<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">CP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Climate of the Past</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">CP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Clim. Past</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1814-9332</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/cp-10-2081-2014</article-id><title-group><article-title>CREST (Climate REconstruction SofTware): a probability density function (PDF)-based quantitative climate reconstruction method</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{CREST}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M.~Chevalier et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chevalier</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          <email>manuel.chevalier@univ-montp2.fr</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cheddadi</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Chase</surname><given-names>B. M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6987-1291</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institut des Sciences de l'Évolution de Montpellier, UMR 5554, Centre National de Recherche Scientifique/Université Montpellier 2, Bat. 22, CC061, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, CEDEX 5, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Archaeology, History, Culture and Religion, University of Bergen,  P.O. Box 7805, 5020 Bergen, Norway</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">M. Chevalier (manuel.chevalier@univ-montp2.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>28</day><month>November</month><year>2014</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>10</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>2081</fpage><lpage>2098</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>28</day><month>January</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>February</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>

      <self-uri xlink:href="https://www.clim-past.net/10/2081/2014/cp-10-2081-2014.html">This article is available from https://www.clim-past.net/10/2081/2014/cp-10-2081-2014.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://www.clim-past.net/10/2081/2014/cp-10-2081-2014.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://www.clim-past.net/10/2081/2014/cp-10-2081-2014.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
    <p>Several methods currently exist to quantitatively reconstruct
palaeoclimatic variables from fossil botanical data. Of these, probability
density function (PDF)-based methods have proven
valuable as they can be applied to a wide range of plant
assemblages. Most commonly applied to fossil pollen data, their
performance, however, can be limited by the taxonomic resolution of
the pollen data, as many species may belong to a given
pollen type. Consequently, the climate information associated with
different species cannot always be precisely identified,
resulting in less-accurate reconstructions. This can become
particularly problematic in regions of high biodiversity. In this
paper, we propose a novel PDF-based method that takes into account
the different climatic requirements of each species constituting the
broader pollen type. PDFs are fitted in two successive steps, with
parametric PDFs fitted first for each species and then
a combination of those individual species PDFs into a broader
single PDF to represent the pollen type as a unit. A climate value
for the pollen assemblage is estimated from the likelihood function
obtained after the multiplication of the pollen-type PDFs, with
each being weighted according to its pollen percentage.</p>
    <p>To test its performance, we have applied the method to southern Africa as a
regional case study and reconstructed a suite of climatic variables (e.g.
winter and summer temperature and precipitation, mean annual aridity,
rainfall seasonality). The reconstructions are shown to be accurate for
both temperature and precipitation. Predictable exceptions were areas that
experience conditions at the extremes of the regional climatic spectra.
Importantly, the accuracy of the reconstructed values is independent of the
vegetation type where the method is applied or the number of species used.</p>
    <p>The method used in this study is publicly available in a software package
entitled CREST (Climate REconstruction SofTware) and will provide the opportunity to reconstruct quantitative
estimates of climatic variables even in areas with high geographical and
botanical diversity.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Reconstructing past climates, while being an important element in the global
effort to understand climate system dynamics and their potential future
structure and characteristics, is often limited to qualitative assessments of
past conditions. This limits the potential for comparisons with the general
circulation model (GCM) simulations, and the integration of
palaeoenvironmental information in modelling initiatives
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.1"/>. As a result, while inconsistencies exist both
between GCM simulations and between GCM simulations and fossil records, it is
difficult to use the bulk of the palaeodata available to evaluate GCM
simulations in an efficient and effective way.</p>
      <p>Many techniques have been developed to quantitatively reconstruct past
climates from palaeobotanical data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.2"/>. They rely on the fundamental hypothesis that
a causal relationship exists between the modern distributions of plants and
the associated climates (Jackson and Williams, 2004, and references therein).
These techniques can be divided into two types: (1) those based on plant
assemblages – modern analogue technique (MAT)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.3"/>, weighted averaging (WA)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.4"/>,
weighted averaging–partial least-squares regressions (WA-PLS)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.5"/>, artificial neural networks (ANNs)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.6"/> or regression trees <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.7"/> –
and (2) those based on plant distributions – mutual climatic range (MCR)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.8"/>, the coexistence
approach (CA) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.9"/> or
probability density functions (PDFs) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.10"/>.
These methods are fully detailed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.11"/>. Amongst these
methods, MAT, WA and WA-PLS are the most commonly used. To date, no consensus
has been reached as to which performs the best, and since the paper of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.12"/> the debate has been focussed on the sensitivity of
different methods to spatial autocorrelation in the training data set, which
can cause an overestimation of the performance of a method
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.13"/>.</p>
      <p>Beyond these conceptual issues, the calibration data set is another key
concern. Methods based on plant assemblages need to be calibrated on robust
modern data sets covering various environmental and biotic conditions, data
sets that are not available from many parts of the world (e.g. drylands
where pollen is often poorly preserved in surface samples). In such
situations, the flexibility of methods based on plant distributions (MCR, CA,
PDFs) becomes more evident, expanding the range and scope of
“reconstructible” environments. They also offer the possibility to
reconstruct climate from non-analogue assemblages, provided that most species
from that palaeoassemblage still exist. Conceptually, PDF-based methods
evolved from MCR techniques as a way to model the strength of the
relationship between plants and climate. Indeed, MCR (which considers a
rectangular envelope defined by minimum and maximum values for a given
climate variable) can be seen as the simplest PDF-based method. These
methods are based on the correlation between plants' modern geographical
distribution and climate gradients, with the climate value that is the most
common in the plant distribution being its “optimum”. Among the approaches
that have already been proposed within the last decade
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.14"/>, a recurrent issue
concerns the assumptions made about the morphological characteristics of the
envelope (width, skewness, central tendencies). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.15"/> fitted
a multidimensional Gaussian surface that excluded both multimodality and
asymmetry, which are however common features when dealing with botanical
assemblages. Later, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.16"/> proposed to fit mixture models
(combination of several Gaussian surfaces) to relax the constraints of a
unimodal Gaussian shape, and more recently <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.17"/> proposed
the application of non-parametric PDFs to improve the fit between PDF and
data.</p>
      <p>In addition to the issue of the shape, the accuracy of such models is also a
function of the taxonomic resolution at which pollen can be identified
(usually family to generic level) and the number of species making up a given
pollen type. Pollen types often become climatically non-informative due to a
saturation effect wherein too many species result in the climatic information
conveyed by each species being averaged and lost. Contrary to the problem of
the shape of the climate envelope, the problem of low taxonomic resolution
has rarely been discussed as its effects are usually not significant when
plant diversity is relatively low. However, in areas where pollen types can
comprise a high number of plant species (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), it becomes increasingly
significant and can result in saturated PDFs. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.18"/>
proposed a species selection method (SSM) that recursively alters the
taxonomic composition of a pollen type by taking into account the
coexistence with other pollen types. In order to minimize PDF saturation,
the SSM removes species that have climate requirements that are different
from that of the assemblage.</p>
      <p>However, the SSM only removes species with optima at the extremes of climatic
gradients, leaving a certain number of climatically undifferentiated species
around the median climate. We believe that the problems of PDF shape and
plant diversity are in fact intimately related to the strategy used for
fitting PDFs. A pollen type is not a homogeneous ecological unit in the
sense that many species with different climate requirements can be classified
in the same pollen type. From this point of view, fitting a density function
directly to a pollen type is questionable. On the basis that species are the
ecological units that respond to climate gradients, we propose a two-step
procedure to define the PDF of the pollen types: (1) univariate and
unimodal parametric PDFs are fitted for the species
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s), and (2) those parametric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are combined to produce the PDF of the pollen-type
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reflects the
diversity that exists among its species by considering independently each
species. To reconstruct a climate value, we propose to combine the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a weighted geometric mean. The multiplication
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ensures the conservation of the mutual climatic
range.</p>
      <p>To quantify the method's capability to reconstruct different variables in
different environments, we have reconstructed a set of modern climatic
conditions (20 variables) over a large area (3389 quarter-degree grid cells
representing southern Africa). Southern Africa – composed of South Africa,
Botswana, Lesotho, Swaziland and Namibia – is well suited for such a test as
it is characterized by a strong topographic, geological and climatic
heterogeneity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.19"/>,
leading ultimately to a great diversity of plant species
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.20"/>. Statistical tests were performed on climate
anomalies (1) to analyse where and why the model was reliable, and (2) to
measure the effects of parameters, such as the type of variable, the number of
taxa used and/or the vegetation type.</p>
      <p>The method presented here has been implemented in a software package entitled
CREST (Climate REconstruction SofTware). CREST – presented in
Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/> – is intended to make quantitative climate
reconstructions more accessible to the wider community. Our hope is that a
proliferation of quantitative reconstructions of past climate conditions will
facilitate the consideration of palaeoenvironmental data in the assessment of
GCM performance and ultimately allow for an improved understanding of both
past and potential future climate change.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methodology</title>
      <p>The climate reconstruction method we propose is based on univariate PDFs.
Here, a PDF represents the probability of a species existing along a
climate gradient and is a surrogate for the species' realized niche <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.21"><named-content content-type="pre">see
for example</named-content></xref>. The process follows three general steps: (1)
the plant–climate relationship is quantified (i.e. PDFs are fitted), (2)
information conveyed by each taxon is combined and finally (3) a climate
value from the resulting climate likelihood function is extracted. This
method relies on the assumption that the plant–climate relationship has
remained relatively constant since the deposition of the fossil assemblage.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>An example of PDF fitting for two variables (Prec dry Q and Tmean
ann) for the pollen type <italic>Tribulus</italic>, which is composed of four species
in our database. Four <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s are then fitted for each
variable (<bold>a</bold> and <bold>b</bold>) and combined to create the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<bold>c</bold> and <bold>d</bold>). The dashed lines on
<bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> are the PDFs obtained by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.22"/>. The difference between the two methods is more marked
for prec dry Q, where (i) the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is null for
negative precipitation values (more realistic) and (ii) the optimum is more
marked and reflects the optima of the different species.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.clim-past.net/10/2081/2014/cp-10-2081-2014-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Fitting of the PDFs</title>
      <p>This step is critical for all PDF-based methods. Many different strategies
have been proposed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.23"/>, all of them fitting a PDF to the pollen types identified
in the fossil record. This strategy leads to a loss of certain information
because (1) individual signals are mixed and (2) rare species are masked by
the most extended ones.</p>
      <p>Here we propose a two-step procedure to fit PDFs that better integrates the
diversity that can exist within some pollen types. First, we fit a PDF to
each species (noted <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and secondly we combine the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The latter considers
more clearly the pollen type's diversity.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Creating $\text{PDF}_{{\text{sp}}}$}?><title>Creating <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>Based on observations, we propose that distributions of climatic values where
a species is found – its niche – can be classified into two shapes: a
log-normal shape (Fig. 1a) or a normal shape (Fig. 1b) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.24"/>. The normal shape is symmetric, while
the log-normal shape is markedly right-skewed (left-skewed distributions have
been observed but are uncommon). In addition, the log-normal function is null
for negative values, which is of interest when modelling variables such as
rainfall amounts. Both curves are defined by two parameters: the mean
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) and the variance <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) of the species niche, with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being
the studied climatic gradient.</p>
      <p>The estimation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be biased if the
abundance of each climate value is not considered
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.25"/>. Following the model of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.26"/> on
that particular point, we propose dividing the climatic space into bins of
equal width. All the climate values (a total of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) are sorted into <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
bins. The number and/or length of the bins is variable and depends on the
dispersion of the climate values. A weight <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined for each bin as
the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with the number of pixels <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the bin <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>). Each climate value from bin <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> will have the same weight
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.

                  <disp-formula content-type="numbered" specific-use="align"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              The shape and the position of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along a gradient
can be calculated with Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>)
representing the normal law and the log-normal law
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b and a), respectively.

                  <disp-formula content-type="numbered" specific-use="align"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ln</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>with</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable class="cases" rowspacing="0.2ex" columnspacing="1em" columnalign="left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ln</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>ln</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ln</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Creating $\text{PDF}_{{\text{pol}}}$}?><title>Creating <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>To create the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, all the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s are
added with a weight determined by their geographical extent (represented by
the number of grid cells occupied <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>). Due to the absence
of detailed, functional information regarding the pollen production of the
different plant species, we are forced to consider that it is a constant
among all the species of a pollen type and thus that each species is likely
to have equally contributed to the observed pollen biomass. While
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s have an imposed shape, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s are
not constrained since no assumptions are being made. A
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can thus be multimodal when the diversity within
the pollen type results in two or more climatically separated groups of
species. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c and d highlight the
advantage of that method: for instance, the climatic signals conveyed by the
three species <italic>Tribulus cristatus</italic>, <italic>T. pterophorus</italic> and
<italic>T. zeyheri</italic> are not masked by the signals of the most extended one,
<italic>T. terrestris</italic>.

                  <disp-formula content-type="numbered" id="Ch1.E6"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Combination of the $\text{PDF}_{{\text{pol}}}$ to create the $\text{PDF}_{{\text{var}}}$}?><title>Combination of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to create the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>var</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>We propose the combination of different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s with a
weighted geometrical mean (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>). The multiplication of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s ensures that the reconstructed climate value will
be in the mutual climate range of the taxa considered. In addition, since
plants may pollinate more when they live close to their climate optimum
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.27"/>, the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s are weighted according to a monotonically
increasing function of their pollen percentage <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> representing a sample (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>).<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>

                <disp-formula content-type="numbered" id="Ch1.E7"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>var</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∏</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Using pollen percentages <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to weight taxa is problematic,
as it is with traditional interpretive techniques, because pollen production
can vary substantially from one plant to another
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.28"/>. The pollen production is unknown for the vast
majority of plant species, and one cannot effectively employ this information
to fit the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s. To address this issue, we follow the
method developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.29"/>, wherein percentages were
<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>rescaled<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?><?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>between<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> 0 and 1, with 1 corresponding to the highest
percentage observed for the pollen type. This normalization is, however, very
sensitive to outliers. In CREST, percentages are rescaled by the mean
percentage of the pollen type when it is present in a sample. In other words,
to calculate the mean, only strictly positive values are considered
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>). For a given pollen type, our weights have a
correlation of 1 with those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.30"/>; the difference lies in
the relative weights between taxa.

                <disp-formula content-type="numbered" id="Ch1.E8"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∀</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Climate reconstruction</title>
      <p>The reconstructed climate corresponds to the abscissa <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
of the optimum of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>var</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>). <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>var</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> describes the likelihood
of any climatic value to be the target value when considering the
presence of many pollen types.

                <disp-formula content-type="numbered" id="Ch1.E9"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mtext>argmax</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>var</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Calculation of a CI exemplified with a right-skewed
PDF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>var</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. More values are rejected on the right-hand side of the
climate gradient. The grey areas cover an area representing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>%.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.clim-past.net/10/2081/2014/cp-10-2081-2014-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Distribution of the southern African biomes and ecoregions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.31"/>: (1) <italic>deserts and xeric shrublands</italic> – (1a)
Kaokoveld Desert, (1b) Namib Desert, (1c) Namibian savanna woodlands, (1d)
Succulent Karoo, (1e) Nama Karoo, (1f) Kalahari xeric savanna; (2)
<italic>montane grasslands and shrublands</italic> – (2a) Drakensberg altimontane
grasslands and woodlands, (2b) Highveld grasslands, (2c) Drakensberg montane
grasslands, woodlands and forests, (2d) Maputaland–Pondoland bushland and
thickets; (3) <italic>Mediterranean forests, woodlands and scrub</italic> – (3a)
Albany thickets, (3b) montane fynbos and renosterveld, (3c) lowland fynbos
and renosterveld; (4) <italic>flooded grasslands and savannas</italic> – (4a)
Zambezian halophytics, (4b) Zambezian flooded grasslands, (4c) Etosha Pan
halophytics; (5) <italic>tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas and shrublands</italic> – (5a) southern Africa bushveld, (5b) Kalahari Acacia-Baikiaea
woodlands, (5c) Zambezian and Mopane woodlands, (5d) Angolan Mopane
woodlands, (5e) Zambezian Baikiaea woodlands; (6) <italic>tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests</italic> – (6a) Maputaland coastal forest mosaic,
(6b) KwaZulu–Cape coastal forest mosaic, (6c) Knysna–Amatole montane forests;
(7) <italic>mangroves</italic>. The dashed white lines delineate the different
rainfall zones as defined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.32"/>: the winter rainfall
zone (WRZ; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % winter rain), the summer rainfall zone (SRZ;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of winter rain) and the year-round rainfall zone (YRZ) in
between.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.clim-past.net/10/2081/2014/cp-10-2081-2014-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Error estimations</title>
      <p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>var</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s provide access to the complete distribution of
errors. They can be estimated at different thresholds (noted <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>% confidence interval (CI) is more appropriate than a standard
deviation because <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>var</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s are rarely symmetrical
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Validation</title>
      <p>As a case study, we have used a modern botanical database to reconstruct a
set of contemporary climate values to highlight and explore the strengths and
weaknesses of the approach, and to quantify its accuracy and robustness.
Using southern Africa as a study area, we consider five countries: South
Africa, Namibia, Lesotho, Swaziland and Botswana (from 17 to 34.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S
and from 12 to 32.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). This area is composed
of 3913 quarter-degree grid cells. The region provides an excellent case
study as it is characterized by strong topographic, geologic and climatic
heterogeneity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.33"/>,
which has resulted in the existence of many vegetation types, which often
change rapidly over <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>short distances<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Climate system</title>
      <p>Most of southern Africa is dominated by summer rainfall related to the
seasonal dynamics of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) and the
advection of moist tropical air masses off the Indian Ocean. Annual rainfall
is highest along the eastern escarpment (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>1200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx28" id="altparen.34"/><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>) and decreases westward. Conversely, in the Cape
region (southern tip of Africa), most of the rain falls during the winter
months as a result of frontal systems embedded in the southern westerlies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.35"/> and can reach annual totals of more than
900 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A complex mosaic of rainfall regimes are found at the
boundary between those two systems: from year-round rainfall along the south
coast of South Africa (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>900</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> distributed in more than 100
rain events per year) to the super-arid Namib Desert (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
rain events). The orographic effects of the Drakensberg escarpment and the
Cape Fold Belt are very marked, creating a strong rain shadow effect in their
lee.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Distribution of the number of species (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) per grid
cell. The greener the grid cell is, the more species are available to
reconstruct climate. No botanical information is available in the black grid
cells. Species records are most abundant in South Africa, Swaziland and
Lesotho.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.clim-past.net/10/2081/2014/cp-10-2081-2014-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The west coast is cooled by upwelling associated with the northward-flowing
Benguela Current, whereas the south and east coasts are warmed by the
southward-flowing Agulhas and Mozambique currents, respectively. At a given
latitude, the difference in temperature between the two coasts can exceed
6<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C. The greatest diurnal temperature ranges are found in the
interior, especially in the Kalahari and the Karoo region, where the altitude
is greater than 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in many areas
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.36"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>List of the 20 climate variables reconstructed for southern Africa (name, description and original reference).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Variable's name</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Description</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tmean ann</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean annual temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.37"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean diurnal range</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean of monthly (max temp–min temp)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.38"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Temp seasonality</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Standard deviation of the annual temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.39"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Temp ann range</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Annual range of temperature (max–min)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.40"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tmean wet Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean temperature of the wettest quarter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.41"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tmean dry Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean temperature of the driest quarter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.42"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tmean warm Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean temperature of the warmest quarter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.43"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tmean cold Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean temperatures of the coldest quarter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.44"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Frost days</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Number of frost days per year</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.45"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Moisture</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prec ann</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Annual precipitation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.46"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prec seasonality</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coefficient of variation of annual precipitation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.47"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prec wet Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Precipitation of the wettest quarter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.48"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prec dry Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Precipitation of the driest quarter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.49"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prec warm Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Precipitation of the warmest quarter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.50"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prec cold Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Precipitation of the coldest quarter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.51"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SWC winter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Soil water content during winter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.52"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SWC summer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Soil water content during summer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.53"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aridity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean annual aridity index (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 000)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.54"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WRP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Percentage of winter rainfall</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Derived from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.55"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wet days</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Number of rain days per year</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.56"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The study region currently supports four primary biomes: deserts and
xeric shrublands (54.7 %); montane grasslands and shrublands
(16.8 %); tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas and
shrublands (25.3 %); and Mediterranean forests, woodlands and scrub
(3.2 %) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.57"/>. The latter is better known as the
Cape Floristic Region, which is dominated by the Fynbos Biome. Each
biome is divided into ecoregions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>), which will be used to describe the model's
properties.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Data</title>
      <p>We have extracted botanical data for all grid cells where at least one plant
with more than 25 pixels in its distribution had been recorded, leading to a
total of 3389 “samples” (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). We have then selected 20
climatic variables of interest: 9 temperature-like and 11 moisture-like
variables (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). A total of 4969 species
distributions have been used.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Botanical data</title>
      <p>Botanical data were extracted from a series of databases held by the South
African National Biodiversity Institute
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.58"/>. The data from
these sources, which are derived mainly from herbarium collections and
documented observations, are most commonly available as “presence” within a
particular <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid square. We have used
this resolution for our analyses, upscaling more precisely located data to
this common resolution. Data were obtained from field surveys performed
during the late twentieth century, between 1970 and 2000 with a peak in the
1980s.</p>
      <p>In this study, we only consider species with at least 25 occurrences,
resulting in a number of species (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) available per pixel
between 1 and 1371 (median <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This strong heterogeneity is mainly due
to both the range of environments found in our study area
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>) and the strong difference that exists between the
different countries (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>), with South Africa providing by far the
most extensive data set.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Climatic data</title>
      <p>To define PDFs, the species distributions have to be associated with
climate data. For this study we have reconstructed 20 climate variables from
our data set. While some of those variables represent climatic features
playing a strong role in a plant life cycle (e.g. number of frost
days or different precipitation variables), the impact of some others is much
more indirect (e.g. <italic>mean diurnal range</italic> or <italic>temp ann range</italic>). The purpose of this strategy is to assess the extent to which
different climate variables can be reliably reconstructed with CREST.</p>
      <p>Climate variables for this study were obtained from WORLDCLIM1.4
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.59"/>, which, along with monthly precipitation and
temperature data, provides a data set of 19 bioclimatic variables that are
<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>considered<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?><?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>important<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> elements in studying the eco-physiological
tolerance of plants species. These data were then upscaled to match the
resolution of the botanical data (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Additional variables of interest have also been derived from WORLDCLIM's
data, including the soil water content (SWC; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="altparen.60"/>)
for both summer and winter, the mean annual aridity
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.61"/> and winter rainfall percentage (WRP). We have
also used two variables from the CRU 2.10 (Climate Research Unit) data
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.62"/>: the number of frost and wet days during the
year. Those data (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cells) were downscaled
to meet our resolution. All the climatic values used in this study are
representative of the period 1960–1990; the period is extended to 1950–2000
in some situations.</p>
      <p>The description of all variables as well as their original reference
is summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Accuracy of the model</title>
      <p>We have measured the climate anomalies <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
each variable <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between the reconstructed climate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Recon</mml:mtext><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
the instrumental value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Instru</mml:mtext><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> according to
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>). A positive/negative anomaly is equivalent to an
under/overestimation of the targeted climate.

                <disp-formula content-type="numbered" id="Ch1.E10"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Instru</mml:mtext><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Recon</mml:mtext><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The dispersion of the anomalies for each variable was calculated with the R
software (as all the statistics presented here; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="altparen.63"/>) and has been
compiled in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. The distributions of anomalies are all
centred around 0. Even if all the median values are statistically different
from 0 (sign test, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the relatively low value of these medians
indicates that the model is not subject to undue bias. A major dichotomy can
be observed between the two types of variables (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> test with
Yates' continuity correction, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>): for the temperature-like
variables, the median is positive for eight out of nine variables (general
under-estimation), while for moisture-like variables the opposite is observed,
with negative medians for 10 out of 11 variables (general
overestimation, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). The different percentiles we
have calculated provide insight regarding the dispersion of the reconstructed
values, as do the histograms in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>. The skewness is most
often negative (for 14 variables), meaning that when errors are negative
(overestimation) their absolute value is higher than when they are positive
(75 and 95 % percentiles respectively higher than the 25 and 5 %).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Summary of the dispersion of the anomalies <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (5, 25, 50,
75 and 95 % quantiles), skewness, RMSD and NRMSD of each variable. The
medians are statistically different from 0.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.96}[.96]?><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">50 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">75 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">95 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Skewness</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">RMSD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">NRMSD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tmean ann</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.111</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean diurnal range</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.568</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Temp seasonality</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1324.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>294.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">77.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">345.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">765.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.206</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">662.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.68</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Temp ann range</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.72</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tmean wet Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.455</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tmean dry Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.552</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.55</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tmean warm Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.576</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.65</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tmean cold Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.392</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.55</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Frost days</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.157</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.52</oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[8.535827pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Moisture</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prec ann</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>243.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>96.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>39.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">81.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.711</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">125.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prec seasonality</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">36.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">17.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prec wet Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>102.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>41.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">59.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.505</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">56.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prec dry Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.046</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">14.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.57</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prec warm Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>143.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>54.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">41.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">68.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.63</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prec cold Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.954</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">19.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.48</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SWC winter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>53.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.975</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">26.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.63</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SWC summer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>49.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">17.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">25.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.51</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aridity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1718.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>740.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>354.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>62.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">687.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.592</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">929.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.53</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WRP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.055</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wet days</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.883</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The root mean square deviation (RMSD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/>) is an index
that reflects the mean error of a model, but it is sensitive to outliers. It
does, however, allow for a good evaluation of the performance of the model.
All the values are compiled in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.

                <disp-formula content-type="numbered" id="Ch1.E11"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RMSD</mml:mtext><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The amplitude of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RMSD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are functions of the variable
range. Direct comparisons between variables cannot be performed – except for
those with a similar range of <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>variation<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>, such as Tmean ann, Tmean
cold Q and Tmean warm Q. To remove this discrepancy, we have normalized
our RMSDs by the observed standard deviation of the instrumental values
(NRMSD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E12"/>). NRMSDs are lower for moisture-like
variables, whilst they exhibit the highest anomalies (in units of NRMSD;
Figs. 6 and 7). Four variables present a high NRMSD: mean diurnal range
(0.75), temp ann range (0.72), prec seasonality (0.70) or temp
seasonality (0.68). The climatic signal of these four variables does not
seem to be well captured by the botanical data, and plant distribution is
apparently not directly driven by those variables. They represent annual
climatic variability, and a range of climatic scenarios could result in the
same values. For example, the variable prec seasonality takes identical
values for seasonal rainfalls whether they occur mainly in winter or summer.
This major difference is incorporated into WRP, which has been
reconstructed with a much better accuracy (NRMSD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).

                <disp-formula content-type="numbered" id="Ch1.E12"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NRMSD</mml:mtext><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RMSD</mml:mtext><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Instru</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Percentages of variance (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) explained for the three different
hypotheses we tested in this study to describe the distribution of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, namely the impact of (1) the number of species
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>*<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Alt</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), (2) the type of
vegetation (biomes and ecoregions) and (3) the expected climatic value (clim
and poly(clim, 3)).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>*<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Alt</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Biomes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Ecoregions</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Clim</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Poly(clim,3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tmean ann</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">48.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">49.85</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean diurnal range</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">41.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">60.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">63.96</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Temp seasonality</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">42.78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">51.36</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Temp ann range</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">45.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">43.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">53.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tmean wet Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">28.90</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tmean dry Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">29.42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tmean warm Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">33.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">50.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">50.90</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tmean cold Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">44.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">46.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Frost days</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">37.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">38.95</oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[8.535827pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Prec ann</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10.21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Prec seasonality</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">45.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">59.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">63.43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Prec wet Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13.74</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Prec dry Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">49.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">53.42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Prec warm Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.22</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Prec cold Q</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">28.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">38.39</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SWC winter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">23.82</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SWC summer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">18.50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aridity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">28.85</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WRP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wet days</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">24.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">28.39</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.77</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Geographical analysis of the errors</title>
      <p>Generally, southern African climates are accurately reconstructed with CREST.
The anomalies that do exist are not randomly dispersed throughout the study
area. On the contrary, regions of enhanced or diminished error are observed
for each variable (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> and
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). On these figures, anomalies have been normalized
by the RMSD (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E13"/>) to make all the maps comparable.

                <disp-formula content-type="numbered" id="Ch1.E13"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RMSD</mml:mtext><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          This observation is validated with the measure of the spatial autocorrelation
of the anomalies with Moran’s I <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.64"/> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E14"/> and
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). This index measures the (dis)similarity of nearby
locations in space. To compute this index, a neighbourhood matrix of weights
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined. We have measured the spatial autocorrelation at different
distances: from a local perspective, where only adjacent grid cells are
neighbours, to the continental scale, where all the grid cells are considered
neighbours. Under the null hypothesis (no spatial autocorrelation), Moran's I
is normally distributed. However, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not, and mean and standard
deviations were estimated empirically with 999 permutations for this vector.
We ran 50 tests for each variables (one for each distance) and applied a
Bonferroni correction <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Most of the tests were highly
significant (blue and red dots in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>).

                <disp-formula content-type="numbered" id="Ch1.E14"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The main feature is that the anomalies are highly correlated at local scales
and that correlation decreases with distance. No large-scale structure is
observed in the data (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>,
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). These results show that anomalies
are spatially clustered: in some areas the model performed very well, while it
was less reliable in others. Temperature anomalies are clustered more on
the local scale than precipitation anomalies (higher values at distances lower
than seven–eight grid cells), but the correlation decreases faster with distance (no
distinction beyond 15 grid cells). Seasonality of temperature and
precipitation have a distinct pattern, being correlated at longer distances,
highlighting – in association with high NRMSDs (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>)
– that their errors are not limited to distinct regions.</p>
      <p>Four areas present a group of outliers for several variables: (1) the
Namibian coast (for temperature and precipitation), (2) the high mountains of
Lesotho (for temperature and humidity variables), (3) the eastern part of the
Great Escarpment (precipitation) and (4) the southern coast of South Africa
(precipitation) (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> and
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Geographical distributions of the normalized anomalies of the
reconstructions of temperature-like variables (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E13"/>). The
scale is identical for all the maps, in units of RMSD. No vegetation
information was available from the black pixels.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.clim-past.net/10/2081/2014/cp-10-2081-2014-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Geographical distributions of the normalized anomalies of the
reconstructions of moisture-like variables (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E13"/>). The scale
is identical for all the maps, in units of RMSD. No vegetation information
was available from the black pixels.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.clim-past.net/10/2081/2014/cp-10-2081-2014-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Factors impacting the reconstructions</title>
      <p>As the errors are spatially clustered, we have looked for factors that could
explain this distribution. There is no clear linear relation between the
anomalies absolute values and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The slopes of the linear
models we fitted were statistically significant at the 5 % threshold but
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were always low (3.3 % of variance explained on average,
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). The models can, however, be biased by the uneven
distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; half of the grid cells were reconstructed
with 47 or fewer species, while some others were reconstructed with more than
1000 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). Some of our clusters of errors are found in
mountainous regions, and we have hypothesized that the errors may arise from
a mix of low- and high-altitude plants, with the anomalies observed being
proportional to the degree of mixing. Thus, we have calculated the
intra-pixel variation of altitude (the standard deviation of all the 30
arc-second altitude values in each quarter-degree grid cell, later called
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Alt</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We fitted linear models to explain the anomalies as a
function of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Alt</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the gain of
explained variance was relatively small (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.9 % on average). These
results indicate that the anomalies are not a result of the number of species
used for the reconstruction.</p>
      <p>We also considered the impact of vegetation type on the anomalies. We used
the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.65"/> classification to assign a biome and an ecoregion to
each grid cell (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). We used an ordination technique called
between-groups principal component analyses (PCAs) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.66"/>, available in the R package ade-4
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.67"/>, to reveal the differences that may exist between
vegetation types. With all the variables considered in the same analysis, we
measured whether the type of vegetation impacted the reconstructions. At the biome
level (seven levels; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>), the between-groups variance
only explained 9 % of the total variance, meaning that more than 90 %
of the variance was not explained by the differences between the biomes. The
length of the boxes in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> highlights that there is
more variance within each group than between them.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Moran's I autocorrelogram. The spatial autocorrelation is plotted
for each variable against different distances (measured in grid cells). Each
grid cell is about 28km large/high. Grey symbols represent non-significant
values; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the Bonferroni correction. Only 17 out of 1000
tests are non-significant.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.clim-past.net/10/2081/2014/cp-10-2081-2014-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Box plots representing the dispersion of the normalized anomalies
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E13"/>) for each biome. There is more dispersion within each
biome (length of the boxes) than between, confirming the results of the
between-groups PCA (90 % of variance not explained by the groups).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.clim-past.net/10/2081/2014/cp-10-2081-2014-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Box plots representing the dispersion of the normalized anomalies
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E13"/>) for each ecoregion. There is globally more dispersion
within each ecoregion (length of the boxes) than between, confirming the
results of the between-groups PCA (75 % of variance not explained by the
groups). <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> means the ecoregion is composed of fewer than 50 grid cells;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> means fewer than 25. The numbers match those of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.clim-past.net/10/2081/2014/cp-10-2081-2014-f09.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The between-groups PCA run on ecoregions explains 25 % of the
total variance, but this is low relative to the number of groups
(25). Again, more variance remained within the groups than between
them. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> summarizes the mean dispersion of
errors within each ecoregion. Some ecoregions appear to concentrate
outliers, but these are always composed of 25 or fewer samples (low
geographical extension and/or low amount of botanical data). Thus,
despite the high botanical diversity that exists in southern Africa, we were not
able to demonstrate the type of vegetation (forests, grasslands,
savannas, etc.) having any effect on the quality of the
reconstructions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Anomalies plotted against their expected values. The density of
points is heterogeneous: being very dense around the median climate and
sparser at the extremes. This is illustrated by the histograms that represent
the marginal distributions. The anomalies are smaller for the
best-represented climate values and increase with distance from the median
climate. The blue line represents the linear model fitted, with its
associated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.clim-past.net/10/2081/2014/cp-10-2081-2014-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p>Scatterplot representing a 2-D projection of the climatic space of
southern Africa for the two variables Tmean ann and prec ann. In green
and red are the modern positions of two fictious palaeoarchives. Those two
points represent two very different situations relative to the climatic
space: well-represented (green) vs. rare (red) climate. Reconstructing
climate changes for the green palaeoarchive should be more accurate because
it can “move” in several directions around its modern climate. However, the
only major direction in which the red sample can move is towards warmer and
drier conditions. Colder temperatures should be “reconstructible” but with
an amplitude that may not reflect actual variability.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.clim-past.net/10/2081/2014/cp-10-2081-2014-f11.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The only factor that explains a significant part of the dispersion is the
distance of the expected value from the most represented value of the
variable over the study area (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). We fitted linear models
to explain the anomalies as a function of the expected value
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>). All were significant (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>value</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
with positive slopes. A noticeable difference between temperature-like (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % on average) and moisture-like variables (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % on
average) is observed, indicating that values that lie far from the most
represented climate exhibit the highest anomalies (on the left and/or
right-hand side(s) on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>Our results indicate that the PDF-based method of CREST performs well
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>, Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> and
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>), even if some differences in terms of
reconstruction quality exist between variables. The variables that were best
reconstructed were those that have a direct impact on the physiology of
plants, and thus strongly constrain their distribution (e.g. Tmean wet Q,
Frost days, Prec dry Q or Prec wet Q) (referred to as <italic>direct gradients</italic> by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="altparen.68"/>). The impact of other
variables such as mean diurnal range or temp seasonality on the plant life
cycle is indirect. Thus, they are less likely to be accurately reconstructed
from pollen data. Variables that are surrogates for direct gradient may show
strong ability to describe modern data but poor predictive power to describe
past conditions (see, e.g., the palaeolimnological example of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="altparen.69"/>). Selection of variable(s) of interest should always
be conditioned to an appropriate analysis of the data. Statistics could help
in that process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.70"/>, but the final
decision about the variables to reconstruct should always derive from an
enlightened choice based on both statistical and ecological/environmental
considerations. In the semi-arid to arid environments of southern Africa,
precipitation and/or water availability strongly constrain plants
distributions, which probably explains why we get lower NRMSDs for
moisture-related variables in our case study.</p>
      <p>The method performed well regardless of vegetation type. We were not able to
show any differences in accuracy between the different biomes and/or
ecoregions, provided that the distribution of the biome and/or ecoregion was
sufficiently spatially extensive. Based on these results, we have found that
the method works best for vegetation types represented by at least <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
to 50 quarter-degree grid cells (<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>estimation<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> based on
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>) in order to adequately determine the plant–climate
relationship.</p>
      <p>While our expectation was that a high number of species would result in more
precise reconstructions, we were not able to observe any relationship between
anomalies and the number of species. Anomalies do decrease when the number of
species begins to increase (from 1 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–30), but then the tendency
is reversed, and the large anomalies were observed in samples with the
largest number of species. This may be related to a saturation problem,
wherein more is not necessarily better. As we used a presence/absence
weighting strategy, species far from their climate optimum have the same
importance as those living in their optimal climate. The increase in the
number of species could increase these marginal elements, biasing the
reconstructions. The role of the number of taxa on the accuracy is not yet
fully understood and is the subject of ongoing studies.</p>
      <p>Other studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.71"/> have
shown that selecting a subset of the recorded taxa was sometimes more
appropriate when attempting to capture a given climate signal. In order to
improve the quality of the reconstructed variables, consideration should be
given to reconstructing each variable with a different subset of the total of
the available species list. Reducing this list to a shorter list of
responsive species reduces the noise and consequently leads to better
reconstructions. These choices, however, are not wholly objective. A first
approach consists in observing directly the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>pol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s since
flat and multimodal PDFs may indicate insensitivity to a given climate
variable. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.72"/> made choices based on considerations of the
ecology of the given species, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.73"/> opted for a more
statistical approach. To avoid using redundant information, only species that
were statistically different (based on the Mahalanobis distance between the
PDFs) were conserved. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.74"/> combined those two approaches
and based their choices both on niche-based modelling and ecological
considerations. The process of selection is thus not straightforward, and,
while it may improve reconstructions, care needs to be taken to avoid undue
bias in the results. The selection of the different sets of pollen types
probably lowers the impact of spatial autocorrelation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx43" id="paren.75"/>. However, it should be kept in
mind that the “supposed” reconstructed variable may in fact be a composite
of primary and secondary variables. Secondary variables have the power to
strongly bias reconstructions when spatially correlated with the variable of
<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>interest<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.76"/>, so that only part of the reconstructed
palaeovariability can be related directly to it. CREST (Appendix 1) provides
a range of outputs that indicate the sensitivity of different taxa to given
climatic parameters and allow the user to assess the data being considered
and make informed choices in the selection of such subsets.</p>
      <p>When plotted on a map (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> and
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>), the reconstruction anomalies appear to be
spatially clustered. Those patches of large anomalies can be explained by the
position of the local climate along the climate gradients
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>) and are a direct consequence of the hypotheses
underlying the model. The method is correlative, and consequently it is
biased towards the best-represented climate values. This uneven sampling of
the environmental gradients biases the estimation of plants' optima by
shifting the “real” optimum towards the portion of the gradient with the
most observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.77"/>. In most cases, lowest/highest
values along the studied climate gradient are rare, but there are exceptions.
For example, low rainfall amounts are common in southern Africa, and as a
result they are well represented and the signal is easily captured by the model.</p>
      <p>To offset the impact of the climate distribution's heterogeneity, we
upweighted rare climate values as proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.78"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.79"/>. This method shifts PDF optima towards the rarest
climate values. The climate abundance weighting did decrease the errors for
the extreme climates but also increased them for the most common ones (data not
shown). The overall impact is nevertheless positive since it decreased the
RMSDs for all the variables. It also reduced the clustering of errors.
Despite its advantages, the strategy has the drawback that artificial
geographical limits must be selected <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.80"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g. mountain ranges or country
borders;</named-content></xref> to compute the weights. A finite number of grid
cells must be selected and sorted into bins. Any change in the boundaries
would affect – potentially significantly – the weights, and thus the
reconstructions. It is also possible that the climate abundance weighting may
be the cause of the small but significant bias observed between temperature
and moisture variables, which are, respectively, under- and overestimated for
rare climates in the region.</p>
      <p>Even with the climate abundance weighting, it is apparent that reconstructing
the rarest climates is extremely complicated with models such as those
described here. This is why, for example, the Cape region is poorly
reconstructed for the precipitation-like variables but not for the
temperature-like variables. The temperature of the area is common in southern
Africa – so its signal is well captured – but it is an outlier in terms of
quantity and seasonality of rainfall. Other areas of notable climatic rarity
in southern Africa include (1) the eastern portion of the Great Escarpment
(high precipitation); (2) the high mountains of Lesotho, where temperatures
are very low and precipitation is high; (3) the thin coastal band along the
southern coast of South Africa, where moist forests can develop as a result of
significant aseasonal rainfall; and (4) along the Namibian coast (stable
temperature and extremely low precipitation). All these areas lie at an
extreme (relative to the study area) of one or several climatic gradients,
giving rise to clusters of high anomalies.</p>
      <p>In terms of reconstructing quantitatively long-term climate variations it
should be kept in mind that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined by the modern
climatic space. Climatic space varies over time, and certain elements of some
past climate regimes may be more or less abundant and/or more or less accessible
to some species than in the modern climatic space <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.81"/>.
Depending on the location of the site vis-à-vis the climatic space, the
potential to estimate the amplitude of climate change varies. As shown
schematically in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>, samples located in the mean climate
space have greater potential to “move” in several directions and with
greater amplitude than samples that are already at the margin of the climatic
space. In the latter case, the exact amplitude of change may be
underestimated, but the overall trends and direction of change may still be
accurate. It is expected that, even under a different climate, the relative
position of the different taxa along a climatic gradient would stay the same,
so that the replacement in the past of a taxon by another that currently
lives in colder environments will effectively indicate colder conditions with
– possibly large – uncertainties regarding the amplitude of change
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.82"/>.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>The PDF-based method we have presented in this paper provides robust
results across a range of climates and vegetation types. We have demonstrated
that the accuracy does not vary significantly as a function of vegetation
type or the number of species considered, and it is thus a useful tool for
reconstructing climates in many regions and biomes. The accuracy of the
reconstructions is, however, strongly impacted by the climate variable being
reconstructed (direct or indirect gradients) and primarily by the position of
the targeted climate on the climate gradient of the study area. To ensure a
robust reconstruction, one should
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p>select climate variables that directly impact the distribution of the species and, inversely, use only
species whose distributions are significantly defined by the climatic variable;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>where possible, work with samples collected in widespread vegetation types to fit the most reliable PDFs;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>define a climatically coherent study area to take advantage of the climate abundance weighting.</p></list-item></list>
The results presented in this paper highlight our current understanding of
the potential and limitations of the CREST method for reconstructing climates
from botanical data. Recent work has shown the potential of the models upon
which CREST has been based, particularly in regards to long-term climate
reconstructions (Chase et al., 2015; Truc et al., 2013). Our goal with CREST
is to make these techniques more accessible to the wider scientific
community, and it is our hope that this tool will be applied to study other
areas where long-term climate variations still need to be quantitatively
described.</p>
      <p>CREST is freely available from the authors as well as at
<uri>www.hyrax.univ-montp2.fr</uri>.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{CREST: Climate REconstruction\hack{\\} SofTware}?><title>CREST: Climate REconstruction<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> SofTware</title>
      <p>We have implemented our method into a software package entitled CREST
(Climate REconstruction SofTware). CREST is an integrated multiplatform
open-source program developed to facilitate climatic reconstructions. The
advantage of CREST is the opportunity to change easily a range of parameters
(e.g. the shape of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, how to use the pollen
percentages, using the climate abundance weighting, different set of
pollen types for each variable). CREST can also access different
types of databases: MySQL, SQLite3 and Microsoft Access databases. Any user
can then use his or her own climatic and botanical data to perform climate
reconstructions.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Since the optimal reconstruction of palaeoclimatic variables is an iterative
process (many runs are usually necessary to interpret the reconstructed
patterns), CREST can generate detailed outputs (both figures and text files)
that offer the possibility to have a detailed feedback on the reconstructed
values. We believe that understanding which pollen types are important and
why is of prime importance to ensure a reliable reconstruction. Many tools
have been implemented to avoid the common “statistical black box” criticism
and render the process accessible for the wider community.</p>
      <p>Finally, it should be stated that CREST has been written so that options can
easily be changed and/or added to the software with little knowledge of
Python coding (different shapes for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s can be added, the default
parameters of CREST can be changed, the outputs can be tuned, etc.).</p>
      <p>CREST is available for free from the authors as well as at
<uri>www.hyrax.univ-montp2.fr</uri>.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Funding was received from the European Research Council (ERC) under the
European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC Starting
Grant “HYRAX”, grant agreement no. 258657. M. Chevalier was partially
funded by the EU-funded FP6 ECOCHANGE (Challenges in assessing and
forecasting biodiversity and ecosystem changes in Europe, no. 066866 GOCE).
The South African National Biodiversity Institute is thanked for the use of
data supplied by SANBI from digitized collections. Two anonymous reviewers
are kindly thanked for their constructive comments. This is ISEM
contribution no. 2014-168. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: V. Rath</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Atkinson et al.(1987)</label><mixed-citation> Atkinson, T. C.,
Briffa, K. R., and Coope, G. R.: Seasonal temperatures in Britain
during the past 22 000 yr, reconstructed using beetle
remains, Nature, 325, 587–592, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Austin(1987)</label><mixed-citation> Austin, M. P.: Models for the
analysis of species' response to environmental gradients, Vegetatio,
69, 35–45, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Austin and Gaywood(1994)</label><mixed-citation> Austin, M. P.
and Gaywood, M. J.: Current problems of environmental gradients and
species response curves in relation to continuum
theory, J. Veg. Sci., 5, 473–482, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Birks and Seppä(2004)</label><mixed-citation> Birks, H. J. B.
and Seppä, H.: Pollen-based reconstructions of late-Quaternary
climate in europe – progress, problems, and pitfalls, Acta
Palaeobot., 44, 317–334, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Birks et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation> Birks, H. J. B., Line, L.,
Juggins, S., Stevenson, A. C., and ter Braak, K. J. F.: Diatoms and pH
reconstruction, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B., 327, 263–278, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Birks et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation> Birks, H. J. B., Heiri, O.,
Seppä, H., and Bjune, A. E.: Strengths and weaknesses of quantitative
climate reconstructions based on Late-Quaternary biological proxies,
Open Ecol. J., 3, 68–110, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Braconnot et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation> Braconnot, P.,
Harrison, S. P., Kageyama, M., Bartlein, P. J., Masson-Delmotte, V.,
Abe-Ouchi, B., and Zhao, Y.: Evaluation of climate models using
palaeoclimatic data, Nat. Clim. Change, 2, 417–424, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Chase and Meadows(2007)</label><mixed-citation> Chase, B. M.
and Meadows, M. E.: Late Quaternary dynamics of southern Africa's
winter rainfall zone, Earth-Sci. Rev., 84, 103–138, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Chase, B. M., Lim, S., Chevalier, M., Boom, A., Carr, A. S., Meadows, M. E.,
and Reimer, P. J.: Influence of tropical easterlies in the southwestern Cape
of Africa during the Holocene, Quat. Sci. Rev., 107, 138–148, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Deacon and Landcaster(1988)</label><mixed-citation> Deacon, J. and
Lancaster, N.: Late Quaternary palaeoenvironments of southern
Africa, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 225 pp., 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Dray and Dufour(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Dray, S. and Dufour, A. B.,  The ade4 package: implementing the
duality diagram for ecologists, J. Stat. Soft., 22, 4, 1–20, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Elias(1997)</label><mixed-citation> Elias, S.: The mutual climatic range method
of palaeoclimate reconstruction based on insect fossils: New applications
and interhemispheric comparisons, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 16, 1217–1225,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Gebhardt et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation> Gebhardt, C.,
Kühl, N., Hense, A., and Litt, T., Reconstruction of quaternary
temperature fields by dynamically consistent smoothing,
Clim. Dynam., 30, 421–437, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Goldblatt and Manning(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Goldblatt, P. and Manning, J. C.: Plant diversity of the Cape region
of southern Africa, 2002, Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard., 89, 281–302, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Guiot(1990)</label><mixed-citation> Guiot, J.: Methodology of the last
climatic cycle reconstruction in France from pollen data,
Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 80, 49–69, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Guiot and de Vernal(2011a)</label><mixed-citation> Guiot, J. and
de Vernal, A.: Is spatial autocorrelation introducing biases in the apparent
accuracy of paleoclimatic reconstructions?, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 30,
1965–1972, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Guiot and de Vernal(2011b)</label><mixed-citation> Guiot, J. and
de Vernal, A.: QSR Correspondence “Is spatial autocorrelation introducing
biases in the apparent accuracy of palaeoclimatic reconstructions?” Reply
to Telford and Birks, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 30, 3214–3216, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Guiot et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation> Guiot, J., de
Beaulieu, J. L., Cheddadi, R., David, F., Ponel, P., and Reille, M.:
The climate in Western Europe during the last GlacialInterglacial
cycle derived from pollen and insect remains,
Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 103, 73–93, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Guisan and Zimmermann(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Guisan, A. and Zimmermann, N. E.: Predictive habitat distribution
models in ecology, Ecol. Model., 135, 147–186, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Hijmans et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation> Hijmans, R. J.,
Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G., and Jarvis, A.: Very
high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas,
Int. J. Climatol., 25, 1965–1978, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Hirzel and Le Lay(2008)</label><mixed-citation> Hirzel, A. H. and
Le Lay, G.: Habitat suitability modelling and niche
theory, J. Appl. Ecol., 45, 1372–1381, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Huntley et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation> Huntley, B.,
Berry, P. M., Cramer, W., and McDonald, A. P.: Modelling present and
potential future ranges of some European higher plants using climate
response surfaces, J. Biogeogr., 22, 967–1001, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Jackson and Williams(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, S. T. and Williams, J. W.: Modern analogs in Quaternary
Paleoecology: Here today, gone yesterday, gone tomorrow,
Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 32, 495–537, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Juggins(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Juggins, S.: Quantitative reconstructions in palaeolimnology: new paradigm or sick science?,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 64, 20–32, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Kearney(2006)</label><mixed-citation> Kearney, M.: Habitat,
environment and niche what are we modelling, OIKOS, 115, 186–191, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Kühl et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation> Kühl, N.,
Gebhardt, C., Litt, T., and Hense, A.: Probability density functions
as botanical-climatological transfer functions for climate
reconstruction, Quaternary Res., 58, 381–392, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Mac Nally(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Mac Nally, R.: Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology:
The distinction between – and reconciliation of –“predictive” and “explanatory” models,
Biodivers. Conserv., 9, 655–671, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Malmgren et al(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Malmgren, B. A., Kucera, M.,
Nyberg, J., and Waelbroeck, C.: Comparison of statistical and artificial neural
networks techniques for estimating past sea surface temperatures from planktonic
foraminifer census data, Paleoceanography, 16, 520–530, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Mitchell and Jones(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Mitchell, T. D. and Jones, P. D.: An improved method of constructing
a database of monthly climate observations and associated
high-resolution grids, Int. J. Climatol., 25, 693–712, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Moran(1950)</label><mixed-citation> Moran, P. A. P.: Notes on continuous
stochastic phenomena, Biometrika, 37, 17–23, 1950.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Mosbrugger and Utescher(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Mosbrugger, V. and Utescher,T.: The coexistence approach - a method
for quantitative reconstructions of Tertiary terrestrial palaeoclimate data
using plant fossils, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 134, 61–86, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Myers et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation> Myers, N.,
Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A., and
Kent, J.: Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities, Nature,
403, 853–858, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Olson et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation> Olson, D. M.,
Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D.,
Powell, G. V. N., Underwood, E. C., D'amico, J. A., Itoua, I.,
Strand, H. E., Morrison, J. C., Loucks, C. J., Allnutt, T. F.,
Ricketts, T. H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J. F., Wettengel, W. W.,
Hedao, P., and Kassem, K. R.: Terrestrial ecoregions of the world
a new map of life on Earth, BioScience, 51, 933–938, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Overpeck(1985)</label><mixed-citation> Overpeck, J. T.: A pollen
study of a late Quaternary peat bog, south-central Adirondack
Mountains, New York, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 96, 145–154, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Partridge and Maud(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Partridge, T. C. and Maud, R. R.: The Cenozoic of Southern Africa,
Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>SANBI(2003)</label><mixed-citation>PRECIS (National Herbarium Pretoria
(PRE) Computerized Information System): database, available at:
<uri>http://sibis.sanbi.org/faces/DataSources.jsp</uri> (last access: 28 December 2011),
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>R core team(2014)</label><mixed-citation>R Core Team:
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing,
<uri>http://www.R-project.org/</uri>,  2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Rutherford et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Rutherford, M. C., Powrie, L. W., and Midgley, G. F.: ACKDAT
a digital spatial database of distributions of South African plant
species and species assemblages, S. Afr. J. Bot., 69, 1–6, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Rutherford et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Rutherford, M. C., Mucina, L., and Powrie, L. W.: The South African
National Vegetation Database History, development, applications,
problems and future, S. Afr. J. Sci., 108, 1–8, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Salonen et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation> Salonen, J. S.,
Seppä, H., Luoto, M., Bjune, A. E., and Birks, H. J. B.: A North
European pollen–climate calibration set: analysing the climatic
responses of a biological proxy using novel regression tree methods,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 45, 95–110, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Scott et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Scott, L., Holmgren, K., and Talma, A.:
Age interpretation of the Wonderkrater spring sediments and vegetation change
in the Savanna Biome, Limpopo province, South Africa, S. Afr. J. Sci., 99, 484–488, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Sinka and Atkinson(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Sinka, K. J. and Atkinson, T. C.: A mutual climatic range method for
reconstructing palaeoclimate from plant
remains, J. Geol. Soc. Lond., 156, 381–396, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Telford and Birks(2005)</label><mixed-citation> Telford, R. and Birks, H. J. B.:
The secret assumption of transfer functions: problems with spatial
autocorrelation in evaluating model performance, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 24,
2173–2179, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Telford and Birks(2009)</label><mixed-citation> Telford, R. and Birks, H. J. B.:
Evaluation of transfer functions in spatially structured environments, Quaternary Sci. Rev.,
28, 1309–1316, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Telford and Birks(2011a)</label><mixed-citation>Telford, R. and Birks, H. J. B.:
Effect of uneven sampling along an environmental gradient on
transfer-function performance, J. Paleolimnol., 46, 99–106, 2011a.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Telford and Birks(2011b)</label><mixed-citation> Telford, R. and Birks, H. J. B.:
QSR Correspondence “Is spatial autocorrelation introducing biases in the
apparent accuracy of palaeoclimatic reconstructions?”, Quaternary Sci. Rev.,
30, 3210–3213, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Telford and Birks(2011c)</label><mixed-citation> Telford, R. and Birks, H. J. B.:
A novel method for assessing the statistical significance of quantitative
reconstructions inferred from biotic assemblages, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 30,
1272–1278, 2011c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>ter Braak and Looman(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
ter Braak, C. J. F. and Looman, C. W. N.:  Weighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response
model, Vegetatio, 65, 3–11, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>ter Braak and Juggins(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
ter
Braak, C. J. F. and Juggins, S.: Weighted averaging partial least
squares regression (WA-PLS) an improved method for reconstructing
environmental variables from species assemblages, Hydrobiologia,
269–270, 485–502, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>ter Braak and van Dame(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
ter Braak, C. J. F. and van Dame, H.: Inferring pH from diatoms: a comparison
of old and new calibration methods, Hydrobiologia, 178, 209–223, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Thioulouse et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation> Thioulouse, J., Chessel, D.,
Doledec, S., and Olivier, J. M.: ADE-4 a multivariate analysis and
graphical display software, Stat. Comput., 7, 75–83, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Trabucco and Zomer(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Trabucco, A.
and Zomer, R. J.: Global Aridity Index (Global-Aridity) and Global
Potential Evapo-Transpiration (Global-PET) Geospatial Database,
CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information, Published online,
available from the CGIAR-CSI GeoPortal at:
<uri>http://www.csi.cgiar.org</uri> (last access: January 2013), 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Trabucco and Zomer(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Trabucco, A.
and Zomer, R. J.: Global Soil Water Balance Geospatial
Database, CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information, Published
online, available from the CGIAR-CSI GeoPortal at:
<uri>http://www.cgiar-csi.org</uri> (last access: January 2013), 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Truc et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation> Truc, L., Chevalier, M.,
Favier, C., Cheddadi, R., Meadows, M. E., Scott, L., Carr, A. S.,
Smith, G. F., and Chase, B. M.: Quantification of climate change for
the last 20 000 yr from Wonderkrater, South Africa:
implications for the long-term dynamics of the Intertropical
Convergence Zone, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 286, 575–587, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Tyson(1986)</label><mixed-citation> Tyson, P. D.: Climatic Change and
Variability in Southern Africa, Oxford University Press, Cape Town, 208 pp., 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Utescher et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation> Utescher, T., Bruch, A. A.,
Erdei, B, François, L., Ivanov, D., Jacques, F. M. B., Kern, A. K., Liu, Y. S. (C.),
Mosbrugger, V., and Spicer, R. A.: The Coexistence Approach–Theoretical
background and practical considerations of using plant fossils for climate quantification,
Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 410, 58–73, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Veloz et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation> Veloz, S. D.,
Williams, J. W., Blois, J. L., He, F., Otto-Bliesner, B., and
Liu, Z.: No-analog climates and shifting realized niches during the
late quaternary: implications for 21st-century predictions by
species distribution models, Global Change Biol., 18, 1698–1713, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
