wilmshurst, J., and
Vandergoes, M.: The vegetation cover of New Zealand at the
Last Glacial Maximum, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 74,
202–214, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>NIWA(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
NIWA: CliFlo: NIWA's National Climate
Database on the Web, available at: <a href="http://cliflo.niwa.co.nz/" target="_blank">http://cliflo.niwa.co.nz/</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Norton(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Norton, D. A.: A multivariate technique for estimating New
Zealand temperature normals, Weather and Climate, 5, 64–74,
1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Oerlemans(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Oerlemans, J.: Climate sensitivity of glaciers in southern
Norway: application of an energy-balance model to Nigardsbreen,
Hellstugubreen and Alfotbreen, J. Glaciol., 38,
223–232, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Oerlemans(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Oerlemans, J.: Climate sensitivity of Franz Josef Glacier,
New Zealand, as revealed by numerical modeling, Arctic Alpine Res., 29, 233–239, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Osborn et al.(2012)Osborn, Menounos, Ryane,
Riedel, Clague, Koch, Clark, Scott, and
Davis</label><mixed-citation>
Osborn, G., Menounos, B., Ryane, C., Riedel, J., Clague,
J. J., Koch, J., Clark, D., Scott, K., and Davis, P. T.:
Latest pleistocene and holocene glacier fluctuations on Mount
Baker, Washington, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 49,
33–51, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Östrem(1959)</label><mixed-citation>
Östrem, G.: Ice melting under a thin layer of moraine, and the existence of
ice cores in moraine ridges, Geogr. Ann., 41, 228–230, 1959.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Palmer and Neall(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Palmer, B. and Neall, V.: The Murimotu Formation - 9500
year old deposits of a debris avalanche and associated lahars, Mount
Ruapehu, North Island, New Zealand, New Zeal.
J. Geol. Geop., 32, 477–486, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Paterson(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Paterson, W. S. B.: The Physics of Glaciers, Elsevier, Oxford,
New York, USA and Tokyo, Japan, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Paulin(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Paulin, T.: Glaciers and Climate Change, Mount Ruapehu,
New Zealand, Master's thesis, Victoria University of
Wellington, New Zealand, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Plummer and Phillips(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Plummer, M. A. and Phillips, F. M.: A 2-D numerical model of snow/ice
energy balance and ice flow for paleoclimatic interpretation of glacial
geomorphic features, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 22, 1389–1406, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Porter(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
Porter, S. C.: Equilibrium-line altitudes of late Quaternary
glaciers in the Southern Alps, New Zealand, Quaternary
Res., 5, 27–47, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Price et al.(2012)Price, Gamble, Smith, Maas,
Waight, Stewart, and Woodhead</label><mixed-citation>
Price, R. C., Gamble, J. A., Smith, I. E., Maas, R.,
Waight, T., Stewart, R. B., and Woodhead, J.: The anatomy of
an Andesite volcano: a time–stratigraphic study of andesite petrogenesis
and crustal evolution at Ruapehu Volcano, New Zealand,
J. Petrol., 53, 2139–2189, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Putnam et al.(2013a)Putnam, Schaefer,
Denton, Barrell, Andersen, Koffman, Rowan, Finkel,
Rood, Schwartz, Vandergoes, Plummer, Brocklehurst,
Kelley, and Ladig</label><mixed-citation>
Putnam, A. E., Schaefer, J. M., Denton, G. H., Barrell, D.
J. A., Andersen, B. G., Koffman, T. N. B., Rowan, A. V.,
Finkel, R. C., Rood, D. H., Schwartz, R., Vandergoes, M. J.,
Plummer, M. A., Brocklehurst, S. H., Kelley, S. E., and
Ladig, K. L.: Warming and glacier recession in the Rakaia valley,
Southern Alps of New Zealand, during Heinrich Stadial
1, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 382, 98–110,
2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Putnam et al.(2013b)Putnam, Schaefer,
Denton, Barrell, Birkel, Andersen, Kaplan, Finkel,
Schwartz, and Doughty</label><mixed-citation>
Putnam, A. E., Schaefer, J. M., Denton, G. H., Barrell, D.
J. A., Birkel, S. D., Andersen, B. G., Kaplan, M. R., Finkel,
R. C., Schwartz, R., and Doughty, A. M.: The Last Glacial
Maximum at 44° S documented by a <sup>10</sup>Be moraine
chronology at Lake Ohau, Southern Alps of New
Zealand, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 62, 114–141,
2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Rea et al.(1999)Rea, Whalley, Dixon, and Gordon</label><mixed-citation>
Rea, B. R., Whalley, W. B., Dixon, T. S., and Gordon, J. E.: Plateau icefields
as contributing areas to valley glaciers and the potential impact on
reconstructed ELAs: a case study from the Lyngen Alps, North
Norway, Ann. Glaciol., 28, 97–102, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Richardson and Brook(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, J. M. and Brook, M. S.: Ablation of debris-covered ice: some
effects of the 25 September 2007 Mt Ruapehu eruption, J. Roy. Soc. of New Zeal., 40, 45–55, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Rivera and Bown(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Rivera, A. and Bown, F.: Recent glacier variations on active ice capped
volcanoes in the Southern Volcanic Zone (37–46° S), Chilean Andes, J. S. Am. Earth Sci., 45,
345–356, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Rivera et al.(2012)Rivera, Bown, Carrión, and
Zenteno</label><mixed-citation>
Rivera, A., Bown, F., Carrión, D., and Zenteno, P.: Glacier responses to
recent volcanic activity in Southern Chile, Environ. Res.
Lett., 7, 014036, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014036" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014036</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Rojas et al.(2009)Rojas, Moreno, Kageyama,
Crucifix, Hewitt, Abe Ouchi, Ohgaito, Brady, and
Hope</label><mixed-citation>
Rojas, M., Moreno, P., Kageyama, M., Crucifix, M., Hewitt,
C., Abe Ouchi, A., Ohgaito, R., Brady, E. C., and Hope,
P.: The Southern Westerlies during the last glacial maximum in
PMIP2 simulations, Clim. Dynam., 32, 525–548,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Rowan et al.(2013)Rowan, Plummer, Brocklehurst,
Jones, and Schultz</label><mixed-citation>
Rowan, A. V., Plummer, M. A., Brocklehurst, S. H., Jones,
M. A., and Schultz, D. M.: Drainage capture and discharge variations
driven by glaciation in the Southern Alps, New Zealand,
Geology, 41, 199–202, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Rowan et al.(2014)Rowan, Brocklehurst, Schultz,
Plummer, Anderson, and Glasser</label><mixed-citation>
Rowan, A. V., Brocklehurst, S. H., Schultz, D. M., Plummer,
M. A., Anderson, L. S., and Glasser, N. F.: Late Quaternary
glacier sensitivity to temperature and precipitation distribution in the
Southern Alps of New Zealand, J. Geophys.
Res.-Earth, 24,  1064–1081, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Sandiford et al.(2003)Sandiford, Newnham, Alloway,
and Ogden</label><mixed-citation>
Sandiford, A., Newnham, R. M., Alloway, B. V., and Ogden, J.:
A 28 000–7600 cal yr BP pollen record of vegetation and climate
change from Pukaki Crater, northern New Zealand,
Palaeogeogr. Palaeoecol., 201, 235–247,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Schaefer et al.(2006)Schaefer, Denton, Barrell,
Ivy Ochs, Kubik, Andersen, Phillips, Lowell, and
Schlüchter</label><mixed-citation>
Schaefer, J. M., Denton, G. H., Barrell, D. J. A., Ivy
Ochs, S., Kubik, P. W., Andersen, B. G., Phillips, F. M.,
Lowell, T. V., and Schlüchter, C.: Near-synchronous
interhemispheric termination of the Last Glacial Maximum in
mid-latitudes, Science, 312, 1510–1513, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Schaefer et al.(2015)Schaefer, Putnam, Denton, Kaplan, Birkel,
Doughty, Kelley, Barrell, Finkel, Winckler et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Schaefer, J. M., Putnam, A. E., Denton, G. H., Kaplan, M. R., Birkel, S.,
Doughty, A. M., Kelley, S., Barrell, D. J., Finkel, R. C., Winckler, G.,
et al.: The Southern Glacial Maximum 65 000 years ago and its
unfinished termination, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 114, 52–60, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Schmittner et al.(2011)Schmittner, Urban, Shakun,
Mahowald, Clark, Bartlein, Mix, and Rosell
Melé</label><mixed-citation>
Schmittner, A., Urban, N. M., Shakun, J. D., Mahowald, N. M.,
Clark, P. U., Bartlein, P. J., Mix, A. C., and Rosell
Melé, A.: Climate sensitivity estimated from temperature
reconstructions of the Last Glacial Maximum, Science, 334,
1385–1388, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Seltzer et al.(2015)Seltzer, Stute, Morgernstern, Stewart, and
Schaefer</label><mixed-citation>
Seltzer, A. M., Stute, M., Morgernstern, U., Stewart, M. K., and Schaefer,
J. M.: Mean annual temperature in New Zealand during the last glacial
maximum derived from dissolved noble gases in groundwater, Earth
Planet. Sci. Lett., 431, 206–216, 2015.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Stephens et al.(2012)Stephens, Atkin, Cochran,
Augustinus, Reid, Lorrey, Shane, and Street
Perrott</label><mixed-citation>
Stephens, T., Atkin, D., Cochran, U., Augustinus, P., Reid,
M., Lorrey, A., Shane, P., and Street Perrott, A.: A
diatom-inferred record of reduced effective precipitation during the Last
Glacial Coldest Phase (28.8–18.0 cal kyr BP) and
increasing Holocene seasonality at Lake Pupuke, Auckland,
New Zealand, J. Paleolimnol., 48, 801–817, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Stipp(1968)</label><mixed-citation>
Stipp, J. J.: The geochronology and petrogenesis of the Cenovoic
volcanics of the North Island, New Zealand, PhD
Thesis, The Australian National University,
Canberra, Australia, 1968.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Tait and Macara(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Tait, A. and Macara, G.: Evaluation of interpolated daily temperature data for
high elevation areas in New Zealand, Weather and Climate, 34, 36–49,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Tait et al.(2006)Tait, Henderson, Turner, and
Zheng</label><mixed-citation>
Tait, A., Henderson, R., Turner, R., and Zheng, X.: Thin
plate smoothing spline interpolation of daily rainfall for New
Zealand using a climatological rainfall surface, International
J. Climatol., 26, 2097–2115, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Taylor(1926)</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, G.: Notes on the glaciation of Ruapehu, Transactions of the
N.Z. Institute, 57, 235–236, 1926.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>Topping(1973)</label><mixed-citation>
Topping, W.: Tephrostratigraphy and chronology of late Quaternary eruptives
from the Tongariro Volcanic Centre, New Zealand, New
Zeal. J. Geol. Geop., 16, 397–423, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Topping(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
Topping, W. W.: Some aspects of Quaternary history of Tongariro
Volcanic Centre, PhD Thesis, Victoria
University of Wellington, Wellingtion, New Zealand, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Topping and Kohn(1973)</label><mixed-citation>
Topping, W. W. and Kohn, B. P.: Rhyolitic tephra marker beds in the
Tongariro area, North Island, New Zealand, New
Zeal. J. Geol. Geop., 16, 375–395,
1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>Townsend et al.(2008)Townsend, Vonk, and
Kamp</label><mixed-citation>
Townsend, D., Vonk, A., and Kamp, P.: Geology map of the
Taranaki area: scale 1 : 250 000. Three maps and notes,
Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences 1 : 250 000
geological map 7. p. 77, + 1 folded map, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>Townsend et al.(2016)Townsend, Leonard
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Townsend, D. B., Leonard, G. S., Conway, C. E., Eaves, S. R., and Wilson, C. J. N.: Geology of the Tongariro National Park
area 1 : 60 000. GNS Science Geological Map 4. 1 Sheet + monograph. Lower Hutt,
New Zealand. GNS Science., in preparation, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>Vandergoes et al.(2005)Vandergoes, Newnham, Preusser,
Hendy, Lowell, Fitzsimons, Hogg, Kasper, and
Schlüchter</label><mixed-citation>
Vandergoes, M. J., Newnham, R. M., Preusser, F., Hendy, C. H.,
Lowell, T. V., Fitzsimons, S. J., Hogg, A. G., Kasper, H. U.,
and Schlüchter, C.: Regional insolation forcing of Late
Quaternary climate change in the Southern Hemisphere, Nature,
436, 242–245, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>Whittaker et al.(2011)Whittaker, Hendy, and
Hellstrom</label><mixed-citation>
Whittaker, T. E., Hendy, C. H., and Hellstrom, J. C.: Abrupt
millennial-scale changes in intensity of Southern Hemisphere westerly
winds during marine isotope stages 2-4, Geology, 39, 455–458, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>Wilmshurst et al.(2007)Wilmshurst, McGlone, Leathwick, and
Newnham</label><mixed-citation>
Wilmshurst, J. M., McGlone, M. S., Leathwick, J. R., and Newnham, R. M.: A
pre-deforestation pollen-climate calibration model for New Zealand
and quantitative temperature reconstructions for the past 18 000 years BP,
J. Quaternary Sci., 22, 535–547, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
